The video segment below is unlikely to remain visible because it is against the interests of Fox News. However, in the interim Fox News Host Tucker Carlson tonight decided to target President Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell.
Tucker chastised Powell for not providing evidence to him for her claim that votes and machines were modified to reduce Donald Trump and inflate Joe Biden. Carlson was is upset at Powell, saying:
…”she never sent us any evidence despite a lot of requests, polite requests, not a page. When we kept pressing she got angry and told us to stop contacting her. When we checked with others around the Trump campaign, people with positions of authority, they told us Powell has never given them any evidence of either, nor has she provided any today at the press conference.”
I’m not exactly sure why Carlson demands Sidney Powell give her evidence to him or face his criticism; but that’s the position of the Fox News host. He has done this before.
Tucker has always been the young, ignorant, questioning authority type. It’s why, during this time, he is the most popular show on cable. It is, after all, a time when many in media are not asking questions.
Tucker is impulsive though. When Sydney offers information regarding the origins of alleged foreign ballot machines and its software, the unknown investors, the countries historically effected, the lobbyists and political figures enriched, the foreign locations of servers used and the affidavits of employees acknowledging voter manipulation and that this info needs to be presented to Courts before going public, patience is needed.
Yesterday’s presser with Trump Legal Team was an “opening statement”, and showing US citizens that if there is widespread fraud in our elections, the Constitution has provided us with a remedy.
Trump team has outlined the extent of the voter fraud and electronic engineering which allegedly took place.
Tucker should note Dominion has not filed a Defamation suit, a clear tell.
I think it is a fair question to ask for proof. As the Great Hoax showed us, rumor and innuendo can carry a story, but evidence is required to demonstrate the truth of the accusation. I am waiting for The Kraken to be released and have had enough ‘Tic Toc’ from The Hoax investigation that has delivered no results. I am looking for more than statistical analysis that shows what happened is impossible. Prove it to us! I am on board, but we need more than accusations.
@needgar
1. the Statistical tools clearly show numbers to Biden that are not possible without human interference.
2. Why should Sidney Powell give Tucker evidence that needs to presented to a court?
3. Who has the German/Dominion/Smartmatic/CIA server that stole the election?
An American Election has (potentially) been stolen and there are many, many dirty fingers in the pot.
It is not to you that Trump’s defense team must provide proof, but the court’s.
I can appreciate your fatigue with the “tictoc” but Sidney is not one of those. WE are the ones putting a time frame on this particular situation and making ourselves anxious; that will not get the justice we are looking for. At minimum, it took four years for the enemies of the people to concoct this. You are asking her to unravel it all and declare victory in 3 weeks.
Apparently, you don’t consider affidavits from math and stat experts to be evidence.
needgar…guess I haven’t realized that Tucker is a sitting judge and jury in a courtroom!! Lawyers never give out the evidence prior to the trial. Accusations are all that is needed right now especially when the cream of the crop attorneys are holding the ace in the hole.
Yep. Back during the Trayvon Martin case, thanks to Sundance’s research and him leading his crowd-sourcing army, we here in the Treehouse knew more about the facts than 99.9% of the media and the public. We even knew about obscure details that seemed almost like conspiracy theories, but turned out in the end to be true. But even so, even with our vast knowledge of nearly every aspect of that case, there were still a few things that caught us by surprise when finally disclosed, that George’s lawyers had kept HIDDEN until the last minute.
My point being that yeah… it makes perfect sense for Trump’s team members to keep a lot of stuff under wraps for the time being, and I’m not surprised.
Yes, interesting point on the “tell.” It seems as if everyone is just keeping their heads down hoping it will go away (on both sides no less).
I literally stopped watching Fox as a news outlet in October 2001.
They were selling hysteria over the Anthrax incident, instructing people to buy window sealant and duct tape for their doors… just like washing your vegetables for COVID! Fear sells!
