House Scheme Unfolds – Adam Schiff Transmits “New Evidence” to Nadler…

Yesterday’s ridiculous, albeit proactive, New York Times narrative about Russians hacking Burisma now makes sense.  Today the Lawfare team (Mary McCord et al) within Adam Schiff’s impeachment crew send additional files of evidence (pdf below) to be included in the impeachment articles constructed by HJC Chairman Jerry Nadler.

It is all coordinated. The “new evidence” relates to information turned over by Lev Parnas, an SDNY indicted former associate of Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani.  The Lawfare purpose is to bolster their premise that President Trump was trying to force Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate Joe Biden’s corrupt activity around the Ukrainian company Burisma.

The Lawfare crew behind Schiff waited until the last minute to push the new “evidence” because they didn’t want republicans to deconstruct it during the impeachment evidence gathering phase. Aditionally, the Lawfare crew anticipate a Trump impeachment defense surrounding actual evidence of the Biden corruption, which makes the Trump request to Zelensky valid.

So the proactive democrat strategy was/is to use the New York Times presentation of Russia hacking Burisma to negate the provenance of the evidence against the Bidens.  In essence, to cast doubt upon any documents that would show Joe and Hunter Biden participating in an actual influence and money-laundering scheme.

Here’s the letter and documentary evidence from Adam Schiff (House Link Here):

.

The SDNY created legal leverage upon Lev Parnas using the familiar strategy of charging “FARA violations”, as noted in the background of the House explanation.

The purpose was/is to extract anything from Parnas that could be twisted or construed to show evidence that Rudy Giuliani was working on behalf of President Trump to pressure Ukraine into investigating Burisma, Joe Biden and Hunter Biden.

To counter any evidence that would highlight the truth that Hunter and Joe Biden were indeed participating in a pay-to-play influence and money laundering scheme for personal financial benefit, the same democrat operatives created a 2020 Russian ‘hacking claim’ using former Crowdstrike employee Blake Darché and his colleague Oren Falkowitz.

NYT – […] The hackers fooled some of them into handing over their login credentials, and managed to get inside one of Burisma’s servers, Area 1 said.

“The attacks were successful,” said Oren Falkowitz, a co-founder of Area 1, who previously served at the National Security Agency. Mr. Falkowitz’s firm maintains a network of sensors on web servers around the globe — many known to be used by state-sponsored hackers — which gives the firm a front-row seat to phishing attacks, and allows them to block attacks on their customers. (link)

Blake Darche’ and Oren Falkowitz formed a new cyber-security company named “Area-1 Security”.  It is analysis from this group that the New York Times uses to push the Russia hacking of Burisma narrative.  It’s all the same players, just switching around the subject.

  • The 2016 Lawfare group is now 2020’s Just Security;
  • the 2016 CrowdStrike group is now 2020’s Area-1 Security;
  • and the 2016 Russia DNC hack is now the 2020 Russia Burisma hack… 

It’s the same players, the same story, the same approach.

Go deep on Oleg Falkowitz and Oren Falkowitz HERE

In February 2008, Oleg Falkowitz was hired as the Iran Mission Manager and Special Assistant For Policy and Cybersecurity at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

In February 2009, Oleg Falkowitz left his position at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

In August 2010, Oleg Falkowitz was hired as Director of Technology and Data Science Program (J2 — Intelligence) at the United States Cyber Command.

In July 2012, Oleg Falkowitz left his position at both the United States Cyber Command and the National Security Agency.

The same month, Oren Falkowitz co-founded the organisation sqrrl and became the Chief Executive Officer.

In January 2013, Falkowitz left his position at sqrrl.

In November 2013, Oren Falkowitz, Blake Darché and Phil Syme founded the organisation Area 1 Security.

Blake Darché published the article “Once a Target, Always a Target” in Medium, which was about “Cozy Bear”.

Between July 17–19, 2017, Oren Falkowitz, John Brennan, Andrea Mitchell and David Sanger attended the Fortune Brainstorm Tech Conference in Aspen, CO.

LINK to Background

 

This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, CIA, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Election 2020, Fabian Socialists - Modern Progressives, Impeachment, Joe Biden, Just Security, Lawfare, Legislation, media bias, Nancy Pelosi, Notorious Liars, Occupy Type Moonbats, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Russia, Spygate, Spying, Tripwires, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

320 Responses to House Scheme Unfolds – Adam Schiff Transmits “New Evidence” to Nadler…

  1. kris2025 says:

    Democrats 100 Republicans 0

    “Handwritten notes” Yeah right.

    Democrats steamrolling Republicans.

    And NeverTrumper Republicans in Senate have their excuse to run the show in any way they like.

    Liked by 6 people

    • freepetta says:

      So pathetic!! This is a total kangaroo court!!

