If you did not watch the two-hour+ video of Tucker Carlson and Andrew Tate [Rumble Link Here], you might not have the correct perspective for just how devastating this video is for the career of Tucker Carlson.
However, that said, this video is very useful in explaining something about Tucker Carlson that has been discussed, debated and argued on these pages for quite a while. First, watch the video. [6 minutes] WATCH:
https://youtu.be/tHAmpUyfyy4
.
Tucker flew all the way to Romania to interview Andrew Tate and present him as the victim of a horrible prosecution. Tucker went out on a limb to portray Tate as wrongly accused. When your entire brand is based on judgement and opinion, you cannot be as wrong as Tucker Carlson was in that portrayal of Tate. You just can’t.
Here’s the bigger issue….
This video shows something very important. Tucker Carlson is above average intelligence, above average communication skills, above average vocabulary, but Carlson also has ordinary and average judgement.
When your brand is established only on your judgement, and insightful opinion based on that judgement – and make no mistake the entire Carlson brand is completely organized around those two characteristics, you cannot afford to be this wrong.
With the evidence of that lacking judgement so clear, it then serves as a very specific and clear data point to reconciling other issues, like Tucker Carlson using the Twitter platform to showcase his Tucker Carlson Tonight broadcasts.
Readers here have long known my opinion of Twitter, and that analysis has equally applied to the current disposition of Elon Musk. Twitter CEO Elon Musk is teetering on the precipice of financial ruin as a result of the extremely unstable financial position of the social media enterprise. Twitter is a bottomless pit of costs, with almost no possibility of financial recovery without some major change in the business model.
The financial position of Twitter is the only prism that matters in the review of decisions that Elon Must is making about the platform. Free speech, liberty, safe opinion, the public square, all of it is less than the financial viability of the company. Every large or seemingly consequential decision on the platform is centered around the finances therein. Despite what might be the front face or intent of Mr Elon Musk, nothing else is more important, influential or determinative of his action.
Carlson’s lack of judgement in the Andrew Tate interview, extends toward and explains his relationship with Twitter and Musk; it’s just bad judgement.
Keep this reference point in mind as you weight the opinion and analysis provided by Tucker Carlson.
.
Andrew Tate is a pimp. Not the cool, hip-hop way; as in the loathsome, scumbag, low-life predator victimizing and exploiting vulnerable women. Human garbage.
So…you’re saying adult women can’t think or navigate for themselves. Do you consider Kamala Harris a vulnerable woman when she f**ked her way to the top.
I’m saying Andrew Tate’s own description of how he works is that of a classic pimp. Manipulative and predatory. He turns the girls out by convincing them to do internet porn for him? A very bad man.
Worth noting: This approach doesn’t work with all women. It takes a particular type of vulnerable personality which a predator like Tate is skilled and seeking out and exploiting. Fun trivia: Charles Manson was a pimp. He attracted and manipulated his “family” using these skills.
Why is there a statue of Michelle Obama on the round end table wearing a mask staring at Tucker.
Anyone who has not made a mistake in judgement of someone they just met please raise your hand.
I would submit that Tucker ‘s brand, like RDS and Musk, and RFK JR for that matter, is based on a false promise of being a “truth teller”.
Telling “the TRUTH” has become a highly marketable commodity.
BECAUSE the MSM, Big Tech and Goverment have instituted such a sustained progtam of (lets call it what it IS) mis, dis and mal information, they have created a HUNGER for the Truth.
The reason Sundances “little blog over in a cornet of the internet” has SUCH power, such REACH, and is consistently the most viewed on the internet, is BECAUSE what he brands and markets to a YUGE audience, is simply THE TRUTH.
The suppresion of THE TRUTH, has created such a HUNGER for the TRUTH, that many can exploit it, whether for personal gain, increased influence, (or “viewership” ) or to increase their bottom line.
I often refer to the clasdic example of Lindsey Grahams blatant exploitation of this phenominom in his ,2-4 minute rant at the conclusion of the Kavansugh hearings, BECAUSE it is such a clear example of a much broader phenominom; He SAID, on broadcast TV (‘FREE MEDIA’) what so many viewers SO wanted somebody (ANYBODY!) to say, “out loud and public).
And was actuslly wotking concurrently WITH those very Democrats he exhorciated with “God help us ifvyouvever get into power” tovenact a National Red Letter law to take away our 2A.
TC has not ‘exposed’ anything WE didn’t already know, nor had Elon; all thry did eas saybit out loud, and very selectively only speak PARTIAL “TRUTH” and what these charlatan “Truth tellers” DON’T say speaks VOLUMES.
Tucker is the Fox (MSM)
what ELON is to Big Tech,
What RDS is to the RNC,
What RFK JR is to thecDNC.
Love ‘the message’, fine.
But do NOT allow your gratititude, at FINELY hearing the TRUTH spoken out loud, to migrate to the TELLER of Truth.
LOVE the messanger, but NOT the message; there are all SORTS of motivations, monetary, influence and otherwise for people to CAPITALISE on this yuge market for the TRUTH, created by the sustained promulgation of lies, false narratives, false premises.
Just because someone is capitalising on this market, does not make them a “good guy”.
Embrace the message, if it is truth, but neither kill the messanger, nor elevate him to sainthood.
Exactly. I have never understood this Tucker idolation. It’s pretty apparent that Tucker is just some guy that’s trying to convert journalism back to what it was intended to be, and he’s beholden to nobody.
I guarantee you that Tucker would roast Trump in a skinny minute just like he did Pence if Tucker was given reason to do so.
