Late Monday night the state of Texas filed a lawsuit directly in the Supreme Court against four states: Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvan and Wisconsin. The intent is to block those states from casting their Electoral College votes for Joe Biden due to the unconstitutional nature of mail-in ballot use – against legislative approval and requirement.
Today 17 states filed an amicus brief [pdf link] in support of the Texas lawsuit.
The seventeen states include Missouri, Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, and West Virginia.
As noted in the supportive filing: “The States have a strong interest in preserving the proper roles of state legislatures in the administration of federal elections, and thus safeguarding the individual liberty of their citizens.”
[…] “States have a strong interest in ensuring that the votes of their own citizens are not diluted by the unconstitutional administration of elections in other States. When non-legislative actors in other States encroach on the authority of the “Legislature thereof” in that State to administer a Presidential election, they threaten the liberty, not just of their own citizens, but of every citizen of the United States who casts a lawful ballot in that election — including the citizens of amici States.
Here’s the Full Amicus Brief:
.
…”A true patriot keeps the attention of his fellow citizens awake to their grievances, and not allow them to rest till the causes of their just complaints are removed.”…
I’m not sure I’d trust any lawsuit put out by the NY AG. She’s slime.
TwoLaine, did you mean to post this on the Fakebook thread? 😉
Yes.
Affirmative Action Slime and 100% pure activist ghetto. Can you imagine how many people she kill had she gone to medical school instead? OMG, the bodies would be stacked like cord wood!
Lol. Now that is a rant Cali Joe! I concur!
May just be me, but I feel like many are allowing their emotions to lead their thinking, and aren’t seeing the potential plus’s coming out of this situation.
For ONE, the Rinos have been forced out of stealth mode, so that many WHO HADN’T BEFORE, are seeing, and beginning to grapple with the true nature of the Rinos of the Uniparty.
Its the Emperors new clothes, where many deplorables persisted in thinking in R vs D terms. which is like repeating comments on how lovely the Emperors robes look.
Secondly, up until months ago, people including Sundance were repeating “PDJT’s 63 million supporters”.
And, a month ago, nobody was talking about “Dominion software.”
Does anyone really believe PDJT only got 63 million votes, in 2016?
How about that Hillary won the popular vote, and got 8million more votes than PDJT??
THINK about it, and the ramifications, because it goes farther.
We have been TOLD, and repeated and accepted “The U.S. is a 50/50 nation, with slightly more democrats.”
WHERE does this oft stated as fact narrative originate?
From State election workers, who (in 30 States) keep track of party registeations in there States. Hmmm, review the videos of the suitcases of ballots, and ask yourself how reliable is THAT source!
But wait, theres MORE!
We then turn to,…POLLSTERS who take THAT info from those states, and the info they get from conducting their politically oriented polls (you know, the ones showing Hillary and Joe 6 points up?) and, similar to how they conduct polls, they extrapolate i.e. GUESS how many voters are R, and how many D.
Are Blue States, like NY where the rural areas are Red, and the Democrat run cities are said to overwhelm the rural vote, REALLY Blue?
Are purple States really purple? ARE we REALLY a 50/50 nation, with SLIGHTLY more Dems, or is this a narrative pushed by the Pollsters, and seemingly substantiated by election totals, which have been Dominionised, for YEARS?
I start out with the assumption PDJT will prevail, and be declared the winner.
With that assumption, Dominion will never be used in an election, again.
All the methods to secure our elections, like voter I.D, etc.and that the Conmunists have fought calling it “Voter Suppression” WILL be implemented. The demand will be too great, and actually the basis for the Texas suit demands it.
After all, if One State like Texas or Florida has strong safeguards in place, and another like California has motor/voter, and issues drivers licences to illegals, ….well?
SAME legap principle and precedent. States can be sued, by other States, for lax requirements on FEDERAL elections.
Each coup attempt, has exposed his enemies more, undermined THEIR credibility, enhanced HIS, increased his support, and reduced theirs.
And, we don’t really have any idea how much support each side actually has, anyway.
It could actually be 35/65, 70/30 range, and we would have no way to know.
Actually, look at Foxs news ratings, compared to msm, prior to the election. THATS an indicator, and it AIN’T “50/50, with slightly more Dems”, if it was Fox wouldn’t have been beating CNN.
And of coarse rally attendance.
WE have been victimised by a relative minority, who have conned us into believing they are a majority.
I see SOME additional struggles ahead, but MUCH room for optimism.
I am all for Illegal Voter Suppression!
Yes, talk about FOREIGN interference in US elections?HELLOOOOO.. sanctuary cities are right here in the USA ..who needs Russia??
You wrote: WE have been victimized by a relative minority…..
Exactly. Right now, probably less than a thousand people have stolen the 2020 election from 230 MILLION people for all the D-rats. How many D-rats REALLY won in 2020? Probably not many. Afterall Sidney Powell found that in AZ, each D-rat got 35,000 votes before the counting even started. Every D-rat that “won” with less than 35,000 votes should be removed from office. JMHO
great point!
a small number of people have just disenfranchised 360 million!
sure some like the outcome, and will be quiet for now. But, they have to realize someone else can hire poll workers, and repeat the same SCAM!
Mike Dewine Rino Governor of Ohio
You got that right LOL. He’s a little Tyrant and has crushed Ohioans with his Covid shut downs.
Same with Hogan in MD. He’s {quite a bit) better than the Donkey alternatives. But, the Donkeys hold a supermajority in the legislature, so what good is it anyway.
Of course, how many of them didn’t cheat? That’s the question…even here in the deep blue (Red, actually…we need to stop with the red/blue bullshit narrative already), there are a LOT of conservatives…is the fake Donkey even a majority here?
I don’t believe for a second that Klacik lost by the margin she did. That said, I think MD is bluer than CA and NY at this point given it’s close proximity to the Swamp. Even my relatively conservative friends in MD hate the President. It is maddening.
I’ve never believed we were a 50/50 nation. I think the Democrats have been stealing it for decades (using their control over dirty cities to steal the whole state). It’s just that it’s obvious with Trump because we can see our numbers at the rallies, and the left can’t compare. They (including Faux news) always tell us that AOC is the popular one on the left, but when she had her “Green New Deal” rally, there were maybe 12-15 people there, who hardly looked like they want to be there. The left has nothing to offer most Americans–they are the Davos party and everything they stand for is against America, so they have to steal to get and stay in power.
If we get rid of the election machines and go back to paper and hand counting, we might have a chance to have people in there who actually represent the people. Right now we have people in there who know they can screw the people because they know it’s the machines that get them elected.
I do believe the conservatives are a majority but don’t understate the size of the Democrat party. I think this last election when you remove fraud it is probably in the 78-81 M for Trump and 55-63 M for generic Democrat. Trump also won a significant number of split ticket Democrats, the ones that aren’t onboard with socialism and the green new deal.
I’m obviously bias but, democrats have to ignore a lot of truth to come to the conclusions they do. Biden, seriously?
Harris never was even a pick, she bombed their on primary.
You want a gal in office we can find a fit.
I agree. It only looks like 50/50 because one side cheats only enough to overtake the other, with a small cushion to avoid an automatic recount. It could be 60/40 or 70/30 for all we know, all they need to do is tweak their Dominion algorithm and BINGO!
I knew when this happened, not only the obvious new Soros computer switcheroo but also the politicians stopped pretending to care about us at all!
Look at all these pot holes. LOL. Deteriorated infrastructure.. illegal slave laborers stealing AMERICAN jobs..and the list goes on..
Not even a little bit did they worry about our votes anymore, they knew they would be INSTALLED against our wishes!
I see your point and appreciate it. Having said that, the minority of which you speak has their hands on the levers that amplify their impact… big tech, media, entertainment, fill-in-the-blank-ism (racism, etc). That’s a problem.
Secondly, there is a cognitive disconnect in the liberal mindset… ie; what they believe to be “good” for all, or the other guy… is not applicable to themselves. Many of my pro-choice acquaintances stop in their tracks when they are asked point-blank, would you abort your own child? Most liberals I know actually live a moderately conservative lifestyle, yet they want to impose the most liberal of standards on the rest of the country. That becomes a difficult group of people to persuade because it’s not a left vs right argument, it is more of a “why don’t you live by your own professed standards?” argument.
