Vice President JD Vance was questioned about White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles calling Vance a conspiracy theorist.
Vance embraces the conspiracy label, defines how accurate it is, then delivers a strong set of remarks in defense of Susie Wiles. WATCH:
The overall remarks themselves are not terribly toxic to the White House, but the question of why a chief of staff would sit down for eleven interviews over 11 months with Vanity Fair remains rather curious.
What exactly did Susie Wiles expect was going to happen with all those recorded interviews?
Posted in Big Government, Conspiracy ?, Donald Trump, JD Vance, media bias, President Trump, Uncategorized, USA
In other words, Wiles telling Vanity Fair that President Trump has an alcoholic’s personality is an act of loyalty…???? Wiles may very well say the things that she said in the article to the President. However, she should not have been saying those things to Vanity Fair.
The President has very strong feelings about alcohol, he doesn’t drink.
His brother died young from a heart attack that was the result of his severe alcoholism.
His brother’s struggles, what this did to their family, it had a profound impact on Donald Trump, he’s spoken about all this.
So this comment by Susie Wiles was quite a shockingly low, personal attack against the President.
This wasn’t just your usual insult that he hears all day..
Fire her now!
Fire with Malice, and kick out Blondie too, Todd Blanche, etc
I have to disagree. I’ve known several people during my life who would themselves say they had an alcoholic mentality but never touched a drink. It just has to do with ones personality. They are usually high strung, always thinking, prone to mood swings, but often highly intelligent and capable. I don’t think it would bother Trump at all.
I think the ONLY thing that makes it an issue is the Legacy Media’s tendency to try and jump on any negative concerning Trump. We all know that so if someone throws them a bone we react in ‘horror’….when we should probably laugh. Most people understand that they will never get a positive image of Trump from them anyway.
BTW Sundance and others ask why she does it. They do it for the money. Money answers most questions.
Why Vanity Fair?
Wouldn’t referring to him as a ‘workaholic’ or ‘triple A type personality’ be more fitting?
I’ve never heard of referring to a non-drink or drug user as having an ‘alcoholic personality’… but what do I know.
I haven’t either. It was a strange choice of words for the point she supposedly was trying to make.
I believe where one has dealt with an active alcoholic in their life who stops drinking at some point but still exhibits “alcoholic” thinking is a real thing – that is, maybe the person raised hell as an alcoholic but managed to stop and stay “dry” but they are what might be also called a “dry drunk” – someone who hasn’t done their inventory, is still carrying the weight of the world, is mad they had to stop drinking or perhaps die from cirrhosis or get a wet brain – but they look around at everyone else having a good time, so they think and they are just really in a turmoil.
But I do not think that is President Trump! He never even drank and avoided the other things that started in his generation (eg, smoking pot). His mind is beautifully clean and clear like a crystal, he has worked all of his life to achieve the things he sets out to do and then goes ahead and does them.
He has faith in himself, which is an example for all of us. I am not saying he is the most perfect person and an example of that to me is what he said about the Reiner tragedy, that was not good and I am hoping he will apologize.
Maybe he does not get enough sleep and I am sure the First Lady Melania is constantly endeavoring to see that he gets more sleep – I mean, sufficient for him (not sufficient perhaps for us mere mortals).
Susie Wiles it seems to me is projecting onto President Trump her own family issues with her father’s alcoholism and alcoholic behavior and it was an incredible faux pas, to say the least! So it was either deliberate (and she should be fired) or she is so stupid (and she should be fired).
I agree with you.
The reason I think she said it is because it seems by this she is a narcissist. She had a famous alcoholic father and reports are she dealt with that and “helped” him.
Susie sees the world through that prism.
She could have said “the President is a workaholic.” Or she could have said, “the President is addicted to work.”
But no, she used a derogatory term that has meaning in her life and also is tied to emotion in President Trump’s life.
Besides being a narcissist she is a lot more stupid than I thought. it’s also possible that with her age and health (weight) the stress is getting to her and she’s having trouble functioning.
No matter why she said it, she needs to be gone.
As an aside, I don’t know about alcoholism, but I have known alcoholics. They are trying to manage a lot of pain. President Trump is the opposite of a person in pain. He LOVES to work. Punishment to him would be not to work.