But what really turned me off was the aftermath of an episode of O’Reilly in which he was seeking an explanation about the reports of Pakistani helicopters taking Al Qaeda personnel out of Afghanistan across the border. O’Reilly was his usual boisterous self and it seemed like valid journalism. About the same time other outlets were questioning the flight of the Bin Laden family out of the U.S. But it was never touched on again.., it was nothing but pro-Bush propaganda after that episode. It’s like O’Reilly had never brought it up.
AFTER 9-11-2001…Haven’t watched it since…
Fear industry. Not worth my time.
I should have stopped watching after their Hurricane Katrina coverage. Shep Smith was so over the top. BUT, I didn’t seek out alternatives; I thought it was just him.
Carlson is correct that Powell will have to produce evidence to prove her charges. However, she needs to do that in a court of law, not on his show.
“But what about the court of public opinion I preside over”….T. Carlson
Is anything stopping Tucker from being a real journalist and investigating Dominion himself?
We should be hearing Tucker’s reports that Sidney could be using to strengthen her case like the FBI used the media reports when building their case against PT.
Entirely Correct.
The Problem I hear is the evidence is on a thumb drive ;).
Also Tucker swore to his masters he would never touch a thumb drive with evidence again. He is obviously under penalty of losing his “Status” and will be returned to the Jr Gman club as a jr level reporter in Pennsylvania with his own special decoder ring.
He was friends with Hunter and his wife. Might be some skeletons there… right Turncoat Tucker?
I know of much Sidney has spoken. It is out there. It is available thru just plain basic research on this and ability to do your own work. TUCKER has never been an investigator reporter. He just uses other peoples work as his own. ALWAYS.
Problem is Tucker can’t do basic arithmetic. Nothing fancy, except when hunting down algorithmic equations inside the software.
Oh Tucker also has an issue with his paycheck. He loves it more than his country.
Why, because his masters he relishes to lick their boots of, they want the evidence, so they can prepare their cases. EO is a catchall even down to Tucker if found. Tucker has cast his last di with me. He will live in infamy everafter.
Tucker has done this before. He talks a good game, but when the starting flag drops he folds like a baby’s diaper, which he wears also. Oh yes Tucker has a long history of being boot licking slave.
TUCKER FOR PRISON.
His interjection into the NYPost/Hunter Biden story REALLY made a difference??/sarc
Like magic the story disappeared.
Only yesterday I expressed a viewpoint similar to Tucker’s: “Produce your whistleblowers when you speak!”
Later, though, I watched Rudy’s presser with Sidney and Joe. One RUDE “reporter” used Acosta-tactics to hijack the Q+A session to SELL a message that would be heard on every network. She made it sound like the Campaign was dropping (or losing) its lawsuits (they aren’t) and that attorneys are quitting left and right-or hard to find- out of disbelief of the merits of the lawsuits.
Rudy said, YES, a few HAVE left, but only because of threats from the Rabid Left that are largely fueled by the antagonistic manner with which they (the press) are reporting on the Election Fraud crisis.
Rudy ALSO said that he CAN’T go public with his whistleblowers because THEY have been targeted with all sorts of threat s.
It appears that his Lordship Carlson may be shy some of his court watchers henceforth.
Or she knows that Trump’s base is sprinting from Fox to OAN and Newsmax.
Agreed. There could be any number of leads they are currently chasing down that could be squelched if Team Trump revealed what they know now. Investigations are kept secret for a reason. Litigation teams always limit their public statements during the process.
Yes! Not a court of “flaw”.
Ya think? Maybe someone should give Tucker a clue.
Tucknrun will sing a different tune ( “See, I knew there was evidence of fraud and did my best to get it out there”) when this all reaches the crescendo.
I’d like to know where those documents are that Tucker claimed would sink Biden. Remember the ones shipped from New York to LA.. the ones that disappeared for 36 hours then amazingly reappeared?
That’s exactly right.
The time is rapidly approaching where President Trump’s attorney WILL have to put forward their evidence and THEN we’ll all know exactly what it is. The proper venue for the production of evidence is in a court filing/court of law.
