Tom Cotton Discusses COVID-19 as a Pandemic Virus That Escaped a Laboratory in Communist Wuhan, China…

Senator Tom Cotton appears on Fox News to discuss the latest revelations that COVID-19 came out of a laboratory in Wuhan, China.  Martha MacCallum attempts to push the Beijing propaganda of wounded panda as a victim; Senator Cotton outlines the importance of accepting that China is a communist totalitarian state.

This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, CDC, China, Communist, Conspiracy ?, Coronavirus, Death Threats, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Donald Trump, Economy, Hong Kong, Infectious Disease, Legislation, media bias, Notorious Liars, propaganda, Travel, Uncategorized, USA. Bookmark the permalink.

105 Responses to Tom Cotton Discusses COVID-19 as a Pandemic Virus That Escaped a Laboratory in Communist Wuhan, China…

  1. Maccallum is now wearing the resting constipated face, we all have come to recognize.

    Liked by 11 people

  2. TheWanderingStar says:

    Martha MacCallum belongs in a wet market.

    Liked by 9 people

  3. 335blues says:

    Candace is a moron, and probably a CCP tool.
    The CCP murders tens of thousands of their citizens every year, and the people she helps
    bring to America are mostly spies. They receive the highest and best training at our
    schools, then return to help the CCP build weapons aimed at us.
    We should end all communist chinese exchange students, and send those here now
    home.

    Liked by 11 people

    • G. Willikers says:

      Don’t forget all of the Confucius Institutes that have been set up in all of our best research schools – they’re not there to hand out fortune cookies. They siphon our latest university research straight out of the labs and try to recruit the researches into working for Beijing.

      Liked by 7 people

      • margarite1 says:

        I know someone who worked for Nike and was sent to Hong Kong to work with the Chinese on the Olympics. He said the Chinese were anti American racists. And yet…our corporations drool at selling to them, our universities gobble their money, our liberals are bribed to sell us out to them and much of our population is addicted to their cheap crap they sell to us.

        All I can do is try to examine every label and if it says “made in China” then I won’t buy it.

        Liked by 16 people

        • Heine Ootenvault says:

          Thank you Margarite, I also inquire from the company I purchase from if it is made in China and let them know I will purchase no more Chinese products. It has got to start somewhere. Just bought a beautiful pair of Swiss pruners after going through about 6 cheap pieces of crap from Virus-land. I have had it.

          Liked by 3 people

        • “ ..examine every label…made in China..” Good luck, buy some microscopic lens- type glasses for super small print. “Distributed in ———-, sold in———, foreign ingredients from Asia, assembled in USA, distributed in USA. Made in USA with imported ingredients. All of this in microscopic ‘backside of the label’ printing, is what they do hide the word CHINA. Deliberately sly and crafty, to hide the fact of the product’s true origination from Communist China. In many cases this packaging and motivation is designed here in America, North and South.

          Like

  4. TradeBait says:

    Martha is just there for the paycheck. Useless.

    Liked by 3 people

    • FrankieZee says:

      I wonder if she got where she is at, by laying on the casting couch.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Tall Texan says:

        I can neither confirm nor deny….

        Like

      • dallasdan says:

        I am assured by male and female friends alike that it is a common, but far from universal, path to promotion. It has always been an “unstoppable force.” As the young people say, “It is what it is.”

        I strongly suspect it is prevalent in her business.

        Like

  5. GB Bari says:

    Sen. Cotton handled those questions very adroitly and very succinctly. He left nothing to false inference although I am sure some media hacks will attempt it.

    IMHO McCallum was fine in this interview. She asked clear questions without any false premises and did not push back against any of Senator Cotton’s replies.

    Yes the exchange student coordinator asking the question was another leftwing tool that was intended for the President and McCallum actually sounded like she agreed with Cotton’s reply.

    Liked by 13 people

    • Sentient says:

      Agree that Cotton is balanced and doesn’t assert what can’t be proven. Pompeo needs to make sure he doesn’t get out over his skis. People can see that the virus erupted near the Wuhan labs. They can draw their own conclusions.

      Liked by 4 people

      • GB Bari says:

        Good point about Pompeo, but I don’t think he says anything he cannot prove. However Cotton did mention TWO labs in Wuhan. That perked my ears because up to now, I had only read of one lab.

        Liked by 5 people

        • Dutchman says:

          G.B.
          Not the first time I have heard of two labs.

          If the Zoo keeper, unlocks the gate to the gorilla cage, opens it, and lays a trail of bananas from the open gate of the gorilla cage, to the entrance to the Zoo, …..

          Would we believe the Zoo keeper, when he saud the gorilla “Escaped!”?

          Asking for a friend. The timing is just too propitious, for me to believe this was an accident.

          Liked by 3 people

          • Linda K. says:

            Good point, Dutchman. The Chinese are ruthless and we limit our response to them with political correctness so we don’t offend. There was also the arrest of the Harvard chem professor in January. He is connected to the Wuhan lab as well. Odd timing.
            It would seem the release was accidental unless the Chinese decided to test the efficacy of the virus on their own population before sending it abroad.

