In an effort to prove how enlightened, cosmopolitan and multicultural they are as a progressive society – Canada has been accepting thousands of refugees from the Middle East. 
In honor of their superiority, today the upper-cloistered team gathered to celebrate a new era.  A modern era of North American rulers who decree their own enlightenment.

The Three Amigos Congratulate Each Other on Their Elite Magnanimity.

https://vine.co/v/5zAMWAjdh5z

However,…

Faith Goldy of TheRebel.media began to hear reports of migrant children in various Canadian relocation areas who were abusing and bullying other students. So she set up a tip line ([email protected]) for parents to share what was going on.
Using that tip line, a New Brunswick parent told Faith Goldy there were migrant “children” at her child’s High School as old as 22.  These adult males “with full beards” are “hitting on the 14-15 year old girls.”
TheRebel.media then filed a Freedom of Information request to get to the bottom of the claim.  Over 2,700 documents came in, and more are on the way.  Emails between teachers reveal what’s going on in their classrooms, and what they say will shock you. (more…)

When you think about “Trade Deals” – even the phrase elicits a myriad of opinions that causes the intellectual class to immediately drag the conversation into the esoteric weeds.
So allow me to give you an example of modern trade discussion using something many will be familiar with: Fig Newtons.  Specifically, Nabisco brand Fig Newtons.
How do you make a Fig Newton? Who is involved in the process of making a Fig Newton? And how does that chewy snack reach your market?  Understand that process and you understand the fundamental flaw in 2016 Trade deals.  Fig Newtons also highlight how to destroy the middle class.
There are three general aspects, and three groups responsible, to making a Fig Newton available to you.  The supply chain is known as “field to fork”, but any manufactured product can be viewed in the same three general ways:

• The Farmer – (no collar) who produces the raw material
• The Processor – (blue collar) who turns the raw material into a packaged good
• The Consumer  – (white collar) the company (Nabisco) sells the finished good to a retailer (Market) who in turn sell the product to you, the consumer.

So let’s give the Fig Newton supply chain a face: (more…)

Whether you have historically found yourself aligning with the traditional political left (Democrats) or the traditional political right (Republicans), it really matters not.  In the next several months we are about to see some very uncomfortable truths.
To our friends from the “Conservative Right”, we simply share a message: if we thought candidate Donald Trump had already revealed many usurping agents within our collective ranks, we ain’t seen nothing yet.
Example:

If we’re willing to bear witness, we are about to see just how deep, entrenched and controlling the Globalist/Wall Street financial tentacles are within the party apparatus.
We shall also witness the professional punditry, specific websites, particular radio voices, voluminous writers, historic authors, etc. who gain financial benefit from supporting these same usurping agents.
(more…)

Trey Gowdy begins press conference on new Benghazi report June 28 2016.
House Select Committee on Benghazi Report Members held a news conference today to release their report on the September 2012 attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, in which four Americans died including Ambassador Christopher Stevens.

Links To the Benghazi Full Committee Report AVAILABLE HERE
Link To USA Today Op-Ed by Committee Members Mike Pompeo and Jim Jordan – HERE
*Quick Sundance Note* – I’m not finished reading the 800 pages of the report, but you can be guaranteed I will.  However, notice how every single member of the White House, State Department, CIA  and now the Select Committee continue to say there were no assets deployed because no assets were strategically located “close enough” to be of assistance.
Now consider: (more…)

In March of 2012 there was a clear inflection point within the judicial system when leftists, professional grievance activists, switched tactics from proclaiming the innocence of the transparently guilty, to advocating for the guilt of the transparently innocent.
The political case constructs against George Zimmerman and Darren Wilson were two high-profile examples that soon followed…. now this:
This past weekend the Baltimore Sun outlined investigative evidence from a Baltimore detective, Dawnyell Taylor, that clearly shows the prosecution of the Baltimore Six police officers was yet another example.  Baltimore prosecutor Marilyn Mosby manufactured a political case intended to advocate for the guilt of the transparently innocent.
(Via Baltimore Sun) The lead Baltimore police detective in the Freddie Gray investigation said she reluctantly read to grand jurors a summary of evidence provided by prosecutors that she believed was misleading, according to police records reviewed by The Baltimore Sun. (more…)

WASHINGTON (AP) — An additional 165 pages of emails from Hillary Clinton’s time at the State Department surfaced Monday, including nearly three dozen that the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee failed to hand over last year that were sent through her private server.
[scribd id=316896963 key=key-GSEklVmWsVItRXVQVLmW mode=scroll]
(more…)

After the Orlando terrorist attack Hillary Clinton went into a modified sub surface communication status called “radio infrequent”.  Tenuous times require those who communicate via poll-tested and political wind-driven soundbites to move carefully amid unfamiliar terrain.
Now, as predicted, after the “anti-globalist” Brexit result, Hillary Clinton goes further into the status of “radio-silent”.   Full Stop (stay quiet, stay deep), and stay away from visibility until the consultants can gauge the best course.  Status = Deep Sweat, Anxious.

The professional media political class, who are still trying to come to grips with the ramifications of a stunning geopolitical push back, are also in a reassessment mode.  The polling releases today from Washington Post/ABC and from Wall Street Journal/NBC also highlight their modified deep-pause position.
(more…)

(more…)

At the heart of the common sense information surrounding the Brexit vote a few ordinary and uncomfortable points continue to be avoided by the echo-chambered media elite who have retreated to their safe spaces:
♦ First Point – The U.K. was sending Brussels $500 million per week of their wealth to be redistributed to the ‘lesser than’ affiliates.  In essence, Classic Fabian/Socialist Economics: From each according to their ability – to each according to their need.
Simultaneously, to the parasitic withdrawal – inbound immigration was putting unsustainable financial strain on the social/societal welfare systems of the host.
♦ Second Point – Inbound, seemingly uncontrolled, mass immigration to the U.K. was twice the level of job creation in the same time period.  That reality is unsustainable by any concept of societal economics.  Obviously the displaced and impacted workers were/are the residents of the host country. (more…)

A few days ago Bloomberg published a poll of 2,001 registered voters containing a sub-set of 945 voters considered “investors” in the financial markets (full pdf below).
From those voters who are also financial investors the results showed a 50% favorability for Donald Trump, and a 33% favorability for Hillary Clinton.  Not only do voters trust Trump more with their personal and family safety, they also trust Donald Trump more with their personal and family finances:

(Bloomberg)  More voters with a stake in the stock market say Donald Trump would be better as president for their portfolios than Hillary Clinton, with about one in four saying they’ll alter their asset mix if the Republican is elected and a similar share saying they’d do so if the Democrat wins.
A Bloomberg/Morning Consult national poll on investment, tax and economic issues shows voters with money in the market pick Trump over Clinton, 50 percent to 33 percent, as the person they think will be better for their portfolio. Those with more than $50,000 invested answer the question almost identically as smaller investors.
(more…)