White House Trade Advisor Peter Navarro Discusses Status of U.S-China Conflict…

White House trade and manufacturing policy advisor Peter Navarro, appears with Lou Dobbs to discuss the current status of the U.S.-China trade conflict.

Within the interview Navarro discusses the impact of China devaluing their currency as a strategy to avoid U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports.  WATCH:

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Auto Sector, Big Government, China, Communist, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Donald Trump, Economy, Hong Kong, media bias, NAFTA, President Trump, Trade Deal, Uncategorized, US dept of agriculture, US Treasury, USA, USMCA. Bookmark the permalink.

69 Responses to White House Trade Advisor Peter Navarro Discusses Status of U.S-China Conflict…

  1. dufrst says:

    More good stuff

    Liked by 4 people

    • The Deplorable Tina says:

      Exactly my thought! Bought some SIRI today 😊

      Liked by 2 people

    • GB Bari says:

      Only Michael Lee (man on the left end) was bringing “the good stuff” and he was spot on and it was good.

      But in true present-day Fox tradition, Dagan and the others on that panel were throwing as much cold water on his optimism as they could find, and their counterpoints were all very weak sauce, IMO.

      Liked by 5 people

    • Schmitty says:

      My humble opinion, this is the end of decade run-up like 1919, 1929, 1979,1999… i bought a ton of JNUG end of May when XAU Index was under 70 (closed 87% of time higher than 66.4 since late 1983) and sold my house (closed sale on June 20th). In my humble opinion this is a repeat of 1919-1921 market crash/correction. I am renting a condo with my wife and kids (like Noah & the ark – lol), and will buy back into housing market in March-June of 2021… it’s a lot of cash yes… but i believe we gold sky-rockets into late 2021 and housing drops like a rock along with markets. I love Jesus Christ and Trump as much as the next warm blooded mid 30 year old. God bless America but at the same time “a wise man sees a storm and hides himself, a fool bears the brunt of it’s destruction”, i humbly don’t want to be that fool (as so many times i have been).

      Liked by 2 people

  2. TarsTarkas says:

    For all those buying product made in China . . .

    Merry Xmas!

    For all those not . . .

    Merry Xmas!

    Liked by 2 people

  3. sDee says:

    Dobbs: “we don’t see the Chinese making a lot of sense here”

    The globalists will never let the Chinese make a deal that, in anyway, aids in reversing the extraction of American wealth and manufacturing.

    That would make China of no value to them – they would not care if it implodes .

    Liked by 2 people

  4. Brant says:

    Visible tipping point of China might be when they start pulling back from these international agreements in ports and places that overextend their supply lines and funds.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Brant says:

      It also seems various people are starting to see the genius of the actions. Like every step was planned and it was known what China would do at each step. Trump is the puppeteer to them.

      Liked by 4 people

      • KingBroly says:

        Most definitely. But you’re also seeing those who are increasingly on China’s side. Time to bail on them I think. This includes Big Tech and Hollywood.

        Liked by 3 people

        • wilski says:

          CNBC needs to drape, as a programming background, the flag of the country their “financial experts” support:the Chi-Coms.
          These are the “experts” that kept saying US GNP maximum is 1.5% during Comrade BHO’s reign; the “New Normal”.

          Liked by 3 people

    • And that Brant is why China has bought as many ports as possible ALL along our shores…AND THE PANAMA CANAL…That was first. it was done with the money from these globalists and now, the globalists are trying to stop the freight train (China) from going over the cliff. Kinda like the movie, “Thelma & Louise”…I will let you pick which one is the “globalists”!!!

      Liked by 2 people

  5. Zippy says:

    See graph at link. Involves $5.9 billion, a pittance. Subsidize our agricultural sector losses until they find another market.

    China confirms it is suspending agricultural product purchases in response to Trump’s new tariffs
    PUBLISHED 2 HOURS AGO UPDATED 38 MIN AGO

    https://www.cnbc.com/2019/08/05/china-confirms-it-is-suspending-agricultural-product-purchases-in-response-to-trumps-new-tariffs.html

    “U.S. farming has been a hot-button issue in the ongoing trade war. The president said that he had secured large quantities of agricultural purchases when he met with President Xi Jinping at the G-20 summit in June. Trump later accused China of not following through, leading him to announce on Thursday 10% tariffs on the remaining $300 billion in Chinese imports.”

