Solomon Reports: Ukraine Investigation into Burisma/Biden Was Re-Opened in February 2019…

Journalist John Solomon appeared on Fox News with Sean Hannity last night to drop a considerably important revelation. According to Solomon’s reporting the White House has open-sourced evidence that Ukraine re-opened their investigation into Burisma Holdings and Hunter Biden in February 2019; several months before President Trump spoke to President Zelenskyy.

This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Donald Trump, Election 2020, energy, European Union, Impeachment, Joe Biden, media bias, President Trump, propaganda, Ukraine, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

117 Responses to Solomon Reports: Ukraine Investigation into Burisma/Biden Was Re-Opened in February 2019…

  1. tominellay says:

    Well, well…! Trump is REALLY good at this…

      • Pf1289 says:

        Jim, Joe’s brother, is going down. Did you read the article? Don’t post misleading links/comments. Joe had no involvement in the scam his brother ran other than have his name used.

        • Bill Mitchell says:

          Isn’t that how the democrats do it?…Guilt by association! Surely Joe must be involved, they’re brotherrs after all. We’ll subpoena every family record that ever existed and all his tax records since his newspaper rout.

        • chipin8511 says:

          You think he had no involvement really? Any common sense they are all crooks….Just like he doesn’t know what his son did in China and Ukraine? Really?

          • Lester Smith says:

            Lots of flavors of Kool aid on sale these days.

          • Boston Bean says:

            chipin, you’re engaging in guilt-by-association, a favorite (instinctive, actually) liberal tactic. It’s one thing for Jim Biden to cash in on his brother’s name, it’s another for Joe to be actually involved. The connections with Hunter are much more concrete, notably Joe’s holding $1B hostage until Ukranian Prosecutor Shokin was fired.
            Example of guilt-by-association:
            Trump appeals to conservatives.
            Conservatives are not “woke” on racial issues like enlightened Progressives.
            Thus, Conservatives are racist.
            Therefore, Trump is a racist.

            • Dee Paul Deje says:

              And POTUS is tweeting his campaign commercial featuring Biden’s video confession. LOL

            • chipin8511 says:

              Then explain to me how Joe owns the largest mansion in his state and a multi million $ beach house 40 year politician 180k per year how? Both sides are corrupt look at Obama parlays a 8 year gig in the WH at 400k per year 3.2 million into 135 million Net Worth within 3 years after his WH gig how? What Trump is about to do is going to be amazing one by one he is going to bring them down corruption Pee=Losi Clintons and many more.Look at Comey net worth 25 million + how? Hang around with fleas your going to get fleas.They are all compromised and being blackmailed.One by one Trump will pick then off.

          • Pf1289 says:

            The article neither says nor implies Joe Biden was involved. You inferred that. You posted the link as if “this is the final nail in the coffin!” That sounds like CNN, etc.
            Of course Joe is crooked and corrupt! But let’s stick to what we know, like Boston Bean says below. Otherwise, you make it easy for the other side to say “lies, lies”.
            I hope he goes down…but it won’t be for this.

            • chipin8511 says:

              I agree with you my mistake its just another.
              I said this :Biden is going down too… Not another nail in the coffin you saying things I didnt say .I try to find things that maybe reveleant .. We are all on the same side I didnt realize one must 100% be politically correct. My apology pf12…

          • Eric French says:

            He withheld taxpayer aid until they fired the investigator. Quid pro quo for Quid Pro Joe, he’s neck deep, so is Obama.