If you listen to Theo Von’s 2024 podcast, Trump admits that he has never tried alcohol or drugs because, ‘with my type of personality I might have liked them too much’.
So Trump had already put this talking point out there, and Wiles was simply referencing what it’s like working with such a strong-willed man who will initially approach any problem believing it can be solved. Quite scary hearing that, if you’re an opponent of Trump who can only think inside a conventional box. Or as Spock says of Khan, 2D thinking not 3.
As for why the DS resisted Wiles it was because they knew she’d be good at organising an admittedly chaotic individual, or one who thinks on so many levels that he appears to be so, and that the leaks that they relied on during 45’s term would dry up in 47’s. This release is probably designed to achieve this objective, which would cause massive disruption at a critical time.
The rest of her comments are what posters here have been saying about their suspicions about JD, same with Bondi. Vaughn is a zealot, so what, he needs to be, because he’s fighting zealots in the DS machine.
As for Mr Hubbard, I take it he’d frown on whistle blowers, then again, he lived in a different time, when a man’s word was his bond. Now it’s sensible to get any dirty laundry aired quickly, where it’s out in the open, under your control, can be swiftly washed and be ready for future use.
I agree.
Why didn’t you read the entire context, as now well explained, before you posted?
Maybe Susie is a functioning alcoholic? I think she will have to resign.
She’s already gone.
Planting a little seed along the way for the lefty readers anyway.
This changed my life 55 yrs ago.
If you work for a man, in heaven’s name work for him, speak well of him, and stand by the institution he represents. Remember, an ounce of loyalty is worth a pound of cleverness. If you must growl, condemn, and eternally find fault – resign your position, and when you are outside, damn to your heart’s content – but as long as you are part of the institution, do not condemn it. If you do, the first high wind that comes along will blow you away, and probably you will never know why.
Elbert Hubbard
The great – the one and only – Elbert Hubbard!
Glad to see him quoted!
He also said if you need to get something done, ask the busy man – although I have seen that attributed to Lucille Ball many years later, Elbert Hubbard said it way before.
For those unfamiliar with the name of Elbert Hubbard, he was one of the passengers on the Lusitania when it was sunk. As I recall, he started a place called The Roycrofters in upstate New York. They had a printing press and did beautiful special printings of various things.
My grandpa always said, “Give the hardest job to the laziest man and he’ll find the easiest way to do it.”
He didn’t invent the saying but he loved it.
My husband always says laziness is the mother of invention — for the same reason.
True, but not necessarily the BEST WAY!
This!👆
Wise words.
She did not taste hers before she spit them out, Monti.
Not the first time, nor all the way through to eleventh.
Agreed. For such a “smart” women, 11 interviews was not a slip up…it was purposeful.
So Wiles began her take down immediately upon being hired? 1 months ago?
I think a true MAGA revolution is needed. Destroy the uniparty republicans.
People have been strangely gunning for Bondi, Patel and Wiles since day one.
All the more reason to keep them all. They must be on to something.
They’re “on-to” the leftist way of thinking. Trump demands loyalty. I’d sh*t can them all.
These remarks are toxic to the White House, if one looks at the world stage where president Trump operates.
Plays into the latest story line of President Trump being mentally diminished and loosing his grip.
The US media will go the extra distance to also claim an alcohol problem … just like his father.
Now there is an insider making the claims.
Think on the other comments of major disagreements among the President’s staff on the tariff issue. The spin being …. a personal staff trying to argue with a president with no grip on reality.
We have a President who acts like an alcoholic … trying work with those clever evil Russians … we have a diminished President betraying the Ukrainians … name the topic.
This has potential to do major PR damage after the rest of the media world piles on and more reasons for the republican wing of the Uni-party to do nothing and worse.
This has major damage implications.
Also attacking the great Russ Vought, who has in my opinion been wrongly throttled back. Wiles doing?
If Vought is your idea of a black helicopter zealot…
Are you judging this only by VF soundbites? There was little harm done to Team Trump, and a lot more done to Vanity Fair .All is good.
