REPOST: Details of House “Impeachment Inquiry” Resolution…

Repost by Request – with intro:   After the 2018 mid-terms, and in preparation for the “impeachment” strategy, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler hired Lawfare group members to become House committee staff.

Chairman Schiff hired former SDNY U.S. Attorney Daniel Goldman (link), and Chairman Nadler hired  Obama Administration lawyer Norm Eisen and criminal defense attorney Barry Berke (link).  House Speaker Nancy Pelosi then hired Douglas Letter as House General Counsel – all are within the Lawfare network.

[Barry Berke, left and Norm Eisen, right – pictured exiting the HSCI scif with Jerry Nadler on the same day Pelosi’s “Impeachment Inquiry” Resolution was released, 10/29/19]

After Goldman, Eisen, Berke and Letter were hired in late 2018, Pelosi then went about changing the Rules of the House in January ’19.  Few were paying attention until recently.

In the last month many people have surmised that Pelosi and Schiff moved to utilize the Ukraine/NSC impeachment angle *after* the Mueller angle for impeachment ran into trouble. However, CTH research (widely criticized in 2018) doesn’t reflect the Whistle-blower impeachment plan as an ‘add-on’.  Instead, what we see is the use of the HPSCI; and the use of embeds within National Security Council staff; by design.  The Schiff events of today were always part of a prior planned design.

Only two committees hired Lawfare staff in 2018: Judiciary (Eisen & Berke) and HPSCI (Goldman).  This evidences a 2018 plan to use the Judiciary and HPSCI for the impeachment process as designed by the Lawfare contractors.  This design is also outlined in the year of public advice from the mother-ship, Lawfare.

They impeachment crew always planned to use the House Intelligence Committee; and they always planned to use activated sleeper cells within the National Security Staff.  None of this is organic; none of this current action was contingent upon a Trump phone call.  The whistle-blower approach was always going to be used; the only issue was: ‘how’?

That sets the context for the slick moves by Pelosi and Schiff’s Lawfare team.  The contracted legal staff within House Intelligence Committee produced a House “Impeachment Inquiry” resolution to be voted on tomorrow.

By all appearances the impeachment crew is following a legal strategy.  Leading with Nadler (Mueller) in the HJC was part of that forethought.  Berke and Eisen would then go after the Mueller evidence (grand jury, 6e material).   Whether Judge Beryl Howell was/is in-on-it; and whether the DOJ staff tanked the oral arguments on purpose; is up for debate… but the plan was always thus.

Once, Barry Berke and Norm Eisen gained Judicial impeachment validation from a federal judge, that’s where Chairman Schiff and Daniel Goldman come in.  Goldman is the Lawfare contractor leading the questioning and framing the House impeachment inquiry approach through the use of the HPSCI rules that are useful in their secrecy.

The primary point is: none of this process-flow is accidental.  There is a design evident in activity that is only visible in hindsight.

Why does this matter?

Because if we can see the visible House plan; and if we accept the deliberate process it has taken to carry it out; then why would we assume there isn’t a similar plan for the Senate?

♦ Constitutional professor Lawrence Tribe is to the left as Mark Levin is to the right.

To the Lawfare crew, Lawrence Tribe is their Svengali.  Tribe has been hinting toward a process that could be possible within the Senate. [SEE HERE]   Ignore him at our peril.

Retreating to the Senate as the Alamo, where all hope falls upon the action of Mitch McConnell, isn’t exactly the most reassuring plan.  That approach means the House will have then destroyed the structural intention of the constitutional intent surrounding the impeachment process.

This needs to be fought hard, to stop the House from codifying a process that will forever change the office of the president.  The precedent being outlined here is alarming.

The crafted resolution that will be voted upon tomorrow (full pdf below) contains the rules constructed by Nadler and Shiff’s Lawfare staff, for public HPSCI hearings.

The House impeachment resolution blocks President Trump’s lawyers from participating in the House process until the hand-off to the Judiciary Committee for article assembly.

Within the House resolution is a process to transfer the evidence from the three investigative committee chairs: Schiff, Engel and Maloney, to Jerry Nadler at Judiciary. [The process within Judicary will be assembling the ‘articles of impeachment’.]

