There is a level of no-so-subtle pretense within this messaging from President Trump that is not good.
As noted in this Truth Social message, President Trump notes it is unlikely that people around Chairman Xi and people around President Putin would be providing military, logistics, targeting or weapons support for Iran for the same reason President Trump is not providing military, logistics, targeting or weapons support to Ukraine.
TRUTH SOCIAL – “President Xi, at our recent meeting in Beijing, China, told me that he would not, under any circumstances, give or sell Weapons to the Islamic Republic of Iran — And that statement included Chinese Companies. Considering our relationship, I take him at his word and, besides, l am doing him very big favors, also.
Likewise, President Putin, despite the horrible War going on in Ukraine (The relationship remains, as it does with President Zelenskyy), told me that he would not sell Weapons to Iran. He understands that I do not sell Weapons to Ukraine, but to NATO Countries. They pay full price, and how those Weapons are distributed, I have no idea.
Therefore, two major Countries that people speak of often in terms of Iran are, in my opinion, not participating. If they did, it would be very bad for them — Certainly not in their best interests. Thank you for your attention to this matter!” ~President DONALD J. TRUMP
I strongly doubt non-pretending Russian President Vladimir Putin draws a distinction between the U.S. sending drone technology and missiles to Ukraine -vs- the U.S. sending drones and military technology to NATO Germany for forwarding to Ukraine.
As a consequence, if China is sending weapons, tech or military support to Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Pakistan or Turkmenistan and that material ends up in Iran by proxy, then Beijing is doing nothing different than President Trump using France, the U.K, Poland or Germany to support Ukraine. Gentleman’s geopolitical handshakes notwithstanding.
At a certain point, each country has to evaluate their risk vector against the reality of a geopolitical dynamic being driven by U.S. interests that are not necessarily under the command and control of U.S. President Donald Trump.
The newly defined “unelected” political version of ‘western democracy’, represented by Brussels, Ukraine and the U.K, all of which have political leadership as an outcome of selection not election, creates very dynamic risks.
Things have changed rapidly in the past 15 years. Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin is very exposed to those “new democracy” risks as was Muamar Khadaffi before him. Remember, the attacks against Libya were a NATO operation, led by NATO Allied Commander General James Stavridis. Show me in either policy or practical reality where NATOs interests were threatened by Libya; yet NATO led the regime change attack. That’s why, in this context, I select 2012 as the modern origin of this new NATO unelected democracy building.
Bottom line – Is China or Russia providing non-weapon support for Iran? Well, if they followed the USA model in providing non-weapon support for Ukraine, the answer is it’s quite possible.
Perhaps this {{nudge, nudge – wink, wink}} geopolitical brinkmanship explains the not-so-subtle shift in USA and Trump’s policy support in favor of Ukraine. Whatever the cause, things are less stable than before, and we are stuck in Military depletion mode while operating intensely against Iran.
Remember, in our conversations at the Treehouse, we accept things as they are not as we would prefer them to be.
Warn off China & Russia, then bomb the shit out of Iran’s infrastructure, military and religious ruling class.
just bomb the Iranian religious ruling class & military. I see our potential opportunity to help rebuild the country, via other middle east partnerships. An oil platform outside of the Strait would be a huge advantage.
Think back to WWII. Take out the infrastructure–power, water, roads, bridges, rails, runways, ports–all of it. That is exactly what it is going to take to put spines in the Iranian citizens who “say” they want change but then sit meekly by as the Iranian regime uses and abuses their citizens at will. Most Americans say they want freedom, liberty and justice but talk is cheap, especially when confronted with leadership that is becoming increasingly Socialist/Communist.
I don’t understand why Trump doesn’t bomb the shit out of every Iranian port and airfield so they cannot get anything into or out of their Country. This should have been done weeks ago. Everything along their coastline of the Strait of Hormuz should have been obliterated.
Plus declaring a no-fly zone over the entire country and destroying the main rail and road bridges in Iran over which military supplies can be brought into the country by land, and in particular from the northeast (Turkmenistan), which is the primary land route from China. Do as much as possible to isolate the country so as little as possible can be sent in to help the regime last longer.
