Following a widely watched assembly of EU leaders, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announces that Britain will lead a “coalition of the willing” and the U.K. will put boots on the ground and planes in the air to create the “security guarantee” for a potential Russia-Ukraine ceasefire.
The Prime Minister did not specify any other European country who will align and join their military forces on the ground in Ukraine; instead outlining that additional military elements will be rapidly organized. PM Starmer stressed that U.S. military forces “must” backstop the EU military members and implied that Italian PM Meloni will only align with the principal of Italian military use if the USA is involved.
As secretary Rubio mentioned earlier in the day, the Ukraine/EU phrase “security guarantee” is more honestly described as “deterrence” or an insurance policy. Prime Minister Starmer and this EU ‘coalition of the willing’ are only willing to put their military into Ukraine if the USA will be guaranteed to come into the conflict if the ceasefire falls apart. This should not be a part of any reasonable consideration, given the 3rd parties (not Russia) that would intentionally seek to disrupt a ceasefire to suck the USA into battle. WATCH:
.
None of the other EU nations are willing to publicly say they will put their military into Ukraine, because the EU just doesn’t have a military force capable to deal with the conflict.
Why do I get the feeling that the EU is going to poke the bear and in doing so try to draw us into the conflict?
That seems to be the goal. Refuse their premise and make it clear we do not support their effort at escalation, nor will we mail them out of the consequences if they choose that path.
Nearly a million young Ukrainian men dead described as only a “dent” plus 100,000 Russian men dead and/or wounded is more than a “dent”. Russians think of the Ukrainians as their brothers and Putin has spoken of the tragedy of this and so has Trump. Thank goodness Trump has a heart. Stop believing the propaganda. The Ukrainians on the other hand, have been brainwashed since birth on Banderism, which is a Nazi supremist ideology, and refer to Russians as Orcs (pigs) and do not see them as brothers although they are all descended from the same history and lineage.
Nearly a million young Ukrainian men dead. Have to stop the pretending right there.
The go-to narrative whenever the mob starts to think for themselves is to make claims of the dead and dying because the media, with no proof whatsoever, said so. Exactly how the psyop played out during the fake pandemic, Never Fails…
If you really pay attention to Trump, he uses the dead and dying talk excessively. The dead and dying narrative was originally manufactured to establish legitimacy to a fake war. Trump is now using their own narrative against them to end the nonsense but as you can see, none of the frauds want to talk about that anymore.
Why is this proof of anything?
Brainwashed thanks to the Soros Open Society foundation which printed new textbooks for Ukraine to glorify Bandera and Ukrainian nationalism while the west was looting Ukraine as quickly as possible during the 1990’s.
I thought one Dunkirk in 1940 was enough for the British.
“Coalition of the willing” as opposed to the unwilling Ukrainians press-ganged into becoming cannon fodder.
Where is Clarion? Has that poster already enlisted? 😉
Where is Clarion? Has that poster already enlisted?
Surely you jest!
o.0
When I saw Italian PM Meloni in the picture earlier today with those other leaders, I was disappointed, to say the least, because Trump had praised her earlier and she seemed like an ally for him. I don’t know if I should be relieved that she will only align with military support if the US is involved also. I agree this whole gathering together of these leaders is FOLLY.
i saw an article that the brits had made a minerals deal ALREADY ??? a week or so before this OVal Office “who’s your Daddy moment “??
Jan 17 bf Trump inauguration
The UK has a subsoil deal with Ukraine as of 2021.
The 100 year ‘Ukraine Is Now A Colony Of England’ deal was signed on January 17th this year.
(The same day Russia signed with Iran.)
It’s a fascinating read!
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-ukraine-100-year-partnership-declaration/uk-ukraine-100-year-partnership-declaration
o.0
In an appendix, Starmer states that he will put boots on the ground!planes in the sky but only as long as the US is Johnny on the spot to come over and fight those big, bad Russians, if they want to horn in on your mineral deal. And of course, trustworthy Starmer, the one who worked the deal behind Trump’s back and didn’t even have the decency to tell Trump Sorry! We beat you to it.. we are OUT. Stand on your own 2 feet. No more money, no more support. You are toast.
She’s saying she trusts Trump’s judgement on this one.
That’s fine…… as long as his judgement is>>>>> H*ll No We Won’t Go!