            • TPW says:

              Has anyone actually gone back and counted the list of potential crimes committed during Obama term and PT’s run for office. Then 2.5 years in office ? It is mind blowiing and very hard to keep track of. Much less how they are interconnected…..Now on to the wives involved….But we must start with the easiest case to make and the most egregious. Where there is mountains of evidence that can’t be disputed. We may not be able to get into the Iwan brothers or the murder of Seth Rich. The mountains of Mueller crimes, Holder, Lerner, our Ambassador and gun running in Libya. But I think we must focus on PT and the crimes through FISA and the assault on our Liberties through NSA and the Patriot act that are not used for what they are intended. Those acts that assault our people and our country to bring us down. And the real problems going on with our fake economy and making sure PT can save some semblance of a true capitalistic economy meant to benefit all……What a task. I also think the top of the heap….which Obama isn’t close to it. But those above him must be expelled from the control leavers. At one point during PT’s campaign he jokingly said about our out of control debt….that he would do as he did during his own business problems…negotiate down our debt…Either they accept the new amount or get nothing….Really don’t think he was kidding….Including the interest we are paying which could go to 0 .And can just be happy to get partial principle With PT i Believe it is doable but with no one else, They wouldn’t even try or know where to begin. we also have to be decoupled from the world economy to a degree. Especially the world banks. Don’t know how he will rest our currency but that has to be done as well. Scary being close to retirement and the thought of your money being worth nothing. Community gardens anyone? We could not have had a better person in office just wish we could get on with the indictments and get them out of the way of progress. This is where we must step up and play a part. apologies for the long winded rant. ” Lets Roll”.

        • Santiago1314 says:

          “when Biden offered up his business card bearing Americore’s name and promised his brother could take their health care model nationwide.”… “PROMISED HIS BROTHER”… QUID-PRO-JOE strikes again

        • Santiago1314 says:

          “when Biden offered up his business card bearing Americore’s name and promised his brother could take their health care model nationwide.”… “PROMISED HIS BROTHER”… QUID-PRO-JOE strikes again

      • Landonk says:

        They are going to have to build a Biden wing at the prison.

      • Margarite says:
        Apparently Joe got 900k for “lobbying”.

      • chipin8511 says:

        Update Biden
        Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden received $900,000 for lobbying activities from Burisma Group, Ukraine’s Verkhovna Rada member Andriy Derkach said citing investigation materials.
        Derkach publicized documents which, as he said, “describe the mechanism of getting money by Biden Sr.” at a press conference at Interfax-Ukraine’s press center in Kyiv on Wednesday. -Interfax
        “This was the transfer of Burisma Group’s funds for lobbying activities, as investigators believe, personally to Joe Biden through a lobbying company. Funds in the amount of $900,000 were transferred to the U.S.-based company Rosemont Seneca Partners, which according to open sources, in particular, the New York Times, is affiliated with Biden. The payment reference was payment for consultative services,” said Derkach.
        With this information Joe Biden is done. He is history. There is no come back from this revelation. He is dirty as it gets. I am sure AG Barr and Durham have all of this and lots more on these fools. It will trace all the way back to Obama and Hillary. Between the IG Report, which is coming out in the next few days, the Barr Investigation, the stuff Huber has in those 80,000 sealed indictments in Utah and that huge NSA facility, and then Durham’s investigation and resultant prosecutions, there is no way out for these creeps. ALL of them will be ensnared ….Obama, Hillary, Biden, Comey, Rosenstein, Mueller, Pelosi, Schiff, Romney, Kerry, etc….a whole bunch of dems and some RINO’s….will show up in these reports in various places.
        It is time to get this rodeo going…it may start on Friday with the IGReport. Durham is extending his investigation to before and well after the 2016 election. Lots of new stuff and the rats turning on each other involved in this.
        Court TV is coming back…we will be watching this every day for months, leading right up to the election.
        Pelosi and Schiff are done for. Nobody is taking their coup seriously now. Their fake impeachment, being held in secret in a large commercial refrigerator that is about 10x 12 feet, without republicans being able to comment, cross-examine, etc. is a joke. You don’t impeach anybody this way. They have nothing on Trump, just the show. Schiff is also holding back 100% exculpatory evidence that clears Trump of any wrongdoing, that is why he is holding the meetings in secret so that that doesn’t come out. The Ambassador clearly said that there was “absolutely NO quid-pro-quo by Trump”. That is all we needed. Once that was on record, and with all of the other stuff about to come out, it will turn on Pelosi and Schiff as sedition and treason. They are about to get plastered in real time all over the place. The fake “whistle-blowers” are working for Biden.
        I am ready for this. Let’s rock and roll!

