Interesting Segment – Trey Gowdy Discusses FBI Investigation and The Flynn-Kislyak Transcripts He Has Read…

On the topic of the FBI capture and use of the December 29, 2016, Flynn-Kislyak phone call…  First we had a hunch; then it became a suspicion… that evolved into a likelihood… that has now become a strong probability.

The capture of the December 29th phone call, which generated the raw “CR cuts“, was an FBI summary, modified for a specific interpretation.  Much like the missing 302 there is now a very strong probability the FBI ‘CR cuts’ do not represent the actual call content.

In this short interview segment Trey Gowdy alludes to one issue, and speaks directly to another.  First, the only reason the FBI opened the internal INSD review is because the information previously hidden has become public.  Second, the Flynn-Kislyak calls that Trey Gowdy has reviewed were “boring” nothing-burgers.  WATCH:

.

SELECTIVE CAPTURE – Did you note the part where the FBI told Gowdy some of the Flynn phone calls were “not captured”?  Wouldn’t it be a very convenient framework if the FBI was going to summarize one of those non-captured calls into a “CR cut.” 

FBI: “Oh, sorry, we don’t have the actual transcript, but we do have a summary of what we interpreted that call content to be.”  Huh, funny that.

Lastly, does anyone else find it odd that now is Trey Gowdy admitting that he viewed the Flynn-Kislyak phone call transcripts.  I wonder why he waited to say that….

This entry was posted in 4th Amendment, 6th Amendment, AG Bill Barr, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Decepticons, Deep State, Dept Of Justice, FBI, IG Report Comey, IG Report FISA Abuse, IG Report McCabe, Legislation, media bias, President Trump, propaganda, Russia, Spygate, Spying, THE BIG UGLY, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

365 Responses to Interesting Segment – Trey Gowdy Discusses FBI Investigation and The Flynn-Kislyak Transcripts He Has Read…

  1. Zephyrbreeze says:

    Remind me why all communications are not recorded by NSA? Is that because these National Security Committee devices are military encrypted?

    Like

  2. islandpalmtrees says:

    The big question is, what did Obama receive, on 1/5/17 at the White House. Was it the same version of the Flynn-Kislyak “CR cuts”/summary as the acting AG Yates provided to the Trump White House, in late January, regarding the Flynn-Kislyak conversation, that occurred on 12/29/16. If not, then why not?

    Did the FBI lie to both Presidents or just one?

    Sally Yates said she only learned about the Flynn-Kislyak phone call from President Obama himself after he’d dismissed everyone but her and James Comey from a January 5, 2017 White House meeting on Russian interference in the 2016 election.

    If Hannigan had turned this transcript over through official channels, it would have been subjected to mandatory minimization under U.S. law and, as such, could not have been the basis of the Yates intervention on Jan. 26. This eliminates the FBI, the Department of Justice and the NSA as viable conduits for any Flynn-related intelligence sourced to GCHQ. If, however, Hannigan provided the Flynn transcript to the CIA using back channels, then John Brennan, CIA director under Obama, emerges as the leading culprit behind the leak—breathing life into Nunes’ assertion that the Flynn leak could only have come from the “highest levels” of the Obama administration.

    http://www.truthdig.com/articles/trumps-wiretapping-charge-could-contain-some-explosive-truth-2/

    Did Brennan or one of his little minions, bring back transcriptions or Intercepts from GCHQ for Clapper or Obama?

    That 12/29/16 intercept generated proprietary FBI “CR cuts” or summaries of that intercepted communication specific to the FBI investigation. That call content remained outside the larger intelligence community. Hence Grenell saying: “The IC doesn’t have all the transcripts/summaries…. it wasn’t our product.”

    Like

    • Jan says:

      Sundance covered this a couple of days ago. OVomit knew about the Flynn-Kislyak telephone because Clapper gave him a briefing a day or 2 before 1/5/2017, using the FBI CR, which were given to Clapper by Comey

      The EOC for Crossfire Hurricane was written by Peter Strzok, whom seemed to have close connections w/Brennan

      Like

      • botchedcasuality says:

        Isn’t that connection with Brennan the reason that there is speculation that Stozk was employed by the CIA, inserted into the FBI?

        Like

  3. msalicia56 says:

    I still want to know —what was “the lie”? Was it about “sanctions”, Turkey or what exactly? Is “the lie” that everyone says Flynn admitted to the one he allegedly told to Pence? Again, what was it?

    Like

  4. msalicia56 says:

    I still want to know —what was “the lie”? Was it about “sanctions”, Turkey or what exactly? Is “the lie” that everyone says Flynn admitted to the one he allegedly told to Pence? Again, what was it?

    Like

  5. Jeffrey Coley says:

    So, in summary: The entire Flynn prosecution is based on a transcript nobody has seen, and a report written by liars and perjurers.

    General Flynn is where he is today and there isn’t even any evidence that ANYTHING ever happened.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s