Sometimes DC is a fishbowl, and they don’t realize the background of what we know, when they are speaking. Testimony today is a case study of one bubble within that fishbowl.
Former House Impeachment Manager Adam Schiff organized the first impeachment effort against President Donald Trump. Schiff is now a Senator. Schiff’s former lead staff in the impeachment investigation was Mary McCord.
Today, during the question session for AG Pam Bondi’s nomination, Adam Schiff asked Mary McCord about whether AG Bondi should recuse herself from investigating Adam Schiff and Mary McCord. It’s a little funny if you understand the background.
I prompted the video to the part at 01:36:14 when Schiff asks McCord, and Mrs. McCord responds with “yes, Pam Bondi should recuse.” WATCH:
Mary McCord says Pam Bondi must recuse herself from any investigative outcome related to the first impeachment effort. Who was the lead staff working for Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler on the first impeachment effort? Mary McCord.
Now, triggering that first impeachment effort… Who worked with ICIG Michael Atkinson to change the CIA whistleblower regulations permitting an anonymous complaint? Yep, that would be the same Mary McCord.
In essence, the woman who organized, structured, led and coordinated the first impeachment effort, says Pam Bondi must recuse herself from investigating the organization, structure, leadership and coordination of the first impeachment effort.
You just cannot make this stuff up.
Obviously, doing their ‘pretending not to know routine,” every republican sat on their hands when Mary McCord was testifying about all the terrible attributes and conflicts that surround Pam Bondi. Do not fool yourself, every republican on the judiciary committee knows exactly who Mary McCord is, and her deeply rooted Intelligence Community connections to the Deep State.
It’s a fun intellectual exercise to remind yourself just who Mary McCord is, and how deeply enmeshed in the stop Trump operation she is. Remember, Mary McCord openly said she is currently working with a group to “bring lawsuits” against President Trump in his second term as soon as he takes office:
[…] “We’re already starting to put together a team to think through the most damaging types of things that he [Trump] might do so that we’re ready to bring lawsuits if we have to,” said Mary McCord, executive director of the Institution for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection at Georgetown Law.
Part of the aim is to identify like-minded organizations and create a coalition to challenge Trump from day one, those taking part in the discussions said. Some participants are combing through policy papers being crafted for a future conservative administration. They’re also watching the interviews that Trump allies are giving to the press for clues to how a Trump sequel would look. (more)
So, even if the Trump administration officials do not confront Mary McCord, which they likely will not do – because they genuinely appear to be afraid of her, Mary McCord is going to target them.
The Lawfare operation that Mary McCord represents is going to try and block President Trump, and the Senate is just sitting there listening to Mary McCord speak today, while pretending they don’t know this. Good grief, it’s frustrating to watch.
Just to put some emphasis on this mess, here’s a reminder of who Mary McCord is…
A recent soundbite shared on the Twitter platform aligns with so many aspects about how the IC targets their enemies, and how the DOJ National Security Division (DOJ-NSD) then weaponizes the opportunities provided by the U.S intelligence apparatus.
Notice in this short video how Mary McCord positions the power structure of the DOJ-NSD silo in deference to the Intelligence Community (IC). This is a critical path within the next step to American’s “great awakening.” In the past we have outlined how the DOJ-NSD weaponizes their Lawfare by using “National Security Information,” or what the insiders call “NSI.”
As an outcome of the way our checks and balances have been modified against our interests, the judicial branch has repeatedly deferred to the DOJ around the issue of “national security.” In fact, if the DOJ labels any Lawfare approach as a national security matter the subsequent evidence therein, the NSI (even when not seen) is accepted by the judicial branch without question. The judicial branch defers to the executive on all matters defined by the executive as “national security.”
This is the area of exploit being discussed by Mary McCord in this segment. However, notice there is one apparatus that can supercede the DOJ-NSD’s ability to weaponize Nat Sec Information, that’s the power of the intelligence apparatus. WATCH:
Lawfare coordinator Mary McCord admits that she and another lawfare coordinator, Andrew Weissmann, worked with the DOJ and intelligence losers on what bogus charges to bring against Trump. pic.twitter.com/4jqgetvURZ
— The Researcher (@listen_2learn) October 4, 2024
McCord notes how she and Andrew Weissmann navigate through the process of using NSI as they move toward their target; the most common reference is their political opposition, Donald J Trump.