What Pelosi/Schiff et al have assembled is a format for a highly controlled public spectacle prior to a predetermined transfer of evidence to Jerry Nadler (Judicary). With the intent to construct a pantomime for public absorption in mind, the rules are written for maximum narrative construction. [ex. Lawfare lawyers will question witnesses]

The rules within the resolution outline the guidance for at least one public hearing from the HPSCI prior to transfer to Judiciary. The Oversight Committee, Foreign Affairs Committee and Intelligence Committee are assembling publicly under the House Intelligence Committee (HPSCI) for that/those public hearing(s).

Key points from rules:

  • The Executive Branch will not be permitted to participate in the open HPSCI hearing.
  • President Trump lawyers will not be permitted to question witnesses in the open HPSCI hearing.
  • Ranking member of HPSCI (Nunes) may have subpoena power subject to pre-approval by Chairman Adam Schiff. Requests must be made in writing. Chair is not mandated to approve.
  • Ranking member of HPSCI (Nunes) may have ability to request witnesses subject to pre-approval by Chairman Adam Schiff. Requests must be made in writing. Chair is not mandated to approve.
  • Schiff (Chairman) and Nunes (Ranking member) will each have 90 minutes (aggregate) to question any witness brought before the committee. All other committee members will have 5 minutes each, per witness. [Remember this is a member assembly of 3 committees]
  • The Chairman can allow contracted legal staff (Lawfare) to question witnesses, as part of his 90-minutes of available questioning.
  • The Chair is authorized, though not required, to make depositions public.
  • Upon completion of the hearing(s), the HPSCI chairman shall write a **report to the Judiciary (Nadler) with instructions of findings. The chair may include dissent from the minority opinion therein.

[**Note: IMHO this report has already been written. That was the purpose for the basement hearings. All of this public testimony is for public consumption to support the premise of a constitutional impeachment proceedings. It’s a farce.]

  • The resolution then provides a process for the HPSCI report to transfer all of the assembled tri-committee material to the House Judiciary Committee where Jerry Nadler will take over.

The next part of the resolution is the House approving of the transfer process, and setting up rules for the Judiciary Committee phase. The Judiciary Committee (HJC) then shifts to official Impeachment Hearings, prior to articles of impeachment being assembled.

  • The HJC Ranking member (Doug Collins) shall have subpoena power subject to approval by the HJC Chair, Jerry Nadler.
  • The HJC ranking member shall have the ability to request witness testimony, subject to approval by the HJC Chair, Jerry Nadler.
  • The HJC will allow participation by President Trump’s counsel.

Within the rules, the existence of judicial enforcement authority -punishment for refusing to provide documents and witnesses by subpoena- is assumed. Based on the construction of this resolution, and with Judge Howell’s court decision still standing, this presumption by the House appears structurally solid.

Here’s the full pdf of the rules:


“The resolution provides rules for the format of open hearings in the House Intelligence Committee, including staff-led questioning of witnesses, and it authorizes the public release of deposition transcripts.

“The evidence we have already collected paints the picture of a President who abused his power by using multiple levers of government to press a foreign country to interfere in the 2020 election. Following in the footsteps of previous impeachment inquiries, the next phase will move from closed depositions to open hearings where the American people will learn firsthand about the President’s misconduct.” (LINK)

Lawfare lawyers Barry Berke and Norm Eisen, leading participants in the construction of the impeachment rules, October 29, 2019, entering the SCIF with Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler


This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Cold Anger, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, Election 2020, Impeachment, Legislation, media bias, Nancy Pelosi, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Supreme Court, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized, USA. Bookmark the permalink.

436 Responses to REPOST: Details of House “Impeachment Inquiry” Resolution…

  1. littleanniefannie says:

    Shows Egomaniacal Democrats Ignoring Their Integrity Through Illegal, Onerous Nefariousness.

    Charge the entire leadership coup. Prosecute them. Don’t wait for the $hit$how to begin. Matt Gaetz filed one ethics complaint. Every honest Congressman should also file a complaint. If the Demons succeed here, they will have signed a declaration of war. They will be worse than Hitler or his officers ever imagined.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Y’all Know What Time It is says:

      Politico artIcle says “House Republicans — who had previously demanded Democrats take this exact step to formalize their process — have been furious at the details of the resolution. They claimed it limited minority party rights and attacked the Democrats for “secret interviews” and “selective leaks” designed to …

      Actually Republicans have called for a vote on having an impeachment investigation. Only that gives the Inquiry-ers subpoena powers and also gives the minority party one rights in the investigation. Because they haven’t done this Republicans only recourse is to not cooperate until they do. Democrats want to present that as obstruction. So they vote on , according to Nanzi, “not an impeachment investigation vote.”
      Now when Republicans continue to not cooperate they, and the alleged “Free Press” ,
      will claim that it’s obstruction of justice. It’s their go to when the facts don’t support their allegations ie., Russia collusion, Ukraine quid pro quo. Etc.


