Devin Nunes Discusses The Testimony of Rod Rosenstein – Sketchy Statements Conflict With Evidence…

Devin Nunes appears on One America News for an interview about last weeks testimony by former Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.  As Nunes notes, Rosenstein is a very “slippery individual” who is professionally versed in obtuse language.

“There is a fine line between disingenuous and lying.”  WATCH:

It is now clear Senator Lindsey Graham is executing the familiar chaff and countermeasure approach to cover-up the former administration surveillance abuses.

Here are four specific reasons that clarity is assured. Ranked in order of brutality:

♦ Number Four:

While there was some cursory inquiry into the reasoning of Rod Rosenstein to authorize the direct targeting of Trump campaign officials, not a single Senator inquired about the specifics behind how the August 2, 2017, scope memo was created:

Who specifically identified the targets; what justification was provided by the special counsel to target the officials; why were those specific persons selected; and under what predicate was Rosenstein authorized to expand the Mueller investigation?

The Senators on the Judiciary Committee, with full knowledge and forethought; and with specific access to the document in question; and with malicious intent to deny justice on behalf of those targeted; totally failed to make appropriate inquiry.

♦ Number Three:

To make matters worse… The Senate Judicary Committee members specifically stated they were aware of the content of the Mueller Report. As a witness, DAG Rosenstein brought a copy of the Mueller report with him to the hearing; and yet not a single member of the committee highlighted the hidden/secret October 20, 2017, scope memo.

There was ZERO inquiry from the Senate Judiciary Committee into a known issue that was/is relevant to the ongoing prosecution of General Michael Flynn; and the underlying evidence, first uncovered within the report; highlighting how Rod Rosenstein authorized a hidden memorandum to target Michael Flynn Jr. as leverage to force a guilty plea from the original target that Rosenstein authorized. This was completely ignored:

The Senate Judiciary Committee’s lack of inquiry was either because they held no awareness of the hidden scope memo; or, more likely, because they needed to pretend they held no awareness of the hidden October 20th scope memo to avoid exposing it.

♦ Number Two:

Despite the former Deputy AG stating twice that he was troubled by the leaking of the highly classified FISA application to the media, the committee intentionally and purposefully avoided asking the obvious question:

If DAG Rod Rosenstein was so concerned about the leak of the Carter Page FISA, then why did the DOJ under Rosenstein’s tenure purposefully refuse to indict SSCI Security Director James Wolfe for leaking the FISA application?

During his testimony Deputy AG Rosenstein testified this specific leak was alarming to him because it identified the innocent target of the investigation, Carter Page. However, Rosenstein was NOT alarmed enough to prosecute Wolfe for the leak. Why Not?

The Senate Judiciary Committee never went near that highly explosive issue.

However, if the purpose and intent of Senator Graham were not crystal clear by those three prior issues that were left undiscussed, the number one proof of his intention is stunning in its brutality.

♦ Number One:

The Senate Judiciary Committee was recently made aware of a letter from the DOJ to the FISA Court written in July of 2018. The letter was/is a specific example of fraud upon the court during the tenure of Rod Rosenstein. It is inexcusable that Rod Rosenstein was not asked about the July 12, 2018, material lie to the court.

Please notice this DOJ cover letter (making the committee aware) was personally sent to Chairman Lindsey Graham by the DOJ as ORDERED by the FISA Court.

The content of the communication was a 2018 letter from the DOJ to the FISA Court. The letter below was sent by the DOJ National Security Division on July 12, 2018.

The purpose of the hearing today was specifically about the FISA abuses, yet the committee did not ask a single question about this letter. Here it is:

This is an incredibly misleading letter to the FISA court because what the letter doesn’t say is that 18-months earlier the sub-source, also known in the IG report as the “primary sub-source”, informed the FBI that the material attributed to him in the dossier was essentially junk.

