Prepare to Discover That Michael Flynn WAS NOT Unmasked – But Everyone Else Was…

It appears we are about to find out if one of my long-standing theories about surveillance of Michael Flynn is correct.  Flynn was not “unmasked”, because he was the direct target.

For three years the official media account of how the intelligence community gained the transcript of incoming National Security Adviser Michael Flynn talking to Ambassador Sergey Kisliyak on December 29th, 2016, surrounded “incidental collection” as a result of contact with an agent of a foreign power.

Meaning the Flynn call was picked up as the U.S. intelligence apparatus was conducting surveillance on Russian Ambassador Kisliyak.

If this version of events were accurate (it’s not), it would fall under FISA-702 collection: the monitoring of a foreign agent (Kislyak) who has contact with a U.S. person (Flynn).

In order to review the identity of the U.S. person, a process called ‘unmasking’, a 702 submission must be made. As NSA Director Rogers said: that submission, the unmasking, leaves a paper/electronic trail.  However, I do not think that is what happened, here’s why:

Back in 2017 Senator Lindsey Graham questioned former DAG Sally Yates and former DNI James Clapper.  Within the questioning, Sally Yates tipped her hand.  There was never an unmasking of Flynn because Flynn was a target; it was not incidental collection. WATCH:

.

Sally Yates doesn’t directly say Flynn was a target, but by now we all know he was a target of the FBI investigation.  As a result of Flynn being the actual target he would be directly identified within the intelligence documents because the investigation would be about him, and not incidental. But there’s more…

In the three years following this testimony, there was nothing that would deliver the answer as to: who unmasked General Michael Flynn? The reason why is simple, Flynn wasn’t unmasked – because he was the target of authorized active surveillance.

Here’s another way we know.

♦ First, Lisa Page and Peter Strzok were watching that hearing where Senator Lindsey Graham was questioning Sally Yates and James Clapper.  As they discussed in their text messages the issue of “unmasking” is irrelevant.  “incidental collection” is the “incorrect narrative”:

The “incidental collection” is an “incorrect narrative” because the collection was not incidental.  Flynn was actively being monitored.  Flynn was an active target in an ongoing FBI counterintelligence investigation.  Flynn was THE target.

♦ Second, more evidence of Flynn under active surveillance is found in the Mueller report where the special prosecutor outlines that Flynn was under an active investigation prior to the phone call with Ambassador Kislyak:

Mary McCord was the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the DOJ National Security Division, after John Carlin left in October of 2016.  McCord knew about the active FBI investigation of General Flynn. [McCord was also the person who Sally Yates took with her to the White House to confront White House Counsel Don McGahn about the Flynn call and FBI interview.]

It is now admitted by public document releases that Flynn was under investigation during the President-elect transition period when the Kislyak phone call took place.

Put it all together and…. (1) There was never an unmasking request because the collection was not incidental…. (2) Because the intercept was not incidental. (3) Because the intercept was part of the multi-year FBI ongoing investigation of Michael Flynn which included surveillance.

If my three-year hunch is correct, the lack of incidental collection is why FISA-702 doesn’t apply; and why there’s no paper trail to a Flynn unmasking request.  The intercept was not ‘incidental‘ because the intercept was the result of direct monitoring and authorized surveillance being conducted on Michael Flynn.

However, the unmasking of Trump campaign officials as noted by the concerns of Devin Nunes; which directly relates to the documents that Ric Grenell may have just presented to Attorney General Bill Barr; is an even bigger issue.

Because Flynn was an active target of the FBI counterintelligence investigation, anyone who came in contact with the target would be identified as U.S. Person 1, 2, 3 etc.

Anyone and everyone who came in contact with Flynn would be masked in the intelligence reports; Flynn would not.  So when there are mountains of “unmaskings” of Trump campaign officials, those would apply to anyone who came in contact with Flynn.  That is what shocked Devin Nunes as he outlined the unmasking requests:

March 27, 2017, then House Intelligence Committee Chairman, Devin Nunes, held a brief press conference and stated he was provided intelligence reports brought to him by unnamed sources including ‘significant information’ about President-Elect Trump and his transition team.