  2. teaforall says:

    This is Great, enough of this BS . Just watch Pelosi will walk away from this. Yesterday she stated that she is looking at prescription price, next will be USMCA. Justin is not looking good either and congress needs to do some work. For 3 years it has been RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA, AND NOW ITS UKRAINE.

  3. TwoLaine says:

    Sweet! But you DIMs just keep on climbing, so you fall even further.
    Don’t say you weren’t warned by VSG himself.

  4. Bigly says:

    What gets me is how F Chuck Todd and all the others so obviously brand any contrary opinion , where there are heavy facts , as Fox News “conspiracy theories”!
    Why are the media not destroyed ? Without credibility they have nothing but noise.
    It speaks to the idiots watching the Today show, nightly news, CNN, MSNBC and all the rest. They have been completed discredited….but still go on.
    And now Fox News instead of becoming THE authority goes and hires Speaker Ryan , Brazille, and the rest. How dumb is that?

    • Garavaglia says:

      3 years of this. It’s old news.

    • chipin8511 says:

      Best place to get real news other than CTH daily reading for me..truthleaks has had this story almost 3 years ago

    • Kintbury says:

      I blame the guests. They should simply state they are amazed that the host is not the least bit interested in learning the truth. His/her audience deserves better.

      • donna kovacevic says:

        The guests on all the MSM shows are being paid big bucks to “jedu govna” eat shit and spew Lord knows what but not the truth. They have one thing in mind to call the facts conspiracy theories. I find it interesting when I see clips, they all use the same wording. If people can’t see throw that, well then, but I believe they do except for a few that have an agenda. Orange man bad and to hell with the truth and facts. God Bless PDJT.

      • Dan W says:

        Perhaps ALL the “purported” news stations need to have a disclaimer running along the bottom of the screen. I can think of some great lines.

      • Pyrthroes says:

        For decades now, anyone who pretends that print or TV media have any slightest interest in an informed public understands 100% of nothing. Like Pres. Trump’s “fair trade vs. free trade”, absent multiple, independent outlets a so-called Free Press may as well be Stalin’s “Truth” (Pravda) or Josef Goebbels’ “People’s Observer” (Volkischer Beobachter).
        Since 1996, it’s never been easier to keep abreast of developments, however colored by one’s by personal interests and opinions. Yet post-Boomer Gen Xers born 1969, Millennials born 1991, wouldn’t know a clambake from a kaffeeklatch. Then, like Charlie Brown with Lucy, they wonder why their kites are down the sewer.

    • Bigly- Not just FOX, have you looked at Drudge lately??
      I have never seen anything like it. He has gone full blown Left/Commie/Dem/Prog.
      One of the biggest traitors ever. No doubt he is being highly rewarded by his new Masters.

      • L. Gee says:

        I read Drudge was bought out by a lefty company (a Google company, maybe?). But personally, I have NO IDEA what Drudge has up on the site–because I NEVER look at it (hint: this tactic might work for you, too).

    • 2013gti says:

      Who cares about the Cuck Toad’s of the MSM. They are irrelevant. They only have a few hundred thousand viewers, and they are dropping in viewers daily. The media is/has already destroyed itself. Only the Stage 4 terminal TDS patients watches that nonsense.

    • Mr e-man says:

      Why are viewers still tuning in if their news is incorrect?
      Why are advertisers still advertising if viewership has dropped?
      Why are people still buying these advertisers products?
      As long as the money flows, the fake news will continue.

    • 1987bear says:

      RINO Ryan turning Fox into another Insane Leftist Site

  5. YvonneMarie says:

    Ha ha … ha ha ha !

  6. franuche says:

    Crap. The NeverTrumpers over at the Resurgent are not liking this!

