Representative Chris Stewart (R-Utah) of the House Intelligence Committee debates the insufferable Chris Wallace over the issues of corruption in the swamp.
Obviously the tradition of politicians selling their office for financial gain political hits a nerve with Wallace who must defend the practice in order to defend the swamp. The level of pearl-clutching pretzel logic by Wallace is off-the-charts…. In essence, all corruption must be accepted while politicians are running for office.
 | WES on Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Pl… |
 | Republicanvet91 on White House Responds to Nadler… |
 | Charles Stephens on White House Responds to Nadler… |
 | H.R. on White House Responds to Nadler… |
 | datagooroo on White House Responds to Nadler… |
 | pucecatt on White House Responds to Nadler… |
 | Robert Smith on White House Responds to Nadler… |
 | Road Runner on President Trump Puts “Te… |
 | livefreeordieguy on Report: Six Saudi Nationals Ar… |
 | armie on White House Responds to Nadler… |
 | Sentient on MAGAnomics – November Jo… |
 | bullnuke on White House Responds to Nadler… |
 | Dutchman on Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Pl… |
| bullnuke on White House Responds to Nadler… |
 | Dekester on White House Responds to Nadler… |
Treehouse Poet Laureate
I can’t stomach even one minute of a Wallace any more.
LikeLiked by 31 people
Me neither.
LikeLiked by 7 people
Abominations like the “0bama presidency” would not have been possible without media scumbags like Wallace…
LikeLiked by 22 people
Very true.
LikeLiked by 4 people
The media is far more powerful than Americans generally realize, and more powerful than the DC Swamp dwellers acknowledge
LikeLiked by 6 people
Can’t Any Longer…
CAN’T ANY LONGER!!
LikeLiked by 3 people
In a world of true Justice, Wallace would visit London, stroll out of a restaurant after a good meal… and be found in the morning next to the ghost of Roberto Calvi, hanging from a bridge over the Thames. The Globalist schillings still in his pockets.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Mr Peabody needs to join the other ladies on the view. Also take Shepard Smithers Smith along for the ride. EXCELLENT!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
this creature -Wallace- is more annoying than -presstitutes in my former socialist /commie homeland…
LikeLiked by 7 people
Where was that? Massachusetts?
LikeLiked by 3 people
behind-iron certain..…..
LikeLike
He is obviously quite corrupt himself and is taking the anti-corruption efforts as a personal attack.
LikeLiked by 5 people
He is judas 2.0.Idon t watch fox too much other then dobbs,pirro,hannity ,carlson and ingram.chrissy like his daddy before him is one of the most disgusting and despicable weasels on .
LikeLiked by 2 people
what took you so long?
LikeLike
Agreed 1000%
This congressman did an excellent job although I wish he too would highlight the bias of swamp creature Wallace
LikeLiked by 1 person
Chris Wallace is as much of a fresh steaming turd as his old man was. Was present when he conducted an interview for 60 minutes. When I watched the interview I was astonished to see that he had literally spliced together answers to given to questions that were not aired with entirely different questions aired on the show.
LikeLike
WHY…….it’s Bagdad Bob Wallace to the rescue…..such an entertaining crash and burn for all to see!
It is good to see the “corruption” word getting a work-out during these timely days of Oct…
Wonder what ‘ol Chrissy would do if someone just pulled out a grenade, pulled the pin, and tossed it over to him with a smile….eh?… Check-6
LikeLiked by 8 people
What Wallace just put up says about investigating 2016… the democrat media love to conflate the investigation of 2016 with investigating Biden,
WHOA,
UNLESS THIS IS A TACIT ADMISSION that the investigation of 2016 will necessarily, include BIDEN. eek!
LikeLiked by 7 people
Excellent interview. Did not have the yelling that turns off so many people. Gets the message out.
The media is getting bruised this weekend. Feel the pain.
LikeLiked by 13 people
It was a surprisingly good interview! Chris Wallace can be insufferable but Rep. Chris Stewart held his own and then some.
LikeLiked by 7 people
They always underestimate the quiet ones.
Rep Stewart first flew rescue choppers, then became a B1-B bomber pilot.
Surprising, huh?
LikeLiked by 4 people
Yes I totally agree!
Wallace tried hard to push The Narrative but Rep. Chris Stewart did an outstanding and commendable job holding fast to the truth and swatting down Wallace’s insistence on yielding to DemonRAT talking points.
