The FBI are in charge of the investigation of Thomas Matthew Crooks; that does not inspire any confidence. However, it does explain the seemingly controlled leaking of information to the various media sources in order to keep the eyes of the public exactly where the investigators want them.
In every article and investigative detail that is leaked to media, remember the origination source of that information is coming from the FBI. Top men.
The latest information to leak out includes revelations the FBI is going through 2 cell phones, a laptop and some USB drives belonging to Thomas Crooks. From the same sourcing they are saying that Crooks conducted online surveillance of several public officials for several months [NY Post Article].
In addition, the Wall Street Journal is sharing that Crooks flew a drone over the venue of the Trump rally earlier in the day in order to scope out the best place for attack.
SUMMARY – In addition to bringing explosives, a detonator, a ladder, a range finder, a backpack and an AR15 rifle to the rally, while finding a way to sit atop the counter-sniper position, the 20-year-old without a social media footprint apparently had air superiority.
(Via Wall St Journal) […] The gunman who tried to kill Donald Trump was able to fly a drone and get aerial footage of the western Pennsylvania fairgrounds shortly before the former president was set to speak there, law-enforcement officials briefed on the matter said, further underscoring the stunning security lapses ahead of Trump’s near assassination.
Thomas Matthew Crooks flew the drone on a programmed flight path earlier in the day on July 13 to scour the Butler Farm Show grounds ahead of Trump’s ill-fated rally, the officials said. The predetermined path, the officials added, suggests Crooks flew the drone more than once as he researched and scoped out the event site.
[…] The use of the drone was just one way in which authorities have said Crooks planned his attack. Crooks, described by friends as very smart yet withdrawn, began researching the site shortly after the Trump campaign announced the rally on July 3, and registered for the event on July 7, officials said. He visited the farm show grounds a few days later to scope it out.
On July 13, officials said, he returned with a pair of homemade bombs that appeared to be designed to be set off by remote control, as they were fitted with a receiver like the kind used to set off fireworks remotely. Investigators found the rudimentary explosives in Crooks’ car parked close to the grounds, along with a ballistic carrier, or vest, with three, 30-round magazines in it, an indication that he might have wanted to cause greater carnage. (read more)
The details the FBI are leaking, essentially a narrative they are intentionally constructing every day, is essentially trying to give the appearance of gross incompetence as an explanation for what happened.
We appear to be watching the FBI create and sell a ‘mistakes were made’ narrative every day.
I’m not sure the public is buying it.
There seems to be some pretty convincing audio analysis that indicate two shooters. Have you seen that Sundance?
Beat me to it; had I read before I furiously typed I would have see it.
Buuuut Noooooo…
regarding his “rising shot theory”, the rally feed I was watching showed fluid under high pressure spewing out of a punctured hydraulic line on a boom or fork lift near the stage. It was yellow as I recall like the one at the bottom of his photo. Leak was fairly high up the boom. It was fairly high up too.
Yes, I saw that as well, and as the fluid spewed the lift came down. It had been extended, hoisting the Speaker stack into the usual elevated position.
this photo shows that the lift crane that spewed hydraulic fluid (at bottom of photo next to green tractor) is roughly in line with the first shot that struck PresTrump in the ear and has been said to have hit a guy near the top of the bleachers, and gone on to ricochet off that white hand railing … the bullet may have continued on to pierce that hydraulic hose
the photo was in this article, page 8 of the comments
A 20-year-old With a Ladder, a Range Finder and an AR15 Walks into a Trump Rally….
Sorry, but that is the opposite side to where the person was hit, and the subsequent spray or flash occurred. Your picture would indicate that the hydraulics would have been hit first, not last.
no – you need to pay attention to what I wrote:
“this photo shows that the lift crane that spewed hydraulic fluid (at bottom of photo next to green tractor) is roughly in line with the first shot that struck PresTrump in the ear and has been said to have hit a guy near the top of the bleachers”
at bottom of photo is the lift that sprayed hydraulic fluid
also at bottom of photo, corner of the bleachers very near the green tractor is where the spectator was hit and the ricochet off the white hand railing was
I understand that the yellow line and yellow triangle draw attention to the OTHER hydraulic lift mid-photo, but I didn’t make the drawings and have no control over the linework, I just found this photo in the Treehouse article I cited and thought it’s a good photo to discuss the various elements because they’re at least shown …
the photo can be used to illustrate the sequence described by the “multiple shooters” video if you follow in sequence from middle of photo (Trump) to bottom (victim in bleachers, handrail, hydraulic-fluid hose pierced)
so you’ve got to disregard the yellow triangle and follow my wording to understand … I’m describing the opposite sequence than the person who drew the yellow graphics, apparently
and I don’t know the source of that description or the photo, I simply came across the photo unmoored from its source, someone re-posted just the photo to the Treehouse article I cited, page 8 of the comments
it looks like the person who drew the markings had the opposite in mind, as you describe
but that is not what I was contending
follow?
if anyone’s got a better photo showing all the elements with the correct markings or no markings, we can refer to that
until then, this photo can be grounds for discussion better than no photo
cheers
… and the spectator and railing that were hit would be at the bottom-most corner of the bleachers, again, very near the green tractor and hydraulic hoist
Nim,
One bullet??? starting to sound like the whole JFK thing all over again.
How, with all the noted perturbations of that bullet, does it remain sailing in a straight line?
Multiple bullets fired from the same spot in the same direction makes more sense to me.
It was, but I take your point well, many elsewhere were citing where each bullet went and how many people it injured and things it broke.
The Magic Bullet all over again.
Nim is much smarter than that and knows much better.
thx, Maquis, new comment just above yours
“one bullet” is not my theory, others have postulated that
I’ve got no dog in that fight, I’m simply providing photos and other info (such as my 11-shot count from a video – downthread here) to facilitate discussion and sorting out some of the facts
I’ve posted this photo because it shows some of the elements being discussed, like the spraying hydraulic fluid from the crane at bottom of photo … we’ve seen that on videos, well, here’s an aerial photo showing layout on the ground
as I cautioned Carolyn just above, don’t pay a lot of attention to the linework on the photo, the value is mainly in the photo itself in showing main features under discussion
a small clarification:
the yellow linework IS helpful in showing that various elements were roughly in line:
— Sniper Crooks position
— PresTrump
— Spectator shot at top of bleachers
— Hand railing ricochet
— Spewing hydraulic line on crane at bottom near green tractor
Whether one “magic bullet” or several shots*, the yellow line shows the multiple elements were roughly in line
*- several shots — they’d all be roughly in line if sniper was holding the same aim … “multiple shots fired in the same direction” as Lurker360 says above
they’d NOT be in line if he was intentionally spraying the crowd back and forth
some fine distinctions, but words have meanings, so we try to use them well
thanks to all for your discussion
9/11 all over again. They knew it was coming, it was expedient for their agenda to let it happen, they made it safer by using explosives in the building, ensuring the building collapsed on itself.