By July 2018 the DOJ clearly knew the dossier was full of fabrications, yet they withheld that information from the court and said the predicate was still valid. Why?

How is it even remotely possible for Senator Lindsey Graham to conduct an inquiry into Crossfire Hurricane and FISA abuses, and yet completely avoid asking Rod Rosenstein about the content of a letter that was specifically created during his tenure; and goes directly to the heart of his personal involvement.

The content itself is a complete fabrication of information and it was written by Rosenstein’s DOJ a full fifteen months after the DOJ was fully aware the predicate for the FISA application was fraudulent.

This 2018 justification letter was so alarming the FISA Court itself demanded the DOJ send a copy of it to the Senate Judiciary Committee to use in oversight. However, Chairman Graham didn’t ask Rod Rosenstein a single question about it.

There is no way to look at the absence of inquiry without accepting the motive and intent of the committee is to bury information; thereby protecting DC entities.

The hearing was intentionally scheduled to give the appearance of Senator Graham taking action; he isn’t. It’s the all-too-familiar…

.….Chaff and countermeasures!

This entry was posted in 4th Amendment, 6th Amendment, AG Bill Barr, Big Government, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, Election 2020, FBI, IG Report Comey, IG Report FISA Abuse, IG Report McCabe, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Spygate, THE BIG UGLY, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

70 Responses to Devin Nunes Discusses The Testimony of Rod Rosenstein – Sketchy Statements Conflict With Evidence…

  1. And Rosenstein was never asked about wearing a wire…..or asked about what legal justification for appointing Mueller……Commonsense questions…..Incredible……

    Liked by 13 people

  2. Chaff & Countermeasures = Steer Feces

    Liked by 5 people

    • The Demon Slick says:

      It’s so frustrating. Watching Lindsey Graham pretending, watching everyone else pretending along. Makes me wanna holler

      Liked by 1 person

      • MVW says:

        1. Accident
        2. Coincident
        3. Enemy Action
        We are well past 3.

        Look, these are crafty, very smart people, who have smart crafty people working for them. No. They are crooks, covering for their fellow crooks in $ multi trillion scams. Our enemies know this and are buying what they need from this syndicate for pennies.

        These crooks will sell your liver.

        The fact that this election is getting so hot is good news, it smells like desperation. Not sure why though as they seem to have corrupted all layers and branches of Gruberment.

        Liked by 1 person

  3. everywhereguyy says:

    Weasel gotta weasel. They all see that prison is now on the radar. Time to save yourself and leave others in the crosshairs.

    They would never have tried this whole amazing thing from mid-2016 on if they hadn’t been “sure” HRC would win. Super Geniuses.

    Liked by 4 people

    • ezpz2 says:

      Prison? Who’s going to prison?

      There have been numerous criminal referrals and what has DOJ done? DECLINED to prosecute. That’s what.

      Lisa Page has just joined her good friend Herr Weismann at Mess-nbc as some kind of *expert* in something. 🙄

      It’s in our face hubris. I really find it hard to understand how some still think we will see real justice.

      Liked by 2 people

    • G. Alistar says:

      In the Army, US Forces Korea….we had a name for guys who had trouble telling the truth. Like RR, we called them “slicky mandoo” — often they became just plain slick. Seems appropriate for RR, a government bureaucrat who walks the fine line between being disingenuous and lying. He is a creature of the swamp…smart, rich, powerful, connected, lawyered up and slick. Yep, a weasel!

      Like

  4. thedoc00 says:

    There needs to be a “Number 4A”:
    Who directed the “Secrete New Scope Orders” issued to Mueller and under what rationale??
    What were the secrete verbal orders and where they written into a formal document?? (ref: Mueller’s rebuttal brief during the Manafort Trial, stating verbal orders were issued).

    To borrow leaf from Ted Cruz’s concern about abuse of power, the evidence also did not support the scope changes. So, even Ted should have caught this one!