    • amazed treetop downlooker says:

      Loyal legal counselors, HELP
      Is this an immediately “actionable” tactic, within days, if not hours ?

      Liked by 1 person

  2. mike says:

    We are being slow walked and driven into a Matrix-like scenario. Half the population has been blue pilled for real. All the DeepStaters have to do is kick Trump out by any means and they will unleash endless Agent Smiths and blue pills upon us via Google, Facebook, MSM etc.

    Trump or bust, boy toy Pence isn’t even a 1/10th replacement (bungled Flynn and bailed for a day at the “pussy” crescendo before the election…).

    If DeepStaters succeed we will have arrived at a civil war moment upside down and out of time (Gen X and Z blue pilled and scheduled for Replacement) with the criminals and traitors of the last century (Wilson, FDR, LBJ. Hill and Bill, O) validated forever more in “history”. China and DS will have the financial conrols in place forever more.

    Please PDJT declass and massively indict NOW. If you wait they will drown all Truths out at the final moment and will orchestrate a coup that CAN succeed. Otherwise it means (our?) blood in the streets to stop the Matrix scenario, and a high likelihood failure for the red pill of reality and Republic.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Ausonius says:

      Allow me to pose this scenario : indictments NOW will only be propagandized as retaliation for the impeachment “process,” an attempt to intimidate the poor DEMS, and as an admission of guilt and absolute proof that an impeachment-coup d’etat is necessary!

      In this scenario President Trump loses among The Great Uninformed.

      Letting the DEMS continue their phony baloney will only work to the president’s advantage.

      “Blood in the streets” may come anyway, with or without a removal ratified by DEMS and RINO’s in the Senate: Election 2020 – when the president wins – will only be the start of an even worse mania.

      The DEMS will never let this go until they are destroyed in one way or another. They will not go quietly into defeat. However, which side has the most armed pick-up trucks? 😉

      Liked by 4 people

      • Mostly Fired Up says:

        But, the net outcome will be the same either way. Whatever Trump does will be perceived as illegitimate so why wait? Win now or win later, same result.

        Liked by 1 person

      • mike says:

        I agree about the “destroyed” requirement, literally. They are desperate and they hope to pull it out, again. Treason and trickery have worked many, many time in the past, again and again.

        For Bill and Hill many times e.g. if Bill wasn’t elected in ’92 to fire all the sitting District Attorneys, he probably would have been charged with drug related felonies. If JFK hadn’t been assassinated 11/23/63, LBJ would have been out by exposure of some (massive) crimes in Life magazine in Dec 1963, in prison for murders and massive frauds in Texas. Story was canned 11/23…

        It really boils down to whether they can effect a coup now and/or continue the vote fraud businesses. They only have to remove Trump once, no matter how many failures or what cost. They are quite to prepared to pay with our lives.

        Liked by 3 people

      • Eagle61 says:

        There has already been “blood in the streets”. I understand your phrase. The Antifa, CPUSA, BLM and others have bloodied and killed several (many) patriots.

        This is a battle to the death. The Central Banks, Oligarchs, Deep State, NWO; whatever you want to call them, have lined up against Trump and the Patriots.

        Liked by 2 people

        • Matthew LeBlanc says:

          The Rothschild quote is stating sell the stocks (take action) when the real fighting begins and it can’t be put back in the bottle. These skirmishes that you list always occur before the “first” shot is actually fired. US reps were beating other US reps to near death in the halls of congress while John Brown was running around killing mercilessly but it was the shot on Fort Sumter that started the Civil War.


      • As a man thinkth says:

        Waiting for justice is exactly what WE THE PEOPLE have been prayerfully doing for two and one half YEARS….
        IMHO, we have turned our bloody cheeks till there is no flesh left. Justice is being hidden and slow walked…The perpetrators walk smugly among us, there is no fear or remorse…as if they confidently know exactly how this will end…all actions perpetrated by the coup goons have been carefully scripted and directed by Lawfare long before PDJT became President…


      • jeff montanye says:

        imo the president should proceed with the trials with deliberate speed. from all of what i’ve seen he has the facts and the law on his side. clapper has already said he was just following orders from obama.