I was a bit surprised at Wallace’s relative civility here and at Stewart’s steady calm demeanor (I cannot remember watching him in any previous interviews) while just obliterating the Insufferable One’s attempted Gotcha! line of attack.
LikeLiked by 1 person
President Trump is well within the scope of his role to inquire with the president of Ukraine. Chris Wallace is an idiot trying to cover this up. He says there’s no specific allegation against the Biden Crime Family.
There’s a damn videotape in the public domain of Joe Biden extorting money out of Ukraine. These are some very sick, twisted people who will lie right to the faces of Americans in order to protect major corruption and this is not a close call.
How pathetic are these DNC Media tools?
LikeLiked by 18 people
Pro-tip: You don’t get an Ivy League degree — a non-technical degree at any rate — without figuring out the political lay of the land and saying what your commie professors want to hear. These swamp dwellers have been trained to prevaricate for pay since their teens — if not many years before…
LikeLiked by 4 people
What Wallace just put up says about investigating 2016… the democrat media love to conflate the investigation of 2016 with investigating Biden,
WHOA,
UNLESS THIS IS A TACIT ADMISSION that the investigation of 2016 will necessarily, include BIDEN. eek!
LikeLiked by 3 people
Go back through the 2016 Spygate treason timeline. Biden was there for every meeting. Of course 2016 includes Biden.
LikeLike
I started to watch this video then after about 45 seconds I asked myself if I knew the direction Wallace would take and how the guest would respond…
In other words, I left the video quickly knowing it was a waste of my time and would do nothing but irate me. Wallace is such a disappointment in so many ways, as if Fox as they move more to the left side of the aisle in presenting perspectives.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You should have watched. IMO.
LikeLiked by 5 people
It was good; the Senator did a terrific job. He stayed cool, calm, and collected and kept repeating his points.
LikeLiked by 6 people
oops..I mean Congressman; sorry, I also watched Senator Johnson’s interview with Chuck Todd….that was pretty horrific.
LikeLiked by 3 people
It was a good interview. Stewart was solid. Wallace looked like the hack he’s become.
LikeLiked by 5 people
Recommend you go back and watch it to the end.
It’s worth the few minutes to see and hear Rep. Stewart’s cool-handed and excellent swat-down of Wallace’s DemonRAT Talking Points and Narrative.
Stewart handles Wallace like an old pro. I think by the end Wallace knows he’s been beaten fair and square in this little debate.
LikeLike
Ok, I’ve read the responses to your earlier thoughts and did in fact go back and watch the entire video of Congressman Stewart with the ever popular and oh so fair dynamo Chris Wallace.
Stewart certainly did hold down his side, presented his thoughts in a coherent manner, and rightly frustrated the oh so sneaky Wallace! You were right to suggest I view the video in its entirety. Thank you for this nudging.
I also wish to point out that the Congressman had a great knot in his tie, centered right on the money with the fine white dress shirt. I also noticed what appears to be naval pilot wings on his left lapel…got to love that!
Wallace still makes me sick!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Don’t listen to these other guys telling you that you should have watched. You know your own mind, and how much you know about the dysfunction in Washington by now. I’m even stopping reading these comments here, I’ve read enough.
For the record, thanks to Sundance for a great lineup of posts this morning/last evening. Way to focus.
LikeLike
YOU MEAN WALLASS????
LikeLike
Great job by the Congressman Stewart!
LikeLiked by 7 people
Yes–the Congressman dealt with Wallace very well ! I was impressed——some GOP fight back today! Both he and Sen. Ron Johnson ! KUDOS
LikeLiked by 3 people
Chris Wallace is a lying skid mark on the soul of our nation! He flat out lies and said that it has been “corroborated” that Giuliani both before and after the POTUS July Ukraine call, along with POTUS linked military aid to an investigation of Biden. First, Rudy has repeated stated that he stop his investigation in March before Joe announced. Next, scumbag then reads texts and leaves out the text that says absolutely no quid pro quo allowed by POTUS. Wallace is a disgrace to journalism and acts like he works for corrupt CNN.
LikeLiked by 8 people
Wallace would fit right in at 60 Minutes. where truth overrules facts.
LikeLike
Maybe that’s the gig is he after. Just polishing his resume at Fox.
LikeLiked by 2 people
The only thing Wallace is polishing is a turd. And he’s not been all that successful. His interviewing agenda still stinks…like a turd.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Well look, Chrissy is convinced that he can pick up a turd by the clean end, and is determined to prove that to the world. Good luck with that…..