    Liked by 3 people

  5. jeans2nd says:

    Andrew McCarthy has studied the Rosenstein testimony intensely and determined the technical legal term for Rosenstein – Weasel.
    Andrew McCarthy to Derek Hunter on the Daily Daily Caller podcast Friday 5 June 2010.

    Liked by 5 people

  6. fangdog says:

    For several years it has been explained in great detail all the wrong-doing by the wrong-doers and who the “wrong-doers”. Each week it is all pretty much repeated again with the how much and the who. However, what actually gets done about it?

    Unless I am missing something; not much if any. It seems like a long, long time ago I heard my first “Tick-Tock”. I remember way back when thinking, “Well they got Hillary and the Clinton crime family now”. If there is an example of “Crime Pays” there would be no better proof than referencing the Clinton’s way back to Arkansas.

    Liked by 3 people

  7. MitchRyderDetroitWheels says:

    Truth is those useless and pathetic senators DON”t WANT to know the truth in addition none of them (maybe a few) have the intellect to get to the truth. I despise Lindsey Graham. When I see his face I want to slap the shit out him. He was put in place by the ever corrupt Mitch to stop/cutback on as much info as possible. The good news is the senate is going to convict anybody anyway. If Barr and his bunch doesn’t have the goods then anything that happens in the senate is a waste of time. You couldn’t find enough honest people in the senate to have a doubles tennis match.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Sharpshorts says:

    There are professional hypocrites and there are Rosensteins…
    “Step right up, everyone’s a winner, step right up, only a dollar step right up”

    Liked by 3 people

  9. libertydemandsmemory says:

    Thank you for shining the Light of Truth, Devin, Sundance, and Treepers,

    covidementia has swept across our nation.

    Our concerns about the evil-ites of the
    “Thief State” and dimming Liberty are valid and demand immediate attention.

    We depend upon elected and appointed officials to protect and defend us and our Constitution, but they increasingly betray us.

    they dishonor our trust and willfully serve God-less thieves who are hell-bent on destroying our Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness.

    Why do we foolishly expect CONgress and 3-letters to save us ?

    CONgress and 3-letters ARE the problem because they continue to protect the Criminal Institutions of America.

    they protect and cover-up for their fellow criminals.

    the phoney “sources and methods”
    excuse for making redactions is easily translated –

    sources = liars

    methods = crimes

    CONgress and 3-letters intentionally create problems then extort more and more tax money from us to “solve” the problems they just forced upon us.

    Let us stop expecting our abusers to help us.

    Let us re-direct our “cold anger” onto the PROTECTORS of “Thief State” criminals.

    “Thief State” evil-ites are glad-handing, forked-tongued, suffer-mongering, mass-murdering psychopaths who gleefully grab blood-money they steal while hurting us.

    Let us say, “No!!”, to CONgress – “No!!” to 3-letters – and “No!!” to local “officials” who betray us.

    covidementia has swept across our country.

    corrupt politicians are especially susceptible to the delusions of covidementia.

    they are classified as a high-risk, low-info, useless-cheater group of tyrants.

    Whom should we blame for the rampant, virulent covidementia that rapidly, magically swept across our nation with pre-meditated plans to steal jobs, cripple our economy, starve our citizens, and force innocent people into fear and house arrest ?

    “Thief State” evil-ites and their protectors.

    When we name the protectors,
    we name the traitors…

    bondobarr, et Al

    Liberty demands memory

    7:32pm

    Liked by 4 people

  10. libertydemandsmemory says:

    Thank you for shining the Light of Truth, Devin, Sundance, and Treepers,

    covidementia has swept across our nation.

    Our concerns about the evil-ites of the
    “Thief State” and dimming Liberty are valid and demand immediate attention.

    We depend upon elected and appointed officials to protect and defend us and our Constitution, but they increasingly betray us.

    they dishonor our trust and willfully serve God-less thieves who are hell-bent on destroying our Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness.

