What is proposed below is regulatory, lawful and entirely intended to create hardships and burdens. Thus, a new era in State Department visa requirements respond to newly established guidelines by the Supreme Court.
As a pragmatic and patriotic American I respectfully suggest and recommend the U.S. State Department immediately institute the “Roberts Requirement” following similar visa entry protocols previously used for COVID-19 tests prior to U.S. admittance.
The Roberts Requirement: Each female visa applicant must present a valid negative pregnancy test taken no longer than 10 days prior to travel to the United States.
The certified document, negative pregnancy test, together with all related visa approvals must be presented to Customs and Border Patrol at each port of entry. Failure disqualifies the traveler.
This is the same protocol as COVID-19, only using pregnancy status as the disqualifying health issue. It is a lawful regulation, born from a new standard established by the Supreme Court, that does not need congressional approval.
Don’t get stuck on details about why it will not work, it will.
Start thinking like a person who realizes the goal is to create severe antagonism through regulation. That antagonism can then be directed.
Aim isolation, ridicule and marginalization at those who created the problem. This can be done without visible vitriol.
The objective is not just making sure pregnant women do not get visas; that is one small element. The bigger objective is to make it extremely difficult to come to the USA and THEN pin that global compliance requirement on Chief Justice John Roberts, making him live every day with the consequences of his blinded American stupidity; facing him, belittling him, ridiculing him, sitting on the front pages of his peers and global friends.
Chief Justice John Roberts created this mess, now put it on his doorstep every day.
But people will lie – doesn’t matter.
But people will create fake documents – doesn’t matter.
But people will still overstay their visas – doesn’t matter.
You are putting the emphasis on the wrong aspect.
Make every overburdensome visa rule and travel permit regulation specifically attributable to John Roberts decision. Pre-screenings, pregnancy tests, supplemental bond requirements for 15-to 45-year-old females, shortened visa terms and much more.
No exclusions for diplomats, sports figures, foreign actors, employees, H1Bs, student entry or any other visa type – the works. Make the total visa entry system subject to a regulatory and compliance nightmare at a scale that is unheard of. That is the scale of the problem Roberts has created. Now blame John Roberts for it.
This ‘Roberts Requirement’ applies to all visa types.
The objective, and it can accompany many other requirements such as a “bond” attachment required for 15- to 45-year-old females to travel, is to create such an overwhelmingly restrictive visa process that it creates ridicule on the SCOTUS decision.
Make every regulation specifically cited to the Supreme Court decision and make it exceptionally burdensome.
Make SCOTUS own the outcome.
Canadians and Mexicans also need to comply. The same rules apply to every nation and no longer are visas determined by timeline, but by the number of extensions required or allowed within it.
Every visa has a maximum duration of 3 months, with various extensions possible.
A one-year visa becomes a three-month visa with 4 extensions allowed. At each extension the same origination requirements must be fulfilled.
A two-year USA visa, is now a U.S. visa with 7 extensions allowed, etc.
Student visas carry the same requirement for 3-month extensions.
Require a – refundable at exit – surety bond purchase valued at $500,000 for any non-tourist visa. [Later the bond issuer, sell those non-refunded bonds and release the bounty hunters.]
No visas are exempt from the entry requirements.
This is a new era with new rules that specifically come as an outcome of new judicial rulings. This is not a White House or State Department issue. This is an issue created by the Supreme Court that needs an immediate response.
Congress can fix it, but in the interim – maximum regulatory pressure is applied directly to the wound.
♦ Example of point and counterpoints.
POINT: Canada, Mexico, India or [XXX] will scream this is unfair given the nature of our collaborative visa designations.
Counterpoint: Yes, you are correct. That was then; this is now. The nature of our visa system has changed because SCOTUS has just codified new distinctions on citizenship that now become new visa factors. Your nation does not convey birthright citizenship, so I understand your inability to accept our new terms. Unfortunately, our nation now does convey birthright citizenship, and as a consequence changes are needed.
Don’t back down. Make SCOTUS own it.
Sure, there will be legal challenges, all the way up to the same SCOTUS, and what are they going to do?
Think about it!
Make everyone live by the new rules – that are created by those who didn’t think about the consequences.
Could someone explain the Roberts Regulations? I don’t quite remember the Rona years I was to busy dying from being unjabbed
Read the article
Please don’t ask us to explain this to you. Read all supporting articles to get yourself up to speed.
Exacting!, as it should be. Thank you.
AOCB and Roberts have been waiting to stick it to PDJT and the political right and demonstrate their fealty to the left in the most dramatic way-they found their case to do it-and you can only imagine they are geeful and receiving all the praise from all the right people they have been waiting so long to receive.
