ICIG Whistleblower Form Recently Modified to Permit Complaint “Heard From Others”…

Folks, this “Ukraine Whistleblower” event was a pre-planned event.  As we begin to understand the general outline of how the Schiff Dossier was assembled, we are now starting to get into the specifics.  First discovered by researcher Stephen McIntyre, there is now evidence surfacing showing the ICIG recently created an entirely new ‘whistleblower complaint form’ that specifically allowed for the filing of complaints “heard from others“.

Prior to the current “whistleblower complaint” the Intelligence Community Inspector General did not accept whistle-blower claims without first hand knowledge.  However, the ICIG revised the protocol in August 2019 allowing for the EXACT type of complaint now registered from the CIA whistleblower.

The IGIC revision was made at the same time HPSCI Chairman Adam Schiff was tweeting in August about President Trump, Rudy Giuliani and holding back funding pending assistance with political opponents.  Note the Date: (link)

The timing here is far too coincidental.  This was a set-up.

Sean Davis from the Federalist is also hot on the trail.

Sean Davis – Between May 2018 and August 2019, the intelligence community secretly eliminated a requirement that whistleblowers provide direct, first-hand knowledge of alleged wrongdoings. This raises questions about the intelligence community’s behavior regarding the August submission of a whistleblower complaint against President Donald Trump. The new complaint document no longer requires potential whistleblowers who wish to have their concerns expedited to Congress to have direct, first-hand knowledge of the alleged wrongdoing that they are reporting.

The brand new version of the whistleblower complaint form, which was not made public until after the transcript of Trump’s July 25 phone call with the Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and the complaint addressed to Congress were made public, eliminates the first-hand knowledge requirement and allows employees to file whistleblower complaints even if they have zero direct knowledge of underlying evidence and only “heard about [wrongdoing] from others.”

The internal properties of the newly revised “Disclosure of Urgent Concern” form, which the intelligence community inspector general (ICIG) requires to be submitted under the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act (ICWPA), show that the document was uploaded on September 24, 2019, at 4:25 p.m., just days before the anti-Trump complaint was declassified and released to the public. The markings on the document state that it was revised in August 2019, but no specific date of revision is disclosed. (read more)

President Trump announced Joseph Macguire as the Acting ODNI on August 8th, 2019. (link)  The CIA operative “whistle-blower” letter to Adam Schiff and Richard Burr was on August 12th (link).   Immediately following this letter, the ICIG rules and requirements for “whistle-blowers” was modified, allowing hearsay complaints. On August 28th Adam Schiff begins tweeting about the construct of the complaint.

As Stephen McIntyre notes: “it appears almost certain that, subsequent to the CIA operative “WB” complaint, the DNI introduced a brand new Urgent Disclosure Form which offered a previously unavailable alternative to report allegations with no personal knowledge.”

The prior IGIC complaint form can be viewed via the Wayback Machine – SEE HERE and the new IGIC complaint form that allows hearsay can be compared HERE.

The CIA whistleblower complaint is likely the VERY FIRST complaint allowed using the new IGIC protocol and standard.  Taken in combination with the timeline of the August 12th notification letter to Schiff and Burr and the Schiff tweet of August 28th, there’s little room for doubt this Ukraine whistleblower impeachment effort was pre-planned.

Additionally, this coordinated effort ties back-in Intelligence Community Inspector General, Michael K Atkinson.

The center of the Lawfare Alliance influence was/is the Department of Justice National Security Division, DOJ-NSD. It was the DOJ-NSD running the Main Justice side of the 2016 operations to support Operation Crossfire Hurricane and FBI agent Peter Strzok. It was also the DOJ-NSD where the sketchy legal theories around FARA violations (Sec. 901) originated.

The Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) is Michael K Atkinson. ICIG Atkinson is the official who accepted the ridiculous premise of a hearsay ‘whistle-blower‘ complaint; an intelligence whistleblower who was “blowing-the-whistle” based on second hand information of a phone call without any direct personal knowledge, ie ‘hearsay‘.

Michael K Atkinson was previously the Senior Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General of the National Security Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ-NSD) in 2016. That makes Atkinson senior legal counsel to John Carlin and Mary McCord who were the former heads of the DOJ-NSD in 2016 when the stop Trump operation was underway.