I’m tired of fighting for a country that half the people profess to not want to live in. I want my country the way it was founded… therefore, I was essentially here first…. so those who want someone like Biden to lead them, secede and start your own country. I’ll trade blue states for red, straight across. And I AM living my professed standard because I am moving from a red state to a blue one as we speak.
Can you imagine would a great country “Red” would be? Given ’em the coasts and the ports, give ’em Silicon Valley, give ’em Wall Street…. we’ll figure it out. I mean, it’s been done before… right?
One thing I have noticed with Dems, like my whole family, is that they do not connect cause and effect. Remember with Obama, people just loved him but hated his policies and the exact opposite with Trump.
My sister was talking about how all these new “green” products do not work, but she goes and votes for Biden et al…she does not get it at all.,
Oh, but it wouldn’t it be a shame to waste all that room we made for them at Gitmo?
They’re not getting squat. They probably STOLE half our states already with their foreign voting terminals.
We want back 100% it belongs to WE the American people. They’ll cease their TREASONOUS coup or they’ll face tribunals if they’re lucky.
Dutchman on point as usual.
Dutch, I think it is more like 10 to 2/3. Love your post!
It’s Pareto. 20/80 Principle.
In case I’m not the only one…
https://www.thebalancecareers.com/pareto-s-principle-the-80-20-rule-2275148
Dutch, exactly
We’re on the same wavelength.Here’s what I wrote a few comments back…
“We need to always remember, our opposition is the government, the enemy of the people “media”, Wall Street and the stench of leftist influence that permeates our academic, social and business entities
Together they make up a tiny group, a tiny group who’s power comes from the government and “media” bully pulpit, and the influence it holds over our children and manipulated / naive adults
This tiny groups “constituents” are basically kids and idiots, yet it’s able, through control of the MS “Media”, to project a totally false reality and narrative, with which it hopes to beat down any resistance, while acting as if their opposition numbers are tiny
But the actual reality is the majority of the American people are on the other side, and for many decades it’s been a reverse David and Goliath, where a huge David has been bullied into silence by a tiny Goliath
The left has been organized and cunning, while we’ve been asleep and/or intimidated, but now that we’re awake and getting our courage back, the left, as long as we keep our resolve, will crumble under our weight
They’re no match for the real power, the power of we the people united
We can begin to truly reclaim our country, our children’s futures and our dignity if we are successful in shutting down the treasonous usurpation of what is ours”
alliwantissometruth, Yessiree! I’m on the same wavelength as you and Dutchman.
I hate to beat a dead horse but as you stated, The left is no match for us IF we continue to fight (unlike our so-called R representatives minus folks like Jordan, etc).
Yes, we must reclaim our country and we are FINALLY starting to act instead of talk.
TRUMP 2020 and beyond!!
I think you are correct Dutch in both those statements and I feel it will be either MI or WI is the first domino to fall.I would like to elaborate further but when it was over I worried much less about the outcome GOD has his hand in it.
When Dominion is deep sixed and voter rolls are cleaned up, all a candidate has to do is either get a Trump endorsement or just say, “Hey, vote for me to teach them a lesson for stealing elections all these years. Now it’s our turn.” And it will be a landslide!
Great points Dutchman. I’ve never believed we were in the minority, much less that America is a 50/50 Nation, because there’s no real evidence for it I’ve posted here on CTH within the last month that this game’s been played on us for a looong time. We just need to have politicians with the guts to fight back. RINOs are in full view by those with discernment. Those that don’t support the effort should be primary’d. Texas is blue only in the areas that are heavily populated by illegal aliens (Southern border & the big cities) and those surrounding Universities. Otherwise, we’re a deep Red state. DJT didn’t just barely beat Gropin’ Joe in Texas, but that’s what we’re supposed to believe.
The biggest problem with Trump is he draws votes. This level of turnout does not allow the obscuring of fraud as a vanilla candidate- think Romeny – will allow. Trump is a dragon. He’s profane, obvious, and glorious. The Uniparty has never had to CONtend with such a beast. Welcome to 2020.
They threw a russia thing at him. Then it was Ukraine, then it was the Bad China Cold. Sorry!
The Gollum Trump drew us out in volumes beyond which their nonsense could obscure with fraud. Here we are. Even if all of the remedies afforded to us under the CONstitution fail; the vail is lifted. We’ve seen the mess in all of its glory. We’ve been defrauded. What’s the remedy?
I don’t know, but I’m comforted to understand how many past elections have been stolen and realizing this crap has been going on for 30 years is oddly comforting. Peace out!
Nice rant and needed with the insanity of the election.
Great points. Agree 100%.
Totally agree….we are the majority who have been repeatedly cheated by a minority. All we need to is band together and focus our frustration.
Imo, The Aragorn Trump drew us out in volumes….otherwise, well said!
Love this post
Guillotine! Guillotine! Guillotine!
i want to be Madame DeFarge and watch all the uniparty heads roll in front of me. Too bad I can’t knit.
Be worth learning to knit for such an event.
Nordic Breed, I’ll buy the wool and we can learn to knit together. BTW-Love your avatar. I’m on the cusp of getting another companion and the Bergen Haus Long Coat Sheperd is in my sights. But I may have relocate to colder climate to accommodate him. South eastern PA is not a cold enough for the breed IMHO…..nor for me.
Gorgeous breed! One of the best, imo. Did you know you can knit with their fur? It’s superior stuff, easy to card and spin. Nordic Spin might love it! ; )
And, rope! Bullets! Electric chairs! Rocks! Sticks!…
One thing that always triggered my combative dissodence. On 9/11/01 radical Islamic breached our homeland. Most horrific thing of our generation. Then, a mere seven years after that Americans eagerly and enthusiastically chose a president named Hussein Obama. Now I do not mean to say specific faiths should disqualify one for the office, but I could not fathom our fellow American citizens could just look past that. Then the bitter clinger comment came out and I thought there was no way in he’ll a majority of the country wouldn’t flee from that…yet they didn’t.
It felt surreal, just made no sense that that was reality.
Now maybe it starts to make sense, and I can trust my intuition again.
Yes. And stand by for that globally revered peace maker and US constitutional expert to weigh in on the silliness of those bitter clingers down in Texas.
Exactly! Thank you!
Nothing wrong with your intuition, travis.
I suspect history will at some point reveal him to be the first illegal alien president. ~spit~
Dutchman, You always make my day. In reality you have done that many, many times. I can’t thank you enough. I always have a bigger vision after learning from you. All the best.
I agree.
and think the the election fraud investigation will settle this…
https://twitter.com/4thAmendmentRe2/status/1336726615074762753?s=20
Can’t agree with you more, Dutchman. We have been duped by politicians and the media for a very long time. No more!
The sun is starting to peek through the dark clouds that have been slowly building over the last few decades. It is an awakening; spiritually and politically.
Everything is happening and unfolding exactly as it should. We are living in interesting times and even though it is not going to be without pain and hardship, I truly believe the best is yet to come!
God Bless!
Never thought it was anything but a trap.
We have too many traitors and finding them all was a task for God and Trump. Now we get to watch a masterpiece of miracles.
Prayers are heard. People in this nation pray and believe in our lord and savior, this is an answer to our prayers.
I see a great revival on the horizon.
Hey Dutch, Had the same thought yesterday, and which I believe is the most important of your many fine points:
“After all, if One State like Texas or Florida has strong safeguards in place, and another like California has motor/voter, and issues drivers licences to illegals, ….well?
SAME legap principle and precedent. States can be sued, by other States, for lax requirements on FEDERAL elections.”
This is the key.
Thanks for getting it out there.
Yes, revelations of Dominion voting machines changes everything. We have lied too and cheated for decades
Dutch, you are right over the target.
You cannot fathom the economic clout available [8B People yearning to be free]
An Act of God can happen in a ‘New York minute’.
Just between, say, a Patrick Byrne and Ivanka Trump, there’s more than enough experience and clout to utilize that [unlimited economic opportunity] which is available to us.
Cuomo & Co. can be taken for every penny they have by the disenfranchised hospitality workers in NYC alone. Slavery under government no more.