  7. Roman Walter says:

    OOPsie. ?????

  8. Parker says:

    I hear these stories and I have two phrases which are like a constant ringing in my ears, i.e., “Mr. Trump, will you concede the election if/when you lose?” And, “If Trump wins, we’ll all hang.”
    What on earth would prompt such statements before the election was even over?

    • HB says:

      I believe the former was about stealing votes. If Trump lost, the vote count was the only thing to contest.
      The latter? The last three years of horse pucky that keeps coming to light

    • ms doodlebug says:

      “If that f*****g b*****d wins, we all hang from nooses!” Give them enough rope and they’ll hang themselves? Pelosi is right. From Strzok’s ‘We will stop him’ to McCabe’s leaking to Rosenstein’s wire, to Comey’s memos, Brennan to Schiff to Nadler to ‘peach mint’ to ‘we will impeach the mf’ and everything in between, it’s the sequencing of events that will ‘hang’ them. It’s good that they now live in fear of what they created.

  9. Petey says:

    Sun tzu, the prince, hannible, and eisenhower are in their respective resting places looking at DJT and saying “dam he s good, I would not have liked to face him on the battlefield”

  10. This news is not a bombshell—it’s a Bunker Buster.
    John Soloman has earned a pristine page in history.

  11. Garavaglia says:

    Doesn’t change the conversation Trump had to “Dig up dirt” as they are calling it, which he never said. Won’t change their efforts one bit.

    • donna kovacevic says:

      If any rational person read the transcript, they saw what the President said period full stop. The clowns that are saying “dig up dirt” can only fool the people with no grey matter that can not read, and take the MSM words as Gospel. I have faith that in the end those clowns will be outed for their evil wicked traitorous ways. Vengeance is Mine sayeth the Lord. God Bless PDJT.

  12. Marina Sapir says:

    Sorry, but it does not mean much.
    1. They (may be) had plans to reopen the investigations in February, but they did not reopen it.
    2. After Zelinsky was elected, he changed changed the directions. So, the plans were not relevant anymore.
    3. Zelinsky did not reopen the investigation before the phone call.
    4. Zelinsky did not reopen the investigation after the phone call.
    5. The only thing they are saying now, they are “planning” to investigate, if the investigation was closed properly.
    That is it.
    So, this discovery is rather irrelevant.
    I would think that Zelinsky is rooting for Democrats, and he does not want to hurt their chances.

    • Waymore says:

      According to John Solomon, the “investigation went forward…the new probe resulted in a Notice of Suspicion being filed alleging the existence of illicit funds running through the firm….”

      • Marina Sapir says:

        Exactly. It means, what they call the “investigation” was already completed. The result: Suspicion. Is this what we are supposed to be happy about?

        • donna kovacevic says:

          Where is it written or have you read that Zelinsky is on the democrat side and does not want to, my words, rock the boat with them.

          • Marina Sapir says:

            I do not know, why he does not reopen the investigation.
            There may be many reasons. Rooting for the Democrats is one of them.
            The Democrats pressure him not to look into it.
            He may be just afraid that they will get the power next time.
            But Ukraine was supporting Hillary against Trump in 2016. They had some reasons for it and, probably, still have.

        • Austin Holdout says:

          Dont know anything about Ukrainian law, but a Notice of Suspicion sounds more like an indictment or other document that would signal the case was in early, rather than final, stages. Just guessing.

      • Politico published an op-ed, by Sen. Inhofe (R-OK), stating that the Trump administration advised Congress also in February that the U.S. Dept. of Defense planned to release more aid to Ukraine.
        Considering the investigation and Notice of Suspicion (if true), it seems prudent that the Dept. of Defense would pause its planned release of more aid. Especially, considering that the imminent election in Ukraine involved a candidate who promised to end the corruption and that “illicit funds” were possibly connected to the U.S. Even the Notice of Suspicion seems a reasonable pause.