    Meanwhile, the GARBAGE from globalists:

    China Is Cutting Tariffs—For Everyone Else
    As Trump focuses on disruption, Beijing is evidently operating on a higher level.
    JUN 18, 2019
    Chad P. Bown – Senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics

    https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/06/chinas-two-pronged-trade-war/591877/

    I looked them up:

    About the Peterson Institute for International Economics

    https://www.piie.com/about-piie

    “Current priorities include:

    – truth telling about the benefits of globalization and the costs of closed economies;”

    Liked by 3 people

  6. The Boss says:

    EXCELLENT bitch slap delivered to Chris Wallace for his pathetic hyping of the useless Goldman Sachs chart yesterday. I’m sure Lou could care less.

    Liked by 15 people

  7. 335blues says:

    Can it be any more obvious?
    C of C and Goldman Sachs are playing on the communist chinese team.
    GIVE ‘EM HELL!
    Raise the tariffs again, now!

    Liked by 8 people

  8. A2 says:

    👇👇👇👇

    _xing_rubi
    @_xing_rubi

    This is the key piece and what most people miss.

    Devaluation is not about increasing the EXPORT of goods. It is about increasing the IMPORT of dollars.

    In our global economy, the capital and financial channel overwhelms the trade channel.”

    👍👍👍

    Liked by 4 people

    • H.R. says:

      “Devaluation is not about increasing the EXPORT of goods. It is about increasing the IMPORT of dollars.”

      Yes and no, A2. If they want dollars, they have to export and run the tariff gantlet to get the dollars, all the while they are shipping the same amount of goods and getting fewer dollars.

      So yes, it’s about importing dollars, but no, they will slowly sink beneath the waves as they are doing now. I’m not seeing how they can increase the import of dollars.

      Liked by 1 person

      • A2 says:

        It’s a ‘key’ piece that most people miss. And we are talking about China. Not every market tariffs their goods. But you knew that. The argument just points to the problem. Need more dollars.

        China is already taking a step back on their devaluation today because the spread in theCNY/CNH is too great, they obviously will not allow their currency to float and they can’t let the RMB continue to nosedive.

        “China’s central bank to sell yuan bills in Hong Kong ”
        https://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN1UW03I?__twitter_impression=true

        Liked by 1 person

        • H.R. says:

          I wasn’t disagreeing, A2, just refining your point a bit. And you bring it on home with your response: “Need more dollars.” and “[…] they can’t let the RMB continue to nosedive.”

          P.S. I greatly appreciate your “boots on the ground” reports and analyses. I can’t use the ‘Like’ button, so I’m taking the opportunity now to say “Thanks” and make up a bit for my missing ‘Likes’.

          Like

  9. Lee Moore says:

    STFU Dobbs and let your interviewee speak.

    Liked by 7 people

  10. OhNoYouDont says:

    @ 10:15 of interview

    Navarro ” Goldman Sachs … is the the commander and chief of Wall Street of offshoring. Full stop.”

    Liked by 7 people

  11. A2 says:

    👇👇👇

    Keerthik Sasidharan
    @KS1729
    “A good thread. To complement, some observations
    [if you’ve been in China macro, none of this is unknown]

    1. Nearly (~$1.5 trillion?, per Daiwa) of external debt potentially missing. Borrowings in HK/NY/Sing etc. Not in official figures of “external” debt, $ converted to CNY.

    2. Capital control has made CNY —> USD difficult, which typically means rolling the dollar debt.

    3. There was a carry trade of sorts in play. For a while, local firms borrowed in dollar, invested locally. Remember, a while ago rate spreads b/w dollar and CNY was 3-5% and CNY was generally seen as likely to appreciate. That came to an end.

    4. Reverse carry trade, if it picks up, as it did in 2014-16s — the capital outflow likely to worsen the CNY.

    4. Belt & Road exacerbated $ debt. China borrowed in $, lent it to Asia/Africa/LAmericas — as a conduit to transfer from global $ to these weak macro countries earning a spread (~ geopolitical clout + returns). If these countries default/renege, China’s $ debt burden spikes.

