Multiple motions filed by the State of Florida last week are coming to light today. One of the more interesting motions is the “State Motion Regarding The Calling Of A Witness“.
In essence BDLR is filing a motion, in advance of the case even starting, asking the judge to deliver an order, to stop the defense from using the absence of witness testimony to show the weakness in the State’s case.
The motion itself is predictive in nature – meaning the State is predicting the Defense will use a non-called witness against them. Which begs the following question:
What witnesses are optically so valuable to the State’s case that their absence would prejudice a jury? (more…)