    Why do we foolishly expect CONgress and 3-letters to save us ?

    CONgress and 3-letters ARE the problem because they continue to protect the Criminal Institutions of America.

    they protect and cover-up for their fellow criminals.

    the phoney “sources and methods”
    excuse for making redactions is easily translated –

    sources = liars

    methods = crimes

    CONgress and 3-letters intentionally create problems then extort more and more tax money from us to “solve” the problems they just forced upon us.

    Let us stop expecting our abusers to help us.

    Let us re-direct our “cold anger” onto the PROTECTORS of “Thief State” criminals.

    “Thief State” evil-ites are glad-handing, forked-tongued, suffer-mongering, mass-murdering psychopaths who gleefully grab blood-money they steal while hurting us.

    Let us say, “No!!”, to CONgress – “No!!” to 3-letters – and “No!!” to local “officials” who betray us.

    covidementia has swept across our country.

    corrupt politicians are especially susceptible to the delusions of covidementia.

    they are classified as a high-risk, low-info, useless-cheater group of tyrants.

    Whom should we blame for the rampant, virulent covidementia that rapidly, magically swept across our nation with pre-meditated plans to steal jobs, cripple our economy, starve our citizens, and force innocent people into fear and house arrest ?

    “Thief State” evil-ites and their protectors.

    When we name the protectors,
    we name the traitors…

    bondobarr, et Al

    Liberty demands memory

    7:32pm

    Like

  11. warrenjay13 says:

    How did the system become so corrupt? How can it be fixed?

    Like

  12. warrenjay13 says:

    How did the system become so corrupt? How can it be fixed?

    Like

  13. California Joe says:

    Seems like ancient history! The house is on fire and surrounded by the Zulu Army but the lawn hasn’t been watered in three weeks and looks pretty dry.

    Like

  14. Pa Hermit says:

    There is only 2 alternatives with our elected officials. They can either dazzle with brilliance or baffle with bullchit! We are NOT getting dazzled anymore! One needs to be a little more descriptive than chaff and countermeasures. Hope I don’t get 2 minutes in the sin bin for this, LOL!

    Like

  15. Please explain to me the difference is between “There is a fine line between disingenuous and lying.”. I am just an old country boy, but being disingenuous to me is lying. It is like saying there is a fine line between right and wrong, day and night, light and dark, goodness and evil, black and white. What am I missing?
    I even queried the definition of disingenuous through multiple sources. It sure sounds like lying to me, I do not see any fine line.

    Like

    • billrla says:

      Silent Entity: I’m with you. Of course it’s a lie. Disingenuous is a word people use with the media when the goal is obfuscation (in other words, not telling the truth).

      Liked by 1 person

      • MVW says:

        ‘Less than candid’, when that phrase is used you know the dice is loaded, the ballot box is stuffed, the fox is guarding the hen house, and Sessions was just asleep at the sentry post.
        Too many moving parts working together over decades = CIA
        Too many different departments, multiple agencies, all branches of Gruberment, international finance, 5-eyes, all the media over decades, maybe longer = old NGO.

        Time to kill the old spider.

        Like

    • regitiger says:

      the “argument” is manufactured to realize a greater benefit.

      the purpose of this type of argument proposes that it becomes a matter of subjective decision making.

      what is the definition of “is”..

      it presents the argument that it tantamount to this:

      no that color isn’t green..it a bit of blue and bit of yellow…you see…what shade of green is it? more blue than yellow, or more yellow than green.

      the problem of course, is the deception…that it contains both colors is really of no consequence in truth telling, the whole entire truth…that it contains just a bit of color that creates a shade of green, means that the effects are green…

      mom: did you steal that candy bar?
      kid: I took it, but I didn’t steal it.
      mom: did you pay for it?
      kid: I didn’t, but there was no one there to take my money and it didn’t have a price tag on it.
      mom: so, you did steal it!!! ?
      kid: I only took that one that didn’t have a price tag on it. I DID pay for these other things.
      mom: wait until your father gets home.

