UPDATE: Outline edited as original review cited Mar-a-Lago case, this is DC case.
As expected, the first legal motion to dismiss the DC January 6 case is based on the first constitutional application, presidential immunity. [Full Filing pdf HERE]
President Trump’s attorneys John Lauro and Todd Blanche say within their first filing that special prosecutor Jack Smith’s case against President Trump is an attempt to criminalize actions that were well within his White House duties, such as enforcing federal election laws.
“The Constitution, the Supreme Court, and hundreds of years of history and tradition all make clear, the President’s motivations are not for the prosecution or this Court to decide. Rather, where, as here, the President’s actions are within the ambit of his office, he is absolutely immune from prosecution.”
It is a strong and compelling argument, citing numerous prior cases and rulings on the plenary power of the executive and the constitutional establishment of the President as the absolute power within the executive branch. The argument hits one of three core tenets that Jack Smith has used to establish his case.
Even left-leaning Politico seems to accept the foundation of the DC Smith case weakens when contrast against the executive power of the president.
[The] prosecutors’ case is really about distinct powers that the president has: communicating with the public, organizing his administration, talking to Congress, enforcing election laws and ensuring the Constitution is faithfully executed. Whether Trump genuinely believed that the election was stolen — which his attorneys say he did — is irrelevant in assessing his immunity from prosecution, they argue.
“This conduct is manifestly part of the President’s responsibilities in our constitutional tradition, and the question whether the President has a formal role in the election certification process makes no difference,” the attorneys wrote.
[…] Trump’s attorneys say there’s an even more fundamental problem with the charges against him: He was acquitted by the Senate in an impeachment trial for similar conduct. That acquittal, they say, renders Trump “absolutely immune” from prosecution for related acts.
“The Impeachment Clauses provide that the President may be charged by indictment only in cases where the President has been impeached and convicted by trial in the Senate,” the attorneys wrote. “Here, President Trump was acquitted by the Senate for the same course of conduct.”
The Senate acquitted Trump despite a 57-43 majority favoring his conviction because of a two-thirds requirement in the Constitution. At the time, Trump was charged with one count — inciting insurrection — related to his speech to a rally crowd that later became the mob that stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. The impeachment trial came just a month after the attack — and shortly after Trump had left office. (link)
What is a constitution???
“It’s not about whether or not he’s guilty It’s about the seriousness of the charge.”
Because the dhimocrats are into character assassination that is juicy & works well in the media.
FJB, BHO & Asoc…..😉🇺🇸
As the great Mark Steyn often says (to paraphrase) “it’s the process” to tie you up in expensive and time wasting legal knots
To be a bit more precise what Steyn says is that “The process IS the punishment” and he is absolutely correct.
And it is also the unfettered use of the nigh infinite government resources, freely available to the fascist Democrats, to administer the process, which is the enactment of the punishment, namely, the waste of Trump’s time and resources. This the definition of lawfare.
Same done at a lower level in a community. Just accuse anyone you do not like of sexual abuse of a minor. In the end it is confused to be untrue and made up out of nothing. But the results are accomplished as people never remember the acquittal only the accusations that were brought.
absolutely~ The punishment IS the Process whether you are found guilty or NOT~ KUDOS, Spooky!!!
How will WE greet them at our door??? This is the difference between being involved or committed!!!
Are you laying the egg and brooding, or can you smell the bacon sizzling???
I smell the aroma of FREEDOM~Immunity comes with Constitutional Awareness mixed with Action~
Kudos due to Mark Steyn … and to Spooky!
I used to really enjoy when Mark sat in for El Rushbo. I haven’t seen anything of his for a while.
The (other) Great one – Mark – is still alive after a major health scare and is available at Steinonline.
He resigned from our pretend Free Tv Channel GBnews as he was harrassed by our state censors over here by a QUANGO called Ofcom. He is now suining them in the London High Court.
One of the last free spirits which the satanists are trying to throttle.
https://www.steynonline.com/
Mark is a gem!
And politically, where are we now? As a public we are now at a point where they’ve gone too far with “seriousness of the accusation.” Look at how the Russell Brand thing has gone. The first round was a public nothing. They are now going for a second round which is drawing yawns from the public. It only works when people didn’t know what was going on and why. We all know it now.
That ONLY works if you play by the Government Party’s rules – the status quo says you’re right.
It has not worked on Trump (polling and $$$ are way up) because he has rejected the status quo and refused to follow the Government Party rule book.
