Tucker Carlson interviews Capitol Hill Police Chief Steven Sund about the events that took place in Washington DC on January 6, 2021. {Direct Rumble Link}
Within the interview former Chief Sund notes there was extensive “chatter” intelligence gathered by Dept of Homeland Security (DHS), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and even the Defense Dept (DoD) about the potential for disturbance and possible violence on Capitol Hill. However, not a single briefing was ever conducted, and not a shred of documentation was created about the warnings to share with the Capitol Police.
Was the “chatter” real or was it self-created by political leadership in federal agencies, DHS, DoD and FBI, who were intent on using chaos to facilitate the goals and objectives of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. We have previously outlined the Pelosi motive and expand again below. The Tucker Carlson interview with Police Chief Sund puts those motives and outcomes into a new context. WATCH:
Within the questions: the FBI and government apparatus had advanced knowledge of the scale of the J6 mall assembly yet doing nothing? Why were the Capitol Hill police never informed of the FBI concerns? Why didn’t House Speaker Nancy Pelosi secure the Capitol Hill complex, and why did she deny the request by President Trump to call up the national guard for security support? Why did the FBI have agent provocateurs in the crowd, seemingly stimulating rage within a peaceful crowd to enter the Capitol building? There have always been these nagging questions around ‘why’?
Long time CTH reader “Regitiger” has spent a great deal of time reviewing the entire process, looking at the granular timeline and then overlaying the bigger picture of the constitutional and parliamentary process itself. What follows below is a brilliant analysis of the federal government motive to create a J6 crisis that permitted House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to trigger an emergency session and avoid the 2020 election certification challenges.
Those congressional floor challenges, known and anticipated well in advance of the morning of January 6, 2021, would have formed a legal and constitutional basis for ‘standing’ in judicial challenges that would have eventually reached the Supreme Court. The certification during “emergency session” eliminated the problem for Washington DC.
Regitiger explains below, only edited by me for clarity and context:
I think most, not all, but a large number of people, are totally missing what happened; and why this happened on Jan 6th. I am going to try my best to outline the events that day, blast past the commonly held assumptions and get right down to the core corruption.
I will present this as a series of questions and answers.
♦ Q1: How do you prevent congress from delaying the certification of state electoral votes?
A: It requires a crisis. A crisis that creates an “emergency” …An “emergency” that invokes special house rules.
FACTS: Remember carefully, focus please. Just moments, literally 3 minutes before two representatives issued a vote for motions to suspend the certification, the House members were “informed” by capitol police and other “agents” that a protest was about to breach the chambers. It was at this time that key people: Pence, Pelosi, Schumer, Mcconnell can be seen being walked out and escorted from the chamber. This effectively halted the Entire Chamber Process.
♦ Q2: Why was it necessary to halt the chamber process?
A: The crisis was created to eliminate the motion challenges to halt the certification and to begin voting to look into voting irregularities and fraud
FACTS: The two motions were completely legal and constitutional under at least two constitutionally recognized procedures… procedures that would REQUIRE the house to pause the certification and then vote to determine whether the motions of suspend could move forward.
♦ Q3: What was so important to refuse this motion and the subsequent votes to suspend the electoral certification?
A: It was important to remove that process entirely and continue the fraud and certify the fraud with no detractors on record. This effectively gives no standing for a SCOTUS ruling appeal! Understand this. If those two motions, even just one had successfully been voted EVEN IF THE MOTIONS were DENIED IN VOTE, this gives those who presented them with STANDING FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL LEGAL ARGUMENT BEFORE SCOTUS.
♦ Q4: Could this have been done some other way other than creating a crisis/protest?
A: Unlikely. In order to prevent those two motions, requires that speaker of the house, minority leaders, and the president of the congress (vice president of the United States: Pence), to NOT BE PRESENT IN THE CHAMBERS.
Once the capitol police and other “law enforcements agents” informed the speaker and these three other individuals, Pelosi UNILATERALLY UNDER EMERGENCY RULES, suspended the business of the congress. This protest was necessary. The crisis was created because there is no other way to suspend the business of certification UNILATERALLY. By creating a crisis invokes emergency procedures. No other circumstances other than war or mass simultaneous explosive diarrhea can create such unilateral speaker delivered suspension of the certification.
♦ Q5: Why did the motions, once that the speaker RECONVENED congress, move forward back again to the floor for votes? Why were members disallowed to even consider putting forward ANY motions to the floor in when the chamber business was reopened?
A: The Speaker initiated the NEW sessions under special emergency rules. These rules abandon and make it clear that the ONLY purpose of the new session was to EXPEDITE the certification and dismiss all prior regular session procedural rules. This is why those two motions to table votes to consider a debate and pause to the certifications of state vote electors never happened later that evening when the house business was reconvened!
♦ Q6: Other than new rules, emergency rules, what other peculiar things occurred when the speaker reconvened?
A: Members were allowed to “vote” in proxy, remotely, not being present. You can use your imagination about what conditions were placed on ALL members during this time to prevent anyone from “getting out of line”.
Also clearly, it was at THIS NEW SESSION that VP Pence, President of Congress, would also have no ability to even consider pausing the electoral certification, because there were no motions of disagreements on the matter. So, in a technical legal claim, he is correct that he had no constitutional authority to address any issues of fraud or doubts about electoral irregularities. But this completely dismisses the FACT that congress created rules in this crisis/emergency that never allowed them to be floored!
Understand what happened in Jan 6, 2021. Don’t get hung up on Viking impostors, stolen Pelosi computers, podium heists, and complicit capitol police. Understand the process and what happened and what WAS NOT ALLOWED TO HAPPEN.
This was a coup….it was a very organized and carefully planned coup. VP Pence without a doubt as well as most members of the house were quite aware of how the certification was going to be MANAGED. It would require new rules to prevent the debate clause from occurring! New rules that ONLY AN EMERGENCY CRISIS COULD CREATE! So, they created an emergency.
•NOTED: I understand why many people have great interest in debunking the j6 event. I get that. I think it is important to dissect and examine the events of that day but please, step back and understand WHY these things happened. Examine the chain of events in congress. Why those two motions that would have at least paused the certification THAT WOULD GIVE VP PENCE THE CONSTITUTIONALLY RECOGNIZED POWER TO MOVE TO SUSPEND THE ELECTORAL CERTIFICATION AND THEN EXAMINE THE IRREGULARITIES AND CLAIMS OF FRAUD!