Trust God. Fear not.
Dutch, the Commies been doing this since Lenin’s little terrorist group took over Russian whilst calling themselves Bolsheviks, signifying “Majority.” Gaslighting been going on a long time.
Do think that’s air you are breathing?
Thank you Dutch! I have never accepted that we are a 50/50 nation.
Great post..
looking from the outside it seems demonrats control the individual state election infrastructures why is that ?
“These changes removed protections that responsible actors had recommended for decades to guard against fraud and abuse in voting by mail.”
Would the argument still hold if the state legislature had removed those protections instead of the Secretary of State or the Election Commission? If state legislatures remove protections against fraud, what can be done about it?
The argument is that election laws cannot be changed by any entity other than the state legislature, I think that is rock solid. However if state legislatures deliberately change voting laws so that one party is permanently in power, is that unconstitutional?
I would maintain that ballots that do not have a verifiable chain of custody from the voter to the election official, they are not Constitutional. For Heaven’s sake, register to vote in your town, show an ID, vote in person, keep the paper ballot for two years for verification and that is that. The only reason not to do this is to cheat.
That’s where representative government comes into play. We the people are supposed to be responsible enough to elect true representatives that will carry out our expectations.
It is up to the legislature to insure our elections are free and fair. If they are not, then how can we the people ever get fair representation? That’s where 2a comes in.
One way or another, the USA will remain a Constitutional Republic with the consent of the governed.
I heard in Pennsylvania the would have to put a change to election law on the ballot as referendum. As in, people have the final say whether election law changes. I wouldn’t be suprised if this is the case in more States.
Then again if we let the fraud stand in this election then it’s not a big step to fraud out a referendum result on election law. That is hy this fraud cannot stand. Or otherwise it will be the end of the Constitutiona Republic.
Was it Jefferson that said the Constitution is not a self-executing document? It requires constant vigilance.
I believe most citizens want representative government and free, fair elections. There are some who only want power (look for the “D” after their names) and who are completely willing to commit fraud to get it.
Ike said this in 1945:
“If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.”
Marxist elements advance a cause that is neither right nor moral, so I guess that kind of leaves the latter.
If I were Texas, (I am a Texan) if this blatant theft is not corrected I would then seriously consider, and I would do it, seperate myself (Texas) from the United States.
There would no longer be any reason to stay … Why ? So the leftist trash can suck Texas dry to support their failed policies for just that much longer..?
There has to be a line drawn..
.
They need the ability to control their borders and keep the Liberals out!
Texas was a Republic prior to joining the USA, and their agreement to join the Union of States allows for Texas to subdivide into 5 separate sub-states, which would then provide a total of 10 U S Senators from TX, not just two, as now.
If the Marxist Traitor Dims steal the vote, WH & Congress,…. exercise your option and block the Dim’s move with WDC and PR being made into States and four more Dim Senators.
Stick it to’em!
Super endorse your comment. Mr Abbot should send the 8 new senators to Washington ASAP
Amen
I agree. Secession must be on the table.
The 85% of the country that voted for Trump needs to succeed from the 15% that voted for dirty grandpa.
Let them rot in their rat infested cities with no food, water or power. There is no reason to give them whole states.
I
Agreed and have been thinking about this one a lot. Thats not as clear of a dividing line, but at the county level or something, I don’t know how we resolve that.
I think there are TONS of people fed up with the metropolitan elites dictating what they do. It all goes back to “we want to be left alone” and how those who do not ascribe to such have coalesced in a few locations.
Francis Labarbara says: “The 85% of the country that voted for Trump needs to succeed from the 15% that voted for dirty grandpa.
Let them rot in their rat infested cities with no food, water or power. There is no reason to give them whole states.”
***
Some of those “rat infested cities” have large and/or very important harbors and/or ports of call.
I am firmly against just giving those away to the rats.
My vote for the idea is “NO”.
IMO (humble though it may be), too many are willing to support giving them important stuff, for free. I am totally against that notion.
The ports would be staging areas for the PLA in short order. Better for a handful of states to secede an take the rest back from there.
ExNihiloNihilFit says: “The ports would be staging areas for the PLA in short order. Better for a handful of states to secede an take the rest back from there.”
Not to mention the strategically important rail-yards, airports and airfields, and assorted infrastructure, including hospitals, power-generation and central power-grids, and even military bases.
Just hand it all over. Here you go, enemy, enjoy. We’ll “take it back later”.
That’s the best move, eh?
Whatever you are smoking, it’s good stuff; I’ll give you that.
This keeps coming up lately but will never happen.
Just tally up for a starter: Medicaid payments, education funding, infrastructure assistance, and the massive corrupt welfare system.
In 1860 it was basically just a matter of states buying the coastal federal military fortifications (which they were trying to do), and establishing trade pacts apart from the North.
It’s not that high.
What you have to factor in is the deception.
I know a lot of Democrats — good, nice people. They just
vote Democrat and are otherwise clueless.
It’s probably 65/40 from a pure policy/belief standpoint.
In other words, probably half those who vote Democrat
would not if they knew the truth.
I meant a 60/40 split.
That is wrong
Democrats know the truth
they just selectively accept it.
I know because
I argue with them all the time.
I have flipped 3 lifetimers by beating them over the head with truth. Very few see past what they are told by msm.
Yes, that’s the problem. They watch the news and assume they are informed. They don’t realize they are being conditioned to accept the new reality via propaganda.
Too many accept what an educator, celebrity, news reader, “expert, tells them. They do not apply critical thinking and ask if it comports with common sense and their own observations.
And what about us who unfortunately have to live in a liberal-infested city because we need to keep a job? So we can go to hell, too? I pay my taxes, obey all the laws and I and others like me should suffer because –? And by the way, I come from upstate New York where it is mostly conservative, very Republican. Let them rot, too, as they live in a blue state and are subjected to libtard policies?
Some of you are just out of control with your vitriol towards us Treepers who happen to live in blue states. Moving out is simply not an option for some of us.
And by the way, why can’t NYC be won back—Rudy was a great mayor—so it can happen again. And while we’re at it, getting rid of that ugly murdering thug Cuomo would be another step in the right direction. And with all the fraud going on, it makes me wonder just how many rats really got authentically elected through the past decades.
I agree with you.
Stuck in deep blue MA for my job, too. Understand your frustration. Still I wonder now if MA isn’t more purple than blue based on the corruption we see.
The traitors that don’t wind up in front of a firing squad, they can all have Chaz. But we won’t bring them coffee and snacks or turn on their power this time. And we’ll add a big beautiful wall. Morons.
I will go there.
Texas is NOT alone. Half the country will go with her.
Read this article I found over at JoNova. This is an Aussie site and they have been all over the election fraud.
https://joannenova.com.au/2020/12/trumps-two-year-sting-executive-order-13848-may-trigger-by-dec-18/
I’ve heard a lot here about his EO but as of yet he hasn’t said one word about it. I’d really love to know why he’s waiting, time is not exactly on our side.
Because there was no follow up. The deep state just ignored the order and let fraud happen.
DNI Ratcliffe has 45days to put together a dossier of sorts pointing to the bad actors from an article.
Right Wing, read the EO; it’s available and not lengthy.
In a nutshell, the DNI has so many days (45, I think) from the election to gather info on foreign actors AND their tools in the US, after which, he gives his results to POTUS. If foreign interference is confirmed, Katy bar the door.
There is no reason for POTUS to mention the EO until it is time to act on the EO.
So what are our odds here? Are we in “Hail Mary” mode? In general, it looks like what has to happen is:
(1) SCOTUS has to agree to hear the case
(2) SCOTUS has to rule in Texas’ favor.
(3) Then SCOTUS’ ruling has to be one such that the remedy actually results in reversing the election (as opposed to, for instance, seeing SCOTUS make the statehouses toss the vote and unilaterally choose their electors, at which point they choose Biden electors anyway).
So are all three of these conditions reasonably good likelihoods to hang our hopes on? I hope so but these days I don’t know where things really stand as far as what the future portends…
Trump still has other legal/constitutional means.
He can institute the Resurrection Act along with (limited) Martial Law.
Resurrection Act?
Actually, works for me.
Haha.