I too was disappointed to see her in the picture, but I’ve got a feeling she’s more aligned with Fico and Orban that with the other num-nuts.
And let’s hope Georgescu in Romania can escape from the CIA’s and USAID’s election interference to finally get into office. Together, they may be able to help encourage the populist revolt that’s coming to Europe.
She turned out to be just as globalist as the left wing. She has supported Ukraine with millions in money and equipment.
She said she won’t join unless we are in.
I’ve done a fair share of business deals over the years. Certainly nothing compares to our President Trump. That said, there’s an old saw/proverb around deals: “the best deals one ever does are the deals never done.”
There is no reason we HAVE to be involved. I get the US IC started this mess. So sorry.
Just…Walk…Away
I agree.
I’m so done with all this..
And, jail those IC members!
The IC is definitely involved, been noticing the little Easter eggs they are sloppily dropping all over the terrain. Must be DEI hires.
Have noticed some D list podcasters I’ll never listen to again dropping subtle anti Trump rhetoric.
Agree. It’s going to be a loser Z-EU deal. A False-Flag-Fake deal. Without PT Putin won’t come to the table.
Isn’t there a British election in May? Are the Brit’s going to vote to send troops to Ukraine?
Local elections only.
But they might be a bellweather for the Labour Party.
I certainly hope so.
Someone posted on one site that I read, “Starmer is making Rishi Sunak look good.”
As I said on the other thread….Starmer has completely ignored the fact that Russia is the power to satisfy. Since Russia is winning and can continue the conflict. Russia has strongly rejected any placement of “peace-keepers”….which would be exactly like putting NATO back on the borders of Russia. It is very premature to plan for UK “boots” on the ground or any “coalition of the willing”.
I hope the Brits fully understand that they are fighting for the inner working of cellphones, laptops, and computers, and that they will never EVER see the profits of their disabilities, PTSD, or even deaths.
Starmer needs to resign, and the Brits should be marching and demanding it!
… ‘placement of “peace-keepers”….which would be exactly like putting NATO back on the borders of Russia.’
NATO – [N]ations [A]uthorized to [T]repass [O]thers
IF Trunmp says no will Starmer still send troops after all his
talk of standing with Ukraine and peace and such?
Probably not. This is a European “you first” moment. 😂
Europe can’t wipe their own ass. No, they won’t do anything without the US. But this is a pincer move by the Europeans: with Pres Trump saying he wants peace, Europe is willing to entertain a cease-fire IF the US “backstops” it. So their narrative will be that “Trump wants peace, but he won’t provide the backstop for a cease-fire.
You can see their play a mile away – PDT needs to not get stuck between Scylla and Charybdis – he needs to stick to his principles and not get us involved at all. If they holler, “but – but- NATO!” he needs to remind them that NATO only lasted this long because the USA covered all of the bets – so “We’re out! – Europe, fight your own economic wars!”
But I guarantee you that Congress will try and force PDT’s hand since so many of them are all in for Ukraine.
Today’s posturing is designed to box President Trump in I believe, gueppebarre.
There are snares all through it.
God please grant President Trump the perspicacity to see every one.
LOL, so they think.
Maybe there’s a benefit in the language used, which does not describe the US.
“Coalition of the willing….”
We’re not.
Let’s see if CONgress has the balls to declare war.
I think not.
How much peace can we afford? How much operational capital does lil’ Z actually have if we cut his ass off?
When do we claw back the Taxpayer funded mega mansion in South Beach?
I already have to share Florida air with Hannity and a bunch of squishy Californians. Banderite Nazis are a bridge too far.
You are right – that is expecting way too much of you – nobody should have to put up with that.
The mineral deal that Putin is offering the US is a far better deal. Much upside, little downside, don’t have to be worried about doing something that will trigger WWIll. Much larger area of minerals, no troops needed. Since the Brit’s want to play dirty and have betrayed a NATO member, maybe we will just go over to the other side. A New World .
.
They cant afford it nor do they have numbers and equipment. This is a flaccid performance to make the US place troops in the Ukraine. Trump knows all this.
Well to h*ll with that.
If UK wants to send troops to Ukraine to fight, let ’em.
But in No. Way. should the US be involved in this NATO mess.