They waited for Trump to go down, and thinking he was dead, the SS sniper took the kill shot on Crooks.
They failed, time to get rid of Biden.
Most plausible theory.
No. The audio is from Trump’s mic at the podium. The first three shots are with Trump standing at the podium and speaking. Trump was between the mic and the path of those three bullets. The last five are Trump on the ground, dog-piled by agents, mic and podium jostled away. So of course the sound characteristics are different first three from last five. Different mic positions. Different sound-dampening and sound reflecting bodies or objects around the mic pickup.
There is no evidence that the guy in the flag shirt got hit by the same bullet as grazed Trump’s ear. Nor that that same “magic bullet theory” round somehow diverted course to hit the railing. The bystanders, railing, forklift, etc. were all likely hit by subsequent rounds from the shooter.
The shooter carefully lined up his first shot and almost hit Trump. Even so the shooter was slightly off and Trump’s unexpected head move turned Trump away just enough so the shot only hit his ear.
The famous “bullet trail” picture does not show the bullet. What appears in the air is a particle trail dragged along in the wake of the bullet and following the path of the bullet. That aerosol trail consists of skin cells, fluid and fragments of cartilage ripped out of Trump’s upper ear. It probably hung in the air for several tens of milliseconds, maybe a hundred milliseconds, before the wind dispersed it. Those particles would be described as “blood spatter” if there had been a wall there to deposit themselves onto. The straight path shows the bullet experienced minimum perturbation after passing through the thin, fleshy tissue of the upper ear; no visible yaw or tumbling, definitely no deformation of the bullet itself. The round passed through the ear skin and kept on its path, long out of frame when the photo was snapped.
The shooter’s next two shots all went high. Muzzles rise after shooting. Muzzle brakes help but the barrel naturally tends to rise in rapid fire. The shooter starts breathing heavily and jerking the trigger. Follow-on shots miss most of the time. The last five were just a spray as fast as he could pull the trigger and likely went wild.
nice interpretation, Gulag — thanks
He’s done a good job identifying audio features like initial shots, the crack-thump character of the shots, reflected echoes, etc … and makes a good case for multiple guns / shooters … the first 3 shots definitely are different in character from the second sequence of 5 shots, the rapid-fire 4,5,6,7,8
There’s some evidence for up to 11 shots
George Web’s article counts 11, and I count 11 on a different video clip than the multiple-gunmen clips in the video above
By my count, there are 3 very late shots (9,10,11), the first of which causes a TV commentator to exclaim “There are still shots being fired”
link to my discussion:
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/07/16/it-gets-worse-three-security-detail-snipers-were-inside-building-used-by-trump-shooter-secret-service-director-says-roof-was-too-slopey-for-sniper-safety/#comment-10932185
and here’s the video I analyzed, shooting starts at 27:53 on the youtube counter (the small numbers, not the larger numbers on the original video footage
BREAKING! Stunning New Details in Trump Assassination Plot Exposed | Redacted w Clayton Morris (youtube.com)
the George Webb article
New Evidence Points To Multiple Shooters In Trump Assassination (substack.com)
https://georgewebb.substack.com/p/new-evidence-points-to-multiple-shooters
Evidence is developing that the pro shooter was in the same line of fire but on the roof behind the patsy
I’ve also seen video of a guy in black on the water tower.
I don’t know if the video has been verified or not.
I saw that as well. There may or may not be a black star on the side of the water tower. If there is a star – it could have been used a camouflage.
The tree line is a good camouflage
The rest is suspect of a video.
Cannot tell if it is a person at all but I think the inage in detail in question is a dark area down to the right of the star on the catwalk of the tower.
The star is on the center of the tank. The black figure is on the top of the tank
The figure was standing and moving on the very top of the tank, next to the ‘spire’.
See video on July 18 Redacted broadcast on rumble and ewe toob.
The water tower theory is a red herring.
It’s an easily provable there was not a shooter from that direction.
That’s one of the reasons the Deep State keeps putting that out there.
They know it just muddies the waters and when it’s proven nothing came from that direction they can say “See, we told you the shooter was this Crooks kid.”
The real sniper was stationed below the patsy that was in the roof.
The water tower is a classic case of misdirection.
Don’t be fooled!
If someone can take a gun powder residue test near the window below the shooter it would turn up positive.
Above, and behind, second story windows in next building over, connected to the low roof building the shooter patsy was on, providing a firing solution almost identical to the purported lone shooter.
Agreed the tower is implausible for either a shooter or a counter sniper, an easily fabricated red herring.
Though, I caution, Bongino had been told that the kill shot to the low-roof shooter was from an unphotograghed snippet team way fast away making a miracle shot through a tiny nine inch window through a tree. He didn’t mention that the trees were blowing around as much as the flag . . . I wouldn’t be surprised if they claim this shot came from that tower.
I have little doubt about shooters inside the building under the roof top Patsy.
I only thought the water tower could be useful in executing the Patsy.
That and maybe if the crowd did burst in a frenzy- the opportunity to take more victims- like Las Vegas . Thankfully they did not.
They needed to make it so no one would return to rallies.
I think the tower is implausible for taking out the shooter patsy, but I agree that could have been a hell of a platform to murder many more.
The only problem, the crowd didn’t flinch, they didn’t panic, they stayed with Trump, and likely spared many lives that way.
If the photograph of Crooks was not doctored then the shot was most likely a straight in shot to the back of his head.
If it was from the water tower it would have hit him in a steep angle. 📐
Supposedly, into his eye, exited from his neck
Folks keep trying to put a bullet through this guy’s face to explain the apparent damage on the back of his head, with no entry wound from the front.
First they were saying he was shot through the mouth, with no evident trauma to his lips.
Now it was through an eye? His eyes had been closed, the orbits are undisturbed and undistorted, there are fully intact ocular globes in both sockets, the image is on the next page down thread for your viewing pleasure.
The hit does appear to have damaged the back of his head, down low in the occipital region, but it was an entry wound.
There was no exit wound on his face because the termination round was specially set up for this shot, larger bore, suppressed weapon, low powder charge, probably a frangible bullet, all designed to ensure that there was no over penetration leaving no bullet trail through the body and building pointing back to the shooters in the high-windows behind the shooter-patsy.
That was the only way to ensure they could terminate him at will, that he couldn’t hide from the kill shot, and leaves no evidence that they can’t control and hose away.
I also don’t think a sniper that thinks he “is not the patsy” takes the water tower shot. There is no quick or stealthy egress from that location.