These reports included unmaskings of President Trump campaign officials; and included Donald Trump himself….  You know what that means:

1.) …”On numerous occasions the [Obama] intelligence community incidentally collected information about U.S. citizens involved in the Trump transition.”

2.)  “Details about U.S. persons associated with the incoming administration; details with little or no apparent foreign intelligence value were widely disseminated in intelligence community reporting.”

3.) “Third, I have confirmed that additional names of Trump transition members were unmasked.”

4.) “Fourth and finally, I want to be clear; none of this surveillance was related to Russia, or the investigation of Russian activities, or of the Trump team.

“The House Intelligence Committee will thoroughly investigate surveillance and its subsequent dissemination, to determine a few things here that I want to read off:”

  • “Who was aware of it?”
  • “Why it was not disclosed to congress?”
  • “Who requested and authorized the additional unmasking?”
  • “Whether anyone directed the intelligence community to focus on Trump associates?”
  • “And whether any laws, regulations or procedures were violated?”

“I have asked the Directors of the FBI, NSA and CIA to expeditiously comply with my March 15th letter -that you all received a couple of weeks ago- and to provide a full account of these surveillance activities.”

.

Does that make sense now?

When candidate Trump brought Lt. General Michael Flynn into the campaign, he essentially brought in a person who was under an ongoing FBI investigation.

Everyone that Flynn then came in contact with then became a “U.S. Person” identified in the intelligence reports.  Those U.S. Persons were then unmasked.

That’s why so many unmaskings.

Flynn was the infection that authorized additional persons to be reviewed and unmasked. The research therein shows up to NSA Director Mike Rogers when the NSA auditor notes a significant uptick in FBI searches of the NSA database. From Rogers position this is what he would see:

However, what Rogers would not see is the unmasking taking place at FBI for the people being searched.

This video of questioning again by Senator Graham shows the dynamic. (A) Rogers notes the FBI would likely have more incidental collection and subsequent unmasking as an aspect of their investigative search functions; and (B) He wouldn’t know because that’s outside of his compartment.

.

If my long-standing hunch is correct, we’ll soon find out that: (1) Michael Flynn was the walking surveillance infection; (2) those who Flynn came into contact with will cross-reference to the 702 “About” queries; and (3) the FBI reports on those Flynn contacts will contain the unmasked names of the various Trump campaign officials that Barr might soon release.

The FBI did not need a Title-1 FISA surveillance warrant against Flynn because they were already conducting regular Title-3 surveillance on him as a potential domestic national security risk. Thus it was all Flynn’s calls being monitored, not just Sergey Kislyak.

We’ll soon find out if my hunch has been correct…

This entry was posted in AG Bill Barr, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, CIA, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, FBI, IG Report Comey, IG Report FISA Abuse, IG Report McCabe, Legislation, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Russia, Spygate, Spying, THE BIG UGLY, Uncategorized, USA, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

640 Responses to Prepare to Discover That Michael Flynn WAS NOT Unmasked – But Everyone Else Was…

  1. Jerry Joe says:

    Only marginally, tangentially related, but perhaps to the origins of why Ozero was selected to head this racket: Rod Blagojevich – sale of a senate seat – Mueller signed his arrest warrant – “play all the tapes” – tapes never played – commuted sentence now looking more and more understandable. Maybe someone was compromised from the beginning?

    Liked by 9 people

  2. dasantacroce says:

    Always excellent reading.

    Liked by 7 people

  3. johneb18 / @johneb18 says:

    0bama’s and Brenan’s desperation fear and dread of Flynn running rampant in a Trump presidency and exposing everything they had been doing is the reason they tasked Halper with generating/creating pseudo-derogatory ‘intelligence,’ using the Gen Flynn trip to Russia as the pretext to smear and malign him in the Mainstream Enemedia at minimum, and establish a ‘legal’ pretext to spy on him and the Campaign.

    This would have been December 2015.

    And 0bama telling the incoming President Trump that Flynn was bad news and to avoid him just adds to the depth of his complicity.