            Like

            • Dutchman says:

              It is hard to ‘think’ like totally ruthless people, when you aren’t totally ruthless yourself.

              Suppose you have this virus, and you know its not really THAT fatal, that its VERY contagious, but only effects (what we now know are) the ‘vulnerable’ population.

              Hmmm,,,”HOW,can we ‘weoponise’ it?”
              By releasing it in WUHAN, and NOT quarantining the vulnerables. Then allow people from Wuhan to spread to world, while restricting from China.
              Deport all western reporters, block WHO coming in, etc.

              In short, “fool” the rest of the World into believing they had no choice, but to go into lockdown, to prevent hospitals being overwhelmed.
              By the time they figure out all they had to do was quarantine vulnerables, and surround with care givers with immunity, while haveing rest of population developherd immunity, its too late!
              ???

              Liked by 1 person

            • Dwayne Diesel says:

              I think that the young man’s arrest as well as the arrest and death fo the Chinese Dr. who tried to warn the rest of us, are two of the key factors Pompeo and Trump may be alluding to in regard to evidence.

              Like

          • GB Bari says:

            Oh yes. I fully agree about timing vs. claim of “accident”…..

            Liked by 1 person

        • nimrodman says:

          Yes, two labs in Wuhan
          One is Level Two Containment
          The other is Level Four Containment

          I think they were doing bat research at the looser one, the level two

          I’ll paste in a link I read yesterday

          Wuhan virus lab ‘cover-up’: Startling photos of scientists wearing little protection as they handle deadly bat samples vanish from website of Chinese institute at the centre of global suspicion over pandemic
          https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8281085/Wuhan-virus-lab-cover-up.html

          Liked by 2 people

          • nimrodman says:

            Actually there are 2 labs and BOTH labs research bat coronaviruses, even tho the level 2 lab has much less stringent containment

            Two labs:
            – Institute of Virology – level 4
            – Wuhan Centre for Disease Control – level 2

            Wuhan Centre for Disease Control – is also thought to have carried out experiments on animals such as bats to examine transmission of coronaviruses, although it only has level 2 status.

            There’s confusing cross-chatter about the source of the virus in the press, some of it intentionally mean to confuse or obscure

            There’s a scientific paper saying the virus “comes from nature” rather than having been genetically altered or “created” in a lab

            Leftys shorten this to “it came from nature, not a lab”

            The possibility they ignore is that the virus could well have been natural (came from nature) but also leaked from a lab, either by infecting a researcher as patient one or from materials disposal or even lab air exhaust

            So the virus could well have “come from nature” and also “come from the lab”

            Sequence
            – virus was in nature
            – in bats
            – researchers collect bats
            – now the virus “that came from nature” is also “in a bat” and “in the lab”
            – later, the virus that was in the lab leaks to the environment

            So the virus can well have “come from nature” and yet still have “come from the lab”

            But liberals must pretend not to know things so you’ll continue to see this false dichotomy trumpeted in the lefty press, look out for it and you’ll see I’m not wrong:

            “it came from nature, not a lab”

            Liked by 3 people

            • Bulldog84 says:

              If you are not familiar with a fellow named Peter Daszak, try searching him. He is president of one of the companies that received federal funds for bat virus research, and sent the money to China.

              He he quite open about what was being done in China, but doesn’t realize that his defenses of the research actually support a conclusion of accidental spread. 15,000 samples of bat poo taken in the wild and toted to labs in heavily populated cities — and no errors?

              Like

            • Dwayne Diesel says:

              And more so, just because it originated from nature doesn’t mean it wasn’t altered while in the lab. It’s what they do in the labs. Stupid humans messing with nature’s most dangerous micro-organisms to make them more transportable and more…..for some reason more deadly- you know, so they can study them…..for our benefit.

              These labs will be the reason the human race becomes extinct. They will bio-engineer something…..for weapons more than likely (under the auspice of helping combat disease) and it will get out. Not on purpose but by accident. A year later humans are no longer the dominant species on the planet. Killed off by our own stupidity.

              Liked by 3 people

              • nimrodman says:

                just because it originated from nature doesn’t mean it wasn’t altered while in the lab

                Yes, that’s true, but the one authoritative-looking scientific paper I’ve read says that the variant of virus that’s causing the pandemic does NOT look like it was altered. Now, there may be many more variants still in the lab that have been altered, but this research paper says the variant that’s circulating hasn’t been

                So for now, it looks like a thesis that “it escaped from a lab” is more tenable than “it was created in a lab”, at least until there’s a bulletproof scientific analysis that comes out saying that it WAS “lab-created”

                Here’s that paper below – to my understanding it says that the circulating variant of the virus is unmodified, or “came from nature” as some same. My comment upthread was to argue that yes – it may have “came from nature”, but then it might have been in a bat in nature that was brought into a lab and the virus escaped from the lab. So it could have “came from nature” yet also “came from a lab” – that the 2 aren’t necessarily contradictory or exclusive.