        Liked by 1 person

    • dawg says:

      “Half the population has been blue pilled for real.”

      I was just going to say kinda the opposite. More and more people are taking the red pill everyday. We are getting to the point where the vast majority of the public can already see that everything the Dems have been doing against Trump for the last several years has just been one charade or hoax after another. And we havent even got to the IG report yet and Barr and Durham investigatin just went criminal.

      Even many of the people who wouldnt want to admit it, know deep down thats the case, that all of this is baseless. I dont think we can assume that those people would go along with fraudulently removing a President who they know had done nothing wrong.

      I submit that there would be no more than 25% of the electorate that would approve of removing Trump knowing he wasnt guilty of anything.

      There is no blue pill. There are hard core leftists that will always be that, but there is nothing that could happen that could show them they have been correct in their leftism.

      There is only a red pill. There are those who have taken it, those who wont ever take it, and those who havent take it yet.

      There just is no blue pill to take. Because Truth.

      Liked by 3 people

      • mike says:

        Red pilled is a temporary problem to them. Look at how China deals with unhappy people when they have the guns, camps and blue pills, including Google.

        They will Replace us, kill us, cheat us, lie to us and indoctrinate our descendants. They just need to tag Trump out, once, under the slimmest, sketchiest excuses. At 3 am by hook or by crook. Another few billion in aggregate bribes wouldn’t be too much, except that they can buy congressmen cheaper than that (e.g. $10-20 million each for a few Senators to call in sick)…

        Liked by 1 person

        • jhynds says:

          I believe the Deep Blue State has been operating for years and most of our elected representatives (R&D) have been operating there for themselves only. What we are now witnessing is the “Trump Effect.” He suddenly walks out of the Matrix and into their Personal Piggy Back and says Enough is Enough! Because this has been going on for so long, we all have been turned bluer than we know. The Red Pill is our minds’ immediate reaction to waking, and realizing we’re are now awake and have been a living nightmare, and can not let it continue. Our joining in the Trump Effect is saying the Enough is Enough, but we will not solve anything in the short term. This has been ongoing for 50+ years and we are now at the tipping point of helping to return some Red into our Blue nation. This is the beginning, not the middle and by no means the end.

          Liked by 1 person

          • jeff montanye says:

            bust crossfire hurricane and change this next election.
            bust 9-11 and change the world.

            Liked by 1 person

          • hemifoxxx says:

            You’re so right about this being *NOT* a new thing! R&D have been lining their pockets for a century or better now. What is new (or was 10-11 years ago) is electing a President that *NEVER* had ANY experience to be the leader of the free world! Be DAMNED his skin color! I could care less! That man had NO business being President because he had NO experience running ANYTHING! HELL, I don’t believe McCain would have been a good President, but at least he’d been in the trenches long enough. BHO was *bought* to the Presidency by Soros + the Deep State & because of that, his radical upbringing/agenda took root that *woke* the dragon in the illiterate, illegitimate the ill-gotten & bleeding-heart liberals (Looney Left). For the first time, they (all together) had a voice…a POWERFUL voice! And it “Fundamentally transformed America”…an America more to *their* liking & Hillary was going to be the “just couldn’t lose” “first female candidate” “eight more years (of Looney Left policy)” that was supposed to *cement* their rule…except for this *little known*, *average Joe*, BILLIONARE named…you guessed it… Donald J Trump (Thank You, JESUS!)

            Well….THAT REALLY PISSED OFF THE LEFT! There was NO WAY Hillary could lose!

            Now they are out for BLOOD! Yours, mine, POTUS’, FLOTUS’ & ANY Conservative standing in the way!

            They’re going to do ANYTHING to get that power back!


  3. dawg says:

    “Because if we can see the visible House plan; and if we accept the deliberate process it has taken to carry it out; then why would we assume there isn’t a similar plan for the Senate?”

    Because simple math.

    Im certainly not a professor of constitutional law at Harvard Law School and even I brought up the point about the word “present” in the Senate Impeachment rules in the Constitution a week or two ago.

    What are they going to do, bar the R Senators access to the Senate floor?

    Do the R Senators think they could get away with just NOT showing up to vote so they let the D Senators “present” impeach a President enjoying the highest approval rating among its party who is overseeing the strongest economy in our history?

    Sundance, I would really like to get your honest opinion on something. You are really good about laying out the facts, but never really come out and say what you think personally, or give your opinion. We appreciate that and its nice to get just the facts considering all the opinions out there. But I really want to know what YOU think.