At the very center of this coup stands Mike Pence, the same individual who also spoiled President Trump’s first opportunities in the earlies hours of his Presidency just 4 years prior, when he created and facilitated the removal of Lt General Michael Flynn. I will not spend much time on this thread explaining why Lt Gen Flynn was so important to President Trump and why the IC was so afraid he would have advisory power to the President. That I will leave for another day, another time. But understand this clearly: MIKE PENCE WAS AND IS WORKING FOR THE MOST CORRUPT CRIMINAL TREASONOUS PEOPLE IN GOVERNMENT.
•PRO TIP: If you really want to get a true understanding of this matter videos of protesters walking in the capitol is not going to address them. Actual video and timeline records of events and the specific actions taken by the speaker just moments before TWO MAJOR ELECTORAL ALTERING MOTIONS WERE ABOUT TO BE FLOORED.
This crisis was developed just in time with a precise coordination to prevent those two motions to be entered into the chamber record. The two motions do not exist. The emergency powers established in the new session made sure they never could be entered. The emergency powers could never happen without a crisis.
God Bless America!”
NOTE: “Under this scenario, the J6 pipe bombs were the insurance policy, in the event the feds couldn’t get the crowd to comply with the FBI provocations. If no one stormed the Capitol, the finding of the two pipe bombs would have then been the emergency needed to stop the process.” Which explains why the FBI has no interest in the DC pipe bomb suspects. ~ Sundance
Note from Author: “I started this effort years ago. To date, no one and I mean no one has replied. It’s as if everyone that can expose it that has a larger platform is either disinterested, or suspiciously withdrawn from the issue. I made several comments about this over the years right here at CTH, on article threads that are relevant to the topic.
I was watching the certification live that day. I recorded it ALL on every channel. I was doing this because no matter what happened that day, I KNEW IT WOULD BE A PROFOUND AND SIGNIFICANT EVENT TO REMEMBER. I never in my wildest imagination (and I have a pretty vivid imagination, always have), expected to see the unmistakable perfectly timed “coincidences” that occurred.
One member raises a motion (with another in waiting for his turn) those two motions were well known and advertised. These were motions to vote for a pause in the certification to examine electoral vote fraud and irregularities. I can’t speak to the veracity and substance of those motions. They were never allowed to even be floored. it was at that exact moment that the house chambers were suspended and 4 of the key members, Pence, Pelosi, Schumer and McConnell were escorted OUT right after initiating the end of the session.
Effectively, this resulted in that motion never being floored at all. Then, when reconvened under special emergency rules, inexplicably those two motions (and perhaps more – we will never know – or will we?) were not even attempted to be motioned. That was not just peculiar to me.
It all started to make more sense when I did some study on constitutional law AND THE HISTORY of specific special authorities given to president of the congress, Pence in this case. Not only did he have the authority and power to suspend the certification, but the duty to address the motion in the same sense that it becomes vital to the debate clause.
There really is no higher significance of weight given to the debate clause than the certification of the votes. This was more than odd to me the way that the media and pence framed their narrative: Pence would not have the constitutional power to suspend certification. Then it hit me, like the obvious clue that was there all the time. He was right. But the reason he is right, is because there WAS NO MOTION ON THE FLOOR TO CAUSE HIM TO SUSPEND!
Understanding this, happened for me about 4 or 5 months after this Jan 6 day. I took me this long to examine the facts, look at the video again, compare it to the arguments made by several leading constitutional academics, and again, inexplicably even some that I respect seemed to dodge that central reality. The motions were never allowed to be floored in the re-convened house rules later that evening. Most would not even venture to address the exotically coincidence that the moment those two members would stand to place the motion before the house, that the House Speaker Pelosi AND Pence ended the session, effectively blocking the motions from being heard in normal house rules.
It’s been a journey for me. A journey that was initiated because I am just a simple but curious person. Perhaps even to a point where I get obsessive in those efforts. Many days and nights combing over the details. praying and trying to make sense of what makes little sense. With over 6 states having serious well known and obvious defects in the voting process, some more credible to believe – some less, but one would not expect the house would be so deliberate in marching past the motions that were definitely going to be present to slow this process down and take the time to get it right. Even IF the claims never reached an intersection that would change the outcome.
There are two possibilities: Millions of people, against all the odds, hitting all-time records even past Obama and Clinton, voted for a naval gazing ambulatory pathological racist moron. And chose Joe Malarkey as their leader. Or this was a coup, a conspiracy, and a treasonous manipulation regime change because President Trump could not be controlled by the deep state and globalists who OWN AND OPERATE WASHINGTON DC.
BOTH POSSIBILITIES ARE TERRIFYING.
The only way for THE PEOPLE to gain power in this country is to force the transfer of it. If truth isn’t the fuel and vehicle, we will just be replacing deck chairs and hitting the next series of expected ice bergs.
Knowing the truth is not enough; however, it is truth that makes it a righteous cause.
God Bless America!”
Sundance provides an addendum in support:
Julie Kelly – […] Just as the first wave of protesters breached the building shortly after 2 p.m., congressional Republicans were poised to present evidence of rampant voting fraud in the 2020 presidential election. Ten incumbent and four newly-elected Republican senators planned to work with their House colleagues to demand the formation of an audit commission to investigate election “irregularities” in the 2020 election. Absent an audit, the group of senators, including Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) pledged to reject the Electoral College results from the disputed states.
The Hail Mary effort was doomed to fail; yet the American people would have heard hours of debate related to provable election fraud over the course of the day.
And no one opposed the effort more than ex-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).
During a conference call on December 31, 2020, McConnell urged his Republican Senate colleagues to abandon plans to object to the certification, insisting his vote to certify the 2020 election results would be “the most consequential I have ever cast” in his 36-year Senate career.
From the Senate floor on the afternoon of January 6, McConnell gave a dramatic speech warning of the dire consequences to the country should Republicans succeed in delaying the vote. He downplayed examples of voting fraud and even mocked the fact that Trump-appointed judges rejected election lawsuits.
“The voters, the courts, and the States have all spoken,” McConnell insisted. “If we overrule them, it would damage our Republic forever. If this election were overturned by mere allegations from the losing side, our democracy would enter a death spiral.”
Roughly six hours later, McConnell got his way. Cowed by the crowd of largely peaceful Americans allowed into the building by Capitol police, most Republican senators backed off the audit proposal. McConnell, echoing hyperbolic talking points about an “insurrection” seeded earlier in the day by Democratic lawmakers and the news media, gloated. “They tried to disrupt our democracy,” he declared on the Senate floor after Congress reconvened around 8 p.m. “This failed attempt to obstruct Congress, this failed insurrection, only underscores how crucial the task before us is for our Republic.”