Damage done to Vanity Fair? 😂 People are eating this up!
A few MAGA critics – who have never picked up a VF in their lives – doth not make damage.
This is a PR disaster for Team Trump.
Susie Wiles seems to have anger issues, going back.
So, let’s look at your words: toxic, mentally diminished, alcohol problem, un-named source, major disagreements, no grip on reality, alcoholic, diminished, pile on, major PR damage.
Each of your comments do a really good job parroting what the “media world” wants you to believe.
The context makes them understandable. Why are you rushing to judgement instead? That said, it was a dunderhead decisions to do these interviews.
Shall be interesting to learn what was behind this decision. May not be what it immediately appears to be. Discrediting Vanity Fair is a bonus outcome. Which puts the whole gratuitous RFKJr -Olivia Nussi attack in a new light too.
The CONTEXT does not make it understandable … nor excuse this rotten actor bad mouthing the President and his staff to the enemy.
Context means ZERO to the people and AI that will chop up the statements and broadcast or post them OUT OF CONTEXT.
As Carnac the Magnificent (Johnny Carson) used to say …. You have to have been living under a rock in a hermetically seals jar on Funk and Wagnel’s porch not to know what the media is going to do with the text of this interview.
President Trump Won!!!
Gracias Dios!
CUT THE CORD
If this series of interviews was released just before the mid-terms it might have made an impact, but the DS-politico-media complex as so desperate to throw anything they can at Trump that they couldn’t hold it in reserve. The Democratic Party, as we know it, is coming apart at the seams with the socialists and their institutional allies making a power bid against the old gerontocracy. Knowing this, the DS are having to constantly divert attention, try to wrestle the initiative away from Team Trump and pretend their political puppet is causing real damage to the MAGA movement.
This is why there has been a carefully coordinated online campaign targeting the MAGA base and trying to split it (evidence is plentiful here on CTH), this is why the Epstein ‘scandal’ and ‘Seditious Six’ campaign were launched, because they are desperate to launch a narrative that MAGA is crumbling under pressure from Democrats, and the inevitability of their victories in 2026.
The reality though is somewhat different, with any ‘successes’ being short term and largely coming from finite LawFare interventions and most of the scandals fizzling, or locking onto the firer’s own exhaust plume, instead of bring down the high-flying supersonic Trump.
I doubt that Trump was not informed about the nature of the interviews, and what some might call treasonous others might call plain talking truths, which after all is the way the 47 operates, as we’ve seen with his tweet on Reiner’s murder.
Why would she even give access to Vanity Fair? Can anyone here read? She said that Clinton was never on the island and that the president was wrong to say it. She’s defending Clinton. She said Trump was on the Epstein manifold, they were young playboys. She slammed Elon over and over on ketamine. Not one good word about Elon, not one. That is RINO/leftist rhetoric. She came from Bush, she’s a RINO tool, and Trump will excuse her because he refuses to know the enemy right in front of him. Remember his Mamdani oval office horror? He can slam a dead man but not the enemy right in front of him. That is not MAGA and it hurts all of us. It’s a very disturbing thing to watch.
Did you listen to the transcripts, or are only reacting to VF sound bites for salacious effect? This has already blown over when you read the full context.
File this one under BBC’s culpable creative editing too.
Hard to see how ‘taken out of context’ could get her off the hook. I never liked her. She’s deep state and has been her whole life. That’s why she agreed to be interviewed. She’s one of them.
Trump brushes off Wiles’ ‘alcoholic’s personality’ nick as allies torch Vanity Fair piece
Cabinet members and Trump himself have dismissed the unflattering quotes, claiming they were taken out of context
“No, she meant that I’m — you see, I don’t drink alcohol. So everybody knows that — but I’ve often said that if I did, I’d have a very good chance of being an alcoholic.
I have said that many times about myself, I do. It’s a very possessive personality,” Trump told the Post.
“I’ve said that many times about myself. I’m fortunate I’m not a drinker.
If I did, I could very well, because I’ve said that — what’s the word? Not possessive — possessive and addictive type personality,” Trump said. “Oh, I’ve said it many times, many times before.”