For abortion to be healthcare, pregnancy would have to be a disease. So, there should be no problem testing for that disease and disallowing entrance if positive for it.
Also, termination of parental rights. By coming to the United States illegally or legally for the sole reason of giving birth the mother is admitting that her home country is not suitable to raise an American child. Send the mother back and put the kid up for adoption. 🤔
Since so many countries are embracing the trans movement, it would be wise to include all “trans men” in the requirement for pre-entry pregnancy testing.
Just in case they get pregnant. LOL
Tanpon Timmy will have a fit of apoplexy.
😁
“trans women” too
just to tongue-tie-scramble them as they attempt explanations why not
Im trying to understand…..regardless of immigration status….you get in and have a child the child is automatically a cirizen.
Congress must act on the Roberts grenade. Its madness.
Not going to happen!
You are missing the point entirely.
Congress?
Seriously?
I love it!
We could get rid of Roberts through lawfare and make the vote 6-3 next time. Roberts covered-up for his CoS who leaked one of the Supreme Court’s unpublished rulings.
Ed Martin was investigating last year.
Both ACB and Robert’s have adopted foreign born children.
Wondering if this affected their thinking about this.
Does this not mean a conflict of interest and the two should have recused themselves in the vote?
Those foreign adoptions are likely the source of the blackmail being used against them.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/
I just emailed President Trump about this. Let’s Go!
Great!
I was going to say “Push this out to ALL conservative voices”
like Stephen Miller and Jesse Waters, whom I’m watching speak on this topic right now on Fox TV News
And all conservative mouthpieces having any substantial media reach at all
Any baby born in the U.S. by an illegal alien becomes an automatic burden to all legal U,S. citizens paying taxes. Any regulation to prevent that is very much needed.
I like Sundance’s idea. This is a war by foreigners, and some SC members, on America. Game on.
How would this impact illegal aliens? Would this give a better rationale for them to be deported? Asylum seekers?
The Booger Rule…no visas for anyone for the foreseeable future
And as soon as we have a Democrat in the White House, they’ll undo the whole thing. What’s the point?
Get the SAVE America Act passed and no Democrat would ever win again.
“Make everyone live by the new rules – that are created by those who didn’t think about the consequences.”
They knew the consequences. They just don’t care.
The problem isn’t tourists coming here legally for vacation. The problem is millions of illegal immigrants coming here permanently and having babies that we pay for!
true, but it’s easier to crystallize the birth tourism issue … it’s immediately transparent to any reasoning mind
Tourist are a problem too. Close the border and the illegal problem goes away.
Birth tourism is a long range danger. They are born here so have citizenship, but taken home and indocrinated to hate and envy the US and return to subvert our country, run in our elections and spy for China industrially, politically and militarily. China looks at the long haul to defeat the US without risking war.
LOVE it!!!!👍👏
I’ve always advocated taking the “Rules for Radicals” and turning them around on them… They hate that!
President Trump is on to that…..🇺🇸🇺🇸
Several commenters in the prior story mentioned pregnancy tests in this same context. I found this to be a great idea. But pinning this on Roberts, it is thrilling to imagine Sundance’s superb suggestion actually happening. Dare I hope? Yes, with VSGPDJT, perhaps…
Thanks Sundance!
Absolutely!
I immediately begin to think of regulations the State Dept. can impose on female (of child bearing ages) visas. The Trump Admin can have fun with this one!
This is truly a National Emergency!
Income Taxes are the #1 reason for Americans leaving the USA & renouncing their citizenship.
Let’s put a significant tax on any person who is born on American soil but lives overseas plus make is increase for every year that person never returns. Also, make it a requirement that they also have to own a home here in the states with a valid residential address – apartments or more than a husband and wife can use the same address.
Help list the ideas!
The CBO should be required to do a thorough short and long term cost analysis of the costs associated with unfettered access to US citizenship now codified by the un-supremes. A new emergency Robert’s tax should be implemented and paid quarterly by all human bodies categorized as American citizens. Non citizens who have birthed an anchor baby will pay taxes for each child birthed. No income exclusions. Federal crime if taxes not paid.
Everyone wants this right? It’s the humane thing to do right?
Of course, the GREAT SUNDANCE HAS IT ALL FIGURED OUT TO PERFECTION!!
Earlier this day I tweeted this:
Sundance. thank you for your insight.
We can only hope some of the right ears are listening.
No one is coming to save us now…
We got three horrible decisions by the Supreme Court this week proving that the Supreme Court is not going to come to our rescue on anything especially election fraud.
The Senate is refusing to pass the SAVE AMERICA ACT and they’re not going to save us.
A victory in Iran isn’t in the cards so that’s not going to save us.