Tucker didn’t roast pence , pence roasted himself
I watched the 6:04 video and about the same amount of time in the second video. For me, it just isn’t rocket science.
All these comments that say they don’t “understand”, have lots of questions, blah, blah, blah….
Sound of Freedom movie stats:
child sex slavery: 152BILLION$$/YEAR, worldwide. Add “adult” (17/18 yo and above) to that stat.
Anyone who wrote any comment here with any questions for lack of understanding what AT is doing….well, you are part of the sex slavery problem, including child sex slavery, which includes the precursor of same which is kiddie/adult port/pedophilia.
You are part of the problem. Disgusting.
Complicit.
That goes for Tucker too. If one’s judgment is so screwed that can’t immediately grasp who/what AT is, then their own touchstones are tarnished/dimmed in some manner.
Fine. You hate the guy. We get it. Now….what crime are you actually charging him with, and not the charges you think he’s guilty of?
it’s a good question. I will be following the court case in romania.
he has been charged with human trafficking in romania, UK and the United States.
I hope you tune in also. I mean, if you care to notice when cases of very wealthy people set up porn businesses and exploit young women…I mean, if you care about such things.
God Bless America
I could only endure about 3 minutes of that creep… Tate’s a psycho of the highest order, and that’s putting it mildly. He’s no difference between him and Epstein or those traffickers in the Sound Of Freedom or Taken movies, he enslaves young women and passes them around to the highest bidder. He should be thrown in jail and never ever let out. 😡
Oh no, a strong brash male telling men to not be passive. He may be abrasive but that should not be a crime, even if you are not a leftist
My comments don’t get deleted
He’s of the Mohammedan heresy, which informs his degenerate behavior (the legal stuff, I don’t care about red herring crimes), and which heresy’s chief appeal is its ease of observance; Christianity is much, much harder to practice.
His appeal to “young men” is a consequence of nothing more than them rejecting the hard solution they don’t want to hear, and embracing erroneous easy solutions that give them an easy, false direction and purpose while assuaging their ego.
He has a problem with women because he is a weak man and deep down feels threatened by them, therefore his desire to subjugate them. He does not have the virtuous character to marry one woman, be faithful and raise children in a secure environment. Very sad for him and those poor girls and women who get involved with him.
Attn website: There is no “e” in judgment.
But he talks a good game, doesn’t he? Pretending to be what he is not. I’ll give him that (except for the smirk, which gives him away to those with eyes to see).
Dupers delight… he enjoys being deceptive, & enjoys getting away with it even more.
He is a hustler.
Sticking to one woman has nothing to do w/ virtue
Not sticking to one woman, has much to do with the lack of virtue. Hers or yours.
Ego is the root of the whole thing, and inferiority complex. He hates women, too.
Not true based on the interview being referenced
Should have heard Tate brag about beating and raping women and advising other men that’s how to handle them to make sure they stay subservient. Out of his own mouth on Telegram. Tucker didn’t do his homework on Tate or he may have thought twice about interviewing him.
Having lived/worked in a “moderate Muslim” SE Asian country, this is how all muslim men feel. It’s baked in their religious ideology.
Indeed. I do know what you mean. I knew a few in college; I live in a city with a large population of Eastern European Muslim immigrants and I’ve seen how the women are treated; and I studied cultural anthropology, back when truth was allowed and reality wasn’t white washed. I found it interesting how Tate characterized the Muslim influx into France (testosterone-loaded males coming into a society of, I guess in his estimation, “soy boys, who won’t stand up to them). Well, I don’t think his version of “masculinity” is going to play well here in the USA. Real men AND real women will stop them. There’s going to be no Taliban in the USA.
I watched the interview and I actually disagree with this article.
Yes, Tate is a promiscuous Muslim, but his ‘faith’ says he can have multiple concubines. I will give him somewhat of a pass if he is seeking the truth and hasn’t quite found it all. However, his message on masculinity is dead on. my 15-year-old daughter loved it! I thought it was a great interview and I’m glad Tucker did it. If his career is ruined because of this interview then there’s something wrong with the people who are following him. No one’s perfect, no one is a god on this earth so to expect one on TV or the Internet to be a god and be perfect shows something wrong with the viewer. No one should be idolize, but there is usually some good that can be taken from just about anyone who’s trying to follow the truth. Truth is the only God, because it is God.
Having watched the entire interview, and also having never heard of Andrew Tate til the charges surfaced several months ago, I agree with Tim, and not SD here.
G-d but our guys are pure f’n morons. No wonder the left want us dead and hate us. WE would walk to the f’n trains. With you leading the way.
America is lost.
Amazing isn’t it? Tate incriminates himself only about a hundred times in that FIRST video and people here are defending him! It’s like watching people defend F’n Joe or Bill Clinton! Tate can not only admit in plain language what he is all about, but he BRAGGS in no uncertain terms. And people here come to his defence.
Tate is a scumbag, Tucker is the debate issue.
Tucker lets Tate present Tate’s best polished story, and that still carries many germs of Truth.
TV Journalism 101/
Tate’s a total scumbucklet, no matter how much he tries to polish his t*rds.
The only thing that surprises me, is that none of the girls families gives Tate the Justice that a Muslim actually understands in personal terms, “my daughter/sister”.
So no, I don’t especially fault Tucker on the basis of what’s shown here.
You only watched the first video, didn’t you? This is a sincere question.
Yeah the one where Tate admits to being a vile human being not worthy of respect. Yeah that pretty much negated all his slick pimp talking in the interview.
