HatTip N.A.

Sorry for the poor audio quality… but  I think you can understand what she says.

This is humor… well, kinda

File this study in the same cabinet as “water being wet” and “forks in your eyes are painful”…… We certainly did not need a progressive university computer identification program to figure this one out…… and the inside is even worse.

(HuffingtonPost via Weasel Zippers) Republican congresswomen appear more “feminine” than their Democrat counterparts, according to a new study by UCLA psychology researchers.

“Female politicians with stereotypically feminine facial features are more likely to be Republican than Democrat, and the correlation increases the more conservative the lawmaker’s voting record,” said study author Colleen M. Carpinella, a UCLA graduate student in psychology, in an article posted to the UCLA Newsroom website.

So what makes a woman “stereotypically feminine?” (more…)

Instant classic and numerous editions to the best of Miller series.   If you missed it, you really should watch.   Highly enjoyable.   The Sandra Fluke parts are hilarious…. brilliant.

If you remember the Moonbatty Howard Dean “scream” campaign speech;  and if you saw the Moonbatty Jennifer Granholm speech last night during the DNC convention and her, well, bizarro behavior…….  you just knew someone was going to mash them together.

Below is the original speech from Granholm last night.  It is funnier than the mash up in my opinion. (more…)

You DO NOT need to be a body language expert to spot the protective “cover-up”. When you are in a hole, it’s generally best to stop digging. Blaming “others”, members of your own team, like Mayor Booker and Gov. Strickland, for the platform fiasco is only going to lead questioning folks to Booker and Strickland for a quote and response to for why they both choose to defy the administration policy.

(more…)

Only partially tongue in cheek.

Perhaps some of the outer circle Z’s, The Mesa’s, The Osterman’s and various other semi-associated outliers et al  should hold a giant BBQ over the Labor Day holiday weekend and gather together in fellowship.

After lunch they can circle the lawn chairs, break out legal pads and collectively decide who is going to be allowed to “cash in”.    Through the rules process of closed collective bargaining once the “who” is determined they can then draw up a collaborative annual schedule, and timeline, for “cashing-in” activities.

Perhaps Mark O’Mara could be invited to moderate the discussion (I would recommend maybe bring a couple of bouncers) then, after determinations of agreement, he can facilitate and write up the contractual agreements about who can do what, when and for how much.

No need to invite George, he is irrelevent to the process.

(oh, but reminder – the crew would need George to pay O’Mara for his time and trough construction, so keep track of the time and submit the bill for payment…. k? )