What is proposed below is regulatory, lawful and entirely intended to create hardships and burdens. Thus, a new era in State Department visa requirements respond to newly established guidelines by the Supreme Court.
As a pragmatic and patriotic American I respectfully suggest and recommend the U.S. State Department immediately institute the “Roberts Requirement” following similar visa entry protocols previously used for COVID-19 tests prior to U.S. admittance.
The Roberts Requirement: Each female visa applicant must present a valid negative pregnancy test taken no longer than 10 days prior to travel to the United States.
The certified document, negative pregnancy test, together with all related visa approvals must be presented to Customs and Border Patrol at each port of entry. Failure disqualifies the traveler.
This is the same protocol as COVID-19, only using pregnancy status as the disqualifying health issue. It is a lawful regulation, born from a new standard established by the Supreme Court, that does not need congressional approval.
Don’t get stuck on details about why it will not work, it will.
Start thinking like a person who realizes the goal is to create severe antagonism through regulation. That antagonism can then be directed.
Aim isolation, ridicule and marginalization at those who created the problem. This can be done without visible vitriol.
The objective is not just making sure pregnant women do not get visas; that is one small element. The bigger objective is to make it extremely difficult to come to the USA and THEN pin that global compliance requirement on Chief Justice John Roberts, making him live every day with the consequences of his blinded American stupidity; facing him, belittling him, ridiculing him, sitting on the front pages of his peers and global friends.
Chief Justice John Roberts created this mess, now put it on his doorstep every day.
But people will lie – doesn’t matter.
But people will create fake documents – doesn’t matter.
But people will still overstay their visas – doesn’t matter.
You are putting the emphasis on the wrong aspect.
Make every overburdensome visa rule and travel permit regulation specifically attributable to John Roberts decision. Pre-screenings, pregnancy tests, supplemental bond requirements for 15-to 45-year-old females, shortened visa terms and much more.
No exclusions for diplomats, sports figures, foreign actors, employees, H1Bs, student entry or any other visa type – the works. Make the total visa entry system subject to a regulatory and compliance nightmare at a scale that is unheard of. That is the scale of the problem Roberts has created. Now blame John Roberts for it.
This ‘Roberts Requirement’ applies to all visa types.
The objective, and it can accompany many other requirements such as a “bond” attachment required for 15- to 45-year-old females to travel, is to create such an overwhelmingly restrictive visa process that it creates ridicule on the SCOTUS decision.
Make every regulation specifically cited to the Supreme Court decision and make it exceptionally burdensome.
Make SCOTUS own the outcome.
Canadians and Mexicans also need to comply. The same rules apply to every nation and no longer are visas determined by timeline, but by the number of extensions required or allowed within it.
Every visa has a maximum duration of 3 months, with various extensions possible.
A one-year visa becomes a three-month visa with 4 extensions allowed. At each extension the same origination requirements must be fulfilled.
A two-year USA visa, is now a U.S. visa with 7 extensions allowed, etc.
Student visas carry the same requirement for 3-month extensions.
Require a – refundable at exit – surety bond purchase valued at $500,000 for any non-tourist visa. [Later the bond issuer, sell those non-refunded bonds and release the bounty hunters.]
No visas are exempt from the entry requirements.
This is a new era with new rules that specifically come as an outcome of new judicial rulings. This is not a White House or State Department issue. This is an issue created by the Supreme Court that needs an immediate response.
Congress can fix it, but in the interim – maximum regulatory pressure is applied directly to the wound.
♦ Example of point and counterpoints.
POINT: Canada, Mexico, India or [XXX] will scream this is unfair given the nature of our collaborative visa designations.
Counterpoint: Yes, you are correct. That was then; this is now. The nature of our visa system has changed because SCOTUS has just codified new distinctions on citizenship that now become new visa factors. Your nation does not convey birthright citizenship, so I understand your inability to accept our new terms. Unfortunately, our nation now does convey birthright citizenship, and as a consequence changes are needed.
Don’t back down. Make SCOTUS own it.
Sure, there will be legal challenges, all the way up to the same SCOTUS, and what are they going to do?
Think about it!
Make everyone live by the new rules – that are created by those who didn’t think about the consequences.
Love It
Alinsky’s rules # 4, # 5, # 6, # 8, and # 13 collectively applied . . . assuming that Mr. Rubio and Mr. Homan and Mr. Mullin will play ball.
An excellent rule.
Brilliant, Sundance!
I think that the gals in the Supreme Court need to be tossed in with Roberts.
When women complain about the added burden then just remind them that the females on SCOTUS are the ones who wrote their rulings that brought them on.
Women need to understand that some other women seem to enjoy destroying their “sisters”. Women are the ones who love inviting men into women’s spaces and are not aghast at seeing a man pummel a woman in a boxing match.
So let traveling foreign women know that the women on SCOTUS brought this on. Make their names famous.
Problem is, one of the female justices cannot even describe what a woman is!
That’s ok. Let’s apply it to ALL visas then and eliminate the issue while pinning it on the “justice” who can’t figure it out. Men who want a visa will be outraged by having to take a pregnancy test!
What can she accurately describe?
This concept certainly has merit, but John G. Roberts, jr., is the Chief Justice, and as such solely holds the executive accountability for this grotesque miscarriage.
As a retired Sailor (USN, 02/1982 thru 06/2002), I learned early that the key to shutting down a mutiny is to hang the ringleader. Crush JGR, and the rest will get the message. If they don’t, then repeat the process with the next miscreant-in-charge.