I have only heard about and seen the water the water tower figure on Redacted, and here at the Treehouse. I have no knowledge of any mainstream news media putting out a story that includes the water tower.
On Sunday July 14 Jovan Pulitzer talked about high points in the perimeter that should have been covered by SS. He said the tower was the tallest structure, and so should have been cleared or manned by SS.
You can find Jovan’s podcast on rumble, and linked on State of the Nation. He is no ‘fly by night’.
I also saw him on a panel with Ann van der Steel and Alex Jones talking about the shooting:
https://rumble.com/v56xp39-fight-fight-fight-all-star-line-up-maga-get-ready.html
That one would be very easy to fake, the detail is so low.
That supposed figure moved from concealment and purportedly appears to maybe take a standing shot, then disappears.
Counter snipers don’t do that. They are unobtrusive of they can manage it, but they don’t pop around the corner and zip a shot through the trees in a nine inch window with the wind blowing the trees and then say my work is done here and slink away.
Witnesses interviewed said there were two shooters and they were both shot and killed. One of the shooters was on the water tower.
Where might they have said that and who did they say shot the tower shooter?
Check out the beginning of each Redacted show, July 15-18, on rumble and ewe toob.
I heard and saw those witnesses too.
There are at least 10 eyewitnesses to the water tower figure.
Try inside the adjacent building, 2nd floor, windows open facing Trump.
That can’t be right. Our beloved Secret Service people were valiantly standing guard there.
They snuck from there unseen through the building interconnector to the two story behind the shooter on the low roof.
🎯
They had to have a way to get the gun to Crooks so he could be the patsy. They couldn’t have just walk in with it,or risk an honest spectator just walk up and find it
Crooks left home with his father’s AR that morning to go to the range, he never got there.
Instead, he got picked up and put on ice.
Crooks’ weapon was provided to the shooter patsy, Matthew Yearick, 30, thug, felon, Antifa organizer, that way he didn’t have to sneak it in, or even carry it up to the roof very possibly.
It was a double patsy play.
The Antifa guy has the gumption and the Communist hate to drive his motivation to do the shooting, but he has a hell of a history and it all points to his buddies in the Derp State, too dangerous to let the Intersphere do a deep dive on him and his associations.
So they have a second patsy, a quiet kid easily demonized in accordance with the tropes of the day, likely groomed via gamer chat rooms and such, but never actually gonna shoot anybody or know anything about it, he’s a blank slate, they can fabricate his associations, his donations, his online presence, and deposit cell phones the Derps pretend they can’t crack and put foreign intrigue on his computer, boom, custom made distraction-patsy, all eyes on this kid, none on Antifa.
Of course, they have to burn and deep six both bodies; Yearick’s doesn’t bear Crooks’ DNA; Crooks’ doesn’t resemble Yearick’s. Pretty sure Crooks was processed on Saturday after they took a DNA sample to pretend it came from Yearick the shooter.
Why would they need both?
Your theory doesn’t make sense to me.
If anything they wouldn’t want anybody associated with antifa as a patsy.
All they needed was a patsy that wasn’t smart enough to figure out that they were going to use him and kill him.
It’s an enhancement of their JFK patsy play, where Oswald supposedly is roped into the scheme but allowed to be killed by Ruby days later who is then offed by a CIA psychiatrist who doses him with poison of some sort.
No, they don’t want the Antifa guy identified at all, but he was willing to play their murderous game, and was well qualified for the part.
To hide his identity, they groom a supposedly troubled kid that still manages to maintain employment at a nursing home and work for an engineering degree, two years just completed at a community college, already enrolled in classes to start this fall at a university to complete his degree. Not a typical hopeless murderous dead-ender, no trail of Antifa or convictions or arrests or thuggery.
The first was easy to put on the roof, but dicey to put in the newspapers, so the second patsy provides the identity imposed on the former, an identity so young and blank that they can impose any actions and thoughts upon him as they wish, nothing in the records to contradict them, but perfectly planted devices and files that say everything they want him to say.
It makes all the sense in a demonic world.
Pics provided on next page for your viewing pleasure, they are, revealing.
If it can be written, can be done. Clancy? The Shooter?
Maybe not on the roof but inside a room with an open window.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6hTbo6IKSI
My theory, inside the building. Same building. From cover, with just a small hole to fire through. Very difficult to see.
“Evidence is developing that the pro shooter was in the same line of fire but on the roof behind the patsy”
well, that’s not good news for a “rising shot” theory, now, is it?
Projecting the trajectory of the bullet photo backwards is consistent with that rooftop. It is also consistent with Crooks’ rifle (within the margin of uncertainty). It is NOT consistent with the water tower. Analysis here: https://showme.bravesites.com/entries/general/the-whizzing-bullet-is-consistent-with-crooks-rifle
This an article from Zerohedge that has a very plausible scenario with detailed pictures.
“Trump Second-Shooter Theory Emerges”A working theory on the attempted assassination of a presumptive president.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2024-07-19/trump-second-shooter-theory-emerges
Crowdsourcing the assassination investigation is the only way. We all know the FBI is corrupt.
.gov will be pushing the single shooter narrative when the audio clearly indicates two shooters. Two shooters = conspiracy.
Don’t buy the initial narrative, like those which were pushed in the JFK and RFK assassinations. The truth in these assassinations only was revealed decades later.
The problem with these good “theories”, is that many of them come from the FBI dilution and disinformation team.
Yes- he said it was approved to be released by CNN.
This FBI script would not fly in a Hollywood movie. The plot is not believable.
In every lie there are elements of truth
Exactly
Under both theories, i.e., one shooter, or two or more, the circumstances surrounding this attack automatically implicate a conspiracy. Thus the facts simply do not support that any one or more shooters could have had the opportunity to fire so many accurate shots without having the aide of someone who had knowledge that the event was going to occur, and whose assistance was absolutely instrumental to the opportunity that Crooks/or others had to fire his/their shots.
Best way to coverup a conspiracy is to start floating conspiracy theories.
At some point, there’ll either be suspicious deaths of USSS agents there that day, or a protected whistle blower or 2 who tell a story much closer to reality then the total BS spewed by the fbi and other corrupt filth.
Lots of suicides and heart attacks of 20 to 30 something men in a dream job making $150k a year?
Kinda like the Capitol Police casualties the week after J6!
The most likely scenario to me is that yes, Crooks was a, or the, shooter. He was groomed and gently nudged toward this by online actors, that he probably thought were fellow gamers, but were probably government psyops agents. Like the retired and current FBI agents “surveilling” the Buffalo shooter. Or the FBI people grooming the “kidnappers” of Wittmer.