                The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2
                https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9

                Conclusion sentence from the introduction:
                Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus.

                Liked by 1 person

          • adam says:

            Don’t put too much stock in photos of people in labs. They came through all the time to take little snaps of us and the caption WAS NEVER about what we were actually doing. Oh, and we almost never wear lab coats, eye goggles, etc.! That stuff is only used when actually needed but the photographers loved it so we put it on. We also mixed up flasks with food coloring in liquids for them, too. Really – most of the liquids in labs are water-clear!

            Maybe it’s different in China but considering we trained most of the Chinese scientists … Oh, you didn’t know that? Look into NIH stats for Chinese nationals working on Federally funded grants. They’re hired because they work longer hours for the bottom of the pay scale. Really. Never mind the backdoor politics for getting them green cards, but I digress.

            Liked by 5 people

            • nimrodman says:

              thanks for the tip about photos

              was well aware we trained and even funded their operations, but thanks

              Like

            • mike says:

              Nevertheless, poor safety in the movies often reflects reality – their best foot forward.

              In 1980 our small lab had a publicity movie with technicians adroitly skinnying up 2 storey equipment just like in real life, fast and efficient. No hard hats, missing safety equipment. Only later, management reviewing the movie felt it was good but something was wrong, couldn’t quite put a finger on it. Then they realized the film was a liability and OSHA disaster in the making. Film scrapped.

              Liked by 2 people

          • GB Bari says:

            OK Nim, thanks. I missed that “detail”.

            Like

  6. Magabear says:

    So FEMA let out an “unvetted” report that 3000 people a day will die due to (gasp) states letting people out of their homes and resuming semi-normal life again. Oh no!!!!😯

    The BS that our imbedded beaurocrats keep throwing up against this administration has no equal.

    Liked by 11 people

  7. Deplorable_Infidel says:

    “Senator Cotton outlines the importance of accepting that China is a communist totalitarian state.”

    I could not understand 30 or 40 years ago how we could outsource most of our manufacturing, etc. overseas. As an ordinary American patriot, it just seemed to defy logic, common sense and practicality.

    My male BF’s father has had a saying, “We have the best politicians that money can buy”.

    It was not until I found CTH several years ago that I was able to read a simple to understand, yet through, explanation of how that took place. I certainly did not hear about it from the MSM, even though I have known about alternative media outlets since the 1980’s.

    Liked by 5 people

  8. The Devilbat says:

    This video tells the truth. The question is, was it China or Bill Gates who released the virus? Watch this video and be shocked by its stunning revelations. Things are far worse than we thought.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Right to reply says:

      Not working though, is it. Its only effect is on those who have been given everything by a dumb Mommy, Daddy, or government benefit that insists people should have what they never had.

      Parents are to blame for the state of America. Every day they drop them at the Marxist school gate to they can give their ungrateful little sh8ts everything they never had. Ask them, what did they never have?

      Liked by 2 people

      • wondering999 says:

        My kids were not ungrateful little sh8ts. And I gave them everything I had, like most parents. Because they made life worthwhile

        I’d chalk up our problems to worshiping “graven images” — idealizing particular activities, professions, and people as if they had no flaws, refusing to notice corruption when it’s in front of our faces.

        Parents are selfless, except when we aren’t.
        Schools are valuable, except when they don’t teach anything that’s valuable, and just extract tax dollars to waste the time of children and bully them.
        Priests and pastors are holy, except for the ones who clearly, are not….
        Doctors and nurses and other health professions are sanctified by their work… except, when they are just in it for the $$$, and awefilled respect…
        We need to look at reality instead of what we’d like to believe

        Liked by 3 people

      • willthesuevi says:

        Raise your children, spoil your grandchildren.

        Spoil your children, raise your grandchildren.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Kimmy K says:

      Thanks Devilbat!
      Going to pass this one around…America needs more Pastors like him!

      Like

  9. T2020 says:

    “Now, Martha. Let’s pull out our history books and see what we find under ‘Communist China’, OKaaaaaay?”

    Liked by 2 people

  10. CanaCon says:

    In terms of establishing the CCP’s responsibility for this disaster, confirming the origin of the virus is almost incidental other than for scientific purposes.

    The fact that they restricted domestic travel in and out of Wuhan but allowed international travel to continue says it all.

    Liked by 8 people

  11. Deplorable_Infidel says:

    “the latest revelations that COVID-19 came out of a laboratory in Wuhan, China.”

    I had nagging suspicions w/o any solid proof of that months ago. With all these countries going into a full blown lockdown, I figured it might be prudent to hunker down for a little while until more information becomes available.

    It would not surprise me that the Chinese are fascinated by crawling into cramped, filthy bat caves where no human has any business being in, taking samples of obscure viruses and playing around with them in a lab to see what they can come up with.