I meant Insurrection Act!
Pretty sure that’s the act Dems use to gather voters.
That’s what Mark Twain said even 150 years ago.
Ha! That’s great!
Hey, if President Trump can bring the J man back a second time I certainly won’t object. Best act ever!
If the court does what it usually does, it will try to maintain the status quo.
In this case, the status quo means an election was held, a victor “declared”, and we all go back to fighting about abortion and taxes while pretending that elections matter and the legal system is just.
The cynical bet is the safe bet.
Be pleasantly surprised to be proven wrong…but keep your expectations very, very, low.
Our elites are marginally-competent functionaries who select for “corrupt” and “ruthless” in their institutions.
I hope I’m wrong, but I’m probably not.
If this obvious theft of the election is let slide, people won’t vote ever again. Why would they?
People are talking about moving to Red-er areas. There is a seismic shift going on.
You mean like how everyone was going to rise up against masks and shutdowns? Or the ones on this site who, like a moth to a flame, immediately went all-in for those turkeys in GA instead of recognizing the run-off in GA for what it is: a transparent attempt to bring the rubes back in line by scaring them about the socialism and judges.
I wouldn’t put it past the Uniparty to dial back the fraud just enough that one of them wins and we get a divided Senate with Harris breaking the tie – just to keep up the APPEARANCE that our elections are legitimate.
Hokkoda I’m in GA and I think you are spot on in your last paragraph. This is exactly my prediction as to what will happen. They’ll probably “let” Loeffler win as her opponent is pretty radical, that would be the easiest one to explain away. Meanwhile, Perdue “loses” to Ossoff. And Loeffler is new to the Senate anyway and a weakling who will be easily manipulated by the Uniparty. And then it will be, “see, see, our elections are secure and fair!!!” I hope and pray I’m wrong.
I completely understand your skepticism, but a line has been crossed here; one which most of us never thought would occur.
Comparing it to the minor inconvenience of wearing a face diaper is absurd. I’m not going to risk my family’s livelihood because I’m pressured to wear a mask when I walk into a store.
When there’s an actual coup that will force my kids to live under a perpetual socialist regime…all bets are off.
Lines have been crossed for 56+ years, almost all resulting in failure for our side. Hokkoda’s scepticism is completely justified.
We are aligned in our outlook good sir.
In order to “win” the statisticians, mathematicians have to be able to talk to the American people with their charts and times and the Dominion machines have to shown to do bad things, AND we need to be able to show that at such and such a time in states x, y, z, an algorithm led to Biden being awarded this for one vote while Trump was award that for one vote.
Televised. Experts.
Yes. Low chance they agree to hear it. Lower chance they agree this was unconstitutional. Lower still the remedy does anything positive for the Trump campaign.
It looks like Trump got caught with his pants down. No more “trust the plan” or “Jim’s blog says this was a sting and the military is involved. No more “Sun Tzu.” Trump was playing defense – Biden had to have the 3 big states, or 4/6 if he didn’t run the table on the larger ones. All the President had to do was deny Biden and neither would hit 270. Georgia has thrown a monkey wrench in this thing – they backstabbed the American people.
The Supreme Court certainly won’t want to save this country. At least 4 of them hate this country and the others want to stay in the good graces of the RINOs and media figures who run D.C. That the Court was lied to multiple times by Pennsylvania, and that multiple blue state governors continue to defy their rulings about the lockdowns does not seem to matter to them. McConnell, Grahamnesty and the rest will get paid. Red oligarchs will get low wage illegal alien workers. Blue oligarchs will get votes and power. Everyone at the bottom is who loses out, but the USSC doesn’t care about the forgotten man.
I think the idea is to throw this to the house and have the states vote It will not take much from the SCOTUS to make that happen each state one vote,Trump wins.
Giuliani outlined what you are suggesting, back when everything was getting ramped up. Twelfth Amendment has everything ready to go.
By the time this gets through the Supreme Court everyone in this country will have picked a side. Some Americans do not know there is a side to pick, they think Biden won, fair and square. Anyone that listens to the facts will know it is corruption and fraud. So if the Supreme Court does not rule in President Trump’s favorite, they will have a big problem on their hands.The entire China ownership of DC will come to the surface. This country will be begging President Trump to save the country in whatever way he needs to do it.
Eric, are you new here? You certainly seem to be submitting a lot of very, very pessimistic posts and I believe you were also the one that indicated that DNI Ratcliffe said the report on foreign interference was not coming until sometime in January but you were unable to produce a link to where he supposedly made that comment…
I’m not accusing you of being a concern troll, but I have been watching your posts and I do admit I’m a little curious as to whether any longtime Treepers remember seeing you before?
I remember someone named Eric posting here but can’t confirm he is the same person; but you are right, this person is quite negative
VikingMom, I occasionally play “spot the troll” in the comments section. Once you see their tactics they are easy to spot. Pessimism, negativity, redundant posts, argumentative, confrontational. Some are better than others but the tactics are always the same. They are also easy to ignore.
Another tell is the “I don’t trust (insert name of person on Trump team).”
Eric has been around awhile. He and Albertus Magnus are always downers.
VM, agree it’s another new plant sent here to undermine and demoralize.
“Eric”– Blah Blah Blah… Calling BS on your ignorant assessments:
Especially this unsupported non-sense: “The Supreme Court certainly won’t want to save this country.” Hey you win dumbest comment of the day!
Hello, the conservative leaning Justices are entirely motivated to take action. Otherwise they become the permanent minority after the Dems pack the court. You see Eric, if nothing else (which is doubtful) they are obviously self-motivated.
Clearly you have never had to serve on a government body in which you are in the minority. It sucks. And to be on that body FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE as with SCOTUS? NO Fugging way.
And it’s never occurred to you that being in a position to do the right thing for a nation of 300 plus million peopleis an exceptionally strong motivator? Being known forever as a hero?
Almost everyone discussing how the SC might act (or not act) skips one item: If they fail to act, pres. select JB Will pack the court and severely water down their power to the point of insignificance. Not one of them want to be responsible for their own diminished power. Therefore they kick it to the state legislatures and give themselves a pass.
My preferred analogy is that we’re down 5-2 in the 3rd period with 5mins to go on the clock. Get a goal and then things get intetesting.
Is this a hockey metaphor? Only thing I can think of where the 3rd period would be close to end game, and has goals.
Disagree completely with your MSM Legacy News “analogy”.
So sports fans, here’s the reality on the field: Trump clearly won, and the only problem is that some jackass has monkeyed with the electronic scoreboard.
In the end, its going to be up to us to take back the country, no one else…
From what I understand scotus has already agreed to hear it.
SCOTUS is forced to hear this one. And it’s not about Dominion or signatures or any of that stuff.
It’s about states making an end run around their own legislatures to change their election laws. In this case regarding mail-in ballots. And that IS unconstitutional. No if’s, ands or buts. Only state legislatures can change their own state’s election laws.
So if those states electors go to Trump as a result of Texas lawsuit, and then no one gets to 270, I believe the House decides who is our President.
However, it’s NOT a good thing that SCOTUS has NOT heard evidence on the Dominion voting system. It’s NOT good thing that a great friend asks, “How could anyone think Trump won?” because she watches network news (NOT CNN) and Stephen Colbert and she told me the whole thing about Biden being corrupt was wrong because a bunch of people in intelligence signed a letter saying it wasn’t true.
She’s one of probably over 50% of Americans who think network news is telling the truth.
Why do you say “toss the vote and unilaterally choose their electors, at which point they choose Biden electors anyway” ?
We’ll, because that would be maintaining the media and election officials’ “status quo.”
The thought is that maintaining status quo is always the path for any party that offers the least amount of objection and complication.
I think that the other means available to Trump are so drastic and will overwhelm our nation (we are talking about a military move and many arrests at once loads of folks going to GITMO and all of that) that he his letting all other options play out so we can go about the needed house cleaning at more relaxed pace and not roil the left as much. Plus I think President Trump prefers to get folks to turn rather than just sheer justice bringing the hammer. But I am not an expert.
This is such a high profile case… it is for all the marbles… if PDJT loses, all bets….
“(1) SCOTUS has to agree to hear the case”
SC asked for Def States’ by responses by 3 pm Thursday.