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-brushes-off-wiles-alcoholics-personality-nick-allies-torch-vanity-fair-piece
This guy is SO polished I need to not trust anything he says or does. He was created in the exact same way as Barack Obama. Name changes, a book deal, a senator for a day. “Barely qualified.”
I knew Trump’s previous VP was a piece of crap. (forever Pence of Crap!) I just didn’t know exactly HOW much of a piece of crap he was until his participation in Jan 6th came to be.
Vance is something darker and deeper and very meticulously created for THIS specific role. No one who is a “good guy” who need to be created in this way.
Giveaways
Vance : Oh ya, I believe in conspiracy theories .. but, only conspiracy theories that are true.Susie and I often joke about this.We get along.
He is protecting himself from Susie. Chickenshit nuances. Doublespeak – out only for himself.
He just proved he will defend the indefensible.
And he did it with smooth jokes. So not only does he tell us to ignore what we just heard, but to laugh with him about it. Living around him would made me dizzy.
I was actually a bit pleased to see the photo of him having an an angry face — he was apparently arguing with his wife. She was looking down and I didn’t feel good about that. But I was happy to see something got to him enough that he forgot to be Mr. Smooth.
Saying I believe in conspiracy theories when all the time the fights had all along been over”conspiracy theories about ‘stolen election’ being that Biden won, and that PDJT calling the election was stolen was just that – conspiracy theory. Going further, saying “(but) only conspiracy theories which are true. So there you go. What is he saying and not saying – not citing the stolen election example – which is true JD Vance?
Wiles does not need his protection or approval. He is protecting himself since he is shooting to be the presidential candidate, come 2028.Supposing he thinks and likely have TPUSA stumping for him big time. After all, there was this big public image creation splash with his wife after Charlie Kirk was asassinated. What was implied behind closed doors?. No one knows. Except, his popularity has plummeted over the last few months when he is juxtaposed against Don T, Jr. The media at large just did not report on the popularity rise and fall of the 2.
We would want Wiles to be on our side, don’t we, Vance?
JD is very smart.
He said, ‘we joked about it in ‘private’.” She said it to Vanity Fair.
What possible benefit could giving that kind of ammunition to a visciously hostile publication have for this administration?
Maybe the bigger picture is that it reveals what a snake in the grass PDT has right next to him. Wasn’t Wiles the one who pushed next to worthless Barbie Biondi to PDT? As far as Vance, hard no for me. Way too much fake created everything with him.
It’s a benefit to someone, but not the administration.
Remember during the first term the press painted the administration as disorganized, chaotic, Trump is a hot mess? Well this could be the beginning of version 2.0 of that narrative.
If she did it intentionally to create a negative narrative about the administration she needs to be fired; and, if she is too stupid to think this couldn’t happen (which I doubt) she needs to be fired for incompetence.
Either way it’s an easy decision for PDJT, the end result is the same, Susie is gone.
Undermine Trump when he goes AWOL on Ukraine.
Will PDJT address these 2 in his mystery announcement at 9 PM?
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115730644486071082
Vanity Fair Chris Whipple from Vanity Fair – The outlet published an article on Tuesday entitled “Susie Wiles, JD Vance, and the ‘Junkyard Dogs’: The White House Chief of Staff On Trump’s Second Term (Part 1 of 2)”- with quotes categorizing Vice President JD Vance as a “conspiracy theorist,” claiming Trump’s personality was that of an alcoholic, and labeling Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought a “zealot.”
Wiles did not deny any of the quotes.
Also, DeSantis last week revealed his own “Citizen Bill of Rights for Artificial Intelligence,” and claims Florida has the right to regulate AI rules, despite PDJT’s executive order.
Dear Susie is NOT our friend
If I was Trump I’d have three words… You are fired. Oh maybe a few more… Take Pam with you!
Maybe Vance’s billionaire tech bros, who want Wiles to stay where she is, gave their pal a jingle to tell him what to say in response to a softball question?
That looked like an underhanded pitch to a major league home run hitter.
Not that Vance isn’t quick on his feet, but geez…
DON JR, LEAVITT, GABBARD, DAVIS, etc are all defending Wiles. Not just Vance.