    Then if/when an “accident” happens, the Chinese communists are going to attempt a cover-up and refuse to accept any responsibility. No surprise there, either.

    Well we were told we could go back to normal after the “curve was flattened”. That has passed and now the excuses change almost daily of why we cannot (sure we can- just DO IT).

    I suspect that the lock down will last just long enough to bankrupt much of the private health care in the USA.

    I wish I had purchased stock in Plexiglas manufacturing and fabrication three months ago.

    Liked by 5 people

  12. Michael Fox says:

    I don’t have the link at my fingertips right now but the Epoch Times put out a pretty convincing investigative video within the last month or so about the Chinese working on this specific virus that originated from a type of bat.

    IIRC, according to the video this bat virus in its natural state could not enter human cells. After about six or seven years of their top “scientists” working to modify it, with CRSPR I believe, they were successful in accomplishing the goal of it being able to enter human cells.

    Apparently, our scientists have been able to analyze its DNA and from this have determined that it is something they refer to as recombinant. And apparently that means only could have been created intentionally by human modification.

    The video shows the Chinese being very proud of their long term effort and success since they pranced/allowed the lead female scientist on the project to report her results to a substantial scientific conference in China every few years since it started.

    This is the gist of the story. (I may have flubbed something in my recollection)

    Beyond that, I don’t believe we know yet that its release from the Level 4 Wuhan Lab was accidental or intentional.

    My gut tells me it’s NOT from eating bats. My gut also tells me to NEVER AGAIN EVEN WATCH anyone eating bats.

    Liked by 3 people

    • AloftWalt says:

      Other scientists have posited that there are two HIV gene sequences in the virus which would never occurred through natural mutations. Makes one wonder.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Michael Fox says:

        Exactly, Walt. Those two genes in the Covid-19 are a 100% match to the two genes in the other virus you mentioned which, as you said, could not have occurred through a natural mutation. Which means this was most likely done by human reengineering.

        I found the link to the Epoch Times video. Hopefully, I can post it here.

        https://www.theepochtimes.com/coronavirusfilm

        Liked by 3 people

        • Dutchman says:

          Knowing what we know about CCP, its hard to fathom they wouldn’t “try this virus out”, to learn what you can’t learn in a lab.

          After all, if you have no problem rounding up a million “political prisoners”, and tissue typing them as part of processing, in order to have a large pool of organ donors,……
          Why WOULDN’T you put say,…1000 of them in a seperate camp, infect one and see what happens?

          After all, its the only way to know. I think the suppression of Info, was because they knew the true nature of the virus.

          IF we knew then, what we know now, would we have done the shut in?

          Or, as has been suggested, would we have had the vulnerable shut in?

          If we had the gene sequence, when first isolated, by that scientist in China, how much farther would our research be?

          And, wasn’t it convenient for the CCP, that they already had WHO director in their pocket?

          It was a CON; the ousting of western reporters, the photos of bodies were probably REAL, but it was all to create the impression of a far deadlier virus, than it actually is.

          They weren’t ‘covering up’ out of embarrasment; it was,a KEY part of their plan, to use the virus as an ECONOMIC weopon,….
          And it was devastatingly effective.

          Liked by 8 people

          • wondering999 says:

            Keep in mind also that there had been a revolt in Wuhan during the Summer 2019, because of garbage incinerator construction that residents objected to

            How many of Wuhan people who protested the garbage incinerators, survived the epidemic in Wuhan? During “lockdown” it’s fairly simple to isolate and drag people out, and explain all the screaming to the neighbors (“this woman has Covid and doesn’t submit to quarantine” instead of “we’re taking her away to prison”)

            Liked by 1 person

          • Dwayne Diesel says:

            Dutch, this was my thought on this from the get-go. Well, after things started to appear that this was a man-made release- too coincidental that two labs are located in Wuhan, too coincidental that so many new hospitals were already built-in Wuhan, and too coincidental that nowhere else in China has seemed to be impacted.

            I told my wife in early March that the Chinese did this as an act of economic war due to the fact our tariffs have decimated them. She thought I was crazy- she said, wouldn’t they make it more deadly then if that was the case? I said nope. Look at event 201 in December in NYC. That event concluded it’s all about the narrative…..and poof, a no-nothing virus was painted as being overblown and super deadly. Why? How? The CCP convinced the WHO (bought and paid for by the CCP) and the WHO convinced the world. And the MSM ate up the hype and used their cameras and talking heads to use a high-powered microscope to analyze the deaths and cases in a vacuum (oh, you can’t compare to other diseases, this is different……how often have you heard that said?) And here we are in May learning that this virus is a nothing…..a big fat nothing…..but hey….don’t worry…..

