I had not been paying close attention to the overarching issues of President Trump removing Fed Governor Lisa Cook for cause – fraudulent filings on her three mortgage applications. However, the appearance of Norm Eisen as her lawyer certainly highlights the political nature of the defense effort.
Norm Eisen is a well-known Lawfare operative, second only to Mary McCord in his high visibility and connections to all of the anti-Trump efforts. Eisen, like McCord, is at the center of the leftist effort to stop the Trump agenda through the manipulation of the courts, ie. ‘Lawfare.’
Norm Eisen left, Abbe Lowell right. Both lawyers for Lisa Cook
WASHINGTON – A federal judge likely will not rule until next week on whether Lisa Cook, a member of the Federal Reserve board, can remain in her job despite President Donald Trump’s attempt to fire her.
At the first hearing on Cook’s lawsuit against Trump, U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb grappled with the legal issues raised by Trump’s unprecedented move against Cook but offered few hints about how she might rule. The judge, an appointee of Joe Biden, acknowledged the limits of the courts’ power to question the president’s motives, while expressing concerns about the lack of due process afforded to Cook. (more)
While the lawyers defending Ms. Cook dance around the central issue, there is no doubt Ms. Cook lied on three mortgage applications, claiming primary residency in both Illinois and Georgia within a week.
Norm Eisen appears in the footage below, but no one seems to notice him or identify him by name.
.
CNN now agrees about Lisa Cook! pic.twitter.com/LcIDnlpvZB
— Pulte (@pulte) August 30, 2025
The 3rd mortgage
represented to the bank as a “Second Home”
that is actually an Investment/Rental Property https://t.co/6K7r4mgmjB
— Pulte (@pulte) August 30, 2025
Wow. The Washington Post 👇 pic.twitter.com/Vh79cG951q
— Pulte (@pulte) August 30, 2025
Yank his security clearance and ban from US govt buildings. Fixed.
and the fraudster
Abbe Lowell certainly seems to be getting around a lot these days too.
They aren’t sending in the heavyweights in on this one for no reason. She knows stuff…
Every time I see his name, I think of the movie Young Frankenstein’s “Abbe Normal” aka Abnormal mixup in the laboratory
Not a legal expert, but I cannot see this case going anywhere. So far Cook and her attorneys have been making a lot of noise, but the evidence appears to be stacking up and none of them, nor Powell, want this case to go to the SC where they might just rule that President Trump can fire her and anyone else in these so-called “independent” agencies that are performing Article 2 executive functions. I predict that after a while longer of making noise either she will resign because of the evidence or Powell will take it on himself to fire her.
Attention Pam Bondi:
18 U.S.C. § 1014 – Mortgage Fraud: This law specifically addresses mortgage fraud, which occurs when someone provides false information on a loan application to obtain a mortgage or prevent foreclosure. Violations can lead to severe penalties, including imprisonment and fines.
Wire Fraud and Mail Fraud: If the fraudulent activities involve the use of electronic communications or the postal service, charges may also be brought under wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343) or mail fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1341). Both offenses carry similar penalties to bank fraud and can be applied in cases where fraudulent loan applications are submitted electronically or through the mail.
Yes, understand. But the post by SD is about her civil challenge to Trump’s authority to fire her, not the criminal case that DOJ should pursue. Another commenter suggests she might resign and withdraw her civil case in return for a plea deal or reduction or something in the criminal case, whenever that is filed, if it is ever filed.
They go hand in hand; the crimes, give Trump cause to fire. Hand in hand.
I say, just arrest and charge her with fraud. Then don’t take a plea, take her to court, and let the jury of those who would’ve of been charged day one deal with her punishment. Send her to jail for 20 years, for the, what we know so far, three fraudulent loans.
You have more faith than I she would ever be convicted by a jury of her peers.
They should be investigating the jury pool in DC. According to a suggestion from Mike Davis.
If Cook gets indicted and placed under arrest, presumably she would not be able to vote on Fed business.
That’s not as good as removal and filling her seat with a new Trump appointee. But one less Biden vote will help tilt the balance. There are only 7 Governors on the Fed. One vote makes a difference.
It’s called ….. P*R*E*S*S*U*R*E ….. and not mention …. TIME TO START SPENDING BIG MONEY!
I thought I read here that if the banks didn’t lose money it couldn’t be fraud?
The interest rates on mortgages are higher if the home is not a primary residence, or if it is going to be a rental property. So, the banks DID lose money: all the money from the higher interest rates they were entitled to get but didn’t get becasue she lied in the applications.