And for the record, there is LEGAL PRECEDENCE for sworn testimony being used as EVIDENCE in cases of voter fraud. Because of the nature of the fraud, the difficulty in weeding it out (mixing in illegal ballots with legal ballots, etc.), hard evidence is not easily gotten early on if ever.
Because of the time constraints to certify elections, those challenging the outcomes are under the gun, so to speak, to present their evidence.
Lin Wood did the right thing in requesting a Preliminary Injunction against certifying the election in Georgia. There is no way an honest court won’t grant it given the allegations and testimentary evidence of fraud he has gathered. The court has to grant it. If it doesn’t, the court is saying I don’t believe any of your witnesses or this type of fraud is okay.
BUT, a Preliminary Injunction has a very limited lifespan and is granted ONLY to allow the side requesting it time to gather evidence. The clock will be ticking and, if that evidence isn’t there at the next hearing, the injunction will expire.
Sadly It appears we don’t have honest courts.
Sadly, I agree with you. Witness testimony, including via Affidavit, is supposed to be looked on by the court as true. Therefore, if the court denies the preliminary injunction the judge is basically saying, “I hear what you’re saying and I believe it to be true, but tough…”
I’ve seen MANY
??????
A preliminary injunction requires a likelihood of prevailing at trial. You cannot simply show up with a list of allegations, you have to show that you stand a good chance of proving them. You also have to show irreparable harm from not having the injunction granted, but that seems like a given here.
It’s evidence time.
A preliminary injunction requires a likelihood of prevailing at trial. You cannot simply show up with a list of allegations, you have to show that you stand a good chance of proving them. You also have to show irreparable harm from not having the injunction granted, but that seems like a given here.
It’s evidence time.
I believe the injunction was denied yesterday by the Judge. Let me find the link.
https://tennesseestar.com/2020/11/20/district-judge-denies-motion-to-delay-certification-of-votes-in-lin-wood-case-against-georgia-secretary-of-state/
He lacked “standing”. How in the hell does a GA voter not have standing?
Thought the same thing. Doesn’t appear that the judge gave it much thought either.
Tucker is being loyal to the one (Fox) he brought to the dance.
What many here are saying, is his date has been seen out back with a few other boys, and not just talking either. With many witnesses, he now, in apparent frustration, is taking the position of defending his date and ignoring the truth (sworn affidavits).
More here but need to recognize Tuckers curiosity and impulsive nature is what has made his show so popular at a time where many are not seeking truth.
When the Trump Legal team does finally show their hand in Court, Tucker will be furthering their concerns about election engineering by foreign firms and concerns.
Having followed the affable Carlson for over twenty years now (his bow tie years), I am not surprised. The only thing which suprises me, is how many here ARE surprised.
If you want to understand his roots (and his wealthy upbringing), his Wikipukia page is a good, simple start. It should explain a lot for those who had misconceptions about his background.
According to anonymous sources, The Murdochs refer to Tucker as the affordable Carlson.
At this news conference, all news media were challenged to go do their job and search out the evidence. The Trump team has already done the news media’s job. Why should they now give information to a lazy and biased group? As a Trump supporter I am willing to wait a couple of weeks for the information to come out in trial. That will expose the media even more than if they were spoon fed now by the Trump team.
Fox news is now exposed for what they always have been, opportunistic liars. If Sydney Powell were to give any evidence to the press prior to trial they would do nothing but undermine and pic it apart. Apparently Tucker missed the part during the press conference where they stated “this is like an opening statement in a case. You don’t present your evidence then, you tell people what evidence your going to present”.
Just a snake shedding his skin on demand.
The death spiral of Fox News continues. The kids are destroying dad’s empire.
“Children today are impossible. They gobble their food, contradict their teachers, and disrespect their elders.”
– Socrates
The more things change the more they stay the same. Human character is fluid yet immutable. It’s been observed that the third generation of wealth is often the one who brings it down. The first generation, those who created the wealth, are of course going to tend it carefully. The second generation, being that close to the source, will also maintain it. But the third generation, who was born and raised in wealth and knows no other lifestyle, has no connection with its source or creation, and is often the one who irresponsibly squanders it.