            The Chinese now know how the U.S. (and the rest of the civilized world) will respond to something like this. Their next attempt will be deadlier…..not much more deadly (they can’t control it amongst their citizens if they did) but rather just deadlier enough to cause those who recovered to not be able to recover and die. The infection rate and transmission may be the same…just that if you get it, your done. And it will be transmittable in a manner that we can’t stop with our measures.

            Just my thoughts and I wouldn’t put it past the CCP at all.

            Like

            • Dutchman says:

              The most easily transmitted, IS via respiratory, hence while there ARE other routes, its the most likely.
              And, not sure they WILL “try it again”, as they don’t want to kill off the,Worlds population, they want to enslave it.

              But yes, it was used as an ECONOMIC weopon; they watched and learned, when Reagan ended the cold war, by ECONOMICS.
              Hence, their mercantalist hegemonic approach to dealing with the World; they probably look at it that they are acting in self-defence;
              They CAN NOT remain in control of CHINA, if they play by the rules; Conmunism CAN NOT compete, hence it MUST cheat.
              So, the notion of actually complying with PDJT’s reasonable demands (that they quit cheating) is, for them, a suicide pact.

              After reading how they insisted on including a clause in the phase one agreement (common in commercial agreements, but very UNcommon in Trade agreements) relieving them of their obligations in the event of a “natural” disaster, I have any small remaining doubts that this was an accident, resolved.

              They did this on PURPOSE, to get out of the obligations of the phase one trade agreement.

              No doubt in my mind. This is also why the attempt to pass it off as from the ‘wet market’; so “NATURAL” rather than from the lab, so NOT “Natural” and therefore not an excuse to reneg on agreement.

              This not only shows a “cold-bloodedness” which SHOULD have already been apperent, it shows a DESPERATION; PDJT has them “on the ropes”; they have no choice BUT to agree to his terms, and yet for their survival (CCP as dominant force in CHINA, I mean)they CAN NOT agree, as it would mean the end of their reign.

              WW4, and reaching a very critical phase.

              Liked by 1 person

              • Dwayne Diesel says:

                We are on the same page. Two of their generals were talking about how China can’t beat the U.S. in a war, a real physical war, they said no one can if the U.S. used it’s full might. But they did talk about using economics and biologics as a way to get US, the people, to do their fighting for them. Collapse us economically and get us fighting each other.

                What scares me is not the CCP trying this….but rather how easily my fellow countrymen just lay down and give up their rights literally over a no-nothing virus…..

                Like

                • Dutchman says:

                  Yeah, read the link, provided by A2, to the english translation of a PAPER, written in the early 90’s (IIRC) by two cournols (sp?) in the CHICOM equivalent of their war college.
                  They discussed, at length, assymetrical warfare; cyber, technology, yes bacterial, and ECONOMIC warfare against the world, and especially the U.S.

                  IMHO, it goes back to the end of the Cold war, (WW3); Firstly, CHINA, which had always been second fiddle to the USSR, inherited the ‘Mantle’ as the State sponsor for marxist (or GLOBAL) Conmunism, with all that entails, especially the networks of infiltration the Soviets established.

                  Secondly, they “got it”; it wasn’t about “big hairy weopons systems”, it was that Reagan recognised an essential truth;
                  Conmunism CAN NOT compete with free market capitalism, ECONOMICALLY.

                  Because Conmunism has 3 fatal flaws; inherent in its system is corruption and innefficiency; you see it in EVERY Centrally controlled Conmunist system.
                  And, it stamps out, rather than rewarding innovative thought.
                  Because the same kind of innovative thought that would,develop the “next big thing”, is the same kind of thinking that would challenge the corrupt, innefficient conmunist system; and they MUST have robotic like thinking from the masses.

                  Reagan knew, because free market capitalism was more efficient, that it could afford to spend $ on big hairy weopons systems, and still meet the,basic needs of the people, and Conmunist USSR couldn’t.

                  And again, Chicoms “got it”, and realised the same vulnerability afflicted them.

                  So, they took over and expanded the networks they inherited from the Soviets, and deployed what is probably their greatest weopon; CORRUPTION.
                  They corrupted Bill Clinton (not hard) to get WTO, and they then incentivised the stripping of American manufacturing, exfiltrating wealth and middle class jobs, and with them lifestyles, out of U.S. and to China.
                  They expanded their influence in government, media, USING the $ they were stealing from us, to corrupt even more.

                  It really is breathtaking, in scope.
                  And not JUST the U.S. but around the World. And, not just at the National level; Pompeo gave a speech that,Sundance posted about, talking about how China is working at the Govenor and mayor level.

                  I think $oro$ is working with/for China, Hillary/Obama as well,…CoC, and Mitch too.

                  Conmunism recognises Abes fundamental truth; you CAN NOT fool ALL the people, ALL the time, and attempts to finesse it; “Ah, but we only have to foll ENOUGH people, for long enough, for the useful idiots to put us in POWER.
                  THEN, we will USE that power, to insure we STAY in power, in perpetuity.
                  So far, its never worked for more than about 75 years,…and Chicoms are at about 70.

