Jay Sekulow Discusses Current Status of House Impeachment Case…

President Trump’s co-lead counsel, Jay Sekulow, discusses his perspective on the opening arguments for the House impeachment case.   As Sekulow notes, so far the House appears to be attempting to leverage impeachment for a difference in foreign policy outlooks:

This entry was posted in 4th Amendment, 6th Amendment, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Donald Trump, Impeachment, Legislation, media bias, Nancy Pelosi, Notorious Liars, President Trump, propaganda, Russia, Ukraine, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

124 Responses to Jay Sekulow Discusses Current Status of House Impeachment Case…

  1. WSB says:

    These swamp creatures are BS crazy!!!!

    Liked by 16 people

  2. todayistheday99 says:

    If I ever needed a lawyer, Jay would be my #1 choice.

    Liked by 14 people

    • TheWanderingStar says:

      Or John Ratliff. Definitely not Rooster Gowdy!

      Liked by 7 people

      • Bill Durham says:

        WHAT IS GOING ON????
        Senator John Kennedy is now getting squishy. He is claiming he learned lots of new information??? Wtf

        Liked by 1 person

        • TheWanderingStar says:

          Hopefully it is his Southern Sarcasm.

          Liked by 5 people

          • lfdale says:

            Kennedy is playing them, making them think he could say something they wanted to hear, and they will have him on again thinking the same and then he will use his ole southern drawl to kick their collective assess and they will not know what hit them. Just like in most cases, since they are so incompetent and biased,

            Like

        • gda53 says:

          This is spin or misunderstanding.

          I’ll wager quite a lot that Sen. Kennedy will NOT be squishy on this nonsense.

          Liked by 3 people

        • tucker7518 says:

          What could he have learned today?

          Liked by 2 people

        • deepdivemaga says:

          Meadows and Radcliffe were briefing the Senators a few weeks ago and were surprised about how *LITTLE* the Senators knew about this entire impeachment fiasco & Ukrainian story. I’m sure these Senators ARE learning a lot, they came into this woefully unprepared.

          Liked by 2 people

        • ms doodlebug says:

          Without ‘evidence’, any ‘new’ information from Schiff is seen through what we know – that Schiff misrepresents a lot, exaggerates a lot and lies a lot.

          Like

          • Mr e-man says:

            It seemed to me that yesterday was just 8 hours of storytelling by the House Managers.. They presented no evidence to back up their claim other than a few cherry picked videos snips and comments.

            It was all about setting the narrative.

            For instance Giuliani ordered by Trump to go to Ukraine and smear the Ambassador so he would have an excuse to remove her. The President didn’t need to set up a smear campaign to remove an Ambassador. He simply needed to tell the State Department to remove her. He doesn’t need a reason.

            But hey present their 24 hours and Trump (and us) will finally get our day in court that has been denied for 3 years. And Schiff cannot control the process. Schumer is trying but he is no match for the serial liar Schiff.

            Liked by 1 person

            • ms doodlebug says:

              Schiff is now whining President Trump’s actions were not ‘officially’ foreign policy talking points. Really? It was Obama’s foreign policy talking points that got us in the mess. That’s why we elected President Trump.

              Now he’s saying President Trump never mentioned corruption in his phone call with President Zelensky. Wrong. He mentioned the Bidens. He mentioned the server. He was very specific about corruption that affects our country.

              Like

    • Snellvillebob says:

      The office of the President of the United States has it’s perks.

      Like

      • Bill Durham says:

        Laura ingraham with new Ukraine story on White House meeting 1/16 with Biden, whistle blower, and Ukrainians dealing with Hunter and burisma and killing an investigation. Tic tic. Lee Smith and Kim strassel could be on this too. It’s a Ken Vogel story that got spiked by nyt. Oh boy. They got visitor logs. George Kent came up.

        Liked by 11 people

        • gda53 says:

          Saw that too.

          Very interesting. That Lee Smith has been in on some excellent stuff recently. And his book was also terrific.

          Liked by 3 people

        • Marlene says:

          Did not see Ingraham, but this is ringing bells. A few weeks back Dan Bongino discussed 3 things that John Solomon had previously reported that witness testimony in the House had confirmed. All regarding Ukraines’ meddling. I transcribed this from the podcast cause I like to be able to go back and refer to things.
          Bongino’s words from John Solomon’s words:
          “There were efforts around Ukraine in 2016 to influence the US election that included a request from a DNC contractor for dirt on Manefort”. Oh yea, that was some meeting!!!
          And that Schiff played the piece of testimony from that woman saying the idea of Ukraine meddling was Russian Propaganda. My ass!!!

          Liked by 3 people

        • guest4ever says:

          Oh, goody, goody!!!

          Like

  3. allhail2 says:

    Leveraging impeachment for a difference in foreign policy outlook?
    What the…?
    Sounds like, we will make this all go away as long as you don’t out us and we can keep our grift.

