What is proposed below is regulatory, lawful and entirely intended to create hardships and burdens. Thus, a new era in State Department visa requirements respond to newly established guidelines by the Supreme Court.
As a pragmatic and patriotic American I respectfully suggest and recommend the U.S. State Department immediately institute the “Roberts Requirement” following similar visa entry protocols previously used for COVID-19 tests prior to U.S. admittance.
The Roberts Requirement: Each female visa applicant must present a valid negative pregnancy test taken no longer than 10 days prior to travel to the United States.
The certified document, negative pregnancy test, together with all related visa approvals must be presented to Customs and Border Patrol at each port of entry. Failure disqualifies the traveler.
This is the same protocol as COVID-19, only using pregnancy status as the disqualifying health issue. It is a lawful regulation, born from a new standard established by the Supreme Court, that does not need congressional approval.
Don’t get stuck on details about why it will not work, it will.
Start thinking like a person who realizes the goal is to create severe antagonism through regulation. That antagonism can then be directed.
Aim isolation, ridicule and marginalization at those who created the problem. This can be done without visible vitriol.
The objective is not just making sure pregnant women do not get visas; that is one small element. The bigger objective is to make it extremely difficult to come to the USA and THEN pin that global compliance requirement on Chief Justice John Roberts, making him live every day with the consequences of his blinded American stupidity; facing him, belittling him, ridiculing him, sitting on the front pages of his peers and global friends.
Chief Justice John Roberts created this mess, now put it on his doorstep every day.
But people will lie – doesn’t matter.
But people will create fake documents – doesn’t matter.
But people will still overstay their visas – doesn’t matter.
You are putting the emphasis on the wrong aspect.
Make every overburdensome visa rule and travel permit regulation specifically attributable to John Roberts decision. Pre-screenings, pregnancy tests, supplemental bond requirements for 15-to 45-year-old females, shortened visa terms and much more.
No exclusions for diplomats, sports figures, foreign actors, employees, H1Bs, student entry or any other visa type – the works. Make the total visa entry system subject to a regulatory and compliance nightmare at a scale that is unheard of. That is the scale of the problem Roberts has created. Now blame John Roberts for it.
This ‘Roberts Requirement’ applies to all visa types.
The objective, and it can accompany many other requirements such as a “bond” attachment required for 15- to 45-year-old females to travel, is to create such an overwhelmingly restrictive visa process that it creates ridicule on the SCOTUS decision.
Make every regulation specifically cited to the Supreme Court decision and make it exceptionally burdensome.
Make SCOTUS own the outcome.
Canadians and Mexicans also need to comply. The same rules apply to every nation and no longer are visas determined by timeline, but by the number of extensions required or allowed within it.
Every visa has a maximum duration of 3 months, with various extensions possible.
A one-year visa becomes a three-month visa with 4 extensions allowed. At each extension the same origination requirements must be fulfilled.
A two-year USA visa, is now a U.S. visa with 7 extensions allowed, etc.
Student visas carry the same requirement for 3-month extensions.
Require a – refundable at exit – surety bond purchase valued at $500,000 for any non-tourist visa. [Later the bond issuer, sell those non-refunded bonds and release the bounty hunters.]
No visas are exempt from the entry requirements.
This is a new era with new rules that specifically come as an outcome of new judicial rulings. This is not a White House or State Department issue. This is an issue created by the Supreme Court that needs an immediate response.
Congress can fix it, but in the interim – maximum regulatory pressure is applied directly to the wound.
♦ Example of point and counterpoints.
POINT: Canada, Mexico, India or [XXX] will scream this is unfair given the nature of our collaborative visa designations.
Counterpoint: Yes, you are correct. That was then; this is now. The nature of our visa system has changed because SCOTUS has just codified new distinctions on citizenship that now become new visa factors. Your nation does not convey birthright citizenship, so I understand your inability to accept our new terms. Unfortunately, our nation now does convey birthright citizenship, and as a consequence changes are needed.
Don’t back down. Make SCOTUS own it.