[Irony Reminder: The DOJ-NSD was purposefully under no IG oversight. In 2015 the OIG requested oversight and it was Sally Yates who responded with a lengthy 58 page legal explanation saying, essentially, ‘nope – not allowed.’ (PDF HERE) All of the DOJ is subject to oversight, except the NSD.]

Put another way, Michael Atkinson was the lawyer for the same DOJ-NSD players who: (1) lied to the FISA court (Judge Rosemary Collyer) about the 80% non compliant NSA database abuse using FBI contractors; (2) filed the FISA application against Carter Page; and (3) used FARA violations as tools for political surveillance and political targeting.

Yes, that means Michael Atkinson was Senior Counsel for the DOJ-NSD, at the very epicenter of the political weaponization and FISA abuse.

Immediately after the Carter Page FISA warrant is approved, in the period where DOJ-NSD head John Carlin has given his notice of intent to leave but not yet left, inside those specific two weeks, the National Security Division of the DOJ tells the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) they have been breaking the law. The NSD specifically inform the court they are aware of contractors who have been using FISA 702(16)(17) database search queries to extract information on political candidates.

DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz has looked into the FISA application used against U.S. Person Carter Page. Additionally, U.S. Attorney John Durham is said to be looking at the intelligence communities’ use of systems for spying and surveillance.

If the DOJ-NSD exploitation of the NSA database, and/or DOJ-NSD FISA abuse, and/or DOJ-NSD FARA corruption were ever to reach sunlight, current ICIG Atkinson -as the lawyer for the process- would be under a lot of scrutiny for his involvement.

Yes, that gives current ICIG Michael Atkinson a strong and corrupt motive to participate with the Schiff/Lawfare impeachment objective.

Atkinson’s conflict-of-self-interest, and/or possible blackmail upon him by deep state actors who most certainly know his compromise, likely influenced his approach to this whistleblower complaint. That would explain why the Dept. of Justice Office of Legal Counsel so strongly rebuked Atkinson’s interpretation of his responsibility with the complaint.

In the Justice Department’s OLC opinion, they point out that Atkinson’s internal justification for accepting the whistleblower complaint was poor legal judgement. [See Here] I would say Atkinson’s decision is directly related to his own risk exposure:


Within a heavy propaganda report from the New York Times there are also details about the Intelligence Community Inspector General that show the tell-tale fingerprints of the ICIG supportive intent (emphasis mine):

[…] Mr. Atkinson, a Trump appointee, nevertheless concluded that the allegations appeared to be credible and identified two layers of concern.

The first involved a possible violation of criminal law. Mr. Trump’s comments to Mr. Zelensky “could be viewed as soliciting a foreign campaign contribution in violation of the campaign-finance laws,Mr. Atkinson wrote, according to the Justice Department memo. (read more)

Does the “foreign campaign contribution” angle sound familiar?  It should, because that argument was used in the narrative around the Trump Tower meeting with the Russian Lobbyist Natalia Veselnitskaya.  More specifically, just like FARA violations the overused “campaign contribution” narrative belongs to a specific network of characters, Lawfare.

The “Schiff Dossier”, aka “whistle-blower” complaint was a constructed effort of allied members within congress and the intelligence apparatus to renew the impeachment effort.  The intelligence team, including the ICIG, changed the whistleblower form to allow the CIA to insert the Schiff Dossier, written by Lawfare.

The Soft-Coup effort continues…

This entry was posted in 4th Amendment, 6th Amendment, Abusive Cops, AG Bill Barr, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, CIA, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Election 2020, FBI, IG Report Comey, IG Report FISA Abuse, IG Report McCabe, Impeachment, Legislation, media bias, Nancy Pelosi, President Trump, propaganda, Russia, Spygate, Spying, Typical Prog Behavior, Ukraine, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

738 Responses to ICIG Whistleblower Form Recently Modified to Permit Complaint “Heard From Others”…

  1. Louisiana Tea Rose says:


    Everybody in DC and beyond knows about the Biden gig. That’s why the outrage machine is firing blanks on that issue. What we AREN’T HEARING IS AIRING OUT CROWDSTRIKE.


    Guess who WAS talking about it all afternoon on his radio show yesterday? Hannity. In exquisite detail. It was quite a narrative, and very thorough.

    I keep seeing through our threads that R’s like Jordan, Meadows, et al are not helping, not supporting the President, whining like crybabies to Maria on Sunday AM, that Barr/Durham and Co. aren’t doing their jobs, that Trump alone should blow the whole thing up. We don’t know how you do it, Mr. President, but just DO. IT. NOW.

