CTH begins every outline of the ongoing Durham investigation with the following disclaimer: How is John Durham going to reveal everything that is possible about the deep state Trump targeting operation, and simultaneously handle the involvement of Robert Mueller, Andrew Weissmann and the Special Counsel team who were specifically appointed to cover it up?
Thanks to a more detailed filing by John Durham last night {pdf here, h/t Techno}, we can now see the guardrails, rules and general direction the prosecution is taking.
In essence, the underlying Trump-Russia conspiracy theory material from the Clinton campaign, via Rodney Joffe to Michael Sussmann, was fabricated – likely for a dual purpose:
(A) to coverup and make excuses for the stunningly embarrassing, potentially unlawful and politically terrible April 2016 DNC email leaks, which showed the DNC Club internally working to secure the nomination for Hillary Clinton, while trying to destroy her primary opponent, Bernie Sanders.
and
(B) to create the political Russia narrative against Trump, to be deployed later in the general election.
Within the general direction Durham is following, the FBI was duped by a purposeful and manipulative intent from the Clinton campaign. Meanwhile, the CIA [Agency-2] did not buy into the technological evidence saying it was not “technically plausible” and was “user created and not machine/tool generated.”
For a complete breakdown of the legal filings and what they mean on a detailed level –
–Read Techno Fog Substack Here.
The prosecutorial approach by John Durham positions all of the corruption outside the institutions of government, thereby protecting them.
The bad guys, the corrupt lawbreakers, are the people directly connected to the Clinton Campaign and all of the political and legal agents in/around the Clinton political machine.
As the prosecutorial narrative is unfolding, the institutions of government were victims to the horrible, terrible activity by the Clinton outsiders.
Pay no attention to the aligned politics and weaponization of the White House, DOJ, DOJ-NSD, FBI main, FBI-CoIntel, CIA, Senate Intelligence Committee, or memberships therein. The entire apparatus of the most robust, capable, excellent and diligent intelligence apparatus in the history of all mankind, along with all the oversight mechanisms that exist to support that apparatus, was duped by Hillary Clinton’s team.
That’s John Durham’s investigative thesis, and the court filings show he’s sticking to it.
Many understood that the selection of Durham by the deep state actor Bill Barr was meant to be a cover-up operation, as Durham did such a bang up job whitewashing the CIA torture investigation.
Refer to United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Bill McSwain. McSwain confirmed Barr’s successful attempt to stop McSwain in his investigation into 2020 election fraud in PA in a letter he wrote to President Trump. Trump has since refused to endorse McSwain in the Republican primary for PA Governor.
Yeah, I don’t understand why Trump turned on McSwain. I thought his going public with the Barr interference was a good thing and have no idea what more Trump thinks he could/should have done
McSwain took an oath of office to support and defend the Constitution of the United States. McSwain should have gone public at the time he was told by Barr to shut down the investigation into PA election fraud as an illegal and unlawful order by the Attorney General. He could have sought protection under the Whistleblower Protection Act. If that didn’t force Barr to back off, McSwain should have resigned his position as US Attorney. Then Trump would have been happy to endorse him for Governor for doing the patriotic thing.
Maybe call the boss. “Say President Trump, you will never believe what Biily Bob Barr just did” something like that. Instead he participated in the coverup of the election fraud. Now he pretends otherwise. Mcswain is the worst.
But how does Durham avoid the memo that the CIA sent to Comey & Strzok back in September 2016 stating that they had info the Clinton campaign was spreading disinfo to distract for her email problems? That document is out there, I remember seeing it. Because if Durham wants to go with the story that they were duped, it means he has to somehow say that the CIA never shared that info with anyone else and never corrected them when they pursued Trump. The “they were duped” scenario would still drag the CIA into the blame game
Oh…
Let me get this straight.
The GOVERNMENT was duped by a politician.
GTFOH
No,they wanted to be duped.
Democrats aiways claim that Republicans are either duped, stupid or incompetent.
The Democrats would be right. No?
i think the same could be said about both parties leaders .
Yes, and it’s just about the most textbook case of recurring projection ever.
Just because it is projection doesn’t mean it’s ipso facto wrong.
Or bought. Hard to disagree with the Dems on this.