If there is one Lawfare operative who has escaped scrutiny for her corrupt endeavors, it would be Mary McCord. More than any other Lawfare operative within Main Justice, Mary McCord sits at the center of every table in the manufacturing of cases against Donald Trump. {GO DEEP} Mary McCord’s husband is Sheldon Snook; he was the right hand to the legal counsel of Chief Justice John Roberts when the Dobbs decision was leaked.
When the Carter Page FISA application was originally assembled by the FBI and DOJ, there was initial hesitancy from within the DOJ National Security Division (DOJ-NSD) about submitting the application, because it did not have enough citations in evidence (the infamous ‘Woods File’). That’s why the Steele Dossier ultimately became important. It was the Steele Dossier that provided the push, the legal cover needed for the DOJ-NSD to submit the application for a Title-1 surveillance warrant against the campaign of Donald J. Trump.
When the application was finally assembled for submission to the FISA court, the head of the DOJ-NSD was John Carlin. Carlin quit working for the DOJ-NSD in late September 2016 just before the final application was submitted (October 21,2016). John Carlin was replaced by Deputy Asst. Attorney General, Mary McCord.
♦ When the FISA application was finally submitted (approved by Sally Yates and James Comey), it was Mary McCord who did the actual process of filing the application and gaining the Title-1 surveillance warrant.
A few months later, February 2017, with Donald Trump now in office as President, it was Mary McCord who went with Deputy AG Sally Yates to the White House to confront White House legal counsel Don McGahn over the Michael Flynn interview with FBI agents. The surveillance of Flynn’s calls was presumably done under the auspices and legal authority of the FISA application Mary McCord previously was in charge of submitting.
♦ At the time the Carter Page application was filed (October 21, 2016), Mary McCord’s chief legal counsel inside the office was a DOJ-NSD lawyer named Michael Atkinson. In his role as the legal counsel for the DOJ-NSD, it was Atkinson’s job to review and audit all FISA applications submitted from inside the DOJ. Essentially, Atkinson was the DOJ internal compliance officer in charge of making sure all FISA applications were correctly assembled and documented.
♦ When the anonymous CIA whistleblower complaint was filed against President Trump for the issues of the Ukraine call with President Zelensky, the Intelligence Community Inspector General had to change the rules for the complaint to allow an anonymous submission. Prior to this change, all intelligence whistleblowers had to put their name on the complaint. It was this 2019 IGIC who changed the rules. Who was the Intelligence Community Inspector General? Michael Atkinson.
When ICIG Michael Atkinson turned over the newly authorized anonymous whistleblower complaint to the joint House Intelligence and Judiciary Committee (Schiff and Nadler chairs), who did Michael Atkinson give the complaint to? Mary McCord.
Yes, after she left main justice, Mary McCord took the job of working for Chairman Jerry Nadler and Chairman Adam Schiff as the chief legal advisor inside the investigation that led to the construction of articles of impeachment. As a consequence, Mary McCord received the newly permitted anonymous whistleblower complaint from her old office colleague Michael Atkinson.
♦ During his investigation of the Carter Page application, Inspector General Michael Horowitz discovered an intentional lie inside the Carter Page FISA application (directly related to the ‘Woods File’), which his team eventually tracked to FBI counterintelligence division lawyer, Kevin Clinesmith. Eventually Clinesmith was criminally charged with fabricating evidence (changed wording on an email) in order to intentionally falsify the underlying evidence in the FISA submission.
When John Durham took the Clinesmith indictment to court, the judge in the case was James Boasberg.
♦ In addition to being a DC criminal judge, James Boasberg is also a FISA court judge who signed-off on one of the renewals for the FISA application that was submitted using fraudulent evidence fabricated by Kevin Clinesmith. In essence, now the presiding judge over the FISA court, Boasberg was the FISC judge who was tricked by Clinesmith, and now the criminal court judge in charge of determining Clinesmith’s legal outcome. Judge Boasberg eventually sentenced Clinesmith to 6 months probation.