                  But yes, there are a LOT of deluded, useful idiots,….the question is, are there ENOUGH?

                  Liked by 1 person

                • Dwayne Diesel says:

                  Dutch, well said. Sadly, too many can’t see that…they are fooled. I’ve done business in China. I have been called to the mat politically during their masculine drinking game (entails flasks of Chinese Whiskey) about our way of life. They don’t like when you don’t back down. They know you can’t speak against them politically when standing on Chinese soil and IMO take advantage. I just stare and smile……and then down that damn flask, get the girl t pour another, down it too and then stare at them….usually they don’t take another. If they do….round three begins. I’ve never lost….although, a few times the next morning….darn, if my head wasn’t ringing.

                  Like

                • Dutchman says:

                  Pancreatic enzyme, burns up, that is to say metabolises alcohol so fast/efficiently, you can drink all night and remain cold sober.

                  There is a bullying, using intimidation, in everything they do. Where one or two missile batteries, pointed at Seole or Taiwan would be sufficient to make the point, they have HUNDREDS, not apperently realising that is a “tell” that they never intend to use ANY of them.

                  Deep insecurity, obviousto those who know what to look for.

                  Liked by 1 person

      • Rick says:

        My understanding is HIV is a type of retrovirus found in monkey kidney cells. The Wuhan lab was trying to make a vaccine for the bat corona viruses.

        All animals may carry retroviruses. Mice carry an XMRV type of retrovirus that causes CFS, Leukemia, aggressive prostate cancer, Autism etc.

        I believe Mikovits said the only way animal viruses/retroviruses transmit from animals to people is through growing the virus in live animal tissue then injecting into human blood.

        She said all these new viruses found in animals are propagated by our dirty institutions, the NIH, NIAID, FDA, CDC, HHS NCI et al, that we should close them all and focus on genuine health.

        The CDC readily admits they make vaccines by growing viruses in animal tissue. Even now, this years flu shot is grown in undisclosed animal tissue. The possibility of receiving a host of chronic diseases from HIV to XMRV or LT-1 exists in this years Flu vaccine. Funny how they are vague in describing which animal’s tissue they are using this time around, isn’t it?

        Mikovits was a brilliant scientist whose career was destroyed by Fauci and Harold Whittmore, who’s now in prison over illegal campaign contributions to former Senator Harry Reid.

        https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ep-178-top-virologist-blows-whistle-on-covid-19/id1161499979?i=1000472295443

        Liked by 3 people

  13. montanamel says:

    Truth is spoken here…
    Don’t forget to include the money trail.. From Gates to Fausci and on to China.
    There are many more…they all hang out at Davos Switzerland every January…
    Then, you find all sorts of different critters crawling around, like WHO, CDC(China)…etc.
    And, they all shake hands thru Big Pharma and xxx Foundation(s), etc…
    Yep…China did it, after being paid by the US Govt in a grant that no one remembers…
    Wonder how many secret tech methods came over with that little chore for NWO
    There are 3 strikes and you’re out here:
    They, the Chinese, LIED about it from the start when it first leaked to the world press.
    They, the Chinese, then stopped DOMESTIC air travel in/out of Wuhan – no notice to world.
    They, the Chinese, stone-walled the world for 16 days in January to HORDE PPE …
    YOU’RE OUT…. call in the team and haul the Dead Panda out of the Arena…

    I’m thinking major…full blown EMBARGO / BARRICADE until they cough up say 2 Trillion to the USA alone…Gold will do nicely…they have it, or nearly that much… US Bonds can make up the short fall…. No play the game square….we can always “erase” the CUSIP numbers, eh?..

    Liked by 8 people

  14. Michael Fox says:

    This is an eleven minute video from the protest in Sacramento, California on either Friday 5/1 or Saturday 5/2. With people like this on our side, no communist China virus OR police tactics are going to tear down our nation.

    When I grow up I wanna be like this guy.

    Liked by 4 people

    • georgehumphries9802 says:

      Dr Gordy – I applaud everything that you said today. Now, if you can, do this same type of speech concerning illegal immigration that unlawfully costs all Americans money that we didn’t authorize.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Dwayne Diesel says:

      This is now. What will those bootlicking baton waving fascists do when people are done with the talking? These “tough guys” were just slapped with truth by the megaphone guy. And they stood there like good little Gestapo agents.

      How many more weeks before it gets to the point where people just charge them because they are done talking? Would the sniper actually shoot someone? I think the first person shot by a cop over this….will take us back to April 12, 1861, but it won’t be a cannon and it won’t be at Fort Sumter…rather it will be the front steps of some town USA’s capital building or the town square.

      Take a video of China and take this one…..no difference between how the government actors behave. The only difference is that in China the megaphone man would have been hunted down and be dead today.

      Liked by 2 people

  15. snowshooze says:

    When you modify a virus so it can infect Humans, and all the sudden it is infecting Humans….
    There is no way you can claim it was an accident.