George Carlin was correct about the club .
As an intel entity in the Vietnam era, I find it highly unlikely that they (FBI) were duped! We (the good guys) had all the top of the line, latest and greatest equipment, personnel, technology, you name it. Our computer took up the space that a NAPA store would use. This was in the early 70’s. We knew stuff the pols never dreamed possible at that time. Times do change, but I have my doubts that the Government was duped! There’s more than what they’re letting on!!! We’re NOT GETTING DAZZLED here! I think it’s a lot of baffling going on. IMHO
Key Deep State and leftist catch phrase, plausible deniability.
I pray that plausible deniability meets accountability soon. Our country depends on it.
I know, just like cybercom, NSA, etc, has no record of electronic election interference but keeps a record of every form of electronic communication on planet earth. LMAO.
Did you all already know that James Baker is now Deputy General Counsel at twitter? He goes by Jim now, apparently. https://www.linkedin.com/in/jim-baker-234a4724 I wonder what info he still has access to thanks to his clearance, or did Trump take it away?
Mass executions of communist democrats will need to happen before we can even begin to think America will survive another 20yrs. #MAGA
The fix starts this year. We need to get the House and Senate majorities back.
You really think that would work? Even if every politician in America was a so called republican we would not be any better off.they all suck and care nothing about we the people. Nuke DC
Putin could do us a solid with nuking DC !
He’s too clever.
DC being effed up suits his purposes. They hurt Americans far worse than Putin can.
I’m not yet convinced that Durham is protecting anyone. I’m thinking he’s revealing just enough to win the case against Sussman and pursue any other cases he’s working on. This one statement from a Durham filing gives me hope:
In addition to [Onorato and Sears’] representation of [Danchenko], a separate lawyer at [Schertler Onorato Mead & Sears] is currently representing the 2016 “Hillary for America” presidential campaign (the “Clinton Campaign”), as well as multiple former employees of that campaign, in matters before the Special Counsel.
Also giving me hope, the day after Barr appointed Durham Special Counsel, the cretins at Lawfare wrote about how Biden’s AG could remove Durham. (https://www.lawfareblog.com/statutory-authority-barrs-appointment-durham-special-counsel) They were fearful of the expansive scope, “Durham can investigate anyone who potentially violated any law that is in any way connected with the investigation of the 2016 election.” They also pointed out that Barr specifically ordered that a report be created at the end of the investigation and acknowledge that even though Biden’s AG doesn’t need to release it to the public, there will be pressure to do so. If Lawfare fears Durham then I’m inclined to like him.
I tend to agree, so far as Durham’s intentions. I see him pursuing what he thinks is possible. Going after conspirators outside of government does indeed protect the insiders, but I can’t say whether that is the fundamental purpose, or a tactical move for the Sussman case. Durham has to thread carefully lest he be shut down, which leaves us with nothing, ever.
At this juncture, the Biden handlers are happy to let Durham discredit Hillary to prevent her from being resuscitated to draw off campaign contributions they want for 2024. The Sussman case is a venue for demonstrating that how Hillary and the DNC created the Russian Collusion hoax. IF Durham is bobbing and weaving tactically rather than covering up, the next stage involves prosecuting more players — and using them against each other — until the onion is slowly pealed. I’m going to choose the optimistic view that there will be few more wins for the Truth, without expectation for the thorough cleanup that s needed.
agree. It is strange though that FJB has not tried to remove Durham. This “administration” has shown repeatedly that they don’t care what you/we think or know…. makes no difference to them.
As to Durham’s possible strategy, it’s the difference between Sussman walking into court wearing a t-shirt that says “I did not kill myself”
…or Durham wearing the shirt.
Thus the sickness spreads to consume the body politic
And we will see, alas
The fall of the great Republic
If Durham cover ups the crimes inside the institutions, it just means the last path that nobody really wants to follow will be set. I hope Durham chooses to do the right thing.
THe narrative, the CIA “trying to save us” and the FBI” was duped” could not possibly exist at the same time.
We already know they were talking to each other all along.
Yes. One Peter Strzok was the liaison between the two. How could he and thus the FBI not know whatever the CIA knew. CIA is just better at CYA.