LikeLike
At his age of 72 Wallace should be submitting his resume for retirement.
LikeLike
are you sure it’s “truth”?
… just checkin’
LikeLike
Also, they leave out the context of Bill Taylor’s text. His Sept. 9th text, “I think its crazy to withhold military aid for a political campaign” was his reaction after reading the August 28th Politico article about aid being withheld from Ukraine (which was leaked by Schiff). Taylor and Yermack of the Ukraine were questioning the article, per Volker.
LikeLike
Sundland answered, no the President has been very clear, there will be no quid pro quo.
Butt “conveniently” left that out.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is just fine to write your words here.
But have you written or called Fox to let them know your thoughts?
Fox no longer reads my emails nor takes my calls.
Your turn.
LikeLike
Sure did!
LikeLike
Junior Wallace is a banner representative of the U.S. news media. They are all shills for the progressive/socialist left. There are no laws or ethics that will turn them. They and their political friends are shielded from all that is right.
Nothing can be done about any of them — that is except keeping President Donald J. Trump in office for the next five years. And that means going to war, if that’s what they want.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Stewart did a great job. Calm ,direct, cutting down all of Wallace’s arguments.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Rep Stewart is a soft spoken and sympathetic character …….looks mean-spirited when you attack him. He disarmed Wallace IMO.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I wish someone in the White House would remind the press that there is absolutely NOTHING wrong with making “quid pro quo” deals with foreign nations so long as the “pro quo” is a service to our national interest, such as our national interest in criminal justice.
If Trump did what Biden did, if he insisted on a particular criminal justice verdict rather than a legitimate truth-seeking due process as a condition for aid, THAT could be an abuse of power. Biden seems to have used quid pro quo to ELIMINATE proper due process and that ought to be investigated.
It is only quid that are in exchange for abusive pro quos that are improper. Every trade deal is a list of quid pro quos committed to writing, signed and ratified. The idea that there is something wrong with making deals, where what we give is conditional on what we get, is insane and any attempt to enforce that view by Congress would be a glaring violation of the president’s Article II powers.
LikeLiked by 6 people
Chrissy keeps talking about people doing business with China and I he Ukraine. What he fails to mention is Quidprojoe is he wasn’t a business man. He was VP!!! Migh be a little different.
And I agree. Chrissy is an ass of the first degree.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Forgive my spelling. I was a bit riled up. Hopefully you get my point.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Excellent point. I was thinking the same exact thought as I listened to Wallace attempt to make that point to Stewart.
I was maybe a tad bit disappointed Stewart did not jump on that remark and call Wallace out “Geez Chris, do you realize what you just said? Businessmen? Chris, businessmen making deals aren’t trying to sell access to their high government office Congress or the White House to influence of U.S. foreign policy. Do you understand the difference? Holy cow!”
LikeLike
And Chrissy is friends with Rush. I’ll never get that.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Wallace gives him respect he doesn’t give any others on our side.
LikeLike
Rush has been very critical of FNC recently, I wonder if he listens to the Wallace show since it is well-known, at least to Rush listeners, that he appears on it annually.
LikeLike
I get it. Not being a Rush fan I believe that he, just like the politicos he criticizes is in it for himself first and foremost. Oh he may be saying the right things, but don’t forget he was a never Trumper. His talent is talk I give him that. The few times I listened to him I found that some of his callers sound more forthright and smarter than he is.
LikeLike
Sorry that’s just patently false.
Rush was NEVER a NeverTrumper. You can search his archives of transcripts of his radio shows back in 2015 and he was fascinated and supportive of Trump (while not endorsing DJT or anyone running in the primaries) pretty much from the beginning.
In fact, here is proof…the day Trump rode down the escalator:
https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2015/06/16/trump_s_message_will_resonate/
LikeLiked by 1 person
So, the democrats in the press will not look closely at dem politicians who are obviously corrupt? If the corrupt Hillary Clinton was held accountable in the press for her illegal server, we would’ve been spared the spectacle of her candidacy and the convolution of justice to save her from indictment in 2016.
Do the Democrats really want to run corrupt Joe Biden in 2020?Go for it. He used his political position to get money from a foreign government for his kid. Is that what they want? Someone they know is corrupt.
Trump is clean and he’s creating jobs. People are not stupid.
LikeLiked by 4 people
The Biden thing is a distraction. The key thing is the investigation into 2016 meddling.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And that’s why they keep talking about Biden. They know it’s a distraction, but they haven’t figured out that we know it too.