      Liked by 1 person

      • hocuspocus13 says:

        Even their supporters are laughing at them over this one…

        Liked by 3 people

        • Bill Durham says:

          Does Trump look worried? Nope. Does Rudy look worried? Nope.
          CIA FBI and doj couldn’t get him!
          Lawfare? Seriously? What’s their record against Trump? Mitch will ride Trump coat tails for another term. He ain’t taking on the champ.

          Liked by 5 people

      • Bill Durham says:

        Guys, stop the fear porn. None of Lawfare schemes have worked. Trump beat them at every turn. If they really had him, would they being doing this now? If the Senate was rigged, would they need these hail Mary passes? If there was a Senate coup, is this is all they have? Is this a confident move or desperation? Please. It’s transparently bad. Read Ben wittes latest article, it’s over. If you had the goods, do you do a midnight documents dump? Nope. Trump and Mitch made a deal long ago. A coup is not in the cards. Collins and Gardner and murkowdki are posturing. Mitch controls them. They have to appear to be open minded. The votes were counted and secured long ago. Trump ain’t going into this blind folks.

        Liked by 17 people

    • Green Bucket says:

      They will do ANYTHING to take President Trump down. We cannot let them get away with it!!

      Please everyone, light up the phones in DC over the next few days to let them know we are paying attention and we expect the republicans to support our President!

      If not, here is advance notice that we are taking names (Romney, Lee, Collins, Murkowski, Thune, Blunt, Burr, Gaetz and yes, even McConnell etc.) and we will work to ensure you are never elected again!

      Liked by 5 people

    • justlizzyp says:

      Handwritten notes from a guy who has previously telegraphed his willingness to say and do whatever he needs to for anybody that can help him out with his legal troubles.

      Liked by 5 people

    • The Demon Slick says:

      Too clever by half. They will fail. Eric Ciaramella hardest hit.

      Liked by 2 people

      • ms doodlebug says:

        Democrats will have to call at least some of their ‘star’ witnesses to testify again before the Senate. President Trump’s attorneys can impeach their witnesses pretty quickly. And just because House democrats consider hearsay, opinions, and presumptions as evidence doesn’t mean the Senate will consider any of it to be evidence.

        Like

    • Shyster says:

      Yeah, handwritten notes creation date cannot be determined like audio or computer entries.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Garavaglia says:

      uniparty 100

      Like

    • sharon goodson says:

      Trump can still be ousted – to believe otherwise is naive’. Get you program! You can’t know who the players are without your program! Romney, Collins, Flake, Murkowski and the game is over – Trump is convicted.

      Like

      • Somebody says:

        Sharon #1 Flake is no longer in the senate. #2 it would take more than the three you listed that are still senators to convict. It takes 67 votes, if the 3 you listed vote to convict that would make the count 50/50.

        I’m not saying it’s impossible, but a conviction is a long shot and it certainly takes more than a couple of weak rinos.

        Liked by 1 person

        • dd_sc says:

          But that may be the next s* they throw at the wall to see if it sticks. The vote will be 55-45 to convict – RINOs not up for re-election in 2020 will be allowed to vote to convict.

          Democrats can say there is bipartisan support for removal, but Trump remains in office on a “technicality” – that pesky US Constitution again. GOPe can tell Trump he’s lost support. The goal has always been to get him to resign.

          Extremely desperate and risky move. 20-something Republicans up for re-election in 2020. If the backlash against the impeachment vote result in Democrats flipping 13-15 seats (the I’s caucus with the Dems) McConnell could be minority leader of 40 or fewer Republicans. Schumer wouldn’t have to talk to him or return his calls.

          Like

          • Linda K. says:

            Nice try dd. They will be lucky to get 47 in favor, if you think of the dems in Red States up for reelection. Any Republican who votes to impeach will not be reelected.

            Liked by 2 people

        • ms doodlebug says:

          Democrat senators who are running for President should recuse themselves from voting in the impeachment trial as they clearly have something to gain by a conviction of President Trump.

          Like

      • littleanniefannie says:

        Nope—it takes 67, not a simple majority. The Constitution matters. The House can vote in their rules to make their hearings a sham but they cannot overrule the Constitution!

        Like

      • Linda K. says:

        4 is not enough. the dimms need 67 and they only have 47.

        Like

        • I believe it is 2/3rds of those PRESENT. Cowards may not show up.

          Liked by 3 people

          • GB Bari says:

            H&HC is CORRECT, per Article 1 Section 3 the US Constitution.

            “The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

            In other words, conviction does NOT require 67 votes unless all 100 Senators are present (VP does not count in impeachment trials).