Like this one Kevin; Justice Roberts is captain of the ship, “Supreme Court”, thus he owns executive accountability in all respects Regards, Former U. S. Naval Flight Officer 06/1970-08/1974 & 05/1976-04/1982.
Sounds like a great idea. I vote YES to all of it. Send it to the President SD. Right away.
I agree with Ourlaststand above though. Don’t let the women of the court off the hook especially Barrett. She and Roberts are the main culprits here and they did it on purpose. Give it right back to them and blame them for every word they wrote that changed our citizenship rules.
It is so depressing that even our Supreme Court is now infected with “Death To America” politics on the eve of our 250th Anniversary celebration!
Since we are copying covid fund the pregnancy test and make them do it at the port of entry. Get the pharmaceutial companies on it, they love a good draconian reg.
Yes. That’d genius. Greed can move mountains!
Makes me happy knowing many people in the Trump administration read CTH!
This can happen.
Spread this far and wide.
Esp Chyna w their 1+ Million birthright US citizen voters.
From your mouth to Trump/Rubio ears.
I’m glad we’re friends 😎
You are a genius!
I love this and definitely think it should be a Bill! Sundance, I did send a lot of your words to Cruz and Cronyn. My House Rep wouldn’t accept it through email so I printed out the email and will mail it to him in DC. And I’m thinking about also sending it to my TX State Rep. She’s a good one and wish she was in DC instead of Sessioins.
Almost perfection…but you missed one caveat. The rule needs to apply to all genders. It’s 2026 after all, not just females that can attempt enter the country pregnant.
Sundance your suggestion is brilliant and just might become reality if Trump is listening one way or another. Let us pray
Trump acts on this disgusting ruling swiftly and with his usual genius. I still fear that Blanch is a trojan horse in Trump’s camp of legal warriors but I pray he makes a u turn to the right as did Rubio.
Love the new term of “fetal trafficking”!
The confirmation test before a woman can clear Immigration will weed out faked tests at the country of origin.
“ Take this number into the Testing Room and the nurse will call you. Please drink this bottle of water while you wait.”
China manufacturers a lot of the pregnancy test kits so there is that.
Now that we have FaceID at passport control maybe there can be technology that would scan each person for pregnancy.
“Weed out.” Heh.
Sundance, as you posted on X, don’t forget pregnancy tests for men. And trannys… don’t want to discriminate afterall…
Love it!
No! Administer if here when they arrive at the port of entry so there is less chance of shenanigans.
Absolutely Brilliant! Have a Guiness!
Don’t mind if I do.
I posted that exact idea over at a different site: “Test all visiting women for pregnancy, charge $500,000 bond to enter the US to guarantee they leave before the child’s birth.”
I never imagined WE would be playing by Alinsky Rules, but here we are.
The Lord sure does work in mysterious ways.
What would happen if every immigrant or visitor entering the US had to sign an affidavit before being allowed into the country swearing that they (and any children born during their visit) considered themselves being subject to the jurisdiction of their home country….and denying that they were subject to the jurisdiction of the United States during their temporary visit?
They would still have to obey our laws no matter.
Yes there would be lawsuits on behalf of the child. But ????
What would happen if it is put into law that if you overstay your visa you are not considered subject to the jurisdiction of the United States as of the date your visa expired?
Or if a federal law was passed that stated if you enter the country unlawfully and don’t register with INS within 5 days that you are no longer subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and are considered an unlawful invader?
I am just wondering if there is a tweaking of the Federal laws to adjust that wrongly decided constitutional interpretation by SCOTUS of that phrase?
https://pjmedia.com/athena-thorne/2026/06/30/president-trump-could-end-birth-tourism-and-a-lot-of-birthright-citizenship-with-this-1-simple-trick-n4954532
The provision in immigration law that gives Trump the power to end birthright citizenship:
Under the U.S. Code, the president has broad authority over who may enter our country. Specifically, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(f) (INA Section 212(f)) says:
Bill Melugin
@BillMelugin_
NEW: In department wide memo, DOJ leadership directs all of its U.S. Attorneys across the country to prioritize investigations and prosecutions of birth tourism schemes.
Cont…
Absolutely LUV this! – Please DO!
I like it. Make it so. No more pregnant foreigners in the country. Period. If you’re on a long term visa, then you’ll have to prove your status monthly and get thrown out when you become pregnant.
I would delay the implementation or even the announcement of such a plan until after the midterms. The advantage is now with Republican turnout thaks to the SCOTUS ruling, but if this is implemented now, the momentum will shift back to the Democrats for the midterms as they will then be fired up.
🤔 Maybe the Robert’s / Coney Barrett Rule..
Hart Celler
@8USC12
President Trump should utilize the full authority of his office using INA § 212(f) to minimize the damage of today’s order starting with a proclamation that women of child-bearing years who aren’t legal immigrants are largely barred from the U.S., e.g., no F-2, H-4s, or J-2s.
Cont…
This is the way make the ass hats own this.!You know the ones who decide how we are supposed to carry on and prop up this nation on a daily basis and make their lives livable…..
Hart Celler
@8USC12
Now would be a good time for the administration to end visa-free travel to the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) by Chinese nationals.
Cont…
Brilliant!!!
100%!!!!!
I trust you have shared this with Marco
How about a Federal law that requires judges (including SCOTUS) to be subject to a lie detector test yearly (or every two years, etc) swearing they are not being bribed, threatened, or blackmailed over any rulings they make?
Sounds great to me.
Brilliant! Make Roberts fear the widespread and worldwide ridicule more than he fears whomever is “keeping him in line” at the moment.