On the evening of 11/18 I set my DVR to stop recording Tucker. I’ve been watching carefully to see if he bent to the corporate position, and he has (IMHO). He’s done some pro forma discussion of voter fraud — limited to discussing dead people voting while ignoring the massive fraud in Detroit (etc.), and Dominion software.
On the night of 11/18 ZERO mention of any of this.
I saw reference to this Sidney Powell attack piece (11/19) and so watched the video. Tucker knows full well that NO competent attorney is going to release their evidence to any news outlet before presenting it in court (much less a hostile news outlet). So he goes on air and pretends otherwise, and then pretends that this implies that the Trump team is blowing smoke, and so implicitly promoting the Fox corporate message that “Biden actually won.” All while he tries to present himself open to following the facts — he’s towing the corporate line but trying to present in a way that he / they hope his audience doesn’t notice.
I stopped watching the Fox News side after it deliberately helped the Dems in the 2018 midterms (by calling the House for them even while voting was underway out west). I did still watch Lou Dobbs and Tucker. Dobbs so far is bucking the corporate line; Maria Bartiromo’s Sunday Futures is also remaining worthwhile … so far.
What occurred on 11/19 with Tucker attacking Sidney Powell merely reinforces for me that my decision to write him off was the correct one.
Sydney is a true patriot. Tucker has chosen to be a Faux loudmouth that needs bigger britches. I’ll stand with the patriot and forget all about the loudmouth. I haven’t watched Faux since the 2016 debates. I’ll catch Dobbs and Maria interviews when they are posted within an article.
Thomas, I 100% agree – also the ‘format’ of the show, with rushed 60 second appearances of random people is like a sugar high. There is never much of a ‘there’ there!
FOX News Sucks
I watched that segment, I was furious.. Tucker never said the word Dominion, I listened carefully.
Nope,, he did not… Sanctimonious, and arrogant,, and things I cannot say. Yesterday I still held out some hope. Not any more.
Maybe Sidney should send her evidence via UPS.
yeah. funny how cucker carlson dropped that story very quickly
How many msm reporters were ‘given’ actual evidence against Weinstein, Epstein or Madoff before the case was heard in court? In any other litigation actual evidence is presented in court. Once the case is presented, the journalists have their opportunity to examine the evidence – not before.
I stopped watching Tucker when he screamed that President Trump had started World War 3 by authorizing the takeout of that terrorist Soleimani. Apparently the President didn’t share his intel with Tucker then either.
Fox News is dead to me. It makes my stomach turn.
So very, very thankful for this site and Sundance. Between what Sundance posts and the comments, I feel like I get a good grip on what is going on without having to head over to the fake news we have been getting from Fox. Thank you all!
I hate to admit that I was nodding in agreement with many of Tuckers points – I am also waiting for the ironclad evidence. HOWEVER, I’ll remain hopeful (it’s really our only option) that there is something so damming that it is only going to be argued in court so the other side cannot be alerted to (1) mount a defense and (2) hide incriminating evidence. We are running out of time.
I, too, would like to see the evidence, but I’ll wait for the trials before proclaiming it doesn’t exist because they didn’t present it to me.
Whenever you can’t make sense of it……………………..it’s CIA
https://meaninginhistory.blogspot.com/2020/11/larry-johnson-on-scytl-raid.html
Sidney……………………it’s the bad guys
Are you sure its the bad guys?
Cucker Carlson
I saw that and noted that it was tricky. Sidney does not owe Tucker jack…up to her as to how she wants to prosecute this case.
Lead Attorney is Rudy not Sidney. So Tucker is way off base calling out Sidney. Just political theatre Kuck head Tucker sold out the country to do. Don’t forget to remind his Civilians can be tried in Military court. Ask Sidney to come on and talk about that
TUCKER.