As an outcome of continued FISA application fraud and wrongdoing by the FBI, in their exploitation of searches of the NSA database, Presiding FISC Judge James Boasberg appointed an amici curiae advisor to the court who would monitor the DOJ-NSD submissions and ongoing FBI activities.
Who did James Boasberg select as a FISA court amicus? Mary McCord.
♦ SUMMARY: Mary McCord submitted the original false FISA application to the court using the demonstrably false Dossier. Mary McCord participated in the framing of Michael Flynn. Mary McCord worked with ICIG Michael Atkinson to create a fraudulent whistleblower complaint against President Trump; and Mary McCord used that manipulated complaint to assemble articles of impeachment on behalf of the joint House Intel and Judiciary Committee. Mary McCord then took up a defensive position inside the FISA court to protect the DOJ and FBI from sunlight upon all the aforementioned corrupt activity.
You can clearly see how Mary McCord would be a person of interest if anyone was going to start digging into corruption internally within the FBI, DOJ or DOJ-NSD.
What happened next….
November 3, 2021 – In Washington DC – “Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) and the House Jan. 6 Select Committee has tapped Mary McCord, who once ran the Justice Department’s National Security Division, for representation in its fight to obtain former President Donald Trump’s White House records. (read more)
That’s the context; now I want to go back a little.
First, when did Mary McCord become “amicus” to the FISA court? ANSWER: When the court (Boasberg) discovered IG Michael Horowitz was investigating the fraudulent FISA application. In essence, the FISA Court appointed the person who submitted the fraudulent filing, to advise on any ramifications from the fraudulent filing. See how that works?
Now, let’s go deeper….
When Mary McCord went to the White House with Sally Yates to talk to white house counsel Don McGhan about the Flynn call with Russian Ambassador Kislyak, and the subsequent CBS interview with VP Pence, where Pence’s denial of any wrongdoing took place, the background narrative in the attack against Flynn was the Logan Act.
The construct of the Logan Act narrative was pure Lawfare, and DAG Sally Yates with Acting NSD AAG Mary McCord were the architects.
Why was the DOJ National Security Division concerned with a conflict between what Pence said on CBS and what Flynn said about his conversations with Kislyak?
This is where a big mental reset is needed. Flynn did nothing wrong. The incoming National Security Advisor can say anything he wants with the Russian ambassador, short of giving away classified details of any national security issue. In December of 2016, if Michael Flynn wanted to say Obama was an a**hole, and the Trump administration disagreed with everything he ever did, the incoming NSA was free to do so. There was simply nothing wrong with that conversation – regardless of content.
So, why were McCord and Yates so determined to make an issue in media and in confrontation with the White House? Why did the DOJ-NSD even care? This is the part that people overlooked when the media narrative was driving the news cycle. People got too stuck in the weeds and didn’t ask the right questions.
Some entity, we discover later was the FBI counterintelligence division, was monitoring Flynn’s calls. They transcribed a copy of the call between Flynn and Kislyak, and that became known as the “Flynn Cuts” as described within internal documents, and later statements.
After the Flynn/Kislyak conversation was leaked to the media, Obama asked ODNI Clapper how that call got leaked. Clapper went to the FBI on 1/4/17 and asked FBI Director James Comey. Comey gave Clapper a copy of the Flynn Cuts which Clapper then took back to the White House to explain to Obama.
Obama’s White House counsel went bananas, because Clapper had just walked directly into the Oval Office with proof the Obama administration was monitoring the incoming National Security Advisor.
Obama’s plausible deniability of the Trump surveillance was lost as soon as Clapper walked in with the written transcript.
That was the motive for the 1/5/17 Susan Rice memo, and the reason for Obama to emphasize “buy the book” three times.
It wasn’t that Obama didn’t know already; the problem was that a document trail now existed (likely a CYA from Comey) that took away Obama’s plausible deniability of knowledge.
The January 5th meeting documented by Susan Rice was quickly organized to mitigate this issue.
