What is proposed below is regulatory, lawful and entirely intended to create hardships and burdens. Thus, a new era in State Department visa requirements respond to newly established guidelines by the Supreme Court.
As a pragmatic and patriotic American I respectfully suggest and recommend the U.S. State Department immediately institute the “Roberts Requirement” following similar visa entry protocols previously used for COVID-19 tests prior to U.S. admittance.
The Roberts Requirement: Each female visa applicant must present a valid negative pregnancy test taken no longer than 10 days prior to travel to the United States.
The certified document, negative pregnancy test, together with all related visa approvals must be presented to Customs and Border Patrol at each port of entry. Failure disqualifies the traveler.
This is the same protocol as COVID-19, only using pregnancy status as the disqualifying health issue. It is a lawful regulation, born from a new standard established by the Supreme Court, that does not need congressional approval.
Don’t get stuck on details about why it will not work, it will.
Start thinking like a person who realizes the goal is to create severe antagonism through regulation. That antagonism can then be directed.
Aim isolation, ridicule and marginalization at those who created the problem. This can be done without visible vitriol.
The objective is not just making sure pregnant women do not get visas; that is one small element. The bigger objective is to make it extremely difficult to come to the USA and THEN pin that global compliance requirement on Chief Justice John Roberts, making him live every day with the consequences of his blinded American stupidity; facing him, belittling him, ridiculing him, sitting on the front pages of his peers and global friends.
Chief Justice John Roberts created this mess, now put it on his doorstep every day.
But people will lie – doesn’t matter.
But people will create fake documents – doesn’t matter.
But people will still overstay their visas – doesn’t matter.
You are putting the emphasis on the wrong aspect.
Make every overburdensome visa rule and travel permit regulation specifically attributable to John Roberts decision. Pre-screenings, pregnancy tests, supplemental bond requirements for 15-to 45-year-old females, shortened visa terms and much more.
No exclusions for diplomats, sports figures, foreign actors, employees, H1Bs, student entry or any other visa type – the works. Make the total visa entry system subject to a regulatory and compliance nightmare at a scale that is unheard of. That is the scale of the problem Roberts has created. Now blame John Roberts for it.
This ‘Roberts Requirement’ applies to all visa types.
The objective, and it can accompany many other requirements such as a “bond” attachment required for 15- to 45-year-old females to travel, is to create such an overwhelmingly restrictive visa process that it creates ridicule on the SCOTUS decision.
Make every regulation specifically cited to the Supreme Court decision and make it exceptionally burdensome.
Make SCOTUS own the outcome.
Canadians and Mexicans also need to comply. The same rules apply to every nation and no longer are visas determined by timeline, but by the number of extensions required or allowed within it.
Every visa has a maximum duration of 3 months, with various extensions possible.
A one-year visa becomes a three-month visa with 4 extensions allowed. At each extension the same origination requirements must be fulfilled.
A two-year USA visa, is now a U.S. visa with 7 extensions allowed, etc.
Student visas carry the same requirement for 3-month extensions.
Require a – refundable at exit – surety bond purchase valued at $500,000 for any non-tourist visa. [Later the bond issuer, sell those non-refunded bonds and release the bounty hunters.]
No visas are exempt from the entry requirements.
This is a new era with new rules that specifically come as an outcome of new judicial rulings. This is not a White House or State Department issue. This is an issue created by the Supreme Court that needs an immediate response.
Congress can fix it, but in the interim – maximum regulatory pressure is applied directly to the wound.
♦ Example of point and counterpoints.
POINT: Canada, Mexico, India or [XXX] will scream this is unfair given the nature of our collaborative visa designations.
Counterpoint: Yes, you are correct. That was then; this is now. The nature of our visa system has changed because SCOTUS has just codified new distinctions on citizenship that now become new visa factors. Your nation does not convey birthright citizenship, so I understand your inability to accept our new terms. Unfortunately, our nation now does convey birthright citizenship, and as a consequence changes are needed.