Congress officially certified the Electoral College results early the next day. (read more)
Who is in charge of the Capitol Police? Why, the Speaker of the House, Ms. Lube Rack Nan Pelotsy. She could have gotten more police (the Capitol Police have over 1000 on staff), but she turned extra help down. Why? She wanted a “crisis.” I would love to see her commands to the police– let them in. Open the doors for them. Why? To entrap them legally.
Jan. 6 the day the u.s. government finished stealing the election from the American People.
when J6 happened LIHOP MIHOP, and saw the transparent insider manipulations
I said, now I know how 911 happened: LIHOP/MIHOP
so several notes:
is it lawful for FBI to “listen to chatter”…is this social media chatter. or is this private phone and text messages? Was there a warrant issued? at any time, before, during or after? Remember, there was a massive vacuum of all method of communication and geo location data AS THE EVEN UNFOLDED. This is surveillance. It’s not targeted surveillance. How was it accomplished, under what legal authority? Did the ISP’s and tech companies managing apps and phone api’s receive NSL letters?
Chatter is vague. It does not describe criminal intent or activity. “I just heard some chatter over at the walmart”…so what. What was the intent of the chatter? see the problem. How does ONE KNOW that chatter even happened, if there was not spying taking place. How does one gain access to know the difference between anger and criminal intent…state of mind…(hello james “we cannot prove intent”). So upon what predicate did this spying happen and how did the chatter get separated from cases of just pure dissatisfaction and voices that called for a protest against those voices and “chatter” that could be described as dangerous and with purpose to do harm or to commit crime?
see the problem.
this was all debated in various ways IN CONGRESS when the patriot act was being discussed…it was not just a rubber stamp approval to sweep up all communications AGAINST US CITIZENS . It WAS NEVER INTENDED TO BE THAT> the secret police state hacked these laws and argued IN SECRET that exception could be made. This is where the discussion take a hard left …that AMERICAN CITIZENS could be searched without cause if there was even a hint of suspicion…under the strained legal definitions of terrorism. This is a dubious interpretation and unfortunately this slow creep and first and then the race to power happened suddenly…where congress finds itself reauthorizing these powers with no reforms for many years…and that is how we got here.
see, the problem isn’t just that the FBI has abused the law., it’s that congress has not acted to reign it in and reform the law to eliminate authorities such as 702. and many parts of the usa freedom act (formerly known as the patriot act).
there is a renewed interest in congress to make reforms and possibly even abolishment of the 702 THIS YEAR…31 DEC 2023 is the deadline. Congress has a dog in this fight now. the DOJ and FBI have targeted elections…ordinary citizens…that’s US. you and me. But congress now understands that DOJ and FBI are coming after THEM. and that is what makes this a political issue..it’s power. the power to take away the one thing that the FBI and DOJ has used and will continue to use to go after political enemies…to manufacture evidence and get unlawful spying warrants. and even spying with no warrant at all. (say hello to the billions spent by the NSA/CIA/FBI/DOJ/DOD/STATE DEPT buying data from open source…in secret of course…this is your tax payers dollars btw…Billions spent collecting sifting through with zero controls and no oversight. what do you think they are doing with that data? making paper airplanes? wasting money.. No…this data is POWER…it is intel. it allows these corrupt people access to nearly everything…how to invest ahead of the curve…when to short a stock…what group to attack and smear…what legal defense is doing in preparation for a case…how congress is acting in debate about various laws…how to compromise judges…prosecutors…defendant attorneys. you name it…if you have this kind of data…you have power…and it’s very effective…This must end. We have a secret police spy state that can control everything in this control for any reason and agenda it so choices,…all the way to stealing elections…to targeting parents who just want schools to stop indoctrinating their children with perverse ideas and give them a chance in real education so they can be competitive.
Congress will not act without the political will to do so. This is YOUR OPPORTUNITY to communicate what you think about 702 and the usa freedom act. This year. Take this opportunity and talk to your members of congress..they work for you..never forget that. Make them understand the stakes…that you will support them if they are attacked …but that you will not support them if they fail to act.
it’s just that simple.
we have a nation to save.
when is now?
God Bless America
Chatter could also mean internal amongst themselves about what they are observing.
it’s unlikely (but possible). Court discovery of any claim of “chatter” that could lead back to a fbi/cia asset would be avoided. so that’s unlikely to be presented as case material evidence. it WAS however most likely USED to develop warrant to spy and to investigate (if warrant were even issued, a question I still have trouble solving..due to the wide sweeping collection that happened on that day…which isn’t normal or lawful by any stretch)
so even if we skip past how they “collected”, we are still at the key question: did the “chatter” elevate to a criminal intent? was there any crimes that followed “chatter”?
anyway, I don’t want to get hung up on chatter too much..the j6 protester are on trial, many in jail and we need to inspect every area of how prosecutors gathered evidence to use against them and then examine if warrants were issued and specific WITH A PREDICATE.
chatter is not predicate..it’s might be legal for the US to USE CHATTER for foreign NON US CITIZEN IN NON US SOIL..but that is NOT LEGAL here in the US. even if the courts “allowed” it.
if we allow these j6 protesters to be subject to unlawful search we are all targets for any “chatter” we might have.
and that IS the point.
God Bless America
chatter, as in they are reading your DMS, text messages, phone calls, social media posts and DMs, private messages via messaging apps
ALL of it, the laws have changed
they changed the surveillance laws so they can read your DMs, now they can deplatform you, they dont need you to post your inner most thoughts online, they can listen to your personal conversations
hell, they are probably listening to you via your phone even when not DM’ing
or planning !!!
Thank you again regitiger!
“…congress to make reforms and possibly even abolishment of the 702 THIS YEAR…31 DEC 2023 is the deadline. Congress has a dog in this fight now. the DOJ and FBI have targeted elections…ordinary citizens…that’s US. you and me. But congress now understands that DOJ and FBI are coming after THEM….”
“…This is YOUR OPPORTUNITY to communicate what you think about 702 and the usa freedom act. This year. Take this opportunity and talk to your members of congress..they work for you..never forget that. Make them understand the stakes…that you will support them if they are attacked …but that you will not support them if they fail to act….”
Very clear action item for all Treepers! Thank you!
