Audio quality challenging. Turn your speakers way up. Pay close attention when they get to the @2:00 point.
…”she was the last one”…
D’oh
Audio quality challenging. Turn your speakers way up. Pay close attention when they get to the @2:00 point.
D’oh
The number of people throughout this nation who can understand exactly what the issues are within this video would not fill a standard college lecture hall. Lucky for us, they are all reading this site. So y’all are in very good company.
Then, as I was going to delete the post, it occurred to me that even in victory it actually still applies.
Why?
Well the structure of what I had written was about the aspects never presented to the jury. What I realized in reading it yesterday, was it still applies – only this time with modifications to explain why the viewing public had such a negative outcome to the verdict.
In essence, the same reason(s) the jury could have found George guilty, is the very same reason(s) the public is unable to accept his acquittal.
FIRST: Mark O’Mara spent 4 minutes of silence to prove what exactly?
Sure, the implication was that Trayvon should have made it home; But he never actually said that directly, instead he just implied it was a possibility. Which “implies” Trayvon could have hidden around laying in wait for the “creepy ass cracka” to show up. But again he never actually presented the basis for Trayvon provoking the encounter. (more…)
Pucker up – Here we go. Smoke em’ fast and fix bayonets, because we are fixin’ to join Team Ben full-on Wolverine against the SAO in Jacksonville Florida. Ben’s attorney, former State Prosecutor, Wes White, fires a flare shot based on last nights HLN interview.

Ms. Corey:
You and Mr. de la Rionda have violated your oaths of office and denigrated the very Constitution you swore to uphold and defend. You have assailed and undermined both the right to trial by jury and the finality and dignity associated with a jury verdict.
For you to label George Zimmerman, an acquitted defendant, as a “murderer” at this juncture is reprehensible and irresponsible, can only breed contempt for our system of justice and the rule of law, and may very well lead to civil unrest. For Mr. de la Rionda, to suggest that exercising one’s 5th Amendment privilege lacks courage (by not testifying as a defendant in a criminal trial) belittles and demeans a sacred constitutional right.
It is time for you both to step down before you further embarass the Bar and the people of the 4th Circuit, and before you are removed from office.
Wes White
The gig is up – The scheme is exposed – Their entire false story is coming apart at the seams schemes. – But they continue to lie to the bitter end – That is the story of the Trayvon Martin Family and Family Attorneys (Crump, Jackson, Parks et al). All they know is lying – They have invested themselves so much in the false story they cannot even cognitively tell the difference between their lies and the Truth. Unfortunately, the same holds true for their simple-minded, sheeple supporters.
Consider – Their Latest Claim: “they did not align with the Black Panthers”.

Whoopsie – Um, well lets take a look at this, shall we: The capacity of the Trayvon Martin supporters and Scheme Team to boldly lie is quite staggering. The latest *cough* claim from the schemers is their protestations that the Martin Family and family Attorneys did not support the New Black Panther Party.

This claim of “non-support” or “non-alliance” with the Black Panthers is actually quite representative of how far they will go to sell a story of fabrications, falsehoods and lies. It does not take our site to diminish their credibility, and expose their LIES – it just takes their own lying words and your eyes to bear witness. (more…)
We’re working on figuring out why Judge Nelson wants Richard Conner kicked out ASAP. Using the “francining names” placed into trial records by Don West late last night we begin to find the unknown backstory.
From them we make a remarkable discovery. Unbelievably, it appears Trayvon’s Dad, Tracy, was actually one of the people talking to Trayvon about buying and selling a handgun. Considering the “conversation was mysteriously deleted” this appears to be a big effen’ deal. WOW. [ *Sidenote* We could also use help with crowdsourcing on these]:

WOW – as in Tracy Martin’s nickname is “Fruit“. Yes, you are reading that correctly – Trayvon Martin’s Dad’s nickname is “fruit“.

East St. Louis Il. The hometown of Travon Martin's father(Tracy "Fruit" Martin),Send out much love, support, praying that justice is served.
— Christie Dale Smith (@BBALLR2) March 26, 2012
Why does that matter? Because during testimony about the exchange over gun purchases Trayvon was exchanging text’s with a person who’s nickname was “fruit”.
Yes, that means that Tracy Martin was texting his son, Trayvon, about buying and selling handguns. Large jpeg image HERE. (more…)
The argument, not by the State, but by Judge Nelson herself, regarding authentication, is so weak and insufferably devoid of legal analysis it is absurd on its face. Then again this is the same judge who said a few days ago, flippantly in open court, that evidence should be “shredded” (Dr. Bao notes).
Essentially she’s arguing that the phone records (texts and pics) cannot be authenticated to have originated by Trayvon Martin (despite two security codes) because anyone could have sent them. Whiskey*Tango*Foxtrot !! How can an email be used in a sex offender case? How can phone records be used in RICO cases? How can GPS evidence be used in Insurance Cases? Think about it.
You can’t argue that evidence cannot be admitted because someone else might have made the phone call; Someone else might have sent the email; Someone else accessed the website; Someone else might have driven the car etc.
Not to exclude evidence.
Sure it can be argued by the other side, as a counter point to the jury, but it can’t be a reasonable consideration for exclusion.
I’m evaluating how much we can reasonably share and cite without compromising people and structures which could be placed at risk.
These guys are NOTHING if not predictable. The countdown clock has officially started for Mark O’Mara and Don West to be publically called racist. They have around 18 hours (+/- a few), that’s one media cycle, until the entire construct of the Black Grievance Industry has received the notification to engage:
We know with specific certainty that Tracy Martin lied on the stand today when falsely claimed not to have denied the voice of Trayvon Martin to SPD Detective Chris Serino. Tracy also denies ever telling Sybrina that he heard the 911 calls on 2/28/12. Previously, during her testimony, Sybrina Fulton denied ever knowing about the 911 call audio until 3/16/12. However, we know according to court documents, a complaint (suit) was filed against Bill Lee and the Sanford Police Dept demanding release of the call audio 3/09/12.