Knowing the Flynn Cuts were created simultaneously with the phone call, and knowing how it was quickly decided to use the Logan Act as a narrative against Flynn and Trump, we can be very sure both McCord and Yates had read that transcript before they went to the White House. [Again, this is the entire purpose of them going to the White House to confront McGhan with their manufactured concerns.]
So, when it comes to ‘who leaked’ the reality of the Flynn/Kislyak call to the media, the entire predicate for the Logan Act violation – in hindsight – I would bet a donut it was Mary McCord.
But wait, there’s more….
Now we go back to McCord’s husband, Sheldon Snook.
Sheldon was working for the counsel to John Roberts. The counsel to the Chief Justice has one job, to review the legal implications of issues before the court and advise Justice John Roberts. The counsel to the Chief Justice knows everything happening in the court and is the sounding board for any legal issues impacting the Supreme Court.
In his position as the right hand of the counsel to the chief justice, Sheldon Snook would know everything happening inside the court.
At the time, there was nothing bigger inside the court than the Alito opinion known as the Dobb’s Decision – the returning of abortion law to the states. Without any doubt, the counsel to Chief Justice Roberts would have that decision at the forefront of his advice and counsel. By extension, this puts the actual written Alito opinion in the orbit of Sheldon Snook.
After the Supreme Court launched a heavily publicized internal investigation into the leaking of the Dobbs decision (Alito opinion), something interesting happened. Sheldon Snook left his position. If you look at the timing of the leak, the investigation and the Sheldon Snook exit, the circumstantial evidence looms large.
Of course, given the extremely high stakes, the institutional crisis with the public discovering the office of the legal counsel to the Chief Justice likely leaked the decision, such an outcome would be catastrophic for the institutional credibility. In essence, it would be Robert’s office who leaked the opinion to the media.
If you were Chief Justice John Roberts and desperately needed to protect the integrity of the court, making sure such a thermonuclear discovery was never identified would be paramount. Under the auspices of motive, Sheldon Snook would exit quietly. Which is exactly what happened.
The timeline holds the key.
Remember the stories of the J6 investigative staff all going to work for Jack Smith on the investigation of Donald Trump? Well, Mary McCord was a member of that team [citation]; all indications are that her background efforts continue today as a quiet member of the Special Counsel team that is still attacking Donald Trump.
To give you an idea of the scope of influence of Mary McCord as a key functionary, consider what we can document.
♦ McCord submitted the fraudulent FISA application to spy on Trump campaign.
♦ McCord created the “Logan Act” claim used against Michael Flynn and then went with Sally Yates to confront the White House.
♦ McCord then left the DOJ and went to work for Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler.
♦ McCord organized the CIA rule changes with Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson.
♦ McCord led and organized the impeachment effort, in the background, using the evidence she helped create.
♦ McCord joined the FISA Court to protect against DOJ IG Michael Horowitz newly gained NSD oversight and FISA review.
♦ McCord joined the J6 Committee helping to create all the lawfare angles they deployed.
♦ McCord then coordinated with DA Fani Willis in Georgia.
♦ McCord was working with Special Counsel Jack Smith to prosecute Trump.
♦ McCord is now coordinating a Lawfare attack process against Donald Trump in term #2
In short, Mary McCord is the lawfare string that winds through every legal ‘stop Trump’ effort, and her primary partner in this endeavor is Andrew Weissmann. It wasn’t Jack Smith per se’, any more than it was Robert Mueller.
Jack Smith and Robert Mueller were simply the front men of the Lawfare band.



Mary sounds afraid. She should be! 😡😡😡😡
My imprecatory prayers just kicked in again.
Jeremiah 17:18: “Let those be put to shame who persecute me, but let me not be put to shame; let them be dismayed, but let me not be dismayed; bring upon them the day of disaster; destroy them with double destruction!”
Double double, boiling trouble!
Afraid of what? Jeff Sessions in a skirt, and with a closet full of skeletons?
Maybe, but they have balls dragging her out of hiding!
Bankrupt her.
I assume you are referring to making her financially bankrupt.
Morally, she’s already there, via self infliction.
Also…I don’t think Pam Bondi has ever represented President Trump in his personage. She represented the Office of the President as part of Shiff’s impeachment scam.