    Liked by 5 people

  16. snowshooze says:

    When you modify a virus so it can infect Humans, and all the sudden it is infecting Humans….
    There is no way you can claim it was an accident.

    Like

  17. snowshooze says:

    When you modify a virus so it can infect Humans, and all the sudden it is infecting Humans….
    There is no way you can claim it was an accident.

    Like

  18. snowshooze says:

    When you modify a virus so it can infect Humans, and all the sudden it is infecting Humans….
    There is no way you can claim it was an accident.

    Like

  19. Jan says:

    I want to believe in Sen. Tom Cotton. I really, really do. He had an impressive interview with Mark Levin. He gives the right sound bites on Fox News. He’s introducing favorable legislation. He’s on China’s a**. But he’s also on the corrupt Senate Intel Committee.

    We already know we can”t trust any of the other RINOs on Senate Intel, including Rubio.

    Help me please, Sundance!!

    Like

    • Rick says:

      I feel the same way, very little trust.

      Like

    • willthesuevi says:

      Jan,
      Agree, we need to see if he actually does anything.

      Talking is one thing, doing is an entirely different matter. We have all watched Lindsey talk. Of course he never does anything of substance.

      We will see what Sen. Cotton DOES, soon enough.

      Like

  20. regitiger says:

    the quandary and the reality:

    unless an insider leaks evidence we will never know.

    here is why…(I did not stay at a cheap hotel last night, nor am I a former Fort Detrick bio-warfare type)

    there are two methods to “manipulate a virus” …

    One is performed (routinely over the last 20 years by over 20 level 2,3, and 4 labs worldwide:

    this technique is to edit the virus using crispr or other technologies….this is called synthesizing the virus. While crispr technology is the latest and greatest method, it is not the only technology required to perform gene editing. The reason to conduct this is to get a better understanding of how viruses will mutate….it’s a worthwhile scientific endeavor to artificially (and safely) conduct a accelerated series of tests to determine what kinds of viruses “can” potentially develop in the wild. The benefits is that scientists can determine what direction and strategies are best to target anticipating these endemic/pandemic outbreaks will occur. This technique is not without a great deal of controversy, due mostly to the reality that in the US alone, there have been over 40 unique events of dangerous bioforms being accidentally released.

    the other technique is to use the natural method of using animals to mutate and thus gene edit a particular pathogen …the idea is to recreate the same kinds of environments in which zoonological virus make a leap from animal to animal and then to human. This technique is also controversial, because it involves the same “gain of function” paradox as above: intentionally creating a mutated virus where the virality cannot be well predicted…could be a dud..could be a world ender!

    both are considered very serious risky operations, because of demonstrated poor bio-security practices..it only takes one small mistake!…AND because it involves killing lots of animals. (the left loves their bats! and monkeys! and birds!)

    both of these techniques are also used by dozens of nation-state sponsored and private labs for a purely military bio-weapons development purpose.

    Like

    • Rick says:

      Why do they spend so much time on these viruses, knowing that in the absence of growing them in live animal tissues and injecting them into human blood they’ll never be a threat?

      What they are doing with collecting viruses and modifying their gene expressions is tantamount to biological warfare against the republic.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Mellie says:

      regitiger,

      “it’s a worthwhile scientific endeavor to artificially (and safely) conduct a accelerated series of tests to determine what kinds of viruses “can” potentially develop in the wild. The benefits is that scientists can determine what direction and strategies are best to target anticipating these endemic/pandemic outbreaks will occur”

      So . . . which viruses have been determined likely to develop that did in fact develop in the wild?
      Did the Covid 19 viral event get predicted through research?
      And even if it can be predicted to develop what can be done?

      Like

  21. Larry says:

    The Chinese have uploaded 3 versions of the Wuhan-Hu-1 coronavirus to the NCBI GenBank. It is important to note the differences in the genome between these three versions.

    The first version, uploaded January 5, 2020 is here:
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN908947.1

    The second version, uploaded January 14, 2020 is here:
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN908947.2

    The third and current version, uploaded January 17, 2020 is here:
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN908947

    The first question to ask is why upload two revisions of this virus? What changed? To determine that, you need to look at the complete genome contained in the “FASTA” tab:

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN908947.1?report=fasta
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN908947.2?report=fasta
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN908947.3?report=fasta

    You can copy and paste these complete genomes into a spreadsheet and compare. You will find the current version “3” looks nothing like the first two versions. Also, the current version “3” ends in a string of “AAAAAAA’s” that you do not find in nature to a significant degree. You may find the odd string of “AAA’s” but statistically, a string of 33 A’s is rare.

    Why the AAA’s? It sounds like this string will increase the strength of the virus.
    https://bioinformatics.stackexchange.com/questions/11227/why-does-the-sars-cov2-coronavirus-genome-end-in-aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

    Is it nature’s way to tweek the genome by adding a bunch of AAA’s to bump the virility of the virus? I suspect future mutations will attack this string of AAA’s and lower the virility of the virus.