This is something our allies with (R) next to their names have yet to realize. You can only be damaged by this if you agree to play by the Government Party’s rules.
No thats a consternation.
“What? You mean like a definition?? I’m not a supreme court justice.”
Release the tapes.
Biden has actually said that, at least three times, and has lost at SCOTUS all three times. The eviction moratorium, the vaccine mandate, and the student loan forgiveness. In all three of those cases, Biden actually stated that they were not Constitutional, but he was doing it anyway. The lower courts also threw out the mask mandate. Why didn’t Biden appeal that one? It was a sure loser.
In contrast, Trump has a terrific record at SCOTUS. Throughout his Administration, the Left used lawsuits to block Trump. In virtually every case, he prevailed, and all they really did was slow him down a little while waiting for cases to make their way to SCOTUS.
These indictments are a sick joke and the DOJ’s arguments are so stupid that it’s a miracle they’ve made it this far. The whole thing will fall apart once somebody who can ask questions is allowed to ask questions. Judge Cannon tried, and she was overruled by the Appellate court. There’s no chance DOJ gets to SCOTUS and is allowed to hide their case.
Similar to Meadows but with substantially broader immunity for Trump.
The brief is, so far, a great read, if you’re into things like that.
Agree. As a (now retired) attorney, I appreciate a good brief. Many of them are not good. This one sparkles, and has taught me some things I did not know. Clearly, in my mind, a preview of the penultimate SCOTUS brief. A warning shot fired across Obummer’s bow, I mean Smiths bow, of course.
Let the fight begin to save this Republic.
This will be decided by the Supreme Court!
Yes but it will take time. The lower courts will convict and uphold. The SC should step in and shut down these phony indictments. They are allowing our justice system to be destroyed.
This motion can delay the trial until the Supreme Court makes a decision.
I think under other circumstances the SC would rule against President Trump BUT since their decision would severly cripple future presidents and emasculate the authority of future Presidents making them subjected to the whims of local prosecutors, judges and grand juries the SC will be forced to dismiss all of the indictments!
Exactly what I thought!
There is the precedent of the non- precedent, IIRC, when the SC declared Bush-the-elder winner in the hanging chads case but said the decision should have no bearing on future cases.
They are depending on the SLOW moving justice system to take Trump out even though ALL the “indictments” are ridiculous.
You have a faith in the SC that I just don’t have anymore.
100%
Can’t the Florida court dismiss the case?
The way I understand this article is that Trump is being charged with a “crime” of using constitutional rights of the presidency?
Yes, in other words if the President of the United States can be charged with a criminal offence in performing his official duties, even acts on the outside perimeter of those duties, than the Office of the President would be handcuffed and ineffective. Who would accept such unlimited liability especially at the hands of political enemies. The President must be free to make difficult and, at times, ugly decisions that on their face in the light of day under ordinary circumstances would seem reprehensible to the average person. The President cannot be second-guessed by bureaucrats and unelected officials.
I not elected an I question everything biden does.👀
Its prosecuters that bring false charges that should be second guessed and removed from office.
Exactly, Captain!
But look what we’re having to tolerate with the Biden Clan!
But he was and is.
Absolutely correct, which may be why the current crop of candidates (both R & D) feels so “bottom-of-the-barrelish”…nobody decent wants to put themselves in that position. Except our best candidate, President Trump.
I hope Jacob Smith loses.
Duh.
This is the bottom line…
President Nixon said that “if the President does it, it’s not illegal” and the Supreme Court (in the
case Nixon v. Fitzgerald)
essentially agreed with him.
Blatant election interference is reason enough to put an end to this f@ckery!
All while costing President Trump money and more money and more money, time, energy, strength, endurance, frustration, upset, living with lies, personal insults, lawfare trolling, and ridicule from the media.
God bless Donald J. Trump. God willing, he will prevail against all the powers of this world to become our president once again. Amen.
Yes it is interesting isn’t it, that when you are an honest person you are despised. As far as I can ken, President Trump and all in his family are open, forthright, and honest in all conduct re their financial transactions. Along with conduct while as President? Why is this is so FRUSTRATING to anyone on this planet?
Contrast this treatment to money launderer’s, child trafficker’s, bribe takers, etc. who are just ignored and free to be who they want to be and do with NO QUESTIONS asked?
Its difficult for me to digest all these things all at one time.
I figure by the end of all of these cases against the most amazing President ever, these lawfare warriors will end up owing President Trump court fees, etc. etc, etc. And Jack Smith eff you too.