    That little phone convo the Left is disintegrating under should have been very instructive to us, too, but apparently the message they heard loud and clear is lost on too many of the rest of us. Everything they have been doing BT (before Trump) AND AT (after Trump) is being reverse engineered right in front of the entire country. Actually, the entire global community. Anyone who doesn’t see that convo as the ultimate trolling maneuver seriously understimates the genius that is Trump.

    That “envoy” to Ukraine, State Department resignation weren’t just coinkydink. Why do you think Pompeo is getting more subpoenas in his mailbox than I got trash mail from Publishers Clearing House since I was legal to vote? Forget it. I ain’t tellin’ ya’ll how old I am….nunya!

    There’s something else being ignored here: Durham has been all over Europe. And Barr didn’t go to Italy to buy a pizza. But listening to some voices here you’d think they hooked up with Obama and went for a cruise on George Cloony’s party barge.

    I would NEVER claim to know everything that’s going on behind the scene played out for us. What I AM saying is that YOU DON’T EITHER, my friends.

    The stuff we don’t know…IS A LOT. What I do know is I have eyes, ears, a brain, discernment, Sundance, and President Donald J. Trump.

    I would say the odds are in our favor.

    Liked by 7 people

    • swimeasy says:

      Well said LTR! We stay the POTUS support course! Ready yourselves to contact your reps at the key time. Respond en masse in Nov 2020 giving POTUS a mandate and sending a clear message!

      Liked by 1 person

      • SwampRatTerrier says:

        Eric Trump


        UPDATE: We have now raised almost $15 million in small dollar donations (including 50,000 NEW donors) since @SpeakerPelosi started this impeachment charade 72 hrs ago!

        Liked by 1 person

    • Louisiana Tea Rose says:

      I left out: I have Ristvan, Gunny, EagleDriver, and the multitudes of patriots who come here to laugh, cry, bitch, learn, and praise Jesus, thank or Lord for our country and each other.

      Liked by 5 people

      • SwampRatTerrier says:

        PREACH IT!!!!!!!!!!!

        We need more post like yours above.

        As another Treeper posted today, the DEEP STATE TROLLS have been legion today sowing despair.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Contrarymary says:

        And the irony is the jstreet/lawfare group along with congress are taking two weeks off for Rosh Hashanah/Yom Kippur, day of repentance and day of atonement. What do you wanna make a bet they’re not atoning or repenting of their evil hearts.


    • snarkybeach says:

      Jordan & Meadows are neutered thanks to Nancy’s rule changes. We DO have senators supposedly in charge of committees that are “Waaaa Waaaaing What can we do” that have subpoena powers…

      Liked by 1 person

    • Artful Zombie says:

      Why all the hysteria regarding a change by SOMEONE to the ‘whistleblower’ complaint form?
      If it was secretly changed to allow hearsay, what is the big deal to un-secretly change it back?
      Who is in charge of that department?
      If they won’t make the correction, termination!


  2. Another Ian says:


    The Bongino video (1076 IIRC) did a nice job of showing that Shiff had it before it was formally filed… Shiff references things in the complaint in a tweet prior to the complaint being filed…


    Liked by 1 person

  3. Joemama says:

    So the obvious question then is: what is to stop patriots from copying one or two Sundance articles an submitting them as proof of sedition by deep state in a “Disclosure of Urgent Concern Form”?

    Liked by 1 person

    • sedge2z says:

      Somebody over at The_Donald on reddit copied the new Whistle Blower Complaint Form. They checked the new box saying they heard it from someone else.
      In the space to explain their source, they wrote “SETH RICH”

      Liked by 3 people

    • sedge2z says:

      Instructions on the WB info says your disclosure must involve Classified Information, but not about differences of opinions, and “please identify the agency wrongdoing”.
      Then you are faced with who-knows lawyer warnings by numbers/letters like “Section 2302 (a)(2)(A) of Title 5” and “threat prohibited under subsection (g)(3)(B)”…….
      But here’s their HotLine number in case you want to Ask Them any Questions:
      ICIG Hotline 855-731-3260 (Intelligence Community Inspector General)


  4. swamph8er says:

    What the form says doesn’t mean crap. What the Intel IG regulation says about what constitutes a whistleblower is what matters.