I watched both all the way through. I even watched Casey DeSantis’s video all the way through. I can be very disciplined.
When you watch both videos, something is wrong. He’s a fraud in one of the two? They both can’t be correct. Do I think he lied in the first one to purposely look like a degenerate? OR, did he lie in the second one to look good?
Tough call!
The first video is chopped up. No context. The second video is uninterrupted and loaded with context. Tate seems consistent with answers and discussion (in second video). How many here could avoid being subjected to false impressions if our world views were cut into snippets?
Do I think first video was made for the purpose of making Tate look like a degenerate? Or do I analyze his words in context with the broader discussion of second video? From two videos provided, I don’t find call tough at all.
The FIRST video is not chopped up enough to be dishonest. Tate spews whole paragraphs of dialog and many, many complete sentences. Tate showed himself to be a complete degenerate without any editing help.
The first video is not a two hour interview. Looks like Tic Tock clips. Big difference, made with difference purposes.
Some of these people did not watch the first video.
Some did not watch the second.
I think Tucker didn’t watch the first .
Both should be watched.
I’m a Tucker fan, but no thanks. Not watching this interview. Let me guess, Tate did not disavow his PHD program.
So you didn’t watch second video? I understand your opinion then.
Fact: no matter what he says in the latter video, unless he disavows what he said in the first he is a contemptible person .
So, since you watched the second one: does Tate disavow his Pimps and Hoes Degree? If he does,
maybe I will watch it. Let me guess, he does not.
Bob, I had never heard of Tate either. Listened to both videos in full, even had my husband do the same. I am surprised at the vitriol spewed at both Tate and Tucker.
Do we now need at litmus test for complete purity and agreement with our “side”, like the libs do? Or, can we still remain independent critical thinkers? Which requires us to accept people who may not be 100% in agreement with every issue.?
I also agree with Tim.
I watched the entire interview as well and also thought it was a great interview.
Tate does not hate women and his words are constantly twisted by the fake media.
You watch the 6 minute video?
No, he did not.
He speaks half truths. His prescriptions to problems are terrible. He believes men should step outside of marriage and women should not is just one example of stupid.
He is an online pimp he scams his customers on only fans too since selling and making online porn doesnt concern you.
I am with you all the way Tim. The lady that stirred this up is a nut job IMHO. I don’t get it. I watched this twice (maybe 3 if you count buzzed). I really liked it and thought Tate and Carlson got his side of the story out.
Nothing to do with being a Muslim. As a Christian I see no problem with having multiple concubines as long as your being honest, and have the financial means to support your kids .
“As a Christian I see no problem with having multiple concubines as long as your being honest, and have the financial means to support your kids .”
Does it matter what ‘we’ see as a problem, or does it matter what God’s Word says (or doesn’t say) is a problem? Who is in a position to determine what is right or good or acceptable — ourselves, or God?
The 27 books of the New Testament are the source of Authority in doctrine and practice for Christianity.
Fornication is having sexual relations outside of marriage. Is fornication a sin, or isn’t it?
Adultery is having sexual relations with someone other than one’s spouse. Is adultery a sin, or isn’t it?
We know that all Scripture is given by inspiration of God (cf. 2 Timothy 3:16, 1 Thessalonians 2:13, etc.).
We know that in order to be a deacon or elder (a.k.a. bishop), the individual must be a man, the *husband of ONE wife*, and the father of faithful children, among other qualifications given by inspiration of God. (cf. Titus 1:5-9, 1 Timothy 3:1-13)
For men who do not seek to be a deacon or elder (a.k.a. bishop), is there any Authority in God’s Word to have concubines, or more than one wife?
If there is any approved example or Authority for polygamy or concubines in New Testament Christianity, where is the book, chapter and verse?
OMG. Just the word “concubine.” SMH.
“It’s a “woody” sort of word. Gives me confidence!” -Graham Chapman (from the funniest Monty Python skit of all time)
“….vole….prodding…..recidivist……bound…..caribou……vacuuuumn…..loose woman….erogenous zooooooooooonnnnnneeeeeees”
I agree. If we are people seeking the truth here at this website, you have to be seeking the truth everywhere not just where you want it to be. Jesus made it very clear that there is only to be one man and one woman joined together in matrimony with God and at least one person as a witness. This is a bond for life and is never to be broken. Divorce was even done away with. Christianity does not support concubines in the least. I have just been forced to go through a divorce and it destroys the structure and stability for the children. Think about the children and what’s best for them and your heart and mind will be close to God’s way of thinking.
I know of none. However, neither do I see, in God’s Word, permission to have affairs outside of wedlock. Unmarried men are cautioned about the indulgences of youth but not condemned. All this hoopla about a man’s man speaking his mind but absolutely nothing about women usurping power over men or leaving their homes and children in the care of others so that they can “fulfill” themselves. Men are rebelling against the harridans that falsely claim the man’s rightful roles in society. They will find ways to fulfill their needs other than tie themselves to overbearing shrews. Just where, pray tell, is a genuinely Christian man going to find a virgin to marry in this society. They might as well look for a unicorn. The people who are finding fault with this interview are either feminazis or brainwashed simps. It’s a classic case of deflection and the pot calling the kettle black. Jesus’ words come to mind Let he who is without sin…….” Lots of stones being cast here without the character to back them up.
from the first video, not the interview. Tate: PHD. Pimp and Hoes Degree “how I met girls, how I got girls to fall in love with me, how I got girls to do webcam for me”
Is this good enough backup by Sundance? These statements by Tate has nothing, nothing to do with masulinity.