Yes HC and that is what Bondi testified during yesterday’s hearing when asked to clarify the label of PDJT personal attorney.
So, do you think Bondi and the rest of Trump admin is going to screw us right out of the gate with a “okalee dokalee?”
If so, what’s the whole point of having these people be nominees in the first place? Ahh or was that the whole reason “Susie Rat” was made CoS/ whomever else made these appointment recommendations to President Trump? Catch him in a trap from the jump, eh?
For the sake of all our collective blood pressures, as well as the nation of course, either be clear and reject any recusal request or get the hell out of the way and take yourself out of the running for the office!
Good gosh. Seems we’re keeping Wilson sporting goods in business simply due to the raw quantity of footballs we need to let Lucy keep setting them up for us to try and kick.
Thanks , SD… as always.
/sigh
(click wrong reply)
We’re doomed!
/s
I’m confident in the President’s judgement. If we see it, he sees it. He’s been there, done that. He knows the players and he knows some have to be finagled, others can be slapped down on sight, while some of the known shady characters have to hang themselves, given enough rope.
Nothing is cut and dried. There’s a big gray area that needs to be clarified.
I’m with ya! It isn’t PDJT’s judgement or insight I’m wary of or questioning. Sometimes you get hemmed in, is all. It isn’t like their tactics haven’t been effective before.
I am 100% confident that Bondi is just another Jeff Sessions, and she will recuse herself. Trump can then put someone with balls into the job, and probably the person he really wanted!
None of the “professionally Republican” stepped up to defend Jeff Sessions against the demands for his recusal either.
Who says history doesn’t repeat?
It’s certainly once again rhyming!
Not that McCord’s face inspires poetry.
“Not that McCord’s face inspires poetry.”
The face that launched a thousand
shipsgarbage scows…….The mug that launched a thousand quips.
The green slime on the skow.
A face that could scuttle a 1000 ships
…and already has scuttled one administration
Well, there is that Mr. Ed song.
There once was a woman whose face looked like a dump.
What grew out of her neck was only a lump.
Unfortunately, Sessions was a plant though. He would’ve done anything for the establishment.
True – he was a southern snake. A real copperhead.
Great recap and summary… I am assuming that the “request” to recuse is going nowhere; in any event there are enough R senators to confirm Ms. Bondi, who I’m sure is too smart to fall for this nonsense.
The fact that Bondi mentioned Clinesmith and his crime by name in a public setting is likely what prompted the recusal strategy. They think no one knows what they did and how they did it.
Uhh no… How is Jeff Sessions these days? Don’t go there Pam.
They tried to make it out in the hearing yesterday that she represented President Trump, in his personal capacity, during Impeachment Scam #1 and that she should be ready to recuse herself. She clarified that she didn’t not represent him, but was representing the Office…big difference. She doesn’t need to recuse herself from anything related to their illicit activities.
Exactly!
Little Red Mary,
Red Mary Marxist McCord
Wish these people could see themselves.
Stalin would have been proud to have her on his side…….a sure thing for the Award of the Order of Lenin.
“…a sure thing for the Award of the Order of Lenin.”
Joe still has a couple of days to give her the Medal of Freedom.
Fraud vitiates everything…
Will it grant Trump and co the required testicular fortitude though?
DJT? IS THAT A SERIOUS QUESTION?
Where does THAT question come from?
The ankle-biting section.
BTW, has Joe pardoned her yet?
I guess we can hope and pray the Bondi and Trump Team double-read all the info Sundance just posted and probe deeper in the matter.
Great Job Sundance collecting all the ways in which Dem Corrupt Lawfare tried to destroy this country.
Arm up Trump Team, take out the Corrupt Trash in D.C.
Go on Truth Social and X and post it to Bondi and Trump’s and anyone else’s account.
just say no
One giant incestuous cesspool.
Mary McCord needs to leave D.C. and go somewhere where we don’t ever have to see her or hear from her again.
Same goes for Schitt head. Just look at him. Is he not demon possessed????
That’s what I see. Those crazy bug eyes. Maybe he’s dealing with more of an unclean spirit than outright possession. Peter Strock (forget the spelling) however was clearly possessed – maybe by a number of them. I wouldn’t want to be anywhere near either of them. JMO.
