The state visit by Chinese Chairman Xi Jinping in combination with USTR Jamieson Greer’s responsibilities within the U.S-China trade program, meant that Greer had to defer a visit to Mexico to work on the USMCA replacement. However, bilateral trade agreement discussions at a technical level remained on track and progressing during Xi’s visit.
The U.S. and Mexico delegations have now expanded the bilateral topics from 54 sections to 90 sections. This indicates significant agreement on the major components of the framework and now the smaller overlapping topics that enmesh with the bigger topics are brought in.
Greer shifted focus toward the Chinese trade aspects due to the timing of the Xi-Trump summit. USTR Jamieson Greer is expected to be returning to the Mexico trade talks in about a week.
For the interests of the Mexican side, the main focus is seeking favorable reductions in the section 232 tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles. However, the digital platform section and intellectual property is also a priority being negotiated by team USA.
MEXICO CITY, Sept 23 (Reuters) – The fourth round of trade talks between Mexico and the United States will not take place next week and could instead be held in October, a senior Mexican official said on Wednesday, as the two countries juggle a shifting diplomatic calendar.
Luis Rosendo Gutierrez, Mexico’s deputy economy minister for foreign trade, said the delay was due to scheduling conflicts, including Chinese President Xi Jinping’s visit to the United States and the upcoming G20 summit. Despite the pause in formal rounds, Gutierrez said technical coordination with the US Trade Representative’s Office (USTR) remains a “daily” occurrence.
The negotiations are seeking an interim bilateral bargain under which Mexico could win relief from some US tariffs while addressing US demands on areas including automotive content and Chinese investment.
“Our priority is reducing Section 232 tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles,” Gutierrez told reporters following the bi-national convention of business group the American Society of Mexico in Mexico City.
The negotiation agenda has expanded from 54 issues to nearly 90, which Gutierrez described as the natural evolution of complex topics such as digital platform regulation. (read more)
As USTR Greer noted in interviews Thursday and Friday, the U.S. is very comfortable with our current position toward Canada, even without any further trade discussion. We have expanded reciprocity tariffs against Canadian sectors, and we maintain baseline tariffs against core component manufactured goods, steel, aluminum and autos.
In January 2027 those baselines will be enjoined with 50% reciprocity tariffs on Canadian autos, thereby expanding the overall tariff policy. [U.S. will impose a 50% tariff on all Canadian automotive and steel imports, effective Jan. 1, 2027, after trade talks between the two nations collapsed. (source)]
There is no urgency to change anything toward Canada, and Greer is now focused on finishing a direct bilateral trade agreement with Mexico. Once that agreement with Mexico is confirmed, then the termination of the trilateral USMCA can be executed with virtually no disruption between the U.S and Mexico. All the friction points, pain and economic conflict will be unilateral on the Canadian side.

I think I might have to take a break from organizing the barn and have a beer.
I was gonna lance a boil on my old lady’s arse, but it can wait for another time so as I can join ya.
A beer and a nice cigar sounds good!
Must be barn season…having to do the ‘Chinese puzzle’ shuffling in order to get the barn walls and ceiling insulated…
That said…
Delicious reading the CBC analysis of Greer’s comments about being comfortable with the US/Canada state of trade negotiations, or rather the lack of it.
I would characterize it as confusion and disbelief…
Carney’s palms must be getting a little sweaty..
<Carney’s palms must be getting a little sweaty.>
Does he cover his palm?
Asking for a frond 🙂
It’s all going to plan for the scrawny little WEF puppet psycho-lizard green (fake) zealot CCP-lackey Fabian-disciple child-mutilation-enabling Satanist, imho.
The better the US does, the better for his personal stock portfolio. And for the vast majority of now US-domiciled Brookfield’s cashflow from its global conventional energy and other sector investments, even as their Green Grift in Canada dies off.
He’s succeeding at ever-closer collaboration with the the CCP (including military) , and increasing attacks on the USD’s reserve currency status via EU integration. This keeps his puppet masters (WEF and CCP) happy as he’s the primary facilitator of their need to destroy President Trump’s burgeoning new America, so they can finish their NWO execution.
And his new hints at the threat of US invasion keep the TDS-addled woketards up here firmly onside with his every move.
I feel it best not to underestimate his reach and influence. A quick recap of who he is and what he’s about (3 posts):
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/08/18/president-trump-pauses-50-percent-tariffs-against-canada-hours-before-effect/#comment-12760470
The ball will definitely be in Carney’s court when that happens. He just thinks he’s got Trump over a barrel. Just wait.