Obviously, they are going to hear Oral Arguments. Why else would they ask for responses?
Much to my suprise, Arizona joins the lawsuit! ?
May be why they weren’t named in the suit. Hard to sue yourself.
So weird… Why doesn’t this AG get his own house in order first?
That said, This will be interesting if others join, especially some of those who went dem (supposedly) – it lends credence to the idea that unequal access to voting and the criteria is bipartisan.
Read the brief Arizona filed and tell me what side the state is on.
I’ve read it twice, and I cannot tell.
Squsihy, vanilla, political BS wrapped in a legal filing.
Nope.
Link to the brief.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163258/20201209171850333_TX%20v%20PA%20Motion%20for%20Leave%20FINAL.pdf
Spread this to big twitter personalities, I can’t do it alone. Hillary admits on air asking for China to fund the Democrats, a HIGHLY illegal act.
This is one evil decrepit piece of filth. She truly is an evil presence and when God takes her, the Earth will be better off.
Only God could take her. I can’t imagine Satan would be comfortable with that level of competition.
Crooked!
Remember, this psychotic whore was the one who came up with the “Russia Conspiracy” in the first place. as proven by much documentation including the CYA briefing to 0bama.
I didn’t see a date, when did this occur?
Slightly off topic…
If SCOTUS rules either for a Trump slate of electors from the four defendant states or that it goes back to the respective legisilatures, how does that effect the other federal elections that could be equally suspect?
WOULD ONLY EFFECT THE PRESIDENTIAL RACE VIA THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE.
It would depend if the SC rules the mail votes illegal and thereby stricken from the totals. In that case, it could affect other races.
The won’t rule the mail-in votes illegal. If they even take the case, TX wins, and they issue a ruling, they will only say that the changes to election laws made by the State courts and the Secretaries of State were illegal, and only in the case of the Presidency since the suit pertains to the Electors clause. That’s nice and narrow, and SCOTUS likes nice, narrow, rulings. This approach allows them to basically tell voters that their votes were not illegal, the people who told them they could break the law are the ones responsible.
Whether they have the guts to do the right thing…that’s another story.
Or better yet, stricken the votes from the counties that broke the laws. Wayne County, MI, Philly and Allegheny PA, Milwaukee, WI, Fulton CO, GA.
any other affected party can apply to SCOTUS for the same relief. For example the PA legislators could apply directly to the SCOTUS and override the pretense that the governor has the power to block them (he does not have that power). There are state legislature powers enumerated in the US Constitution separate and superior to any state constitution or other inferior document.
Texas has unleashed a game changer.
My preference would be for the SC to (1) send the Presidential election to the house, due to time constraints, (2) invalidate all other elections, (3) call for new elections for all other positions, and (4) state that Dominion and similar systems that are subject to fraud may not be used.
The advantage of the TX lawsuit is that is narrow in scope, affects only the Presidential electors, and does not open the fraud can of worms. If they open the fraud can of worms, then all races in those states are suspect, and SCOTUS would have a hard time narrowing their ruling to just the Presidential election. If the election is fraudulent (as opposed to illegal rules changes), then all the ballots cast are in dispute for all elections in those states. I suspect that’s why Kelly’s request for the injunction was denied…tossing a couple million mail-in votes would have affected far more than just the Presidential election.
Test. If this posts please reply. Thanks!
Ha. Back in comments on a new device! Now if I could see the pop-up to save my name and email, I’ll be all set..
I didn’t see anything. Sorry.
https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/13.0.1/svg/1f923.svg
Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes is a fighter and a patriot, very grateful that we joined the fight even though we stand alone in the Mtn West. Any Treepers in Idaho or Wyoming? These states need to join the fight asap! Wings up and Godspeed Treepers, we will prevail!
lavender bue
Wyoming’s AG is not elected but appointed, and will not file unless told to by governor. Governor Gordon of Wyoming is likely to not be interested in this. I do want to be surprised.
I used to hang out with Sean’s father a lot. I knew that Sean Reyes would be itching to get into this fight. He and his father come from great stock.
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/529559-trump-asks-cruz-to-argue-texas-case
President Trump has asked Texas Sen. Ted Cruz (R) to present a case from his state’s attorney general seeking to invalidate the election results of several key battleground states before the Supreme Court should the court decide to hear the suit, The New York Times reported Wednesday.
Not overly excited Teds getting into the mix.
I agree. He can’t be trusted not to throw the case.
Remember: Unanimous Consent to stay in Pro-forma session to block Trump from making nominations without McTurtle gatekeeping for his entire first term, and now unanimous consent for Mike Lee’s whored out H1B payoff to Big Tech.
The Senate is corrupt, ALL of them!
Ted has experience arguing cases and winning at the SCOTUS
One of Alan Dershowitz top students at Harvard Law, Cruz a great option for this case imho a great legal mind
Ted wants to be President one day, he’s highly motivated to win. Also some saying he helped Paxson craft the case
15 States, D.C., Join Coalition to Award EC Votes to Popular Vote Winner
(National Popular Vote Interstate Compact)
CA, CO, CT, DE, (D.C.), HI, IL, MD, MA, NJ, NM, NY, OR, RI, WA.
https://www.newsmax.com/t/newshttps://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/996364
…
17 States File Amicus Brief With Supreme Court in Support of Texas Election Lawsuit ☝AL, AR, FL, IN, KS, LA, MO, MS, MT, NE, ND, OK, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, WY.
Notice anything?
Ooh boy a COALITION! The big bad blue states paid for by China have all agreed to basically a strongly worded letter. Should we act scared now?
RWG,
The States that have entered into the compact want a NATIONAL popular vote to elect the President.
They have shown no interest (not one) in assuring that the vote count is a legal one, because, Uncle Joe is “In” the lead… /s
If President Trump was “In” the lead do you think they would have joined the TX lawsuit??
I wonder how these states electors are going to vote??
From the link below…
The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact will guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes across all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The Compact ensures that every vote, in every state, will matter in every presidential election. The Compact is a state-based approach that preserves the Electoral College, state control of elections, and the power of the states to control how the President is elected.
https://www.nationalpopularvote.com/written-explanation
(Hyperlink in NEWSMAX article above)
Umm, nothing about this preserves the Electoral College.
Unconstitutional. The whole point of the electoral college is for electors to represent each separate and distinct state.
The USA is *not* a democracy where 2 large cities popular votes would decide every single election. We are a Constitutional Republic. It’s a whole nother animal. Think of that animal as a LION.
So we don’t have to act scared.. no. The Commies have not won anything but a trip to Gitmo if they’re lucky.
Democrats study our constitution for the same reason
the Orkin Man studies insects.
Agreed, Clivus.
And it would seem, imho, naive to believe they haven’t gamed out “Every” possible path and laid “Traps” for even the least likely.
That the Coalition of Evil self-identifies?
They do, TheOtherSean.
And they don’t care.
This l8nk might be more direct…
https://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/996364?section=politics&keywords=2020-election-electoral-college-votes&year=2020&month=11&date=10&id=996364
Secession is not out of the realm of possibility here, and if taken down to the county-level would eat significantly into the former states of NY, CO, NM and anything east of I-5 and the Cascades in CA, WA and OR.
Texas already has the legal right to secede. The Uniparty would have a hard time stopping the bleeding if other states decided to join the Republic of Texas.
Texas governor has eyes for the OVal.
Just heard a about this site that has collected in one place all the fraud in the various states. It was on Bill Whittle’s Right Angle. Book mark it while you can bc its already hard to find using the search engines. hereistheevidence.com Its a crowd sourcing site
Question…….
We now have a lawsuit at the SC where Texas, joined by 18 other states is suing 4 states for not following their states rules and laws with regard to the federal election.
Both sides will be able to present evidence possibly as early as Friday.
So what impact if any happens within the SC IF………
1) Ratcliffe publishes his report tomorrow or Friday stating THERE WAS Foreign Election Interference?
and/or
2) PT’s lawyers disclose the results of the Forensic Audit of those 22 machine and IF there is clear Evidence of Voting Machine Vote Manipulation?
Yep it seems evidence can be presented with this approach, unlike the appeals of the others if I am understanding things correctly.