There may have been a back up, professional shooter…. but maybe not. It has to be considered that the shot that almost killed DJT came from Crooks’ weapon. It was not that difficult a shot. The trickier part was to allow him into the venue.
Those pesky MAGA people that spotted him and insisted on getting the local cop, that probably wasn’t in on it, to go up the ladder to take a look, probably made the difference. Crooks had to speed up because the cop spotted and distracted him right before he fired.
It’s difficult to believe that the lid could be kept on a plot with so many actors, yet it was years before Durham got to the bottom of Russia Gate /sarcasm
The BBC reporter was stationed exactly where he was and was doing the interview with the red head on purpose.
That video was very much part of the set up, imho. Its purpose was both to solidify the lone shooter narrative by drawing eyes to the patsy, but also to enrage people once the President was dead.
Someone should question that JournOList about why he was there and who told him be at that spot.
@Sundance
Have you seen this? Haven’t vetted it personally.
Trump Shooter Used 3 Encrypted Accounts OVERSEAS to Communicate
https://vigilantnews.com/post/what-trump-shooter-used-3-encrypted-accounts-overseas-to-communicate/
So sayeth the Derps.
Nobody believes it was incompetence or dei. Pretty much everyone thinks deep state is involved. We’re just debating the details.
DEI Another Day.
I am not a gun expert but from what I am hearing and seeing of Crooks he doesn’t see like a good enough shooter todo what was done.
That’s because he wasn’t and he wasn’t placed there to shoot President Trump.
He was placed there purposely as a distraction and for misdirection. They just needed him there to take a few shots before they killed him so he could never talk.
They used him as a pawn, then did the assassination attempt in a way to make it appear as if Crooks did it all by himself.
From the beginning I realized he was killed so he couldn’t talk.
But it is so sick that this kid was set up to die!! Actually to be murdered.
Two set up and murdered, a thug and a kid, the thug plays the killer, the kid merely provides the spotless canvas upon which to paint the image the Derps want us to see, something they couldn’t do with their Antifa shooter.
My posts on the subject are throughout this thread if interested.
If we don’t crack this, it won’t happen at all.
Oswald all over again. What cold SOBs!
Especially since he scared the cop away from the roof and then started shooting seconds later. He would have to be one cool cucumber to do that.
It was not a hard shot to take, if you’re a brainwashed video gamer devoid of a conscience.
In a day or two, you could train a person who’d never fired a gun to consistently hit a head size target at 130 yards with a decent AR with even a medium quality optic on it.
Maybe and maybe not–I head too many stories of the Military gun train, but yet they still give them a gun and sent them into battle..
Yes, official count is over 50,000 rounds fired per enemy casualty in Vietnam
IF he had good vision.
There is a myriad of factors that have to be considered in ballistic sound signature analysis. Suppressors sometimes used by the counter-snipers can make analysis more difficult. Even the supersonic crack of the bullet can deceive a listener’s sense of its origination. Did the one that hit Trump get picked up by his mic and amplified? It’s a big challenge to sort things out from multiple microphones. I’m skeptical of a dual assassin theory.
Analysis is actually very simple and easy.
The FBLie would want you to believe otherwise.
And you being skeptical of a dual assassin means there propaganda and misdirection is working on you as intended.
Are you suggesting the FBI is promoting the dual assassin scenario? If so, then I don’t know how that helps them. Now they have one dead shooter and one missing shooter and a bunch of people suspicious that the missing shooter is on the payroll of larger conspiracy run by some mastermind .gov evil doers. I don’t buy it yet. For now, I think Crooks had the luckiest day of his life until it ended and Trump had the luckiest day of his life, too.
Every one of these events has a question of multiple shooters. So far, it’s following the pattern. Oh, and why did this kid have a drone but the SS did not?
If there was a second shooter on another rooftop, I would expect the bad guys would want a bird’s eye view to make sure no other high up witness could spot that second shooter. A cover story to explain any accounts of a drone flying? Just spitballing.
My analysis shows the trajectory of the whizzing bullet from the photo did NOT come from the water tower. Best guess is that it passed about 5 feet over Crooks’ roof, and about 3 feet over the roof of the tall building directly behind Crooks at the far end of the property. However, there is a significant margin of error, so it is also consistent with Crooks’ rifle. https://showme.bravesites.com/entries/general/the-whizzing-bullet-is-consistent-with-crooks-rifle
F’in Bureau of Instigators.
All the Walmart shootings, ‘they’ got caught and took down 8 chan over it. Oh, people thought it was because of Qanon? Nope, it was because of an unredacted 8 Chan ID from a Judicial Watch FOIA that blew open the whole enchilada. Who do you call when the FBI is the criminal? Yeah, not a clue…
JULY 19 2024
WSJ
Trump Gunman Flew Drone Over Rally Site Hours Before Attempted Assassination
….was able to fly a drone and get aerial footage of the western Pennsylvania fairgrounds shortly before the former president was set to speak there
fired at least six rounds…. leaving Trump with a graze wound to the ear.
….Crooks, described by friends as very smart
…a mixed bag of clues for investigators to sort through
( archived )
https://archive.ph/hkCFy
The audio analysis posted above indicates Crooks fired shots 1, 2 and 3.
1, 2, and 4 maybe?
Could be I have to watch it again but the analysis is pretty convincing for 2 shooters. I hope some other non-gubmint experts confirm.
It indicates that those shots came from the same general area “Crooks” was located.
Towards the end he suggests the first 3 shots may have come from the building below. Which explains the rise in the trajectory & echo. And that Crooks fired the later 5 rounds, which was used as cover coming from a similar direction. The final shot was to Crooks head.
For all we know, they could’ve given him blanks- which is why nobody seems to account for where those other later bullets landed.
Also it was reported just after, 3 snipers were positioned inside that building:
IMHO – those 3 snipers I’ve been referring to as Inky, Blinky, & Clyde (b/c of the PacMan looking protection zone), have some explaining to do!
Love the Inky, Blinky and Clive reference. We should never forget the PacMan perimeter!
Ya better go back and think that one thru….how many casings found at shooters site ( we will never be given the truth ), but if the first shot was the one that hit, ya can bet it was the real employed marksman.
Yup.
First three a pro.
Next few, maybe Yearick, maybe another pro playing inept into the crowd.
Last one suppressed and low charge frangible from the side window of the two story behind the shooter, in order to prevent over penetration, which would leave a trajectory trace, and a much bigger mess to clean up and conceal.
“The audio analysis posted above indicates Crooks fired shots 1, 2 and 3.”
I don’t think so
Doesn’t the analyst contend that the first 3 shots had to have been fired by a ground-standing sniper because they were “rising shots”?