Don’t back down. Make SCOTUS own it.
Sure, there will be legal challenges, all the way up to the same SCOTUS, and what are they going to do?
Think about it!
Make everyone live by the new rules – that are created by those who didn’t think about the consequences.
Classic!
Excellent Idea! Frankly, no one can convince Robert’s isn’t compromised! And Barrett? I think she has a serious case of TDS, such that many of her decisions are simply to defy the Trump Administration!
“convince me that…”
Colloquial/casual grammar of one who likely knows the difference.
👍
It wasn’t that the decision was not what I wanted (but didn’t expect to get) it is the appalling and insidious reasoning behind it. It plants a deadly seed whose growth could ultimately choke out the very source of our liberty. Just read it, or Clarence Thomas’ precient criticism in his dissent. That man is God’s gift.
Kavanaugh’s opinion was that the EO was not the constitutional vehicle to define birthright citizens, that it was Congress’ job. He did not opine on what “subject to the jurisdiction:” was because he said the question was whether the EO was the correct vehicle which, to be fair, I kind of agree with.. Based on how Roberts punts so often on big decisions, I am surprised he didn’t follow Kavanaugh. That would have left open the definition of birthright citizenship for another day instead of this ridiculous decision.
Question: if subject to the jurisdiction of means just being on US soil, why did Congress have to pass the Indian Citizenship Act in 1924?
Citizens From Sea to Shining Sea
Now will the Great Chief Justice go and walk among his new blood brothers, as his father the Great Chief Coolidge did before him?
https://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/cph.3c11409
https://www.yahoo.com/news/reflections-100th-anniversary-indian-citizenship-041839793.html
http://www.milwaukeeindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/060424_NativeAmericansVotingRights.jpg
Agreed. They are both impostors and very bad selections from the get go!
I think they should include transexuals as well.
That’s funny! Can you imagine the howls of rage?
brilliant!
perhaps a US government doctors office for extensions like our DMV
which currently frustrates every person who has to go there
(realizing that fraud can/will occur there as well)
make it as inconvenient as possible – 2/3 hour drive
and don’t forget self avowed “constitutional conservative” Amy Barrett
She was a bad choice and is a big disappointment.
She thinks she’s smarter than everyone else.
excellent idea of law,no one can come here for birth,
FAFO.
FA…..
🎯
That is literally what Sundance’s proposed regulation addresses.
🤔😲😎
It is probably just a coincidence that this Mr Roberts and his millionaire wife (who just happens to have a hyphenated Sullivan in her name) managed to adopt two Irish babies against the existing Irish adoption laws. The poor babies miraculously became “South American” for the purpose.
It may have some connection to his Birth Right stance.
Just speculation of course.
And it was probably just a coincidence that all four female justices voted along with Roberts for this injustice. What’s going on with that?
I was referring, of course, to the birthright citizenship fiasco.
ACB has two adopted kids from Haiti..
Yeah, but not with an Irish accent I suppose.
Post this on every wall in the White House and state department. A must read memo stamped “time sensitive, immediate action required” for every member of the administration.
Oooh buddy! Could we have some fun with this! To make this new rule “equitable” …….everyone must show proof of not being pregnant! Guys, sorry, this means y’all too! Make this new rule hurt! Force “reciprocal birth right citizenship” clauses! Just a little sarc and snark!
I was thinking we would need to demand a test from everyone because a rapidly burgeoning business changing foreign pregnant women’s passports sex to “men” would explode. Then “they” would argue the baby be granted citizenship for whatever their stupid reason of the day is.
We will also need to watch for the foreign “marriage” business to boom to try to get around this idea.
And include those males that identify as females, we want to be broadminded.
“Visas? We ain’t got no visas! We don’t need no visas!! I don’t have to show you any steenking visas!!!” – The Treasure of the US Welfare State Madre
Grok made this for me in an instant. Click to view:
What a wickedly delightful way to begin my Wednesday morning, reading this article & comments!