It’s my understanding that the TX case is about the constitutionality of the illegal votes rather than the fraud. It would help in the case that the SC punts back to the legislatures to choose their electors…in this case, the states have more to fall back on politically.
They do not need evidence. The unconstitutional actions of the 4 states are patently clear. The SC should be able to announce their findings by Friday.
As far as 2) goes, that audit was in Michigan, which is one of the states being sued. So, evidence of election malfeasance simply adds to the pile of evidence that the runaway elections fiasco in these states created the opportunity for fraud. And, that the election law changes disenfranchised MI voters as well as the voters in the rest of America.
For 1) I think SCOTUS will be aware of it – because it WILL make news – but it has nothing to do with states that let non-Legislators rewrite election laws. Based on the deep penetration of China into our political/economic establishment, I don’t know if such a report would see the light of day.
Frustrating that I went to work today and none of the people I work with knew about the Texas lawsuit. They are ‘average joes’ who have a Facebook and watch local affiliates of the alphabet networks every evening.
Media is cancer.
Related, the Hunter Biden investigation is now front page, web site, of the Chicago Tribune, L.A. Times, and others. Where was that a month ago is a rhetorical question.
They are prepping the territory for Kamala, that’s all. Joe is senile, he can’t be meeting with world leaders and traveling abroad. He must be kept hidden. But that will not work IF he becomes POTUS. He can’t perform the job.
So what will Demoncraps do? Tell their voters they were fooled into voting for a senile, incapacitated man?
NOPE!
He will step down due to Hunter’s legal issues etc.
It’s all part of the plan.
Obama’s plan in action: Biden out; Harris, woman who earned not one primary vote, will be POTUS.
This is just in time to get Joe out of the way so Kamala can become president. That is what this has all been about. The media are now going to report on Hunter, and is now going to be a scandal tying up Joe. For the media and the left, Kamala is the scandal-free candidate.
We need to go back to her deal with Smollett
I saw one brief mention this morning on CNBC mentioning that the AG of Texas, who is under investigation of bribery charges (they had to throw that in there, of course) had filed a long shot suit in the Supreme Court against four states that “President elect Biden” had won.
The whole article was filled with innuendo and insults and very short on actual facts. It made no mention of any of the other states joining Texas. The article also did not bring up the Constitutional premise of original jurisdiction in explaining why the suit was filed with SCOTUS directly.
And THAT is what passes for independent, unbiased journalism today, which explains why our country is in the shape it’s in!
Anyone know why the Texas Solicitor General is not listed on the suit? Is it not usually the SG that represents states in front of SCOTUS and not the AG?
AG of Texas under investigation? Like Lt. Flynn?
Yep. Just like that.
Funny that 3 of four of my employee’s had and are blue collar but don’t watch the MSM to get there news.
AZ just joined the TX SCOTUS suit.
https://electionwiz.com/2020/12/09/breaking-arizona-joins-texas-election-lawsuit/
I wonder if TX will tell them no. Having AZ on “our team” may actually hurt us…gives the trouble makers a chance to say “but some of you states did this”.
Read the brief and tell me which side Arizona is pulling for.
I read it twice, and between chuckle, I couldn’t come up with the answer.
Squishy, politically delicate snowflake of a brief.
I posted a link to it here, easier this afternoon.
17 states and i hope counting is 1/3 the US states and there is quite a large total population. I would imagine with this united front, SCOTUS will have to take it and their decision can’t be a wishy washy send back to states. There has to be some universal simple decision. Midnight local time election day (with time zone consideration) would really be the most universal and precedent setting ruling…..and it gets Trump about 300 EVs.
The main issue for for the very,very top who perpetuated this massive fraud, they had to rely on dumb stupid libtards to carry it out. We all know democrats lack; rationale, judgement and commonsense ot they wouldn’t be democrats in the first place.
They demonstrate their incompetence at every level. They are means justifies the end evil. Can you imagine having to run anything with their innate incompetence. Throw-in a degree of mental insanity and see how successful you will be?
Andrew McCarthy has outed himself for the RINO we always suspected he was.
https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1336827267805110273
Was it ever in question? McCarthy’s obvious allegiance all along was to the George W. Bush wing of the democrat party. The lawyer version of John Solomon – trust the institutions, pay no attention to corruption, big things are coming.
Excellent article on this topic by Andrea Widburg at American Thinker. Comprehensive explanation of the Texas lawsuit:
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/12/the_texas_lawsuit_in_the_supreme_court_is_huge.html
Why hasn’t Bill Barr joined on behalf of the United States. Why haven’t the legislatures in these defendant states joined on behalf of their interests.
I think we all know the answer to that
Good question…….
Here is Barr’s Scorecard after 2 years as AG so you tell me why Barr has accomplished so little amongst all of this including 3 coups on a sitting President.
1) Uranium One – No Crimes, No Indictments
2) Hammer Spying Program & 47 Hard Drives of Evidence given to the FIB in 2015 – No Crimes, No Indictments (Note with what we are now seeing with allegations of Election Fraud via the Hammer & Scorecard Program, how big is this 2015 ignoring of evidence now?)
3) Anwan Brothers – No Crimes, No Indictments
4) HRC Unsecured Server & 33K Emails – No Crimes, No Indictments
5) Wiener Laptop Contents where the laptop and contents were given to the FIB – No Crimes, No Indictments (outside Wiener)
6) DNC Server Hack where the FIB never confiscated the server but took the word of a 3rd Party that it was hacked – Alleged Crime, No Indictments
7) Seth Rich murder where the FIB has refused all FOIA requests of any investigative reports – No arrests
8) Fake Dossier and fraud on FISA Court 4 times where there is unequivocal evidence the FIB knew the Dossier was a fraud in Jan 2017 and still submitted 3 more FISA requests using this lie – No Crimes, No Indictments
9) Years of FISA Abuse – No Crimes, No Indictments
10) Years of FIB/NSA Contractor Spying Abuse as documented by Adm Rodgers audit and Judge Collyer 99 page report where 85% of NSA Contractor 702 searches were illegal – No Crimes, No Indictments
11) Carter Page FISA Leak where the FIB has in its possession the Surveillance and Investigative report by SSA Dugan detailing the leaking of the traced FISA involving people in Congress – No Crime for Leaking (just one count lying)
12) Numerous other Classified Leaks – No Crimes, No Indictments
13) Numerous referrals to DOJ from Congress – No action, No Crimes, No Indictments
14) Numerous Agents violating policy – No Crimes, No Indictments
15) Ukraine WB fraud – No Crimes, No Indictments
16) Impeachment Fraud and made up narrative by House Leader and now we learn the FIB had the Biden Laptop all this time and NEVER spoke up while PT was impeached – No Crimes, No Indictments
17) Ukraine Money Laundering – No Crimes, No Indictments
18) Epstein Death – No Crimes, No indictments
19) Framing and Withholding exculpatory evidence and records in the Gen. Flynn case – No crimes, No Indictments
20) Phil Haney Murder – No Crimes, No Indictments
21) 31 Government issued phones used in Federal investigation all turned back in wiped – No Crimes, No Indictments
22) Two Laptop in the hands of the FBI since Dec 2019, while PT is being impeached – No Crimes, No Indictments
23) Possible obstruction of justice by EVERYONE in a position of authority within the FIB and DOJ who may have known about the contents of the Biden laptop and yet allowed PT to be impeached – No Crimes, No Indictments.
24) Massive evidence of voter and election fraud including possible software manipulation of votes – No crimes, No Investigation and No Indictments and yet Barr in the CNN video is so outraged over just the possibility of voter fraud but when we have massive evidence of voter/election fraud there is no outrage or massive investigation or confiscation of voting machines. Virtually nothing.
25) Over 1,000 affidavits of voter fraud, video of ballots being pulled out of suitcases, ballots being trucked across multiple states, thumb drives inserted into machines/computers, vote counting stopped in 6 states, observers sent home while thousands of ballots counted without dual observers present in the middle of the night, thousands of illegal votes cast from dead people, people who no longer live in the state, under age voters, voters who never requested a mail-in ballot and now allegations of voting machine software using fractional vote manipulation to move from PT to JB and so much more.
