House Republicans Deliver List of Eight Witnesses Requested for Impeachment Inquiry….

Chairman Adam Schiff is leading the impeachment inquiry into President Trump and told republicans they had a deadline of yesterday for any requests for witnesses for the upcoming public hearings.

Schiff has stated he will arbitrarily approve or deny any request from the House republicans.

Today House republicans released a list of eight witnesses they want to see called to testify as part of the impeachment inquiry (full pdf below).  Included in the list is the anonymous CIA “whistleblower”, Hunter Biden, Alexandra Chalupa (DNC operative who met with Ukrainian officials in 2016), and Nellie Ohr who was doing the Fusion-GPS 2016 opposition research using Ukrainian contacts and sources.


The full list includes: Hunter Biden, Devon Archer, Alexandra Chalupa, Tim Morrison, David Hale, Kurt Volker, Nellie Ohr and the “Whistleblower”.  [Direct House pdf Link]

It is unlikely Chairman Adam Schiff would permit the republicans to call Nellie Ohr as a witness because her activity throughout the 2016 election would be too damaging to the current impeachment narrative.  Indeed, questions to Nellie Ohr would likely expose the origin of the Clinton-DNC-Fusion opposition research and manufacturing operation that eventually blended with the DOJ  and FBI.

This entry was posted in Big Government, CIA, Conspiracy ?, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, Election 2016, Election 2020, FBI, IG Report Comey, IG Report FISA Abuse, IG Report McCabe, Impeachment, Joe Biden, Legislation, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Spygate, Spying, THE BIG UGLY. Bookmark the permalink.

207 Responses to House Republicans Deliver List of Eight Witnesses Requested for Impeachment Inquiry….

  1. Boots says:

    Nunes has done good but calling only 9 witnesses seems IMO to telegraph weakness because, well, he should’ve had 20 0r 30 witnesses….or at least had the exact same number as Shiff For Brains and his Satanic minions called.

    Far as I’m concerned, this takeover can be stopped only one of two ways. A hot war. Or Divine Intervention. Prefer the later but ready for the former.

    Liked by 1 person

    • TarsTarkas says:

      Quality, not quantity. You only need one smoking gun to convict, and several of the witnesses have fingerprints all over the Saturday Night Specials, AR-15’s, and tactical nukes they used.

      Liked by 4 people

    • coltlending says:


      Where are the Republicans reminding everyone that years ago when the Democrats got their asses handed to them in a congressional election the Democrats cried they were not given due representation on committees and the Republicans gave it to them!!


    • gigi says:

      Satanic minions. Bingo. They all need to go to their ” ‘ father the devil,’ ” pronto.


    • Mrs. E says:

      The ninth request represents many more than just one. They asked for multiple witnesses in that one. And since Schiff has said they will not allow any of them, I say the president is right not to cooperate, and that I do not want him to cooperate in this farce. They should be brought up on charges for treason, attempting a coup of the US presidency and usurping our Constitution!


  2. jus wundrin says:

    Any rejection of any witnesses by schiffty is obstruction of justice.

    Liked by 9 people

    • Rhoda R says:

      Schiff’s entire kangaroo court is an obstruction of justice; ie the investigation into the Ukraine corruption perpetuated by Biden, Pelosi, etc.

      Liked by 7 people

    • All 9 witness appearances were denied by Schiff immediately upon receipt of the list.

      Witnesses chosen by Republicans numbering ZERO are being allowed appearance.


      • jus wundrin says:

        Nanzi lied.

        This is what fascists do.


      • L4grasshopper says:

        Officially? Already?


        Liked by 1 person

      • ms doodlebug says:

        Might that be what the Republicans wanted him to do? Now PDJT can tell the thousands upon thousands attending his rallies that democrats are refusing to call witnesses requested by Republicans. The media won’t report it but every one attending a rally will be telling anyone and everyone about it – and they, in turn, will be telling others. They will put it on their social media accounts – and others will share to others. Don’t we all trust what people we know tell us more than we trust the media and politicians? Grassroots have a lot of roots…

        Liked by 1 person

    • dallasdan says:

      Not when he is making the rules. This is merely theater to prepare for the House vote on bogus articles of impeachment and the show trial in the Senate.

      I don’t see this train being derailed in the House, and the outcome of the Senate trial is very questionable, IMO.

      Liked by 1 person

    • aarmad says:

      Yes,…….but why aren’t the Republicans suing him or being more vocal about this. Or am I missing something? Not allowing the Republicans to call witnesses they want is just preposterous! How can there be an impeachment without equal fairness? They might just as well vote again for impeachment now because it appears they will impeach regardless!

      Liked by 1 person

      • redthunder238 says:

        It seems you’re missing the fact that most of these “Republicans” are actually Uniparty and have no intention of helping POTUS. Trump is threatening their gravy train. It’s all about the $$$$$.