    • donna kovacevic says:

      Marina, perhaps you should get in touch with John Solomon and straighten him out in his reporting. Can you please post a link to your journalistic site, so all can read it .Odjebi cheers.

      • Marina Sapir says:

        There is absolutely nothing wrong with his reporting. How did you get an idea that I have something against it?
        I am saying that there is nothing important in these findings, even though they are 100% true..

        • willthesuevi says:

          “So, this discovery is rather irrelevant.”
          Maybe it is not important to Ukraine but it sure vindicates our President because of the very timeline. The US is fixing our own corruption problems. Ukraine, not our problem.
          We are more concerned with the false accusation of President Trump. Most of us could give 2 shits about Ukraine.

        • tozerbgood8315 says:

          “There is absolutely nothing wrong with his reporting. How did you get an idea that I have something against it?”
          Because you clearly disagree with Solomon about the importance of his findings.”
          In that, you are being disingenuous, as Solomon has reported that it is indeed important.
          So donna kovacevic suggestion is an excellent idea. You need to have some dialogue with Mr. Solomon since you have clearly challenged his opinion on the importance of his findings.
          But you probably won’t do that… because trolling CTH is much more fun/

    • In the Land of Poz says:

      Burisma was a nexus of WASHINGTON corruption. It was/is a channel for piping American aid to Ukraine back into the pockets of American (Democratic) politicians, their friends and their children, through consulting contracts, honoraria, foundations, and NGOs such as the Atlantic Council. Bidens are just one example. Ukraine, a poor country with a rather small economy, accounted for more donations to the Clinton foundation than any other country (10 million in some recent year). Congressional staffers for Schiff et al take paid trips to conferences at the Atlantic Council. It is a deep well of grift and graft of which we have only glimpsed bits and pieces… so far.
      That’s why the panic about Trump, Giuliani and Barr taking an interest in the Ukraine.
      That the Burisma investigation was picked up again, and dropped again, in early 2019 indicates that things were (obviously) still extremely sketchy there, and still subject to pressure including from US connections (mostly tied to the Obama administration). It makes it even less plausible that everything was determined to be kosher by the Ukrainian prosecutors who had looked into it for 5 minutes in 2015-6 and determined that no wrongdoing had occurred, at least not by Biden’s son. It also adds support to Trump’s concerns about Ukraine corruption and holding the aid until the concerns are addressed.
      Burisma is not one of 1000 corrupt Ukrainian entities, it is a main funnel of corruption and under-the-table influence flowing in both directions between the two countries.

  13. Will J. says:

    LOL Trumps team obviously would have known this all along. He is completely and totally toying with them at this point. He knows he has the goods and has taken a play out of their playbook by weaponizing them to be used at his convenience.
    More popcorn please.

    • Fuji flyover says:

      Like a cat with a mouse.

      • Austin Holdout says:

        Every time my cats kill something, they keep tossing it in the air and saying “come on snake (mouse, lizard), keep playing!” Perfect analogy for what Trump does with these idiots, Fuji.

  14. peter miller says:

    The Dems know the investigation would be damaging so they create a poisonous tree scenario. The investigation and “skewed results” of the investigation occurred because of Trump coercion.
    They will say the Ukrainians produced false results to please Trump.

    • Well, they can “say” anything they please. The bottom line is that they’re guilty. The Americans treated Ukraine like a vassal state and stole tremendous amounts of money. The Ukrainians finally did something about it … and, so did we.

      • Mr e-man says:

        That stolen money surely made it’s way back into Democrat coffers.
        We give Ukraine money, they steal most of it to line their pockets, then they use parts of it to kickback to US officials in return for more money to Ukraine later. The US officials use the money to win elections and in return give more taxpayer money to Ukraine, for more kickbacks.
        It’s a scheme to have taxpayers unwittingly fund Democrat political campaigns. What a brilliant plan. Why go after individual donors when you see the big money?

  15. Troublemaker10 says:

    This changes everything about the context of that conversation.