That the first shot was a rising shot that hit PresTrump and went on to hit a spectator at top of the bleachers and ricochet off the white hand-railing shortly thereafteer?
He clearly shows that the first 3 shots differed in sound quality from the later shots, but I took him to deflate that the first 3 were from Crooks on top of his roof
The public does not “buy” anything the feds say about anything.
This is becoming a nasty script. I, for one, think it was a deliberate attempt by the powers to kill Trump.
The shooter did not “miss” Trump. The Hand of God moved Trump’s head and God spared his life. The target was Trump. Without the Hand of God Almighty, Trump would be dead. One man is dead and 2 others are recovering.
I have NO respect for the secret service, or any federal law enforcement org/ageny.
And neither should Trump. Good info. Thank you Sundance, Blessings.
I fear the public, in general, buys a lot more propaganda than the gentle readers of CTH do. Decades of experience in my own demographic support this. If one isn’t ‘of the body’, social castigation and stronger measures result. BTDT.
In any event, I’ll be flying the Trump flag as a conversation starter with the thousands descending on the dunes shortly and we’ll see what happens; whether they believe the propaganda or not, irrespective of whether Communist, patriot or other. I’m a good listener. People want to tell their story. I let them. 🙂
I’ve long been a cynic when it comes to government, I’d say back to before Watergate, so no surprise my take on matters aligns pretty well with most here.
I’ve long opined if we can imagine it, the Communists have war-gamed it. Hence, little of this is a surprise or unusual to me. I’m a bit miffed why they waited so long to take their shot. IMO, the timing was horrible. It is what it is.
“The public does not “buy” anything the feds say about anything.”
You mean it wasn’t safe and effective after all? LOL
In Canada 1/3 of the public support the head puppet master. Hard to understand how many are still asleep.
“the seemingly controlled leaking of information to the various media sources in order to keep the eyes of the public exactly where the investigators want them.”
Which is why I spend a lot of time here, rather than following the shiny objects the MSM puts out.
The Conservative Tree House is a place for grownups. Fox, NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, MSNBC are places for drones.
I believe no released statement by the US gov’t or the media about this event period
I should add that I am highly skeptical if any media, (pictures or video) that was not immediately available or real time as it happened. Remember its relatively easy to edit video and pix these days
Why should we believe anything they say? They have been caught lying too many times.
Did the drone also show that the “best place” was just outside the Secret Service bubble?
Where did this info about a drone come from? Did they supposedly find it when they searched the house?
Beautiful! 🤣
“Well, it’s a mess, ain’t it Sheriff?”
“If it ain’t … … it’ll do ’til the mess gets here”
— Deputy Wendell and Sheriff Ed Tom Bell, No Country for Old Men
The woman in the black hat behind Trump’s left should when he was shot has been tentatively identified as Janeen DiGuiseppi, Assistant Director of the FBI’s Insider Threat Office. The same woman who seemed to brace before the shots fired, then pop up and film it, smiling as Trump went down.
I’m certain it’s just a ‘coincidence’…
Here’s a video where they cover the topic to include crappy video of a figure on the water tower;
I wonder why somebody would be filming a water tower while shots are bring fired? I would be hugging the ground.
In college an intoxicated person fired at me from inside the cab of his pickup approximately 30 feet away. Everyone appropriately freaked out and ran for cover. For reasons that I can’t explain, I just stood there, shaking my head in disgust and stared at him. Fifteen years later, I’d find myself drenched in sweat, laying on the kitchen floor, pale from adrenaline, unable to stand, all because of a tiny cut on my thumb from a peering knife. The human response to things is sometimes just beyond explanation.
your knives peer out of their drawer at ya?
They weren’t. The water tower is a red herring.
I believe that has been discredited. Lara Logan has more info on her X feed.
Could not find this from Lara Logan. I am not an X user but when I clicked on her X account there were postings but not the one you speak about. Can you provide a link for it? I would be most interested as I have watched the JESSE ON FIRE video that someone else posted here. Thanks!
I shall take a look, I did couch my post with ‘tentatively identified’ since ‘doppelgangers’ are a thing.
She has not been identified.
Stop with that nonsense
Did I post that is was hard fact or did I say ‘tentatively identified’? Besides, we’ve caught the FBI red handed enough times that it’s not much of a stretch to even consider.
The woman is not JD.
Curious as to why you insist it is not Janeen D. Couldn’t it be? I understand that she has refused to say where she was that day, only to say she was not at the rally.
It is NOT an FBI person.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/07/19/attempted-assassin-thomas-matthew-crooks-flew-drone-over-trump-rally-site-on-day-of-shooting-2-cell-phones-laptop-and-usb-drives-being-reviewed/#comment-10950513
Anybody who was in on it would not have been close to Pres Trump that day. They could easily have become collateral damage.
I don’t think it’s the same woman but there is definitely a general resemblance. The nose, mouth, and jawline are different. Plus that would be the worst place to put her, consistently in the camera view.
This story about the “FBI woman” behind President Trump has been completely debunked. You are the first person to add the “smile” touch.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/07/19/july-19th-2024-presidential-politics-resistance-day-1278/comment-page-4/#comment-10947770
If they had made the one in charge a chunky female, it would have been perfect…
The United States under this administration now has less than zero credibility. World leaders will never take “Democracy” seriously again.
Making it up as they go.
Next, it will be Iran gave him the drone and was assisting him. 👀
As an aside, when this story broke, Don, Jr tweeted out sarcasm that the Secret Service wouldn’t even let him fly a drone at MAL’s beach when Pops was around.
And the FBLie thinks we’re buying this crap?
If they know this now, they knew it then and haven’t said a thing about it until now????
Puhleese.
I am surprised they haven’t drawn a line to Putin as yet.
Speaking of Putin. Might want to ask the Russians about the incident. Their intelligence ferrets out and exposes things that the western (controlled and censored) media narrative hides from the American people.
That conversation could only be face to face alone.
Nah. Putin and Pres Trump are best buds, haven’t you heard?
Not one of numerous folks interviewed mentioned that they saw a drone flying around the around. Their lies are multiplying. Where are they on the Matthew Yearick story?
I don’t know where they are, but Maquis has put a bunch of work into it.
May want to scan for his comments on it a few days ago.
Thanks.
Matthew Yearick is likely swimming with the sharks right now.
My guess is they are completely ignoring it and we will never hear his name again.
“Crooks conducted online surveillance of several public officials for several months…”
The eye of Sauron knew of these searches and more…and decided to cooperate by reducing Trump’s protection to an easy to predict unefficient mismatched blob?
Probably more made up info to flesh out the narrative.
Drone answers how shooter knew roof was unmanned and where to scale up to it. Or at least makes it appear thats how he knew bc that is a dam good question…
You can also “drive” around the whole company campus using Google Street View and look for the nooks and crannies of the connected buildings.