Not to mention loss of property tax if she’s taken any kind of homestead exemptions.
IRS rental income?
By claiming primary residence, the banks are losing money on the lower interest rate and lower fees. The banks also were misled as to the risk associated with the loan. The risk that is becoming more dangerous now.
Tell that to letitia james.
Do better Scott, we see what you’re trying to do. Do better. We deserve better trolls. C’mon man, effort. Some darn effort goes a long way.
Trolls write what they’re told to write. They don’t have enough intelligence to come up with these garage comments on their own.
That didn’t matter when Trump was in the docks for a half-billion dollar bogus mortgage fraud case. Goose meet gander.
Wow.
Oh you are being so cute LOL!
By making that comparison, Scott, it is apparent to everyone here that you know nothing about real estate or mortgages.
“none of them, nor Powell, want this case to go to the SC where they might just rule that President Trump can fire her and anyone else in these so-called “independent” agencies”
i think you misunderstand the purpose of lawfare. for all intents its already been to SC several times with the correct ruling. the “law” or “precedent” has very little to do with it.
The law doesn’t matter here. She’s the first Black woman on the Fed, the case is in a D.C. court (naturally), the judge her are sorority house sisters, and Trump will be hammered as a racist, as will any court, if her firing is upheld.
And yes, that includes the S.C.
When you run a red light and the camera catches you, it is hard to beat the rap.
Jerome Powell is worried that Lisa Cook will expose
the unlawful or illicit activity at the Federal Reserve
to get a Plea Deal for reduced charges.
Plausible, given that Powell has been busting budgets on the Taj Mahal.
That’d be nice!
Wonder if Chief Justice Roberts is whispering in Eisen’s ear…..
Maybe over at Norm’s palatial mansion (120 rooms) in the Czech Republic.
does Czech Republic have extradition to U.S.?
…..and who is whispering in Lack-of Justice Roberts’ ear….
do he have a pillows handy ????
Bonk your head a few more times, Norm. What a colossal waste of time and money.
Maybe a few dozen bonks to his head Eisen will get a man’s voice instead of that annoying whining ,girlie voice of his. It’s worse than nails on a chalkboard.
‘chalkboard’ ?
What happened to the old blackboards?
Next thing I won’t be allowed to pick blackberries.
again, IMo this misunderstands the primary purpose of lawfare.
it is absolutely NOT a waste of time and money, as long as it can go on screeching throughout media and gum up a functioning republic for a few months.
Don’t worry the taxpayers are funding Norm Eisen’s fees
This way, when Eisen’s own indictments come down, he will howl “Retribution!”
To no avail.
No one can hear your screams, Norm..
I’d bet he’d rather face the music here than be turned over to throngs of frothy mouth Eastern European Patriots after he jammed up several Righteous Elections of Common Sense Nationalists..
At this point, the merits no longer matter. She is a symbol to be exploited for The Cause.
And when she loses they’ll just dig up another such.
Last time I got fired from a job (50 years or more ago) I don’t recall that I needed or had a right to “due process”. If the boss doesn’t want you, that’s it. Sayonara muchacho
You always have/ had the right to due process if you believed and or had evidence that the termination was unjustified or illegal under U.S. Code.
Historically, most people of average means who were/are faced with that situation are often deterred from pursuing their rights due to the cost of legal representation (lawyers). And, unlike the plots of some movies, most pro bono lawyers who operate in lower economic class areas are not the most skilled or who have unlimited resources to investigate the offending employer.
So we make decisions based on practicality- can we afford to fight the unethical employer or do we move on to another job.
As with real sexharrasment cases, we decide based on legal fees & the stigma of having filed & won such a case, what is the likelihood that someone will hire you afterward?
Although I personally once faced a question of bias within my company, I chose to not pursue it because I enjoyed my job and the position for which I was not chosen but given to a minority female turned out quickly to have been misrepresented by the hiring manager.
But the latter issue you raise is sort of self-solving. If an employer won’t hire you because you won some kind of discrimination case with a previous employer, then, as long as you don’t have a conspicuous *history* of filing discrimination cases against a series of employers, the prospective employer should have no issue with you if you’re qualifications are good. If they DO have an issue, then you would be more correct to turn THEM down, and move on to to another prospective employer who will respect your decision to seek relief against the previous unethical employer.
This is of course speculation and in an extremely tight job market, I’m sure that the dearth of available jobs will come very heavily into play with one’s decision making.