Count me as an emphatic “YES” vote !
PS – Sundance’s brilliant idea is just another one in a long string of reasons that I contribute financially to this website every month.
😎😎
Alan Dershowitz said Tuesday that President Donald Trump demonstrated a stronger understanding of the Constitution than Chief Justice John Roberts in the Supreme Court’s birthright citizenship decision.
Dershowitz contended Roberts mischaracterized the question before the court by writing that the case was about whether the Constitution guarantees citizenship to children born to parents who are unlawfully or temporarily in the United States.
“Roberts started his decision by misleading the readers,” Dershowitz said
“President Trump is 100% right,” he said. “He can effectively overrule that decision without amending the Constitution simply by an act of Congress.”
https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/alan-dershowitz-donald-trump-supreme-court/2026/06/30/id/1261376/
“He can effectively overrule that decision without amending the Constitution simply by an act of Congress.”
Theoretically. However since our Congress is involved in an open rebellion against the interests of the American people, he can’t.
Ephesians 1:21-23
“Father God put Christ over all rulers, authorities, powers, and kings. He gave him authority over everything that has power in this world or in the next world.
God put everything under Christ’s power and made him head over everything for the church. The church is Christ’s body. It is filled with him. He makes everything complete in every way.”
What are the dangers to a nation of women illegally in that nation or present as a tourist or on a temporary visa being able to birth children who are automatically deemed to be citizens of that nation even when the fathers are also not citizens of that nation?
Grok’s answer:
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/30/june-30th-2026-presidential-politics-trump-administration-day-527/comment-page-2/#comment-12668690
I like it but who in govt has the spine to implement it
“Rep Andy Ogles just introduced the ‘Anchors Away Act’ which bans certain pregnant women who are seeking to give birth here, from entering the U.S. in response to the Supreme Court’s Ruling:”
https://wltreport.com/2026/06/30/congressman-introduces-bill-to-ban-pregnant-foreigners-from-entering-u-s/
Pregnant “people”, please. : ))
She’s right on some things like in her book “Adios America” and this.
Thanks to UniParty Bush:
Souter In Roberts’ Clothing
July 20, 2005 by Ann Coulter
https://anncoulter.com/2005/07/20/souter-in-roberts-clothing3/
After pretending to consider various women and minorities for the Supreme Court these past few weeks, President Bush decided to disappoint all the groups he had just ginned up and nominate a white male.
So all we know about him for sure is that he can’t dance and he probably doesn’t know who Jay-Z is. Other than that, he is a blank slate. Tabula rasa. Big zippo. Nada. Oh, yeah … We also know he’s argued cases before the Supreme Court. Big deal; so has Larry Flynt’s attorney.
But unfortunately, other than that that, we don’t know much about John Roberts. Stealth nominees have never turned out to be a pleasant surprise for conservatives. Never. Not ever.
[snip]
This trap was set long ago when the amendment was authored. It is obvious there is enough wiggle room in the language to give weak justices room to make poor decisions.
This is the problem with constitutional amendments is the slick language that can be used to drive a truck through it to get a hidden agenda.
I think no one has the fortitude to do the administration of this proposal. It might highlight Roberts as a fool, but the bureaucracy is not going to accept it.
This should be fixed with a law. But we don’t have lawmakers, we have actors with agenda handlers and it goes back to the reason the Senate is not passing the Save America Act. They can’t because they would all be out a ‘job”. Or should I say a grift…
Keep praying folks. That is the only power we have. It got us this far, it will win the day.
Thanks be to God ~ God bless America!
Just as when I immigrated to America, I had to be examined and have medical tests done by an approved doctor. That will make the process even more complicated before they are approved.
Then once they land they have to take a stick test with an agent standing over them.
WITH DEFERENCE TO WORDMAN:
<Then once they land they have to take a stick test with an agent standing over them>
But if you pass the stick test, urine!