Any decent God-fearing man or woman should be offended.
Yeah Aley, Tate is a real class act (not). If you agree with him maybe you are the “brainwashed simp”
I am not a violent man but if some creep did this to my daughter he would be exposed to some toxic masculinity from me. I know he is a champion kick boxer and all so I am not talking about a fair fight.
when was his first video recorded? From my understanding he’s been doing this stuff for 10 years.
Tucker should have asked him about his PHD. “Pimp and hoes degree” Where he tells young impressionable males how cool it is to lie to women, tell them he loves them, and then pimps them out on his web cam.
I’m all about forgiveness but it I believe there has to be repentance. I know, so old fashion.
Well said.
God certainly didn’t have a problem with concubines and multiple wives in the Old Testament
that was 2000 and 23 years ago. Stop living in the past. Jesus coming to earth changed many things including concubines and wives.
“God certainly didn’t have a problem with concubines and multiple wives in the Old Testament”
Can you show where having concubines and multiple wives was in accordance with God’s will, or worked out in favor of the man doing it?
Not David, and certainly not for Uriah the Hittite. Not for Solomon, who was drawn away by strange women, just as Scripture warns.
When Abraham took Hagar, was that in accordance with God’s plan? Or was Isaac, the son of promise, born of the free woman (Sarah), and not the bondwoman?
There are multiple examples. Go to an online Bible and search ‘concubine’. It occurs 22 times in 21 verses, all in the Old Testament.
All correct.
Tate is simply another seducer. I have no interest in the fine points of his seduction techniques. Judgement Day will find the seducer going to his own place. Seducers are a dime a dozen. Yawn.
I agree with Sundance here. Tucker Carlson’s audience, IMHO, is largely comprised of upright citizens who are devoted to family and fear God. This interview is National Enquire fodder. I was hoping for more elevated interviews, along the lines of the original Firing Line – scintillating, not titillating.
“Provide an example or authority for polygamy “.
Bs on that
Where in the bible is polygamy outlawed?
And don’t use scripture Adultery and fornication..
Also a bit of a double standard if your a trump supporter seeing as he has been married multiple times, and has cheated on his wives.
President Trump was married 3 times and ALL 3 wives endorsed his Presidential run. He was never married to more than ONE woman at a time.
And he didn’t pimp any of them out on a webcam like Tate bragged about.
Come on guys, I am not getting the Tate love.
Right no double standard at all. Been a treeper for awhile never seen a comment thread with so many ignorant comments.
“Bs on that
Where in the bible is polygamy outlawed?”
Back to you, where is polygamy endorsed and blessed?
If you believe you have Authority from God to engage in polygamy, that is an affirmative claim, therefore is it not incumbent upon you to show whereby you have such Authority from God?
Or are you one who requires the Scriptures to be a book of Thou Shalt Not, and if something is not specifically forbidden, then you assume it is blessed?
Do you believe that will stand up to even basic scrutiny?
If God’s creation (man) was so daft that God had to spell out, specifically, every single thing that man was not to do, would such a book not reach to the Moon and back?
Can you find money-laundering or racketeering specifically forbidden in Scripture? If not, does that mean God blesses it?
How about child-trafficking? I checked, it’s not in there. Does that mean God blesses and approves?
Does God’s Word specifically forbid conducting a worship service like the one in The Blues Brothers, making a spectacle of worship, or does it say that all things should be done decently and in order (1 Corinthians 14:40)?
These things are not hard to understand, so when there is controversy, is it not because we are looking for ways to do what we want, instead of what God wants?
“And don’t use scripture Adultery and fornication..”
It is not for me to ‘use’ or ‘not use’ anything, I am not any Authority in such matters, but God is, and we are given multiple approved examples to reason from God’s Word, both by Apostles (e.g. Paul, Acts 17:2) and disciples (e.g. Apollos, Acts 18:28).
Besides that, what other Authority is there, which is greater than God or His Word?
The word ‘fornication’ occurs 36 times in 32 verses. The word ‘fornicator’ adds 2 more.
“Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.” (1 Corinthians 6:18, KJV)
“Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness,” (Galatians 5:19)
“But fornication, and all uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not be once named among you, as becometh saints;” (Ephesians 5:3)
I checked all 36 occurrences, they are all negative.
The word ‘adultery’ occurs 40 times in 33 verses, beginning with this one: “Thou shalt not commit adultery.” (Exodus 20:14, KJV)
I checked all the others, they are likewise negative.
Is marriage not instituted by God, between a man and a woman?
“Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.” (Genesis 2:24, restated in Matthew 19:5, Mark 10:7-9, Ephesians 5:31)
Can a man and two women (or three, or four…) be one flesh?
If a man is married to one wife, how can he marry another wife and have sexual relations with her, without committing adultery against his first wife?
Let’s take a look at the following verse:
“Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.” (1 Corinthians 7:2, KJV, boldface mine)
Plural, or singular?
What does “his own” and “her own” mean?
……………………
Own
1 : belonging to oneself or itself
—usually used following a possessive case or possessive adjective
: one or ones belonging to oneself
……………………
What does “oneself” mean?
…………
pronoun
…………
What does “belonging” mean?
………………………..
That which belongs to one; that which pertains to one; hence, goods or effects.
………………………..
“Also a bit of a double standard if your a trump supporter seeing as he has been married multiple times, and has cheated on his wives.”
Are you *not* a Trump supporter?
What double standard?
Who here has praised any other man’s transgressions?
