CTH has long documented the history of FBI as a political weapon for the interests of Washington DC. From a research perspective there is no longer any question about the intents and motives of the FBI as a fully weaponized agency, working against the interests of the American people.
That said, Senators Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson have recently released stunning information highlighting how the FBI conducted an operation in 2022 entirely to ensnare President Donald Trump within their corrupt and political investigative clutches. [Press Announcement Here]
Grassley and Johnson have sent the documentary evidence to current Attorney General Pam Bondi along with a letter that outlines a political targeting operation against Donald Trump known as “Arctic Frost.” [Letter pdf Here]
WASHINGTON – In a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Kash Patel, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations Chairman Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) made public legally protected whistleblower disclosures showing the FBI, as part of its Arctic Frost investigation, acquired the government cell phones of President Donald Trump and former Vice President Mike Pence, among other government officials. FBI agents used taxpayer dollars to crisscross the country and conduct dozens of interviews in support of the political probe.
The unclassified FBI records convey the alarming scope and speed of the FBI’s 2022 investigation of President Trump, which they dubbed “Operation Arctic Frost.” The investigation – launched by anti-Trump FBI agent Timothy Thibault in a breach of FBI protocol – formed the basis of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s elector case against Trump. Upon opening the investigation, Thibault vowed it would be “prioritized over all others in the Branch” and commented that “it frankly took too long for us to open this [investigation].”
“Sunshine is the best disinfectant,” the chairmen wrote to Bondi and Patel. “The American people deserve to know the complete extent of the corruption within the DOJ and FBI that led to the investigation into President Trump. We are making this information public for purposes of public accountability and to provide specific examples of past behavior at your institutions that must not be repeated. Quite simply, the public has a right to know what happened in Arctic Frost and, based on what we’ve exposed to date, the American public deserves better from its law enforcement agencies. It is important that every individual at your agencies maintains the highest level of professionalism, and does not allow political bias to motivate or guide their investigative work.”
Within weeks of opening Arctic Frost on April 13, 2022, FBI agents began taking aggressive action to build out their case. The following is a summary of some Arctic Frost investigatory updates, based on unclassified internal FBI records: (more)
Let’s if Bondi does anything to prosecute this or just sits on it.
Blonde Kamala isnt gonna do shit.
[Thibault ]
[Elias ]
[Pomerantz]
https://rumble.com/v6qpfbw-fleetwood-mac-the-chain.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
Tick tock M’fers
** Was the head of ISIS whose miserable life was terminated actually 5Eyes? Just like that Columbia grad student cause celebre is actually MI6?
47 knows exactly who, when, and where to strike.
Precision targeting.
Boom.
See ya, Paul Weiss.
Here we have a clear litmus test of PB’s and KP’s commitments both to justice and to the purge of the controlling DS influence within the FBI.
Props to the senators for going public with the damning evidence.
We’ll see what happens.
Maybe PB & KP will act when President Trump decides it’s time for them to act … my limited legal knowledge wonders if ALL the really damning evidence (still to come) must be included in the initial charge/filing – or that really damning evidence is then excluded, ignored or weakened ??
AG Bondi is looking less competent every day.
Blah blah blah blah …
Need to see some
FROG MARCHING TO
GITMO !!!
How about some legitimate legal action against EVERY ONE of these communists?
Life in (a regular) prison would be a good start, after a legal trial of course!
Interesting takes on the Exhibit 1:
(1). The only States’ Trump Elector Nominees and Replacements who were investigated were from the five states that did not include in their Certificates of Votes (hereinafter referred to as their “papers,” were the five that did not include in their papers a contingent event that would have to take place for their votes to be considered–Trump had to win a “Non-Appealable” court case giving him the victory in each of those states. Those two states were PENNSYLVANIA and NEW MEXICO.
(2). Among the statutes referenced in Exhibit 1 under which the Trump Elector Nominees and their Replacements (for those original Elector Nominees who refused to cast votes, or could not cast a vote) were Mail Fraud and Wire Fraud. Apparently, after this exhaustive investigation of the Trump Alternate Elector Slates, there were NO INDICTMENTS OF ANY OF THEM for either Wire Fraud or Mail Fraud for the transmission of those documents to the proper federal and state officials required to receive Electors’ papers, such as the governor of the state, the National Archives, and the President of the Senate, among others. The only assumption that can be made from this is, the Elector Nominees and Replacements COMMITTED NO CRIME IN FILING THEIR PAPERS AS ARCTIC FROST INVESTIGATIONS COULD NOT ACHIEVE PROBABLE CAUSE.