Isaiah 55:11 So shall my word be, which shall go forth from my mouth: it shall not return to me void, but it shall do whatsoever I please, and shall prosper in the things for which I sent it.
Or in the words of Yul Brenner, “So shall it be written, so shall it be done”
One of my favorite scriptures. One of my favorite movie lines.
The Roberts Requirement is pure genius! And while we’re at it, using regulatory powers that already exist, I suggest that we use the Selective Service System to create a new classification for our newly classified “citizens”. Since they jumped the line to citizenship, put them at the front of the line for military service.
I’m not so sure that I would trust some of these so-called “citizens” serving in my military. Unless they have been thoroughly investigated, vetted and proven to be worthy of protecting our nation at home and abroad.
I share your concerns, especially if they were to serve in the DEI military of years past. In our traditional military, however, they would either learn to be good citizens or serve time in a federal prison, be stripped of their “birthright citizenship” and be deported.
I would add:
Optionally,
CBP maintains
the right to test
when she arrives here in the MotherLand.
Yes…we should require the documentation on arrival and then charge them for our test also.
Sounds like a winner to me.
These are great ideas. I would also add that there should be a law that there is no dual citizenship and make that effective upon birth. Your baby can’t go back to China and be a Chinese citizen without forfeiting their American citizenship.
If our spineless leaders won’t do anything, then states need to pass a law that no one holding dual citizenship can hold any office in the state. Deny these infiltrators the ability to hold office in local government and it will be harder for them to rise in state and federal elections.
NO DUAL Citizenship!!! It’s crazy to allow it!!
Well that sure as hell didn’t stop Obamaramadingdong, did it?
Since no one can tell who is male or female anymore, all humans of all ages must take a pregnancy test (at their own expense) at a border patrol office before being admitted to our country. Or before being allowed to exit planes in the US.
These justices are comprised , immoral, and have just suicided our country.
I can’t imagine anything that an enemy could have done that would destroy our country faster or more thoroughly.
Removal of illegals and VISA holders must be put on speed dial immediately.
I am convinced that some of these justices are compromised, stupid, demon possessed or all the above. And many more of our senators and representatives fit that description, too. These people may not answer to “We the People” but they will answer to God Almighty one of these days!
El Rushbo used to call his program’s purpose was “illustrating absurdity,” I believe SD’s “Robert’s requirement” for travel is making Rush roll with laughter.
Perfect. The union of travel and immigration.
Haven’t finished reading all the comments, but ‘gee’ wonder why the new movie Citizen Vigilante is number 1 on Amazon?????
“Roberts Requirement”
A thing of beauty.
“Every visa has a maximum duration of 3 months, with various extensions possible.” Require a new pregnancy test to accompany the visa extension request.
Sundance, your response to the Robert’s Decision is Solomon-like. Thank you.
Wisdom indeed.
man that’s a great policy outline. The State Department can copy/paste.
If PDJT gets another SCOTUS appointment, he should consider non-ivy league and Protestant. Purely as a practical matter, it’s the best way to ensure a slam-dunk Constitutional originalist.
Good to see you picked up on my idea from yesterday’s thread re pregnancy tests for all females coming to the USA. I love the idea of branding it the Roberts Requirement.
I think you need to attack a piece of judicial idiocy with a bigger piece of bureaucratic idiocy in order to generate a positive outcome – sort of like how when you multiply two negative numbers you get a positive. Call it the Judicial Negative Consequence Paradox – where an idiotic ruling is met with an even more idiotic law to force the system to return to a positive legal state.
Thank you!!
Everyone must go BACK
Grant diplomatic immunity to any foreign woman aged 15 to 45. She cannot be arrested and imprisoned. She can only be apprehended and deported.
I like the way Sundance thinks. 🙂
There is also another point somewhere in here.
Unequal application of the law.
I’m an applicant for legal US citizenship.