        Liked by 1 person

      • dallasdan says:

        “…it appears they will impeach regardless!”

        Yes, it does. The objective of the House Dems has long been known to be forcing a trial in the Senate to, at best for them, remove the President, or, at the least, smear and defame him prior to the election in 2020.

        Fairness was long ago a fatal casualty of this monstrous process that progresses each day.


  3. Even without the GOP witnesses, no way in hell are Schiff & Co. going to pull this off without Republicans – some way, some how – getting it on the record that the testimony elicited by these democrats is 1) Hearsay 2) Opinion 3) Does not agree with the actual call transcript 4) Describes actions fully within the power, duties and obligations of the President and is generally a bunch of innocuous window-dressing surrounding an event which isn’t even remotely inappropriate, much less impeachable in the first place.

    These clowns have already demonstrated they’re not as smart as they think they are and the viewers aren’t as dumb as their voter base.

    This, in combination with what I anticipate will be nasty, rude, injudicious and blatantly unfair behaviors by democrats attempting to shut down any semblance of balance, is going to turn this into a boomeranging fuster cluck that’s going to backfire on them worse than Michael Cohen, John Dean or the Mueller debacle.

    Liked by 1 person

    • oldumb says:

      Sure they are clowns, but they are smarter than you give them credit for. They have held onto power this long with a losing hand. They are very successful at making hay out of thin air. They would have won by now, except for 1 VSG. That is the issue. You kid yourself think any of them stupid, they aren’t. they are criminal masterminds that would have gotten away with it and have for decades.

      Liked by 6 people

      • ann says:

        Agree. Never underestimate the enemy.

        Liked by 5 people

      • ms doodlebug says:

        They have gotten away with it because no one has questioned their actions and motives. IMO, they’ve made a fatal mistake with the impeachment push. That’s because the least informed people in our country know impeachment is a big deal. Just as happened with Bill Clinton, they start paying attention – and they know bs when they see it. Democrats have put themselves under a magnifying glass.

        Liked by 3 people

        • Joemama says:

          They have gotten away with it because they control the MSM. The internet is slowly changing that.

          Wasn’t there a Shakespeare play that had a line like:

          “First we kill the banking families and then we kill the lawyers … “

          Liked by 2 people

          • ms doodlebug says:

            lol The lawyers, but the banking families? If only we could figure out a non-criminal way

            Roughly 40% of eligible voters don’t vote. Of those who do, we might be surprised how many are one issue voters. Like those who won’t vote for a pro-life candidate because women who can’t control their bodies long enough to pop a pill or insist on a condom have a right to control their own bodies. The economy? Veterans’ access to medical care? Illegals crossing the border? Drugs? Human trafficking? pfff pfff

            We need a way to make politics fun, sexy, exciting…


          • redthunder238 says:

            I’m not sure where you got the idea that “The internet is slowly changing that”. Sites like this are starting to be shut down, people are getting banned from commenting, banned from even signing up to comment in some cases. Sites like FB and Twitter are shadow banning Patriots and limiting how many people see the posts that don’t get banned outright. Google is constantly scrubbing anything that hurts the Dem’s. Remember, 99% of the people in Tech are members of “The Resistance”. This Country is in serious trouble. The Leftists are completely out of control.


        • oldumb says:

          But believing they are stupid, is foolish and doesn’t explain their abilities to grift a natiojn for decades.. They are evil not stupid.

          Liked by 5 people

          • ms doodlebug says:

            I agree it’s foolish to write them off as stupid. But when about 40% of eligible voters don’t vote and many more vote for the same grifters time after time, it’s letting them get away with it.

            Liked by 1 person

      • redthunder238 says:

        True, I’ve gotten into multiple arguments lately with friends who call demons like Pelosi “Stupid”. They’re not stupid AT ALL. They’re pure manipulation.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Jaap Titulaer says:

      >> 1) Hearsay 2) Opinion 3) Does not agree with the actual call transcript 4) Describes actions fully within the power, duties and obligations of the President <<


  4. Lucille says:

    Lavrentiy Beria (1899 – began his afterlife in hell in the Year of Our Lord 1953. It is suggested that Schiff contemplate his like ultimate fate. Anyone who can lie while so sincerely and calmly looking into the news camera already has one foot there as it is.)

    Schiff Goes Full Stalin
    By Daniel John Sobieski – November 9, 2019
    As Rep. Adam Schiff’s “sentence first, trial later” show trial of President Donald J. Trump reaches a so-called public hearing phase, we find the weaver of fables dictating what witnesses the GOP will be permitted to call based on a set of three qualifying question they must answer in advance.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. AvengingAngel says:

    Why is no one releasing the name of that stupid leaker so everyone knows it ? I can’t do a thing but Trump can do something. The president should schedule a live talk from the Oval Office and blurt out the name first thing before the networks can turn away . This is riculous .