Seriously, look at this list and virtually NOTHING from Barr and our Government.
I’m not sure it is even statistically possible but here it is after nearly 2 years and 6 MAJOR NATIONAL SECURITY ISSUES:
Hammer Spying Operation
NSA Contractor Spying Operation
Russia Collusion Coup on the President
Impeachment fraud and Coup on the President
Biden Laptop
Voter and Election Fraud
A big fat ZERO from Barr and his DOJ. Where is the Justice?
Absolutely Absent IMO under AG Barr’s DOJ.
BF, your lists rock.
Did I miss the Las Vegas massacre?
IIRC there were two noose hoaxes and innumerable diversity seminars that occupied the fat doofus’s time.
Oh I forgot Barr’s own words on why he came back as AG……….
“Well, as I said in my confirmation hearing, one of the reasons I came back is because I was concerned that people were feeling there were two standards of justice in this country. And that the political and that the justice, or the law enforcement process was being used to play political games. And I wanted to make sure that we restore confidence in the system. There’s only one standard of justice.”
How’d he do America? How should he be remembered?
How should he be remembered? As a deep state fixer for his entire career!!
And don’t forget, Laura Ingraham vouched for him and said he was the perfect guy for the job.
As Attorney General his job is to represent the United States, by representing the interests of the Democrat Party, the Deep State, China, and RINOs. Subordinate to those interests is to protect the illusion of DOJ and FBI impartiality and professionalism.
It’s being reported the number of states is up to 21 joining Texas. These are: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia.
The 21st is Arizona.
https://lutchman.report/arizona-joins-20-other-states-in-texas-supreme-court-lawsuit-against-mi-ga-wi-pa-over-unlawful-election-procedures/
Arizona is a no go…
Link to Arizona’s filing: https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2020-12/TX%20v%20PA%20Motion%20for%20Leave%20FINAL.pdf
Not so sure about that reporting and couldn’t find verification in the links there. Last I heard Alaska, Kentucky, and Ohio were holding out.
Found the link dated today from the Missouri submission: https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1336774528777785345/photo/1
No Alaska, Kentucky or Ohio AGs listed but I guess an updated list later in the afternoon could have been filed.
I guess we’ll have to wait for the dust to settle before we know Who’s on first!
PA is joining in sprit!
That’s a good one! Their governor is reported to having tested positive for the virus.
17 States – 1/3 of the nation!
AOC recently doxxed the business address of Project Veritas, In retaliation, James O Keefe investigated AOC herself and discovered that nobody in the district she supposedly lives in, people who’ve lived there for 42 years, has ever seen her. Reminds me of that theory that AOC is just a paid actress with an artificial following and persona.
https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1336709465039581191
This has been known for some time. I read a similar article over a year ago.
People are saying that they don’t think SCOTUS will take up the Texas suit but I believe they will because they MUST know that if they don’t fix this NOW the left wing Senate (after GA cheats again)will “pac the court”. They will ALL lose their power. They surely don’t want 15 to 100 Supreme Court Judges.
Wrong take. Scotus will think that if they reject Trump that Biden will reward them with protecting the nine member court and not adding more justices.
At least 3 of them would love China to pack the court. It’s doubtful the rest of them care enough about court packing to take up this suit, or whether it would even enter their consideration.
I’m not a lawyer, but I think SCOTUS will not agree to hear the case because it’s such an untenable precedent. Do you honestly believe the 9 will sanction the right of one group of states to have the election results of four OTHER states overturned, while their own results get to stand? Talk about unequal justice…
They will read the suit filing, and the responses from the four states, and say, “Nope. We’re not touching this. Everyone has to live with the results that their states certified.” The Court’s participation in Bush v. Gore tarnished their institutional reputation, and taking the Texas case would DEFINITELY require “legislating from the bench”, which most would agree is a bad thing.
What word(s) in this statement are operative?
Donald J Trump
@realdonaldtrump
We will be INTERVENING in the Texas (plus many other states) case. This is the big one. Our Country needs a victory!
I don’t “get” what he means at all. Perhaps it’s just the Donald being the Donald, not always a chooser of the “right” word?
I’d rather have Sundance argue this case before The Supreme Court and that I would Ted Cruz
Then Ted Cruz
“than” Ted Cruz
Mark, you can edit now
It is a sad state in our nation’s history that the governors of states not standing with the President or working actively against him are potentially compromised and corrupted by the CCP:
SOS Pompeo spoke during the National Governors Association meeting. He warned the assembly of U.S. Governors who were on the 2020 CCP influence list. Pompeo tells the group that he knows of a list of U.S. governors the communists put together telling of their “friendliness” to China.
https://100percentfedup.com/video-mike-pompeo-warns-americas-governors-who-are-friendly-to-china/
Wake up America: China Joe Biden is in bed with the Chinese Communist Party. He sold out the U.S. in his dealings with China during the Obama administration and was handsomely rewarded. He is their man and a security threat to the survival of this nation.
Joe and all other politicians who are funded by the multinational big tech companies all want globalism back now so they can get back to business as usual and continue lining their pockets while we pay for it all.
So, if this gets to evidence presentation…shouldn’t evidence of the fraud be introduced to show “actual harm” caused by the Unconstitutional changes to these states’ voting laws?
It’s not an evidentiary court. They don’t re-try to determine guilt in criminal matters. To be considered by the US Supreme Court, there must be an unresolved federal question, some aspect of Constitutionality to be decided upon.
I believe in an original jurisdiction case SCOTUS operates as a trial court
That IS what I read today from ShipwreckCrew.
Haven’t read any comments yet, but I’ll say this looks most promising! I suspect the VSG is maybe dumping a truckload of rats onto the field for the slavering dogs to go in hot pursuit of, while he’s quietly putting the finishing touches on the MOAB he’s been building.
The whole country is watching the dirty laundry being aired out, the puppet media is in overdrive capping and spinning as fast as they can, and the gas lights are being turned up and down frantically. Meanwhile, nobody is paying any attention to Gitmo being expanded, the re-structuring of the Pentagon and DOD or the personnel changes happening.
The old spring is definitely returning to my step!
Like
You have got to hand it to PT, he has singlehandedly exposed some of the BIGGEST FRAUDS in DC.
i feel PT has to hold off on the EO until the DNI releases the report within the 45 days from the election.if it says there was foreign interference then game on.this could be the ace in the hole.if scotus drops the ball.Beings this went direct to the scotus they can’t throw it back to the states.so i would like to see them rule (foster v love) and declare all votes after election day void.this way they save face as letting the majority of states votes count, election day is set,if you as a mail in voter can’t get your vote in in time,tough luck buddy.
After SCOTUS sends this back to State Legislatures (assumed), it’s then that IF those Legislatures refuse to declare invalid votes as weighty enough to change the result of the election that this will go back to SCOTUS.
Some State results have to be voided so that neither has 270 votes, so how does a State do that? Is that a SCOTUS job?
It’s the Contingent election we crave.
Makes me wonder whether additional states could be added to the TX lawsuit beyond the original four. If AZ broke its own election law, that would increase the odds slightly that Biden would be denied 270. No sense trying to add NV, since it has a Democrat legislature.
You know, I keep hearing they might NOT take up the case…BUT by the Original Jurisdiction clause it seems once it’s filed they have adjudicate it (at what pace we dont know)…like when you file civil suit, the court of jurisdiction eventually has to hear the case, they cant just throw it out on their own…isn’t this what Original jurisdiction means?
Original jurisdiction is just that – the right to be the FIRST court to hear a case. The SC primarily has “appellate jurisdiction”. There’s a very narrow class of cases SCOTUS agrees to hear on an original jurisdiction basis. Here’s the simplified history:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Original_jurisdiction_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
ACTION REQUIRED WITHIN 16 HOURS –
Contact Your State Attorney General Office.Tell Them YOU Want Your State To File Amicus Brief With Supreme Court in Support of Texas Election Lawsuit.CONTACTS:
Alaska: Clyde “Ed” Sniffen, Jr | Phone: (907) 269-5100 | Fax: (907) 276-3697 | [email protected]
Kentucky: Daniel Cameron | Phone: (502) 696-5300 | Main Fax: (502) 564-2894 | Email: https://ag.ky.gov/Contact-Us/Pages/default.aspx
Iowa: Tom Miller | Phone: 515-281-5164 | Fax: 515-281-4209 | Email: [email protected] (If you seek a reply, please include your full name, mailing address, and daytime telephone number.)