    The answer is “HELL NO!!!” You Dems set this rickety ship out to sea without a life raft. I don’t know how far and deep the bottom is, but I do know it’s all the way down. Get your affairs in order and accept your fate you crooked m-fs.
    And, have a nice day.

    Liked by 31 people

  4. Linda K. says:

    Schiff is on now showing tapes of Trump talking about Giuliani returning from Ukraine with evidence of corruption. What is wrong with that?

    Liked by 6 people

  5. Zydeco says:

    Laura Ingraham has obtained emails that indicate Obama knew about Biden and Burisma.

    Liked by 12 people

  6. John Post says:

    BB: Rate these Senators, 1 to 10, on how unreliable they are.
    JS: no answer (because that would be STUPID)
    BB: well I will answer for you (so that the enemedia has some talking points in the morning).

    Brett B is a snake in the grass!

    Liked by 8 people

  7. I hope PDJT’s team is direct – right to the point – as brief as necessary – forceful and respectful to the Senate and not use all their allotted time…..telling the Senators using all the time is not necessary or required when telling facts – only when fabricating them.

    But then again, I doubt they’ll be calling me for my advice.

    Liked by 6 people

    • JohnCasper says:

      If all else fails, hit it [them] with a hammer.
      – Murphy

      Liked by 1 person

    • ILOT says:

      HH,
      I think you are on track IMO. When the prosecution has made your defense for you, present it just that way and end the discussion. Defending the ridiculous charges adds credence to them and supports the process. If I could wager, I’d guess the defense uses between 5-7 hours. Much more than that is redundant. The prosecution as near as I can tell started the rinse and repeat cycle after hour 7.

      Liked by 2 people

      • beach lover says:

        And if they continue to repeat and repeat for another 16 hours.. they will lose every Senator. If they are getting up and walking around like reported.. and going home like Feinstein did… good luck.

        Liked by 1 person

  8. JohnCasper says:

    The current status is that the democrats still believe the end justifies the means, which was also what Mao, Stalin and Hitler belied..

    This is nothing less than the totalitarian philosophy that the end justifies the means…. If ever there was a philosophy of government totally at war with that of the Founding Fathers, this is it.
    – Barry Goldwater

    Liked by 2 people

  9. Hans says:

    At the conclusion of today’s impeachment hearing, Schiff calls for witnesses and additional information…He calls out the whistleblower and talks about bravery… I’ll bet he dumps a load if the whistleblower is forced to testify. I believe that he thinks that if the Rinos vote for opening up witnesses he can controll the processes.
    He might be opening up the process to effectively drain the swamp.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Mr e-man says:

      You just noted the R Senators out for calling witnesses. The can tell their constituents, they were all for calling witnesses but not if witnesses such as whistleleaker, Schiff, Hunter etc are not called. Dems didn’t agree to that so no witnesses will be called. Dems fault.

      Like

  10. GB Bari says:

    So Jay said that Nadler said on the Senate floor: “…Executive privilege and other nonsense..”

    Whoops, there it is!

    We’ve know for a long time the DemonRATs consider the US Constitution to be an irritating restraint; an obstruction of DemonRAT’s goals to declare totalitarian power over the nation. So Nadler confirms that by publicly stating that Constitutional principles such as Executive privilege are “nonsense.”

    That ought to be the Game, Set, and Match right there.

    Liked by 11 people

  11. MAGADJT says:

    So what’s this about Louisiana Senator Kennedy saying that Senators have busy jobs and he dosen’t think they were aware of all the details of points made in the house inquisition and that, he was learning some things he didn’t know before. Please tell me they aren’t stupid enough to believe anything that comes out of Schiff or Nadler’s mouths.

    Liked by 8 people

    • Bill Durham says:

      Saw the same thing. Wtf is that redneck thinking? Schiff shows a few out of context clips and Kennedy gets squishy. The dumb hillbilly better get his mind right.

      Liked by 3 people

    • mopar2016 says:

      Sounds like a true Kennedy.

      Like

    • sunnyflower5 says:

      That’s a load of crap coming from Senator Kennedy.
      ….Bless his heart.

      Like

    • beach lover says:

      Who says he believes them? Learning new things could be that Schiff was even more slimy than he thought! Dont underestimate Kennedy’s demeanor.

      He has to act like he is paying attention and will vote with knowledge not emotion. That’s what they pledged to do, whether they actually do it or not, is immaterial. You know every Senator has made up their minds on this.

      Liked by 2 people

    • antiqueiron says:

      That comment of his can be taken in two ways. Kennedy has been known to use sarcasm often. He may have meant that he has learned that schiff is even slimier than he thought. Remember, they are not allowed to openly disparage another member of the club, as they are “gentlemen.” (Oh man, it took a lot for me to type that “gentleman” thing without barfing.) He’s not getting squishy.

      Liked by 2 people

  12. Cowboy79 says:

    I must be missing something. Help me out.

    The Executive sets Policy.