The part of the headline about the CIA trying to save the country doesn’t make any sense. Nothing in the substack article says that, it just says that the CIA didn’t think the “dirt” on Trump was legit.
You new here?
The search function is your friend. All of this has been discussed in painstakingly granular detail. Nothing in the Durham filings is new to this website… Now, we are looking at the bigger picture of what are they going to do about it?
The presentation by Durham is that the CIA identified the Clinton evidence as fraudulent. Everyone on this site new the evidence was fraudulent 4 years ago. The motive of Durham doing something about it, is what matters now. Not the actual crimes which we are all painfully aware of.
Groundhog Day
I agree. That is what keeps me scratching my head. To make us stupid sheeple think we still have a justice system that works? LMAO. I think that went out the window in 2020. There ain’t no salvaging that unless we see the election cheating prosecuted. And that will happen when, say, Hell freezes over.
That’s been true since his indictment last year. It said, paraphrasing, “the FBI wouldn’t have pursued Alfa Bank or the Russia hoax had Sussman told them he worked for Clinton.”
It was a lie then. It is a lie now. The Government has successfully erected a firewall around the corrupt government employees.
Everybody in the FBI that Sussman dealt with in 2016 knew that Sussman worked for Hillary Clinton!
That Hillary and her campaign duped the FBI is literally unbelievable.
Hoda thunk it? Right?
Part of me says I don’t care about the rest of these jerk offs I just want Hillary to get her comeuppance!
Durham can say that (they were duped) but NO ONE is going to buy it. Its foolish and ridiculous on its face. Their job is to vet these types of claims and this one was as blood simple as it gets. There is only one way this went forward and everyone knows what it is.
It’s completely laughable. They insult our intelligence on a daily basis.
I’m at the first stage of grief, denial
F the US Government that would file BS like this on Good Friday. If the FBI and CIA are that stupid, they need to be cashiered.
USA gave it a good try, but ultimately just like every other country ever, has fallen to a corrupt tyrannical government and its corrupt agencies it backs.
If Durham covers up the crimes within the US Intel Agencies by the inartful claim they are stupid, then the final act in the separation of the US red and blue voters has been done. We will ALL MOVE.
If this occurs, the US government will become the enemey of most of its citizens and taxpayers who will move to one of the 28 states that the SCOTUS said had NO STANDING in the ELECTORAL crisis of 2020.
If Durham covers up the institutional crimes of the intel agencies on behalf of elected and unelected power brokers it is Game over for the Republic.
Al Gore had standing to sue Florida in 2000 according to the Supreme Court! Why is that?
He was a democrat.
This political shift is already in progress, myself included. I consider it a tactical retreat. Red states are getting redder and pizzed off citizens like me are getting more involved. If I can’t participate directly I do it financially. Support those who support our values. It’s a small price to pay. Just think if all of us donated only $5 a month to those who stand for what we believe in.
Pretty much sums it up. Agency 2 is impressive in its technical abilities it seems after the fact. This is the same agency from which 50 former and current members testified to the false fact that the Hunter Biden laptop story was Russian misinformation. What was the head of Agency 2 saying during early 2017?
The intelligence apparatus’ open and overt disdain for President Trump then and now should serve as a clarion call for John Durham. It is a call that screams out for the complete truth.
The one thing that keeps me a “believer” as it were, of Special Counsel John Durham, is that I detect a strong dislike of the preppy Protestant aristocrats, like Robert Mueller, who have made it their life’s work to undo the 2016 election of Donald Trump, by fair means or foul. Durham’s being from Connecticut, but NOT with any Yale University connections, makes me think he hates all those snooty Ivy Leaguers with a cold passion.
Stick a fork in the USA. She is done..
It ain’t over until the fat lady sings, and she isn’t singing yet. With all the 24/7 doom and gloom some would think the world is over. There is power in positive thinking. People are waking up. That’s what happens when you hit them hard in the wallet. Fk them. I will never give up. These greedy arrogant assholes have gone too far. I want to see some people brought into citizen courtrooms in cages like Putin did to the assholes who plundered that country. America has immense wealth and most of it is plundered by a few sick homicidal maniacs with god complexes that will never be satisfied no matter how many billions or trillions they have and get their jollies poisoning us and want to bar code us like livestock. They are so greedy they want to take what little we own. It comes down to either us or them unfortunately.
not while I am alive. And when I die, I will be content knowing there are many remaining who share my believe that the United States of America is, and will continue to be, greater than the sum of it’s parts.