    Do you personally think that the the the powers that be are actually trying to remove the President from office?

    Are they so far removed from reality to think they could get away with that? Do they think We wouldn’t take up arms and storm Washington if they did that?

    Liked by 2 people

    • Ausonius says:

      See my comment above!


    • mike says:

      We wouldn’t take up arms and storm Washington if they did that?
      Yes, they are ready to mow people down if necessary, but they probably have better deflection than that. Cut a bridge here, start an epidemic there…

      A century of prior experience shows all these.


      • amazed treetop downlooker says:

        Sadly so, “Balkanization” by any means necessary is the horrendous strategy in their evil toolbox.will work the best….same old, same old, satan’ “divide to conquer”.

        Guerrilla warfare, as (? we’ve seen, some of us) has been proving for decades to all with open eyes just how UGLY the deck is stacked against freedom loving, ‘originalist’ Constitutionalists. There won’t be that many clear cut battle lines to storm, likely.
        Gonna be incredibly complex, localized/regionalized.

        One things for sure….anybody who supports this ugly globalist ruling over-class & their minions has gotta change or “go”, lest freedom perish!

        God help us !


    • MadKangaroo says:

      “What are they going to do, bar the R Senators access to the Senate floor? ”

      No, but is is conceivable that the requisite number of Rs will simply not show up. A good many of them are Liberals, plus Trump is a threat to their corruption as well (see e.g., Collins, Romney).

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Steve says:

    Interesting photo. Look at the lanyard on the partially pictured individual on the right.s


  5. Alan Reasin says:

    This is very important in the debate today; call your reps.. The rules change will not permit exculpatury omfo from being given to the POTUS. That is unconstitutional under the Bardy Ruling revised in 1972: In Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150, 153 (U.S. 1972), the Supreme Court extended the prosecution’s obligations under Brady to disclosure of impeachment evidence. Supreme Court clarified that all impeachment evidence, even if not a prior statement by a witness falls within the Brady rule.


  6. B Woodward says:

    Rep Gaetz had was right. AG Barr needs to prosecute these people who are not elected reps. The deep state should know that there are criminal penalties for their coup attempt.

    Representative Matt Gaetz: “I believe there has been a criminal conspiracy underway to discredit and undermine the duly elected president of the United States you had a cabal of people who believed that it was their job to deprive the American people of the president they elected.
    18 U.S. Code § 241 – Conspiracy against rights: If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same;

    Liked by 1 person

    • TwoLaine says:

      And they steamrolled all of this through desspite the fact that the President of Ukraine said, “No pressure, No qpq”, the transcript reflects the same, and the DOJ had already ruled there was no issue.

      I’m pretty sure that Rudy G was saying this before Matt Gaetz.


  7. Jederman says:

    If the requisite number of Rs in the senate were somehow, suspiciously absent during an impeachment vote in the senate and the dems prevailed, all hell would break loose.

    The mere fact that this schit stick tribe would connive like a sneaky little gerbil cooking up ways to remove a sitting president is an indicator (or should be) to the very very few potentially normal dems in this country that their party is anti-American and they will eventually be tossed over the side too once in power.

    Are these people incapable of seeing where this is going? Are they unconcerned about their children living in a socialist/communist system?

    If this coup is successful expect a quick and serious escalation of LE and IC “involvement” in our daily lives. The DS show must go on. The economy must not be threatened. The profits must continue for the WS crowd.

    If the president doesn’t get equal treatment under the law, why would we? Voter records and party affiliation are open source.

    Perfect timing for an introduction to Barr’s pre-crime initiative.


    • Mostly Fired Up says:

      ” Voter records and party affiliation are open source.”

      Really surprised people still cling to party affiliation. Take yourself off the books and list as an independent or un-enrolled. Let them guess which way you vote or lean.


  8. Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

    After watching the opening remarks this morning have to say that we heard the word CONSTITUTION mentioned by the Democrats more times than all of the past 40 years put together. All of a sudden they seem to hold the great document in reverence and they are trying to use it to justify their witch hunt. Apparently they think that they can declare the President guilty of something and claim that it is their duty to prosecute him for that imaginary crime.