Help us, Jesus! With all the lies that are spewed at us on the daily by the media/government, I am praying for wisdom and discernment often.
The good news is this is as close to Hell as we’re ever going to get fellow believers….. that is a great comfort.
Yeah this is 100% lies. When will someone with balls take control?
1/20/2025
With God’s help, January 20, 2025
Some time in January.
The most amusing narrative so far is the suggestion that, after waiting four years, the Iranian government contracted a 20-year old incel from rural Pennsylvania to perform an assassination days after the Presidential immunity ruling and 48 hours before the dismissal of the documents case.
That’s such a transparent lie that the very use of it confirms the guilt of the murdering Deep State swine who peddled it.
Isn’t that rich?!
IMO, the one item that is completely unexplainable which indicates deliberate malfeasance is the failure in let Trump take the stage when they had spotted the sniper on the roof a few minutes earlier. There is no logical explanation for them to allow him to go up on stage. None
Either the information is wrong or someone DELIBERATLY sent Trump into the crosshairs of a shooter.
Now, information that SS detail members were pulled and DHS agents were substituted makes the antennae start twitching.
That has been my question, as well. Why was Tump not alerted of this suspicious person and suggest to hold off the speech, until they get this guy checked out. Stupid is as stupid does. How in God’s blessed Name do they think we’ll believe this??!!
Two shooters according to the audio analysis.
And since we are not European can we please dispense with the pluralization of all nouns? Please?
The FBI is an it, its are singular; it is, they are. To use the Britishized form is a affectation, an elitism, a division between the 2 groups present in the US.
Globalists use pluralized nouns.
Globlaists like John Kerry and Barack Obama.
Do not mimic those sub-humans, please.
See guidelines- spelling and grammar errors aren’t ‘gtaded’ here.
Correkt!
Understood, but the point was less grammatical and more a counter to a growing and sneaky trend of elitist affectation.
Doesn’t that picture seem to put the shooter on the far east side of the bldg, not the more westerly side where they have that picture of the body and the gun? Is it just optical illusion because of the depth of field?
MNN BREAKING NOW…
* IN DESPERATE AND BIZARRE CAMPAIGN PLOY, BIDEN CLAIMS THAT HIS SHOOTING OF DONALD TRUMP MAKES HIM A WARTIME PRESIDENT
Manufactured News Network: “Are You Still Pretending This is a Government?”
Dude! 🤣🤣
HSI was in charge that day, not USSS. Homeland Security Investigations. The same group who set up and carried out the fake Witless Witmer kidnapping plot and framed innocent victims.
Cite?
Not sure about that, but they were definitely involved with J6.
They are the ones who tried to persuade that green beret (Jeremy Brown?) in Tampa to work for them on J6 weeks before J6.
When he refused and blew the whistle in March of 21, they framed him.
Secret Service COMPLICIT; FURIOUS Senators Confront Director; New Timeline DEMOLISHES Cover-up
By Robert Gouveia
19 Jul 2024
https://rumble.com/v57kh2d-secret-service-complicit-furious-senators-confront-director-new-timeline-de.html
The same group who set up and carried out the fake Whitmer kidnapping and b.s. was in charge of President Trump’s security in Butler, PA, HSI, a division of Homeland Security.
Well, Whitmer and J6.
And IIRC, answer to Mayorkas too.
If. we….accept that reports seem to agree, (I discount all gov’t statements and media statements) that HSI was there in place of some SS.
However to state that HSI was in charge would be to fly in the face of the fact that the Secret Service is always in charge of these events even if they had a reduced presence.
That is why i am asking for a cite that the HSI was in charge on 13 Jul at Butler, Pa. It would be unheard of for them to usurp the SS responsibility for such an event.
The Iranian “threat” is perfect cover. DHS has higher authority when terrorism is involved.
HSI were not in charge, Secret Service was. That is by law and policy. Using agents and officers from other federal agencies to augment/assist Secret Service is standard practice since time immemorial. The media is also getting all this mixed up, which is contributing to the confusion by the public.
Mixed up on purpose.
HSI was not in charge, Secret Service was. The HSI officers, and other Federal and State officers, were on temporary duty there to augment Secret Service. Nothing new, standard practice, although reports coming in are that there were an abnormally low number of real, experienced Secret Service agents that particular day.
Weren’t Dr Jill and kamala in Pennsylvania that day, SS resources more heavily on them?
Jilldo was a half – hour south of Butler in Pittsburgh, Mattressback was in Philly.
Both answer to Mayorkas. SS has statutory responsibility.
Don’t forget the foreign connections:
“… The shooter used three encrypted platforms in Germany, New Zealand and Belgium…”
https://www.axios.com/2024/07/18/secret-service-fbi-trump-assassination-attempt
If those countries are accurate, then what they are effectively saying is that he used either a VPN or TOR…LMAO @ FIB.
Yup.
“ The CIA used encrypted platforms in Germany, New Zealand and Belgium to communicate with their latest patsy asset.”
Gosh Darn!!!!!!!!! ………and I thought the FBI were going to go with the Joy Reid narrative that Trump colluded with the USSS to fake it for the photo op prize.
Now the collusion narrative is going to have to compete with the incompetence narrative.
Maybe incompetent collusion is an option?
I think Joyless colluded to propagate a hate whitey and Trump narrative that inspires violence.
I think you are on to something with the theory of incompetent collusion. Combine that with malicious obedience and we have the following:
hmmmmm………….”incompetent collusion. Combine that with malicious obedience and we have“……. the current WH and its’ administrative minions!
Sums it all up, neatly! Incompetent collusion and malicious obedience – it can be the Dems moto for the convention!
The fireman’s family needs to sue Joy Reid for 1.5 billion, get judgement against her network, and have the bankruptcy court liquidate them all.
This kid was way ahead of the SS if we can believe this stuff.
I’m starting to think we just may have found the elusive J6 bomber…
Maybe even QANON?
Look on the roof- not underneath, inside the building. Forget the water tower.
Just keep accepting and focusing on the “acts of incompetency” that allowed that “lone shooter” on a rooftop.
It did not go as intended. The odd bits coming out and overwhelming silence from Departments Directors indicates a panic over something that is no longer in their control.
They will not be able to wrap this up neatly.
Unfortunately, that means they will just progress to the next greater level….nothing like a real crisis to take away interest from the past crisis
The next operation – which would be successful- some crazed MAGA taking out Joe in retaliation.
The Dems need to create some kind of movement or Sympathy— then they could roll Big Mike out to be the voice to bring calm them and the narrative peddling media.
Isn’t this the only Trump rally CNN has decided aired live? Funny that….