Look up the Standard Hotel and you’ll see just how unclean the demons that own Schiff really are.
AMEN!
Bug eyed because of something yuge, being shoved up his,…
I think the zoos are all full—worldwide.
I suggest prison
Mary Mary quite contrary, look at how your garden has grown.
Trump’s justice is coming, inside a jail you’ll be shown.
Trumpzilla
(to the tune of Godzilla (Roeser)
Lyrics © Christopher W Hyde 2024
With a winning smile and head of red hair
He rips bullshit trade deals down…
Adam Schiff in the Standard Hotel
Screams bug eyed as he looks in on him…
Trumpzilla!
“Oh no, they say he’s got to go”
Go, go Trumpzilla, yeah!
Oh no, there goes DC’s hoes!
Go, go Trumpzilla, yeah!
He picks up a RINO and throws it back down
As he wades through swamp to the center of hell!
“Oh no, they say, he’s got to go.”
Go, go Trumpzilla, yeah!
Oh no, there goes DC’s hoes!
Go, go Trumpzilla, yeah!
Experience shows again & again
Commies kill until they end….. Trumpzilla!
TRUMPZILLA NUMBER ONE KAIJU!!
HE STOMP YOU LONG TIME!!
Oui, Maquis!!!
It has been more than 60 years since I have heard that cadence, although with a slightly different connotation.
It brought back a lot of memories, some pleasant and some not so much.
😁
pam needs to investigate mccord, I am sure she has violated dozens of laws……frigging breach…
They keep using the same playbook. First move, demand AG to recuse (Sessions) then move to put a lackey in place to run interference. Surely DJT has anticipated this move. Dems are so predictable.
Good point!
Ya, put Matt Geatz in as special console.
So what’s the basis for the recusal??? Bondi knows too much??? Hahaha.
Typically, in legal proceedings, recusal is expected where, 1.) An advocate or trier of fact is so close to a party, generally because they’re a relative or are married to that party; 2.) As a result of a financial stake or interest in the issue. That, as is the case with Bondi, the individual previously was an advocate for a party and is now in the position to prosecute a former adversary doesn’t trigger recusal.
For example: I was a prosecutor some number of years ago and then I was appointed to a judicial position. I was required to recuse myself (in certain specific instances) any time a person I actually personally prosecuted may have come before me in a new matter I was presiding over.
There is no such situation Bondi as AG would find herself in. She was merely a legal adversary in an impeachment proceeding both Schiff and McCord had orchestrated. In fact, if Shifty Schiff was so worried about this, as he was stupidly pummeling Bondi on the issue whether she’d prosecute that idiot Liz Cheney, why didn’t he inquire into Bondi’s opinions on recusal? He didn’t.
But good to know that their line of attack (or defense), would be that Bondi would be required to recuse herself (and presumably the entire office of the AG). They’ll litigate this issue all the way to the USSC.
Comb through her communications, locate a few crimes, then prosecute / jail her.
This harridan has no right to harass the duly elected president in this manner.
Mary, Mary quite contrary how does your lawsuit go? “It’s all hate Trump and let’s hang his rump while our eyes just glow!”
What a sold out POS she is.
Trump just needs to borrow a few pages from the Clinton Playbook for Mary ?
She is a dangerous woman and needs to be “shock and awed” before she gets going again.
I really, really hope that someone will find a smoking gun and then prosecute her, have her law license revoked and BANKRUPT her with litigation… both criminal and civil charges so she can feel exactly like the victims of her witchery!
I mean, if I’m Bondi and if I didn’t even know who McCord was I would immediately start investigating her involvement in the first impeachment hearing and start kicking over every rock I could.
I doubt Trump is afraid of McCord. McCord is obviously very afraid of Trump.
“I doubt Trump is afraid of McCord”
First we need to know if President Trump even knows who Mary McCord is.
repost this article to his x and truth social account.
Really? You underestimate our President.
“It’s a little funny if you understand the background.”
Precisely my reaction. all due to the great research and analysis of Sundance and CTH these past years.
