Devin Nunes Discusses Unmasking: “It’s Much Worse Than This” – The Entire Trump Transition Was Under Surveillance…

First things first: ♦Understand Obama’s Surveillance Operation HERE.  ♦Michael Flynn wasn’t under a FISA (Title-1) HERE …. that’s the background.

Devin Nunes appears with Lou Dobbs to discuss the recent list of Obama-era officials who unmasked NSA intercepts of Michael Flynn talking to foreign government officials.  Rep. Nunes reminds the audience that Flynn is only one person within a much larger group of Trump transition team members who were under surveillance by Team Obama.

March 27, 2017, then House Intelligence Committee Chairman, Devin Nunes, held a brief press conference and stated he was provided intelligence reports brought to him by unnamed sources including ‘significant information’ about President-Elect Trump and his transition team.

These reports included unmaskings of President Trump campaign officials; and included Donald Trump himself…. You know what that means:

1.) …”On numerous occasions the [Obama] intelligence community incidentally collected information about U.S. citizens involved in the Trump transition.”

2.) “Details about U.S. persons associated with the incoming administration; details with little or no apparent foreign intelligence value were widely disseminated in intelligence community reporting.”

3.) “Third, I have confirmed that additional names of Trump transition members were unmasked.”

4.) “Fourth and finally, I want to be clear; none of this surveillance was related to Russia, or the investigation of Russian activities, or of the Trump team.

“The House Intelligence Committee will thoroughly investigate surveillance and its subsequent dissemination, to determine a few things here that I want to read off:”

  • “Who was aware of it?”
  • “Why it was not disclosed to congress?”
  • “Who requested and authorized the additional unmasking?”
  • “Whether anyone directed the intelligence community to focus on Trump associates?”
  • “And whether any laws, regulations or procedures were violated?”

“I have asked the Directors of the FBI, NSA and CIA to expeditiously comply with my March 15th letter -that you all received a couple of weeks ago- and to provide a full account of these surveillance activities.”


This entry was posted in 4th Amendment, 6th Amendment, AG Bill Barr, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Cold Anger, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, Election 2016, Election 2020, FBI, media bias, President Trump, Spygate, Spying, THE BIG UGLY, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

208 Responses to Devin Nunes Discusses Unmasking: “It’s Much Worse Than This” – The Entire Trump Transition Was Under Surveillance…

  1. ncedgar says:

    What was it that Evelyn Farkas was saying about Obama Admin sharing information about Trump Campaign? Something about, If the Trump Admin knew how they were collecting this information….” Well, here it is.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Moe Grimm says:

      Frkas” first interview to msnbc – que up at 04:40. I’d always been aware of guv corruption and had been even more and increasingly suspicious from early 2016 Dec. and on, then saw the original (first) Farkas interview that night and it changed me. Literally changed me for good. I’ve never been this angry since and for this long… now more everyday. Our Founding Fathers would have already been shooting, likely 25 years ago at that.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. CNN_sucks says:

    All these ObamaO henchmen concocted fake stories to the media to frame Flynn. Bring the motherload of lawsuits, Flynn.

    Liked by 3 people

  3. Lottacats says:

    Evelyn Farkas 3/2/17 MSNBC


  4. Bogeyfree says:


    You know what this means??? Was the question.

    The answer is………………

    President Trump IS the 5th name on the Scope Memo that was redacted.

    Liked by 6 people

  5. jengancworld says:

    Unfortunately the only unmasking we’re going to hear about on the news are stories of people who refuse to wear masks!

    Liked by 5 people

  6. Nunes for Prez 24 says:

    God Bless this patriot and true hero of this country. He has consistently stood up to the Cabal, at times seemingly on his lonesome, but he’s always standing is our man, Dev. And here he is standing again showing some extra fire today with some rather colorful, and may I say, choice language for the opposition. Give it to em Dev!! Vindication in these document/info dumps has sparked him right and proper and what a sight to see. Lou couldn’t even interrupt him tonight, the Truth was blasting forth from this American warrior with such intensity and high level quality, that he sat there gobsmacked!

    Liked by 4 people

  7. spren says:

    Right after this press conference Nunes was brought up on a phony ethics violation investigation. The Stupid Party has a rule that Republicans holding chairmanships on House committees must step aside until the investigation is completed. This side-lined Nunes from his leadership role for several months until finally the fraudulent charge was dropped.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Laurie Walker says:

    Nunes also said in that 2017 press conference that he thought all the unmaking was done legally, which brings me to the Adm. Rogers testimony about unmasking requests. He (said) that unmasking requests required a legitimate purpose and that there were twenty people at the NSA that honored those requests.

    I wonder if someone requesting an unmasking can send it to a specific agent?

    Liked by 2 people

    • negasht7 says:

      Hey Laurie: I believe Adm Rogers said it can only be viewed by person making request and they are cautioned that they are NOT allowed to share with anyone.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Laurie Walker says:

        My point is that it was all legal, and the requests (according to Nunes) had nothing to do with Russia …. So, what was the legitimate purpose?


    • dreamguardian007 says:

      “I wonder if someone requesting an unmasking can send it to a specific agent?”

      Maybe unmasking requests are granted as routinely as FISA warrants?

      Liked by 1 person

  9. Jeffrey Coley says:

    Recall the story of the frog in hot water: If you drop a frog into hot water he jumps out immediately, but if you slowly raise the temperature you can boil him alive without eliciting a response.

    When Trump was elected, instead of the peaceful transfer of power the entire DC apparatus treated the duly elected President and his team as a hostile foreign invader. Just think about how utterly wrong that is.

    But like the frog in the slowly heating water … everyone is getting into the deep weeds of what constitutes an investigation and the tools used therein, instead of realizing the entire thing was an unprecedented outrage against the Constitution as bizarre and horrible as placing a frog into water on a hot plate to boil him alive.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. beach lover says:

    Just reread this…

    “4.) “Fourth and finally, I want to be clear; none of this surveillance was related to Russia, or the investigation of Russian activities, OR THE TRUMP TEAM”

    Flynn was on THE TRUMP TEAM. So Nunes wasn’t talking specifically about unmasking Flynn as one of those most concerned unmaskings.

    There’s more coming out that is gonna be mind blowing. Either it is being withheld to protect the guilty, or as others have wondered, it is now being used in front of a grand jury by Durham.

    Finally, hopefully it will be pushed more today, that many of the “unmasking dates” were BEFORE the Kislyak phone call. So, what was the purpose of those?

    Of course we know since Sundance has been so on top of this… we get the advantage of knowing the skinny. Some media (Fox) is slowly coming around to where we were 3 yrs ago!!


  11. Lots of villains. But also many heroes .. with Nunes & Adm. Rogers in starring roles.

    Liked by 2 people

  12. TwoLaine says:

    I would not be at all surprised if this and the deliveries of white substances to Don, Jr.’s wife weren’t the nails in the coffin to end their marriage.

    What mother of 5 young children would want to live or her children to live under this insane scrutiny and mutiny?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s