      it’s basically the same thing.

      we have a problem in our society about what the truth is..the basics of right and wrong are established NOT on doing the right thing and being honest about wrongdoing, but only about what you can get away with, and what you “explain”.

      that isn’t green, it’s almost blue.

      that isn’t being a liar, it’s just that the way I want to describe the color ..because that it what it means to me..that is what I WANT IT TO MEAN.

      lost…

      now, lets go back over the corrupt methods the FBI/DOJ used to destroy Flynn.

      we KNOW you didn’t lie..but we want to persecute you …so we will just say that you lied.

      it’s OUR WORD against you…and the entire court system is established to assume FIRST that OUR WORD is superior.

      FBI: we can make any color we want into green…blue and yellow need not apply.

      Liked by 2 people

  16. FreyFelipe says:

    In Rod Rosenstein’s Through the Looking Glass world, everything is lies. Nothing is the truth because everything is what it isn’t. And contrary wise, what is, it can’t be. And what it can’t be, it must be. You see? Is that clear enough?

    Liked by 1 person

  17. Mongo Mere Pawn says:

    And to date, no one has asked the most obvious question of all: Is there any evidence that Candidate, President-Elect or President Trump, or any of the members of his family, was the subject of electronic surveillance through the NSA database, whether targeted directly or derivatively through FISA or illegally by the FBI subcontractors as revealed by the Rogers audit? No one will answer this question, even though it goes to the heart of the matter.

    Like

    • Bogeyfree says:

      To your point, we can send people to the moon and back, we have the fastest computer in the world, we have missiles that go 16x speed of sound but we can get…….

      A simple summary report from 2009-2016 of all NSA searches conducted on whom, what was searched and who authorized these searches.

      Seems pretty easy and would have been a piece of cake IMO for “Hammering” Grenell but we sent him down to the minors.

      What good is that place in Utah if you can’t get a simple report.

      Sundance should call Don Jr. and meet him for a beer.

      Like

  18. Nola Gal says:

    Ok treepers. Long time lurker here. Love your work.

    Was he sworn in? Did any of you see it?

    I watched the Rosenstein feed from the Judicial Committee. I don’t remember Rosenstein being sworn in. Did you see it on your feed you were watching. I saw Graham talking at length then he goes and we have here Rod Rosenstein. Then Rosenstein goes into his statement. Maybe it was before the Committee feed began, I just did not see it so every time I read about Rod saying this or that I can’t stop thinking but was he under oath? If any of you could shed light I would be forever grateful.

    Like

    • regitiger says:

      yes…was sworn..

      to the larger point:

      care to know how many people were charged with perjury before congress in the last 25 years?

      or contempt?

      spoiler: you are NEVER GOING TO SEE JUSTICE BY ANY ACTION OF CONGRESS.

      Like

      • regitiger says:

        for AG Holder was “held” in contempt of congress.

        not criminal referrals to DOJ ever happened.

        if you want to make the biggest most significant deception and lie to hide a crime, just make sure you do that first before congress.

        you really have to understand how this works for the corruptors. congress has basically given them the framework to operate without penalty.

        even the most serious crimes in US history….the treasonous criminal conspiracy to coup a president….and to destroy the decorated combat military officer of exemplary record, just because he was a threat to exposing their former criminal violations and deceptions against the will of the US citizens.

        when you show up in congress, it’s basically your get out of jail card..get some heated moment, and then your ticket is punched.

        so it goes with elected “law makers and law breakers!”

        Like

      • Nola Gal says:

        Thanks for the reply….I can now at least stop having the internal monologue every time I read something about RR….lol.