“Where’s the evidence” is the new false song of the left. It assumes there is no evidence when in fact there is, but the proper place for it is in a court of law.
We cut the cable cord and now we are no longer watching faux.
Tucker lost us the minute he went after Sidney. He is supposedly an intelligent guy yet he thinks he should be given evidence that hasn’t been presented in court. That’s like giving every prospective jurists all the evidence and facts to the case they MIGHT be a jurist on. Blows the validity of the evidence and taints the whole case.
I don’t claim to be the sharpest tool in the shed but even I understand you don’t broadcast your evidence to the world before you get your day in court in front of a judge.
Tucker has gone after the wrong person and will feel the wrath of the people. May his ratings plummet faster than faux overall ratings have these past 2 weeks.
Tucker is the ultimate chameleon…when it suits him, and all for ratings, ratings, ratings. Was he EVER on the patriot/conservative side? I think not. Controlled opposition for the network, that’s all. And it worked. Now who will be putting all their money into propping up faux news? And will anyone bail? They have all shown their true colors right now.
Controlled opposition is what I was thinking as well.
We gave up FoxNews after the way that they and FoxBusiness (Neil Cavuto) handled this election night. I really hated giving up Tucker, but now, he and all of FoxNews is DEAD to me. And they genuinely seem to be quite baffled why their ratings have tanked. I would find it surprising if they managed to salvage their network after their decision to take a hard left turn. The left never watched them and likely still won’t.
Ah 4cats, remember following Lou Dobbs and Neil Cavuto on the wondernight of election 2016? How Lou stole the leadership of the show from Cavuto? How Lou set Cavuto in the second chair, and kept him there? Woohoo!
That night Lou Dobbs had inner knowledge that Donald Trump’s leads would hold up in every state. He was stuffing states in the win column quicker than anyone else, with glee and joy. “Looks like Donald Trump has this election in the bag.”
Every time Cavuto tried to anchor/ report/ editorialize. Lou would grin bigger and out-confidence Neil, and swipe his hand through the air as if a skeeter tried to speak.
Heh heh heh. That wuz coool !
Me and Hubby had already turned off Fox news. We occasionally watched Tucker on Youtube the next day but that ended last night. He is a goofy talking head from CA; no one cares about him. Sydney Powell is, well, . . . Sydney Powell! There is no comparison.
Duh, Please replace “jurists” with jurors and juror. Sorry about the confusion. Spell check is my friend, not. ?
Desperately need an edit option. ?
Well, it’s a valid question and one to which we all want to know the answer, given the magnitude of the allegation. Nor does the question now preclude the subsequent presentation of evidence. And all know that the timeframe of the investigation is compressed and the information as yet incomplete, changing by the hour. Some of the evidence may be sufficient to make credibly the allegation, but it may not be all of the obtainable evidence. And no doubt that is where Powell is right now. Beyond a reasonable doubt is a high standard is a high standard, and she wants it buttoned up. That takes time.
The first rule in conducting investigations is to not talk about investigations until you have the goods. Tipping your hand can compromise your case and put the gathering of critical information at risk. If they know where you’re looking, it makes it easier to destroy or tamper with evidence. Carlson knows this, and so do Powell, Guilani, et al.
The mere raising of that questions does, however, raises the visibility of the central issue and legitimizes it. ‘Yeah, where is the evidence?’. Seems to me we’re all a lot better off if the entire country starts asking that question, demanding, the answer to it. That’s not a bad scenario.
One can only hope that the goods are competent evidence produced and delivered in court for full effect. After that Powell can take up Carlson’s offer for a full week of explication of the data and evidence. Given the complexity of the case and the mau-mau that will ensue, that would be a good way to air it out.
Not criticizing Powell here. And not particularly Carlson either. He could / should have given better situational context to the question, but I don’t mind the increased visibility of the issue at all. And I don’t think Powell does either.
Regrets for a few typos.
In civil cases the reasonable doubt threshold is much lower – 51%. If 51% of people would have a reasonable doubt, you’ve “proven” your case. Big difference from reasonable doubt and “preponderance of the evidence” which is what I think, ultimately, Sidney Powell is going to have!
