Senator Elizabeth Warren Promises to Rebuild Russian Economy, Grow China’s Influence and Support Maduro Regime in Venezuela…

Democrat president candidate Elizabeth Warren has made a campaign promise that is quite remarkable:

The consequences of such policy are not esoteric; they are very real and very serious.  Who would immediately benefit from Warren’s policy: Russia, China, Iran and Venezuela. Who would suffer, Americans.  Here’s how…

Within the first 24 hours of Elizabeth Warren’s presidency she is promising to dramatically raise the price of Oil and Natural Gas.  This will:

  • Immediately hand Vladimir Putin hundreds of billions worth of enhanced Russian energy exports.  A windfall of economic growth that will mean Russian policy expansion globally.
  • Support the regime of Venezuelan dictator Maduro who relies on oil production and pricing to keep his socialist government in place.
  • Expand the influence of China; and increase the value of Beijing’s investments in Russian energy and 49% state in PDVSA (Venezuela).
  • Immediately help the Iranian economy; enhance the stranglehold of power by the Mullah’s over the Iranian people; help fund terrorist actions globally, and specifically create terrorist attacks in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Libya and Israel.
  • Return U.S. policy and strategy back to a position of dependence on OPEC nations; so we can expect more U.S. military involvement in the middle-east (as above).

  • Destroy growth in American wages , and set up energy policy that will drive further industrial manufacturing out of the U.S. and into Mexico and Asia.
  • Simultaneously drive up the price of electricity in the U.S, further exacerbating the financial costs and losses to the U.S. middle-class.
  • Raise gas prices back to Obama-era rates $5/gal.
  • In turn this will drive up the cost of transported products, and U.S. food prices will jump approximately 20% as massive inflation hits highly-consumable categories first.
  • The collective impact of the four domestic points above will drive down the ability of consumers to spend on other goods.  The U.S. economy is two-thirds dependent on consumer spending…. The collective impact means economic contraction.

Candidate Elizabeth Warren is promising to deliver these results in the first 24 hours of her administration if she was to win the presidency.

Senator Elizabeth Warren has never worked in the private sector; nor has she created anything that is materially not connected to government expansion.  She is proposing policy without any comprehension of downstream impact on a domestic, international, geopolitical or national security basis.

Senator Warren promises these impacts in her first 24 hours in office.

Think very carefully about it….

This entry was posted in Auto Sector, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Decepticons, Dem Hypocrisy, Donald Trump, Economy, energy, Glo-Bull Warming, Iran, media bias, Occupy Type Moonbats, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Trade Deal, Uncategorized, US Treasury, USA. Bookmark the permalink.

173 Responses to Senator Elizabeth Warren Promises to Rebuild Russian Economy, Grow China’s Influence and Support Maduro Regime in Venezuela…

  1. whodoneit says:

    Her first day as what? Hahahahahahahah!

    Liked by 7 people

    • Rhi says:

      She couldn’t be anymore explicit in her intent to to crash the economy and destroy this country. This is the Democrat party- enemy of the Republic.

      Obamanation almost completed the fundamental transformation of the country, the demoncrats are now all in. Choose ye this day ……..

      Liked by 8 people

  2. Kaco says:

    “Senator Elizabeth Warren Promises to Rebuild Russian Economy, Grow China’s Influence and Support Maduro Regime in Venezuela…”

    This needs to be memed on a daily basis.

    Liked by 11 people

  3. beaujest says:

    Stinking Communist!

    Liked by 5 people

  4. TwoLaine says:

    IF the market is tanking and companies are not spending, perhaps this is why.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. John Good says:

    With the exception of Margret Thatcher, WHAT Woman Leader of ANY prosperous country in the World has benefited said country?

    That picture above of Clinton & Warren “scares the Hell out of me”! These are two corrupt vindictive women who you just know will be bad for the Free World. And I think that they both hate men!

    About 5 yrs. ago, I showed a photo of the female leaders of about 6 or so European Countries to an acquaintance of mine & asked “Do you really think that these women can run a Country’?

    Ian was offended, because he is a Liberal Loon here in Canada!

    Vote like your Country depends on you, because Donald J Trump saved you from Hillary & now you must return the favor!

    Besides, I know what he is doing will affect the Whole World for the better, & might even affect Canada, if we can get rid of the Socialist Twits running the Country.

    Liked by 6 people

  6. Margaret Berger says:

    I know a lot of women my age (very late sixties) who are educated, well off and and have always voted democratic and always will. It will not matter how impractical or destructive the Democratic Party policies are they will vote democratic. It doesn’t matter who that party runs or what that individual says they will vote democratic. They don’t read policy, they can’t name all of the green house gases and haven’t a clue about our trade issues. They don’t understand that electric cars run on coal in this country and that windmills kill birds. They will vote democratic because it is part of their identity. It is who they are. Unlike those who vote republican they will even vote democratic when they die.

    Liked by 6 people

    • Raptors2020 says:

      Single women vote Democrat.
      Married women become Republican.
      Most telling, divorced and widowed women return to voting Democrat (they’re now married to the government).