    Liked by 8 people

    • Zimbalistjunior says:

      Flynn was targeted in the svetlana lokhava scam already in Feb 2014 predating any trump connection.
      This was one of many illegal dirty tricks conducted during the obama admin including wholesale illegal surveillance and consequent blackmail of US congressmen.
      Then again, dirty tricks have been a part of US politics for decades. Check out the Stefan Halper biography.

      Liked by 7 people

    • 4sure says:

      Obama was in on the Flynn Frame up from the get go. Obama should be hanged for treason. The POS is an avowed Muslim terrorist who hates America and Israel.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Scott B. says:

    I expect the media to ignore all evidence, and focus on two points:
    1. Since Gen. Flynn was not unmasked, Obama and his administration are therefore fully exonerated.
    2. Since Gen. Flynn was under investigation, he is therefore guilty of something.

    Liked by 11 people

    • mrsqt says:

      You forget #3… (when ALL else fails resort to THIS)

      Orange Man Bad.

      The end.

      Liked by 5 people

    • GenEarly says:

      “Lavrentiy Beria, the most ruthless and longest-serving secret police chief in Joseph Stalin’s reign of terror in Russia and Eastern Europe, bragged that he could prove criminal conduct on anyone, even the innocent.
      “Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime” was Beria’s infamous boast. He served as deputy premier from 1941 until Stalin’s death in 1953, supervising the expansion of the gulags and other secret detention facilities for political prisoners.” Oxford Eagle

      Of course nothing like this could never happen Here in the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave. No Siree.

      Liked by 6 people

      • Um, well, actually, my friend, Montana closed off homesteading many winters ago now. So there’s really no more free land any longer in America. But you can still live here if you’re brave.

        And strong, and smart, and clever, and savvy, and skilled, and productive, and Spirited, and loving, and honest…

        Especially all of the above. And that is all. 0{;-)o[

        Like

    • guest4ever says:

      Wish I could file a class-action lawsuit against ALL the MSM. I certainly have been damaged by their behavior!!!

      Liked by 3 people

      • Good Lawful idea, my friend! Much of the prep work can actually be taken-up and done by an ordinary non-lawyer, btww. Attention to detail as well as willingness to stand on the Oath are key – and will be tested, mind you.

        One thought – since such a suit should result in 100% forfeiture of all assets on conviction, what is the net worth of any of those rusting corporate hulks in the first place, these days? Viewerships are reportedly at an all-time low while hits to Bing!(ick), Google(ugh), DuckDuckGo(soso), Qwant(better), Millionshort(TOOLS!), Gbiru(total indie) etc (all uncensored Web search engines of great power, in one way and/or another) are at record levels.

        So: The Broadcast Industry that assailed us all with lies upon lies for years upon years is now effin’ dying. Suicided by its own paid-for lies. Therefore revenue derived from such a litigation, after fees and divvied-up by 360,000,000 (more/less) portions, just might put some pennies in all our hands. A little pre-filing research on the defendants’ net worth and possibly some preliminary injunctions to freeze assets in place during the proceedings /might/ be inorder and certainly would keep the snakes from selling all but the shell off for pocket cash in /their/ pockets.

        Not that Yours Truly’d decry the effort, nonetheless! GOOD HUNTING to you! And that is all. 0{;-)o[

        Like

    • Issy says:

      Scott B, I expect you’re right. Obama has already come out with the rule of law thing, he pled guilty.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Obama’s Shadow Government Just-Us Department functions like those of its totalitarian antecedents, in that they commonly hide exculpatory evidence and find enemies of the State to be guilty, or coerce them into pleading guilty. Should that hidden exculpatory evidence subsequently come to light, proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused was innocent all along, the judge can insist that the condemned was found, or pleaded, guilty, and then accuse them of perjury:

        “If the accused was NOT GUILTY, why did he LIE and plead GUILTY? What was he trying to hide?”

        Liked by 1 person

        • Issy says:

          Exactly, I have never heard of this happening. It may have, but this is a high profile case and there is proof he was framed.

          It’s obvious the judge wants to punish him and drag this out to keep him from talking.