I seem to recall CNN being tipped off before the FBI or intel carries out an operation in the past.
“ Pssst CNN, You’re going to want to be at President Trumps next rally. We can’t say much but it’s definitely going to be Trumps last rally and as Joe Biden said, it’s time to get him in the bullseye.” ~Cheatle
Yes- the media all received word to make it down to Charlottesville for some event. The event that Biden handlers created for his 2020 Basement Campaign.
Yes, Roger Stone’s early AM rousting by the FIB.
The first one that Certainly Not News has carried live in quite some time.
“However, it does explain the seemingly controlled leaking of information to the various media sources in order to keep the eyes of the public exactly where the investigators want them.” – Sundance
Notice how no one is talking about the open border anymore as illegal aliens continue to pour in! Costing us free housing, debt cards, food, healthcare etc and getting instructions on how to vote in November! Congress and the corrupt leftist state run msm don’t want the border discussed it’s working just fine it’s a ballot harvesting machine! JMO
I’m okay with this focus on the attempted assassination of Trump. In me, it inspires rage, but also sympathy for Trump. I bet Trump’s support is growing every minute that the focus remains on the s@#$ show that was the attempted assassination. The plotters screwed up and with people becoming aware of the conspiracy their position is increasingly precarious. They are likely to attempt something even more stupid.
Check this link for info on possible additionall shooter(s).
…CNN ODDLY CONFIRMS — Audio forensics suggest as many as three weapons fired at Trump rally
Forensic analysis suggests that as many as three weapons were fired at the Trump rally in Butler, Pennsylvania on Saturday.
• The first three shots were consistent with alleged weapon A
• the next five were consistent with alleged weapon B
• and the final “acoustic impulse” was emitted by a possible weapon C
This is per audio analysis by Catalin Grigoras, director of the National Center for Media Forensics at the University of Colorado in Denver, and Cole Whitecotton, Senior Professional Research Associate at the same institution.
w/ Vid 6:14 min
“SUMMARY – In addition to bringing explosives, a detonator, a ladder, a range finder, a backpack and an AR15 rifle to the rally, while finding a way to sit atop the counter-sniper position, the 20-year-old without a social media footprint apparently had air superiority.”
Gosh, according to the fib this guy was a one man army. He is just as bada** as John McClaine (Bruce Willis) in DIE Hard.
Next they will report he had a jet pack to propel him to the roof.
Joy Reid from Msdnc said yesterday she doesn’t know what’s wrong with President Trump’s ear and thinks a FOIA needs to be filed to see if he was really shot. These people are all 🦇 💩 crazy.
e
I don’t know what’s wrong with her hair. FOIA that.
HaHa! Good one!
No jetpack – he reached the roof in a single bound, faster than a sniper’s bullet…
But for four years, no one in the media wanted to FOIA to learn if there were signs of brain activity between the pResident’s ears at any given time or day.
I think the public has a right to that information.
Blackrock’s fingerprints are all over this
it a real world it would be on the way of going out of business
BlackRock is a CIA front company.
It’s used to launder billions.
During the Pre-Scheduled Race Hate Riots, the FBI’s Soros Air Wing flew an army of drones–to protect the rioters, not citizens.
Kyle Rittenhouse had his own FBI channel–but not PDT?
“It’s as easy as lying because it is lying.”–G.K. Chesterton
THIS OCCUPATION GOVERNMENT JUST TRIED TO MURDER OUR RIGHTFUL PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP.
We bind this wicked spirit of murder by the authority of the believer. We decree confusion and discord in the camp of the enemy as their wicked deeds boomerang upon them, bringing their downfall, defeat and disgrace. We lift up Your Beloved Children, Father God, and speak Your Glory, Deliverance, Liberty, Healing and Love as Your Kingdom Comes, Lord Jesus. Live Unto Victory, Amen!
Amen!
I don’t know one single soul who is buying their narrative.
The government blew its last tidbit of credibility long ago.
Gaslight alert!!!!!
It’s beginning to look like deliberate SS incompetency & deliberately choosing the worst DEI staff to aid the assassin. If it wasn’t deliberate, it is arguably the worst DEI bungled assignment in Biden’s ill fated regime.
The FBI easily could be steering the narrative toward a non existent manufactured foreign influence manipulating the assassin or they or others provided Crooks w/ instructions and devices.
A few RCMP under cover “friends” manufactured a pipe bomb scandal in Victoria by providing 2 dopey druggy, young Muslim converts all materials and instructions needed to plant kettle bombs near the Legislature–except for the fake explosive compounds. The 2 spent 3 years in jail until a Judge ruled it was an outrageous entrapment scheme.
This a factually true story about how easy it is for trained officers etc. to manipulate & entrap some people
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt27691231/plotsummary/?ref_=tt_ov_pl
“We appear to be watching the FBI create and sell a ‘mistakes were made’ narrative every day.”
“ I’m not sure the public is buying it.”
Exactly this Sundance!
They only have two options.
The first option is to admit that they were attempting to assassinate President Trump.
We all know that they will never do this for the obvious reasons of what comes with that admission.
The second option is to play stupid, act stupid, pretend that this is all happened because of mistakes being made.
The problem they have is that there is no possible way they could have made that many mistakes in a row. This is the most premier protection agency in the whole world, and they do not make those kind of mistakes.
They never planned on missing the shot. In all the chaos that would’ve ensued, they would’ve been able to hide everything and go on still holding the levers of power.
They missed. I think that’s the reason why the two Secret Service agents flinched. I think it was because they were in shock that the real sniper missed that close of shot. They know that if it connected President Trumps head would have snapped back and he would have fell like the guy in the bleachers did.
So there only recourse is to try and control the narrative and leak false information to get the people to look at Iran, the patsy, the police…look at anything but them.
Good points, I agree.
Absolute unmitigated bullshite. There is no way any 20-something would-be assassin would be able to both fly a drone and analyze the video, and then come up with a plan of attack. Unless he was trained very specifically, by say someone whose name rhymes with Pete Steak.
It ain’t rocket surgery my friend, just saying
Wow crooks really was a mastermind outsmarted the usa ss whose mission was to stop him.
During the Pre-Scheduled Race Riots, the FBI’s Soros Air Wing flew an army of drones–to protect the rioters, not citizens.
Kyle Rittenhouse had his own FBI channel–but not PDT?
“It’s as easy as lying because it is lying.”–G.K. Chesterton
THIS OCCUPATION GOVERNMENT JUST TRIED TO MURDER OUR RIGHTFUL PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP.
We bind this wicked spirit of murder by the authority of the believer. We decree confusion and discord in the camp of the enemy as their evil deeds boomerang upon them, bringing their downfall, defeat and disgrace. We lift up Your Beloved Children, Father God, and speak Your Glory, Deliverance, Liberty, Healing and Love as Your Kingdom Comes, Lord Jesus.