NSA is a White Hat.
Seriously? LOL.
I have said all along Durham, appointed by the swamp(Barr) had one job, ‘cover for the swamp’.
Trumps greatest achievement was to show everyone how stunningly corrupt DC is.
Then why did Barr and Durham publicly contradict IG Horowitz re: proper predication for Crossfire Hurricane? That can ONLY implicate FBI players
And wow, did he ever show us. They are all ten times worse than we ever imagined.
Wake me up when someone actually is convicted and given a shit load of jail time
I hope you have a comfortable bed!
Of course the deep state insiders will get away with it, so far. The thing that’s interesting is in order for the institutions to skate free, Clinton campaign AND the DNC would have to take the blame. So how do the democrats expect to win in 2024 when they are the sacrificial lambs at the deep state alter? Wouldn’t that make it easier for a Trump win? Isn’t a Trump win the last thing they want?
Every single senior member of Hillary’s campaign and associations was in on it. Which includes but not limited to: Hillary, Bill and Chelsea Clinton, John Podesta, Huma Abedin, Robby Mook, Jennifer Palmieri, Brian Fallon. Also, Lanny Davis, lawyers at Perkins Coie, & Donna Brazile. Every single one of them knew it was a lie and either perpetuated the lie, or lied via omission. The whole lot of them should be hung.
The FBI is totally corrupt, top to bottom. The whole damn Bureau is repugnant. Durham is letting the bastards off the hook!
Of course!
White hats playing 45,763-d chess. Hope porn.
Hans Mahncke
@HansMahncke
Why Durham hasn’t charged anyone with conspiracy? Perhaps he needs more evidence. Last night we learned that 2 people have flipped, an IT guy and a Fusion staffer. That’s big but both are too low on the food chain to know about the extent of involvement of top Clinton officials.
3:12 PM · Apr 16, 2022
I, for one, do not share Sundance’s pessimism. Let’s not forget about Danschenko. While all of the public disclosures thus far concern the Alfa Bank/Sussmann angle, Danschenko is the key to Clinton Dossier/Steele/Ohr/FBI shenanigans.
I won’t lose hope until Danschenko filings begin, if they seem to point to same approach.
Will anyone ask/pursue why the CIA stayed silent on their findings and (apparently?) made no effort to clue the FBI in on Sussmann, et al’s deceptions?
Have to also wonder what did Pompeo know and when did he know it and what did he do about it?
Related:
Pompeo as head of CIA and state did nothing to dismantle the swamps there.
THIS IS WHAT I’M TALKING ABOUT?
Mccabe’s Porsche on Blocks
@Larry_Beech
Unsubstantiated Durham prediction:
Someone signs a dealio this coming week. After Monday’s motion to compel oppositions arrive someone’s gonna decide it’s their last chance to be
the first 🐀 to get the 🧀.
One could see years ago there would be a final blow struck to the Clintons to allow Obama supremacy over the Democratic Party.
Didn’t know when or how but it looks like this may be it.
An attorney representing Clinton making knowingly false allegations to FBI/CIA about a political opponent.
And then thru his Presidency too. If known to Clinton campaign, this damns the Clintons forever and puts Obama atop all Democrat.
Interestingly, the facts were known to be unproven and the Obama FBI did not follow its process and lied to FISA Court along the way. But this will be ignored?
When the CW2 kicks off he will be in grave danger where ever he goes .
Barr, a known curator of evidence appoints Durham to get to the bottom of anything? Unfortunately it is one curator to another. As long as Durham is in place no one else can legally process information. See what they did there? Curator Durham could stay in place through the next Republican administration to place hold evidence.
Sussman is the one that is going to take the fall . Then it will be : move along , nothing to see here .
The FBI was not “duped” by any stretch of the imagination. They willingly participated in manufacturing evidence and knowingly presented that evidence to a judge to obtain a warrant.