LikeLike
Special Representative to Ukraine Kurt Volker admits that that he pressured Ukraine NOT to investigate Biden. Why is he getting a pass for this? He even brags in his testimony to Congress that he thinks his advice/warning actually did have the effect of stopping Ukraine from investigating Biden:
“To the best of my knowledge, no such actions by Ukraine were ever taken, at least in part, I believe, because of the advice I gave them.”
Imagine if Volker had warned Ukraine not to investigate evidence of wrongdoing by President Trump, or by Don Jr.! Impeachment would be a slam dunk, likely in the Senate as well as the House, but because it is a Democrat Volker was protecting from Ukrainian law enforcement this is somehow okay?
If Volker is right that her blocked Ukraine from investigating Biden then he is the whole reason Trump had to say anything to Ukraine about Biden at all. He presents himself as trying to convince the Trump administration that Ukraine had turned the corner and was no longer besotted by anti-Trump political corruption but his actual actions militated very strongly in the opposite direction.
Trump was clearly wondering why the hell Ukraine was not investigating the obvious indications of massive political corruption by the Bidens, which must have been one of the reasons he suspected them of still being in the tank for the Democrats, but it wasn’t actually the Ukrainians who were responsible for this particular bit of corruption, it was Volker! By his own admission, his own sworn testimony!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Wallace: “Can you name one other instance when the President asked for the investigation of another American?” Answer: “No, the President’s phone calls are classified. We wouldn’t know about this one if there wasn’t a second-hand whistleblower with TDS. Can you tell us, Chris, how many times Obama promised flexibility to world leaders, other than Putin?”
LikeLiked by 8 people
“Wallace: Can you name one other instance when the President asked for the investigation……” Ans: well maybe, 33,000 times President Putin, about emails from our Secretary of State (ex) named Hillary….?.? Can you help us look into that?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Congressman Stewart was brilliant in this interview: understated, on-point, incisive, at all times occupying the highground of reason, honesty and truth!
Many thanks, Congressman
LikeLiked by 1 person
Couldn’t agree more!!’ Stewart was great!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wallace was again beaten in debate. Sundance correctly labels him as insufferable. Someone else on the thread appropriately calls Wallace a skidmark, which provides a decent depiction of the measure of Wallace’s role in the major battle at hand.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Chris Weasel’s voice could be sold on a little tape recorder as an emetic.
LikeLiked by 1 person
they all forget to use the best line, all purpose line to answer these questions, “What difference, at this point, does it make?”
LikeLiked by 1 person
there is 16 min between the question asked of Sondland and the , “call me” — how dishonest is that to put them as if they are consecutive.
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLiked by 6 people
❤ it!
LikeLike
Okay… That made me laugh.
LikeLike
Priceless!
🤣
LikeLike
sounded like chrissy and stephie had a phoncall this morning…you know, just to get on the same page…or is script?
LikeLike
Trying to get a sound bite. Lordy they’re sad little men.
LikeLike
Butt Wallace is beneath contempt.
LikeLike
Wallace is a bigot
LikeLike
After seeing all three of the Media vs. Republican vids posted here today, I am just sickened. All of those “journalists” are narrative-pushing intelligence operatives and will have to be hanged for this coup.
LikeLike
smarty Jones, you rightly stated
“He says there is no specific allegation against the Biden Crime Family.”
My response to that: “That’s a problem and what we’ve been saying. Thank you for the reminder. We’ll add it to the list of Democraps that need prosecuted.”
LikeLike
Wow – Representative Chris Stewart made a Chris Wallace interview tolerable, possibly even enjoyable.
Rep. Stewart went off topic & pointed out that Dems are not sad “impeaching” President Trump, they are giddy.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Honestly, I think I see a bit of Wallace’s strategy … and it might not be quite what you think. He argues, represents, the position that the opponent takes, and circles incessantly back to it just as the opponent does. But this is not quite the same thing – from a journalistic point of view – as taking the position himself.
Nonetheless, the position is untenable. If you are the country’s chief law enforcement officer, it does not matter who the criminal is. The fact that you are the President or the Vice-President not only “does not excuse” such blatant criminality, but makes it all the more intolerable. “Washington, DC” does not now think that way, but the American People most certainly do.
As Wallace repeatedly circled back to that untenable position, again and again and again, using the exact “justifications” that we hear continuously, he portrayed this. But might this be … acting?
What do you think?
LikeLike