            HOWEVER, I do not know if current Republican Senate rules stipulate that all 100 Senators must attend and vote. If not, Republican Senators who decide to not attend increase the chance that the president is convicted.

            Despite this, I personally am not worried about this president being convicted. Not in this trial.

            I am more concerned about the massive COVERUP of DoJ, FBI, State Department, and Congressional criminality and corruption in attempting to overturn the 2016 election via fabricated evidence and corrupt IC officials, agents, lawyers, and judges (espec. FISC). I am concerned that AG Barr appears to be overwhelmed by and thus uninterested in effectively fighting the rampant blatant corruption in these agencies and elsewhere throughout the federal government.

            Liked by 1 person

  2. Shyster says:

    Wash, rinse repeat. Here we go again, strap in!

    Liked by 2 people

  3. FofBW says:

    STAND!

    Liked by 5 people

  4. Dekester says:

    Crazy stuff…The U.S. is truly at a crossroads here.

    There are many nefarious players, but few more so than Paul “ the rat” Ryan.

    What’s next?

    Liked by 1 person

  5. kleen says:

    Go after Soros. Get him to testify.

    Liked by 2 people

  6. Reserved55 says:

    Where are the Burisma servers?

    Did they leave with the rest of Ukrainian servers when Poroshenko was ousted by Zelensky?

    Liked by 1 person

  7. jx says:

    And to think, Republicans could have shut this down and didn’t.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Garavaglia says:

      whodathunkit?

      Liked by 1 person

    • thedoc00 says:

      It takes leadership that does not exist in the Republican Party. This is the unreported secret to President Trump’s success at being elected President. He is not a republican nor democrat. He saw a vast leadership void and lack of balls in the Republican Party who’s constituency and objectives more closely align with his own than the democrat party’s. Plus, he would never have been able to overcome the Democrat Party puppet masters as he did the weak (actually non-existent) Republican Party puppet masters.

      McConnell does not have control of the senate and he is nearly as feckless as Boehner was running the House. Its all about sustaining position.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Jederman says:

      I think PT deserve a chance to clear his name and in the process destroy schitt, nadler, lawfare… . I’m more than happy to see a blood bath. The dem house bs was railroaded through.

      Their bs “peachment” needs to be ground into dust on national TV. Let the cards fall where they may.

      Liked by 1 person

    • dd_sc says:

      Ryan and his herd of RINOs enabled it when he didn’t vacate the Speaker’s Chair and 40-some House Republicans resigned in a critical election year.

      Liked by 1 person

  8. dottygal says:

    If only they spent this much time and energy and effort to something good for this country. God, I hate these people! They are like bullies that never give up.

    Liked by 8 people

  9. deepdivemaga says:

    Sickening. Truly sickening.

    Liked by 2 people

  10. Lion2017 says:

    This COUP needs to stop!

    Liked by 3 people

  11. LouisianaTeaRose says:

    Fox just covered this, and showed a couple of bites….including Senator Burr as he ran away from the cameras, but briefly responded to a reporters’ question, saying about the so-called-new-Russian-hacking “….they never stopped” spying….

    ….there is only ONE way to stop this.

    TRUMP 2020.

    Liked by 9 people

  12. islandpalmtrees says:

    Sundance writes: The 2016 CrowdStrike group is now 2020’s Area-1 Security.

    CrowdStrike and “Area 1 Security”. have NSA people working for them. “Area 1 Security” founded 2013, CrowdStrike founded 2011.

    Blake Darché started his career at the National Security Agency in the field of Computer Network Operations. Since then, Blake has worked for CrowdStrike as an Incident Response Lead and has co-founded Area 1 Security, an anti-phishing company focused on stopping phishing attacks comprehensively and preemptively.

    “Antivirus is the ultimate back door,” Blake Darché, a former N.S.A. operator and co-founder of Area 1 Security. “It provides consistent, reliable and remote access that can be used for any purpose, from launching a destructive attack to conducting espionage on thousands or even millions of users.”

    Oren Falkowitz, a former NSA official and the chief executive of the cyberdefense firm Area 1 Security, said WikiLeaks, run by Julian Assange, had again succeeded in disrupting the status quo, as it did during last year’s presidential election with the release of e-mails from the Democratic National Committee. “If you understand the Assange playbook,” Falkowitz said, “a lot of it is just to create chaos.”

    The October 26, 2016 Notice informed the Court that NSA analysts had been conducting such queries in violation of that prohibition, with much greater frequency than had previously been disclosed to the Court.

    Liked by 3 people

  13. Chiggerbug says:

    We’re totally FUBAR.

    Liked by 1 person

  14. donnyvee says:

    It’s difficult, but I’m an optimist by nature. One thing that keeps me going is looking at all the crap that the left has spewed at our POTUS and yet they have not brought him down. I keep praying for a just result but I do worry about how much DT can take. Has any leader in the history of the world been so tested?