Remember who is really in charge right now. It’s the deepstate. Garland is the DOJ. I still have faith and believe in Justice. I think Durham has to tread through the swamp bit by bit and not reveal too much to let on to the swamp where he is going and yet, stay on track. There may even be a little disinformation going on so as to not give off his intentions. Like peeling the onion slowly. If you look around, many prominent swamp dwellers, mostly democrats are in trouble right now. So, if they had total power, I don’t think this would be going on. There is some justice still out there…and I will remain hopeful that it comes to pass here. In the end, it may be the big picture of all of this together, Russia hoax all the way through to the election steal that brings them down. And we might have to use military that has not been COMPRIMISED. Otherwise…I hate to think we would regress to the mid 1800’s!
If handled correctly, the FISA abuse track should address the violations and potential crimes on the government side. The current path the SC is pursuing is dealing with the origins of the spying operation on President Trump.
simple fact reminder:
the USG and Courts at one time held that due process and habias corpus could be suspended and even trampled with dealing with foreign non-citizens. There is nothing controversial about this legal interpretation. It is manifestly proper that non-US citizen hold no constitutional power for protections.
And so, at ONE TIME, ONLY US CITIZENS were protected against ANY non-constitutional force by USG.
This has changed.
How it started is plainly to link. It was the expansion of legal interpretations and exploiting gaps and holes in DOJ prosecutorial and investigative powers under the patriot act.
In a very rapid sequence of events, the constitutional protections afforded to US Citizens then became subject to the same exact secret police spy state OBJECTIVE.
The DOJ ALONG WITH THE COURTS effectively zeroed OUT the constitutional protections and limits of unlawful search, seizure and other surveillance, both passive and of the weaponized type.
This has left the US citizens in a position that carries no distinctions than NON-US citizen Foreign People.
tldr: The USG had ended it’s constitutional contract with America. YOU ARE THE ENEMY. “YOUR” gov’t operates without any limits and bounds. None. The USG will continue to erode Citizens protections and weaponize the Intelligence and Secret Police Spy State. It holds these NEW POWERS UNLAWFULLY in both possession and in conduct. USG is conducting a WAR AGAINST YOU.
these matters were predicted long ago. Those that were cognizant and most vocal about the threats to US soverignty principles and human rights, and natural rights, and the controls that delimit overly broad and excessive central state power and reach are either dead or have been silenced by the corruptors.
They warned about this very situation when the patriot act was designed in its first iteration.
WHY?
because within the text of the patriot act is located a specific set of new and quite vague interpretations of what composes a non-uniformed, stateless, combatant. The so called “enemy of the state” would be targeted with these new surveillance and extra-judicial powers to suspend due process and habeas corpus. However, with a thinly defined legal determination of what a enemy of the state actually is, all manner of interpretations have been smashed into the scope of these new powers.
First it was: US citizens acting on behalf of foreign terror operators.
Then it was: rogue US citizens who are suspect of adverse foreign influence.
Then it was: US citizens espousing anti-war, anti-US sentiments
Then it was: US Citizens daring to question US foreign Policy and mocking it
Then it was: US Citizens that dared to record and process and list and analyze and publish their opinions of the agenda and actions of the USG so that other may get more information about the authenticity of USG
Then it was: US citizens who expressed their own opinions and comments about the USG priorities.
Then it was: US Citizens who acted and then voted for electorates who are not aligned with the corrupt central state, threatening the position that holds greatest power over the core USG secret police spy apparatus.
Then it was: US citizens who mocked the administration for its failures and gross imcompetence.
Then it was: US Citizens who questioned the so-called pandemic science and gene therapy.
Then it was: US Citizen workers who rejected the jab on the grounds that it would a decision that must happen individually and not by force or mandate or implicit threats and other vile “inticements”
then it was: US citizen who rally power and attempt to influence the social media giants, up to and including new ownership and reform agendas toward the world’s biggest digitial townhall (twitter))
then it was: US citizens who protested against the state to indoctrinate their children in schools with ideas that are not just factually wrong but are dangerous, offensive and cause learning and critical skills fundamentals to be ignored.
then it was: US citizens being arrested, persecuted, and even murdered simply for the act of civil disobedience toward a corrupt central state. Often, uncharges, detained, and even dissappeared.
all of these things were predicted long ago.