    This looks man made. If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, it probably is a duck.

    Liked by 3 people

  22. pristach says:

    Treepers

    One of the most cogent follows on twitter regarding Wuhan virus Is: @lawrencesellin

    See his latest article https://www.wionews.com/opinions-blogs/how-us-expertise-may-have-inadvertently-contributed-to-covid-19-296512

    Sellin cites Ralph Baric, UNC virologist. Baric knows where all the bodies are buried in the Wuhan lab. He worked there. His patent may have been manipulated, as Sellin’s article suggests.
    But his work on Remdesivir, the Chinese attempt to patent it while cutting short its clinical trial, is all very intriguing as well.

    Liked by 2 people

  23. Matt Bracken says:

    Amazingly, Newsweek has one of the best articles on the subject of the virus escaping from the WIV.
    DR. FAUCI BACKED CONTROVERSIAL WUHAN LAB WITH MILLIONS OF U.S. DOLLARS FOR RISKY CORONAVIRUS RESEARCH

    Newsweek 4/28/20
    https://www.newsweek.com/dr-fauci-backed-controversial-wuhan-lab-millions-us-dollars-risky-coronavirus-research-1500741

    Dr. Anthony Fauci is an adviser to President Donald Trump and something of an American folk hero for his steady, calm leadership during the pandemic crisis. At least one poll shows that Americans trust Fauci more than Trump on the coronavirus pandemic—and few scientists are portrayed on TV by Brad Pitt.

    But just last year, the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the organization led by Dr. Fauci, funded scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and other institutions for work on gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses.

    In 2019, with the backing of NIAID, the National Institutes of Health committed $3.7 million over six years for research that included some gain-of-function work. The program followed another $3.7 million, 5-year project for collecting and studying bat coronaviruses, which ended in 2019, bringing the total to $7.4 million.

    Many scientists have criticized gain of function research, which involves manipulating viruses in the lab to explore their potential for infecting humans, because it creates a risk of starting a pandemic from accidental release.
    [more at the link]

    Liked by 3 people

    • Rick says:

      Biological warfare!

      I’m not nearly as concerned about more infectious viruses as I am the host they are grown in. It is the retroviruses that concern me the most. They have the potential to leave a trail of horrendous Chronic Diseases…, and once they get into your body you can’t get rid of them. They can lie dormant for years, just waiting until you get older and your immune system declines, then they awaken like a sleeping giant to torture you for the rest of your days.

      If you’re a child whose immune system isn’t developed yet, your entire life can be ruined for life, or ended.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Michael Fox says:

      Matt, I agree, it IS amazing that Newsweek would provide this article.

      The article pretty closely follows the info from the Epoch Times video I referenced upthread.

      Now I’m a bit skeptical and wonder how deep this “origin of virus” goes and who IS involved.

      I cancelled my Newsweek subscription in 2007 when they touted Senator Obama as someone to seriously look at for president. They described him as a constitutional professor with charisma, an amazing orator with good looks, one of the most intelligent young politicians that has ever risen so quickly. Basically, just a perfect specimen.

      Oh, other than this tiny issue maybe to consider…

      He sat in “G** Damn America” Reverend Wright’s church for twenty years absorbing Black Liberation Theology preaching BUT, nah, nothing substantial to see there. Obama is AMAZING!

      I know it sounds kinda gross but, I was reading this crapola while on my bathroom throne and actually called Newsweek from my throne to cancel my subscription.

      Since then, my eyes have been opening more and more. Since becoming a Treeper in 2015, my eyes are nearly fully open.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Orygun says:

      “Folk Hero”…that guy talks out of the corners of his mouth and everyday is a new day for him. New day new lie. Birx and him missed their calling they can talk in circles for hours.

      Liked by 1 person

  24. Scott B. says:

    “Martha, Martha…” – Luke 10:41

    Like

  25. lfhbrave says:

    It seems that the globalists, both those in the scientific community doing cya and in the five eyes, are starting a cover-up operation on the origin of the corona virus, spearheaded by a research article published in Nature-Medicine in March 17 claiming the virus is natural in origin and not man-made. The Nature article’s conclusion is full of holes but surprisingly very few peers asking questions and the IC accepted the conclusion wholeheartedly. This cover-up operation could be bigger in scale than the Russian hoax cover-up.

    Like

  26. KBR says:

    When the bats are wiped out (due to fears promoted by population-reductionists), then a new mosquito borne abortion-virus (Zika 2.0) will be more successful in reducing world population.

    Like

  27. snowshooze says:

    If you take a virus, and modify it so it can infect Humans, and all of the sudden it starts infecting Humans, there is no way you could call thiat an accident.

    Liked by 1 person

  28. I'm BIG says:

    Time for America to WAKE UP!

    Like

  29. I'm BIG says:

    Wake up America! The Plandemic Documentary.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s