The Great Lou Dobbs Outlines a Moment The DOJ Went Wrong – Durham, FISC and Barr Seemingly Concur…

Lou Dobbs doesn’t suffer fools easily; he prefers to cut through the filibuster and get to the heart of the matter.  That approach is one reason his show is highly successful.

Within a similar outlook… Where we are now is the direct result of bad decisions where we came from. Going forward on the same corrupt path only takes us further in the wrong direction. This natural truism is the current dilemma for AG Bill Barr.

During his show tonight Lou Dobbs takes the audience back to a very specific decision by the DOJ; a fork-in-the-road decision that put the department on path traveling further and further away from justice. The specific moment outlined was the DOJ decision to bury the intelligence leak by SSCI Security Director James Wolfe.

[BACKSTORY HERE]

However, amid all the chaff and countermeasures there is good news. When you realize that continuing forward on a path initiated by corrupt decisions only takes you further and further from the truth; you realize there are signs showing the DOJ is indeed reversing course back to the moment when the wrong path was selected.

♦ U.S. Attorney John Durham is reported to be going back to the origination of the Russian Collusion conspiracy. The reversal of a corrupt path taken.

♦ The FISA Court has asked the DOJ to identify and sequester all of the downstream consequences to the fraudulently obtained FISA warrants. A reversal of a corrupt path taken.

♦ And, importantly, there are reports AG Bill Barr has asked a Saint Louis U.S. Attorney to go back through everything surrounding the prosecution of Michael Flynn and re-evaluate the path taken.

I would be remiss if I did not point out the reporting about AG Barr bringing in outside prosecutors to review conduct in prior investigations, happened almost immediately after the FISC deadline for the DOJ to inform the court of their sequestration efforts….

…A subtle (as a brick through a window) connection not identified in media…. Yet.

Perhaps the connection between the FISC required DOJ “sequester” efforts and the DOJ “outside prosecutors” should be just kept between us, ok.

FEBRUARY 14, 2020 WASHINGTON — Attorney General William P. Barr has assigned an outside prosecutor to scrutinize the criminal case against President Trump’s former national security adviser Michael T. Flynn, according to people familiar with the matter.

The review is highly unusual and could trigger more accusations of political interference by top Justice Department officials into the work of career prosecutors.

Mr. Barr has also installed a handful of outside prosecutors to broadly review the handling of other politically sensitive national-security cases in the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington, the people said. The team includes at least one prosecutor from the office of the United States attorney in St. Louis, Jeff Jensen, who is handling the Flynn matter, as well as prosecutors from the office of the deputy attorney general, Jeffrey A. Rosen. (more)

 

This entry was posted in AG Bill Barr, Big Government, Cold Anger, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, Election 2020, FBI, IG Report Comey, IG Report FISA Abuse, IG Report McCabe, James Wolfe Case (SSCI), Legislation, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Russia, THE BIG UGLY, Uncategorized, Wikileaks. Bookmark the permalink.

305 Responses to The Great Lou Dobbs Outlines a Moment The DOJ Went Wrong – Durham, FISC and Barr Seemingly Concur…

  1. Tim Cunningham says:

    Here are some questions Lou Dobbs should ask AG Barr, FBI Director Wray, Majority Leader McConnell, Senator Lindsey Graham, and Rep. James Jordan the next time anyone of them comes on:

    We know the Crossfire Hurricane team abused the FISA process. FBI Director Wray has said the solution is more training, but I have seen no mention of punishing those guilty of asking for FISA while presenting fake evidence to the court.

    Why not discourage abuse of the FISA Court by punishing known abusers? What’s wrong with adding the following legislation to the upcoming FISA renewal?

    Any FBI Agent or Federal Attorney who knowingly or unknowingly presents false or unverified information in support of a FISA application shall, on discovery, be

    1. Be immediately fired from their position with the federal government,
    2. Forfeit their federal immunity from lawsuits,
    3. Be immediately tried before the FISA Court on perjury charges, found guilty under the doctrine of Res Ipse Loquitur (the thing speaks for itself) and sentenced to the maximum sentence for perjury with no possibility of appeal.

    Liked by 3 people

  2. islandpalmtrees says:

    SO WHO MADE THE DECISION FOR THE FORK-IN-THE-ROAD: ROD ROSENSTEIN. AND, WE ALREADY KNOW FROM SUNDANCE THAT BARR IS COVERING FOR ROD ROSENSTEIN.

    So, if Rod Rosenstein gets revealed, because he let Director James Wolfe off, Barr gets revealed?

    Sundance Writes:
    “During his show tonight Lou Dobbs takes the audience back to a very specific decision by the DOJ; a fork-in-the-road decision”

    “The 2017 time period covers Robert Mueller as Special Counsel, Jeff Sessions as AG, Rod Rosenstein as Deputy, Chris Wray replacing James Comey as FBI Director, and eventually David Bowditch replacing Andrew McCabe as Deputy. For all of the important decision-making Jeff Sessions was cut-out by design. For example, the person who made the decisions about SSCI Director James Wolfe’s prosecution was ***Rod Rosenstein.***”
    http://conservativedailypost.com/brennan-interview-coming-but-media-ignores-senators-involvement-in-spy-gate/

    It’s only logical, to assume that if two of the members of the Gang-Of-Eight knew about James Wolfe’s crime, then the rest of the ***Gang-Of-Eight knew***, in this case. Making the Gang-Of-Eight guilty of “Aiding and Abetting” or “accessory after the fact” since they did not act to prosecute or reveal the crime to our justice System. Maybe this is a Color of Law issue to?

    “Think about it. Both gang-of-eight members (Warner/Burr), who happened -as a consequence of the jaw dropping implications- to be two SSCI members who were warned by the FBI that Wolfe was compromised…. and they, along with Feinstein in 2016, were the co-conspirators who used James Wolfe. The ramifications cannot be overstated.
    http://conservativedailypost.com/brennan-interview-coming-but-media-ignores-senators-involvement-in-spy-gate/

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s