Isn’t it funny that she has the money for lawyers. TWO of them. And THREE houses. Where is she getting all this money from?
“Where is she getting all this money from?”
Well……………….
“As of 2025, Lisa Cook’s net worth is estimated to be between $1.1 million and $2.7 million. Her salary as a Federal Reserve governor is approximately $190,000 annually. This wealth is derived from her academic career, research grants, and her current role in academia and government.”
Ref. https://houseandwhips.com/lisa-cook-net-worth-2025/#google_vignette
NOTE: This article is a fairly blatantly fawning piece, obviously written to subjectively characterize Ms. Cook in the most positive light possible. This despite the serious charges against her which, so far, appear to be backed up by significant evidence of deliberate deception on her part.
Who knows what other possible frauds (if any) this woman may have perpetrated to gain wealth? The article does say that the discovery of the current mortgage problems has prompted investigation into her history of mortgages and property transactions.
Personally enriched through research grants? Hmmm…
Anything is possible with these “elite” parasites…..
Look through her Wikipedia bio. What, precisely did she do between roughly
2016- 2019? Seems like some holes in her resume.
Was she a fixer?
I’d bet Blondi is hot on the trail. President Trump wants as much hard evidence as possible against this fraudulent femme fatale.
I believe Julie Kelly is wondering if there possibly may be some Covid-19 loan fraud involved. Palantir, do your thing!
Having been self-employed for 40+ years, I find it confounding that people think they have a right to money from someone else.
Yep, and that is the way it ought to be. If you don’t like your employer, or believe that you have greater value than you are being paid for, that is swell. Just go open your own business and hire employees and run it as you see fit.
In my career, I spent 4+ years as an employee, then opened my own practice and ran it for 40 years. I have nothing but the highest regard for my two employers, who gave me a job and mentored me.
Cool.japanese and Spanish.
Spanese?
Yea.
Well, they routinely defend things like rampant crime, illegal immigration, abortion, treason, sedition, graft, fraud, human trafficking, child mutilation, violations of civil rights and abuse of authority, so I guess we can’t be too surprised they’d use the lowest known legal life forms out there to defend this obvious criminal perpetrator.
There’s no bottom to their snake pit.
The bottom is certainly very far away.
I suspect it comes out at the other end of the Earth somewhere in or near Communist China.
Twin snake pits.
It begs the wrath of God.
AMEN!!!
No there certainly is not…
The assigned judge, Jia Cobb, by the strangest coincidence, just happens to be one of C(r)ook’s sorority sisters.
What do we all believe the chances are of that?
Conflict?
Nah……
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/08/conflict-interest-exposed-corrupt-judge-jia-cobb-who/
Isn’t it amazing how that works?
If they know anything, it’s how to judge shop. And they clearly didn’t need to look very long or hard for this one.
Inbred vipers.
There’s you…being circumspect and polite 😎
lol
😉
More polite than I feel or would have been!
I am so sick of the banana republic corruption…coming very close to forgetting I am a female of a certain age who was born in the South and all that means.
Or used to once upon a time…
Southern Belle’s appear to be, Gone With The Wind…
WOOSH!!!!!
Highly insensitive. Hahahahaha…
Yeah, I saw that article! SPIT!!!
Isn’t that a conflict of interest..As if that mattered.
Completely….She knew and didn’t disclose or recuse, sis.
Heck, they BOTH knew.
Well, well, well just look who else just happens to be a member (honorary) of Delta Sigma Theta sorority.
https://thegrio.com/2023/07/21/delta-sigma-theta-sorority-inc-welcomes-justice-ketanji-brown-jackson-and-more-to-its-sisterhood/
… and of course https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2023/07/20/remarks-by-vice-president-harris-at-the-delta-sigma-theta-sorority-inc-national-convention/
CNBC idiot is trying to explain the matter away. What a joke. She’s a financial wizard, being on the fed board and knew what she did was wrong. If she didn’t then she’s too dumb to control interest rates. She’s claiming Im incompetent by making an obvious mistake. Either way see you later you crook Lisa, even if you’re claiming it is a mistake! The Judge is just as stupid if she rules in her favor. Time to end the Fed and all judges that fail to see the truth that any layman knows. You can’t have 2 places as your year round residences even if you spend 6 months at each! State law prevents that!
But we’re entitled!
the articles about this imply she may have filed Homestead Exemption on both houses (lowers state property taxes because it is your “homestead”) No can do legally. So MI and GA may have something to say also.