After last night, I wouldn’t blame Sidney if she never went on Tucker again.
Disagree. Tucker was floating the CNN schtick of “where’s the evidence.” Sidney and team just finished outlining tons of evidence and facts.
Tucker should have been stating how shocked he was to learn that our votes may have been counted overseas. Further, he should have announced his team was going to do a full story on this to get to the bottom of it.
SP provided exculpatory information and proof of fraudulent evidence in the Flynn case and Judge Sullivan pretended like it wasn’t there. What evidence?
This is the problem with the voting situation, there is significance evidence of fraud, but judges will ignore or dismiss it. If statistical impossibility, affidavits, testimony are not sufficient, I really do not know what it’ll take to ‘prove’ fraud.
I honestly Believe he likes president Trump. I think he wants to help him. Tucker at the moment has the audience to do so. Because Time is running out…no? The ball needs to start rolling no? I think Tucker would love to sink the Biden Ship.
I just took it as the need for people to have more information. What happens if she never makes it to court?
Tucker himself has said repeatedly he doesn’t like Donald Trump. Tucker is repulsed by the president because he’s from Queens and acts and sounds that way. Tucker is from a higher social class and is only comfortable with people like himself or those that ape his class.
Tucker thinks he is one of our “betters”; he can take a long walk off of a short pier.
Ok Show me once where he says he dent like Trump and Ill go away
Trump owned Rupert Murdoch royally yesterday for interferring with the election on election night plain and simple. Likely he used Sidney Powell to set up the Press Conference & she didn’t disclose the thrust of the spectacularly masterful surprise nuke attack Trump launched on the Deep State yesterday, especially the CIA story-boarded MSM, using Murdoch’s empire as his high platform and bully pulpit. Don’t forget Murdoch’s eldest son’s wife is an open Hillary worshipper and Trump hater. Imagine their shock watching that Press Conference! It was absolutely masterful and an act of war worthy of Sun Tzu. Sidney Powell has no obligation whatsoever morally ethically or particularly legally to give Carlson a heads up on Trump’s tactics or evidence. Trump is her client and he is in control. Trump is suing various entities that interfered in his election as a private citizen, not in his capacity as President of the United States. Imagine Carlson demanding any other plaintiff to show his legal cards to the media, acquiescence to which would be capitulation to trial by the media, not in the courts which have jurisdiction! The fact that would never happen turns Carlson’s righteous indignation on its head! Carlson was likely reamed out by Murdoch personally on the red carpet immediately after that press conference for this astounding jujitsu display by Trump, and the only reason he was not fired is his ratings, ironically, bouyed up by Trump! Tucker Carlson, to be fair, did publicly apologize for being one of the biggest supporters & cheerleaders of the US endless shock & awww war on an adverb post 911, albeit the only one wearing a bowtie. His continual self-righteous tone and tie made him stand out even amongst hawkish commentators crawling all over the airwaves during those years. It’s high time the arrogant pup got his come-uppance, and I for one relished Trump’s brilliant moment of revenge. It’s war now. Karma is a bitch. No doubt about it. Time people checked out their watches & internal moral compasses and made course corrections while there’s still time.
Why would she have to give him her evidence? She is taking that to the court not the media, we have learned we really can’t trust you……I don’ t watch Fox but it seems they are loosing a lot of viewers, they might want to be careful you might find yourself in the same condition at CNN…..
It seems t me she stated she had a sworn affidavit from the person who 1) wrote the original software, 2) was with Chavitz when it was first used, and 3) was with the ??? (Powell – “alphabet agency”) when it was deployed in Argentina.
Also explained was that the witnesses and people who are standing in the way have had their families threatened, harm threatened directly, and otherwise dragged through the mud as ‘idiots’ when the media finds out who they are.
There may have been evidence of the mentioned ??? agency on that server in Germany and the operation and location of it may have been provided by the mystery software person who was so important that, if standing in the presence of Chavez, may have indeed been a part of that ??? agency as well!