    5. Then there is the question of how is China’s FX Reserves calculated, particularly as fake transactions due to CNY inflows are supposedly rife resulting in high % of “hot” money… Reserves backed by real flows + long term FDI is most likely smaller.

    6. 2020 is the Year of Repayment. This means buying dollars in foreign exchange markets or using PBOC’s FX reserves. Latter is unlikely, so buying dollar will result in CNY pressed further down…

    7. As the Chinese curse: “may you live in interesting times”. Well, interesting times are here…”

    Liked by 2 people

  12. Brant says:

    I wonder how many times Trump told Xi from the very start how things were going to happen and Xi totally ignored him. Trump probably told him every step he would do and then told Xi what he knew Xi would do in response. It’s probably happened like clock work.

    Liked by 6 people

  13. oahu_dawg says:

    Lou Dobbs and Charles Payne are the business and economics news heroes of Fox News.

    Liked by 7 people

  14. FreedomLover says:

    Now that there was just plain old funny! Best laugh I’ve had today. Bringing up that totally screwy graph multiple times, slamming Goldman Sachs. Slamming Wallace. Love it.

    Liked by 7 people

  15. Fools Gold says:

    This one is a long term keeper IMHO. The swampbis the swamp and hide under the moss but stick their head up up every now and then. Makes perfect targets for an accurate .22 shot…

    Liked by 1 person

  16. jeans2nd says:

    Cannot help but think Dr Navarro is having a wee bit schadenfreude re: Weasel Wallace’s attack on Dr Navarro yesterday.
    Wallace, how do you like your crow? We prefer it Rare, but Wallace obviously likes it Over-Done.

    One is left with the distinct feeling that after the GOPe’s Janus move re: Rep Ratcliff/DNI, Pres Trump has withdrawn into his very small circle of advisers, i.e. his family and teeny group of trusted econ advisers. Kuddly Kudlow has been noticeably absent today, but our attack wolverines Navarro and Moore are both front and center. Heck, even Bannon surfaced publicly yesterday.

    Liked by 5 people

    • TwoLaine says:

      Bannon’s out and about all the time. Weekend before last he did the Symposium at the Wall. Fabulous event. Video at Right Side Network on youtube.

      Like

  17. curator55 says:

    CNBC—”Big Tech lost $162 billion in value in Monday’s market rout, led by plunge in Apple”
    —-The broader market had its worst day of 2019, as trade tensions heated up between the U.S. and China.
    —-The rout started on Friday, when tech’s big five lost a combined $66 billion in market cap.

    Liked by 1 person

  18. Jan PT says:

    We need a new tariff system:
    1) punitive tariffs, if needed, politically based
    2) currency manipulation compensatory tariffs (self-explanatory)
    3) ecological tariffs (if we are undercut by dirty production saving costs)
    4) slavery tariffs (if wages are ludicrously low)
    We would now have 10-25% tariff 1 on Chinese products, another 10-20 for devaluation, tariff 3 I have no idea, say 10%? And China using NK slaves is a no-go, another 10-20% would be in order.
    That would be max 75%, min 40%.
    Sounds good to me.

    Like

  19. Gary Lacey says:

    Chris Wallace insisted the Graph was from the Labor Dept,…..Wallace lied….the graph was from Goldman Sacs.

    I don’t watch G-D Liars!

    Liked by 2 people

  20. TwoLaine says:

    Give ’em hell Peter!

    Like

  21. steph_gray says:

    A side note on Lou’s show: Because I don’t have cable and have to find it online to stream, I looked for the several instances of it on youtube today, as I do every weekday, one day late.

    They are always cut from full length, sometimes full of ads, sometimes include only half the show repeated twice, that sort of thing.

    Today’s omission was rather interesting, though. Lou teased a segment about Google’s election interference. Every single instance of the show I could find cut off before that segment.

    Things that make you go hmmmmmmm…. 🧐🤨

    (And if anyone knows of another streaming source for Fox Biz shows other than Google-owned YT, please let me know!)

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s