Evelyn Farkas Attempts To Explain – Only Digs Hole Further…

Mrs. Evelyn Farkas appeared on a Boston am news broadcast to explain her previous March 2nd comments about leaking intelligence information, gathered by the Obama administration, to “people on the Hill”.

Today’s attempt to obfuscate her prior revealing commentary is demonstrably false against the actual words she used in her prior statements.  Here’s her attempt at deflection along with the prior transcript of her words on MSNBC:

When you review her actual statements to MSNBC you can see how weak her current denials are:

“I was urging my former colleagues, and, and frankly speaking the people on the Hill [Democrat politicians], it was more actually aimed at telling the Hill people, get as much information as you can – get as much intelligence as you can – before President Obama leaves the administration.”

“Because I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior [Obama] people who left; so it would be hidden away in the bureaucracy, um, that the Trump folks – if they found out HOW we knew what we knew about their, the Trump staff, dealing with Russians – that they would try to compromise those sources and methods; meaning we no longer have access to that intelligence.”

“So I became very worried because not enough was coming out into the open and I knew that there was more. We have very good intelligence on Russia; so then I had talked to some of my former colleagues and I knew that they were also trying to help get information to [Democrat politicians].  That’s why you had the leaking.”

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Big Government, Conspiracy ?, Cyber Security, Dem Hypocrisy, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, Election 2016, media bias, Notorious Liars, NSA, President Trump, Professional Idiots, Spying, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

229 Responses to Evelyn Farkas Attempts To Explain – Only Digs Hole Further…

  1. JoAnn Leichliter says:

    Congress had no legal right to review these intercepts, unless the Americans involved were masked. So…what is she actually saying? Not what she thinks. You can talk about what the “Russians” say and that’s it–unless there is a warrant to collect on the American (s). Maybe I am wrong here?

    Like

  2. susiejo says:

    The author of this piece was involved in exposing the Iran/Contra Scandal. He is highly respected as an investigative journalist.

    The Sleazy Origins of Russia-gate
    March 29, 2017

    Exclusive: Official Washington’s groupthink is that Russian “disinformation” helped elect Donald Trump, but the evidence is actually much stronger that Russian “dirt” was helping Hillary Clinton, reports Robert Parry.

    https://consortiumnews.com/2017/03/29/the-sleazy-origins-of-russia-gate/

    Like

  3. mike diamond says:

    THE RUSSIANS???????give us a break miss farkas,she knows the obama folks made so many bad deals with iran,and other mid east places,and they never respected our good friend ISRAEL !!!!!! she new that when trump and his people took over they would see all the bad deals obama made so they came up with this fake news russian stuff to cover and hide!!!!!

    Like

  4. tampa2 says:

    I posted this earlier, but seemingly disappeared. As Clinton Campaign’s senior foreign policy advisor, was Evelyn Farkas assigned the the Clinton “White House Transition Coordination Council”? This would clearly explain her continued access to intel, no?

    http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/279037-president-obama-takes-first-steps-toward-preparing-successor

    Like

  5. Buck Turgidson says:

    Fargas is SO BUSTED

    Like

  6. Chewbarkah says:

    “…that the Trump folks – if they found out HOW we knew what we knew about their, the Trump staff, dealing with Russians – that they would try to compromise those sources and methods; meaning we no longer have access to that intelligence.”

    Farkas’s plan to stop this: Promulgate all the secret anti-Trump intel she believes to exist throughout Congress and leak hints to the media. Uh — Congress being a sieve and all, wouldn’t that be guaranteed to compromise all sources and methods associated with it? She has no evidence that sinister Trumpites would compromise the sources and methods; she merely speculates that they MIGHT. To forestall the speculative possibility of compromise by Trumpites later, she claims she pushed for the dead certainty of compromise now.

    If Farkas, a former high official in the DoD, actually believes this makes sense, God help us. If it is a lie to cover for the Dems’ criminal misuse of government intel resources for dirty tricks and influencing a presidential election, she is the worst spin-doctor in history.

    Like

  7. sadly, i believe that the intellectually lobotomized public is so inurred to the criminal conduct of the democRATs that nothing will come of this smoking gun admission on live tv and of course the vile alphabet media will run cover for the devils of the hussein-obama administration. The unsettling truth is that the young democratic socialists of america will NOT rest until Civil War is once again a reality, not between North and South this time but Left and Right. Let the bugle calls sound once more across the American plains

    Like

  8. Txfella says:

    Pssssssst- Evelyn! Drop the shovel! (or don’t!)

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s