      Liked by 5 people

      • graphiclucidity says:

        There’s a lot of truth in what you say about some women replacing men (fathers, husbands, boyfriends, brothers) with government (police, welfare, education, subsidies, enforced child support).

        They won’t see it that way, but that’s effectively what’s happened and that’s why they vote for Democrats to run the state which they now see as protector and provider.

        Liked by 3 people

    • American Heritage says:

      I blame “conventional wisdom” for most people who vote democrat/socialist. By exposure to the constant drumbeat of MSM propaganda, they think it’s factual and they are, therefore “informed.” The only other explanation, for anyone not already constrained by totalitarian rule, to vote himself into Democrat corruption and socialist slavery is blind, stupid ignorance and perpetual intellectual adolescence.

      Liked by 1 person

    • American Heritage says:

      One small quibble: There is nothing “democratic” about Democrats. It seems overly gracious to refer to them or anything having to do with them as “democratic.”

      Liked by 1 person

    • RJ says:

      The wonders of a “country club lifestyle” are so special and never disappoint!
      Then again singer Travis Tritt had his perspective, so I guess both views stand the test of time.


  7. Watch her poll numbers; she’s gaining. The only chance of her getting knocked out of the box is if Romney and Lee switch parties (OFFICIALLY) and run as a tag team – Pres and VP.


  8. trialbytruth says:

    I think Warren just said “Hey Russia if your listening how about sending me a billion dollars so I can take a swing at Trump.”

    Russia and China are going to be going deep in debt to finance the 2020 election . I hope we are ready.

    Liked by 3 people

  9. graphiclucidity says:

    I thought the same as you when I first read that tweet, SD.

    My thoughts went to trying to guess at how much the price of a barrel of oil would jump if she was ever elected.

    I’d say the price would be up to around $150 – $200 a barrel ($5+/gal. gasoline) by the time Warren was inaugurated to take the reins of an economy in total free-fall.

    The Church of Climate Cult Madness demands sacrifice.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. Jack Russell says:

    Politicians have a long record of making promises, and threats, that they have no intention of carrying out. They may not be real bright, but they aren’t complete idiots. All any of the democrat contenders are doing is appealing to the segment of American voters who are too young, too dumb and too gullible to see through their BS. That’s approximately 1/4 to 1/3 of the voting public. They’re hoping that dirty tricks and voter fraud will get them the rest of the votes need. And if they win and don’t carry through on any part of their campaign promises, they’ll blame the GOP and that 1/4 to 1/3 of the electorate will believe them!

    Liked by 2 people

  11. Herve Simon says:

    I love Margaret Berger.

    Liked by 1 person

  12. Just add Bernie’s poll #s to Warren’s if you want to see where she will sit after the winnowing. The key question is, how will she pivot to the center after the primary? “I’m not Orange” is an effective msg for some in the center, but she will have to do something FOR the middle class. Trump has done an outstanding job pushing the Dems so far to the far left they are now the enemy of the people (where have we heard that before). Many old school Dems I know can’t articulate how she will pivot, and have given up.


    • In the Land of Poz says:

      She had reasonable middle-class oriented ideas in her books and academic work, but her ability to point to that erodes with every bizarre leftism she espouses on the way to the nomination. Slavery reparations! Healthcare for illegals! The Democratic debates are the gift that keeps on giving.


      • 1stgoblyn says:

        And I heard her talk one time when she mentioned reparations for slavery, reparations for LGBT+ but haven’t heard her mention it since. Just pandering to her audience prolly.


  13. In the Land of Poz says:

    Great news. Should Warren become the nominee, this will tank her support in some key states whose economies depend on fracking. And if it helps prevent her from being nominated, so much the better.

    I think she would present the most serious challenge to Trump of the current candidates. The DNC slave media can cover for her in ways that will not work for Biden, Sanders or Harris, so her natural strategy (if nominated) would be rather Obama-like. Avoid specifics, rely on the Woke Capital/globalist fundraising machine, and when forced to debate, distract from POTUS’ far superior skills by presenting herself as the Nice Midwestern Lady alternative to the evil Drumpf.


  14. jim says:

    49% stake.


  15. Michael Jones says:

    The Poster Child for “You Can’t Fix Stupid”.

    Liked by 1 person

  16. As is typical, these so-called “candidates” are navigating by weathervane … and behaving as though nothing at all – let alone something utterly revolutionary and now irreversible – happened in November 2016. And they expect people to vote for any of these fools … for any of them.


  17. Sam Dennis says:

    If Trump made those ridiculous campaign promises the Democrats would be screaming and offer that as evidence of his being an Authoritarian dictator.

    Luckily for America the only way she gets to the Oval Office is by taking the WH ‘public’ tour.


  18. Doug Amos says:

    Grey Beaver never lets a little thing like the truth bother her.


  19. hillbilly4 says:

    One word for her: magpie.


  20. motheroftwo says:



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s