Sure, there will be legal challenges, all the way up to the same SCOTUS, and what are they going to do?
Think about it!
Make everyone live by the new rules – that are created by those who didn’t think about the consequences.
Sundance, do you have a way to get that proposal text to someone close to the President and/or Secretary Rubio who would actually read it? If so, would it help to collect Treepers’ electronic signatures for it (if that’s possible)? Something drastic must be done immediately if we are going to be able to save our country, and your proposal is totally within the President’s authority to implement and would make a great difference.
I’m pretty sure Tulsi Gabbard and Melania Trump both read the Treehouse. I’m sure there are others.
The Islamist will not comply… They will simply enter the US and disappear. I remember about three years ago I was watching an interview from the UK. One of the illegals said point blank into the camera that the UK is no longer a sovereign country. That they have finally out-populated them. Between them electing people to positions in OUR government and them building their own cities we are allowing them to take over our country.
again thats not the point here.. the point is to amplify the absurdity of the ruling by enforcing new mechanisms to deal with the new reality
AGree, but, Dino is pointing out other pertinent issues.
They have to comply or they do not get thru customs.
As soon as the ruling was publicly announced, my first thought was to “control” this free for all ruling, the US immigration should require a pregnancy test for ALL females (doesn’t matter if claim to be a man or trans or whatever a PT is required) 13 -45. requesting a temporary visa to the US and with limited extensions such as 1 or 2 extensions max, to thwart off the time period for the woman to give birth in the US.
Pregnancy test 12-50, safer age range.
Yes, but like he says include trans people. Also, artificial insemination can create viable fetuses in much older females – 66 was possible 20 years ago. Make it simple, everybody needs a pregnancy test – male or female or trans of any age. There have been pregnancies in girls as young as 5 or 6. Exceedingly rare but it has happened.
My thought too.
Given that U.S. citizenship has a high value, and in recognition of the technological advances in medicine, some people will do anything! to capture the prize.
Use your imagination, IVF of a minor, or worse, is not off the table.
Amend the suggested age range to 8 – 65.
Note, it matters not if the birth produces a viable baby.
There is no boundary of evil. If you are to make a law, you must consider the evil inentions of wicked, perverse people.
No age minimums or maximums, no sex (gender) exemptions. Everyone has to take the test, any tests, all tests, just like COVID. Use every method to make it tough!
No, it should be a negative test with *24 hours*. That was the requirement for re-entering the US during the COVID scare – I know, because I nearly was blocked from entering the country in 2022 because my COVID test had been taken 36 hours before I boarded the plane, rather than 24.
I like this even better. The hardships they placed on travelers. You would get to the border, had to find a healthcare provider that would test you, then you had to wait to obtain the negative documentation so that you could proceed. I didn’t travel but had many friends who traveled out of the states.
There’s a better way:
Birthright citizenship applies solely to the child. Pass a law making it clear the parents of that child, be they illegals or birth tourists, will never be allowed to become citizens, or stay in America under any circumstances, other than those that already define asylum or refugee status. They can take their child home with them, or see it raised by an institution, or adopted by American citizens.
No chain migration, no family reunification, no nothing. You live as a family in your home nation, or watch your kid grow up from a distance.
Completely agree with those.
Would add that a federal voting eligibility rule should be implemented prohibiting those ‘citizens’ from registering to vote anywhere in the U.S. until after they have physically lived full-time in the U.S. for at least 10 continuous years, and of course meeting all other eligibility rules.
I have to think this one through. It sounds good on the surface, we would need to make sure there are no loop holes to slide in under. I absolutely think we can get rid of chain migration, it’s not Constitutional and can be shut down. That will support the initiative immensely. Ppl will not come if they can’t bring family. Cracking down on gate crashers, ending chain migration will impact this unethical process in a good way.
This is not “a better way.”
Prevention is the best medicine = pure wisdom that’s persevered, bc it’s true. Your proposal will never work because no one with a beating heart (READ: a believer in Christ) would approve of such an outlandishly cruel policy that on its face is fine with creating orphans by choice.
Not gonna happen.