I owned 2 homes ( ky ga) I could only claim one as residence….
Give her a break. Ann Arbor property taxes are very high. They’re double the surrounding areas.
Where is the money to fund this operation coming from??? Surely, she can’t afford those two dirtbags.
When, through her, the target is Pres. Trump, the money bags & gratis services come rolling in. They’re not “with” her because they like her.
She’s the most accomplished? She used her knowledge of the financial system to, game the system. No ethical guardrails. She’s toast.
I hope!
Agree. Most likely this is just negotiating the terms of her departure. They want to make sure she keeps her mouth shut.
If convicted, she might talk for a reduced sentence.
Oops you forgot the sarc tag!
Birds of a feather…
Where’s all the money coming from for her to buy all these properties?
Blacks are given extra points on the ASVAB and civil service examinations for hiring consideration. Leftist judges give points for being black when caught up in subsequent crimes.
She’s probably making $200 to $225,000 in this appointment. You only need 10% down to get a loan, maybe less.
Both men’s personal appearance says “defeated”.
Trump has been laying the ground work for some time now to prove to Americans the the Fed is corrupt and cannot be trusted. This is one in a series of things he is doing with the goal in mind to help Americans see that the Fed is a private and totally opaque to Americans organization that makes money essentially by insider trading and in controlling the money supply of the United States, basically can set the cost of. money at virtually anything it wants. if the Fed wants to collapse the economy, it can do so. The Fed has created both booms and busts and since its establishment in 1913 it has singlehandedly reduced the value of one dollar by 98%.
Lisa Cook was a Biden appointee who appears, based upon the mortgage documents, to be as crooked as the day is long. I’m sure she will have her day in court eventually. This is not a minor crime that she allegedly committed, this crime usually brings a long prison sentence and also can require the defendant to pay restitution to those harmed by this fraud.
Interesting point. If true, which seems very plausible, it was a brilliant chess move.
I agree with your assessment. This probably would’ve worked pre-Obama too but so much damage by the Obama/Biden administrations have already occurred that I question whether it’s possible to pull this country out of its tailspin. The Trump administration is doing its best, and doing an excellent job, but recent administrations have quite possibly produced too much damage to reverse. I hope I’m wrong about that.
I’m not sure “corrupt” quite encompasses it….
The fed is already collapsing the housing industry with the high interest rates.
Who is paying these clowns? I’m quite positive cook can’t afford these maggots.
Dexter, that’s an insult to maggots, who have a legitmate purpose in God’s creation, after all!
There are two issues here. The one that is specific to Cook, i.e., is lying on three mortgage applications sufficient malfeasance to meet the “for cause” requirement? (Yes. If she can’t handle her own finances, she shouldn’t be handling the nation’s.)
The broader constitutional issue is whether there can be an “independent” unit within the federal government that is not really part of the legislative, executive or judicial branch of government.
The issue first came up in a case you will probably be hearing a lot about in the coming SCOTUS term. Humphrey’s Executor.
Humphrey was appointed to the Federal Trade Commission by Herbert Hoover. FDR fired him. Humphrey sued, but died as the case went on; the executor of his estate replaced him as plaintiff, as he was asking for back pay, which would be an asset of the estate. The issue was whether the FTC enabling statute, which limited firings only to “for cause,” was constitutional.
SCOTUS ruled in 1935 (9-0) that Congress could create a “quasi-independent agency.” It ruled:
This construction of the Act is confirmed by a consideration of the character of the Commission — an independent, nonpartisan body of experts, charged with duties neither political nor executive, but predominantly quasi-judicial and quasi-legislative, and by the legislative history of the Act.
When Congress provides for the appointment of officers whose functions, like those of the Federal Trade Commissioners, are of Legislative and judicial quality, rather than executive, and limits the grounds upon which they may be removed from office, the President has no constitutional power to remove them for reasons other than those so specified.
Given the recent SCOTUS opinion in US v. Trump, which clearly said that the president was head of the executive branch, and everyone in it worked under him, you can see that SCOTUS may have to re-visit Humphrey, maybe even this term.
SCOTUS already ruled that the president could remove the head of Elizabeth Warren’s creation, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, even though it enabling statute had similar “can’t be removed except for cause” language as to its head. Seila Law LLC v. CFPB (2020). That was a 5-4 decision. RBG was still on the Court. (Yes, who knows how ACB would vote.)