Despite the fact that I personally and the family business that provides me with the best job I’ve ever had will suffer severely when the border closes, I 100% support what President Trump is doing.
We’re at war. War always has casualties. My life will take a hit. And that’s okay.
I think Carney will come groveling back saying “that’s not what I meant, I can explain, take me back!”
I might be mistaken but….
Wasn’t President Xi’s gift to President Trump a substantial bronze casting of the eagle with a snake in his talons?
The near image on the Mexican flag?
What message are we to take away from that one wonders.
Hmmmmmm 🤔
If Canada can no longer serve as a conduit for all that made in China crap, what happens to it? Do they try to peddle it elsewhere? Send the unsold goods back to China? Throttle the Chinese imports in the pipeline? Cuz don’t wanna make Panda sad.
Imagine if Canada actually paid for their own defense, vs the measly sum they contribute to NATO. Finally cleared the 2% hurdle this year, after missing it for the last 40 YEARS. Look at the chart below (hint, Canada is tied for LAST place):
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-nato-defence-spending-9.7142615
Easy to subsidize your lumber prices, and a host of welfare programs, when Uncle Sugar pays for your defense. With an “ally” like that, who needs enemies?
Eh?
So once USMCA is ended, what happens to all of the products that currently enter the US duty free from Canada??
Carney thinks his new buddies in the EU & China will buy them and bail him out. I think he is in for a suprise.
“All the friction points, pain and economic conflict will be unilateral on the Canadian side.” I love that part!
Trump’s tariff vow won the White House — now it may cost him Congress | New York Post
During his political ascent in 2015 and 2016, Trump exploited issues that revealed a disconnect between popular and elite opinion, and trade was prominent among them.
His protectionism — expressed in pungent and excoriating terms — poached traditional Democratic ideological territory and appealed to the working-class voters, allowing him to crash the traditional Democratic “Blue Wall” states.
In sheer political terms, what could go wrong.
Well, nothing — until he got his way.
It turns out that Liberation Day was the beginning of the end for any appreciable political support for his tariff policy.
The assumption has usually been that the politics of tariffs favor protectionism — the benefits are very visible and focused for specific sectors and businesses that are highly committed to maintaining them, while the costs are widely dispersed among people who won’t care so much.
In this case, though, the logic has been turned on its head: The costs felt by people with no direct stake in protectionism are tanking support for the tariffs overall.
On top of this, there’s the fact that Trump won his second White House term promising to reduce prices — and import duties increase them.
The Yale Budget Lab estimates the costs to households at about $1,000 a year.
The shambolic and arbitrary rollout of the tariffs, as well as the dubious legal basis for many of them, hasn’t helped, either.
According to a poll that the libertarian Cato Institute conducted with Morning Consult, 74% of Americans say the tariffs increased the prices they pay, including 66% of Republicans.
After the latest trade spat with Canada, a Politico/Public First poll found that 56% of Americans think the tariffs on our northern neighbor were “wrong.”
According to a CBS/YouGov survey, people prefer a candidate who opposes Trump’s tariffs over one who supports them by 26 percentage points.
Democratic Senate candidates are promising to reverse Trump’s tariffs; even the card-carrying protectionist Sherrod Brown is critical.
And some Republican candidates in states with lots of trade with Canada have dissented from the trade war with Our Friendly Neighbor to the North.
The Midwest is a trouble spot for the GOP in the midterms, and it’s not hard to understand why.
China cut its purchases of US farm products in retaliation for Trump’s tariffs, and the farm sector has been slammed.
Even if Trump’s theory of the tariffs is correct — that higher import duties will lead to re-industrialization — the policy involves immediate disruption and increased costs in exchange for a protectionism-driven build-out that will take years to be fully achieved.
Long before then — indeed, by January — an opposition congressional majority hostile to the president and his tariffs may be entrenched in Washington.
In politics, it’s often “careful what you wish for.”
Especially if that involves imposing higher prices on an inflation-fatigued public.
X: @RichLowry
https://share.google/O0E4ibEBUzdSL7WCs
NY Post haven’t studied Sundance, have they?
Owned by the Murdochs. Who hate tariffs. Propaganda on all sides
Want to know why Mexico is still at the table while Canada isn’t? Mexico just keeps adding products to their list that used to be made in Canadian. Smart job Pedro!
But arent Syrupeans jouning the EU and hugging China…except defense?