    • 813.52Ran says:

      If President Trump utters the name in public before it is “officially” released, he will be crucified by the Democrats & MSM (same thing, I know) for outing the whistleblower. It would be framed as putting the whistleblower and his family in danger.

      President Trump is waaaaay too smart to step in that pile of Schiff.

      Liked by 2 people

  6. Brant says:

    Whether Dimrats approve any or not, this is a telegraph or who will be called I the senate part of things. The Nellie Ohr is a pull out of the bunch that low infos probably have never heard of or about. This is a signal to the left who will be called in the senate.

    I saw also that Trump had added a name or two. Again, I think a lot of this and his list is telling the dimwits who is going to be invited to the little Senate party.

    My optimistic view of things is that he has strung them along pulling them closer in with his “woe is me” victim tweets until they can’t get out of the trap. They can’t quit because they know their base will have their heads on a platter and they don’t want to go forward because they know what Trump has in store for them in the Senate.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Ray Runge says:

      Fine take on the projection for Senate Artivity. I will hold out for the Dems refusal to make fools of themselves in front of the international focus.


    • Raffaella says:

      Totally agree Brant. This list of witnesses is a WARNING to democraps. Any of these witnesses on a senate trial with President Trump’s attorneys present will be an absolute disaster for the deep state.

      Democrats made a huge mistake. They cannot back out now. They have to move forward with impeachment or they will look like losers if they don’t. If they move forward and impeach, then all their dirt will be on display on the senate trial. Any way you look at this, they will lose bigly.


  7. TwoLaine says:

    Devin Nunes was on Judge Jeanine tonight and has already rec’d word back on these witnesses. I don’t think BS gave him any of them, although it’s hard to know. The Judge interrupted him so many times he never got the full story out.

    Watters did the same thing with his guests tonight. The Hannity Disease is spreading fast.

    Liked by 5 people

    • Nunes didn’t directly answer some questions….he tried to promote his own talking point statements – sounding like a Democrat politician. No wonder the Judge interrupted him. I would have too.


    • Mikey likes it! says:

      I call it Hannity interruptus syndrome. The dude drives me nuts. He’s lucky Rush sort of has his back. Would love to switch his time slot with the Great One.

      Liked by 1 person

  8. WeThePeople2016 says:

    You knew this was coming.

    Liked by 3 people

  9. DesertRain says:

    Hummm… check out Interesting post in Sundance twitter feed… it is a reply on SD’s tweet concerning Vindman in uniform.

    SD post:
    “The word “coup” shifted to a new level of meaning when the resistance showed up to remove President Trump wearing military uniforms.”

    Reply post:
    “Ahem: A certain wedding in the UK with main ppt in ‘uniform’ and Head of State attending that declared non state event. It’s long been known to by the old girl that it was a coup and was having none of it. BUT for Epstein prob in fam we’d already have the coup plotters arrested.”
    6:13 PM – 9 Nov 2019

    Was the leaked video on Epstein a play to silence the Queen?


    • seekingthetruth2 says:

      “Ahem: A certain wedding in the UK with main ppt in ‘uniform’ and Head of State attending that declared non state event. It’s long been known to by the old girl that it was a coup and was having none of it. BUT for Epstein prob in fam we’d already have the coup plotters arrested.”

      It’s is late and I have had a Jamison or two. Can someone translate this for me?


  10. ezgoer says:

    The only thing keeping the GOPe in the Senate somewhat supporting Trump is the belief that majority of GOP base will abandon them in 2020 if they allow Trump to be removed. Those of you with GOP Senators call or write to them and reinforce that if they don’t defend this president you will abandon them in 2020 (or when they come up for re-election). The strongest desire these parasites have is to remain in office for life.

    Liked by 1 person

  11. OldParatrooper says:

    While I recognize that an Impeachment Hearing isn’t an Article III courtroom case, the more the Democrats deviate from the criminal trial pattern, the more the public will question the results.

    So far the Dems have violated a number of publicly recognized defendants rights:
    1. The right to confront your accuser (Schiff says the Whistleblower’s testimony would be redundant)
    2. The right to counsel (Trump’s attorney is not allowed to participate in the hearings)
    3. The right to cross examine witnesses (the prosecution gets to vet the defense questions and direct witnesses not to answer)
    4. The right to a public jury trial (Closed door sessions preceded the open ones)

    A public raised on Perry Mason, Law and Order, and Matlock have seen these issues argued and if pointed out, will recognize them in the Impeachment. It our job to make sure the broader public recognizes the Dem’s bastardization of the process.


  12. askandgettruth says:

    schiff has the balls to put honorable on his letter-head. what a POS . the people have to take this gov. back. i fear that a revolution will be the only way


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s