The closer you drive Iran to the brink, the sooner they’ll hit the desalination plants of SA and create a situation where tens of millions of Saudi will die of thirst. And that will destroy the Kingdom and the economy of the world
And next on the agenda is hitting all of Israel’s nuke facilities and turning them into mega Chernobyl situations
And you still won’t force open Hormuz
Let’s not forget the railway from China.
Those unelected bureaucrats in Europe are chomping at the bit to charge Trump with war crimes. The next democrat president will be more than happy to hand him over.
We must unite the right under the banner of never allowing the DemSocs into power again—at least until they change back into an American political party. Will we all get who we want in Congress or the Oval Office? Nope, but we won’t get communism, and Trump can be a happy grandpa. We owe him that at least.
I’m sure there’s a gated community that has a sign at the entrance “Religious Ruling Class”.
It’s a mistake to destroy civilian infrastructure and completely unneccessary.
0.o
I thought this was obvious in the beginning, Ukraine is a US proxy war against Russia with various countries contributing, and the US war with Iran is a Israeli proxy war with Iran using it’s military arm, the US.
China and/or Russia helping Iran is the same as Europe helping Ukraine.
USA technological military supplies can be depleted to an undesirable ability to respond to conflicts because of very probable proxy war with Iran.
This is much of why China has been working on a stranglehold of so many critical minerals that are necessary for industry and advanced technologies. Most if not all of those resources are irreplaceable in building those things.
It also speaks volumes of those that allowed China over the years to corner the markets on so many crucial resources.
If not for decades of insane environmental regulations and lawsuits we would be able to provide most of those critical minerals from right here inside the United States, and at one time we did. Some of that is starting so loosen up due to recent Trump administration actions, but reversing it takes time. China cornering the available markets on so many of those minerals has been entirely self-inflicted.
The CCP and Soviets before them long supported all these environmentalist groups in the United States and elsewhere (watermelons really) so I would not say it was entirely self-inflicted.
Israel ya say? Note to self: ignore comments from charles.
You might want to keep in mind that ignore is the root word of ignorant.
Ignore as you like. But Charles is largely correct.
You made the list. I should really write this stuff down.
And another “Blame it on the Jews” voice is heard from.
Duly noted.
I can’t believe you got 17 thumbs up for that statement. The US is not a “proxy” for Israel. Iranian religious extremism and terrorism is the enemy of our country, and the planet. They cannot continue as they have for the past 47 years! The Ukraine is not terrorizing the world. It is about a lot of people making money with way, and that is not the same as religious terrorism around the world.
The Ukraine was being set up as a staging ground for the takeover of Russia and the Arctic, among other things that outlining would amount to an epistle.
And the Ukraine not a proxy war between the US and Russia.
The US is trying to get out of the globalist-backed and instigated conflict in the Ukraine.
Iran was gearing up to destroy Israel and they were/are also a clear and present danger to all the other ME countries to the point that everyone got together and said to Iran, “ENOUGH” and proceeded to put a stop to it.
Iran is not a proxy war being fought on behalf of Israel necessarily.
0.o
I have and always have supported POTUS from the escalator to today. That being said I believe the Iran operation was a major error in judgement/timing I am sure was foisted upon him by certain “advisors”. Whatever we need to do now to extricate ourselves from the situation while at the same time assure that we prevent the crazies from building a nuke is going to require some very skilled maneuvering and careful planning. God be with us…..
You cannot reason with crazy.
The “crazies” being the radical Muslims, right?
You should take the time to listen to Senator Sheehy speech posted here then. Iran is our mortal enemy who wants to brutally murder every single one of us.
And they’ve been shouting that for 45 years.
The real threat is the dragon hiding behind the curtain.
Can’t they both be a threat?
And they have been doing it for 45 years.
The US government is far more of a threat to the American way of life and our freedoms than a bunch of mooselim crazies.
Assassinations, mass shootings, Antifa, BLM, massive vote fraud, and the list could go on and on. Many think 911 was a domestic operation and for a long time I rejected that. I no longer reject it after watching what these people have done to Trump and his folks starting in 2016. 911 was our government attacking its own people.
Our government is our biggest enemy and threat and both political parties will bend a knee to the deep-state….always. Trump has been a small road bump, but he’ll be gone soon enough.
The mullahs are part of a death cult and the entire reason they were unable to obtain/build a nuclear weapon was that everybody knew exactly what would happen if they did. Trump, thankfully, is President during the time in which Iran’s leadership closed in on developing the nuclear weapon without further outside assistance (and they’d already had years and funds aplenty to develop the long-range missiles to carry it).