The Seila plaintiffs had argued that the whole agency was unconstitutional, but SCOTUS wasn’t going that far. It did find the restrictions on the president’s power to fire the head unconstitutional. The majority in Seila ruled:
Such an agency lacks a foundation in historical practice and clashes with constitutional structure by concentrating power in a unilateral actor insulated from presidential control.
Yes, the Fed would be the ultimate test of Humphrey. I’d expect a case involving another agency challenging Humphrey‘s precedent will make it to SCOTUS first. Until Humphrey is overturned, the lower courts are bound by it, but they have been distinguishing their fact situations from Humphrey’s.
Last term it was Chevron, Chevron, Chevron (overturned by Loper-Bright). This term it will be Humphrey, Humphrey, Humphrey.
This is issue is already coming up through the federal appellate courts. The Fifth Circuit just ruled that the restriction on “for cause” firing in the NLRB enabling act was unconstitutional. Space X v. NLRB (2025). I expect the NLRB will petition for cert. And yes, that is the Space X (Elon’s company).
Thank you, Wethal!! A very nice and informative summation of the issue.
Praise GOD!! Fight! Fight! Fight!
Not so random (?) thought … since one of the properties is reported to be held as a ‘rental’, she ought also be investigated for insurance fraud. Primary residence in a home has one insurance rate / policy; as a rental, a higher rate and specialized policy. If she’d cheat on the mortgage, she’d surely cheat on the insurance.
And, if possible, check her tax filings to see if she properly claimed rental income on any of the three properties that (I believe I saw) have tenants in them.
Ah interesting article at The Gateway Pundit about this Mrs Cook being before a so called nudge who is/was her buddy in some masonic thing.
Sorority sistas
For cause doesn’t afford due process, it’s not a criminal case.
Yet.
Not surprised to see Norm…he’s been a constant figure to rear ugly head throughout so many treasonous conspiracies we know of. He had a complete meltdown 4 days ago on MSNBC over Cook situation, which included his best Pelosi impersonation – advising Cook to rip up President Trump’s letter.
Creepy LOSERS – All of them!
Meltdown begins around 2:50 mark of video.
He’s got a look of Rumpelstiltskin about him and talks like he’s been inhaling helium!
Ole Norm is heading for a fall along with Mary, Mary quite contrary – who’s ready for this? 🍿
You are getting my hopes up.
I wonder how much she knows that they have to send in the heavyweight Lawfare guy to represent her?
She is a puppet for them and yet, they are fighting to keep her at the Fed. Is this to drag this out so that no one wonders why Powell lets her show up to work despite being fired?
I really don’t understand why they are protecting her.
Let’s remember, these are the folks that tried to kick Trump off the ballot in Colorado and Maine, for insurrection, despite him never even being convicted of that charge.
What was their mantra?
Something about “no one is above the law “ ??
Two Deluxe Schmucks. Sure be a shame if…
At least we know Eisen is In Country.. too bad Blondi’s document laden desk won’t be in the process of being craned into a window directly over head of Norm on his walk to the Courthouse..
Ha… so someone who required Senate confirmation is just an ordinary employee?
“Cobb said it’s well established that elected officials are not legally entitled to due process before being stripped of their posts, while government employees clearly have such rights.”
“This doesn’t seem to fit neatly in either category,” the judge said. “I guess if I had to say what it’s closer to, I would put it closer to an employee than an elected official.”
Lisa Crook not only willfully committed Mortgage Fraud, she also willfully committed Tax Fraud…..Your property taxes are much lower on primary residences….I would think once it’s proved in Court there’s mortgage fraud then clearly you go after Lisa Crook for tax fraud……
Yes, Lisa has opened herself a nice can of worms.
In California, a property tax homeowner’s exemption is available for a person’s principal residence.
How many such exemptions did Lisa claim?
Couple property tax fraud with possible income tax fraud if she claimed deductions/depreciation on Schedule E–Supplemental Income and Losses, for her three “principal” residences.
Yes, Lisa has opened herself a nice can of worms.
In California, a property tax homeowner’s exemption is available for a person’s principal residence.
How many such exemptions in how many different states did Lisa claim?
Couple this with possible income tax fraud if she claimed deductions/depreciation on Schedule E–Supplemental Income and Losses, for her three “principal” residences. Lisa may end up wishing she had just gone quietly into the night and cut a deal to avoid prosecution.
Back in the late 1990’s, Robert S. Mueller III (yes, the dementia patient who has been in memory care for the past few years, just after serving as “Special (Ed) Counsel to persecute President Trump on the Russia Collusion Hoax) was the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of California, based in San Francisco.