I am not privy to the details of Trump’s past marriages, or the reasons for their ending, or who did what to whom, but God knows. Regardless, is Donald Trump encouraging (much less teaching) others to follow his example in this regard?
If we are waiting for a perfect man to lead the nation, how long do you suppose we will have to wait, and do we have that much time?
Besides Jesus, how many men in the Scriptures (or in this world) were or are perfect?
Have not all sinned and fallen short of the mark (cf. Romans 3:23, 1 John 1:8)?
And yet God is still able to accomplish His will through imperfect men (and women, e.g., Esther, Ruth), is He not?
I agree with Tim. I watched the 2.5 hour video. I’ve followed Tate for years as kickboxer champion to his latest addressing the lack of masculinity in young men. There’s allot more to this story than any of us will ever know. He’s really braggadocious, a potty mouth, ego driven, but spot on with the loss of masculinity in men. I know a number of young men under 40 who follow his life rules and work ethic. I do believe the USA, the UK and possibly more European countries are doing everything in their power to cancel and destroy him. They want to keep men down everywhere. It makes it easier to get to the women and children. I will continue to watch and see what happens. They extended his house arrest for another 30 days in Romania a week after the Tucker interview.
Ha,ha…really! that man earned my respect when he said he would go to prison if that’s what God wanted him to do to stand up for what’s right. What coward would ever say that? If his trust in God is really that strong, then I want more of that courage and trust myself. Yes I agree he has a lot of extra bravado and brashness that doesn’t go well with Christian morals and beliefs, but he’s a fighter, literally! If I’m not mistaken Jesus himself pointed out soldiers and fighters and his admiration for them on his short time on earth.
I think this entire website is all about fighting evil with courage, trust and blind faith in the justice and mercy of our God.
Also being a Muslim, I didn’t hear him defending Muslim radicalness, at least not in that interview. He seems to know the distinction between good masculinity and radical male dominance. I thought he did a great job of pointing out that women are very powerful, extremely powerful. We should all know this because even Jesus pointed out his mother is very powerful and we are to go through her to him for whatever we want on this earth. The dude actually defended the power of women used in its rightful place.
ANYTHING that “It makes it easier to get to the women ….” (9th sentence) is right up Andrew Tate’s alley, or haven’t you been paying attention?
Your idea of a “choice” comes down to a girly boy or an Andrew Tate clone? No Tim Tebows or Kurt Warners where you live?
He appears to be a class A- a-hole. Imo the issue is has he been falsely accused of human trafficking or not? Bottom line, he deserves a fair trial.
On second thought maybe he should be strung up by some angry dads
This is why we lose. You so want to be a democrat. Just f’n join up and piss off.
Are you a troll? really, thats the best logic you can pull out. I think everything I’ve said is diametrically opposed to a Democrat, at least their way they’re defined today.
When you say we, who exactly are you referring to? Are you referring to the men that are getting led around by the ring in their nose following the money and loose women? you’re right I’m not one of them.
I have noticed many times that a person who disagrees with SD gets attacked by a small number of others. Those others of course have the right to disagree with the first person but they don’t have the right to be discourteous about it.
I don’t agree with Sundance on this one at all.
What a weak, pathetic comment. You have nothing of intellect to offer. You are the one who should go and join the libs.
Seeking the truth through thoughtful common sense analysis is what every person should be working to achieve.
If you listened to the Tucker/Tate interview you would learn alot about 2 people seeking to get to the truth.
Did you mean to say that your 15-year-old daughter loved his take on “masculinity?” What did she think of his beating women as if they’re dogs, sheep, or cattle?
yes, my daughter loves the strong man, the well spoken man who won’t cave to the newest idea and the newest slander of what a man is. She appreciated that the kind of masculinity that he described would give any woman a feeling of security and protection.
We did talk after the interview and discussed that his actions didn’t seem to necessarily follow along with his ideals. this however does not negate the high ideals he set for good masculinity, it just shows he is a human and a hypocrite just like every single one of us.
i’m sorry, where in the interview did he refer to beating women? He actually said women were extremely powerful and they have a very important role in life, it’s just not the same role that is asked of a man. I heard him say that women were to be respected, that is, a virtuous women.
I don’t think he gets to decide what any woman’s role is. That’s for each woman to decide.
So what is a “virtuous” woman and does that mean that if, in his opinion, a woman’s not “virtuous” then it’s okay to not respect her and perhaps even to beat her into submission? Did you see the first video where he beats a young woman? Is there any place where he admits to that and atones for it, since it’s said he’s reformed himself? I haven’t finished watching the entire 2 hour thing, especially since it’s a bunch of bloviating. It becomes tiring. He’s full of himself and blowhards are boring.
My father, a real man, taught me to be a strong woman, to depend upon myself, and to seek out a husband who would also be strong, be supportive, and, yes, protect me, as I protect him. Women are not accessories to men.
I did not watch a first video. I actually watched the interview last week, the day after the interview actually happened, so I don’t know about any other videos. I’m also not going to comment on any other videos that I have not seen. I have also stated that his ideals which were stated in the interview, had a lot of solid points.
Between the Bible and our own God-given conscience, I think a virtuous woman is pretty obvious to anyone around. Just as anyone can see a good man by the fruit of his work, they can see a virtuous woman using the same criteria.
If it walks and looks like a duck, it’s probably a duck!
Honestly I think it’s the non-virtuous women who get so angry and flustered when ANYONE talks about who is virtuous and who is not. They tend to be the people who try to shut down any conversation about virtue. There are definite guidelines to virtue that are written in the hearts of all people.