    Liked by 5 people

  15. CNN_sucks says:

    Good thing that Burisma server hacked is now with Putin. We are going to settle this now once and for all. s/

    Like

  16. Bucknutguy says:

    Where’s our Crowdstrike?

    Liked by 3 people

  17. gda53 says:

    Desperate tactics doomed to fail. These Lawfare loons are nothing if not persistent, like an angry deerfly on your cottage dock who just won’t take the hint and go away until you smush it.

    Nancy took advice from a deerfly, and now that things have gone all “pear-shaped” she’s reduced to spreading the Russia Russia nonsense anew. It’s Mitch who’s in league with Putin now, apparently. Under direction of PDJT presumably.

    These folk have been digging in on defence for 3 years. Their arms must be exhausted from backfilling to hide their multiple culpabilities and clearly the brains of their erstwhile leaders are now totally fried.

    Anyone REALLY fancy their chances at this stage? Because they’ve been SO successful in moving the needle on public opinion so far.

    Liked by 4 people

    • sharon goodson says:

      Public opinion does not matter. They will sacrifice everything to stop Trump and his movement. EVERYTHING. Polls do not matter. Trump rallies do not matter. The only thing that matters is our defeat. They will figure out the rest after they win.

      Liked by 4 people

      • DebbieSemms says:

        They will try everything but still lose.

        Liked by 4 people

      • gda53 says:

        That’s a ridiculous statement.

        If public opinion does not matter, why then were they trying their level best to affect public opinion by running constant focus groups on how to impeach?

        They are completely controlled by the polls and they are now thrashing around wildly because the damn polls just will not cooperate with the intricate, ridiculous schemes that Lawfare keeps running out for them to follow blindly.

        How stupid is that?

        In fact, are we sure that we don’t have some moles within that very Lawfare Clown Car?

        Keep doing what you’re doing Dems. Do keep throwing us in that there briar patch.

        Liked by 4 people

        • I agree gda53, public opinion matters greatly and that is why the left has spent so much on the msm.

          They have spent billions and billions of dollars trying to influence the public and to make all of us believe that Donald Trump is a very bad man that needs to be removed from office.

          And they have not been able to change the polls one little bit.

          Yes, public opinion and polls matter very much to the Democrats.

          Liked by 2 people

      • littleanniefannie says:

        Barr needs to get off his a$$ and start releasing declassified documents with explanations.

        Liked by 4 people

      • GB Bari says:

        ROLCON alert.
        (Fear Porn spreader)

        Liked by 1 person

        • dawg says:

          As far as identifying a ROLCON, it doesnt seem likely to me that a ROLCON would be spreading opinions that would have the effect of putting “Us” more on guard. Spreading fear porn would have the effect of engaging more people. Seems like the opposite of what they would be trying to do.

          It would seem to me that ROLCONs would be saying things like “Trumps got this”, ad nauseum. False sense of security, lulling us to sleep, etc, etc….

          Kinda like Q, for example.

          Just my 2 cents

          Liked by 1 person

  18. justlizzyp says:

    Good thing Joe and Hunter did nothing wrong, as we have been assured by them, the media and every Democrat and Never Trump politician. So we know for super sure that anything bad is a hoax- remember all the talk of deep fakes, too?

    Liked by 2 people

  19. beach lover says:

    Does anyone else wonder why the Dems are continuing this charade when all it can do is incriminate Biden ? If I didn’t know better I’d think they were trying to get rid of him to make room for someone else.

    Like

  20. Bogeyfree says:

    The RINOS needed more in order to protect their hides and provide cover so they could vote to oust PT, so here we go 11th hour additions.

    More fabrication of a fraud on a sitting President and our DOJ hasn’t even begun to look into Ukraine.

    I wonder why?

    My guess is this BS will be enough for the 20 RINOS to say they had to go with the “evidence” and no one is above the law (regardless if it is fabricated)

    Get ready, trust the plan lovers, PT is about to be ousted by the greatest corrupt coup the world has ever seen and I repeat……..

    All of this could have been stopped and exposed as a fraud but the people who could have done so chose not to.

    ALWAYS REMEMBER THIS,

    Like

    • Garavaglia says:

      Agreed. But..are you so convinced this “court” has the final say in anything? We have the final say my friend..no matter what nonsense they pull. Be prepared.

      Like

      • Bogeyfree says:

        Once PT is gone the left rules unless the patriots of this country replicate what our forefathers did.

        Evil and tyranny must not be allowed to thrive. Our forefathers didn’t allow it and we must not either IMO.