“Good grief, it’s frustrating to watch.”
You bet, knowing the 2×4 that could be applied to Mary B. (as in Bitch) McCord’s forehead if there were patriots in DC.
McCord better be praying for a Biden pardon…
A pardon would not stop her from doing the same things all over again. It would embolden her. Psychopaths take mercy for a green light to keep on with their psychopathy.
Did anyone call her our for her Treason, she shouldn’t even be testifying as her conflicts
She needs to recuse herself to flames of hell
Sounds like a job for, “John Reese.”
Time to get a good
‘knee-capper’ and get to cleaning out the rats nest.
poster girl for Salem Witch Trials
That Adam’s apple didn’t fall far from the trachea.
HAHAHA !!!
I Wonder if anyone might post or PM this thread to Pam?
Facts and Education is a wonderful thing……….
One can pretend better if they don’t read CTH.
You can do that on Truth Social and X. I suggest we all do that. It will get their attention. Post it to President Trump, Kash, Elon, Doge etc
Imagine what her COMMS might show the world if declassified and unredacted?
That guy is gonna get a haircut someday.
They don’t allow hair that long in prison.
Maybe she’ll transition.
My first question when I saw this headline was – Surely at least one Republican Senator pushed back on this? Alas, as I read the article, Sundance answered the question. Not a peep.
Here are the defunct Republicans on Senate Judiciary committee – LOL at all:
Lindsey Grahm – South Carolina
John Cornyn – Texas
Mike Lee – Utah
Ted Cruz – Texas
Josh Hawley – Missouri
Thom Tillis – North Carolina
John Kennedy – Louisiana
Marsha Blackburn – Tennessee
Eric Schmitt – Missouri
Katie Britt – Alabama
Mike Crapo – Idaho
Wooses! SPIT!!!
Remember this, when you are cheering because one of them put on a good performance of appearing to defend one of PDJT’s nominees.
Repeat after me;
“ALL the Republicon Decepticons in the Senate want you dead or enslaved, and think you are lower than pond scum.
EVERY SINGLE ONE.
Here’s a suggestion; these people McCord and company, have security clearances. First move by PDJT should be to yank those clearances and have justice order that these clowns be surveilled to guage their reactions. If they touch any classified information or transmit same, that could be a violation of federal law.
Maybe Snook can discover the joys of conjugal visits with this snake if she gets convicted.
Twisting an incoming Attorney General to recuse?
Sounds ridiculous right but
You have to recall this actually worked once for the Dims and Lawfare :
“On January 10, 2017, the Attorney General (Sessions) testified during his confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee that he would recuse himself “from any questions involving those kind of investigations that involve Secretary Clinton and that were raised during the campaign or to be otherwise connected to it.” When asked if he would recuse himself from the Clinton email investigation and matters involving the Clinton Foundation, he responded, “yes.” When asked if he would recuse himself from matters relating to an investigation of the Trump campaign, he answered: “I would review it and try to do the right thing as to whether or not it should stay within the jurisdiction of the Attorney General or not.”
https://oversightdemocrats.house.gov/news/press-releases/oversight-judiciary-dems-ask-doj-inspector-general-to-investigate-whether
It would come as no surprise to find that the same person breaking the law to push FISA/Russia, Russia, Russia had a hand in the Sessions pressure to recuse.
McCord was a big player in the Soros funded Georgetown Law Transition Integrity Project 2020……can you say 6 Jan?
Who Has Authority?
Some experts argue that “acting” officials under Sessions can’t sign off on FBI applications to the the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, or FISC, the secretive judicial body that reviews Justice Department requests for electronic surveillance. The acting deputy attorney general is Dana J. Boente, a federal prosecutor from Virginia who briefly served as acting attorney general while Sessions was in the process of being confirmed. Below him is the associate attorney general, but that office has been vacant since shortly after Trump’s inauguration.
Mar 4,2017 Newsweek:
“Further down the FISC warrants chain is Mary McCord, a holdover from the Obama administration who is the acting assistant attorney general for the national security division, which is responsible for counterintelligence and counterespionage investigations involving foreign agents and spies. Although McCord is a highly regarded career federal prosecutor, she could well be replaced as the Trump team reportedly searches for “loyalists” to staff key cabinet positions, especially if she balks at implementing White House initiatives she deems illegal or unconstitutional.