    • Marina Sapir says:

      They had plans to reopen the investigation before Zelinsky was elected. But they did not reopen it before or after he was elected. How does it change anything?

      • Bryan Alexander says:

        You need to go back and listen to the video again. They don’t send out press releases that say “WE ARE RE-OPENING THE INVESTIGATION INTO BURISMA”. The paperwork and reports John Solomon presented indicates the investigations was re-opened, or they were/are attempting to re-open it in February of 2019.

        • Marina Sapir says:

          I read press. I read just recently that they are “planning” to investigate, if the investigation into Burisma was CLOSED properly. That is their official announcement, and that was published in FoxNews, I believe.
          So, the proper investigation into Burisma was not reopened.
          The investigation Solomon refers to, according to him, was already completed with the result: suspicion movement of money. That is it.
          There is no reason to celebrate.

      • donna kovacevic says:

        Polako Marina, slow down, with the skewed report you are trying so hard to convince us. I trust John and he has not been proven wrong to date, so your comment makes no sense unless you are trolling here. Sorry,

        • Marina Sapir says:

          What is polako? Never heard this word.
          His report is true.
          Yet, it means nothing important.
          Of course, I am trolling this posing: I disagree with the importance of the news.

          • donna kovacevic says:

            Polako is slowly, sorry I thought I mentioned it right after typing polako. If you disagree with John’s reporting then take it with a grain of salt, but don’t try to convince me and the rest to agree with you. We are here to listen, read all and then once all comes out we shall see the whole picture. I however have great respect for John and if he finds out more,he will report it. While all the MSM were flapping their wings from the start, John and Sara were as they say peeling back the onion. Sundance was the first of course. Have a great day.

          • willthesuevi says:

            It is “nothing important” to you.
            You obviously have a different objective and perspective than we do. Ukraine can do what they do.
            The timeline gives some vindication to our President. This is damn important to us.

  16. HardyBrooks says:

    Holy Shiite, now the democruds will have to back date everything again the blower heard from the local bath house stall, dammit!!! Can’t we find anything that will stick to the wall anymore? Get chuckie todd back on the batshiite phone and tell him to be more outrageous and have make up color him a darker red…….

    • donna kovacevic says:

      I find it amusing that the democrats think nothing of back dating, in the banking system where I live that was a huge NO NO. If one was caught back dating immediate dismissal of your job, no explanations whatsoever.

  17. ChampagneReady says:

    If Solomon and Guliani are not nominated for a Pulitzer, the award is rigged.

  18. William Moore says:

    But I thought Trump was being impeached. I was so counting on seeing lovely faces all over the media for the many months the proceedings will take. I just so much love to see and hear Nancy Pelosi, AOC, Maxine Waters, Rashiass Tliab, Chucky Scummer…Oh Darn. Now what will they do to get their putridity into our living rooms?

  19. Just like us, the Ukrainians were sick and tired of the (American …) corruption in their country, so they hired a fresh-faced and unconventional President who promised to “drain the swamp.”
    This time, the Americans don’t have anyone to give them six hours to fire him.
    Furthermore, Biden won’t be the only one they’re looking at. You can predict the other names: Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler … uh huh, every one of them had their dirty little fingers in the Ukrainian pie.

    • donna kovacevic says:

      Many find it strange that all this attention and money being sent to the Ukraine, even Canada sent so much money there. It should have been a red flag, after all Ukraine has been known for its corruption for decades if not more,. A poor primitive country and yet all this money and arms being sent, now we get it, a place for money laundering for the corrupt politicians outside Ukraine. Nobody cares about the people or the country, it is their own greedy pockets along with the corrupt politicians and their cohorts in this country called Ukraine.

    • 1987bear says:

      Supposedly S0r0s ran the hiring & firing in Ukraine, makes sense

  20. JimWVa says:

    If President Trump has right of representation of counsel and confrontation of witnesses in the House investigation, the following matters should be brought to light. The following link is a February 2017 press release from the Burisma Group corporate communications page. For context, then-VP Biden had the Ukraine Prosecutor General Shokin fired in March 2016. This report by a former Obama admin DOJ attorney is used by Biden to say “there is no there there.”

