What is proposed below is regulatory, lawful and entirely intended to create hardships and burdens. Thus, a new era in State Department visa requirements respond to newly established guidelines by the Supreme Court.
As a pragmatic and patriotic American I respectfully suggest and recommend the U.S. State Department immediately institute the “Roberts Requirement” following similar visa entry protocols previously used for COVID-19 tests prior to U.S. admittance.
The Roberts Requirement: Each female visa applicant must present a valid negative pregnancy test taken no longer than 10 days prior to travel to the United States.
The certified document, negative pregnancy test, together with all related visa approvals must be presented to Customs and Border Patrol at each port of entry. Failure disqualifies the traveler.
This is the same protocol as COVID-19, only using pregnancy status as the disqualifying health issue. It is a lawful regulation, born from a new standard established by the Supreme Court, that does not need congressional approval.
Don’t get stuck on details about why it will not work, it will.
Start thinking like a person who realizes the goal is to create severe antagonism through regulation. That antagonism can then be directed.
Aim isolation, ridicule and marginalization at those who created the problem. This can be done without visible vitriol.
The objective is not just making sure pregnant women do not get visas; that is one small element. The bigger objective is to make it extremely difficult to come to the USA and THEN pin that global compliance requirement on Chief Justice John Roberts, making him live every day with the consequences of his blinded American stupidity; facing him, belittling him, ridiculing him, sitting on the front pages of his peers and global friends.
Chief Justice John Roberts created this mess, now put it on his doorstep every day.
But people will lie – doesn’t matter.
But people will create fake documents – doesn’t matter.
But people will still overstay their visas – doesn’t matter.
You are putting the emphasis on the wrong aspect.
Make every overburdensome visa rule and travel permit regulation specifically attributable to John Roberts decision. Pre-screenings, pregnancy tests, supplemental bond requirements for 15-to 45-year-old females, shortened visa terms and much more.
No exclusions for diplomats, sports figures, foreign actors, employees, H1Bs, student entry or any other visa type – the works. Make the total visa entry system subject to a regulatory and compliance nightmare at a scale that is unheard of. That is the scale of the problem Roberts has created. Now blame John Roberts for it.
This ‘Roberts Requirement’ applies to all visa types.
The objective, and it can accompany many other requirements such as a “bond” attachment required for 15- to 45-year-old females to travel, is to create such an overwhelmingly restrictive visa process that it creates ridicule on the SCOTUS decision.
Make every regulation specifically cited to the Supreme Court decision and make it exceptionally burdensome.
Make SCOTUS own the outcome.
Canadians and Mexicans also need to comply. The same rules apply to every nation and no longer are visas determined by timeline, but by the number of extensions required or allowed within it.
Every visa has a maximum duration of 3 months, with various extensions possible.
A one-year visa becomes a three-month visa with 4 extensions allowed. At each extension the same origination requirements must be fulfilled.
A two-year USA visa, is now a U.S. visa with 7 extensions allowed, etc.
Student visas carry the same requirement for 3-month extensions.
Require a – refundable at exit – surety bond purchase valued at $500,000 for any non-tourist visa. [Later the bond issuer, sell those non-refunded bonds and release the bounty hunters.]
No visas are exempt from the entry requirements.
This is a new era with new rules that specifically come as an outcome of new judicial rulings. This is not a White House or State Department issue. This is an issue created by the Supreme Court that needs an immediate response.
Congress can fix it, but in the interim – maximum regulatory pressure is applied directly to the wound.
♦ Example of point and counterpoints.
POINT: Canada, Mexico, India or [XXX] will scream this is unfair given the nature of our collaborative visa designations.
Counterpoint: Yes, you are correct. That was then; this is now. The nature of our visa system has changed because SCOTUS has just codified new distinctions on citizenship that now become new visa factors. Your nation does not convey birthright citizenship, so I understand your inability to accept our new terms. Unfortunately, our nation now does convey birthright citizenship, and as a consequence changes are needed.
Don’t back down. Make SCOTUS own it.
Sure, there will be legal challenges, all the way up to the same SCOTUS, and what are they going to do?
Think about it!
Make everyone live by the new rules – that are created by those who didn’t think about the consequences.
Brilliant. Rubio and State Department in charge plus Congress and courts have no jurisdiction
Note to all Treepers….
Send your note at this address
https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/
Dear Mr President- & SEC Rubio
The birthright decision is a disaster…
PLEASE IMPLEMENT THIS PLAN.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/30/the-roberts-requirement-pregnancy-tests-for-u-s-travel-visas/
Yes! We should repost on every social media and link to their accounts.
Scavino and Don Jr are more accessible.
I posted the link as a reply to President Trump on Truth Social
It’s a black day.
Black robed clowns with no respect for the citizenry aping bastardized (royal) English common law.
No longer SCOTUS its now a SCROTUM of Roberts legislators.
Supreme Court Revisionists That Under Mine America.
By any means necessary resist we much. Throw ideas for sand in the gears of the global nuts SD.
Overwhelm the DS with BS.
The Robert’s Rule will have to apply to both genders – or all genders.
Because Trannyism.
It should, no exceptions. After all, they have been screaming anyone can be a birthing person. Agree and hand them the compliance required to get their visa.
If Biden can open the floodgate President Trump can shut it. Imagine the blowback in about 1/2 second. CONgress would be in session ready to pass anything President Trump wanted to get him to open the country again.
Congress won’t do anything. Let’s be real. This article is nothing more than a feel good read after a dumb ruling.
SEC of State controls Visa policy. Executive function, not Congress.