          Like

  5. 335blues says:

    I am so, so sick of these smug jerks hiding behind “I can’t disclose that in an open setting.”
    In America, the American people are in charge. And these self important idiots are able to
    label information “secret” that the American people as stewards of the government may be
    entitled to have without subject to rules that dictate what should, and what should not be labeled “secret”. If there are rules, they are either insufficient, or they are not being used.
    I realize there is information that is justified in being handled in a secret fashion.
    But some in our government are abusing the process to hide their behavior.
    This is a big part of the reason why we are in this situation.
    Why aren’t appropriate standards in place for the use of ‘classifying information’ that would
    preclude these criminals a shield to hide behind? The key word is ‘appropriate’.
    Scum like Yates and Clapper easily break the
    law and then hide behind a ‘classified information’ declaration.
    How was that declaration approved? Do enough, and the correct people have
    knowledge of that declaration to prevent abuse?
    I hope that one of the changes that come out of this attempted coup is a needed
    revision and enforcement of the rules for classifying information.
    In America, the people are entitled to know everything we can so we can keep
    our government from lying to us, and keep scum like Yates and Clapper from being
    empowered to attempt a coup of a legally elected President.

    Liked by 6 people

    • Orygun says:

      The other is ongoing investigation. Between “national security” and “ongoing investigation” they can hide their crimes indefinitely. Throw in some compromised judges and you are on your way to easy street.

      Liked by 5 people

  6. Arrrrg, so frustrating. If they used a title 3 search vs a title 1 search, doesn’t it mean that the Obama admin is “clean” on this? I could almost hear them say “we opened this up because of our concern of the Flynn/Turkey relationship blah blah blah” and there will be democrats that will point and scream that what they did was “legal” and “justified”. I understand they still unmasked just about everyone that was involved in the title 3 (still a crime) but what else can we tie to Barry and his cohorts? We all know there is more and I NEED SOMEONE TO GO TO JAIL OVER THIS.

    Liked by 2 people

  7. ncedgar says:

    So, no defensive briefing to candidate Trump or President Elect Trump regarding the potential Russian actor? That is interesting.

    Liked by 7 people

  8. IMO worthy of Sundance ! (stolen from him?) Large hi-res graphic of Spkygate players. Very zoomable. Remove the asterisks if you want to view but needs a large screen to appreciate. Can’t remember where I found it so if someone wants to credit the source I would be greatful.

    *https://i-uv.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/spygate-1.jpg*

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Bogeyfree says:

    Question for AG Barr and Grenell……

    Has…….

    1) the missing 302
    2) the missing FIB report to gang of eight about Flynn NOT lying
    3) the Wiener Laptop Contents
    4) the 33K missing emails
    5) Mifsud’s phones
    6) the Seth Rich Investigation paperwork that Ty Clevenger has been searching for for 3 years
    7) the 47 Hammer Hard Drives turned in by WB Dennis Montgomery back in 2015

    Always been in the DOJ NSD, where there is NO IG oversight???

    Honest question Mr. Barr

    Maybe Mr. Grenell can lend some insight on this question?

    Liked by 4 people

    • CentralTexian says:

      It has been reported that Obama warned president-elect Trump not to hire Flynn during conversation within 48 hours after the election (Nov 10 2016?). Trump decided to appoint Flynn as his National Security Advisor about a week later on Nov 17. Do you think Obama was “baiting” Trump to hire Flynn into a significant post knowing that would allow unrestrained unmasking of anyone talking to Flynn, and thus creating a direct path for the “Russia Collusion” narrative, knowing full well that Flynn was already under a counter intelligence investigation?

      Liked by 3 people

    • humaweiner says:

      Seth Rich was hit by the Pakistani IT Team that was shagging Debbie Schultz.

      Like

      • William the Comptroller says:

        Imaging DWS in bed with that poker-face and husky monotonic man-voice engaged in pillow talk…. maybe reason why she became a Lahore-whore. Hee hubbie is a crook too!

        Like

    • guest4ever says:

      THAT would be a GREAT question/s for Mr. Grenell!!!! Maybe he can be emailed?

      Like

  10. It’s been said many times before, but PDJT is the only man in America who could withstand, and potentially defeat, the evil machinery of the Deep State.

    No one else besides PDJT has both (1) the wherewithal/power/intelligence/his own machinery/extreme wealth/allies/etc. PLUS also had (2) a squeaky clean history (no skeletons in the closet).