You can’t devote a lousy SIX MINUTES to watch the FIRST video??? It probably took you almost that long to write and edit your comment!
And the passive aggressive presumptuous insults.
like I’ve been saying. I already watched the interview a full week ago, so no I did not think there was a ‘first’ video.
I will watch it, but if it is diametrically opposed to a 2 1/2 hour interview then I’m very suspicious that it’s not edited in such a way to make the dude look like a complete bastard and yet apparently millions of people are following him. what I can take away from the interview is that he’s obviously a threat to the deep state. Him being a threat to the deep state is a ton of evidence for me!!!!! it should be for you to my friend if you are a regular reader on the site!
we have seen the deep state sabotage their opponents on a daily basis, so obviously this dude is an easy target, but I’m not going to jump to conclusions that a rich good looking powerful person is a complete piece of trash that is thrown in jail without any evidence being brought forth. It’s smells very fishy !!
This where I’m not following the Tate’s ok argument. How can a self admitted pimp be qualified to talk about
any women’s virtue.
TY.
dude, the devil can talk in great detail about women’s virtue, that’s besides the point of THE message. If the message is true, it’s true, no matter who delivers it!
Trump delivers a lot of true messages, but do I hold him up for my ideological moral standards. Heck no, he lives a lifestyle that I disagree with on many points and he is definitely extremely self absorbed.
The real point is, don’t be so judgmental and throw out the baby with the bathwater. God even sent his only son and we crucified him. He was perfect, yet we are such a fickle and proud people that we murdered the son of God. Wake up and stop throwing a tantrum about getting a good message from a questionable person. Just take the good message and move on.
You might consider telling your daughter this man is not worthy of any respect. In the first video he is laughing about making women fall in love with him and then abusing them psychologically and possibly physically. This behavior is contemptible for any man or women.
He might say he was joking, not something to joke about, especially publicly.
It sounds like you may not have watched the first video.
we did not and we have no intention of doing so. He’s not being held up as a hero in a household, he just made some great points on good masculinity and not being used by the system. my daughter nor I felt the need to become a follower of this guy.
To me it seems pretty obvious this guy is being attacked by the deep state because he has a message that is an absolute threat to the elites controlling all the zombie idiots that are quickly assembling in this world. That’s all I take from the interview. He can live his own life, be a hypocrite and we could care less. We don’t idolize anyone because we know with every pound of gold, there comes 100 pounds of crap right along with it.
We’ve been trained in our culture to either idolize someone or completely tear them down. It’s called black and white thinking. It’s detrimental and it destroys any potential unity in society.
Don’t watch that FIRST video. It’s a whole 6 minutes long and you will have that many more minutes to pretend not to know things.
That’s cool but this is why some of us are so down on Tate. That’s why we are talking past each other. If you watched it you would not want kick boxer anywhere near your daughter. Promise.
If you watch the second video (previously above you said you had not), you might understand Tim’s point of view.
I get it. He gave a good interview. His comments in the first video cancel anything good he may have said in the second imo. I hate to use the Hitler analogy but I’m sure he said some things that we would agree with Adolph on. Still, one bad demonic sob.
I read comments supporting Tate that will not comment on his PHD program.
Virtuous and not virtuous women isn’t black and white thinking?
In the FIRST video he is actually beating a woman laying on a bed and asking her why is he beating her. Did you watch the FIRST video with your daughter?
You sure are pretending to not know a lot of things!
He did not let his daughter watch the first video. Good eye Tim.
I agree with you Tim. There is alot of good to be taken from Tate. I listened to the entire interview, I almost think the CT commenters did not listen to it. I feel as though they just parroted Sundance in his complete condemnation.
Just imagine condemning Trump because of the “grab em by the pussy” and the “made the hookers pee on the bed” tapes, comments that are horrible when taken out of context. I know Trump’s an alpha man, and I am not offended by his big time masculinity. I appreciate and respect him for it.
I do not know if Tate has committed serious violent crimes, but given that the indictment does not include anything that was said by him in the first video that Sundance included, the jury has to be out . He does look horrible in the segments that were in the first video, but is it real, and if it is, why isn’t he being indicted for those crimes???
Like you said Tim, no human is perfect, and seeking the truth through God is the best we can do, and it is what Tate is doing. I believe he is doing much good, and I chose to allow him to be innocent until proven guilty.
🎯
I am not saying he is a criminal because I don’t know. I don’t know if the woman beating video was real. I am talking about his Pimp hoe degree. PHD and other comments he made. Women should not be treated like this period.
Trumps “pussy grabbing” comments were made to Bushes cousin in private and not meant to be disseminated.
I will say, if he was on tape talking about making women fall in love with him just to make them do webcam for him, I sure as hell would not be “Evertrumper”
The world won’t be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who make excuses for them.
As a woman, I am appalled by Tucker Carlson. How could he not know what comes out of that guy’s own mouth, telling everyone, especially women, who he is? He’s a representative of masculinity? Don’t insult real men. Before he said it himself, I thought, “He’s a pimp.” It’s almost as if Tucker said, “Hold my Bud Light.” Did he really not know who this guy is? Maybe he’s missing the research staff he had at Fox. This is a YUGE mistake on his part. The guy may be innocent until proved guilty of whatever they charged him with, but after listening to him, it’s obvious exactly who and what he is. Can I say, sleazebag? Creep?
this is what I said on another thread. The disrepectful way he talks about women is all I cared about. His webcam business, legal or illegal, bogus charges, political witchhunt, whatever means NOTHING with how he speaks of and refers to women. Doesn’t Tucker have daughters? I know he has a wife. Spending time with a person like this is not a good look. I think that is what SD might be getting at….He is NOT a role model for young men.