Idaho: Lawrence Wasden | Phone: 208-334-2400 | [email protected]
New Hampshire: Gordon MacDonald | Phone: 603-271-3658 | [email protected]
Ohio: Dave Yost | Phone: 800-282-0515 | Web form: https://www.ohioattorneygeneral.gov/About-AG/Contact
Wyoming: Bridgett Hill | 307-777-7841 or 307-777-7886 or 307-777-7977 | Web form: https://ag.wyo.gov/contact-us
Great, I just contacted Xavier Becerra (kidding)
No, that’s Xavier Boocherio, according to Joe!
This post was heavily edited.
And not by me :/
not just file as amicae curiae but as participants! big difference! skin in the game, not just cheerleaders
I hope this isn’t another example of our President placing his trust in the hands of the WRONG person. Cruz is knowledgeable and has experience with SCOTUS, but he campaigned for the role.
Speaking of Databases………
I wonder if that database that they built using the Hammer Program and the NSA Contractor Spying Program from 2009-2016 was designed to gather the weaknesses / temptations of key DC elites, Congressmen and Judges and once complete was “accidentally left unprotected” for a foreign power to secure?
If true, it really would explain a lot of things.
What was it that that the Hammer WB said?
oh yes, here it is………
“I produced 600 million pages. If you printed out each page it would be thirty miles high stacked one on top of another. The information is very sensitive information. They collected google searches, credit cards, phone retcords, images, pictures, anything and everything, and they did it for one reason: LEVERAGE. They didn’t know when, but they knew sooner or later they would need that information to use for LEVERAGE against a person … The amount of information is mind-boggling, and I gave all of that to FBI Director Comey’s office.”
Things back then that make you go Hmmm now.
Arizona signed on as well, which makes 18!
Andrew McCarthy has an opinion
https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/12/texass-frivolous-lawsuit-seeks-to-overturn-election-in-four-other-states/
Ted Cruz doesn’t seem to think it’s frivolous. Cruz has won many cases before the US Supreme Court. How many has McCarthy won.
Cruz is 9-0 before SCOTUS
What a crock of horseshit he spews. SCOTUS has not dismissed the other case(s), they may very well be consolidated with this one.
McCarthy’s logic is that there is no case law establishing that one state has an interest in how any other state conducts its elections. Well, there’s a first time for everything. And as Robert Barnes has said, the Constitution itself is a compact among sovereign states, and the ingptegrity of that compact assumes that the various states follow the Constitution.
I know I will get slammed for this comment but I feel strongly about this as a Texan. I am a fan of the President but he is not perfect.
Why is the President stepping all over the Texas case before the Supreme Court?
This case is about the people of Texas and the State of Texas and their votes. By inserting himself into the process he is making it all about him. Even to the point of asking Senator Cruz to argue the case before the court. He has no business doing that whatsoever.
It is not his place to request Cruz to argue for Texas. Texas has their own attorneys and it is their decision. It may just taint the case because he is a candidate and clouds the original argument.
Cruz volunteered and Trump accepted.
PT knows Cruz wants to be a Supreme Court Justice.
Huge incentive for Cruz to fight like hell for PT in this case because if he is successful in his argument and PT gets a 2nd term then IMO PT will reward him with a SC spot.
IMO, PT likes it when his people have some skin in the game as they work harder for him.
No. Cruz declined to be a SC justice. He is looking at 2024 Presidential run.
He might change his mind; there’s a lot of prestige and perks having a lifelong appointment as SC justice.
imo, I don’t think he would have a real chance in 2024—he is not that personable and was even accused of cheating in the primaries in 2016 (Ben Carson). Now if Don Jr. stepped up, nepotism aside (if it is good enough for a Kennedy, a Cuomo…) he has potential in spades.
If he helps PDJT win this case, he will be frontrunner for 2024 GOP nominee.
Agreed. Would soothe plenty of old wounds with the MAGA base if he helped the President to a second term. He also knows if he loses POTUS is the unquestioned front runner in 2024
You do know Cruz is a Texas senator, right?
Because SCOTUS could argue that the 18 states have no standing. I believe the rationale is that the Administration strengthens it from a standing perspective.
Texas has a treaty with the US and it’s based on THAT.
Place yourself on the bench of the Supreme Court.
Now, Cruz is in front of you presenting who knows what.
How are you going to vote? Are you going to toss your homeland US of A into the dustbin of history because of 1) Cruz, 2) less than persuasive argument, 3) no standing by the plaintiff, 4) other?
No, you’re not. You will take whatever can be obtained that is in order, and if it suffices, you will vote for the better of our nation. If you can’t get a good product from the plaintiff, you vote your butt off anyway for the better of our nation. See how that works?
Is there a way in Georgia to see how you voted in the last election? My Grandson voted for Trump, first time voter. He is receiving, almost daily, mail to vote democrat. I am wondering how his vote was counted. Anyway to find out?
Months ago I mentioned that this mess hinges on the Equal Protection Clause of 14th Amendment. It hinges on the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment also (long story, which the lawyers will not get right away, if ever), but the EPC of the 14th is the key (and the lawyers do get that).
SCOTUS may go possum on this, but Texas and the these other states have the four they charge dead to rights on strictly and pellucid constitutional grounds, and everybody knows it.
The EPC of the 14th also, if anyone wants to push the matter — and the day is coming for that too — sweeps away Critical Race Theory, Affirmative Action, Female Empowerment, and all associated garbage favoring one aspect of the human family over another.
That and the federal statue which criminalizes, rightly, conspiring to infringe a person’s civil rights, a huge sally port against rioters, HR admins, and school admins should anyone want to use it.
The number of states is growing, but this shows the basic facts …
If you live in Alaska, Wyoming, Idaho, Kentucky, North Carolina, Ohio… CALL YOUR STATE’s AG tomorrow.
One phone call… do it!
Goodness, not only have I called but emailed and today, I called and left a message for our Lt. Governor. Not sure what is going on with AG Wasden. My husband also called and I contacted our local Rep., as well to put the word out. I will try again tomorrow! Will not let this sit without continually contacting them in Boise.
Thought I heard Kentucky had joined too at some point today. It’d be nice to have a contiguous border between my state (IN) and the rest of the Rebel Alliance if the pessimists are right.
That said, that map is a bit misleading… just need a few tiny yellow dots inside WI, MI, PA and GA representing the Uniparty strongholds. The rest of those states is with us.
18 states now with Arizona
I called governor’s office to complain Alaska isn’t onboard. We are also defrauded by the steal.
Be there or be square !!!
Alaska is in!
WHEN are you going to fix the word wrap issue on the comments?
Terrible to try to read!
oh my light’n up
Goodness we live on a spoiled, whiny country. He’s probably a legislator in Georgia
OMG, that is funny!
Test – new replies to my comments…
Finish test – also clicked the bell
I live in AZ. How this State had the gaul to join this is amazing to me.
We are just as corrupt as the states named!
Might be a legal tactic.
Would keep the Court from ordering them to do the same as defendants of the case
I too am here in AZ… IMHO AG Bronvich has future political aspirations… Ducey is done/finished/road kill in AZ… AZ AG Brono is trying to walk a fine line between the McStain stench that permeates our state, while sticking his finger in the air and gauging the direction of the political winds…
Regardless of AG Bronvich’ss motives, while his actual filing is weak, it does provide the cover the AZ Legislature needs to grow a backbone and act…
And in the event POS Rusty Bowers betrays us, it makes enough of a stink to get ONE US Congressman and ONE US Senator to contest the AZ electoral votes as invalid… That is the game and this move by AG Bronvich opens the door for all of us…
So counting Texas, it’s now up to 19 ?
It just occurred to me that there is one EV in Nebraska that some people were questioning. Is there any chance that could be flipped by the state legislature? I know it’s only one EV, but it could be low hanging fruit.
Yeah, Nebraska’s 2nd. I read somewhere that there was suspected fraud there too.