Reveals just how upside down the Marxists had to turn our culture for any of this to last longer than a not-funny joke.
What is NOT-FUNNIEST is what they’re doing to our churches. 😳😢
Can she require the DC Federal cases be brought to Florida and her court?
Yes
It would have been done already. The 1/6 indictment was brought because the documents indictment was forced to stay in Miami.
If the cases are consolidated, the one with the older case number, most likely Miami, becomes the one all other cases are consolidated with.
I still think they should move to consolidate in the grounds that both cases deny Pres. Trump rights and authorities that are inherently his. Those documents are HIS documents, by law, and the election was rigged and he had and has every right to say so.
From 2020,
Be Proud to be an Outsiderhttps://freedomaustralia.freeforums.net/thread/318/proud-outsider
https://freedomaustralia.freeforums.net/thread/318/proud-outsider
A well-known lawfare criminal hack, impersonating an attorney and not a very good one at that. Railroading, the real President Trump, with made up BS charges.
The 3rd world black female (lesbian?) “judge” will deny the motion, which should be appealed all the way up to SCOTUS, if necessary (and possible). This bullshit needs to end RIGHT NOW.
Always on the defensive.
I was not happy w/Clinton and his crimes, Bush and his crimes, certainly wasn’t happy w/barry’s long list of crimes, can’t tell you how many times I have heard the talking heads wail about precedent. If you do it one, you have to do it to them all.
Why should Trump have to be the one, especially considering he is the only one that is innocent? Rhetorical. These people drive me crazy. God Bless President Trump. I am so sorry he has to deal w/all this crap.
They are doing it to Trump BECAUSE he is innocent. They are all globalists; his real crime was fighting globalism.
You forgot to mention the I was not happy with the Bush crime family cartel and their criminal unconstitutional activities of treason either.
“I can’t spare this man–he fights.” Abraham Lincoln, in support of General Grant prior to his Vicksburg victory which turned the tide of that war.
His advisors recommended surrender. Lincoln chose the bulldog instead (which never lets go).
I like Matt Gaetz for similar reasons … he fights (smartly).
It would seem to me that if this case collapses on this Presidential immunity legal construct, so too would the Atlanta case for the same reason. That is probably why Trump’s attorneys didn’t bother appealing the dismissal of the change to federal court.
You are 100% correct!
@willscharf
BREAKING: President Trump files motion to dismiss D.C. case
A short while ago in federal court in Washington, D.C., President Trump filed a motion to dismiss the case pending against him there for his alleged actions in the aftermath of the 2020 elections. The motion cites presidential immunity as a ground to dismiss the case in its entirety. This is a very big deal.
The motion persuasively argues that the D.C. case should be dismissed, and if past practice is any guide all proceedings could and should be stayed while this issue is litigated fully. Notably, this same reasoning should apply to the ongoing Georgia prosecution as well.
A number of legal commentators have anticipated this move, and in this thread I’m going to get into the weeds and review the core argument made—that presidential immunity is an absolute bar to the prosecution of President Trump for his alleged acts in office that underlie the federal prosecution in D.C.
1/6
— skip–
4/6
(D) Appealability
One final note on timing: any denial of this motion to dismiss, or any similar motion in Georgia, is likely immediately appealable, as is the case in where Congressional legislative immunity is implicated. Which means, depending on how long it takes Judge Chutkan to rule, this issue could be before the D.C. Circuit and potentially the Supreme Court before long.
Continue reading full thread…👇
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1709994666467192942.html
Jacksputin will fail.
Then he will retreat to his home in the Netherlands and live out his life in well-merited ignominy.
no he wont. they never retreat and live in ignominy. they crawl out from under their rock every few years.
And THAT is exactly the reason why these out-of-control Marxist prosecutors need to be indicted and prosecuted themselves in order to set an example for any and all others: Nuremberg 2.0!
That is why they are executed for treason. To keep them from coming back and causing more harm of the innocent.
Is there an extradition treaty with them? It may not b a good choice.
Dunno, but that’s where he lives, convenient to his Global Derp State persecutions at the International Criminal Court at the Hague, they only drug him back to assault President Trump.
The Indictment Alleges Only Acts Committed Within the Core of the President’s Official Responsibilities, Which Are Shielded by Absolute Immunity.
The indictment is based entirely on alleged actions within the heartland of President Trump’s official duties, or at the very least, within the “outer perimeter” of his official duties. As President Trump is absolutely immune from criminal prosecution for such acts, the Court should dismiss the indictment.