  21. Richard Simon says:

    For all you gamblers out there, wouldn’t you love to play poker with Dems?

  22. iRockie says:

    When will these people be held personally accountable?

  23. Tim Cunningham says:

    Was the investigation that opened in March of this year still ongoing at the end of July? And did the US Government know it was ongoing at that time? Those are the questions we need answers to.

  24. bullnuke says:

    The Whistleleaker was close to a 2020 candidate as pointed out by the ICIG. Which candidate would have a motive to characterize the phone call as awful, terrible and urgent? Obvious answer is Biden since he was mentioned on the call. No wonder they want that person never to be identified.

    • islandpalmtrees says:

      Are Sue Gordon and Dan Coats whistle-blower 1 & 2?
      Were the new whistle-blower forms filled out in advance of their leaving/retirement?
      Did Schiff wait until the time was right before releasing complaints?
      Is this why Atkinson refused to provide any explanation to lawmakers of what had happen?
      Would Joe Biden known Sue Gordon?

  25. dufrst says:

    They say it doesn’t matter because that was under the former president of Ukraine and not the current one and that it was already reported in the NYTimes in May.
    So, this is just another piece to confirm that there was legit reasons to investigate Joe Biden on corruption but it doesn’t totally clear our VSG (or completely make his opponents look like absolute idiots as I wld say).

  26. Devil in the Blue Drapes says:

    Wait just a gosh darn minute. Joe is on the stump today calling for Trump to be impeached.
    All things being equal, shouldn’t Joe be investigated for Obstruction?
    Mueller? Mueller? We’re gonna need another 2 year, 40mil SC investigation.

  27. Elle says:

    The coup plotters made the mistake of believing their own press (pun intended) and that the American people are stupid. They just continued on as if no one could see what they were doing. I expect we will see many of the second and third tier players like Rice, Yates, Lynch, Clapper, Brennan etc. starting to publicly turn on each other now. The other bit players will begin to abandon ship as they realize resistance is not only futile but hazardous to their own well being.

  28. snellvillebob says:

    Remember how Andrew McCabe got off by threatening the entire intelligence community? Well, the urgency of this impeachment might be because Joe Biden has threatened the entire DNC and obama. It worked so well for McCabe that old Joe is trying it. Of course, I have nothing to back this up but my faith that Democrats are evil.

  29. islandpalmtrees says:

    Counting down, 9 days to the FISA abuse report release.

  30. islandpalmtrees says:

    Will Biden turn states evidence and tell us what Obama and Hillary Clinton was doing or should say being paid for?
    BREAKING: Burisma Holdings Paid Joe Biden $900,000 For Lobbying Activities: Ukrainian MP
    Cristina Laila by Cristina Laila October 9, 2019
    New documents unearthed by award-winning investigative reporter John Solomon destroyed the Democrat narrative that Trump strong-armed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
    The new documents show that Ukraine was reopening the investigation into Burisma and the crooked Bidens back in February — before Zelensky was elected president

    • Mr e-man says:

      Also, that information was from open source documents that had been collected by our intelligence agencies. That also means Trump already knew they were investigating. That also means Trump wasn’t ASKING them to investigate Biden. He already knew they were.

  31. TarsTarkas says:

    The Spin is going to be that Trump was colluding and conspiring with the Ukrainians back in February . . .

  32. vernondosier says:

    I can proudly say that John Soloman, Sara Carter, and Sundance were the three JOURNALISTS most responsible for my red-pilling. Thank God for the courageous truth seekers for who, without them and others, there would be many more sheep walking amongst us.
    I was blind, but now I see.

  33. Bill says:

    Read article in real clear investigations regarding Ukraine Bidens, Kerry. If notes are true, this may eventually lead to Obama…

Comments are closed.