They are standing with PDJT’s position. Right now, the performers of the Trump administration need to do their work without more targeting than they already have been and are still under attack. Susie Wiles obviously does not have to do any hit job herself. Vanity deal did it for her. She’ll be shown the door at the right time. Does D Vance think he’ll have Wiles and Bondi when he becomes president? What a joke
Gabbard?
It sounds to me like she is projecting onto President Trump her issues with her father – that’s how squeamish this is.
Suspicious Cat – ya got one of those bags they give you on the plane?
true believers until they get a taste of corruption
She doesn’t know how the #ProfessionalLiars work? Of course she does. She’s been around town since Pres. Reagan.
This feels intentional. Splitter strategy for MAGA and enemy ammo for the mid-terms. She even shivs her disciple Bondi. Providing cover?
Q: Who steered PDT to Butler?
It’s a simple question.
There’s a lot of distrust of JD Vance here… yeah, I get it… sponsored by a tech billionaire and Senator for a short time when he was chosen for VP. But he’s a better VP pick than any AG pick Trump has made.
JD Vance took the question and he handled it well.
The created Kenyan is the same way.
Susie Wiles is not very smart giving interviews to writers who HATE Donald Trump. They are NEVER going to be fair. Why would you hand sharp daggers to your enemies?
Why is a 68 year old grandmother President’s chief of staff? I don’t understand this. No more females in super important positions.
PDT needs a middle-aged, burly Homan type guy who would never, ever give an interview to that rag Vanity Fair.
Agree 1000%.
Why doesn;t POTUS have Dan Scarvino as his COS he has been very loyal
to POTUS since his first term thru all the Jan 6 stuff stayed with him after that
She looks older than 68. I had all along thought she is older.
Enemies? Friends?
Potāto, potäto…?
It’s not about her not being smart. It is intentional. She does not have to do the work herself.
Palantir says Howdy.
“What exactly did Susie Wiles expect was going to happen with all those recorded interviews?”
While I am not a mind reader, I would venture to say what happened is just exactly what she expected if she is as savvy as she is purported to be. That or she is a very stupid person to trust a leftist rag to not use her words out of context.
While she may have been good for President on the campaign trail, she has the stench of Uniparty upon her.
I see this as Vance taking the high road, trying to make the best of this bad situation that he can right then and there.
But what Susie Wiles did, she should be fired for that- absolutely, and asap.
If that woman had the nuts to do this, what else is she doing, has she done or what more will she do?
She is not trustworthy AT ALL.
This is incredibly disloyal, it’s UnAmerican, this is the President !!
She smeared the President.
That is not okay.
Firing her now would make a great big stink. Imagine the followup article VF would do. Just know who she is and deal accordingly
I would say, “have at it” and “thank you very much for helping to bring out what a rat she is, indeed!”
I hope PDJT can sense the moles digging the ground out from underneath him.
Time for PDJT to rid himself of his Praetorian Guard.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Praetorian_Guard
Susie expected what happened to happen. Period. DC is as DC does. Trusting a lifelong DC insider is not smart. Sometimes, I don’t understand Our President and his choices. First time shame on them. Second time shame on him. We must pack some serious integrity and spine.
The “money quote”, come to your own conclusions:
She was gossiping with a far left rag.. it’s shocking that she’s been doing this.
In truth, based upon who and what the wench actually is, it would be way more shocking if she didn’t.
It was completely amateurish.
Has her position gone to her head? Every time PDJT refers to her as “the most powerful woman in the room”, I cringe.
Maybe the goal was to take down Vanity Fair, who has been taking a lot of forced error hits of late – RFKJr and the whole Olivia Nussi trash. Bellicose Canto.
I thought Wiles was Blondi Bondi’s patron saint and protector. I don’t understand why she threw Blondi under the bus. Maybe the tapes could shed light on Wiles’ context but never the less she should have never have done the interviews. I can think of no productive or MAGA reason for doing those interviews. She must have meant harm. I can’t wrap my mind around the “why”.
JD.
Sit down.
Nobody thinks you’re a conspiracy theorist.
A conspiracy participant, sure, but, you aren’t being mistaken for a conspiracy theorist.