Basically we ran out of road to kick the can down.
Yes- God be with us, Amen. Continual prayers for President Trump, his administration, our nation & so many other prayers.
Sounds like you haven’t been paying attention…
both iran and ukraine were foisted on him. the deep schitt state and his deep schitt state advisors made him an offer even he couldn’t refuse is my guess. demonstrate a very low yield neutron detonation on one of iran’s key non-civilian infrastructures to show them how well they work and why we don’t need conventional weapons if we run out. stop diddling around with these taqiyya mumbling tribesmen.
No better reason to finish off the IRGC totally and completely. Without doing so, China and Russia will just feed the more supplies and technology than every. They will end up in an even better position, and the World a way worse one.
Finishing off the IRGC totally and completely is about 1,000 times easier said than done.
Not to mention such a tactic would “finish off” a whole lot of Iranians who just wanted to live their best lives. I don’t think going down with the IRGC ship was on their radar when they wanted the U.S. to step in and help them.
The breakthrough between Russia and America is when America gives Ukraine to Russia and Russia gives Iran to America.
While Trump spoke of kinetic weapons, which are indirectly routed through NATO countries, Starlink, targeting, and espionage (for military targeting) is being directly provided to Ukraine by America.
I frankly don’t think Russia will accept any dictated peace. They are very likely seeing the Ukraine conflagration. As one between Russia and the West. To that end, US weapons aren’t an indirect aid but a direct one.
The reason we live on the edge is that if America/EU pushes Russia to fall, while falling, it will likely launch 5000 nuclear warheads towards what they see as the source of their fall. It won’t be Ukraine.
Has anyone asked ratcliffe to stand down in ukraine yet?
Over in one day indeed…
Glad you stated the obvious Sundance. My sister had two friends fighting. One asked for a hand full of leaves to stuff in the other’s mouth. My sister obliged then both of her friends got mad at her because she provided the leaves. That and the comment on his way home when President Trump said he was considering providing patriot missiles to Ukraine right after a great, long talk with Putin regarding our 250 celebration. Hiding in shadow don’t give you total invisibility and helping by providing leaves doesn’t mean you didn’t provide the attack weapon. Ask my sister.
Russia has self-reported sending food and medicine, humanitarian aid to Iran recently. Is China sending Iran materiel for drones and ballistic missiles? It seems probable, but more evidence is needed.
Would we back down from liberating the Iranian people, if China or Russia objected? Russia has its hands full. China is thirsty for oil and must be in short supply, so it is directly affected by the war, aside from Iran being China’s proxy. Evidence of China pulling strings with its made men in the United States should become more obvious. We need a list of countries and prominent individuals worldwide, who are on Team China. Likewise for Team USA to compare. It would improve our understanding of the situation.
As long as we support Ukraine, or any other adversary to either China or Russia, we have no justification for asking them to refrain from same.
Simple isn’t it. Yet…
Maybe it’s a case of we know what you (China and Russia ) said vs what you are actually doing so we can play that game too.
That would clarify this from SD above:
“Perhaps this {{nudge, nudge – wink, wink}} geopolitical brinkmanship explains the not-so-subtle shift in USA and Trump’s policy support in favor of Ukraine.”
I certainly agree. Sounds like we are being a bit hypocritical to me.
There’s asking and demanding, though. Asking doesn’t carry a military threat (in my opinion) but rather the usual Trump pressure based on the other country’s economic future with the consumer capital of the world, after the guns go quiet.
As of this moment, militarily, the United States IS the Western World.
To the extent we are feeding weapons to Europe/Ukraine or to the middle east, we are doing it alone, and to the depletion of our other theaters and security interests.
We must never lose sight of protecting the homeland itself, both militarily and economically. Because no other power will assist us in doing so. They can’t even protect themselves. That should be more than clear now.
Our so-called “allies” are bankrupt, increasingly industrially incapable, and pathetically unarmed at this point below the strategic level (nuclear weapons). That is a simultaneously precarious and very dangerous situation.
I read this morning that the UK military has only 20 operational tanks, not enough to even defend a town. They asked Germany to loan it ships for a recent joint exercise. They are a shadow of even Thatcher’s UK. France and Germany are only marginally stronger conventionally.
