A revelatory article in Politico [SEE HERE] discusses a secret tribunal that Joe Biden has created to act as an arbiter in the space between the USA internet and the EU user privacy rules. However, if you apply the Occam’s Razor perspective, you might discover the tribunal or secret court is really just an arbiter of content, a “filtering system”.
Those who do not pretend have long ago realized the systems deployed to control information and communication will always be the priority. You cannot intentionally abuse a victim and yet allow them to have uncontrolled contact with family, the abuser needs to keep the victim isolated. The same is true for government in their need to control information that might expose their purpose.
Recently European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said controlling information was the #1 priority of the WEF group for 2024. That makes sense, when you consider that organized pushback would be counter to their agenda.
The western alliance of nations is collaboratively focused on definitions to help with their disinformation, misinformation and malinformation agenda.
Into this mix comes the European Union with rules and regulations on user data, a valuable commodity when enmeshed with commerce and the internet. The USA does not have those same rules and regulations on user privacy, all our metadata is under surveillance by corporations and government, so an arbitration system is needed where an EU member, group or nation can demand the stoppage of an American company from retaining EU user data.
Joe Biden has assembled a tribunal or quasi-judicial court system for the purpose of having a destination for EU complaints and violations. One of the people appointed to the tribunal review team is Eric Holder.
(Via Politico) – At an undetermined date, in an undisclosed location, the Biden administration began operating a secretive new court to protect Europeans’ privacy rights under U.S. law.
Officially known as the Data Protection Review Court, it was authorized in an October 2022 executive order to fix a collision of European and American law that had been blocking the lucrative flow of consumer data between American and European companies for three years.
The court’s eight judges were named last November, including former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder. Its existence has allowed companies to resume the lucrative transatlantic data trade with the blessing of EU officials.
The details get blurry after that.
The court’s location is a secret, and the Department of Justice will not say if it has taken a case yet, or when it will. Though the court has a clear mandate — ensuring Europeans their privacy rights under U.S. law — its decisions will also be kept a secret, from both the EU residents petitioning the court and the federal agencies tasked with following the law. Plaintiffs are not allowed to appear in person and are represented by a special advocate, appointed by the U.S. attorney general. (read more)
If you read the full article then pause and think about how the weaponization of government can benefit from the tribunal, the truest prism for finding out why something exists, you might realize the panel is essentially tasked with creating an isolation box for EU data, then guarding the gates and making determinations over who should have access to it.
Knowing how valuable data is in the world of e-commerce, the question becomes will the tribunal guard the data or exploit it.
I think we know the answer….
Keep in mind, walls are being built around the U.S. financial system to lock in the yellow zone. Corporations now control most western governments. How does the control over EU user data interface with that agenda?
Discuss.
There’s Holder again. He should be in prison.
Working to keep the cattle corralled or otherwise they may leave to eat in greener pastures.
Grow high hedges (barriers) so the cattle can’t see or dream of, the “greener pastures“.
i.e. All the lies about Russia as a sovereign, Christian, hospitable destination.
I’ve had nearly 70 years of indoctrination, but the last 10 years are “water off a duck’s back” to me now.
Russia is NOT the Soviet Union – but MSM and others would have us still believe it is.
Well it makes no difference really to us here in the Scottish Gulag.
We are spancelled branded and haltered already.
Hmmm… Biden can just CREATE a court? Like Poof?! WTAF?!
actually he cant legally, ARTICLE III Section 1The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.
We are in a post Constitutional world. Too bad Americans think the Constitution still exists. And their “selected” representatives just continue to play off their scripts to keep the con going.
I think Article I courts (administrative law courts) began after the civil war with the Court of Claims? though maybe Bankruptcy Court was in the mix. Administrative law is its own ball game, though I think in most cases you have an option to take the matter to an Article III court. Then you also have today the Tax Court. (OK I searched Court of Claims and actually it was created in 1855).
I’m sure that the republicans will stop him.
Ok, so this appears, on the surface, to be a privacy issue related to user data. Can the construct of this system apply to beyond just user data? What else could be funneled through it? Or can it be used to identify people with certain interests and “redirect” their access to certain info? How will AI be used to identify certain characteristics of user for corporate or government control purposes? All of this user data is useful to corporations for marketing, but governments can use it to design collection and targeting campaigns.
And Holder just made a veiled public threat to SCOTUS, telling them they had better vote the right way on Trump’s ballot removal case.
Let’s get something straight here…..Joe Biden is nothing more than a body being used by Barry the Kenyan in the basement. Biden has no brain, is unable to think and can not change his own diaper. So let’s quit pretending that Biden is anything but what we see. An old, tired, used up corrupt politician that has become too much of an albatross around the necks of the establishment…especially the demonrats! The bumbling fool of a resident is a fricking joke and we all know it!
So all this is coming from the enemy within…..Barry and his cohorts in crime! Treasonous elites…..and it’s time this whole country looks behind that curtain and see what really is.
Identify and know the enemy…..there is no other way to win a war! And a war is exactly what we are in. Don’t think so….keep paying attention, the next 10 months ought to wake you up!
Only one point to disagree…Barry is just as much a tool as Pedo-Joe?
Both are controlled by higher powers.
As for “knowing the enemy”?
We probably don’t know who is actually running things?
They have enough $$$ and power to remain anonymous.
We only know their henchmen?
I will never fill sorry for this guy and his family
EU has a major problem on the horizon: the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) places very specific constraints in respect to private data collection, storage, use.
In many respects, all of this is the calm before the proverbial storm – there are huge, huge, huge social, ethical and legal storms on the horizon for AI for both private AND public data. Lawsuits/class action suits are at the nascent stage but will only grow over time.
Anything associated with the wingman needs to be dismantled immediately.
Corporate control of government is, by definition, fascism.
Obama is the tool of the left, not it’s leader. He’s used and abused more than a redhead step child, probably doesn’t even realize it. you’ve seen what harvard is putting out these days
James E Baker is also a member of the Data Protection Review Court. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/attorney-general-merrick-b-garland-announces-judges-data-protection-review-court