Regitiger: Do any of the revelations in this interview change or enhance your parliamentary maneuver thesis (which is excellent, by the way)?
Just curious….
The methods (I have chosen.noting: anyone can choose to apply methods of their own, so this is just how I am doing it…remembering: this IS a work incomplete…unfinished)…is simply this:
I want to hear from specific congressional members, in interviews to understand several keys issues:
who was prepared to floor motions to debate in the regular session before the “crisis”
who was controlling the debate clause rules in the special session?
what negotiations happened that caused the house to certify without a debate? was this normal rules adopted PRE CRISIS..or rules established under CRISIS “special” session?
who withdrew motions to debate irregularities?
I am pretty sure we are never going to get that interview or a straight answer. I know there are some questions about my theories and some minor mistakes called out by several people who have scrutinized what I have written. I am not opposed to that criticism. I would just answer to those serious minded criticism the following:
no debates happened to investigate irregularities. Yes, there were motions that were approved, but the VOTES required to get actual debates on these issues never happened. The critical aspect of addressing irregularities were “handled” in a brief, urgent, directed and shaped manner to certify the election in the broken and obviously broken condition it was presented to congress! Accept that as the reality. This was the outcome. If there were mistakes I have made about motions being floored, I admit those mistakes. This does NOT however cloud the issue of what DID NOT HAPPEN ON THAT DAY. And I stand by that critically important truth – congress did not act to deliberate carefully and handle with good faith the many aspects of voting fraud and irregularity. There were literally dozens, perhaps even hundreds of examples of it.
whether this would have overturned the election I have no idea. And this is why I consider mike DENSE to be a fraud. he has used that over and over and over as some argument why he “had no power”. That is nonsense and it’s time people stop pretending it’s not. he will never admit it, but clearly, historically, constitutionally the president of the senate (thank you treepers for correcting my mistake about his proper title), mike DENSE did have the power. his power was to halt the certification and take a pause and then open the floor for debate to consider each argument for and against irregularities and fraud…His duty should have been…IN MY OPINION…to send this entire matter BACK TO THE STATES. (eastman and several others had advised President Trump about this power and that is most likely what he discussed with Mike DENSE…not intimidation, or threat, but to inform MIKE DENSE of his options under his special power as president of the senate).
would it have gone to scotus.?..most certainly…just like the hanging chads in 2000…but very different than voting cards marking errors and reading errors…there were thousands of issues in almost every single state.
this was a moment in time when congress and the president of the senate could have taken the responsibility and the leadership to recognize widespread problems that were not properly solved before the certification. That this responsibility is not a political duty, but one that could have had the result of creating MORE TRUST in congress about elections…and placing the burden BACK TO THE STATES where these matters would need to be resettled before congress could simply rubber stamp them.
Jan 20 is when presidents are sworn in. january 6th is certification by congress and 14 days before that. (the former actually holds power until midnight on the 20th and when it transfers earlier to the newly inaugurated president usually at noon) There was time. 2 weeks to get this right. To at least TRY to restore some confidence that the election was proper and that fraud DID NOT OCCUR and then to inspect for it and have the states consider changes to election law and process to eliminate the gaps that we all saw with our own eyes!)
it would have also given states another shot at arguments in court that until that moment were obviously not being handled correctly. And some, cases that were denied by courts to even put on schedule. standing…jurisdiction issues…bad interpretations of how state constitutional election laws could be exempted by “health emergency”…mail in ballots…drop ballot boxes…muling..stuffing…issues over chain of custody…fraud with signatures and addresses…the whole enchilada. not all of that was handled correctly by state courts. Congress KNEW THIS.
on the matter of how embeds in the j6 crowd from the secret police spy state, yes it is crucial to understand those covert operations were established to create “insurance” policies that if the crowd did not break law, then the secret police spy state would make sure there were claims of “insurrection”…a narrative was established and plans for a riot were already put in place well before j6. And this was not some random disorganized civilian mob. This was specific events and people who were organized to do one thing: create a riot and incite violence and law breaking. This elevated the hysteria of that day and did in fact influence the decisions of congress to do exactly what they had planned on doing: rubber stamp a fraudulent election and help steal the power from THE PEOPLE to install a navel gazing ambulatory senile pathological grifting embecile. They knew that they could never control the PEOPLE’S PRESIDENT TRUMP. So they refused to act to address the election fraud and rubber stamped joe malarkey into the white house.
ALL THE PRETENDING we see now about how shocked these same members of congress are about joe malarkey being a fool and a diminished old crook and how poorly he has managed the national security and economy (is there a difference?) is shocking to witness. Remember these are not aliens from mars…they lived on earth just like me and you and 333 million others and there is no doubts they understood the hundreds and thousands of election irregularities and unconstitutional measures that were made to put joe malarkey over the line. Were these people asleep and did not witness this joe malarkey hit the highest records ever in votes over obama and hillary and managed to do that from his basement. a guy who never drew a crowd over 2,000 at any of his campaign events. An idiot who was clobbered masterfully by President Trump in every televised debate?
of course not. These members of congress were FULLY AWARE that joe malarkey could not have possibly gotten this number of votes. But they went along with it…and are now complaining…pretending is the better word.
this is the enemy we face..understand the corruption…it’s deep to the bone in DC.
if the secret police spy state wants to make a king, congress will agree…not matter what the consequences are to THE PEOPLE.
God Bless America
Regitiger … Did Louisiana Senator John Kennedy call President Trump and suggest January 6th as a good date for the Trump Rally ?
Thank you for your excellent work.
I have no knowledge of that specifically. But I would not be surprised that Senator Kennedy was fully engaged with President Trump about what the constitutional options could be and how to advise VP MIKE DENSE given it was going to be election fraud after each state certified after the end of november for most, and for 14 states around the middle of December. Anyone with a eye on the ball, could anticipate a showdown in congress.
I did the best I could. I know others did as well. We were not expecting congress to take these irregularities and evidence of fraud and dismiss them so easily. Perhaps we expected more of mike dense and members of congress. It’s obvious that we had no idea the scale of manipulations and procedural potomac two steps that would take place. We expected honorable people to act honorably in a time of great controversy.
we did not expect congress to allow the fraud with a rubber stamp. We expected SO AMOUNT OF FIGHT, and there was none. Just a few minor arm waving and strong words.. Congress and specifically mike dense failed at leadership. The plan, the correct course of action, was to suspend the election certification, and send these matters back to controversy states and let them deal with it. There was time. 14 days. Would it have changed the election? I do not know the answer to that question. But it would have been the correct choice and for the right reasons. instead congress marched headstrong and creating the conditions we live in right now: an embecile certified with evidence of fraud that selected him as the white house squatter…and probably just as impactful…a complete withdrawal of any kind of confidence in the election system by American Citizens. Which is by far, the absolutely most crucial foundation of our society: that we trust…that we believe that our votes were counted correctly and that a president assumes power with no controversies about the manner in which he gained that power.