  5. Elle says:

    After listening to radio on while driving on Thurs and Friday that it seemed curious the way everyone was referring to the whistle blower and it crossed my mind that maybe they were hoping for Rudy or someone to generate a Valerie Plame redux.


  6. jus wundrin says:

    I was looking for the older form prior to the Aug 2019 revision. Its great that you posted it SD, BUT the form does not have the prior revision stamp date on it. Not to pour cold water, but is there any way that the prior whistle blower doc is genuine? Does the wayback machine verify the authenticity?


    • Lester Smith says:

      Who changed and who approved and singed off these changes. A paper trail of some of the conspirators made these changes Barr you got a road map to start with.


    • Bobsaget says:

      Maybe I’m missing something, but when reading the forms on the Wayback Machine, none of them say anything about information needing to be first hand. I thought that was changed in the current form? I don’t see it mentioned in any of the forms, current or past.
      The Wayback Machine forms are all 3 pages for me. Help me figure out what I’m missing, please.


  7. WVNed says:

    Start filing complaints on democrats. Thousands of them. Millions of them.


  8. theherofails says:

    When are people going to wake up and realize that this is a revolution against us, the average American? We can either react or go down like every other group that’s lost a revolution.. Where is that warrior spirit?


    • JMHH says:

      You are ABSOLUTELY correct! These insidious radical Leftist quislings have declared war on We The People, the laws and rights of our Constitution and on the nation as a whole.

      The sooner that Americans accept that reality, the sooner we can stand up, join ranks, fight back, hit them hard and keep hitting them hard until until we beat them for good.


  9. Judy says:


    1) Falsely accuse target of . . . Something
    2) Falsely accuse target of obstruction or coverup, when target mounts a defense
    3) Rinse & repeat
    See? Simple !!


  10. ChampagneReady says:

    Graham, who are you subpoena–ing? All you do is go on talk shows and spout Never Never Land blather.

    You’re a joke. You’re head of virtually the most powerful committee in Congress and you are letting this puke-worthy farce go on without nary a subpoena to nobody. You should be demanding the whistleblower come before your commitee. And it shouldn’t matter that you are in recess or no recess.

    You should call a special session to do it ! You wuss Republicans make me sick.

    Liked by 1 person

  11. wtd says:

    Sundance wrote:

    “The CIA whistleblower complaint is likely the VERY FIRST complaint allowed using the new IGIC protocol and standard. Taken in combination with the timeline of the August 12th notification letter to Schiff and Burr and the Schiff tweet of August 28th, there’s little room for doubt this Ukraine whistleblower impeachment effort was pre-planned.

    Brennan Calls on Unlimited Number of Deep State Spies to Use New, Secretly Altered Whistleblower Complaint Form to ‘Report Trump’ @CristinaLaila1 https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/09/brennan-calls-on-unlimited-number-of-deep-state-spies-to-use-new-secretly-altered-whistleblower-complaint-form-to-report-trump/ … via @gatewaypundit

    Sundance wrote:

    “President Trump announced Joseph Macguire as the Acting ODNI on August 8th, 2019. (link) The CIA operative “whistle-blower” letter to Adam Schiff and Richard Burr was on August 12th (link). Immediately following this letter, the ICIG rules and requirements for “whistle-blowers” was modified, allowing hearsay complaints. On August 28th Adam Schiff begins tweeting about the construct of the complaint.”

    Only a few hours after taking office as Acting DNI in Aug 2019, Maguire was ambushed with the “whistleblower” complaint

    Only a few hours after taking office as DNI in Mar 2017, Dan Coats was ambushed with a “briefing” on the Russia Collusion probe by then FBI Director Comey

    Liked by 1 person

    • sedge2z says:

      If Deep State obeys John Brennar and files Whistle Blower (New) Complaint Forms, then would they have protection status from their own wrong-doings?
      John Brennar, why don’t YOU fill out a WB Form & show us how this new form works?


    • sedge2z says:

      I enjoy this UnderCoverHuber site, but it’s not REALLY John W. Huber…..Just so ya know.


    • Big John lives in a glass house. You’d think he would stop standing in front if the window in the living room without any clothes on. It’s just grossing everybody out, because everyone knows it’s him. And, man, he’s ugly EVERYWHERE, not just the mug…


      Liked by 1 person

    • Big John lives in a glass house. You’d think he would stop standing in front if the window in the living room without any clothes on. It’s just grossing everybody out, because everyone knows it’s him. And, man, he’s ugly EVERYWHERE, not just the mug…


      Liked by 1 person

  12. wtd says:


  13. SAM-TruthFreedomLiberty says:

    Liked by 1 person

  14. Ross Newland says:

    Something seems strange about the new complaint form, as opposed to the older “personal knowledge only” form.