        Liked by 2 people

        • icthematrix says:

          With all due respect, do we all recognize what level of opposition would be required for us to stand up against the power of our government run by leftists…in control of the military? Our revolt to gain our freedom from the Brits was amazing, astounding. But, the rulers were a foreign body far from home. If the evil cabal gets rid of our President, who in power will stand against them? The Uniparty will rejoin their natural place as the “opposition in name only” while denouncing any protests or violence as “radicals” and “terrorists”. Massive force will be used to quell such uprisings, with the help of the propaganda media to impart the collective mantra.

          Frankly the best defense in all this crap is a great offense. It’s time for our President to lay bare this treasonous brood for the evil plotters they are. It will not happen in the Senate trial as I doubt Turtle gives him the full chance to call witnesses.

          Like

    • DebbieSemms says:

      I don’t think there is 20 Republicans willing to give up there political careers I think your crazy.

      Liked by 3 people

      • DebbieSemms says:

        Typo – “you’re”

        Like

      • dd_sc says:

        May not need 20.

        If 6-10 Uniparty RINOs vote to convict, Democrats and GOPe can say there is bipartisan support to remove President Trump, but he remains president on a “technicality”. GOPe and donors will try and get Trump to resign – the political equivalent of the Board removing a CEO.

        Risky move for Republicans, but the Uniparty may be willing to go scorched earth.

        Like

    • Diana Allocco says:

      “PT is about to be ousted”

      Everything else this bunch has tried, all their oh-so-clever schemes, every genius plot, has utterly failed. Yet people still go into “woe-is-me” mode at the drop of a hat.

      Beyond tiresome.

      Liked by 4 people

      • steph_gray says:

        I continue to believe firmly that there are plenty of visitors to CTH who are paid (probably only in cocoa and plaid pjs) to hang out at CTH and woe-is-me all day long just to worry us.

        Like

      • GB Bari says:

        Agree.

        These appear to be ROLCONs trying to spread Fear Porn.
        I went back and read almost every post they make recently. It’s never or hardly ever positive – nothing but “the worst scenario will happen and we’re all gonna die.”

        Liked by 1 person

        • willthesuevi says:

          Either ROLCON’s or it could be, they have the dreaded Munchausen by Comment Board disease.

          Many people realize they can get attention being professional victims. Once started it is addictive. The disease carries over to all aspects of their lives. These folks need drama to get through the day.

          I am only partly joking.

          Like

    • dawg says:

      I agree with everything you are saying, I have been saying it since before the House passed the articles, EXCEPT the part about there ultimately being 20 R Senators to vote to convict.

      This is where Sundance’s description of McConnell’s preference for being MINORITY Leader comes in.

      Mitch is gonna sell the votes to Pres Trump to acquit. It defies all logic to think that Mitch would NOT do this.

      Word is there are not 51 votes to dismiss. And the subject of whether or not to call witnesses still has not been voted on.

      Only THEN will we get to the point of WHICH witnesses get called.

      There are so many opportunities for Mitch here that there is NO WAY he wont take advantage of them. He is going to sell every little thing along the way for as much as possible.

      Its why he is insisting on taking everything step by step.

      Like

    • Krashman Von Stinkputin says:

      All of this could have been stopped and exposed as a fraud but the people who could have done so chose not to.

      Guess Donald’s just tired of the job and that’s the reason he chose not to expose it.

      Like

  21. dustahll says:

    Looks like a grade school tactic, D.C. is so corrupt, will they dig their own graves, Probably, dumb is dumb

    Liked by 2 people

  22. Ellis says:

    So what?

    The president still hasn’t committed a crime and it’s too late to defend Biden.

    Liked by 1 person

  23. mr.piddles says:

    So I just read every one of Schiff’s bullet points. So this is his “evidence” from Lev Parnas’ cell phone? This ties it all together?

    Everything I read is either public knowledge, or can be reasonably surmised from public knowledge. It’s a desperate attempt to throw out more innuendo to make WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW seem more nefarious THAN WE ALREADY KNOW IT NOT TO BE.

    Look at this nonsense…

    “The evidence you are receiving today shows:
    […]
    In January of 2019, Mr. Parnas and Mr. Giuliani exchanged text messages about securing a visa for former Ukrainian Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin. When Mr. Parnas advised that the United States had denied Mr. Shokin’s visa, Mr. Giuliani responded “I can revive it.”

    Mr. Giuliani later revealed, “It’s going to work I have no 1 in it.” He also gave Jay Sekulow, President Trump’s personal attorney, Mr. Parnas’ phone number.”

    Ummmmmmmmmm….. SO WHAT?!?!? The denied visas…. aaaannnd?!?!?! WHAT ABOUT the denied visas, Schiff???? Giuliani was pushing for them, and they were denied??? Oh my!!! this would be a BOMBSHELL if we didn’t already know it!!!!