    As one Democrat congressman stated yesterday, “We have determined that Trump is guilty of abuse of power and if he is innocent let him prove it!” The supposed free press is going along with the charade and agree that guilty until proven innocent is the new normal. God help us!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Alan Reasin says:

      They don’t follow the Constitution as this shows
      This is very important in the debate today; I have called the House GOP leadership and the President. The House rules changed under this resolution will not permit exculpatory info from being given to the POTUS team.. Rep. Lesko pf AZ tried to amend the resolution and it was rejected That is unconstitutional under the Brady Ruling revised in 1972: The Representatives I called did not know of the extension of the 1963 Brady ruling to include impeachments.
      In Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150, 153 (U.S. 1972), the Supreme Court extended the prosecution’s obligations under Brady to disclosure of impeachment evidence.

      The Supreme Court clarified that all impeachment evidence, even if not a prior statement by a witness falls within the Brady rule.

      White House number 202-456-1111
      All GOP numbers

      Liked by 1 person

  9. Henry chance says:

    It is my understanding that waterboarding is out of the picture.

    I suggest a witness called to”testify to The House” in their opening statement say they are willing to answer questions by elected members of Congress only for 5 minutes each. The 2-door Ford was a prime example of a witness calling the shots.


  10. Robert W says:

    I dont understand if all of these actions by the dems are NOT- lawful and very Unconstitutional, then non of their actions matter. It’s a mute point. Their process is not backed by the Constitution and will be found illegal by the Supreme Court. POTUS and the Repubs don’t have to play their game and are backed by the law doing so. So, why be so scared?


  11. DogGreenSector says:

    There is something about LawFare’s Norm Eisen that is very creepy. He seems to end up in way too many photographs. The lastest Weissman clone?

    Anyone who is not an elected representative should be told be every Republican to S.M.D.


  12. TwoLaine says:

    Someone really smart should point out that what is going on with the DIMs in their Soviet Star Chamber is exactly what happens in the FISA courts.

    Secret hearings, all one-sided, ZERO represenation. No one gets to see, or hear, or watch, while our rights are stripped from us and we are effectively naked and silenced. Then our lives are invaded by who knows what manner of alphabet agencies seeking revenge and set on havoc.

    I need a shower.

    Liked by 4 people

  13. semiold says:

    Our salvation is where it has always been. We must all pray to the Lord God of Israel and America! Trump himself must lead this prayer. The Lord has told us He will hear and answer!


  14. warrprin1 says:

    I just got off the phone with a staffer in Congressman Scott Perry’s D.C. office. U.S. Congressman Perry is my Rep. Ready for this Treepers? The gentleman staffer with whom I exchanged questions and answers HAS NEVER HEARD OF THE LAWFARE GROUP.

    I referred him to the Treehouse, and specifically to this particular article above. This poor fellow’s life inside a cave does not necessarily mean that Congressman Perry, himself, is ignorant of the Lawfare Group and their filthy enterprises. However, all of the “Destroy Trump” machinations are going on right under the noses of our GOP Representatives, whose staffers appear to be blithely unaware of the Dimms’ determination “by any means necessary” to overthrow our legally elected POTUS.

    Prediction: when their jobs, and our Bill of Rights, have been destroyed they will stick their thumbs in their mouths, and with complete authenticity, declare ignorance. Your, and my, tax 💲 at work.

    Sundance, as usual, is right. To take his recent forebodings a step further, it looks more and more correct to conclude that will be up to us, together with the President’s team, to save the DJT Presidency, our Constitution, and our Republic.

    Q.: How is it possible that we have come to land in this place? A.: “Our side” is living in a vacuum of heads we lose; tails they win. The ho-hum officials of the Grand Old Party exist to par-tay with the enemy.

    Liked by 1 person

    • annieoakley says:

      These staffers are in DC for life and all Dems. They don’t want any Congressman to know the TRUTH.


    • Fred Lancos says:

      I’m with you 100% – lots of people don’t know this, but 99.9% of the time, these Congressional office phones are answered by college kids/interns. You probably talked to one, and not a member of the actual staff.


  15. TwoLaine says:

    Lou Dobbs & Tom Fitton, of Judicial Watch, last night.


  16. hokkoda says:

    I’m reading Lee Smith’s book “The Plot Against the President”, and the parallels between how the FBI and IC set up Flynn with how the Congress and the NSC spies are trying to set up Trump are amazing.

    In both cases, there was a very simple phone call that involved nothing illegal or untoward. In both cases, unnamed officials became “alarmed” about what they thought they heard or read. In both cases, those unnamed officials were never required to reveal themselves publicly. In both cases, this led to accusations that Flynn/Trump had done something illegal or unethical requiring an investigation which then took on a life of its own. In Flynn’s case, quote unquote lying to the FBI. This led ultimately to the attempt to frame Trump for obstruction of justice.