Live Unto Victory, children!
Real with Love
Proverbs 24:19-20
Do not fret because of evil men,
nor be envious of the wicked;
for there will be no reward to the evil man;
the candle of the wicked will be put out.
Amen!
Leak this here, leak that there. Create a trail so the hoi polloi will follow. So obvious. Why not one grand press conference beginning with the words, ‘this is everything we know…’ The reason, narrative engineering, as Sundance said. The only people that don’t know that everyone knows they are the clowns in the circus is the clowns themselves. fbi. Corrupt to the core, top to bottom. Irredeemable.
I thought it important to implement a 72-hour rule some time back before setting pegs in the ground for analysis. We’re well past 72-hours and the story seems more like quicksand than hardened concrete.
You can be sure the vast majority of the public believe the narrative. As they do with all such official narratives sold by the MSM in their roles as stenographers.
Breaking this down into easily digestible connected information chunks day by day just reinforces the initial first statements.
If the Deep state persuaded, planned and aided this Crooks guy, they would absolutely need the emerging story line to deflect from that association. So, they leak all kinds of made up stuff that point to a lone shooter and away from them. Dead guys don’t talk.
I don’t buy for a single second this bullshit about two cell phones, explosives and detonators, now a drone story (unless they convinced him to fly one) and the lack of internet presence?
I have to wonder what they were telling him, especially since he told his co-workers he’d be back on Sunday. They must have given him the impression that he will survive. “You get the job done and you will be a hero, revered, go down in history”, ” We have your back if things go sideways and will get you out safe and sound”, “you will be well paid and want for nothing the rest of your life”
The thing that gives me hope is our army of citizen investigators that are combing over video, audio and other evidence, will ferret out the truth. We can hand the evidence to PDJT’s AG, hopefully on day 1.
Things that make you go hmm:
-Immediately after the shooting, there were pics of the shooter with camo pants, then shorts and another with white pants.
-Immediately after the shooting, there was talk of at least 2 shooters
-The gun pattern sounds like 3 shooters, the final being presumably from a sniper towards the shooter
-Has anyone traced the line of fire for the shots that that hit Cory the hero firefighter and the 2 other civilians? Would the shot that hit Cory possibly have saved PDJT’s life?
-3 different vehicles have been identified as the shooters
-How did BBC scoop the first interview with composed viewer of all the events so quickly? Something struck me as soon as I saw it.
Curious Cat remains curious. Inquiring minds want to know.
2nd shooter’s name was I. M. Perps <sarc>. Crooks and Perps. Feel like I’m in a hallucination. This is just too unbelievable.
Deep in the classified bowels of Government highly trained expert Bureaucrats are using state of the art technology to protect us 24/7…
Dear MacPepper,
I just now copied the picture that you posted in your comment and Texted it to my wife and daughter with this comment;
This!
This Right Here!
This right here is just one of the reasons I like scanning through the Comment Section of articles on The Conservative Treehouse.
Treepers are some of the best educated, most well informed, highly resourced people that you could possibly hope to come across.
(End of Text)
MacPepper,
That picture is pretty much more education than some Ivy-League institutions teach in a Bachelors Degree program. You are very well resourced.
Thanks!
I saw this today: Forensic analysis indicates that up to three weapons were fired at the Trump rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, on Saturday.
This suggests that there was more than one shooter.
– First three shots came by weapon A
– The next five came by weapon B
– The final shot was by weapon C
Shot one and two line up perfectly with each other.
Shot three does not line up.
Shot four and five line up perfectly.
Shot six does not line up.
Idont know if you can get this twitter link but its about the Tower Shooter who ziptied backside to a SUV w Dept of Ag Plates disappeared.
So if any of it true, one of the above shots could hv been him?
apologize for length thank you
I just posted it upthread… CNN confirms — Audio forensics suggest as many as three weapons fired at Trump rally audio analysis by Catalin Grigoras, director of the National Center for Media Forensics at the University of Colorado in Denver, and Cole Whitecotton, Senior Professional Research Associate at the same institution.
MJTruth Ultra posted it on X, there is a 6 min vid with no enhancements or filters.
The 3 different shooters are Crooks and 2 different law enforcement snipers?
“The 3 different shooters are Crooks and 2 different law enforcement snipers?” I watched a longer version of the analyst guy talking about it. According to him, there were 4 shooters.
First group of 3 shots were probably from inside building that Crooks was standing on & the 1st shot is probably the one that hit PDJT. Next group of 6 shots were mostly by Crooks – #1, #2,#4 & #5 were by Crooks (2 videos lined up those shots perfectly) Shots #3 & #6 were by a 3rd weapon & further away & did not line up with shots #1, #2, #4, & #5. Shooter/weapon #4 is one of the two snipers on the roof killing Crooks.
Somewhat apparent that Black Rock’s drone flying
contribution would have provided better security than the assembled JV team. He possibly even would have placed the shell casings in pristine order of appearance as did Alek Hiddell on the 6th floor. Also kinda wondering when the next loudly presented performance
of the song DOWNTOWN is scheduled…with of course the
requisite accompaniment of Directed Energy Mayhem.
Here’s a discussion of a second shooter. Pretty good.
TLDR;
There was an open window on a second floor building that was next to the building the perp was on. The window has a direct view of Trump. If there were any cops in that room they would have seen the perp easily, so probably not cops in there.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6hTbo6IKSI
Another point from the video. The cops could easily find the shell casings from the perps rifle on a big metal roof. Therefore, no doubt of how many shots he got away.
There are several cut up versions of this video circulating, but context is everything …
This is the full uncut video, 32 min, directly from the horse’s mouth, Chris Martenson, Ph.D. … at the 11 min mark he explains the first three shots were on a rising trajectory. No way Crooks could have fired the first shot which strikes the President’s ear, then a metal post before hitting a man standing at top of bleachers. He suggests probably a 308. In any case all the shots fired went to the stage by two weapons, only one shot went to Crooks . Worth the watch. He’s got some smart folks posting under it as well.
https://x.com/chrismartenson/status/1814114895065141491?t=Ob1eA3ClBXxDFRxbT_s16w&s=01
Photo of the century #2, the one that shows the bullet after hitting Trumps ear…the bullet appears near horizontal.
I’ve done analysis on that “near horizontal” trajectory in the photo. Lots of uncertainty, but best guess is that it traveled about 5 feet above Crook’s roof and about 3 feet above the tall building directly behind Crooks at the far end of the property. See here: https://showme.bravesites.com/entries/general/the-whizzing-bullet-is-consistent-with-crooks-rifle