        Like

  19. Lolasmom says:

    On the same day as Rs testimony, Lindsey went on Hannity to discuss and said something like…”see, it wasn’t Rosenstein’s fault, he didn’t do anything wrong.” What!!!!!!! I don’t understand how Lindsey thinks he can keep getting away with talking to us like we’re stupid. They’re all protecting Rosenstein for some reason. And Lindsey keeps doing this kind of thing over and over and rarely gets called out. It’s so frustrating and discouraging!

    Liked by 1 person

  20. islandpalmtrees says:

    Note: everything Sundance has said, I am in agreement with.

    But –
    How can this memorandum, for example be anything other than a lie? If the following is true.

    You see, according to existing data Carter Page worked for both the FBI & CIA for decades before the first FISA warrant was issued. Did the FBI & CIA not have a personnel Database. Did someone forget to tell Rod J. Rosenstein for years about Carter working not only for the FBI, but for the CIA. Did Peter Strzok forget to give this information to Comey or Brennan.

    It seems to me that we are being asked to suspend our common sense, that Rod J. Rosenstein and Muller did not know, who Carter Page was.

    Example only —
    MEMORANDUM
    FROM Rod J. Rosenstein Acting Attorney tic
    TO: Robert S. Mueller. III Special Counsel
    RE: The Scope of Investigation and Definition of Authority
    On May 17. 2017. I issued an order entitled “Appointment of Special Counsel to Investigate

    Like

  21. John Davis says:

    Prison?!!!
    Nah…

    Like

  22. libertydemandsmemory says:

    Rod Rodentstein, member of Thief State coup d’etat:

    1) Who are your ancestors from previous four generations?

    2) How have you helped the Fourth Reich infiltrate and gain power in the United States of America?

    3) What truths is your wife, Lisa Barsoomian, hiding when she delays/denies FOIA requests?

    8:18pm

    Liked by 1 person

  23. Perot Conservative says:

    The Body Language Ghost I posted yesterday said Rosenstein is full of non verbal tells.

    1. Repeated clenched fist – at the outside US attorney’s brought in by Bill Barr, not Obama attorneys.

    2. Placing his hand far away from his body, explaining there were a few people in the Department who held “personal political views” opposite of Lisa Page, Strzok, Comey, etc.

    3. Pointing in front of his body, essentially including himself, in people who were in alignment w Page & Strzok.

    Liked by 1 person

  24. It’s a Head Fake “Signifying Nothing”

    The Senate Intelligence Committee is a political entity. At this stage, there is nothing to be gained by forcing Rod Rosenstein, or any other witness, to disclose or acknowledge anything that goes to the heart of the matter. Those individuals they are calling to testify are all WITNESSES and or TARGETS in grand jury investigation that could/will lead to indictments. Lindsay Graham and the other Republicans on the committee aren’t going to learn anything of evidentiary value that AG Barr, Attorney John Durham’s team, and who knows who else who may be conducting investigations don’t already know. Why tip their hand?

    Ben Wittes and his 1000 former federal prosecutors and the spies they still control within the “Intelligence Community.” They would have loved nothing better than for Committee Republicans to disclose something/anything to which they could “react” via Enemedia to misinform (lie to) and mislead the public. For the court of public opinion is all they have left. Time historically has been on the Depravity Party’s side, but they’ve run out the string this time.

    Everything the demonic Congress and corrupt Judiciary have tried has failed. Hence the COVID-19 distraction, created to kill the economy, and the George Floyd riots, a last resort to instill fear and panic, and tar Pres Trump as a Tyrant. Once indictments are handed down, though, civil unrest is going to get really dicey.

    Remember, in his 2020 State of the Union Address, Pres Trump boldly declared that the United States of America would NEVER BECOME A SOCIALIST NATION. Many Americans in the Mushy Middle must have thought that he was a bit over-the-top to be making such a pronouncement. Why? How likely would that be? And who cares?

    Well, here we are. “Something like scales have fallen from their eyes*” and now they can see. And now they know.