Yea, I am not sure that sort of ‘evidence’, or the evidence of Soros buying the exact machines used by Chavez for use in the USA, or the Clinton Foundation paying for the software used on those machines and in other machines as well, needs to be made public just yet…too many would be victims of ‘Arkanside’ if that happened.
It’s the judiciary, folks. PDT told us in 2015-16 before the election. It still is. Turtle’s legacy will contribute strongly to saving the nation as PDT takes down the leftists. The purging of the military globalists and industrial war machine will also be one of the biggest legacies of PDT and the patriots.
Do some of you still believe the men/women who plotted this strategy for this major correction of America years ago did not have the judicial strategy analyzed and executed properly? C’mon now.
Bad move, Tucker, to go after Sidney Powell like that. She owes you nothing, and harassing her is a great way to make sure you never get anything from her. Nobody likes to be harassed!
We never thought Tucker would ever kowtow to the Leftist Murdochs the way he’s suddenly doing. What a disappointment. Good thing that NewsMax is an alternative we can turn to.
I am losing faith in Tucker… He must be under pressure from the upper-levels at Fox?
Tucker is swamp. His father was involved in politics/government. He grew up in Georgetown and San Francisco when he wasn’t at his affluent boarding school.
He spent his adult life living in an exclusive DC neighborhood with the politically connected – 99% of who are progressives and was happy there.
He’s worked for CNN, MSNBC and FOX along with the Weekly Standard – he’s the definition of swamp.
I stopped watching Fox in 2011, so I’ve never seen an actual broadcast of TC, although I’ve watched clips posted here and elsewhere, if I was interested in the subject matter. I was ambivalent about him, take it or leave it ya know, but I figured he was on our side so I let him roll, unremarked. In fact, it made me squirm a little bit when Rush would refer to him as “Chatsworth Osborne Jr.” It seemed gratuitous and unnecessary.
Shoulda listened to ol’ MahaRushie….
“I never said I was the smartest man in the room. You just assumed it.”
Sidney Powell has been very accessible to many TV anchors that want to put questions to her – Maria B, Lou Dobbs, talk radio, and even over at NewsMax with Gregg Kelly.
For some reason she didn’t bow before TC and his nose is out of joint. Sidney must know something about TC that we don’t. She doesn’t trust TC?
There is only one person left with any integrity on Foxnews, Lou Dobbs. I don’t relate to anyone else on it. The rest seem disingenuous to me.
I agree.
There is only one person left with any integrity on Foxnews, Lou Dobbs. I don’t relate to anyone else on it. The rest seem disingenuous to me.
Yep, completely agree.
I like Maria B. as well. She’s following the STORY (without emotion) and not the characters.
These news anchors all start out young and fearless, on the street or in the war zone. Then they get older, richer, and get addicted to the hero worship. They sit in their big chair while people run to them and fix their makeup, write their scripts, and hand them BREAKING news on a silver platter. Tucker is no different. He’s too spoiled and lazy to go out and dig up his own story or even verify news. He’s a crying baby demanding to be spoon fed. Clean out your own diaper Tucker!
The goal of every journalist is to “scoop” the story. So? This is what is upending the mainstream media and is the hubris responsible for our mistrust of all news outlets.
Talk show actors are of little value to critical thinkers. Stasi Fox has an agenda and I think their owners are focused on the Global Reset they promote. I avoid these tv clowns. God bless Sidney Powell Rudy Giuliani and the brave souls that work with them for Us.
Here’s a crazy thought…why don’t you lazy folks in the media go look for the evidence yourself instead of sitting back and demanding it from Team Trump?
That seemed to be the jist of what Mayor Rudy was trying to convey at the presser. Hey media, why don’t you “Do Your Job”? In fighting the media’s willful blindness, Team Trump is presenting a mountain of information and actual evidence and is shaming the media. “Hey media, look at all this evidence. Aren’t you the least bit curious about all this? How can you possibly pretend to not know about all of this information we just presented to you?”
