Occam’s Razor: When faced with competing explanations for the same phenomenon, the simplest is likely the correct one.
(1) An investigative silo within the federal apparatus falsely identified me as “1% Watchdog.” (2) When confronted with the truth of the matter, and after their own independent investigation, federal investigators acknowledged that some other entity fabricated their bona fides using my identity. (3) Admitted (by them) the most likely motive was to influence trust amid the communication group of “1% Watchdog.”
In my humble opinion, and applying Occam’s Razor, “1% Watchdog” was/is a federal agent.
What other motive would a person carry to fabricate their identity, create false bona fides, if not to influence a sense of trust in their target audience?
NOTICE the wording: […] “your administration of the “Stop the Steal J6” channel.”
This appears to outline “1% Watchdog” as the owner/administrator/controller of the communication platform.
These are not unfounded suppositions. Simply reverse engineer the process, apply the scientific method to your review, then apply Occam’s razor.
Counselors – On behalf of your client(s) file a motion with the judge requesting a court order compelling Zello to give up the registration records of the ‘Stop the Steal J6’ channel. This will identify the person behind “1% Watchdog”. If federal prosecutors fight the request for the court order, well: (a) there’s your answer; and (b) take the next step of using the preexisting congressional subpoena as evidence to support your compulsion.
For MEDIA – In an effort to improve personal time management, and devote necessary time to advancing our goals, please consider this a standard form letter response to any further inquiry:
Dear Mr./Mrs. XXXXXXXX, prudence and necessarily instilled manners dictate that all correspondence deserves the full weight of a polite response.
Allow me to thank you, with the humblest and earnest of appreciation, for all you do on behalf of a simple citizenry of which I am a proud and insignificant member.
Indeed, if our paths were ever to cross in person, I hold no disposition that you, as a person of consequence, would ever afford these calloused and well-worn hands the time of day. I am, like many, comfortably invisible.
That said, and with the utmost respect for your professional endeavors, I hope you will consider this correspondence carefully.
It is not our “goal” to raise our profile through the injustice that corruption represents. It is our goal to shine light upon that corruption….
When you see that justice is measured, not by due process, but by compulsion – when you see that in order to invoke your sixth amendment right to due process, you need to obtain permission from men who rebuke the constitution – when you see that justice is determined by those who leverage, not in law, but in politics – when you see that men get power over individual liberty by graft and by scheme, and your representatives don’t protect you against them, but protect them against you – when you see corruption holding influence and individual liberty so easily dispatched and nullified – you may well know that your freedom too is soon to perish.
You present opportunity for interview as if it is reflective of some courageous or magnanimous endeavor on your behalf. Alas, the disconnect, and innocent naivete’ of those only partially immersed in the battle to save the republic, shines through.
I’m almost certain that you hold the best of all intentions. However, in viewing a goal to be getting this type of story advanced, you miss the entire point.
My honest and respectfully intended question to you would be: What is it that makes media folks always want to “get an interview” when the information is there for the taking?
Perhaps, by training, by habit, or by unintended consequence you have developed your business model, and as a consequence yourself, to live for the process itself as an end result. Is it logical to believe that journalism is the interview; the conversation is the point; the smoke is the fire?
Please forgive my uneducated and poorly worded suppositions, but apparently journalism has evolved into reveling in the process and, as a consequence, it completely ignores the end point, misses the bottom line, doesn’t actually SEE the subject matter and never actually applies what might be discovered.
In fact, I’m led to believe that sometimes those within the media avoid the subject matter deliberately, because if they get their heads around it and nail it home, they won’t have anything to talk about anymore – because they will have exhausted their stash.
Not attempting whatsoever to lump your intention into such a fray; however, many have gotten into the habit of milking each situation for “so many leads,” “so many interviews,” “so many column inches,” and “so many angles” that problem-solving does not appeal to them at all. They oddly appear to favor the endless process.