Remember that night not too long ago when you were on a stage so mushed up against Erika Kirk that there was no room for the Holy Ghost?
The night you virtue signaled by publicly, passive-aggressively slamming your own wife for not being Christian?
Those were terrible things to do and those things define you.
Trying to liken yourself to conspiracy theorists isn’t going to fly with conservatives.
You already messed up beyond redemption.
Go sell used cars or something.
Bleh.
0.o
^forgot my googly eyes!
LOL
0.o
“The night you virtue signaled by publicly, passive-aggressively slamming your own wife for not being Christian?”
I did not know about that – that is really sick and wrong of him to do that to Usha – he himself was at the wedding with that red dot on his forehead, participating in their wedding vows with respect to her religion – I mean, if they had one of those weddings with two ceremonies respecting both religions, then he is a bum to pull that on her – and she had three beautiful little children with him while maintaining a legal career!
Yes, Miss SueJeanne, he did do that.
It was when TPUSA had that rally at Ole Miss.
JD panders to whatever crowd he’s in front of and that night it was a very large crowd of Christians.
He could have just answered the question by saying that he and his wife didn’t have any issues with regard to their not sharing the same religion and that it caused no issues with regard to how they were raising their children and that it was very personal and that was all he felt comfortable sharing about it.
He sounded defensive and embarrassed.
Anyway, it didn’t sit well with me at all.
If you get a chance to listen to it, I’d be interested in reading your thoughts on it.
0.o
This interview has as much credibility as BBC’s creative editing of Trump’s Jan 6 speech.
Hope there are ground to sue VF good and hard as well.
Expect Susie to sue? What and why was she doing 11 interviews in the first place?
Haven’t read every comment here but the situation begs another question to “What was Suzie thinking doing 11 interviews with VF?”……Am I to believe POTUS wasn’t aware that she was doing this??
Something Feels Very Off About the Trump Team’s Rapid Defense of Susie Wiles
https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/something-feels-very-off-about-the
Unbelievable the responses of the Trump administration like Kennedy, Zeldin, Gabbard…..they are praising Wiles like she is the second coming. Sickening and disturbing
Best way to minimize the damage. I don’t think PT will fire Wiles, but I will be expecting her to shift positions.
Well, we do not know what if anything, was said behind closed doors.
He may have read her her rights…
Yes, it was truly weird and somewhat nauseating.
Propaganda 101 – the bandwagon, you need to jump on or there must be something wrong with you! Everyone else thinks that Susie Wiles is absolutely wonderful, etc. etc. etc., no one thinks badly of her here so what’s your problem?
She’s not stupid. She knew exactly what the hell she was doing. Damn, will this crap ever end?
My opinion is the leftists masquerading as journalists used flattery to draw the mark in, made her feel like she was the most important person in the world, and kept her talking. Eventually her ego surfaced and she started talking down on other people.
Susie and JD are fracturing the base.
Looks like death by a thousand cuts is the game plan.
Don’t fall for it.
That’s the most important point.
Well said.
Do not fracture the base.
Sundance, has been hammering this point exactly, for weeks and not to fall for it.
Susie and JD are fracturing the base.
Looks like death by a thousand cuts is the game plan.
Don’t fall for it.
Suzie and JD do not have the power nor the clout, and certainly do not have the following to fracture the MAGA/America First base.
The more either of them throw themselves out there either overtly or surreptitiously just makes them more obviously against President Trump and our country.
Weasels are going to weasel.
0.o
PDJT needs to schedule another rally, a real rally…
I said it on the Presidential Thread, and will repeat it here…
Vance was deflecting from the subject in order to not undercut his boss. I thought he was being “lighthearted” in his remarks in “defending” Wiles, who is still the Chief of Staff, unless, and until, DJT removes her from that position.
If he had come out and said, “I have no idea what the H*ll she was thinking and I hope that she is fired before the week is out!” then he would have been declaring open warfare on her, which would make his life miserable, and his job much more difficult, if the President decides to keep her in the job! (Which, for the record, I hope he does NOT! My vote is for Ric Grennell or maybe Steven Miller but I have never liked, nor trusted, Susie Wiles and this whole episode confirms everything Sundance said about her being a snake in grass…and her little dog, Blondi, too!)