The part that the Supreme Court now makes legal by this decree. The US citizen, the child, may be legally removed from parental custody upon the parents’ exit from the US. The child is a US citizen and subject to US laws and jurisdiction. The parents are not. If they chose to try to take a US citizen from the US, they must, as the parents, revoke the US citizenship.
Just because the child has US citizenship does not mean their parents get to stay.
Harsh. Very harsh. But it will stop the birthright citizenship stuff very quickly.
I like it but we know Republicans/RINOs can’t do harsh. People will say mean things about them and they’ll have to go cry in a corner.
Didn’t Obama kind of do this with the Coptic Christian’s fleeing the Muslim crazy states?
From what I remember they denied visas to these people even though they were getting slaughtered.
Damn Skippy!
Can we expect fake pregnancy statements bought from those who sell fake medical results; with no verifiable medical establishment, medical officers?
It is highly likely to expect there will be encounters of such fraudulent items, as the market for fake pregnancy results has expanded significantly beyond simple positive tests to include fake medical statements, ultrasounds, and DNA tests.
These deceptive products are readily available through online platforms, including Craigslist, eBay, and private Facebook groups, where sellers offer customized documents that mimic authentic medical records from non-existent or fraudulent establishments.
Availability: Listings for fake ultrasounds, prescription bottles, and fake bellies are common, often using coded language to evade platform policies.
Legality: While selling these items is generally legal, using them to procure funds (such as government aid or partner support) or to deceive employers, and now illegal immigration – constitutes fraud and can lead to criminal charges, including theft by deception or criminal impersonation.
Detection: Medical professionals can easily identify these forgeries through blood tests or clinical ultrasounds, which are far more reliable than home tests or fake documents.
Impact: The proliferation of these scams has caused adoption agencies and legal professionals to adopt stricter verification protocols, often requiring direct communication with licensed medical providers rather than accepting documents from individuals.
Several specific online platforms and marketplaces currently sell fake pregnancy statements, ultrasounds, and medical documents, often categorized as “novelty” or “prank” items to bypass regulations.
Dedicated Novelty Websites
Specialized e-commerce sites operate openly, offering fully customizable fake medical records. These platforms allow users to input specific patient names, dates, doctor names, and even hCG hormone levels to generate realistic-looking lab reports and sonograms.
Baby Maybe Shop: A prominent vendor selling customizable fake pregnancy documents, lab reports with specific hCG levels, and fake ultrasounds printed on real medical-grade thermal paper. They offer instant PDF downloads or physical prints.
FakeABaby.com: Sells fake sonograms and pregnancy verification letters that include authentication marks like hologram stickers and embossed seals to mimic official hospital documents.
General Marketplaces and Classifieds
Broader online marketplaces host individual sellers offering both manufactured fake tests and used positive tests from actual pregnant women. These listings often use coded language or are filed under “gag gifts” to avoid detection.
eBay and Craigslist: Historically and currently used to sell used positive pregnancy tests (real urine on sticks) and fake ultrasound images. Sellers often explicitly state they do not care how the item is used, ranging from pranks to more malicious deception.
Etsy: Hosts sellers offering digital templates for fake pregnancy verification letters, doctor confirmation notes, and lab result forms that buyers can edit and print themselves.
Facebook Groups & Gumtree: Private groups and local classifieds are used to arrange sales of used tests and fake documents, often facilitating local pickup to maintain anonymity.
Social Media and Content Creation Stores
With the rise of “prank” content, some vendors market these items specifically to content creators and influencers.
Instagram and TikTok Shops: Vendors often advertise through social media profiles, directing traffic to external sites where they sell “always positive” pregnancy tests and realistic fake ultrasound props designed for video production and social media stunts.
Also, since the left insists men can get pregnate, men should also be required to submit pregnacy test.
Yeah, good idea but I so not see anyone up in the swamp brave enough to make this happen. Besides, the compromised Roberts is just doing their bidding and I see Brett and acb are the other designated patsies to rule against the cases that could save the USA
I like it!
I understand the anger, but we don’t need to be silly.
“Each female visa applicant must present a valid negative pregnancy test taken no longer than 10 days prior to travel to the United States.”
Females over 50 are not going to be pregnant.
You apply for a US visa several weeks or months before you travel.
Citizens of many countries don’t need a visa to travel to the US. Also, there are 10-year and 5-year visas with multiple entries.
Hey if I had to provide a covid test, or papers or whatever BS! a two second pregnancy test is nothing.
Pee on the stick.
Excellent!!
NOW THIS is RIGHT ON!
I would also consider advancing the following Executive Order in order for it to make it’s way to SCOTUS which will reconcile Gorsuch’ domicile dissenting point. It shouldn’t matter if a foreign national is born in our country, whether to legal or illegal entrants, we should follow the process already set with constitutional remedies that cover how a child born to American parent abroad & apply the same standard. Why create a complicated system for others when other countries wouldn’t do the same?!
Brilliant Sundance! Absolutely brilliant!
And here we sit, waiting for our president to take action.
He’s run out the clock so to speak with Congress and the courts, and now I believe the emergency powers of the president must be engaged in order to save our country via secure elections.
Part of that process is to defend the next census, which means that the administration must significantly ramp up the rounding up of all illegal aliens and removing them from this country.
The Supreme Court‘s ruling has left us with no other choices. Yes, we can pass certain laws to prevent future illegal entry into the United States, but that does not stop those who are already here.
So the ball is in the presidents court. He’s told us all along what he would do but has yet to do. I’m past tired of waiting.
The procrastination has already significantly economically harmed, not only my family, but those are all Americans!