Let us not forget the history of Egypt 2011, Libya 2012 and the original U.S. State Department Ukraine operations in 2014.

Everything we are seeing in U.S. media surrounding U.S. interests in Ukraine is a massive propaganda operation with the headquarters in the U.S. State Department and U.S. intelligence community.  The sense of sympathy you are feeling is part of an intentionally manipulative operation from within this DC matrix.

The images, pictures, videos, speeches, soundbites and the cinematography broadcast by U.S. corporate media are all purposefully intended to create a very specific outlook within the American people toward the issues in Ukraine.  The leftist United Nations, and the leftist U.S State Dept, will work together on this just like they have done in the prior examples (Ukraine 1.0, Libya, Egypt, etc.)

If you question any of their constructs, if you point out the puppet strings, if you notice the collective distribution of specifically repeated patterns, you are a labeled a Russian apologist.  However, it is critical to retain our reference points to recognize when we are being misled by this effort.

This is not to say that Russian President Vladimir Putin is a good actor in this scenario, he’s not.  This is also not to say that Volodymyr Zelenskyy is a willful participant in this geopolitical scheme, he’s not.  Zelenskyy is stuck in a scenario that is not in his control. He is doing the best he can to avoid the worst outcome, which means he is aligning with the U.S. State Dept, because it is the least bad of the two current options.

There are genuine Ukraine freedom fighters, and genuine leaders inside Ukraine who are fighting to remain an independent state free from the influence of Russia.   However, the free Ukrainian elements are also stuck with the political manipulations of external forces like the U.S. and NATO.

The ultra-leftists in the U.S. Deep State Department have been playing in Ukraine for well over a decade.  Do you really think they will just walk away from their investments without fighting to retain that influence? Of course not.

Additionally, do you think the DC system has put this much effort into their control over Ukraine politics for this long, and would walk away without putting forth a fight? Again, of course not.  This is the playground of people like former Senator John McCain and current U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham. Within the DC alignment, there is no distance between the political parties when it comes to the benefits of geopolitical influence.

Republicans and Democrats are united in “foreign policy”, and institutions like the Senate Foreign Relations Committee are aligned with the intents and purposes of the Deep State intelligence apparatus and U.S. State Department.  This is an alignment based on mutually beneficial outcomes.

♦ Without a doubt, there are U.S. military “contractors” and dark money special operations forces embedded within the Ukraine fighting units, who can quickly melt into the civilian population if an insurgency approach is needed.  If Russia takes all of Ukraine (that’s a big ‘if’), we can be certain that U.S. elements will be inside the country triggering conflict to retake western control.  The U.S. will never give up on their Ukraine investments.

Authorization ‘finding memos‘, permitting covert operations in Ukraine, from the White House to the Gang of Eight in Congress would easily find support.  The DC system will collectively align in common purpose, and there will be no dissent permitted.  We are seeing that now.

All of that said… depending on how tenuous it gets, the western alliance is already positioning to trigger an actual ‘hot’ conflict with deployment of the NATO article five charter under the auspices of cyber warfare.

NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said today that “cyberattacks” against any NATO country by Russia can trigger article five of the NATO treaty.  Meaning U.S-NATO forces will consider cyberattacks as justification for military engagement by the U.S. and NATO in Ukraine.

The groundwork is being assembled for the United States to be pushed into more open military engagement.  In order to pull this off, they need the media system to push a sympathy narrative, that’s where the Hollywood-centric U.S. State Department steps in.  Watch out for this “pallywood” type propaganda when it surfaces, and recognize the intent is to manipulate the way you think, view and feel about the issues as they unfold. 

Yesterday, from the White House podium, Deputy National Security Advisor Daleep Singh boiled down the leftist view of geopolitical power to a cultural issue of social likeability.  Singh stated, “Strategic success in the 21st century is not about a physical land grab of territory; that’s what Putin has done.  In this century, strategic power is increasingly measured and exercised by economic strength, by technological sophistication and your story – who you are, what your values are; can you attract ideas and talent and goodwill? And on each of those measures, this will be a failure for Russia.”

This is the same outlook on geopolitical power that took us to an interventionist position in Egypt, by removing Hosni Mubarark, and in Libya, killing Mouamar Kaddaffi.  This is an approach based on using Big Tech and social media as weapons to manipulate the perspectives of Americans to support the interventionist intents of the U.S. government.  They succeeded then in the Middle East by igniting the Islamist Spring, and they succeeded again in 2014 in the original Ukraine intervention.

Big Tech (Google, Microsoft) and Social Media operations like Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, etc., are “non-governmental actors” who work on behalf of the intents of the U.S. government, specifically the U.S. State Dept.   The intent is to shape opinion.

Collaboratively, this network will coordinate with the messaging and narrative within corporate media.  The alphabets, CNN, CNNi, Fox, MSNBC and the on-line allies at the New York Times, Washington Post, Politico, etc. then collaborate.  Together the media and tech form a massive psychological campaign against the psyche of the American public.  Everything is purposeful.

That’s the backdrop for this important statement today from Hillary Clinton as she calls for all these interests and agencies to align in common cause to assist in the Ukraine “story”, to use the words of Daleep Singh yesterday.  Listen to how former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton asks for “non-governmental” actors to get involved.  The video is only two minutes, but listen carefully at 00:36 forward {Direct Rumble Link}:

https://rumble.com/embed/vt8zab/?pub=4

Keep in mind that NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg said cyberattacks by Russia would be considered triggers for article five war.  Now you see Hillary Clinton openly called for the United States government and NGA’s to conduct cyberattacks against Russia.  “I think we could also be attacking a lot of the government institutions and again, the oligarchs and their way of life through cyberattacks,” she declares.

We are being manipulated for military engagement within Ukraine.

We are being manipulated by the propaganda of the U.S. State Dept.

We are being manipulated.

It is not Ukraine President Volodymyr’s fault.   He is as much a victim in this as we are.

FUBAR

Posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Clinton(s), Cold Anger, Communist, Conspiracy ?, Culture, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Egypt & Libya, Egypt & Libya Part 2, European Union, History, Joe Biden, JoeBama, media bias, NATO, Notorious Liars, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Russia, Secretary of State, Typical Prog Behavior, Ukraine, Uncategorized, USA
Share
more