A. The Scope of Criminal Immunity Includes All Actions That Fall Within the “Outer Perimeter” of the President’s Official Duties.
The Supreme Court adopted the expansive “outer perimeter” test for immunity precisely
because any “functional” test would be inconsistent with the broad scope of Presidential duties.
Id. at 756; accord Blasingame Amicus Br. at 9 (“This immunity, the Supreme Court has explained, may not be curtailed by attempting to parse discrete Presidential ‘functions,’ or through allegations that official acts were taken with improper motives. Because the President has ‘discretionary
responsibilities in a broad variety of areas, . . . [i]n many cases it would be difficult to determine
which of the President’s innumerable ‘functions’ encompassed a particular action.’” (quoting
Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. at 756)).
In other words, the “outer perimeter” of Presidential duties—and thus the scope of Presidential immunity—encircles a vast swath of territory, because the scope of the President’s duty and authority in our constitutional system is uniquely and extraordinarily broad. “Article II ‘makes a single President responsible for the actions of the Executive Branch,’” Free Enter. Fund, 561 U.S. at 496-97 (quoting Clinton, 520 U.S. at 712-13 (Breyer, J., concurring in judgment)), and the President is “the only person who alone composes a branch of government,” Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP, 140 S. Ct. 2019, 2034 (2020).
Among these Article II duties, perhaps the most fundamental are the framers’ dual mandates that he hold “the executive Power,” and with it, the duty to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” U.S. CONST. art. II, §§ 1, 3. To this end, the President must assume
“supervisory and policy responsibilities of utmost discretion and sensitivity,” which “include[s] the enforcement of federal law.” Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. at 750; see also Vance, 140 S. Ct. at 2425 (The President’s “duties, which range from faithfully executing the laws to commanding the
Armed Forces, are of unrivaled gravity and breadth,” and “[q]uite appropriately, those duties come with protections that safeguard the President’s ability to perform his vital functions.”).
12. Thus, even where a President’s actions are “directed toward the constitutional responsibilities of another Branch of government,” or concern “matters for which the President himself bears” no direct constitutional or statutory responsibility, id. at 11–12, his actions are often still within the “outer perimeter” of his official duties, see Fitzgerald 457 U.S. at 756.
It IS difficult to keep the cases against PDJT seperate, lol.
As many have posted, his legal team IS starting to punch back, andthis was a totally logical, predictable coarse of attack.
This case, with this prosecutor and Judge, will ONLY be won, on appeal.
Try to remember that, because it DOES alter the approach.
Every move of PDJT’s legal team, is aimed at the appeals court, NOT the Judge on the case.
KL’s legal team hasbeen in the same situation, with her election challenge cases, and has navigated it quite well.
Trump succeeds brilliantly with unearned media exposure! Unfortunately, the cognitively dissonant unawakened are comfortable in their cocoon of ignorance and loathing, reinforced by the legacy media squawking pundits. They blithely believe the bullsh*t.
In reading legal commentators writing about this issue, this appears to be a strong argument and one the Supreme Court would accept. It’d be nice if there were a way to get that Court to hear it soon rather than go through the charade of a trial. All of these show trials are a joke. In my view, one of the worst things Kemp has done is work behind the scenes to prevent any action against that out of control prosecutor in Atlanta.
Because they’re both on the same team!
The FJB administration will use a contorted idea of our Constitution as a ball f wax easily moldable to their evil intent fr We The People!
In a way, this is a sad play. They [the opposition] knew they had no case based on this fact in precedent and in the law. However, I believe this play was delayed to ensure the show goes on. Trump 2024 campaign has been largely funded by the federal and states’ legal spending and has only served to grow Trump’s popularity as the world feels the hurt of everything the globalists and the deep state have done, people have largely made up their minds.
Perhaps I just answered my own question — why now? Why so early? Perhaps this Aikido politics has run its course to the point of it convincing everyone who could be convinced of the enormity of pain and horror it could show to the public. And perhaps there are other interest such a PROTECTING the public from real and irreversible harm.
After all, the ramping up of the prosecutorial malfeasance targeting supporters will end up in police state murders in large enough numbers that failure to end this will leave Trump as politically responsible for allowing it all to go on.
This move, of course, ends ALL cases except the civil ones unrelated to Trump’s presidency. And the NY civil case is already won. So that will be that.
I would play a video in the courtroom of Hillary Clinton and any others who claimed voter fraud. Especially her.