I was disgusting on january 6th in ways I could not even imagine possible. I realized on that day, this was in fact a coup and not just some series of coincidence: bioweapon, lockdown, mail ins, and election system irregularities…I was not totally convinced those events were planned and coordinated. On january 6th, the rubber stamp to approve of the fraud, without even level of debate of any meaning and substance or even a call to suspend and send back to the states was my heavy black pill day. It was the conclusive reality that we are in fact asking the wrong people to fix problems.
God Bless America
Outstanding Retitiger!!! Perhaps take a look into “THE COMMITTEE OF 300” – a group of powerful and wealthy families who are the puppet masters behind the entire charade.
Dr. John Coleman wrote a book on them and predicted all of these outcomes in 1994 – this lecture gives us many insights:
To my ear, the PTB selected the term “chatter” for two specific purposes:
1 – Plausible deniability of their complicity in the planned action, as that becomes circumstantially evident from emerging bits and pieces of their own communications.
2 – An allusion to professional monitoring of diverse, if disparate intelligence including “sources and methods” that we can’t always discuss – wink. “The Smartest Man In The Room” isn’t telling you everything; so sit down, shut up and be happy with what he gives you.
So, let’s review that pre-9/11 “chatter” while we’re at it…
My 2 cents.
Brilliant work, regitiger. A keeper, for sure.
ALL these big events have a similar orchestrated nature, the state manipulates left and right against each other in a divide and rule
of course the feds where in there, perhaps even controlling some factions, groups, networks. Others where purely false flag; Antifa dressed as Vanilla MAGA ISIS
what the Deep State and the Illegal Republic wanted was blood on the streets, full-tilt street fighting/insurgency like they managed to create in Genoa in 2000 which would completely destroy the MAGA brand for ever
watch and weap, I would say this is the moment when the honest anti-globalization movements where destroyed and then coopted by Obama many years later after many years in the wilderness and are now left fascist Pinktertons
So you’re right, but it is something I hate to even admit is true. It makes me sick. What the f$&# has happened to politicians, the military, and high ranking officials who would go along with this? For surely they saw what was happening. Bill Barr, the FBI, and General Milley and the Joint Chiefs are much worse than I thought. I always thought military intelligence would catch the vote fraud.
Even when Rome was in decline there were still noble Romans who stood up to tyranny.
your NSA and CIAand FBI cant prevent coups on the Presidency? then what are good are they.
What good is our military if it cannot defend our borders?
Prevent? They are the ones who perpetrated the coup!
Exactly. All the branches, all of the agencies, have acquired the DC rot. Who isn’t compromised? That individual would be very rare indeed.
Thank Obama . He fired and retired all the patriots
Yep. He fired most of the upper echelons of military leadership and it was never noticed by the press.
Oh, they noticed. They just made sure it was never reported to the public.
And the forced vaxx, and threat of forced vaxx finished the job; a brain drain of right thinking individuals from all sectors of the government and the economy.
Politician should be a four-letter word.
Isn’t it among really smart people?
Money, money, money!
Cruz and Kelly need to be asked (Loomer Style if need be) why their debate they introduced didnt happen.
They can’t say I dunno.
Cruz is the best one. cause he is in a Red state, and more pressure on him
He’s a two-faced snake.
The question needs to be worded such that it cannot be weaseled out of similar to what Pence is doing.
“Were there objections to accepting electoral votes from certain states, and if there were, why was no action taken to hear those objections?”
then saying, because the Floor was under attack isnt good enough.
why not for something this decisive in our country, resolve the emergency and start back normal order after its all clear. that day, next day, by proxy, or even using the COVID by phone meetings they so love.
Sundance, Could you get Tucker to read the articles written by Regitiger. His action or no action would be interesting.
If he or his people don’t read here he ain’t half as smart as he’s made out to be.
They read here daily. Lots of outlets do. Someone on the Oliver Anthony thread just got quoted in the Daily News this morning, without proper citation of course.
They would never have gotten away with this s*&! had RUSH still been with US.
Coup
OK, this is significant clarification and I believe needs to be highlighted within Regitigers write-up, or at least clarified at the end.
As I commented in another thread, I have been posting links to this explanation elsewhere, including Pence’s Twitter response when he’s tweeting self-righteously. Yesterday, some leftist responded saying votes were held for PA and AZ in both the House and Senate, and objections were rejected by both. The response contained links to C-span videos with text from C-span which is not always clear.
Objections were NOT rejected. The C-span videos are to up or down votes to accept the electoral votes from those states.
Text from C-span describing one of the videos makes clear it took place when they reconvened….which means they reconvened under the new rules. The new rules allowed for an up or down vote, but no other motions.
Yes, votes were held on whether to accept the electoral votes from states.
NO. No other motions were allowed during this session under the rules, so no motion to halt certification, and no motion to look into vote fraud as explained in answer to Q2.
“eliminate the motion challenges to halt the certification and to begin voting to look into voting irregularities and fraud”
We need to be aware people believe objections were heard and voted down when in fact, no objections were heard and no debate was held. They simply held votes to accept or reject electoral votes.
So they are conflating the normal certification process with objections to that process due to irregularities.
About as disingenuous as saying 60 courts rejected election fraud claims when in reality they refused to hear them.
If they start producing falsehoods that are clearly targeted on truths only found here we’ll know they are spinning this.
Conservatives need to COMPLETELY understand the Electoral College process before the next election because the Dems will attempt to screw OUR PRESIDENT TRUMP and US again
What ever happen to Chris Miller? You know, the guy out inspecting military bases when this all when down?
🤫Trust the plan, Sir Francis.
Excellent compilation of the primary facts and triggers! I truly thank all who worked to put this together! It must be used to expand the narrative and make the case before the election. And we must let every representative know we are on to the game and will hold them accountable!
God bless America, and preserve her!