By the way, I like Tucker and am wondering if he is teeing something up here as a one two punch. In his “show us the receipts” discussion, he did say if this is true, it’s the biggest scandal in history.
I think Tucker’s ego and arrogance got the better of him last night, probably when Powell told them to stop bothering her.
I just watched the Tucker clip again and I think he is telling his audience things that would otherwise not be allowed to be broadcast on Fox because he couched it as potential conspiracy. In doing so, he was able to get away with playing a long clip of Sidney Powell at the presser laying out the facts. I don’t think that would have been allowed if it wasn’t framed in that manner. “Hey, we don’t know if this is true becasue she didn’t provide us the evidence yet, but listen to everything (and I mean everything, wink, wink) she is saying. We hope she does come forward eventually with that evidence. Boy if this is true, it’s the biggest scandal in history.”
“If this is true,” well Tucker, do you homework like the rest of us and find out if it is.
There is evidence out there. A lot of it is in the mathematical analysis of various results. They keep mentioning anomalies – results that are abnormal. A lot of that has been published on the web, talked about, but is above the brains of the general public. It is evidence but not hardcore proof in most minds – they will rationalize it away or not understand it. I saw an interview clip last night with a guy named Russ Ramsland who is working this stuff. I am sorry I can’t remember where I saw it but will work on finding it. He said they have identified tons and they just need a court order to get into the actual software. That is protected by proprietary laws and access is hard to get. Once having that, they will be able to pinpoint exactly the algorithms that switch votes, etc. That is the hardcore, indisputable proof. We have to be patient. Pray.
Epstein Island must have be a real busy place….de plane, de plane, boss.
It’s the timing that’s the tell.
Sidney gives an impressive presser and hours later Tucker shoots her down… in a moment where DJT needs to build momentum.
It’s a high stakes gamble. If Sidney falls short, Tucker will claim he stayed true and will give it to you straight no matter what. But the rest of us know exactly what he did….
and if Sidney comes through, Tucker will never be the same. It’s like the old adage, it takes a lifetime to build a reputation, and seconds to destroy it.
Perhaps Tucker would like to give the opposition, aka, Paul Ryan, Chris Wallace and Donna Brazille, time to shape the narrative before Sidney can present it to a court of law. Judges today are far more likely to rule based on public perception rather than the law.
Perhaps Tucker would like to give the opposition, aka, Paul Ryan, Chris Wallace and Donna Brazille, time to shape the narrative before Sidney can present it to a court of law. Judges today are far more likely to rule based on public perception rather than the law.
The coup that started before the last election has demonstrated that there is no real definition of ‘proof’. This coup proof has been demonstrated as anyone who has followed this site knows. But the proof has led nowhere. What is proof? Who determines this? It is frustrating because facts are not facts. Everything is politically determined.
EXCELLENT piece about Sidney Powell — quite a contrast to Sir Tucker of Vichy: https://stream.org/i-know-sidney-powell-she-is-telling-the-truth/
I must say SOMEONE is watching Tucker Carlson, but not me. I did not see this segment. I will not watch it. He would go after Dominion evidence and not what Sydney has compiled.
I KNOW he has lots of fans and I KNOW I’ll get flamed for this, but…I’ve known and said for years that Tucker Carlson is a mental lightweight and lacks substance. Don’t believe me? Go research and look at the privileged background and lack of qualifications of this ‘silver-spoon-in-mouth’ boy who was elevated to his career position mainly through his wealth from Swanson Foods family money.
Not saying he hasn’t done some occasional good in promoting our conservative ideals. Just saying he’s HUGELY overrated and unworthy of the idealization that some bestow upon him.
The Tell (why TC is a fraud).
He demands that SP come on his show and answer questions, when he should be demanding that the CEO of Dominion come out of hiding and defend his company against the charge of election theft. TC never once mentioned “Dominion”.
Just a week ago,TC was lecturing us how important honest elections are in a democracy.