What we are seeing right now is a clear link between how the USG has set aside the constitution, namely the laws and intent of the constitution that the USG be restrained completely from acquiring such power and using it as a weapon against the US people.
If we are to gain our freedoms, delimit lawlessness from our USG and restore a functioning constitutionl law abiding nation,
IT MUST HAPPEN THAT THE PATRIOT ACT AND ALL OF THE SURVEILLANCE STATE/SECRET POLICE POWERS BE VACATED, COMPLETELY AND ENTIRELY.
That’s the most important aspect of how THE PEOPLE have any chance of getting their freedoms back and also restoring a USG that defends US people, not attacks them.
God Bless America
Great rant. Amazing how the 2,000 page disgustingly named “Patriot Act” was presented 5 minutes after they (USG) took down the Twin Towers. You just can’t make this stuff up,
LOL, Sundance your wit is razor sharp in this piece. That last paragraph has me rolling on the floor.
I have sympathy for Sussmann’s argument that his representation (that he was not working for the Clinton campaign) was not material. It wasn’t. We know it wasn’t. We know that the DOJ/FBI was already doing and was going to continue doing what it did regardless of what Sussmann told them. His nonsense was just the pretext, just the excuse, that the DOJ/FBI decided used to justify their course of action. I imagine Sussmann feels like he is being set up as the fall guy. Poor sod, but as a Clinton insider he knows better than to sqwalk about it. He’ll take his 14 days in jail and 1 year suspension of his law license like a man.
I don’t think sussman really had any chance of being anything other than a patsy…that I agree.
but I will note that there is some good informed people reporting that Baker may have pleaded his case and presented evidence and testimony in exchange for his own freedom from this legal investigation. Some have opined that baker is a safe bet that is “playing ball” with Durham or may have set some special deals to DOJ AG directly.
My view: I think that Baker is involved and probably has cooperated with Durham. However, in such pleas in exchange for a get out of jail card, Baker would be in a very powerful position of “leverage”. It may be that Durham might be able to use Baker witness evidence in the trial against sussman, but I think the DOJ blocks Durham to put him on the stand or even using anything but a few short curated pages of baker testimony to support the sussman case. That would be how someone like baker can only be seen as the spike in this case. The anchor so to speak. He agrees to ‘testify” in exchange for no charges. But then only agrees to some evidence, but just only that testimony that marginally backs the truth of the entire cabal. Putting Baker on the stand as a witness, allowing all uncurated evidence (writing, email, text, telegram, telegraph, encrypted and courier and COMPLETE bank records would not be something I think this DOJ AG will allow. Even IF Durham was going to be successful, it would be limited. It would be limited because the DOJ AG would never allow a single court case to open up the entire coup. Baker probably didn’t even have to ask for this plead. It was likely crafted for him in advance and post Durham Subpoena in the evidence gathering phase. It would be expected the Baker would have accepted the offer from the DOJ and sign in legal contract a mutually beneficial delimited testimony. Now we have Durham in trial, relying heavily on the Sussman-Baker relationship, and not having a key witness to take the stand (Baker). And this means the entire cruxt of the Durham line of prosecutorial focus is eroded fundamentally because they will be presented allegations of deception (INTENT) based only on selective curated Baker material…presumably in text format. This makes is very difficult for a Jury because they cannot see the witness on the stand. And the text can be interpretated in a way that would be very different than a witness under cross examination about the same text. So this places the jury facing a prediction they will suspicious of the prosecutor (Durham) to not being capable of producing a witness in the trial. The curation of the text will also be such to add even more doubts about INTENT. There will be misrepresentations in the courtroom by both prosecutor and also defendant (sussman). Ultimately the Court Judge makes a determination that the Evidence (currated text of Baker), is to be withdrawn from this case and that the jury instructed to ignore it.
And at that very moment, IT ENDS.
Sussman is found not guilty.
Baker, by his prior plead deal with DOJ, never has to sit as a witness, and he gets a forever get out of jail card. Never to be tried again on any other aspect of the entire coup. AND his curated and uncurated text with sussman and other material facts are now legally insulated…placed in classification….as they already likely are…and then buried under 5 million pounds of salt. Never to be seen or used again IN ANY OTHER TRIAL
Spoiler: The Durham “team” gave up its first true litmus results.
it only has 9 (or is it 11) prosecutors.