    Flynn had the squeaky clean history, but was more vulnerable on the first point.

    Liked by 9 people

    • Orygun says:

      It takes a special kind of love for your country and its people to attempt something of this magnitude. For at least 30 years I wondered why no one would attempt to clean this mess up. There have been outspoken people with wealth and influence but they just grew silent over time and now I know why.

      President Trump is one remarkable fella and I have to laugh at the people sitting at their keyboards in the security of their homes and trying to second guess what he is doing or not doing. We are so lucky to have him and the world knows it.

      Liked by 8 people

  11. Troublemaker10 says:

    Liked by 2 people

  12. SereneMarine says:

    Every person with a Top Secret (TS) gets an FBI background investigation every 5 years. It would be interesting to know when LTG Flynn’s last BI was completed prior to 2015. Further, who reviewed his completed BI to adjudicate his continued holding of a TS. If anything suspect is found, a Notice of Intent to Deny letter is given to the individual so he/she can get the BI report in order to submit an appeal.

    Liked by 2 people

  13. coolmamie says:

    I am trying to stifle my own disappointment, but unless the Flynn 2014 surveillance was illegal, it seems this news is good for the bad guys.

    Please tell me I am wrong.

    Like

    • Bogeyfree says:

      My hope is Grenell is laying out a pattern of long term surveillance.

      First – massive unmaskings with leaking

      Second – massive alleged FIB / NSA Contractor Surveillance from 2012-2016

      Third – flipping a foreign surveillance tool to a domestic surveillance tool in order to spy and gather information on Americans for LEVERAGE.

      When you show a long term pattern of abuse it makes it easier for Joe Q Public to understand.

      Now add in if there they can show this acquired leverage was used in connection with money laundering (Think Mexico Guns, Ukraine, missing billions from DOD or State Dept as possible things to look into more) or something with RICO ties, then IMO that would pretty much do it.

      Liked by 4 people

    • gsonFIT says:

      I think the FISC actions last December tells us Obama admin has issues. We need to fix a lot of things so I am hoping for a positive outcome and future.

      Like

    • lemontree says:

      They knew Flynn’s meetings with Russians were approved, they knew his phone calls were appropriate. What was their reason for continued spying except to hurt PE Trump.

      Like

  14. FPCHmom says:

    Liked by 1 person

    • Bogeyfree says:

      And I’d start within the DOJ NSD department as that is the only group that has NO IG oversight.

      So for Mr. Grenell has that been the little “hidey hole” all along??

      Liked by 3 people

  15. humaweiner says:

    One would assume that current & former G-men in the DC area are retaining criminal defense attorneys and researching about the dating rituals in federal prison.

    Liked by 1 person

  16. Ironclaw says:

    What’s being described is parallel construction. The attempt to go back and build different chains of evidence that make the original sin much less benign.

    Like

  17. Soooo… now the interesting question arises… WHAT WERE THE PREDICATES for the original investigation of Gen Mike Flynn?

    Liked by 2 people

  18. Brian Baker says:

    This is why Obama is so unnerved about Flynn “getting off scot-free.”
    They had to make Flynn a criminal out of necessity. If Flynn is innocent of doing anything illegal then the Obama regime were spying on him explicitly for political purposes.

    Liked by 2 people

  19. daninbluemd says:

    Excellent piece. Makes perfect sense.

    Like

  20. Hoop says:

    By December – the FBI was closing Crossfire Razor. They had had no evidence of a crime… remember?

    Strzok was surprised that the file was still open first week of Jan … said something about the FBI’s incompetence…. ??? something.. something….

    PLUS – this call made it to the Obama White House pretty quickly… not sure if the FBI brought it to Obama or his CIA/NSA spies brought it over…

    I think the Flynn data did come from an Unmasking event and NOT the FBI Crossfire Razor action.

    Like

  21. theasdgamer says:

    “Because the intercept was part of the multi-year FBI ongoing investigation of Michael Flynn which included surveillance.”

    Because the intercept was part of the multi-year FBI ongoing investigation of Michael Flynn which included surveillance.