I would argue back that Tucker’s intention is to just hear all sides of any story. He allows others to destroy themselves, or be redemptive… Depending on the eyes and mind of the viewer. I think it was brave of him to do this interview and I do not in anyway I think it is spouses Mr. Tates views or not. He’s simply presenting evidence for you to determine its truth on your own. I commend him for the interview and thought it was very Thought-provoking.
thank you. A real reporter doesn’t mind wallowing with the pigs occasionally to get a story.
Maybe so, but I think you’re being too kind. Tucker sure did a good job of pretending to agree with and sympathize with Tate.
I very much agree with your assessment. Tucker was just presenting this interview and you can take the good and leave the bad just like with anyone else.
Yes there seems to be a bit of binary going on here. No-one is 100% good or evil. It’s complicated. IMHO this complicatedness is a good thing.
I think Tate convicts himself but equally I think some of the things he says are worth propagating.
Yup, excellent interview, lots of interesting world views, and some things about women I’m not in agreement with.
I am an independent self made Olympic veteran. I would not be attracted to a man like Tate. I am happily married to a gentle, softer kind of man(albeit highly conservative). But I still think Tate has lots of useful things to say.
I also think Tucker made a brilliant speech last weekend at Turning Point. Brilliant and very important. So now we just throw him under the bus because he interviewed a controversial figure????
I will not play this game.
Love it! Yes if we do play this game, we’re no different than the other side. We are actually playing into the hands of the other side and segregating ourselves with black and white thinking. Who are the stupid ones then?
I saw it similarly. ALSO: It is very interesting that he was interviewing Russel Brand & Andrew Tate during the same week. The demographic of both of those individuals is the one demographic that the MSM Networks covet: 20 – 40 years old. When Tucker finally does land somewhere for $$$ his audience will be huge and sought after by advertisers.
Exactly. Awhile back I responded to someone’s post, who was critical of Tucker, by saying that I thought Tucker only represented Tucker. He is his own man and he chooses the people he wants to interview. I’m not dead certain of what criteria he uses to pick the people he interviews, other than someone who may be getting a lot of talk on social media for a while. but I don’t think that is the sole criteria that Tucker uses for choosing his interviewees.
I think Sundance is fair to criticize Tucker’s judgement to interview Andrew Tate, but that’s Sundance’s opinion and this is his blog. He invites Treepers to debate and discuss these articles as long as we are civil about it and bring facts and or reasoned opinion without sophomoric ad hominem.
I thought Trucker’s interview of Tate was unusual, and curious as to why he thought it important enough to conduct such a lengthy interview so early in his new Twitter career. But I still think Tucker has been very good in all his other monologues that he’s posted on Twitter so far.
I also was curious why Tucker chose the Twitter platform for his new social media career, but I assumed it was simply because of the size of the Twitter audience compared to all the other platforms.
I do believe Sundance has a very valid point about Musk and the way the Twitter platform management seems to be moving, so I’m assuming that unless there’s an agreement between Carlson and Musk that has not been revealed, i’ll take Tucker at his word when he said early on that he’d be there until things changed where he no longer felt comfortable being on that platform.
He’s of that philosophy, that backwards one, that sees two types of women. The ones you f— and the ones you marry. Sluts and saints (as opposed to human beings). I think Louie DiPalma on the old Taxi show illustrated it pretty well. I can’t believe Tucker sat for over 2 hours and listened to this guy. I haven’t had the stomach, yet, to finish the entire second video. Did Tucker ever challenge him or disagree with him?
The ones who are promiscuous and the ones who are not. Which one would you want to marry? Just asking.
Uh WOW. So it’s all on the woman?
The guy can sleep around all he wants but when it comes to marrying, he picks out of the virgin stock?
That is disgusting.
By the same standard,Tate himself is not a valuable person. Why would anyone marry him? And yet, let us guess. He demands a valuable woman.
I agree. Tate is no role model for young men.
He appears to be an arrogant punk. That’s enough. I don’t need to know any more about the “man”.
Tucker, man….of all the topics and people to interview…. I think you blew it bud. Damn.
I agree, but I still support Tucker 100%. He destroyed Judas Pence in Iowa. That’s his redemption.
Tucker certainly did do that!
I really don’t have a problem with Tucker interviewing this douche. The problem is did he call out the outrageous statements kickboxer made in the PHD video? I don’t think he did.
The thing is that this is what our society offers as a role model. With all this talk about PUA’s (had to look that one up), knowing that Tate seems to have recycled a Neil Strauss’s book to use in his how-to videos, is this guy an equal opportunity exploiter? iow, he capitalizes upon not only women who fall for his manipulations but also in the “Incels” he pretends to speak for?
getting to the truth sometimes requires one to get down in the trough and wallow with the pigs. stop being naïve and Puritanical.
Ah, yes. The old ad hominem.
I know. Not agreeing with Tate’s views on women makes you a puritan and naive.
Making the Stone Age Great Again
Amen.
did you watch the entire interview?
Tim:
I believe most of the folks on this site who are naysaying the interview, Tucker and Tate did not, indeed, watch the entire interview.
Knee jerk reactions showing one again that many in our country are incapable of thinking for themselves.
Your commentary on the Tate interview was spot on. I would like to thank you for taking the rational and sane approach to the Tate issue and the Tucker decision to give him a public forum.