This really is quite good; exceptional to be more precise. I do have a thought that runs contrary to the point that objections can be raised to the counting of certificates for President and Vice President. Article II section I of our Constitution says that -certified lists of votes by the electors- ” transmit sealed to the Seat of the Government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the Presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the Certificates, and the Votes shall then be counted”. I can see where the “in the presence of the Senate and House” is where the diversion was concocted to not meet that requirement; to get either house out of the proceeding but the words “shall” in regards to opening and counting, imho, leave no room for debate about the certificates, as the electors have already certified them. Elections for their own houses can be debated as per Article I section 5 because the people have sent their choice. Their is a distinction between how we choose the executive (electors) and the Congress (people); otherwise it wouldn’t be delineated that way in our Constitution. I don’t see where house or senate rules override Article II section I, as it pertains to “shall” open/count. If I’m missing something, my humble apologies, but this is how I see it.
The emergency rules Pelosi imposed had been carefully crafted in advance to not permit the kinds of motions that would be required in order to present and advance the objections and or alternate slates of electors.
I do not have the verbiage, and can only hope Pepe is busy working his way into the House to obtain copies for us, but as Regitiger explained it this was the one critical move, simply to prevent the kind of parliamentary procedures that had been planned by Representatives that knew their states had done America wrong, by implementing “emergency rules,” despite she being the actual emergency.
Thanks Maquis. My main point is that congress is not allowed to object via any procedure for this process. I can see where the disruption to the ” in the presence of” can be gamed and delay the process but ever changing congressional rules don’t override assertive statements such as ” shall open all and shall count” . This leaves no room for debate by either house, imho.
I am putting a placeholder here as a reminder (for me and you) to comm again on this subject. Short spoiler: yes, the constitution AND LAW allows the debate clause FOR ANY SESSION. It has not higher meaning and purpose than the matters involving ELECTION OF A PRESIDENT. It is NOT a rubber stamp, NOR is it a ceremonial ornament. I will provide you with historial evidence and proper citations so that you and others can see how this was handled in the past and also upon what constitutional law it tracks. What happened on j6 wasn’t just irregular, but was an intentional refusal to perform this duty by altering the rules of the house (and possibly the senate – separate sessions were conducted), such that motions to vote to debate would never reach the thresholds to suspend the election…there was one person however, WHO HAD THE POWER AND THE EXCLUSIVE AUTHORITY TO OVERRULE THESE PROCEDURAL WALLS: Mike DENSE, VP and President of the senate.
God Bless America
Well this was a late evening dose of things to think about. Not sure if this post was attached to the Tucker interview. Seems that it was.
Thank you so greatly for your excellent and informing facts/thoughts on this @ Regitior. Excellent. And Sundance for posting it.
Still wondering where I read that the evacuation of Congress “for their safety, ” also managed, due to the delay, to render “mute” a case before the Supreme Court that Trump had brought re the vote.
Whatever anger I have since Jan 5 has not been muted.
I’ve been around you know? At this point in time I have no good thoughts re the perpetrators (supposed leaders of our country) believe they have accomplished by overthrowing the ways, rules, and means of an election.
My country and my heart has been broken over the overthrow of the US govmint by politicians who would be ashamed if they were shown with their false teeth taken out , showered with no makeup, fancy clothes and hairdo’s. Let alone their false income tax returns.
It doens’t take a genius to to know what they are all about. Four letter and five letter words.
Nonetheless, I am old enough to remember the National Guard shooting and killing students at Kent State University.
PROTEST NO LONGER SHEEPLE, Is the message from them. Oh sure, like that is going to happen. I would have rather posted Led Zeppelin “Swinging from the Gallows Pole” song, but I hope this suffices. Yes, the US does shoot their own citizens who protest:
Ohio:
Communist Agitators got those college kids shot to use them as props to secure a Communist victory in Vietnam.
Just like Mayor Bowser told BLM rioters that the Trumps were all alone and defenseless at the White House.
Tin Soldiers and Biden’s coming.
SO WHO IS LYING or HAS FORMER Capitol Hill Police Chief Steven Sund BEEN PLAYED ?
Steven Sund WAS NOT a ” HANDS ON ” LEADER and MAYBE played by BEING ISOLATED OUT.
The Officer in the Video TALKING / Taking the SELFIE WEARS A CAPITAL POLICE BADGE with the Last Numbers on the Badge being –25
( Enlarge a Screen Capture and SEE the EMBOSSED Capital on the Badge and the Number )
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/breaking-video-dc-police-officer-admitting-when-we/
“I am just a simple but curious person”
-Regititer
“I have no special talents. I I am only passionately curious”
-Einstein
Pelosi AND Pence ended the session.
Some days I think Pence is jut slow, other days I think he’s been bought.
Either way, he has no balls.
The fly knew.
He’s bought and blackmailed. The fly doesn’t lie
Two Republicans really stand out the day after the Congressional Coup, Ted Cruz and Nikki Haley. Both could not wait to throw President Trump under the bus by blaming everything that happened on January 6, 2021, on President Trump alone. Without any evidence, without any proof, the great Supreme Court bloviator, who owes President Trump for carrying his worthless butt to victory over Beto O’Rourke, and Nikki Haley also owes President Trump for helping her remain in politics by giving her the Ambassadorship to the United Nations. Both showed their disloyal, backstabbing, untrustworthy natures, and hatred for President Trump. I really despise both of them for what they did. There are a lot of people in Congress that day, who should have been hung for treason, in my humble opinion. But we no longer have fair and equal justice in this Country anymore, no fair elections, and no observing and honoring of the Constitution and Bill of Rights. So, what did you expect would happen?
This should be entered into evidence at President Trump’s farce of a trial in DC.
Everyone please spread this far and wide. The analysis is a megaton bomb
They fired ticket to prevent this interview.
Please share the link to this excellent report to everyone you can.
Just more confirmation of what we have all known. Just like the Muskegon, MI vote fraud was more evidence of what we have all known. What is it going to change?
Will imprisoned J6ers who did nothing violent be released? Will the DOJ and GA call off their J6 indictments against PDJT? Will the election results be set straight?
Yes, the interview was astounding. An inside glimpse at how well orchestrated the entire J6 debacle was. Just as 2,000 Mules was an incredible look into some of the mechanisms on how the election fraud was pulled off.
In the end it all reinforces the death grip of control, the matrix-like control the government has over major functions, assemblies of tens of thousands to tens of million of Americans and the desired outcome they want from those assemblies. Why should anyone miss Hollywood over the strike when the largest production takes place every day right before our eyes, in the newspapers, on TV and throughout the hallways and backrooms of DC.