    More nonsense from Team Moron…

    “Mr. Parnas’ communications with Mr. Lutsenko included frequent reference to Ambassador Yovanovitch, often in deeply offensive terms.”

    OOOHHHHHHH NNNOOOOOOOOOO!!!!! NOT “DEEPLY OFFENSIVE TERMS”!!!! **ANYTHING** BUT “DEEPLY OFFENSIVE TERMS”!!!!!!

    Seriously. This moron, Schiff, and his Moron Crew mention Yovanovitch like five or six times in those bullet points. Who gives a crap about Marie Yovanovitch???? Who??? Besides her children and her parents???

    Same crap, different document, folks.

    Liked by 4 people

  24. When an espionage involved scenario is fabricated to provide “plausible deniability”, or a “story” is for whatever other purpose needing a plausible “fabrication” …. by definition the fabrication should actually be plausible, and not appear to be transparent propaganda fabricated for deception of the cognitively challenged.

    When it comes to BULLSHIT, Buy only GENUINE. Accept no cheaply manufactured substitutes.

    Liked by 1 person

  25. oldersoul says:

    Too many nervous nellies and eye-ores around here. I’m embarrassed just reading the knee-jerk gloom and doom at times. Sundance is merely calling their next play.

    How have the last six impeachment innings gone? PDJT’s approval numbers have gone UP with every DNC lawfare play. Nancy Pelosi is a private laughingstock in her own caucus. They are getting hammered in the court of public approval.

    Right now, the score is PDJT 15, DNC 0. And PDJT hasn’t even taken the field yet.

    So buck up and stop borrowing trouble. As I detailed a while back, PDJT has already won this battle.

    Liked by 14 people

  26. DebbieSemms says:

    Even if the Russians did hack Burisma (which is bogus) it does NOTHING to make Biden look less guilty. This sounds more like desperation than a sound strategy.

    Liked by 2 people

  27. LouisianaTeaRose says:

    Hey, Sundance….do you know where Ezra Cohen-Watnick is??

    Is he over at DOJ???

    Liked by 1 person

  28. benifranlkin says:

    I don’t see anything new here. Does anyone else? More nonsense. No crime.

    Like

    • mr.piddles says:

      It’s the Cliff Notes for the House Impeachment Inquiry covering the time period November 2019 through December 2019.

      So it’s nice to have it all summarized in one tidy document, if you think about it.

      Liked by 2 people

  29. luke says:

    The Left will obfuscate but fortunately we have a couple very powerful sound bytes courtesy of Joe and Jr. The best thing that can happen here is a quick dismissal and shut the door (for now). But if the left and others really want to go there our side needs to make it clear that this goes all the way to Obama. If Mulvaney, Bolton, etc are forced to testify although Trump has an established Exec. Privilege then Obama’s henchmen (Kerry, Biden, etc) will too.

    That is why I think the Left is simply playing a game of chicken. This is going to be another dog n pony show muddying the water. Something you cannot beat the left at so it is probably not wise to even try. We have a real chance to marginalize the left this November and the person to lead the charge in PDT. We must all do our part whatever that entails and do whatever you can.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Chicken! That is exactly what it is. Perfect description.

      They continue to brazenly blanket the airwaves with their propaganda, secure in the knowledge that it has always worked for them before, and besides, their target audience is palpably gullible. Sundance, Solomon, Herridge and others try and expose the truth … whose voice is louder?

      Liked by 2 people

  30. A2 says:

    Jamie Dupree has a preliminary thread on this move.

    Like

    • snarkybeach says:

      Yovanovitch, the ambassador that requested monitoring on reporters, pundits & American citizens… I am glad she was removed from her post.

      Liked by 6 people

    • islandpalmtrees says:

      See any date? See any notary mark? How about a witnesses?

      Like

      • MaineCoon says:

        Is that McCord’s handwriting?

        Liked by 1 person

      • Wethal says:

        I hope one of the rules in the Senate trial is that the Federal Rules of Evidence apply. Hearsay would be out (Ok, there are exceptions to hearsay, but second and third-hand hearsay would be out.)

        Also rules on the authenticity of documents would apply, including the accuracy of any documents that are not originals. Given how easy it is to or alter documents these days, copies or scans of documents should be kept out unless the writer or custodian of the document can testify to its authenticity.

        Like

    • littleanniefannie says:

      There is zero identification on the Ritz Cracker note. Give me a few minutes. I’ll send some notes about Nazi P, Pencil Neck Schifft, NoNads Nadler, any Lawfare bigots, whatever.
      Get real. This isn’t a SchittShow but it’s close.

      Like

    • joshashland says:

      That undated hand written note on unwrinkled perfect looking hotel note pad was supposedly written and carried halfway around the globe…..when?
      Finding it hard to believe they call hat evidence.