    I downloaded the new form (hearsay allowed), and then two earlier older files available from archive.org (thank you Sundance for the link).

    Clicking on File/Document Properties of those pdfs, the following can be seen:

    1. The earliest downloaded form was created 9-11-18, and has fillable form fields; the security settings indicate that text changes etc. are allowed in the document. The author name says “Mitchell A. Ly-DNI-Y”; and the “Custom” information says: “Company: U.S. Government, SourceModified”. Additional “Custom” information indicates that form may actually have been first created on 5-17-18.

    2. The next form created shortly thereafter 11-9-18, appears to be exactly like the one above; however; the security settings do not allow changes. The author and “Custom” information is the same as above. Apparently someone realized it might be smart to have some security on this document.

    3. The new form from Aug/Sept 2019 (allowing designation of “heard from others”) is somewhat different. It says created 9-25-19. There are no fillable form fields, only straight text. This document has zero security settings – any of the text in the document can be easily edited or altered (including the Revised date at the bottom right corner). There is no document author name given; and at “Custom” information, it no longer says “U.S. Government”, but only “Company: SourceModified”.

    At the least it seems very strange that a purported government document that can lead to legal action and in this case possible impeachment proceedings of the POTUS, would not have more security settings. I tried changing the text and it was very easy to do.

    Another question is, why does the document say “Rev. August 2019”, when the date in the document properties says it was created 9-25-2019?

    And why does the new document no longer show U.S. Government as the “Company”? Does anyone know what “SourceModified” means?

    More questions than answers, it seems. Anyone with more thoughts and/or knowledge of pdf document attributes and security, please weigh in…


    • Bromdale says:

      As a follow-up to this very useful information: has Acting DNI Joseph Maguire issued a directive that the earlier version of the form be reinstated? If not, will he do so? it would be interesting to know.


  15. islandpalmtrees says:

    Pelosi’s Impeachment Bluff Hides Real Ukraine Story; CrowdStrike, Soros & Hillary Servers In Kiev
    The Duran Quick Take: Episode 315.

    The Duran’s Alex Christoforou and Editor-in-Chief Alexander Mercouris discuss the release of a transcript between U.S. President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, which was the basis of a Democrat push for an impeachment inquiry and which does not reveal any type of ‘quid pro quo’ or other attempt to pressure Ukraine into investigating former Obama VP Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden


  16. This article needs to be posted on President Trump’s Twitter account.
    It is unbelievable that the the Democrats would go this far. Completely illegal and dishonest. Unfortunately the Left leading media will not report any of this until the Public sees this as a Tweet from President Trump.


  17. meadowlarkspring says:

    In my opinion, there are way too many lawyers in government service that think that the president we elected should answer to them. That’s how I view the change in the urgent concern form.

    The change in the urgent form means a would be whistleblower no longer needs the media to leak. They can just chat with Congress. Congress can leak.

    I think many intelligence people (lawyers by training) do not like the fact that President Trump did not release his tax returns, but they have to share theirs to get approved by Congress.

    There’s a huge difference politically between getting elected and getting approved or simply working for the government. It seems like they can’t cope being under an elected executive decision maker.

    Here’s Mr. Atkinson’s answers to the Senate Intelligence questionnaire. I’d be curious what questionnaire Inspector Generals have to fill out for the White House.



  18. Katherine McCoun says:

    I am confused on this issue based on this info:


  19. from Gateway Pundit

    BREAKING: Adam Schiff sent a House Intel staffer to Ukraine during Aug 24-31 just 12 days after receiving the whistleblower complaint. This is the same week Schiff posted his Ukraine military aid tweet – Aug 28

    This trip was sponsored by a think tank that receives funding from a program of left-wing billionaire George Soros’ Open Society Foundation called “Open Society Initiative for Europe”
    Here is Adam Schiff’s signature authorizing the travel, dated July 22

    They met directly with former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, who lost to current president Volodymyr Zelensky in a landslide 73-25 victory.

    Poroshenko was known for his strong ties to the Obama Administration, specifically Obama’s point man for Ukraine:


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s