    Not the House, Not the Senate. Not Dept of State, Not FBI, Not CIA, Not NSA, Not Committees.
    House and Senate may vote on specific Funding or Treaties, but not Policy.

    Unless I’m totally mistaken, the House is attempting to pre-empt the authority of the Executive and make the Executive subservient to the House. That’s Unconstitutional in the extreme.

    Methinks the House / Senate need to understand their Constitutional limitations and stay within them. The Constitution divided the powers of Govt. The Constitution did not grant the House any Policy making authority. If they don’t like that, each member is allowed to run for the Office of the President and seek to Make Policy.

    Other than that, they can go pound sand.

    Liked by 2 people

    • beach lover says:

      Saw a list on Twitter, I believe, of all the money Obama withheld from all the countries.. including Ukraine. Another quick response for the defense that speaks volumes.

      Liked by 1 person

  13. rjones99 says:

    Oh BS. This isnt about fp differences. Why the hell is the president’s lawyer trying to civil to heathens. He should be telling them to FO.

    Liked by 1 person

  14. rjones99 says:

    Oh BS. This isnt about fp differences. Why the hell is the president’s lawyer trying to civil to heathens. He should be telling them to FO.

    Like

    • antiqueiron says:

      Just wait. That’s coming, only in lawyer talk. And schiff won’t even realize it until later. After he’s lost & the left are crying in their pelosi wine for two months. Nanzi will be drunkenly telling anyone who will still listen that “I told you sho…knew it wash a bad idea allll alomg, hic-up” In the meantime, the Trump team will high five for a minute, go get some rest and be back at work doing MAGA stuff the next morning. As usual. And we, will be wondering what we were all worried about.

      Like

  15. evergreen says:

    If a group of second graders held a conference on the theory of relativity, it would possess more utility than the senate trial.

    Like

  16. MAGADJT says:

    Everyone – media and Senators included – are talking about the dems use of audio-visual like it was David Copperfield making the Empire State Building disappear. Have they never seen a video before? So embarrassing.

    If that’s what floats their boats, then the Trump team needs to play back video of Schiff’s claims during his argument, and then play video of the person that Schiff was misrepresenting. There are at least four examples of that, such as the Mick Mulvaney comment.

    Liked by 1 person

  17. mopar2016 says:

    Our president will handle it. He always does.

    Liked by 4 people

  18. Sentient says:

    As far as the supposed need for witnesses – Collins and Gardner arguably might have a political need to vote for witnesses. Maybe Murkowski, too. Lamar Alexander is retiring and Romney’s seat is safe, so those guys should refrain being A-holes for once in their lousy lives and be team players.

    Like

  19. SR says:

    How come no one did a research or find something about Schiff? He is so corrupt and liar and nothing to see in his background?

    Liked by 1 person

  20. MAGADJT says:

    Just a game to these people.

    Like

  21. Sammy Hains says:

    Is it just me, or does Bret Baier look an awful lot like Curious George?

    Like

  22. davidberetta says:

    Fat Bastard (Nadler), and Pencil Neck (Schiff), are both a National Disgrace. Both of these animals should be deported. Just like we do terrorist and criminal swaps with other Nations…these two malcontent traitors should be in that same mix. Get them OUT of the USA and we will can then deport the remaining traitors to the USA.

    These Democrat Politicians ARE the most Dangerous Threat to the US Citizenry. More than anything else on the planet.

    Liked by 1 person

  23. mike diamond says:

    Jay,and the all Americans! The Trump Team is right on ! Jay,is right on I’m very glad he is on the team!

    Liked by 1 person

  24. pucecatt says:

    I have a question. If President Trumps legal team has , let’s say a email or something that exonerates the President about this whole process being a set up are the required to share that prior to their opening statements ? If they had something like that could they just spring it ? Seems like the Dems keep adding new so called evidence .

    Liked by 1 person

    • beach lover says:

      Will see if anyone has the answer. I would bet they cant enter any evidence that is not voted on first.. thats part of the issue. And why the Dems in the house had only stuff from one side. They have a lot of material from those weeks of testimony. Not sure if any of it is “new”. Probably stuff they had… going in the weeds and not put out in the public.

      Liked by 1 person

  25. gda53 says:

    Good to hear that PDJT’s team will also be using audio-visual clips and aids to rip the Dem’s impeachment articles into shreds.

    Like

  26. Roddy Pine says:

    So it has begun – what is next – 3 days of Democrats presenting their case? or today (Wednesday counts as the first day) ?

    Like

    • pucecatt says:

      Dems wrap up on Friday , POTUS team starts Saturday . Then 16 hours of questions from senators , after that they vote to call witnesses .

      Like

  27. T2020 says:

    “Video unavailable.” Oh well.

    Like

  28. beach lover says:

    The Dems are going to be down to reading the phone book to drag this out till Friday late. They want the WH lawyers to have to start their side on a Saturday when they think people arent paying attention.

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s