      Like

    • Hans says:

      Interesting…under get Zelensky the “to” is centered like a painting. I don’t know about other people no one normally paints a to in the middle of a line. A normal note would have read “to announce” on the next line. The next line also does not start at the left edge. So I don’t believe this was a note written in the spur of the moment . IMO IT LOOKS LIKE IT WAS WRITTEN SLOWLY EACH WORD THOUGHT OUT….FAKE.

      Like

    • Your Royal Highness says:

      Zelensky isn’t even spelled correctly. Quick someone get Nancy to spell Zelensky!!

      Like

  31. Brian Baker says:

    So the Dems are still playing dirty pool and using DOJ/SDNY as a political bludgeon. Where’s William Barr?

    Liked by 1 person

  32. Bubby says:

    “The SDNY created legal leverage upon Lev Parnas using the familiar strategy of charging “FARA violations”, as noted in the background of the House explanation.” – Sundance

    I’m assuming this was done with AG Barr’s knowledge if not approval? I think the President has entered a new danger zone and like others I fear for his removal. Godspeed President Trump!

    Like

  33. islandpalmtrees says:

    The DNC hires a CIA run company called Crowdstrike to investigate “Russia hacking”. Then they turn to another NSA run company called “Area 1 Security” to backup their claim. One that worked with them to spy on American citizens by performing illegal NSA Database searches.

    I call BS on this one.

    Liked by 3 people

  34. Ronald Robinson says:

    We need to descend on dc! I grew up there, I know they can’t ignore numbers. There needs to be someone who can organize all the groups. Walk away, Rolling Thunder, dems for Trump, Women for Trump, Blexit! One million people has never been done. We shut it down for a day or have to burn it down later.

    Like

    • steph_gray says:

      One million people, at least, was done in the Tea Party march of 2009.

      If PDJT said he wanted it, I’m sure the deplorables could dwarf that.

      Like

  35. DebbieSemms says:

    You would think these arrogant fools would be more concerned with all the US servers hacked by China.

    Liked by 1 person

    • willthesuevi says:

      Agreed.

      I have been concerned for a while the “Russia-Ukraine” debacle is a welcome diversionary sock puppet for the ChiComs.

      Hey everyone, look over here…………..squirrel!!

      Like

  36. Wethal says:

    This could be a foot-in-the-door for more new evidence, such as witnesses, in the Senate. “Look, we added new documents after the House voted on the articles; why not some new witnesses, too?”

    Like

  37. redhotrugmama says:

    DemocRATS=500 Republicans=0

    I don’t trust most of the Republicans. The 64 million dollar question is how may Republican Senators are willing to lose their seat in order to convict PDT. I don’t have a good feeling about this trial.The DemocRATS are organized while the Republicans are not:( How many Dem protesters will show up daily I wonder? I wish we had a Republican organizing some kind of march or something. Prayer is a given, but thousands showing up to march/silent protest might make the Republican Sentaors pause (heavy sigh)

    Oh well………..we shall have our answer in the next few weeks.

    Like

  38. themortgagedude says:

    All Cocaine Mitch needs to do to shut this down is state that impeaching and removing a President would be the most important thing Congress and Senate would do in their lifetimes. As such he will grant President Trump the right to call any and all witnesses he wishes to make his case if the Democrats want witnesses. Then have Guiliani leak a list of who the President plans to call. The Dems don’t want this in any way.

    Like

  39. Wethal says:

    They want to put in enough dirt in the Senate trial to try to flip a few RINO senators, or failing that, using the RINOs votes to acquit, using those votes against them in their re-election campaigns. If they can take the Senate, they can stop Trump from nominating new judges, or a SCOTUS justice, force government shutdowns if he doesn;’ sign their budgets, etc.

    Like

  40. Don McAro says:

    President Trump should demand the 1st witness be the whistleblower… then when it throws Schiff under the bus then call in Schiff… Screw Hunter

    Its time to take out Schiff

    Liked by 5 people

  41. allhail2 says:

    No new evidence, PERIOD.
    The articles were passed with the “evidence” presented in the House. The Senate should flat refuse to even acknowledge the new garbage.

    The concept of run what you brung applies. If the House brought a broken down, rusted out piece of trash to the race, well, then that is all they get to run with. There is no backup motor or parts allowed once you’ve signed up.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Bogeyfree says:

      But they won’t!

      The RINOS will stand high and mighty and profess that we should know all of the evidence.

      It’s is such a fraud but was necessary to provide more “cover” for the RINOS.

      Who on the Republican team outside Rand Paul is DEMANDING that Joe and Hunter Biden testify, that Shifty and Pelosi testify and very few are screaming that even the WB should testify.