In fact, how about we just GTFO of NATO????
they don’t have brit troops to send, so perhaps like Z, they can force conscription on all of the knife- wielding muslim refugees… put them to work
Why would we want to get involved in any of this? For that matter, why are we even discussing a treaty to access strategically critical raw materials in Ukraine when Morgan Stanley is only the latest to conclude that there is nothing economically viable there to extract. And from what I’ve been able to gather, everything worth mining is situated in Russian controlled territory. What are the odds that Putin will surrender lands that he has already taken. Close to zero, I’d say.
Please post the evidence – report, study, announcement or whatever. I have seen you make this post a number of times but there is never a link to the source(s) of your information.
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-and-ukraine-sign-landmark-100-year-partnership-to-deepen-security-ties-and-strengthen-partnership-for-future-generations
“It also cements the UK as a preferred partner for Ukraine’s energy sector, critical minerals strategy and green steel production.”
https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/precious-metals-rare-earth-minerals-morgan-stanley-breaks-down-ukraine-peace-deal
Under what flag will these troops serve?
British? EU? NATO?
If NATO and they are attacked, would Article V kick in?
In other words, would the US be obliged to come to their aid?
Details, details…
Something very wicked is being planned.
It’s finally came to pass! PM Thatcher called it that socialism is all fine and good until you run out of other peoples money and the EU just ran out of US funds.
Heck, Monti….even we’ve run out of funds. Thanks to spendaholics both sides throughout Congress.
Then there’s the grift, graft, and money laundering…
NATO is a defense treaty. Europe deploying troops to a war zone is purely an offensive act.
If they’re fired upon, tough luck. A5 doesn’t apply.
In theory, sis. They’ve turned it into something else, and not a soul has objected.
What was seems to have stealthily morphed into the something else.
My gut-mind axis doesn’t like this at all. The Death Cult is here to stay until we destroy them, sis.
Nor mine.
World altering change is happening, and it has brought chaos with it.
To be expected….
Still…
Lots of videos today showing men in Ukraine being dragged off the streets, some brutally, to send to the meat grinder. So far I haven’t seen any reaction from the British people about this announcement.
We will see in the days ahead if there is comment. I’m sure there is plenty of prison space available for these who do.
UK won’t be attacked in UK by Russia so why would NATO ART 5 kick in?
FUKraine not NATO AND UK going in voluntarily..idk
I’d say all bets are off at this point. Events have spiralled out of the control of those who have already broken their word to Russia and pushed NATO eastward right up to her border.
All it will take is one event to find out.
We’re dealing with people here with their own agendas, and not a scintilla of honour can be claimed by a single one. I for one wouldn’t put anything past any of them.
I strongly believe that President Trump understands completely that if he partners with these globalist pigs and allows US boots on the ground in Ukraine he would lose all credibility…ALL of it..
WW 3
Can Europe Ever Catch Up On Defense Spending: US Spent $8.4 Trillion In Past Decade… Rest Of NATO Just $3.8 Trillion
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/can-europe-ever-catch-defense-spending-us-spent-84-trillion-past-decade-rest-nato-just
He already warned them, “Who knows, Ukraine may be Russian again.”
The Ukraine was never the Ukraine. They failed to file their boundaries.
The Ukraine is “The Territory Formerly Known As The Soviet Socialist Republic Of The Ukraine“.
Seriously.
Look it up.
o.0
I typed, and then deleted my response to the statements of this intergalactic twit five times.
All too expletive laden to post…
Finally opted for pointing and laughing instead.
Thanks for posting that. Haven’t seen that in years
UK puts boots on the ground. Russia stops oil sales to Europe. Your mover Starmer
Want to really put the squeeze on? 50% tariffs on all European imports into the United States concurrent with Russia ceasing oil and gas sales to Europe.
The ceasefire is likely imminent. The real n*t-cutting will be over the status of captured territory.
“Security” is actually Zelensky’s attempt to set up the conditions for Russian expulsion.
I doubt there will be a ceasefire any time soon. Russia says, peace agreement first, then ceasefire. US is saying ceasefire and then peace negotiations. LOL! Russia would be idiotic to lay down arms with Zelensky ready and willing to do anything to stop peace, when all the western “allies” are ready to send everything to Ukraine to build it up to continue the war.
Plausible.