So, when there’s an approach like what you are encountering with our significant site research, and my reluctance for self-involvement, I don’t fit – because I don’t give a flip about “the process.” And therefore, I do not fit into the rationale of the box or the PERT chart.
If you want to make these truths known, they are free for the taking; and they are by no matter or consequence dependent on my advancement.
Borrowing from Mike Vanderboegh – This is no small thing, to restore a republic after it has fallen into corruption. I have studied history for years and I cannot recall it ever happening. It may be that our task is impossible. Yet, if we do not try then how will we know it can’t be done? And if we do not try, it most certainly won’t be done. The Founders’ Republic, and the larger war for western civilization, will be lost.
But I tell you this: We will not go gently into that bloody collectivist good night. Indeed, we will make with our defiance such a sound as ALL history from that day forward will be forced to note, even if they despise us in the writing of it.
And when we are gone, the scattered, free survivors hiding in the ruins of our once-great republic will sing of our deeds in forbidden songs, tending the flickering flame of individual liberty until it bursts forth again, as it must, generations later. We will live forever, like the Spartans at Thermopylae, in sacred memory.
With profound appreciation for your time and attention, and the warmest of regards.
Truly,
Sundance
[Support The Conservative Treehouse Here]
As I suspected. If they stole your identity in order to “gain trust” (i.e., entrap people,) they’ve done it to others. Identity theft is a crime. That may be a way to demand answers and accountability.
Wire fraud too. It is a federal crime, and is per instance. Federal prison time and financial penalties are applied for each and every instance. There is no such thing as parole.
If it’s the government doing it, they won’t prosecute themselves.
You can adjust your tinfoil hat so it doesn’t stop blood from circulating in your brain.
It would make sense that a fed or two write here, I’ve has suspicions, but, “most of the Treepers”?
Why would it only be a few when there are millions online? Are they saving the others for more important things?
Besides…you’re here…
“Paranoia strikes deep
Into your life it will creep
It starts when you’re always afraid
You step out of line, the man come and take you away”
The cure – life your best life, each day.
Nice song.
Here’s one that signature reduction might like…
FBI Open Up – Song – YouTube
Or bots. I have long thought there are bots- fake accounts here. You can kinda tell. They have names I have never heard of and they try to distract or steer the conversation in ways that are negative or despairing.
This is the same guy – idontknow, Pfizer winkyeye, stealthcat5.0 etc or bot that keeps popping up. I sent an alert earlier to the mods. Either they haven’t got to it or they’re allowing him/it to continue.
Who or whatever it is, it’s not as clever as it believes itself to be. Done caught it about 5 times in this last week alone.
BK….I didn’t see your message in the mail, but thanks for trying. He’s gone for now…
Perhaps you used a different email addy….I’m not finding it. 🙁
I might not be doing it right. I just hit the red flag by his comments and assumed you guys would see. If that’s not correct, send me instructions how to do it right on my email so I can study. I catch this almost everyday lately. Thanks
Ah….we don’t see it ’til at least 10 others hit the red flag.
Just email us…everyone in the back room knows about this nutter. We’ll jump on it…promise!
Got it. Didn’t know how it worked. He or it has been on every article today all over and everyday since you took down stealthcat5.0. I figured out the pattern/algorithm in my head with this one after about 3-4th ‘incarnation.’
I just can’t figure out if it is human or some form of AI/bot. But there’s something inherently ‘evil’ I’ve noticed, literally.
I sometimes fear I make a pest of myself notifying our Cat Herders about these bot types.
Sure glad more and more of us are developing the eye for them.
Put your name in the subject line before you list the subject, so it stands out from the spammy stuff and they know to see what you are reporting.
There are housands of comments on multiple threads. Any help is always MOST appreciated!
But no paw memes, I promise!
My meming career died instantaneously in the most ironic way possible. 😥😁
TY!
TY!
And that 1%Watchdog character wouldn’t be much of a Watchdog at 1% on the scale of watchdogs would he!! Oh no, the feds don’t want to ever be contacted again and reminded of their crimes!! 1%—what fools these feds be. Malevolent traitors.