(3). It should be noted that there is no federal criminal statute against filing such papers. If there was, the Elector Nominees and Replacements could have been charged with violating that statute. Therefore, there is nothing in Title 18 that designates “Alternate Elector Slates” to be anything like Fraudulent documents or Forged Documents. Until such a statute is passed, the mere filing of such papers is not a federal crime, and in the history of the filings of such papers, such as the 1876 election and the 1960 election, no one was so much as been INVESTIGATED for any possible crime unitl the 2020 election.
(4). During the J6 Committee hearings, some of these five states’ Elector Nominees and Replacements were questioned by the committee. All testified that the purpose of the filing was to provide Electoral Votes for Trump that could be counted in the event a state court decision gave Trump an election victory in their state. In short, they given the same reason for filing their papers as Pennsylvania and New Mexico. That this was result the FBI interviews of those Elector Nominees and Replacements, there was no probable cause to indict them just because they did not include that contingency in their papers. The Elector Nominees and Replacements filed those papers with only the motive of those papers being placeholder votes in the event of Trump winning those states through legal action. No evidence was found that they had any motive, such as Pence using the papers to declare Trump the winner of those Electoral Votes.
When are people going to JAIL
Bondi??
I don’t get it
So was this “Arctic Frost” an attempt to get PresTrump indicted on some particular premise?
Or was it a comprehensive search across the entire US to look for various indictable premises based on his dealings with numerous people across the US?
Anyone?
Arctic Frost was the genesis of Jack Smith’s indictment in the formal DOJ J6 case against Trump. In essence, Trump was accused of hatching a conspiracy to hijack the Electoral Vote Count by Congress by using VP Pence to throw out the 5-7 states’ Certificate of Ascertainment, filed by the governors of those states that declared Joe Biden the winner, and replace them with the papers sent by the Trump Elector Nominees and Replacements from those states. It was Smith’s conclusion, reflected in the main body of his indictment of Trump that:
(1). The Elector Nominees and Replacements did not know that their papers would be used in any other way than as placeholder votes in case Trump won court decisions that made him the winner in those states.
(2). The Elector Nominees and Replacements did not KNOWINGLY violate any federal statute since there is no federal statute against filing any such paper in the course of an Electoral Vote Count. The Congress, when confronted with “more than one paper purporting to be the electoral votes of a state,” the Congress decides which paper is to be accepted and which paper is to be rejected. Basically, any paper submitted is only given relevance if the Congress so decides it has, so fraud is using such papers to steal the Electoral Vote Count is virtually impossible.
(3). All such proceedings are subject to judicial review. If any party with standing disputes Congress’ decision can sue to test the constitutionality of their decision.
Exhibit 5 is more detailed in including the Trump Elector Nominees and Replacements as subjects of the investigation along with Trump, Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, and Boris Epshetyn. It’s interesting that no federal indictments were handed down of Elector Nominees and Replacements from any of those 5 states. The legal reason could be NO PROBABLE CAUSE. A political reason could be that Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro got himself too involved and gave a seemingly clean bill of health to the Pennsylvania Trump Elector Nominees’ Certificate of Votes. It might be why they were not investigated as Shapiro made himself a potential DEFENSE WITNESS, and the resulting concern in Democrat circles might have led to only probing the five that didn’t mention the condition of Trump winning a court decision for the votes to be considered.
Democrats insist that the Trump Elector Nominees and Replacements committed a crime, yet no federal indictment. If the papers submitted had to be approved by state authority, or sent by a state authority, all should have been charged with a crime. Nowhere in any statute is that explicitly stated. The CERTIFICATE OF ASCERTAINMENT has to be constructed a certain way, be signed by the governor, or Secretary of State, or other relevant state official (almost always the governor) and affected by the official seal of the state. The Certificates sent by the Trump Elector Nominees and Replacements were NOT Certificates of Ascertainment and therefore do not have to be constructed in the same precise manner.
I had to post this as a reply because of severe storms in my area forced me to disconnect both router and computer.
Ya know… we knew they were up to no good and engaging in illegal activities.. what we need to know at this point is.. what are the charges, who authorized the enterprise and when will they be arrested.. Don’t dump this in the Joebama closet, that man could find his way to the bathroom, he had no clue what y’all were doing..