    * Acts 9:18

    Liked by 1 person

  25. Mike in a Truck says:

    We all know where Lindsey will be Sunday morning..dont we?

    Like

  26. Jim in TN says:

    Generally, in political corruption like this, everybody is deemed innocent until somebody is convicted. Once somebody is convicted, then all associates are deemed as guilty. Often as unindicted co-conspirators.

    Perversely, the conviction doesn’t actually have to be for the political corruption. Like with Manafort, Stone, Popadapolous and Flynn. They are convicted or plead guilty to any piddling little thing, and somehow that proves all the lies about Trump. (Same was true about Scooter Libby and Bush.)

    The only way President Trump’s name will be cleared is to convict people for these abuses and false prosecutions.

    Sessions didn’t. Rosenstein participated in the abuses. Barr has passed up lots of opportunities. If Durham does anything, the trials can easily be delayed until after the election.

    I don’t even think that letting Flynn free will be enough to prove he was innocent and railroaded. People need to be prosecuted for what they did. Against Flynn and everybody they framed. They kept open investigations into crimes they had proved never happened. Then they convicted people for immaterial process crimes, mostly framed.

    They probably wouldn’t even have prosecuted Manafort if they weren’t out to get Trump.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Fools Gold says:

      I have the same feelings and thought as you, Jim. Tic Tock has always been the end game at this point…but 2020 just might change things a bit. Guess we’ll just have to see how it works out after the re-election of Donald J Trump! I pray it will MAGA II on much higher scale!

      Like

    • MVW says:

      What is at stake here in this battle?
      What is at stake is that **if** there is not massive criminal accounting of the top, it will be proof of concept. It will be proof that the USA is up for sale for pennies, and all our enemies will feast on the USA carcass after the sale. Already, China for sure will / is buying our reps and destroying those it can’t.

      Time is not on our side. Justice must be dealt. The fear of consequences must be made as clear as the noon day sun.

      Mr. Barr,
      Justice = Republic Survival

      Like

  27. melskia says:

    We can only hope Attorney John Durham will interview both R. Rosenstein and L. Graham and catch them with their sorry attempts to hide the truth.

    Like

  28. deplorable says:

    SD hits it exactly. Why did nobody ask Rosenstein this question:


    If DAG Rod Rosenstein was so concerned about the leak of the Carter Page FISA, then why did the DOJ under Rosenstein’s tenure purposefully refuse to indict SSCI Security Director James Wolfe for leaking the FISA application?

    Didn’t want to implicate any of their buddies in the Senate Club? from https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/02/11/the-dc-cover-up-thats-as-big-as-spygate/


    During his initial summer and fall negotiations with the DOJ, James Wolfe threatened to subpoena the SSCI in his defense. The implication was that Wolfe was directed to leak the FISA by members of the committee; and/or Wolfe was operating independently but under the assumption of alignment with SSCI members who were not adverse to Wolfe’s leak.

    So much for equal justice under the law.

    Like

    • Jan says:

      To add to your point, when Wolfe leaked the unredacted FISA warrant app to the media, why DID NO ONE PRINT THE UNREDACTED VERSION, like they did the Steele dossier?

      Like

  29. Terra Rayner says:

    I rewatched part of Yates and Clapper testimony from May of 2017….the 302 question is asked by Whitehouse to Yates if she had taken the 302 with her….she told him that she and some from the NSD got the 2 agents and went over their recollection of the questioning of Flynn!!!! They couldn’t wait for the 302 was her reasoning….what they did was manufactured the summary to take to McGahn…who the next day asked for the underlying evidence which Yates claimed she would have to return to DOJ and figure out how he could see it “logistically”!!! I think it was 3 days later she told him that he could come see it….THREE DAYS LATER? She was subsequently let go that evening for advising DOJ officials to ignore the EO travel ban! I missed that the first time i watched the testimony….the group from NSD creating the summary with the agents Strzok and Pientka!!!