There was never a spot in reality where 9-11 prosecutors are ever going to be able to do the actual work required to actually perform anything beyond one maybe up to 3 shots at indictments. It’s a logistical fact. If you want BIG CASES OF CONSPIRACY adjucated, would have required a minimum of 100 prosecutors in total…for all the sorts of things that would be required to do and stay out in front and have a winning chance: the legal, the political, the resources, the ability to meet with a consult with court judges and make petitions, to have unfettered access to even the most classified documents surrounding the CONSPIRACY that took place over several years!
I made this remarks very early when Durham was announced. I had my hopes dashed when I realized it just did not have enough power to accomplish true justice.
That’s about the moment when I changed my views about the outcomes from Durham. It’s just not believable that such a small crew is going to have both the small team synergy and expertise AND TIME, to do all of the investigating they must do and get witnesses, and testimonies and documents…all working together in concert. That doesn’t happen with 9 people…Ever. 9 attorneys will be able to handle a small sized insurance business conspiracy and or fraud, or defend a company from lets say a 100 Million Dollar Fraud case. This 9 person team would still have to prove EACH AND EVERY SINGLE conspirators operating with AN INTENT that is provable to a jury.
9 people can’t do that. Ever. It would be like asking 3 people to handle the entire school bus transportation and kids to school monday through friday. 3 people, at best will only be able to carry maybe 24 loads a day. So if your school system is 9000 kids. Then the 3 only get 720 kids to school. It’s a logistics issue. Simple math shows that 3 people can not get the job done.
it is exactly the same thing here with Durham.
They have given him the responsibility, the authority, the resources, the scope, and the investigative and prosecutorial power to solve the HIGHEST CRIME EVER COMMITTED IN US HISTORY.
and he assembles 9 people.
nine.
So when I put my spin on things and I give my opinion about how this case is likely to proceed, it from that lens.
the math didn’t add up…it never did…it never could reconcile itself. it was a lion of a truth in plain daylight…sittting there…not even concerned it could be seen….flaunted even…not protected in any sense that a real special prosecutor might not necessarily want to be revealed…no opacity there. Not unusual, but the short number was the serious permanent defect.
Durham has not grown his team of 9 beyond that number…has never requested more funds, resources, outside contractor, nothing.
nope just 9.
not after PRESUMABLY gathering the mother of all evidence that show the scale and scope of the CONSPIRACY.
nope…just 9…even after the discovery.
Sussman is sitting pretty. He will plead early in the trial, if it ever even gets there: Motion to dimiss. (not mistrial)
and the judge will ultimately agree. A lack of evidence that jumps over the INTENT requirement.
Sussman goes home. Durham and his 9 knaves go pack up and roll up the very small tent and have that last dinner together not making eye contact….with more than a few eyes darting the room looking for fast movement.
Baker stays home where he always was going the be found during the “trial”.
and the most fundamental documents about the CRIME IN ALL OF US HISTORY will be disappeared, never to be seen by any person, never to be called again by any court, never to be used for any legal purpose, ever again. blackholed.
Some court cases are interesting. some reveal the truth.
I suppose we will see some kind of a trial, but it will predicably end with Sussman walking outside and making a brief news engagement to celebrate his proven innocense.
the radical news will report it as some old trump era durham bogey man…probably a white supremacist wash up who got ahead of his skies.
the radical news will report it as ANOTHER EXAMPLE of fringe maga conspiracy theorist having lost all of reality.
that is predictable.
What is uncertain?
Will those that coordinated a coup ever be held to justice?
You’re forgetting one important thing. Durham is tasked with trump Russia “origins”.
Why was this whole thing ever started? To hide the fact of the real DNC email source….Seth Rich.
This was the true origin story. A Cover-up for a murder authorized by the Government
What I wonder is what happened to the information that Sundance provided to the lead investigator? Has it been buried as well? There ARE investigators and people inside the Durham investigation who know the truth thanks to our fearless CTH leader and community.
They know that we know. How can they expect that it won’t surface and hand them egg on their faces?
Oh, and I almost forgot. Will they keep Julian Assange locked up forever? Will they suicide him? What will they do about the evidence that he is holding?