If he wins he might have a good case against them all for election interference
That judge looks a clown,
Looks can be deceiving.
He’s actually an idiot!
I prayed my Isaiah prayer once again this morning. If We the People change our evil ways and repent to turn back to G od in prayer of forgiveness, praise, and thanksgiving that G od will hear our prayers and heal our land. Lord knows We the People need His Holy Spirit now more than any time before in our history.
2 Chronicles 7:14:
“If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.”
The SCOTUS decided these matters long ago, in cases that are studied in every law school class on the Constitution.
There are over 4,000 counties in this nation, each of which can empanel a Grand Jury. Our Republic could not function if, each time the Executive made a decision or gave a military order that some minion somewhere didn’t approve of, thousands of them handed down criminal indictments. The Members of a Branch of Government cannot be found guilty of a crime for exercising the duties of their Office as they see fit, even when said Branch consists of only one person. This is now settled law.
MAGA 👊👊🇺🇸🇺🇸❤️❤️🙏🏻🙏🏻
When you own the courts and the judges it does matter what you file of how many laws you break. Law fair is a construct of judicial twister. Just make up bend and twist and hope to be the last one standing.
Off-topic: I read in a reliable article that Joe’s wall is being made of “Jersey Barriers”. These are cement dividers on highways.
The article is in “The Hill”. “Biden stuns allies with border wall bombshell.” 10/6/2023 @5am.
Motion will be denied by chutkan. I guess you have to waste your time and jump through certain hoops before you get to the USSC.
And then you hit them with a lawsuit for malicious prosecution for every count in their fake and phony and fraudulent indictments.
And then you file a lawsuit against The KKKenyan and KKKrew, for violating your civil rights, spying on you, spying on your campaign, dragging you through their mud and squalor and swamp for six yeaers.
And then you do the same for all of the other lawsuits.
You hit them, and hit them hard.
And keep on hitting them until it hurts.
Exactly, you hit them until there is nothing left to hit.
In essence, Jack has no standing.
#HitTheRoadJack
When has the present office holders let law or constitution get in their way? For that matter, lawfare is nothing but lawfraud. Any blue state, like NYC, can simply say I am going to, and not get stopped. Law, constitution? What’s that? Presidential immunity? Hey, you’re not Obama or Biden.
If they ignore the Constitution and are politicians or government official/agents/aides/etc. they must be sworn to uphold and protect the USA Constitution. If they are no, they are not lawful and not of the government and are just criminals to be executed for their ‘high’ crimes.
Any attack or assault against the Constitution, such as LEGISLATION AGAINST the 2A!!!!, is TREASON!
The Constitution is the foundation of the federal government created by the states and bound by the Contract/COMPACT of the USA Constitution which governs all laws equally.
When they ignore the Constitution, they have no rights or lawful powers of authority as the Constitution is the framework for the government and their is no government without the Constitution. They are all selected and installed unconstitutional usurpers and invaders.
Hence, again, why execution of traitors and for treason is required for the continuation of any sovereign country from enemies and invaders foreign and domestic.
Like aiding and abetting an alien invasion of millions of illegal invaders by the fraudulent installed corrupt and unconstitutional government of TRAITORS.
Powerful statement!
This issue/motion should immediately stop all prosecutions in this case until it is ruled on. Might take awhile for a ruling too as it will most likely go to SCOTUS with all the lawfare games going on.
Great motion. Knew it was coming.
Not only does Trump have the constitutional rights of presidential immunity he also had a DUTY to make sure the elections were honest and secure. But hey I’ll take the win on immunity to end this lawfare nonsense
True .
The 1887 Electoral Count Act requires the POTUS to guard and verify US elections..
It is his CONSITUTIONL DUTY to do so.
Seamlessly woven throughout this supposed “indictment” is the word: false. The Prosecutor’s own assertion that “no crime actually occurred.”
So on the mark / they can twist like a pretzel and Criticize PDJT actions all day long IN the Press and Cable news BUT they can’t prosecute him for a crime for actions taken while President ( Jan6 etc ) – if that the case , why stop there , must be other impurely motivated actions ( the racial discriminatory wall etc ) that justify retroactive persecution ( sarcasm ) —We have a Constitution or we don’t – hope answer is the correct one ..