      Liked by 1 person

  42. JamesD says:

    We finally know why Pelosi held up the impeachment. She was waiting for a Schiff staffer to fly to Vienna to pick up the stationary.

    Liked by 4 people

  43. littleanniefannie says:

    By what right do they have to change the articles of impeachment that were voted on by the House. Does Nazi P, coupled with her other stooges (Pencil Neck and NoNads) have the ability to unilaterally change the articles?
    These people have no shame. None. Zip. Zero. Nada. Nazi basically admitted late last week that her sole focus as Speaker this time has been to make sure President Trump cannot win election if he hasn’t resigned or been removed before. She kicked it into high gear when Paul Jr’s immoral dealings were brought up by the President. She didn’t necessarily object to the Where’s Hunter campaign but the Mama Bear really came to the front when little Pauly began to draw scrutiny. What she has done (and tell me again about your moral, Catholic upbringing. I promise Nazi, most Catholic Churches will not consider serving you Communion because of your anti-Catholic views (killing babies, etc).
    Your name and moral can only appear in the same sentence when moral is preceded immediately by “im”!!

    Liked by 1 person

    • If the Senate agrees to hear this Bill of Attainder, then the precedent is clearly set that §1.9.3 is not, in fact, an enforced part of the Constitution. The House can, in fact, “pass a Bill of Attainder” and it … since it once was … by precedent must always be … accepted by the Senate.

      During the month of January, the House could pass at least three new Bills based on some new “evidence,” and demand that the Senate must “try” them all. February could bring fifteen new versions; March, thirty. Congress will do nothing else this year except to be dragged-about by Lawfare, Inc.’s puppet strings. By November 2020, our President could have faced impeachment more than 250 times.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Krashman Von Stinkputin says:

      Where are you seeing they are changing the Articles of Impeachment?

      Like

  44. Ellis says:

    So Schiff introduces evidence that confirms the president was investigating corruption by Joe Biden.

    Is this an attempt to take out Biden? These notes further exonerate the president and are simply more innuendo about a non crime.

    Also, in case you haven’t heard, Yovanovitch didn’t like president Trump.

    Like

  45. Same old same old!! I stand with President Trump!!

    Liked by 1 person

  46. Pencil neck sends No Nads some of the garbage he sifted from his basement tapes and phone taps and the surrender monkeys declare removal is a fait accompli…. because omnipotent Lawfare…. Right.

    Like

  47. Merkin Muffley says:

    And now the RINOs can say “OOOOHHHH! This changes things COMPLETELY!!!!” I blame McConnell for letting this Schiff show reach the Senate. Get used to this show. It’s going to run longer than Phantom of the Opera!

    Like

  48. Yet another server, supposedly “hacked.” Yet another source of secret “evidence,” surreptitiously presented to a tribunal but never to opposing attorneys, supposed to be accepted at face value because of the testimony of “experts” who were employed by the known-to-be malicious accusers. “All of this is true. Really. Because we say it is. Trust us.”

    Still no alleged violation of the United States Code. Still nothing for which the accused could face “indictment, trial, conviction and punishment” in any Court. Still a Bill of Attainder and nothing more. Transparently an attempt by corrupt politicians to deflect and to prevent any actual criminal investigation of what they have done – in short, obstruction of justice on their part.

    Still unconstitutional. And right here we see the wisdom of our founders, who were Englishmen and therefore familiar with how impeachment had been abused “over there.” There was a reason why they insisted that impeachment could only be for actual crime. And why they expressly forbade Bills of Attainder at both the Federal and the State level.

    If the Senate is foolish enough to accept this Bill of Attainder and to agree to bring it to trial, both they and our nation will rue that decision forever.

    This is how Constitutional Precedents are made. The Senate now has the opportunity to assert that it has the Constitutional prerogative – matching that of any Court of Law – to refuse to hear a case that is defective; that is Unconstitutional. And to, on its own authority, declare it to be so.

    Maybe our Founders anticipated that one day an unscrupulous group of politically-savvy lawyers would mount a four-year long attack on the foundations of our Constitutional order. But, probably not. Nevertheless, they did entrust their successors, 230 years in the future, with the tools that they would need to counter it … i-f they will.

    Liked by 3 people

  49. hocuspocus13 says:

    DemoKKKrats held the Articles of Impeachment and for nearly 30 days this is the best scheme they could come up with

    The Russians hacked Burisma???

    Like

  50. Bigly says:

    We are all watching this happen, helplessly aware that trump better up his game or this scam might actually work.

    By upping his game Push Barr to fricken act , fire Wray, appoint a special counsel – blow the deep state up!

    Sundance has been sending smoke signals for 3 years – someone DO something! So maddening.

    Ok. Back to my cool.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s