They will not help us. Neither here at home, or in regions that impact them more directly. Because they are unable to do so. PDJT is correct to put them on notice to get ready to defend themselves.
We are the lonely Goliath right now on the world stage. With the increasingly desperate Chinese dragon sniffing around, looking for openings and weakness, directly and through its proxies.
A Russia standing with us, and not against us, would be a welcome development, as PDJT retakes our Western Hemisphere and pushes China out of it.
President Trump could secure Russia’s friendship by withdrawing from NATO and terminating the weapons deal we have with NATO/Ukraine.
Withdrawal from NATO will not be permitted by our Congress. Remember that the last NDAA passed before President Trump returned to the Oval Office explicitly denied him the ability to unilaterally withdraw the United States from NATO.
If NATO is to be disbanded it must be by other means.
Axis of evil Ian, Russia and China ???
I never trusted Ian.
“Whatever the cause, things are less stable than before, and we are stuck in Military depletion mode while operating intensely against Iran?”
Maybe depleting us has been the plan all along and boogeymen narratives of various kinds were created and fed to us for our successful consumption as a distraction?
Maybe a peaceful people shouldn’t have allowed such broad military adventurism in their name?
Maybe we should have minded our own business instead of bringing freedom and democracy to others around the globe at the end of the barrel of a gun?
Maybe we should have stayed on the gold standard?
I suspect our comeuppance is coming soon.
I’m quite certain that President Putin has told President Trump that there is no difference whatsoever between giving Ukraine weapons, and selling weapons to NATO…which then gives the weapons to Ukraine.
It’s a distinction without a difference. In my opinion, it’s also a mistake.
I just see a NOD to Putin, … Trump is implying … if Russia is going to attack someone, … Trump doesn’t have a problem with PUTIN going after Z and Europe!
This gives TRUMP a buffer zone, … Putin needs to unload his frustation at someone, … Trump is just nodding … hit Z and EU first, and then if that doesn’t work … Trump and Putin can discuss this in gentleman way … before duking it out. It would be a big mistake for Trump to take HARD action against Russia. EA needs to have a bloody nose, so their people experence the rages of war.
China… does have to be careful, intel … will tell the story. Also China/Russia stay away from IRAN.
possible Rich, IMO.
is there something more afoot?
could this already have been back-channeled?
from yesterday:
“Marco Rubio Answers Media Questions from ASEAN Summit
After Meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov
July 23, 2026 | Sundance
During the questions, the meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov
was one of the key areas of focus.”
big believer in dot connecting, just might have to reorder string soon. 🤓
” … I do not sell Weapons to Ukraine, but to NATO Countries. They pay full price, and how those Weapons are distributed, I have no idea.”
This is a distinction without a difference. And, it’s irresponsible to supply the EU with any weapons, knowing full well that they wish to provoke WWIII.
Trump may be over a barrel, USA Industral milatary MACHINE likes making billions of dollars selling weapons to anybody. Trump told USA military complex not to sell Z stuff. So Trump says, sell to Europe instead of having USA buy these weapons to send to Z.
Well, this buys us some time, and deflects from Deep State attacking Trump Admin, … war machine makes profit … and Trump … states … Listen folks, usa is not equiping Z, Europe is … and EU is paying top dollar for USA stuff. Win/Win. Putin is being pounded, and I’m sure Russia people need to take it out on someone, … Trump says take it out on Z and EU. Once Putin unloads on EU it will remind EU of the cost of WAR and the toll on their elections.
Deep State went behind Trump’s back in the past, … weapons went to Z, and CIA kept stuff from Trump. You are not wrong, but, … Trump just doesn’t want WAR (nuke) stuff. Keep the conflict in Europe. Seems wise to me. Although, … there is risk of WW 3.
Oh Sundance – President Trump may not be personally providing Ukraine ‘With military, logistics targeting or other support ‘
Pull the other one.
Is it 200 300 or 500 hundred billions the US taxpayer has sent them ?
Drones will be reigning down on Russia for decades after the war is concluded. Putin’s only option is to annihilate Ukraine.
I beg to differ … “we RECOGNIZE things as they are …” and do not have to “accept them as the are” … this is the essence of the environment that spawns discussion and debate.
Furthermore, this goes for situations on an issue by issue by basis.