    Liked by 1 person

  30. mtk says:

    As to number Four to number One, what can one say except, “The issues before the powers to be, are as enumerated as to be, “It it is not what can be proved, or mitagated to be in the MSM discourse, it is what the general public knows to be true!!!

    The corrupt influences are such that the truth in justice are commodities that are traded. And if they are trade, that means they have a market value that are settled in narratives at the highest levels of the MSM apperatus.

    Fooling none, except the most dullard of us, that by traded I mean the process of extracting value in terms of political outcomes.

    If PDJT is an existential affront to this establishment, he is THE absolutely embodiment of the anthem to the minipulative political process, if at only some truth level as to showing the truth and reality of the process.

    They hate him because at the heart of the matter he does not ascribe to what has been cooked up in NWO terms, and that he believes unquestioneedabily in the human certainty of all safe answers to unkowns are not a given.
    Nore that we should we be striving forward towards terms in terms of comfronts worked oit by elitists having struck a bargin that as a goal of their know goals is a world without us great unwashed.
    .
    Get the F out of our way, society will take care of the details as IT ALWAYS HAS.

    THE BIG SUM OF the PDJT PRESIDENCY is to have a revolution of thought that he so is hated and attacked is because he has not ascribed to the new world order plan even through he could. Trust me if he does then there is no hope for he is putting the eggs in their basket, that is holding an uncashable reasonableness check. For me it is a belief that he is railing against this NWO. Call me wrong, but PDJT needs to focus less on the petty, and become Presidental. Not in terms that meet MSM objectives( the goal post that will never extist to please them) But hat he should simply ignore the rabble in the MSM by pkaying their game in providing the PC answer to their wokeness,. Knowing that there there are multiple ways of speaking PC that exposes the shame.
    Basically imposing lanauge that exposes the shame and forces argumentation within left circles.

    Nor should it be about outcomes that dogde the swamping times of OUR days. It should be about knifing away the segment of the population that can not quite make sense of the LIES, yet are aware entertaining the lies that exist. And should not be made in our name.

    There is more down side to that NWO than I can speak in short bubble sentences.

    No greater truth exist, except when it comes to STATE lies, it not the greater lie, it is the LIE that exists in the first place. EVISCERATE that lie and all will fall in place.

    When it comes to State Lies, the first lie that forces a preconceived no turning back is the lie that should be trounced on. That is the lie tjat means something to them.
    If my take on millennials are correct, the greatest sin is to lie to them, let they are as a whole but willing to accept lies that fit an identity. Find that identity that forces a confrontation of lies and there whole world sense of order is turned upside down.

    In practise I should post a bank account to accept political credits for what I have written.

    Like

  31. Fools Gold says:

    My own opinion is Rod should have accidentally ejected himself from AF1 @30k when he had the chance.

    Like

  32. 123 456 says:

    Rod Rosenstein aka Joseph Goebbels

    Like

  33. Shellbell says:

    I wrote Senator Graham to ask the four specific reasons that Sundance outlines that show
    “It is now clear Senator Lindsey Graham is executing the familiar chaff and countermeasure approach to cover-up the former administration surveillance abuses.”
    Here is the response I got:
    Thank you for taking the time to contact me. I appreciate the opportunity to hear from you.

    Due to the large volume of mail I receive, I regret that I am only able to respond personally to inquiries from South Carolinians.

    As we continue our work in the 116th Congress, I look forward to supporting our troops in the War on Terror, repairing our economy and creating jobs, strengthening Social Security, lowering the tax burden on American families, and making the federal government more accountable and efficient.

    If your correspondence pertains to a scheduling request, please fax your request to (202) 224-3808.

    Sincerely,

    Lindsey Graham

    Follow Senator Lindsey Graham

    Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/USSenatorLindseyGraham

    Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/GrahamBlog

    Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/USSenLindseyGraham
    I would be interested in how he would respond to someone from South Carolina.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s