I wonder if Judge C. Will stall on this and hold off a decision on this motion (to avoid appeal ?) and “ handle it at a later date” and proceed as otherwise scripted /scheduled … ? Not sure of the procedural head fakes available …
WHY is America ignoring the most obvious form of election interference that’s common throughout the world and throughout history: POLITICAL PROSECUTION? Between political prosecution, violating FEDERAL ELECTION LAWS and CODES of CONDUCT, a corrupt media and communist democrat party ELECTION FRAUD, ELECTION INTEGRITY is ZERO! POLITICAL PROSECUTION VIOLATES the HATCH ACT – a federal law. ELECTION LAWS are being VIOLATED every election, yet the JUDICIAL SYSTEM DOES NOTHING! America has become a nation of COWARDS and USURPERS against American citizens. When the judicial system goes ROGUE, they too must be removed or VOTED OUT!
The legal standard an election must meet, in order to be certified!
1. The voter rolls must be accurate.
2. Votes cast must be from eligible voters.
3. The number of votes counted must equal the number of voters who voted.
4. The maximum number of ballots in error, for a valid federal election, is 1/125,000.
How do I add an image to a post?
Depends where you get it from.
If it is on a website you can right click and chose the image link to post here, it must end in either .jpeg or .jpg to work though.
If it’s on your computer, or is the wrong type of image somewhere else then download it to your computer first, then upload to an image hosting site such as imgur.com or postimages.org then select the appropriate image link and post it here.
I have found that if I have a .webp or other such I may need to convert it to .jpg using one of my image applications on my own computer first, which is a good skill to have as you can take your own screenshots and make them shareable too.
I’m far from the most competent on such things, but by listening to Treepers and giving it a shot I’m getting a bit more competent and it becomes quite easy after a bit.
Bonne chance!
What are the odds the judge dismisses the case? And what are the odds tge SCOTUS steps in to overturn her faulty ruling?
I say 100% and 50%
You mean Doesn’t dismiss -100% -?
Yep. Typo. My bad.
It’s kind of amusing how lawyers use words. Such as: “vexatious litigation.” Which is exactly everything that we see here, both criminal and civil. Criminal lawyers want to put The President(!) in jail for being The President, “taking Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” And for disagreeing with what The Prosecutors think is right. Meanwhile, one civil judge wants to put him in prison for “abetting” a felony offense that he has never named – hence, that his Grand Jury could never have known of. Meanwhile, another civil judge wants to declare him guilty of some “fraud” that his bankers know nothing of, and to shut down billion-dollar businesses just because of what His Honor thinks.
This has become a Constitutional issue. And also a civil absurdity. It is a broad abuse of prosecutorial power which should be resoundingly punished.
Absolutely.
American jurisprudence has become an absolute abomination.
I don’t think it matters if or when the supreme court rules on this, or even whether it gets to the court. Many say the process is the punishment but I think there is more to it. In the lefts zeal to retain power at any cost, they will just indict Trump on something else if this falls apart.
I believe the left believes that if Trump wins, ongoing investigations or trials will be the basis for leftist federal judges to rule that Trump can’t do anything that obstructs justice like replacing anyone remotely connected to any of the legal proceedings. The bureaucracy stays in place as long as they keep investigating or indicting.
Want to keep your job? Investigate or indict Trump on any little thing and make sure it is never resolved. Even a judge making one of these rulings would have to get to Supreme Court before anyone gets fired, and that is their tactic. It NEVER ends!
Likely so.
Nevertheless, we fight for PDJT, our only chance to rectify malicious prosecutions.
Furthermore, I consider that the Derp State must be destroyed.
“Do not worry!” – President Donald J. Trump
MAGA!
At this point, the Constitution is a deadletter. A scrap of paper. We’re in a new age of nihilism. The will to power is all that matters. Those that are ruthless, cunning and zealous are seizing power from those who are living in a world of nostalgia playing by rules that no longer exist. Until we wake up the masses and fight fire with fire, this evil will continue to metastisize and spread until we’re all consumed by it.
SCOTUS is going to step in on this as it is a clear attempt to encroach upon and usurp power and processes from the Executive Branch that are necessary for it to function properly in accordance with the Constitutional powers delegated to it.
This is all going to SCOTUS. The motions in this case will be timed to push any trial out well into next year. The appeals on her decisions will all, also, require time to be sorted out.
We’re all cynical about SCOTUS, but Pres. Trump has an absolutely fabulous record of winning at SCOTUS. Joe Biden has been b-slapped by the Court multiple times for doing things that are so patently unConstitutional and unAmerican that many of the votes have been 6-3 or worse for Biden.
The cases against Trump are far more dubious than even the eviction moratorium and the vaccine mandate…which themselves were stupid and unConstitutional.