    Because the intercept was part of the multi-year FBI ongoing investigation of Michael Flynn which included surveillance.

    Liked by 1 person

  22. David Farrar says:

    So Clapper lied to Congress when he said it was a third-party incidental recording of Flynn/Kislyak conversation?

    Liked by 1 person

    • crasey says:

      Not necessarily. Authorization collection of Kislyak would make Flynn recorded incidentally as US person 1. Authorized collection of Flynn under Crossfire Razor would identify both Flynn and Kislyak without masking. How the collector describes the collection depends on who writes up the collection and who they send it to. So the DNI sees it as incidental collection of Kislyak and the FBI counter intel sees as targeted collection of Crossfire Razor.

      Liked by 1 person

  23. Pew-Anon says:

    Top-tier analysis as always. Flynn is turning out to be the cornerstone of Russiagate. As each of our previous theories are confirmed, with the release of each new piece of evidence, it seems more and more serendipitous for the Obama deeps state that President elect Trump picked Flynn for NSA. What a break for them, right? Had he picked someone else, then the entire Russiagate construct, as we now know it, would have been a nullity.

    …hmmm…

    Like

    • Walley says:

      when Flynn was proposed to be on the NSC, somebody had responsibility to inform PDJT that he was under investigation. It was postulated that he was a security risk.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Pew-Anon says:

        But what if PT had picked McMaster to start with? Then what would have happened to Russiagate? Seems like quite a stroke of fortune for Obama that PT picked Flynn. Again…

        hmmm…

        Like

    • In retrospect, it now seems that Obama’s warning (to Trump) about Flynn was some sort of “reverse psychology” ploy:

      “If I tell him to AVOID Flynn, he’ll do the OPPOSITE, and we will have a way to spy directly on Trump’s inner circle”

      Like

      • twinkiethekid2 says:

        How does that work with Flynn being seen with Trump long before this? I mean, He’s already got the job probably based on what he’s already told djt. Why would Obama try the Jedi mind trick to get him to hire Flynn when it’s already a done deal? Also, some are postulating that Rogers was at TT for an interview. Calling BS on that!

        Like

        • Remember when Mitt sat down for dinner with DJT? People said HE was going to get a cabinet position, but we know how THAT turned out, don’t we?

          With The Donald, you NEVER KNOW exactly what he’s going to do, until he DOES it. So, yeah, it’s entirely possible OZero thought he might want to poke the bear.

          Like

          • twinkiethekid2 says:

            I guess he f’d up on that too.

            Let’s put a requisition in for rope now so we don’t have a shortage…

            Like

  24. bonkti says:

    Wonder if there was a FISA warrant issued based on Kerry’s facilitating Iranian actions. Two steps would take in a lot of lowlifes.

    Liked by 1 person

  25. gsonFIT says:

    This clip sounds a bit different 3 years and one obamagate later

    Liked by 2 people

  26. Clapper is a weak link. Charge him with lying under oath (video tapes are the proof) and he’llsqueal like a pig and flip in a heartbeat. I don’t believe he wants to live out the rest of his days in prison as the Mr. Magoo that keeps dropping the soap in the shower.

    Liked by 1 person

  27. Fools Gold says:

    Bingo. Young man I think you just cracked a Big Nut! Way to go! Those right here is what keeps me coming back here daily for my briefings and those patriots who the damn truth!

    Like

    • Fools Gold says:

      I meant to say what you’re doing right here at CTH is what keeps me coming back for my daily briefings as well as the patriots here who give a damn about truth and justice.

      Like

  28. 2smartforlibs says:

    If there was already a FISA on him that would explain a lot.

    Liked by 1 person

    • gsonFIT says:

      I bet they had a FISA from the dinner with Putin that Russia Today sponsored. He received prior approval for that trip, but that is just the type of fake due process Team Obama thrived from.

      Obama Admin rationalized their injustices by reliving the oppression their people received from a villainous America. /s/. Their base is also easily duped because they choose to make decisions from their feelings and not their brains.

      Like

  29. Ron says:

    Sullivan is protecting his brothers in crime. Time for bias Judges to be removed ASAP.