    Both roads started the same and are trying to get to the same destination.

    I almost never buy these Conservative Inc. books, but this one is the real deal. The way Lee maps out the coordinated hits from the proto-dossiers to the Steele dossiers to the media leaks and hit pieces – which were then used as “evidence” to feed the warrants – is staggeringly bad. As he writes, the journalists went from being partisans to being active participants in the coup.

    Anyway, this is a good line of attack for the Trump team. Just start pointing out how everything is being done in the exact same way. We call it coup 2.0, but I would be more specific about the parallels. The Democrats are doing with Ukraine what Steele did with the protodossiers – recycle old strategies and put new names in the blanks.

    Liked by 1 person

    • foodog says:

      Correct. They are doing it because they got away with it,

      because they know the legal process to reverse it is too slow and cumbersome to be effective.
      CIA/FBI spying on US citizen, weaponizing FISA…remember the AG Sessions ordered Huber grand jury, shut down in 2nd Circuit by Obama judge?
      Durham investigation ordered by AG Barr, which is waiting on the IG investigation, which is waiting on the…(fill in the blank).

      Look at how CA AG Harris conspired with CA Dems in Sacramento who conspired with 9th Circus to deny 2A rights to citizens there. It works, so they are doing it again, at the national level.

      Liked by 1 person

    • DesertRain says:

      Agreed. The Lee Smith book is the real deal.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Matthew LeBlanc says:

      What we are witnessing is the CIA turning it’s dirty tricks inward on the American people and our own elected officials and their administration. We now get to live through what others across the globe lived through as the CIA worked to overthrow their government. Dangerous times we live in.

      Liked by 1 person

      • hokkoda says:

        They’re on their second attempt in 3 years using the exact same $&@?! strategy.

        I wish I had any faith in Barr/Durham to hang these guys, but I don’t. Guess we’ll see.


  17. Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

    So the House vote is done and only 2 Democrats voted against this travesty of justice. All Republicans present voted against it. 4 of each Party for whatever reasons didn’t vote.


  18. foodog says:

    Interesting that House Committees are being coordinated to advance idea that the Pelosi/Schiff/Nadler Star Chamber process is legal, somehow


  19. foodog says:

    Watching Drudge to see how he spins this-
    Topline left-
    1.Yahoo news parroting BloomTurd:
    2.MSN, respinning LAT
    3. McClatchy DC bureau

    well, thats enough- dont want to wear out my welcome here overdoing the side question about Drudge and media bias in favor of the Dems strategy- its obvious enough to any long time news reader.

    The question is- will deliberate FakeNews Soviet Style Agit Prop be enough to persuade the American People to go along with Pelosi Smear run by the Deep State?

    tik tok…


  20. DesertRain says:

    National security will be used as a reason to redact testimony in transcripts declassified for review by the Congress body, and in those released to the public.
    Message to decision-makers is this : using the “National Security” designation in a false manner, i.e. to hide testimony for political purpose, will be judged as actions purposely intended to prevent the people from learning truth.


  21. icubud says:

    When will it be ok for the people who have elected the President to storm Congress and physically remove these criminals from their offices?! They are hiding behind:
    1. elections
    2. DC police
    3. the fact conservatives and such who voted for Trump being followers of the rule of law.
    Seems to me, behind these 3 walls they can and plan to remove him from office.


    • flova says:

      If we conservatives and President Trump are the Nazis they say we are, none of this would be happening.

      Those Northern Virginians who booed a President who had just brought down a bloodthirsty terrorist tells you all you have to know about the kind of demonic possession we are dealing with. They love communists and terrorists and if they have to kill all 63 million of us to get their power back, they would do it in a heartbeat.


  22. keepin’itreal says:

    Trump has millions of dollars in his campaign coffers. Why in the world is his campaign not utilizing them to organize demonstrations in DC, Capitol Hill and throughout the country? Naivety? Overconfidence? Or both. You decide.


  23. Bill Dumanch says:

    Never (at age 61) have I been SO very disappointed in lawmakers.
    Never (at age 61) have I thought of a Constitutional Crisis would occur.
    Kruschef was right-Commies will go in and never fire a shot.
    A NEW WAY to Halloween! Take OFF your disguises! House-to-house Searches!
    Welcome Comrades!
    With love,

    Liked by 1 person

  24. Kleen says:

    Well D. Bongino just laid out some evidence of the rumorblower being Eric Ciamarella.