The differences between Hollywood productions and DC productions are these. Hollywood productions are fake, fantasy, meaningless. The DC productions are very real and they impact our lives in nearly everything we do, every single day; the desired outcomes they want. Worse, Hollywood productions can be turned off.
Get closer to God. In Jesus name, Amen!
But Hollywood can, and sometimes does, produce things such as this, and more.
They had a hand in the production of the J6 Commission.
I’m sorry, I’d like to engage with you on this one but I can’t compare a single movie, or even the sum of all movies, that changed the course of history nearing anything remotely close to the order of magnitude such as the impact of 2020 election on nearly every aspect of our daily lives. While I understand influence and propaganda wings of the government, I would never confuse their roles with what government actually does. But I see other fish nibbling on your line so I’ll leave you all to yourselves on this one.
God bless!
Hollywood is a subsidiary of those who own DC. They partner on special projects like the moon landing. They push narratives to soften resistance to cabal initiatives.
No One would have entered the capital without the FBI busting through windows and Capital police opening the doors of the Capital. Pelosi and McConnel MUST be interviewed under Oath.( Means NOTHING to them) They and others should be found guilty and given to the people of the USA for punishment.
A massive stoning event
Keep it going long after their lifeless bodies are on the ground. They are evil and evil must be dealt with
absent the J6 protesters running through (and damaging) the Capitol Building this would have been a dramatically more difficult scam to pull off. They were an essential part of the plan. The pipe bombs ruse would have come under much more intense scrutiny. As it turned out they were a quickly and purposefully forgotten footnote to the main event.
Washington DC needs our money to accomplish the underhanded things the have done for decades. Agencies and their funding MUST be abolished. Military MUST be audited every day and published on the internet. Uncover Black ops. DISOLVE the FIB . The US Marshals and LLEA can do that job with their funding. Treat ANYONE involved with the destruction the same way as they have treated the J-6 defendants., with NO MERCY
I was waiting for a question regarding the the some of the members of the Capitol police – Byrd, the 3 that testified for the fake J5 committee. He kept talking about how proud he is of the Capitol police yet ignores the actions of some. I also have heard Chris Miller, the acting head of the Pentagon and he & Kash Patel say that National Guard were requested at least 2 weeks in advance. Seems to me this chief was indicating Miller was involved in the conspiracy when I see it as Milley being the traitor to this country.
Just seems like this chief has a narrow conversation on this event.
Trump could have activated the DC Guard and deployed it if he deemed it necessary. Just go to Google and put it in Search—Who can Deploy the DC National Guard?—Get ready to be surprised.
“Every leader in the D.C. Guard wanted to respond and knew they could respond to the riot at the seat of government” before they were given clearance to do so on Jan. 6, Matthews’ memo reads. Instead, he said, D.C. guard officials “set [sic] stunned watching in the Armory” during the first hours of the attack on Congress during its certification of the 2020 election results.
POLITICO–https://www.politico.com/news/2021/12/06/jan-6-generals-lied-ex-dc-guard-official-523777
Why would Federal authorities hold briefings regard self generated chatter about their own operation? Chaos would enhance the effect of the operation.
He is still mired in denial. He still thinks that this was genuine, just not well handled. This was not real, buddy. Wake up!
After watching the interview with Chief Sund what struck me the most was the sheer scale of this coup. The incredible depth and breadth of this operation boggles my mind even now. There was almost NO part of our government that wasn’t involved in one way or another, it was a vast and well coordinated conspiracy to put an end to DJT.
In my estimation the “chatter” that they’re talking about was most likely self generated by the FBI’s own undercover agents. They had already infiltrated multiple organizations and it would be an easy matter to for them to create and capture any type of communications they desired whether by legal or illegal means.
The FBI’s long standing partnership with antifa and blm provided them with the necessary “muscle” to help incite and move the crowds in any direction they wished. Couple that with compliant police officers within the Capitol police up to and including Sund’s own second in command and you have the makings of a successful color revolution.
It’s not just the level of corruption that beggars belief, it’s the all encompassing nature of this beast that astounds me.
The FBI doesn’t have a partnership with ANTIFA. ANTIFA is part of the FBI. With the doggedly persistent persecution of J6 attendees, the FBI illustrates they have the capacity to get ANTIFA, traffickers, BLM agitators, yet they do not. The answer should be obvious now.
Amen. It started years prior and is ongoing to this day. Understand the relentlessness, persistence of the entire operation over the period of years it has been ongoing and all it encompasses. From Russiagate and Mueller through the stolen 2018 House to impeachments, to the release of covid and shutting down the global economy to the 2020 heist, J6 and now multiple indictments.
Yes, Midnite, it does boggle the mind of mere humans. But in the eyes of God they are naked and fully visible. God bless.
The purpose of having this riot take place include:
l. There was low probability of serious property damage in letting those who attended the rally into the Capitol.
2.There was low probability of high police casualties in a riot in which the rioters consist mainly of the people who attended the rally.
3.In exchange for low risk “event” like that, the Uniparty comes close to making it a crime to:
A. Question any election that is won by a Democrat
B. Belong to any movement that challenges any narrative put forth by the Uniparty.
C. To support Trump after his supporters become potential insurrectionists and/or Domestic Terrorists.
It’s a no-brainer you do it if you are them.
What actionable intelligence prompted the need to turn DC into a fortress on Jan 20 following Jan 6 debacle. Were there actual threats, or was it all part of the show? Talk about not liking “the optics.”
More optics: deployed land based minuteman missiles around DC/Virginia. Mobilized as a threat to the States. They were flexing. Remember USA does not have a nuclear arsenal, Washington DC does. Not well publicized, but if you look, you can fund it.
It’s obvious J6 was a setup just like the RUSSIAN HOAX! Just more democrat LAWFARE!
WHY is America overlooking the most obvious form of election interference that’s common throughout the world and throughout history: POLITICAL PROSECUTION? Between political prosecution, violating FEDERAL ELECTION LAWS, a corrupt media and communist democrat party ELECTION FRAUD, ELECTION INTEGRITY is ZERO! POLITICAL PROSECUTION VIOLATES the HATCH ACT – a federal law. ELECTION LAWS are being VIOLATED every election, yet the JUDICIAL SYSTEM DOES NOTHING! America has become a nation of COWARDS and USURPERS against American citizens. When the judicial system goes ROGUE, they too must be destroyed. VOTE THEM ALL OUT!