SUNDANCE: When I read the replies to posts on Twitter world, very radical and destructive and violent replies or comments, I always think about what kind of person would type these highly threatful words in a public space.
These words could be a sudden outlet for anger or they could be government ‘infiltrators’ in disguise.
At times, people or whatever entity can click Like on these comments. And that is where one ends up in a special file of the NSA database.
Proud of you, Sundance. In spite of all obstacles and/or hardships that we are witness to or victim of, we should all follow in Sundance’s footsteps.
We win through exposure, strategy, and word-of-mouth. WINNING.
so the Oath Keeper, J W, discussed stuff online with an agent using the handle 1%Watchdog. JW perhaps thought 1%Watchdog was the site administrator. Did JW think 1% was Sundance? so if Sundance was supposed to be 1% Watchdog, who was supposed to be 5% Watchdog? Has Sundance contacted JW? does JW comment at Treehouse? maybe the agent just got herself a new watchdog? Again, my only surprise is that they admitted their source was not credible. any of us can be jailed for no reason and maybe soon be offed for no reason in today’s america.
Good analysis. But the part about “admitted their source was not credible” may be inaccurate.
I read into it as the ‘watchdog’ was the federal agent and the committee and DOJ were not about to reveal who it was, so they decided not only to not pursue SD, but told him not to have any more contact with them.
It could have also messed up their J6 cases had the source been revealed.
SD would be wise not to make contact with JW for a multitude of legal and security concerns for both.
Lastly, JW may be in lock and cannot communicate.
and is 1%watchdog Ray Epps?
JW is most likely Jessica Watkins who is mentioned in the Guardian aticle and possibly also Julie Kelly’s article (links in my comment upthread) Watkins appeared to be heard communicating back and forth with 1% watchdog while in the Capitol.
Watkins was convicted last November and will be sentenced on May 26th (sentence could be up to 56 yrs).
OMG! They are going to stick it to that girl to keep her from being able to investigate / discuss so it can all be unraveled. It has taken them 6 months for a sentence? They are slow rolling this to make it last as long as they can.
Right smack on, Sundance! We probably can’t save the freedom guaranteed by our Constitution, but we can become the thread of hope for future generations who will no doubt be yearning for that freedom. This is all we can really give to our progeny. And, like our fore bearers, they will overcome and the result will be more freedom for more people than ever before.
I am now anticipating what will be the approach for the Bureaucratic State and for the powerful who will hold on to the power.
Think of this as a continuity tester–you know, the multi-meter tool that you check voltages and resistance with. The WHOLE apparatus is inextricably linked in various ways, so ANY party who has been unjustly prosecuted HAS within their legal reach the means by which to uncover the apparatus en toto. But, one has first to comprehend that fact and then think clearly about WHERE TO LOOK for discovery.
This is an excellent move for the general demographic confronted with prosecution. However, it deserves to be pressed in this specific instance to discovery. No investigative agency should tolerate criminal behavior at the root of their investigation just because it leads in the “wrong” direction. Else, the investigators are not honest brokers.
Anyone know how many “ministries of truth” our corrupt illegitimate government has to date?
How much time can someone be sentenced to if one of the governments unconstitutional anti 1st amendment agencies deems that their factual speech is damaging to the governments false narrative, finding their speech to be aiding a hostile foreign government even if they can prove that the government is lying?
https://www.rt.com/news/575936-us-foreign-disinformation-intelligence-redundant/
“most of the Treepers are feds”
Q – does that mean that a buncha Feds like my cat photos?
🤣🤣🤣
Sundance and fellow Treepers, in the response to the Media, this phrase made me uncomfortable:
“It is not our “goal” to raise our profile through the injustice that corruption represents. It is our goal to shine light upon that corruption….”.
I may be reading that in entirely the wrong context, but who is “our”? I immediately stumbled there. Are you referring to %1? Or Zello? Or ….