    He is also “ Charlie” the spy Lisa Page and her lover inserted in the WH to spy on Trump

    They refer to him as Charlie on their emails. ( he worked with the other criminal Chalupa)

    If so, wouldn’t he be under investigation? Since the spying on Trump is under investigation?


  25. lurker2 says:

    Does anyone have a link to the vote tally? I want to see which 3 GOP turds voted “present”. I cannot find the vote details. Is this deliberate? I’m a good internet searcher.


  26. Samuel Hain says:

    Lawfare is a VERY Kosher affair!


  27. unconqueredone says:

    To my way of thinking, this is the fruit of a conscious effort by the Republican elite. The last election cycle they retired so many as to almost guarantee the D’s would win the House. I think I’ve read they already have 17 more who will not be seeking re-election this time. I believe the R elite motto is, “let the D’s do our dirty work (we will complain publicly, but do nothing to stop them)”.


    • lurker2 says:

      There were 31 House districts where voters backed Trump for president in 2016 but elected Democrat Representatives in 2018. Travesty. The current balance in the House is 234 Republicans and 197 Democrats? If those 31 seats had gone red instead of blue, the balance would have been 201 Republicans and 228 Democrats and we wouldn’t be suffering any of the nonsense that we are currently suffering. It pains me that we let Trump down in 2018.


  28. hokkoda says:

    Keep it simple, folks. Call your congressman, and if he or she voted against the sham resolution, be sure to say thank-you. Encourage them to vote “no” on every single solitary bill the House tries to vote on in committee or in total – indefinitely – regardless of content. Just start shutting that place down. I haven’t heard yet if any Republicans crossed over to vote with the Dems, but if they did, and they’re your Rep., you need to call and yell at them for awhile and then you need to vote them out of office next election.

    In the Senate, same drill. Call your Senator, make sure they understand that this vote means absolutely nothing. You expect them to stand firm against this attempted coup d’etat.

    The Democrats are fighting a battle against Trump using the old rules of D.C. Make up some false accusations, try the person in the media, get the Republicans to waffle, and then get the person to resign. Trump is not playing that game, and we will not allow the Senate to waffle. Tell them to just ignore whatever they hear in the press, and you’ve got their back in the General Election. If they waffle, you’ll vote them out.

    Keep it simple. This is a paperwork impeachment like i’ve been saying for a couple of months now. It matters not what the procedure is or the so-called evidence is. The Democrats will use what they can twist and outright fabricate what they need.

    The best response to this is an impenetrable WALL OF NO’s.


  29. FairTaxGuy60 says:

    Sundance – You provide a wealth of tremndous information. It is infuruating to continue to read it and see nothing ever happening to stop it. Can you put it all together for us and tell us: 1. Will this injustice against POTUS ever end favorably? 2. If so, how and when do you see it happening? 3. If not, tell us now.


  30. L. E. Joiner says:

    The Republicans in the House should present a united front and refuse to cooperate further with these patently illegal and unconstitutional proceedings. They should boycott any and all hearings styled as ‘impeachment inquiries’.

    The President should refuse to allow any further executive-branch witnesses to ‘impeachment inquiry’ committee meetings (or ‘depositions’), and should challenge all real or fake subpoenas in court on grounds of Executive Privilege and National Security.

    The President should also make an address to the nation explaining all of this.


  31. Matthew LeBlanc says:

    What would the future generations call ours if we lost the Republic to a group of corrupt lawyers such as those in the picture?


  32. As a man thinkth says:

    Waiting for justice is exactly what WE THE PEOPLE have been prayerfully doing for two and one half YEARS….
    IMHO, we have turned our bloody cheeks till there is no flesh left. Justice is being hidden and slow walked…The perpetrators walk smugly among us, there is no fear or remorse…as if they confidently know exactly how this will end…all actions perpetrated by the coup goons have been carefully scripted and directed by Lawfare long before PDJT became President…

    Liked by 1 person

  33. MGBSE says:

    This is a DEPRESSING read!!!

    Knowing that the entire RINO-RAT world is working 24/7 to put together a LIE to destroy President Trump is stunning.

    Besides voting for Conservatives & Republicans in our elections…I will do the only other thing I can do… Pray.


  34. David R. Graham says:

    Berke and Eisen: they are the very model of a mod Judeo-Bolshevik.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s