Acceptance = Agreement … which means supporting President Trump does not mean one necessarily accepts all of his positions and actions, by default.
It’s a straw man argument. I’m old enough to know that although I’m not a Putin is the devil individual. I’ve seen enough to know that regardless of the circumstances Russia would be assisting Iran in some manner that’s counter to the US interests. So nothing has changed. Russia is providing weapons to Iran period. China will also do anything to be an adversary to the US. So nothing has changed and nothing new. Bomb Iran into the stone age if necessary.
President Trump is live right now with a whole bunch of people gloating about the nuclear mini-reactors for the data centers.
RSBN is covering it.
0.o
This is what geopolitical pretending not to know looks like. The aim is to prevent unwanted escalation while maintaining freedom of diplomatic action to deal with bilateral problems on other issues.
It’s a dance, indeed. And not a swing-yer-partner-round-and-round dance. More a Bolero….Ravel-style.
Casualty Ratio TrendsThe imbalance in losses has widened dramatically over time. For much of the conflict, Russia suffered between two and three casualties for every Ukrainian casualty. However, by early 2026, this ratio had climbed to nearly 8:1, meaning eight Russian soldiers were killed, wounded, or missing for every one Ukrainian casualty. This shift reflects Ukraine’s increasingly effective use of defensive positions, drone warfare, and artillery against Russian attritional tactics.
Which is why the Ukrainian’s are: on their 18th mobilisation, still losing territory, give back 20 corpses for every one Russian in exchanges, have sacked their defence minister, forcibly recruited physically and mentally unsuitable candidates and largely rely on drones, static warfare or frontal assaults that kill or injure the majority of the participants.
Simply put, if Russia was losing 8:1 the war would not be being fought by them the way it currently is, if Ukraine were inflicting such lopsided ratios they wouldn’t be fighting it the way they do now.
The biggest trouble though with following the Ukraine narrative, and the sources that bolster it, is that it comes from the same people who have engineered all the other fictions we’ve been forced to endure for decades. You can claim that this particular narrative reflects the truth but personally I follow the ‘fool me once’ maxim.
“we accept things as they are not as we would prefer them to be.”
I’m pretty sure that’s the situation President Trump finds himself more often than not.
Past time to deliver final blow and leave.
Final blow has 3 parts:
1). Make the rubble bounce at ANY known or suspected site that would be involved in any nuclear development. E.g. — Oickaxe mountain should be leveled now.
2). Destroy any and all remaining military assets capable of interdicting Hormuz traffic.
3). Destroy all comms, pipelines, bridges, and power lines that support Iran’s oil industry. In addition, take out the power stations that feed Kharg Island….and Tehran.
Then leave with this admonition: any attack or action to block or charge ships thru Hormuz will cost you another power stations that feed. Every time.
Russian Foreign Minister Lavarov made it very clear how Russia feels about US involvement in the Ukraine at his ASEAN Address last week, “the US is directly responsible for strikes made from the Ukraine into Russia…”, made it very clear there is no distinction or blurred lines.
As for 2012 being a benchmark for NATO becoming an offensive alliance … I agree 100%, some may go back to NATO Balkans operations but those were in NATO’s backyard or agreement to call Afghanistan a NATO Operation … However, Libya was a clear assault on a Nation that was NO ESTABLISHED Threat NATO. In fact Gadaffii was going the extra mile to rein in terrorists, who were forming “rebel movements” vs his rule. Need to add the US has yet to whisper even a hint of being disagreement on NATO’s new posture, no matter where one draws the line … to date even President Trump’s disagreements are over MONEY and DUES paid and not NATO’s new Military Strategic Posture of being an OFFENSIVE MILITARY ALLIANCE.
It could even be argued that President Trump was counting on NATO support given all the “serious and dire” declarations made by NATO members that something had to be done about the THREAT POSED by Iran and the precedent of NATO participating in Afghanistan vs a threat much less serious … unfortunately just as he found out about the Congressional Republicans in 2017 .. while the same goes for the dire declaration made by members of congress v/v the need to address Iran … all the declarations were just hot air public pronouncements made for sound bite generation, once President rump decided to take those declarations of the need for action to the kinetic level.
So ending the Ukraine war is now just a pipe-dream and Trump is up to his ears in Iran and will be for the long term. There are no “deals” with mooselims. You either turn their country into an ashtray or this goes on and on like all of the Forever Wars.