Sessions was spineless and also ignorant. He saw an easy way out, and took it.
Bondi is a fighter.
This one person Mary McCord is a highly effective weapon against President Trump, President Trumps’s agenda and the will of the American people.
Subversive is the best descriptive of Mary McCord
This goes beyond liberal thinking and support of the democrat party….she is an enemy of the USA and the only real question is who is she working for?
I don’t have a great deal of confidence in any of the President Trump people except perhaps Miller actually recognizing the danger of this person and her methods.
Subversive indeed.
Intimately familiar with the DOJ-National Subversion Division.
Bondi had better be a fighter, because today, McCord has thrown down the gauntlet.
She seems to be.
I hope I live the day that Mary and Norm do the perp walk.
maybe in a just world.
sigh
Mary the skank.
This witch has got to go
What difference does Mary’s testimony make? It changes nothing except maybe to make Mrs. Bondi even more resolved. The confirmation is going to happen. So are the investigations and prosecutions.
How did *snook* get this position working for the counsel to JR??!!
“Sheldon was working for the counsel to John Roberts. The counsel to the Chief Justice has one job, to review the legal implications of issues before the court and advise Justice John Roberts. The counsel to the Chief Justice knows everything happening in the court and is the sounding board for any legal issues impacting the Supreme Court.
In his position as the right hand of the counsel to the chief justice, Sheldon Snook would know everything happening inside the court.”
In his position as the right hand of the counsel to the chief justice, Sheldon Snook would know everything happening inside the court.
Including drafts of opinions. Sundance posted a while back that Snook was likely the leader of the Dobbs draft. A law clerk would be too new to the DC legal community to know what reporters could safely be leaked to. It had to be a long-term DC insider.
Thank you Nex! I think we are beginning to ask the right questions! Praise God!!! Fight! Fight! Fight!
Dude looks like a lady
All the more reason to hammer down and put these idiots in their place, a prison cell would be a good start.
The bad news is….
”…because they genuinely appear to be afraid of her”
.
The good news is…
They would not want to be shining a spotlight on this wretched woman unless they were desperate and could not come up with a better alternative.
.
The funny thing is….
Schiff and the democrats really believe that anyone is still listening to them in numbers that actually move the needle for them.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/media/article-14280549/MSNBCs-desperate-save-ratings-stars-flee-ratings-tank.html
The will of We the People is irrelevant to those elected by voter fraud. The only thing that matters is satisfying their financial overlords. Schiff isn’t smart enough to have inserted Mary McCord into the confirmation hearings.
The DOJ-National Subversion Division is a core tool of the Derp State, and MUST be destroyed!!
Hopefully Trump and Bondi will recognize this as the Jeff-Sessions-Two Step. MAKE NO PROMISES TO RECUSE!!!!
I am doubtful that she is a woman.
I prefer to avoid the appearance of misogyny and go straight for Speciesism; I don’t think she’s human.
Dante says about “people” like her in the Divine Comedy, that their souls are already in hell and their still animated bodies are inhabited by demons.
Ah!!! The Jeff Ssssions trap.
Which, apparently, only Mr Magoo would step into.
This is that part of the exam when the Dr. says, “ok your going to feel a little pressure”.
Karma will find her one day
Great article tying this swamp she-devil to everything. Mary McCord needs to be swinging from the gallows when this is all said and done. Traitorous scum and her ilk all deserve the same fate. Disgusts me that we can all put this information together and come to the same conclusions but the MSM is willingly oblivious to it all.
But now I laugh oh so hard; to see you swinging on the gallows pole!
In a galaxy far far away she would need a group of food tasters.
Pure Chutzpah.
Schiff and McCord are potential criminal defendants for serious violations of federal law. As such, they should have been forceably recused from participation in the hearing — NOT the nominee. What an upside down farce!
Exactamundo.
The Seventeenth delivered the Senate to the foreign powers that imposed it.
We are seeing the exact consequences they intended.