I want to assimilate and I am willing to study and take any citizenship test required.
I have to wait great periods of time before I can possibly gain that citizenship.
Look at the hoops I have to jump through, willingly, compared to the “birthrighter”.
Department of Education should impose a civics test that every high schooler must pass in order to graduate. It should be the citizenship test we require legal immigrants to pass for their citizenship. Hold up federal funds if the states decline to impose this test.
The reason we have so many college students and young Americans pushing for socialism is that they don’t know the foundation of our government. Obama”s Department of Education did away with Civics classes as part of a core curriculum, and the ignorance of Millennials certainly shows.
Great ideas get more exposure!
The GATEWAY PUNDIT has quoted Sundance’s suggestion in an article headlined on their website.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/07/pass-roberts-requirement-require-pregnancy-tests-female-travelers/
Kudos Sundance!
great idea and hilarious as well!
If Trump could do this, two businesses would immediately spring up.
1. Changing pregnant women passports to identify as men. LBTQ arguments aside, the baby will be born on American soil.
2. Smuggling pregnant women in and hiding them until delivery. Again, baby born on American soil.
What about being born on ships in American ports?
Where there’s a well of free money there is a way.
Oh.. and #3 would be fake marriage$ to American citizens that last just long enough for the baby to be born on American soil to a father who is legal American citizen.
younwill never stop everybody, but at least this kind of measure makes it much harder for most and will therefore deter a great many.
Brilliant. This is the angle.
Since foreigners could just print out fraudulent pregnancy tests to present at foreign airports ( akin to Indian diploma mills for H1-B visas for fake tech workers), have the pregnancy tests (urine and blood beta HCG) administered at customs with qualified US Customs staff administering the tests upon arrival; if positive, passengers sent home. They are also put on no fly list if present original negative paperwork but have positive labs here. Yes, sometimes there will be delay of test turning positive but it’s up to th not having sex for 20 days before.
I still don’t think the US government has reimbursed southern California hospitals which had lines of Mexican and Central American pregnant illegal aliens out the door of our maternity wards since the 1980s. It was widespread public knowledge that this was going on. Our own citizens had to pay higher healthcare and tax costs so as to keep our local hospitals from going insolvent.
250,000 illegal alien births a year in the US…7% of ALL births in US each year . 68% being Mexican or Central American.
Roberts and Barrett are worse than Quisling. How could they reinterpret the goals and frank meaning of the authors of the 14 amendment with all the actual supporting speeches and documentation?
I say that state department needs to take away their passports if the travel overseas and try to return. No more trips to Eisen’s palace in Czechia.
We need to prohibit these anchor babies from being the impetus to granting family members citizenship. If they want to be citizens, they need to follow the normal process.
Time for Trump DOJ to investigate McCord’s hubby Shook about his role in leaking Roe reversal documents on behalf of Roberts. Time to can that rogue jerk.
What if as part of the consequences of illegals that are the parents of the child are immediately deported permanently and never allowed to become citizens and never allowed welfare etc.?
This absolutely has to get to President Trump. His merely mentioning this fabulous idea will eliminate the need for fireworks this July 4th, because all of the leftist heads will be exploding. Are there any friendly media type who could suggest this idea to the president during one of his frequent press visits?
The title and a brief explanation should be put in the comment section of every publication running an article about this. Most will not allow links, which is why the title needs to be part of the comment.
Brilliant! And absolutely perfect name “The Roberts Requirement.” His “birthright” added to the other choices he has made.
Fully agree!! Make it excruciatingly difficult for a pregnant woman to enter the country or just can they simply ban the entry of any pregnant woman until after the baby is born?
Reside — to dwell permanently and continuously, occupy a place as one’s legal domicile. These moron’s overlook that word as if it does not exist.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they (RESIDE). So, how does a temporary visa’s equal I reside in the United States?
I like how Sundance thinks, no pregnant women enters the U.S. period.