Trump got suckered into Iran by the same people that helped Bush justify Iraq with the “weapons of mass destruction” lie. It wasn’t bad intelligence. It was an intentional fabrication to justify military action that cost us many lives, many disabled veterans, and trillions in taxpayer money.
Trump talked big about stopping money, weapons, and intelligence to support Ukraine. He also promised to get us out of other people’s problems and conflicts. He has learned quickly he doesn’t have the power to do this. It’s above his pay-grade. The money will go there with his approval or not, same with the weapons. His cute little thing about “weapons to NATO…..” is just a way for him to save face without having to admit he has no power to stop it. The bootlickers in America might buy that crap, but the Russians and ChiComms have no interest in bootlicking Trump…….
We are discussing the country Soetero sent billions of ca$h on skids to. Every decision has a consequence.
I wish I had the fig leaf franchise to sell to USA,RUSSIA,CHINA – I would own a really nice private island.
Pogo
Thank you for this.
I always wondered why Trump stopped bombing Iran and looked for a diplomatic solution for months when you could see Iran was not serious. The only thing that made sense to me was we were running out of missiles and other offensive weapons and we were the ones stalling for time to replenish those weapons.
“We are stuck in Military depletion mode”. Bigly! And does the United States have the industrial capacity to not stay depleted? Russia sure seems to have that capacity!!
First line of the article:
”There is a level of no-so-subtle pretense within this messaging from President Trump that is not good.”
Thank you, Sundance, for not pretending.
For some reason Ukraine is the game. Has been since before 2014. If there is ever a massive turnaround of our stultified, Uniparty country, it will not happen by approaching the Ukraine game head-on. It is too big.
There will be a dark time before NATO/”globohomo” is defeated, wherein it will feel like we’ve lost everything, even our leadership. Otherwise the impossible battle can’t be won by the small minority.
Indistinguishable from defeat–I know. This is when faith, and all the other virtues that we should bone up on, will be necessary.
“As noted in this Truth Social message, President Trump notes it is unlikely that people around Chairman Xi and people around President Putin would be providing military, logistics, targeting or weapons support for Iran for the same reason President Trump is not providing military, logistics, targeting or weapons support to Ukraine.”
I think the key word here is targeting: there isn’t much value to most countries in having medium to long range ballistic missiles without having the advanced satellite acquisition and targeting technology that only a relative handful of countries possess.
So I think when you see Iran making precision strikes on targets hundreds of kilometers away it would imply they are getting assistance from someone.
Bomb them into oblivion and create the Oman canal
There is a dynamic here that is being overlooked.
Sundance has stated there is a system of “reverse fascism” in place … whereby the Major Financial Masters “centrally” directed-controlled the operations of a Global Corporation … with nations being the franchises of the Corporation. The UN and BIS are directly controlled executive agencies …. with the WEF being an academic policy development tool.
All the national franchises are competing for the best possible seats on the Board of Directors, within the Global Corporation. That is the reality today.
When specifically looking at Iran … they are a National Franchise financed and chartered as a corporate agent of Chaos, globally via radical Islamic movements world wide with IRGC … and the Iranian home from actions in Gulf of Arabia and inside Iran (Nuclear Weapons). In some places the Drug Cartels and Islamic IRGC efforts actually overlap or are allied (i.e. Venezuela, Colombia, Honduras, Cuba, Canada, EU, etc.).
Sure the Nuclear Threat is the stated catalyst but there is a much a larger
The EU Franchise, Russian Franchise, China Inc. Franchise and Controlled-Aligned US Government assets are aligned to protect the agents of chaos … Iran and Cartels … to put the US back into it’s assigned role of being a Services and consuming oriented franchise. Iran stops to negotiate tomorrow if the US gains enough support from the other Major Franchises.
In the bigger picture set against the Global Corporation .. President Trump is the first post 1988 President attempting to carve out a much stronger position for the US Republic (Franchise) and it’s citizens … beyond being a Services Provider and Consumer Market (i.e. the Trillions of $$$, our livelihoods and our Civil Rights are at stake).
China is the major recipient of Iran oil and the cash that Osama and globalist handed over to Iran.
Them assbackwards prehistoric terrorists don’t have the smarts to run drone curtains that China is operating from Beijing.