Might it admit something that isn’t so?
I read that “our” as all of us Treepers.
Correct.
TY
Or the editorial “we”?
All I can do is shake my head. I thought McCarthy was going to get to the bottom of this ( ya…right).
In regards to all the J6’ers wrongfully convicted and rotting in federal prison- I’ll bet Charles Manson got better treatment ( and attorneys). It will take a full pardon by Pres. Trump to rectify things.
Sundance has my admiration and the country is better served by him. I hope somehow this story really gains traction but I’m not holding my breath.
45 posted the first rendition on Truth Social yesterday. Yep. It got T.R.A.C.T.I.O.N.
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/110322307286324332
so Trump reposted this on Truth Social yesterday. awesome. I keep trying to join Truth Social but do not have cell phone capability in my area only land line. I wish TS would allow land line phones to respond.
Try joining at TruthSocial.com instead of the app. Maybe it doesn’t ask for cell #. I can’t remember what they asked for as I actually go on the first week, but I use the app.
Thanks, MaineCoon. Truth Social wants email which I give then directs me to my email then asks for my phone #. the line for phone already has a 1 in place. I keep putting my land line # in as the only one I have and they don’t ring back. so sad.
You can view comments by clicking Trump Truth Social without joining. Do it all the time.
I do that with Twitter, but have never been able to do so with Truth.
Is there a trick to it?
A full pardon would only partially rectify things that should never happen, that compounded injuries, and have inflicted irreverisble damage and losses on the people abused.
So if you or I construct a plan to convince, lead others to break the law, we are criminals. If certain agencies do the same, they are doing law enforcement. Since when playing the Devil, enticing to break the law is “law enforcement”?
“Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.” Is. 5:20
The Lord is ever watching–nobody escapes His justice. Sooner or later Justice will be done.
Bravo! Well said, Sundance!
Absolutely. The drone account is a creation of theirs to facilitate whatever they thought they could get away with.
Remember, the process is the punishment.
They’ve stepped up from the process being the punishment on the j6 persecutions.
I still say that when the government takes you to court, it should be in your jurisdiction and the NOT the government’s.
Especially since we’re guaranteed a jury of our peers. My peers do not reside in DC.
God is working through Sundance because Sundance has made a commitment to God.
We cannot defeat the evil before us without God. At times it seems we are against an unbeatable force. But what is impossible for us is easy for our Maker.
It is difficult to be brave but we must have faith. God has a plan.
Pray for Sundance.
clean up on isle stupid and uniformed please.
Pacing ourselves for the long fight.
WOLVERINES vs FILTHY LIBERALS.
Thank you. —€
Counselors – There will be no more convictions of J6 defendants, unless defense counsel is complicit. Too bad for those who already failed to represent your clients.
The govt entrapment/psyop agents have so overplayed their hand it’s hard to believe that anything bad that happens in our country was not caused by them. My initial reaction is now always, another FBI/CIA/DHS hitjob, train derailment and poisonous dioxide release=>FBI; food processing plant explosion=>FBI; mass shooting of children=>DHS (what better way to win public support for gun control than killing kids?)
This is an incorrect statement of Occam’s Razor. It can lead to perverse conclusions by those who accept it.
Here is a correct one.
The truth is free…like gold in the ground…DIG for it.
“I ended up representing people close to Gen. Flynn at high ranking positions within the military establishment…
“When Gen. Flynn came in there were already efforts to entrap him, much as they had done to Carter Page, as much as they did with the Whitmer entrapment. The same methods and modus operandi as they did on January sixth that’s detailed and documented in the proud boys trial…”
–Robert Barnes: The Corruption of the FBI, April 25, 2023 (Hillsdale)
How in the world can these federal authorities, who took an OATH the defend the Constitution of the United States, live with themselves? WE, the people, pay them to harass us. Absolutely shameful.
review the nature of Joe Stalin’s commissars.
Sundance, next time I have “bug off” letter to write I’m plagiarizing you…
x