Vance didn’t help himself.
Hed have done better to shut upl
One of this great President’s greatest strengths is his ability to negotiate and he has done an amazing job in so many areas.
But in the area of saving the country, he needed to be a stone cold assassin and not a negotiator.
He needed to be ruthless and cut the head off the snake and then work his way down. I think he feels he could do it through discussions and hired people that others told him to.
Maybe he is too nice or too trustworthy, but whatever it is, it’s coming back to haunt him. He should use his address to th nation to expose all he knows and burn it down. it’s now or never already.
At least she was talking
Wiles’ backstabbing comments only reinforce my low opinion of her. Vance’s reaction is predictable, trying to present the administration as a cohesive team. But anyone can see that Wiles is not on Team MAGA. Maybe she’s still useful to Trump, maybe not. I don’t know. I’m tired of all the greedy little monkeys trying to subvert and destroy everything for profit. I say fire her fat ass and find somebody more like Rubio or Miller.
Susie Wiles isn’t a crackhead, but she acts like a crackhead around the mainstream media.
Susie Wiles isn’t a crackhead, but she acts like a crackhead around the mainstream media.
She may not be a crackhead in the real sense of the term, but something might be causing a crackhead-type personality disorder.
Maybe she’s on some sort of medication that skews her judgement or is causing lapses in judgement?
Maybe she’s having a negative reaction to some sort of medication that makes her an even bigger @$$hole than usual?
We could speculate for days.
Crack isn’t one of those drugs that older white ladies typically get into, but pill-form amphetamines are abused across the board by younger and older people regardless of race.
She could just be getting kind of senile on account of her age.
That sort of thing has a tendency to sneak up on someone out of the blue.
It would probably be a good idea for President Trump to have Suzie get a thorough physical to make sure she’s not mentally ill or having issues with any medication she may be taking.
0.o
Agree with you. Her weight/diet is an issue for someone her age. She may have cracked under the combination of her health and the stress of the job.
She also may have believed she is part of the “in crowd” and VF wouldn’t print anything that hurt her. By now she probably figured out the in crowd doesn’t accept her as a member.
Whatever her issues, I don’t care and have zero sympathy. Whatever her problems, she needs to resign. She needs to be gone. The only good thing she could do now is resign.
Vance is definitely Presidential material.
None of your jokes are ever funny.
0.o
https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/something-feels-very-off-about-the
From the above article;
“Attorney Tom Renz has been investigating Susie Wiles for some time, and his findings have led him to conclude that she is bad news. After JD Vance brushed off Susie Wiles calling him a “conspiracy theorist,” Renz wrote:
She’s saying PDJT is impulsive and given to emotional volatility.
Bottom line is that as the President’s Chief-of-Staff she should have shifted the conversation ot admin wins, plans, etc.
Commenting on the boss to mass media as she did is stupid beyond belief. Or, as SD is really hinting, intentional.
This is unbelievable, really. If she didn’t have the common sense, why didn’t someone else say something to stop it? Why did PTrump allow his CoS to do the interviews? It’s all so bewildering.
Wiles is wily. Maybe she’s setting them up for a lawsuit? The media is predictable gullible.
I’ve always need curious how lies travel, their lowest paths of least resistance. How many gullible reporters will spread this?
Being called a conspiracy theorist has become shorthand for “Well, they’re right again, and we hate them for it. So let’s sling some poop until the day we can no longer sustain the lie for the Government Party.”
People sound like ridiculous idiots using that intended epithet.
Unless he fires her, it’s my opinion that President Trump approved of her giving interviews to VF, before and since publication.
This is a snake. Her playing innocent is so obvious. Look at her thin pursed lips – she is a mean girl!
Eleven interviews? For VANITY FAIR?? Huh.
Someone said this on X and I believe it: “Susie Wiles is a supremely smart woman who does nothing by accident. She did this calculatingly. The only question remains is to what end”.
It was reported that President Trump’s son (unspcified) is defending her.
Which son?
I still don’t trust her! I don’t understand why she was ever hired.