Retired Magistrate here: The United States has been paying premiums on Europe’s “insurance plan” since World War I and what has it gotten us? Thousands of our best and brightest killed on foreign shores, billions of dollars spent cleaning up Europe’s messes and the promise of more killing and dollars to further their vision of what the world should be: green new deal, loss of freedom and unlimited immigration so that their countries are no longer recognizable as the way they were originally founded.
President Trump has promised a “New Golden Age” for the United States while Europe seems hell bent on going back to the Dark Ages. Fine with me: let Europe have their Dark Ages I will go for the “New Golden Age.” It’s time we let Europe fend for itself. The allies of old are no more.
Uncle Sucker’s piggy bank is closed.
The UK is working its way toward civil war.
Does Keir Starmer intend to send the young men to fight in Ukraine so that they don’t fight at home?
I doubt if any of his “illegals” population are willing to fight and die for Britain….just saying.
The illegals won’t be on the records to force into military service. The native Brits will go and be replaced by the riff raff and criminals brought into the country.
Ethnic cleansing of both Ukraine and the UK.
The illegals will remain behind while the natives will be shipped out leaving the female and elderly populations at the mercy of ever expanding tolerance for sharia justice.
ROFLO Tell me another one!
The utter absurdity of the need for any foreign troops in Ukraine reveals the NATO goal of World War with Russia.
I have no doubt President Putin will abide by what he agrees to.
The only parties with motivation to violate their end of an agreement are those clamoring for war with Russia involving the United States.
If President Trump makes the mistake of sending ANY U.S. troops to Ukraine, no matter what the reason, it will destroy his Presidency.
All of these leaders clamoring to send troops to Ukraine are leading against the will of the people they claim to represent.
PM Starmer opened his mouth and all you could hear was, ‘Liar, Liar, pants on fire!’
Sure. We must protect Europe while they replace their populations with Muslims, aid and abet the grooming of their children, and imprison Christians for praying .
NO, NO, NO! Bring ALL of our troops home from every one of these weasel’s countries! No more of OUR money to any of these clown world lackeys! Enough!
This is how close to the brink we were with Obama’s 4th term (aka Kamala)
.
Unless Ukraine has something substantial to offer that would benefit the U.S., we should have no interest in expending blood or treasure on its behalf.
Period.
.
We aren’t mercenaries. Our sons & daughters are not for sale.
.
I think you took my comment in a way I didn’t mean.
.
Forget “subtance to offer.” Unless it’s in our vital national interests we should have nothing to do with it.
There’s a better case for aiding Taiwan (at least until we can bring back our own electronics industry in enough strength to supply our military) than being involved in Ukraine or Israel (unless we can get that Gaza deal in association with the proposed canal… not being beholden to the Suez canal and it’s limitations would be in our economic interests).
I’d very much like to keep President Trump’s record on starting no new wars during his terms intact.
.
In our “national interests” is what I meant by “substantial”.
.
The most intriguing thing to me is that there have been many “substantial offers” made and put on the table for decades including ending the fighting and saving lives, minerals, energy, science, and vast natural and manufactured resources, open reciprocal trade, working together, peace accords, etc, etc.
The problem is, they’ve all come from Russia, not Ukraine or from the EU, UK.
All this talk from the Europeans is nothing more than a sleight-of-hand, faux, pretend NATO membership for Ukraine.
They’re dreaming.
Vermonters were so outraged at JD’s offending Zelensky they spontaneously gathered to protest in below zero weather near his ski rental. They also threw in a few LBGTQAI signs.
If Trump was supportive of the war the same people would be protesting that too.
The gas lighting continues.
Interesting X thread https://x.com/NationFirstAust/status/1895791087144595837?t=7Qo86jWBAi8Y9poa15pE4A&s=19
See it all right here, the entire 22 Twit thread, no account required:
https://xcancel.com/NationFirstAust/status/1895791087144595837
Thanks, a great, brief and easy-to-read explanation of how we got here! Insanity all the way down!
If starmer had any integrity, he would be honest and acknowledge that what he is saying is pure BS. Because the only military that matters is the US Military and getting it involved is his objective.