    Like

  30. brenrod says:

    if Flynn was under direct investigation didn’t the doj have a duty to inform candidate and president trump that a “spy” had entered his campaign?

    Like

    • gsonFIT says:

      I think their duty is to be consistent with both campaigns which they were not. I also think they will claim O tried to warn them at the Executive’s transition meeting.

      Unfortunately we really do need a special counsel so that we can address issues like the one you bring up with laws. I just hope that Ric Grenell burns it all down first

      Like

    • lackawaxen123 says:

      direct investigation doesn’t give a free pass to tap a targets phones … a warrant has to be issued … no warrant was ever issued … regular or FISA … so he was unmasked as incidental …

      Like

  31. I’d like a chunk of Sundance’s time management skills. I continually wonder how SD has time to articulate these “deep thought” research & analysis pieces, while staying current on a hyper-news cycle, and still putting out regular spot-on daily thought pieces.

    Liked by 1 person

  32. I’d like a chunk of Sundance’s time management skills. I continually wonder how SD has time to articulate these “deep thought” research & analysis pieces, while staying current on a hyper-news cycle, and still putting out regular spot-on daily thought pieces.

    Like

  33. nobodyspecial1958 says:

    Now the question I want to know is why Paul Ryan aided and abetted this outrageous intrusion and will he be exposed for the traitor he is? He is one that needs sanctioned in my opinion.

    Like

  34. Rocket says:

    How could they possibly justify opening, and then continuing a CI investigation on Flynn if Flynn’s contacts with his Russian counterparts was normal and to be expected (e.g. as a member of the incoming administration)?

    We do know that Podesta was making big bucks as an unregistered Russian agent. Hunter Biden and Pelosi’s son were making big bucks peddling influence in the Ukraine. Adam Schiff supposedly was making $$$ off of Ukrainian arms sales, and of course Hillary, presiding over the sale of one fifth of our Uranium to Russia brought in about $147 million to the Clinton Foundation.

    If nothing else, a straight shooter like Flynn would be a threat to all those traitors, and it wasn’t anything bad Flynn had done … it was what he MIGHT do in exposing and prosecuting the dirty dealers from the Obama regime.

    Like

    • gsonFIT says:

      They fired him because of the Iran Nuke deal.

      Like

      • Rocket says:

        Explain how an Obama administration illegally spying up and unmasking an American citizen has anything to do to Flynn later putting Iran on notice against any dangerous military action.

        How is your statement not non sequitur?

        Explain.

        Like

        • gsonFIT says:

          My written statement might not have made my point. Flynn was turned around with Obama soon after he became DNI just because he was such a straight shooter. About the Iranian Nuclear deal as well as Asad and Syria. My point was O admin had identified him as someone that did not support O admin Middle east policy back in 2014.

          I feel like the O admin started spying around 2012, and this included 2012 election. Perhaps not to as large an extent but is was a beginning. Also crazy to see that Obama had PDJT in oval office 48 hours after 2016 election warning him not to hire Flynn. Our thoughts are along the same path but I think Flynn was targeted earlier

          Like

  35. lackawaxen123 says:

    tin foil hat off Sundance … being a “target” of the FBI doesn’t get them a “free” pass to tap your phones .. a warrant to do so must still be issued by a judge … and since no regular warrant was issued then it would have to be a FISA and since that didn’t happen he was unmasked …

    Like

  36. sudsy49 says:

    Sundance was just proven correct by Andy McCarthy on Fox with Dana Perino. Andy said Flynn was not unmasked, he was the target of an investigation launched to provide rationale and coverup for previous intelligence gathering against Trump.

    Like

  37. mdmnmdllr says:

    Er … I believe the docs Ric Grennell delivered today said otherwise in re: Gen. Flynn.

    Flynn was indeed unmasked, many times by many people … AND so was **everyone** else.

    And given everyone who did that unmasking, is there at this point ANY doubt that that trail reached all the way into the Oval Office? Hm.

    Like

  38. All of the Obama including him and Hillary , John Kerry and all including Susan Rice find her documents in the Library where Obama has all that sealed for five years. Needs to be u sealed as well as Biden’s all of them prosecuted and sent to Prison

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s