The only thing that will save us is an overwhelming victory in November 2026 and 2028 and that requires…
A: $60 Oil
B: $2 Gas
C: 2% Inflation
D: 3% Mortgages
E: 2% Car loans
President Trump should be getting back to the basics that won the 2016 and 2024 Presidential Elections! These side trips off the reservation are killing us! 😎
What will save us is not a “thing” but a person. His name is Jesus Christ:
ll Cron. 7:14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
We’ve always needed that but we now need it more than ever. The enemy is in the camp.
Give it up troll. No one is fooled anymore.
LOL Sane minds do think alike. 😉 You’d be surprised at how the post-Roberts chatter is running along these lines, to screen for pregnancy status when issuing visas. I must say that the surety bond is a nice touch.
The Roberts court (I can’t even say the ‘Supreme Court’ anymore as it’s clear that Thomas and Alito are as disgusted with this betrayal as all other patriots) has bent over backwards to emphasize that the President is in charge of immigration, and he is vested with determining who gets into this country. In line with this reasoning, and consequent on the birthright travesty, we can expect to now become off-limits to pregnant foreign females, of any class or social status.
This takes me back to a small discussion on these boards some months ago, with regard to Trump allowing hundreds of thousands of Chinese nationals to enter the country as college students. In light of the Roberts travesty, what was a questionable and unwise decision before becomes a horrendous decision now, that must be looked at again. As the President acknowledged in his Truth Social message after the decision, China pays attention to these things. There is no point in helping them ramp up their “fifth column” operation by importing thousands of Chinese students, a number of whom I’m sure will end up “dropping American citizens” during their tenure (excuse the crudeness).
J
He is a trainwreck. Time to retire.
I like the way you think Sundance. Extra Cheetos for you this month.
I just happen to know a guy who is really great at branding things with a name that sticks… 😎
Good idea.
U.S. citizenship can be lost by officially renouncing it, generally completed in person before a U.S. consular or diplomatic officer outside the United States.
The prospective parents should renounce citizenship on behalf of any child born in the US, and more importantly, permanently renounce themselves from ever becoming US citizens, or ever voting, as a condition of entry.
We should change the rules for dual or multiple citizenship.
Recommend ages 12 to 60 just to be safe.
I like this, but let’s put the onus on both SCOTUS traitors and call it the Roberts Coney Barrett Requirement!
While we’re at it we might concoct some similar impediments to those who vote without I.D.s after the Senate blew its chance to pass the Save America Act and call it the Thune Murkowsky Requirement!
I love how you think Sundance, but does PDJT have the CAHOONS to do this? This may be his last chance to save this Country. And for those women who are here Illegally now?
Just like the Covid documents could be faked, so could pregnancy documents or any other.
My curriculum vitea, my bona fides. I voted for Trump 6 times and know he won the presidency 3 times.
If Trump whines and complains on Truth Social about this ruling, basically what we are doing here (since we are powerless to actually do something in the immediate) and does not make an active and forceful response to the ruling (much like the Roberts Requirement noted here) which he (as “President”) very well can do……..then the 1st day as President Executive Order was only a silly optic that was never meant to amount to anything.
It’s Yoda time…..you either do or you don’t do, there is no try.
I love how you think, Sundance. Pragmatic and lawful with just a touch of “rebel” in there.
How do we get this fast tracked? Does this come under Marco’s job list?
Why can’t congress pass a one-line bill saying the following ‘All such persons born in the United States to parents who lack permanent US residency shall be subject to the jurisdiction of the parents’ home country and returned thereto.”?
Done.
“Canadians and Mexicans also need to comply.”
While I absolutely agree with you, Sundance, I would add:
Close the “Friendship” bridges; all of them.
Make Visa’s a requirement.
No more allowing the children of border towns to arrive at their American schools, each morning.
I used to teach in El Paso. It was very well known that our Border Patrol could see students with their EPISD uniforms on as they sat in their parents vehicles each morning and made the trip across the bridge into El Paso.
So, for that little gratuity, our taxpayers had to pay more teachers and build more schools.
Further, the cartels are much more able to move back and forth across the bridge, too.
Just SHUT IT DOWN. Simple.
Force everyone to file for a Visa. Every. Single. Time.
I love this idea. Make them own it! Ridiculous Roberts deserves the ridicule and I’m here for it.
I approve of this message!
Are we actually going to implement all these restrictions, or is this just a wish list? I certainly hope the administration does. This USSC decision is garbage.
When you find yourself imprisoned within a toxic system, scrupulous compliance with its rules can be the best way to throw a sabot into the gears of the malicious machinery.
I am a Conservative.
I believe in the rule of law.
If the law is indeed an ass, then use it against those who would destroy you with it.