A massive amount of division lays at the heart of many George Zimmerman supporters regarding his legal counsel Mark O’Mara. In an effort to heal the infection – here is why it matters, and what it infers moving forward.
Personally, I am not a fan of Mark O’Mara – simply because I do not trust, nor am I willing to excuse, those who have shown a history of untrustworthy behavior. However, I will try to disassociate myself from opinion and reflect upon the integrity issues within, because, quite frankly, George has NO option(s) – For better or worse, he’s stuck with him.
History – Mark O’Mara ideologically, like his friend and CNN contributor Mark NaJame, is more in alignment with the people who are prosecuting George Zimmerman than the people who support him. Mark O’Mara’s central outlook toward life is “progressive”, and he infers that sentiment into his approach. This ideology and familiarity is why Mark NaJame’s firm recommended O’Mara.
In short, he’s a legally left-leaning Democrat; and his views on gun ownership, stand-your-ground laws and trial lawyers, are counterintuitive to the position of the client he represents.
Most professionals would argue that attorneys are capable of separating their individual biases when advocating for clients positions. This is generally true; However in the case of Mark O’Mara he has specifically framed George Zimmerman’s positions on the case as if he is distancing himself from his client. Intellectually honest persons would agree with this overall impression that O’Mara exudes. (more…)