Human trafficking is a crime.
Children born from human Trafficking in American are Americans, so sayeth the law.
So put them in the foster system, let them be raised American, and prosecute the human traffickers.
Birthright Citizenship means a Foreign Nation only needs an
Army of pregnant Illegal Alien women to take over the USA.
Communist China is already implementing this plan.
Other Foreign Nations are doing the same thing.
No visas at all, no entry at all excepts for biological males on an as needed basis.
What standards for pregnancy tests should there be? I would imagine a great many foreign women are going to get a fake test result or even a real doctor to fake a medical certificate and probably a hundred other dodges to show they are not pregnant when they really are and planning to have their child delivered in the U.S. These tests need to be real and verifiable.
Other foreign women may arrive not pregnant but plan to get pregnant in the U.S. and then manage one way or another to still be here 9 months later to have the child in the U.S. What to do about those?
it’s the process of having to do all this that makes the Roberts Requirement a highlighted burden, a pain in the a$$.
We could also require only a certain test that’s produced in the US and whose fee is reimbursed to the Treasury. It would be charged directly to the alien who could then file for reimbursement from the government plan of the country of origin, or their private health insurance, or directly out-of-pocket.
Let’s make SURE that the testing mechanism in neither made in Chyna, nor by any company owned or controlled by them.
Should go without explicitly saying so, but, ummmm, I dunno if I trust the Chamber of (horrors) Commerce nor those under it’s lobbying influence.
Pregnancy tests are quick. There’s no reason not to have them available at the airport, before they board a plane, and/or at ports of entry. This will require staffing, but the money saved will far exceed employment costs.
Perfecto!
Three Cheers for your most excellent proposal, SD! I second that motion.
I love this so much! Fight fire with fire –
You have a great idea there. I am calling my congressman and if everyone does, maybe some action will come about. Disgusting decision made and we have a disgusting senate leader also. Johnson however, has turned out to be better than expected.
You mean congresswoman don’t you?
I posted a very similar suggestion for regulations. 6 month Visa is the longest available and negative pregnancy test presented to gain entry. I like yours better with the ability to extend upon presentation of negative pregnancy test.
Well said!
Why give them 10 days? Make them take the test at the airports? Results in minutes. I’m so f’ing tired of Roberts and Comey is gaining ground.
You mean the departure airport do you not? If the airport is here then it’s too late.
A further clause needs to be added to the long term solution to this problem.
Any citizen who gained US citizenship through birthright citizenship is permanently prohibited from any chain migration of any family member or from sponsoring any other non citizen to enter the USA for ever. The mother, and potentially father, or their broader family, should never be allowed to benefit from birthright citizenship.
I can see airlines making those times supply to international flight to avoid fines that could be imposed.
Brilliant idea
Make it 50 yo females because then there won’t be exceptional situations.
Jerome Corsi is also talking about another way to get the SAVE Act legislation implemented via an Emergency order.
x
We should look to Singapore’s visa restrictions for inspiration.
Singapore heavily regulates pregnancy and family planning based on the type of work visa a migrant holds.
1) Low-Wage Work Permit Holders (e.g., Domestic Workers, Construction)
The Rules: Female migrant workers holding basic Work Permits are strictly forbidden from becoming pregnant during their employment.
The Consequences: Workers must take mandatory biannual pregnancy tests. If a worker gets pregnant, her work permit is canceled, and she is immediately deported. She is also permanently blacklisted from working in Singapore.
Marriage Bans: These workers are not allowed to marry a Singapore citizen or permanent resident without prior written permission from the Ministry of Manpower
2) Medical & Travel Visitors (Tourists / Short-Term):
The Rules: Pregnant tourists can visit Singapore on a short-term basis. However, for safety and capacity reasons, pregnant women who are far along in their pregnancies (usually beyond 28 to 36 weeks) face strict restrictions imposed by commercial airlines
Rampant corruption during muh k0v!d, no change WRT this measure.
This will not stop anything.
I beg to differ. Many, many people did not travel during the WWH (World Wide Hoax), as a direct result of the restrictions.