Cases of mortgage fraud like Cook’s were often settled out of court by requiring the borrower to pay lump-sum fine, say 3-5% of the principal loan balance, and then a requirement that the loan be refinanced or the property sold. It was a one-time offer. Take it or leave it. If you left it, you would get prosecuted.
Cook may regret having the lawfare shysters brought in. She has brought the spotlight onto herself, and the tens of millions of Americans who have lawful mortgages will be loath to give Cook much sympathy for her scamming of the system.
If Al Capone had of had Lawfare he would never done time…
Allegedly he (Al Capone) did mentor Saul Alinsky in the Back Of The Yards in turn of the Century Chicago.. Alinsky may be the human father of Lawfare.. kinda weird..
it didn’t work out for Al, but he did help create a weaponized form of our current Just-us System allowing criminality to flourish nearly 100 some odd years later! What a trip. Thanks, BD!
Wow. Just wow. Remember the scuttlebutt that Hillary’s dad took over running
Capone’s operation when he was in stir? If that’s on the up and up, no wonder
Hillary was all into every and all things Alinsky.
“Daddy’s little girl”.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/08/conflict-interest-exposed-corrupt-judge-jia-cobb-who/ Judge Jia Cobb is a sorority sister of Lisa Cook
Three mortgages on a salary of $225,000/year. Two high-priced lawyers. It would be interesting to know how she is funding her defense; maybe trading cattle futures?
At least she could sell the original autograph she received from PDJT
Eisen is Brookings (see his mentorship w/LA mayor Bass).
Brookings is Wittes’ Lawfare.
Lawfare is the “Coalition of All Democratic Forces”, that introduced the idea of an “insurance policy”, a “zombie apocalypse”, and planned on going after the Trump administration with the courts since Oct 2016.
https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/coalition-all-democratic-forces-part-iii-what-if-trump-wins
When you’ve lost CNN…
—-
Pulte
@pulte
CNN now agrees about Lisa Cook!
Video linked….
…then you’ve lost the mouthpieces for the FBI. 😉
When you’ve lost CNN…
You know they threw you under the bus
Eisen should face heavy sanctions for his serially frivolous litigation.
Perhaps being forced to resume his podcasting with hysterical lunatic Jennifer Rubin.
But then he might have an Eighth Amendment claim himself.
They are all making excuses for her because she’s black. That discrimination thing goes both ways.
Looks like ol’ Norm has aged quite a bit these last few years.
Be a shame if it was internally.
She is not paying one penny of lawyer bills.
It shouldn’t but it still amazes me how crooked the elite class is. It doesn’t matter if they’re black, white, brown, man or woman. They do and get away with things the average person doesn’t even think of.
Despite her having 3 properties, I’m sure she isn’t considered rich by any means, so the question is how is she going to afford these two high priced lawyers who will rack up hundreds of hours each in her defense, which may be even more if this goes all the way to the SCOTUS by way of the appeals court.
That begs the question of who is paying her legal fees. Obviously some Leftist group, possibly Soros-affiliated, will bankroll her because that is how the Left rolls.
That is how you know this is all about lawfare to stop President Trump.
Trump’s building a case that the entire bureaucratic state and its numerous off-shoots are corrupt to the core. Once that narrative has really sunk in, then the truth about Jan 6th, 2020, and COVID won’t come as such a great shock for the majority of people.
What interests me is how the DS are burning through the credibility of their signature DEI hires by forcing, or encouraging them, to continually go to bat on a very sticky wicket. Ditto their hacktivist judges and cadre of corrupt lawyers. What are they worried about, beyond the obvious?
The judge on the case also has a conflict of interest, but that won’t stop a corrupt judge.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST EXPOSED: Corrupt Judge Jia Cobb Who Blocked Trump’s Mass Deportations and Now Oversees Federal Reserve Mortgage Fraudster Lisa Cook Revealed as SORORITY SISTER! | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
Will Ty Cobb be in the on deck circle to represent fellow furry mustache member John Bolton?
DIG ON HER TAXES
DIG
DIG
DIG
Amazing how all these radical anti American operatives and swamp creatures get pro bono high priced shysters that have their hands in the attempted destruction of this country
First, she is not paying one penny in legal fees. Second, in a non-corrupt world, those many thousands maybe tens of thousands of dollars from free legal representation would be considered income subject to income tax.
Just indict her already. Let the games begin!