Thank you for posting this interview and analysis Sundance. Quite remarkable how purposeful the events of January 6th were. How tragic for the republic. Remember folks, we are America, we are not the government. Just like the Chinese people are not the CCP.
Option 3: The fraud is deliberately being allowed in a BIG picture way to expose and eventually end this massive corrupt takeover of the US gov once and for all.. Good v evil forces at play these days….Sounds incredible, I know
After watching Sund’s interview with Tucker I downloaded his book. I haven’t read much of it yet, but just what I have read makes it clear that he is characterizing the J6 event as some kind of catastrophic criminal, terroristic attack on the Capitol on the order of 9/11. This is in direct contradiction to the videos I’ve seen – on Tucker’s show – that show it as a big nothingburger. While I appreciate Sund putting the blame on Pelosi, if he’s going to create a narrative that it was a scary, dangerous, violent terrorist-type attack, I really can’t take anything else he says seriously.
I can understand your point of view. Well stated. Personally I appreciate his testimonial for the manner in which he helps to prove what we all know. The refusal to include the NG up front was clearly intentional so as to facilitate the rest of the production.
Since he does come off as apolitical, I can cut him some slack. But your take is valid and noted. That is a really good share and food for thought. God Bless.
No motions of that kind can be brought to the floor of that Joint Session of Congress. Only motions entertained are valid OBJECTIONS to slates of electors. No debate is allowed during the Joint Session.
A motion to delay the count of Electoral Votes was debated during the objection to the Arizona Slate of Electors. This can be watched in its entirety on the Live Videos that were recorded by CSPAN and WALL STREET JOURNAL.
What happens to motions made from the floor of the Joint Session of Congress to delay the Electoral Vote Count? Nothing. Such motions are not permitted during that Joint Session. Such motions can only be brought during the time when the “Chamber Process”–the Joint Session–is delayed so the Senate can withdraw to their chambers and debate separately from the House. Maximum time for debate–2 hours for Objections.
The fate of the MOTION to delay the count? It was voted down in separate session debate by Senate and House because the DEMOCRATS HAD THE VOTES TO REJECT IT IN BOTH HOUSES.
This is not a mystery any longer.
Following Regitiger format:
…
Q: Why was Sund denied the National Guard, and when they finally showed up it was way after the violence had subsided.
…
A: There were too many FBI and DOJ agitators that had penetrated the crowd. Leadership didn’t want out-of-the-loop National Guard troops dispatching the violent individuals who were government agents. The real “optic” they feared were dead bodies turning out to be FBI. The cover up would have been more difficult than a few capitol police “suicides and medical issues.”
(With due respect to Sund, this answer is pretty easy, not much skullduggery required)
sounds reasonable. and probable.
If those “government agents” were informants, or some other kind of asset, it would not matter to them if any of them got shot or injured in some way. That’s who most of them were. There were DC Metro Police under cover as MAGA. I’m not sure the federal authorities would know much about them. Congress can throw a net over DC’s government whenever they like, so those undercovers could have been used as “officers killed by MAGA terrorists” or something.
All while good people rot in prison!!! I have been trying to tell people this for 2 years now but I can’t get through 2 sentences and they shut me down. We are in such deep, deep doo dooo!!!!
Okay, I have a few quibbles and some harder questions. I’ve watched this interview three times now.
first, I believe this is one of the best interviews that tucker has done in a long time. And this is good and in 55 minutes I learned more from the person in charge that I had in weeks of independent research. So overall, I give this interview a big plus. It matters.
but I have quibbles and some hard questions. I will list them in order of priority (my viewed priority)
I’m not convinced that SUND is telling the wrong story here. I think he was in the middle of a crisis ill advised and under prepared. I think he was and continues to place blame on others for his own capitol police to take the necessary action to quell the violence. He seems to have some credible accounts of how he was stonewalled and unsupported and that there were many suspicious IC community players who obviously did not raise the alarms to a level that would give reason to justify a more defensive posture to protect the capitol. And yes, I believe there was indeed a conspiracy in this regard to ensure that any violence that happened that day would be maximized by creating a lazy unprepared capitol police. But he also does not explain why his own capitol police are literally escorting the viking impostor up and down every hallway until they find the doors that are unlocked…and hundreds of others who were obviously there to protest very loudly and some even to get into a thrown down. I find his accounts of that day to be INCOMPLETE.
This is after watching the interview three times. I think he’s trying to sell books. I think if he had done his job right, no one would have been murdered and the capitol police would have arrested specific people like ray epps AND MANY OTHER SUSPICIOUS ACTOR/EMBEDS in that crowd who did the inciting. I am suspicious about the credibility of SUND.
and lastly this: Why didn’t tucker ask him out of the 2300 capitol police on payroll, fewer than 200 were actually on duty at the capitol and as things went south, that number of fewer than 200 never got increased???? things don’t add up.!
God Bless America
The District of Columbia is a federal enclave, not a State. Therefore, the Insurrection Act and Section 4, Article 4 of the Constitution do not apply. Under the Insurrection Act, the President can deploy REGULAR ARMY TROOPS to put down insurrections within States provided the State authority, Governor/Legislature formally request such assistance. In a federal enclave like DC, here is how the deployment takes place:
“This authority to activate the D.C. National Guard has been delegated, by the President, to the Secretary of Defense and further delegated to the Secretary of the Army.”
This does not mean the President cannot order the DC Guard activated. Since the Secretary of Defense and Secretary of the Army are answerable to the President, the President could activate the DC Guard as well, which means bring it into federal service officially. When it comes to deployment, the President deploys the Guard. The Speaker of the House cannot either activate, nor deploy, the DC Guard, and neither can the Mayor of DC.
Once you activate the Guard, they are federal troops, but not regular troops. They are the ORGANIZED MILITIA under the Militia Act. Draft age young men, and those up to the age of about 45, are in the UNORGANIZED MILITIA.
good to know. I appreciate the info.
So I am assuming that there is a national guard unit attached specifically and permanently to DC? (and a separate national guard attached to virgina sans DC?)
thank you for your reply.
God Bless America
This explains a lot – spread it far and wide!
“Committee of 300” – by Dr. John Coleman
Their USA headquarters are located at the “Aspen Institute”.
his lecture from 1994 predicted the exact outcome on J6 (including the manufactured “pandemic” and virus.)
These wealthy families choose our Presidents and leaders for us.
Democracy and voting is just an illusion. There really is no choice.