Of Course he did, Rubio just gave 4 Billion to Israel for a faux “emergency” just like Oct 7, when we refused to fund the Ukraine grift. So far thats 12 Billion in military aid alone for free, this year alone. Not including their subsidized housing and free college paid by the US taxpayer We need to audit every penny given to Israel who haven’t stood by the US ever to my knowlege. “The Great Game” should be paid for by the UK, not the US.
If anyone deserves an ice pick, its Starmer!
The little green 🧌 already tried telling PDJT what the US has to do. It got him thrown out of the WH. Does Starmer think he has bigger balls than PDJT?
Laugh in their faces & flip them the Mickey middle fingers & wish them all good luck.
Don’t bother to call. Buh-bye AssClowns.
Isn’t it time for President Trump, Mike Waltz, Marco Rubio and Tulsi to tell Americans the truth about Ukraine…
A: The three Eastern Provinces of Donetsk, Kerson and Lugansk are Russian speaking and broke away from Ukraine in 2014 and formed their own government.
B: The CIA and Victoria Nuland funded the violent overthrow of the President of Ukraine in 2014 because he allowed Ukraine to be neutral.
C: The UN monitored elections in the Eastern Provinces who voted to break away from Ukraine.
D: The region that the Russian Army entered haven’t been part of Ukraine since 2014.
E: The CIA and DIA top secret documents leaked by Massachusetts Air National Guardsmen Tiexiera revealed that Ukraine was losing troops at an 8-1 ratio versus Russia!
Why are they dancing on the head of a pin???
F. Ukraine has been bombing and killing the Russian speaking peoples in the three eastern provinces since 2014.
How about trading us Canada as #51 for USA being security backstop?
Exactly!
they are sooo sick……VVP will Stalingradized them….
No way that globalist egg head new British Prime Minister will send some of his troops over there to be slaughtered alongside Ukraine troops.
How about a boot up his ass instead?
Small men can talk big when they send other people to fight their battles. America needs to disengage from this lunacy, no talks, and certainly not our hard earned money.
Let the actor who played a President now take on the role of a soldier.
Who are they trying to get rid of- their own people or the new arrivals?
In Europe last week…between Sky News, BBC and CNN Int’l…they lead with all Ukraine all the time…and are all in with the poor Ukraine label, how the US needs to “more involved” and how great Starmer is…they can’t stand our Lion…
F’em…have at it and good luck you Euro losers…
10 pound ego in a 5 pound bag leads the final dissolution of England.
By the way, did you know that calling Starmer “Eurotrash” will get your post deleted on TGP?
Euro Poor’s got deleted too
Please, dear Euro friends, take seriously what the Russians say when they say no NATO troops in Ukraine under any circumstances. They mean it. They really do.
Uk/FUKraine signed minerals deal on Jan 17 and Trump found out.
Zel was trying to get us fighting his war w/Putin.
Not habbening….he tried to demand $300 billion up front from Trump and other demands bf cameras were allowed in according to CommerseSec Ludnick.
Trump won’t be lied to or mocked
Boots on the ground, but the British Navy is already running into trouble:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14452455/Putin-missile-attack-sink-container-ship-British-weapons-Ukraine.html
Time to conscript all these Z lovers. Especially those calling for intervention across this nation. Once the summer of love comes grabbed and shipped them out.
Starmer is trying to make himself relevant after the Zelenskyy crash and burn in the oval office. All the little twits gathered together to come up with the stupidest plan – all together now let’s fight Russia as a quasi NATO group to guarantee peace but, but only if the US is Required to back us up with not only money but have soldiers die to protect the plan. See, I can’t even write this nonsense seriously.
After Zelenskyy embrassed himself and the EU/WEF who apparently coached him and violated the sanctity of our Oval office through his disrespect and contempt for America, this is what they come up with?
They expect President Trump to agree to this when he has said he only wants peace, he doesn’t want a negotiating advantage. No way will the President agree to any of this insanity ever.
Herr Starmer cannot be serious, standing at a podium named “Securing Our Future”. He has every intention of baiting us into a huge loss-of-life battle. He & the EU will pull their troops the minute US feet touch inside the Ukranian border. The Brits can pound sand—no, no, no!! We have to say no! We have to say we won’t go!!
Steve Bannon: The people who hate Russia the most are the very same people who loved the Communist Soviet Union…
https://rumble.com/v5z24gn-bannon-the-people-who-supported-stalin-are-the-same-ones-who-hate-russia-to.html