Your thoughtful reaction to the interview represents all of us who actually think about the world around us.
BrianinTn
thank you. thank you for acknowledging that I am not condoning his lifestyle, his personal choices or any other videos he’s done out there, I’m just reacting to the ideals that he professed to follow and teach. They sounded like some great ideals to me and he is definitely fighting for masculinity in this overwhelming sea of ‘weaponized’ feminism that’s bringing the whole world to it’s cowardly knees.
We have all got to take the good with the bad, otherwise we’re just jaded losers wishing we lived in a utopia of perfection that only lives in our own head, but not the real world. heck, even Tucker’s cockiness and brashness drives me nuts sometimes. Neither one of those two guys is my daily cup of tea.
I did not watch the full interview. His comments in the first video were all I needed to know that he is a scumbag, to put it mildly.
Still, he may not be guilty of any crimes and should be treated fairly in court.
Yes Brian, spot on, And this is from a woman. As I said, Tate’s not my type, not a chance, but, I agree with so much of what he said in the 2 1/2 hour interview. Did any naysayers listen to it?
Or we don’t want to waste 2 1/2 hours listening to a kickboxing douche.
As of 6:53 pm, “Tim Pedry” admits he had not watched the 6 minute video and here you are congragulating him on his “commentary”, his “rational and sane approach” and his “thoughtful reaction”.
In your very first paragraph … “I believe most of the folks on this site who are naysaying the interview, Tucker and Tate did not,indeed watch the entire interview.”
Why don’t you bring “Tim Pedry” to account?
There are TWO videos comprising this blog.
One is 6 MINUTES long.
One is TWO AND A HALF HOURS long.
You’re holding people’s feet to the fire for not watching 2 and 1/2 hours on the one hand and ignoring someone not watching a 6 minute video? I expect this idiotic “cover my eyes and hope it goes away” from those on the Left.
What I am inclined to believe is that everyone has watched the short video. Some just want to “pretend”. I’m with Judge Judy here. “If something doesn’t make sense, it’s not true.”
Thank you Boogey. Tough crowd tonight.
Not everyone has a spare 2 1/2 hours to devote to watching this nonentity bloviate. I could hear the same just going down to the local pub and listening to a random guy blather on and on. Yes, I do agree with many of his takes on issues. However, that’s no coincidence, is it? He’s studied what to say, hasn’t he? Such are manipulators and they take great joy in gaslighting people. Who benefits? That’s always the question. I will eventually finish watching, but I seriously doubt that, after seeing 6 minutes and then over an hour into the second, I’m going to change my opinion. I’ve been “thinking” for myself for a very long time, just about as long as I’ve been “rational” and “sane.”
I already said, twice, I believe, that I haven’t finished it yet.
Maybe consider finishing it.🙂
I not only considered it but I’m in the process of doing it. We don’t all have a spare 2 and a half hours. Eventually, despite having to hold my nose and be bored simultaneously, to please you all, I will finish it. I don’t expect to be wowed by the ending, though.
Sex sells perhaps Tucker is doing the biddiing of his master – Twitter. They do need those revenues rolling in.
I watched this interview in its entirety twice. It was 2.5 hours long. I have no clue what the man said that was inappropriate. I am going to be honest I loved it.
What am I missing here? Tate says he was charged with human trafficking of women. The women were making non nude tik toc videos and he was getting a cut. He profusely stated he made NO money and the charges were bullshit.
I can certainly see why the Globohomo media hates him. He’s a strong male figure who tells young boys to be manly. He’s a little cocky and arrogant but I don’t care……..Again, what am I missing?
Yes, He spends over 90% of his time talking about “weak males,” and almost nothing about the Pick Up Artist stuff, which is a long way from Human Trafficking, yet most on here distort what he says like good MSM followers. They absurdly stress the PUA stuff as if it was 100% of what he’s about. Hey, he doesn’t even spend much time on extremist Feminism (which is DS), and masculine women. His Weak Male talks are completely on point.
The fact that weak males on here and the semi-Feminist women attack him so hard, and purposely avoid his main message is because they’ve forgot how much of the Feminist’s “I am Woman Hear Me Roar”. message was created by the DS and pushed by DS money (and Hollyweird). Why did CTH use a DS 6 minute compiled hit piece by “Vice” to attack him? Never, ever use a DS hit piece to front your opinion… never.
I rarely post. I read so many comments loaded with outrage histrionics bad negative energy contempt filled judgment. Something I myself have worked hard to jettison over the last 2 years. Judgment Fear Attack. Enough.
I like your take and logic. Cool head. Especially referencing the 6 minute video hails from Vice.
pinged my youngest – 15 year old undoubtedly male young man – “about Andrew Tate – I’ve never heard of him -frame it in 20 seconds or less – go.” He knew nothing of the webcam biz.
Answer: “he talks about getting a spine. Stop being beta males. Girls don’t like beta males. Can’t protect them. No one likes beta males. Calls things out. He nails all the politicians and scams like CV19. Dad, kinda like you, he would say if you’re gonna play corner (kid plays cornerback) play like Prime – fearless and smart – or get off the field”.
thanks for your post. Respect it.
Sparty,
As Trump and his allies shut down the DS money, paying for feminist propaganda there’s going to be a turnaround for all of this… may be fast, or slow, but it will happen. The smart ones in the Manosphere all say it’s about performance, and as men we have to perform all our lives, Stay in shape, climb the money rungs (without taking the DS Tickets), and generally have courage.
There are dozens of guys spreading the word, and most aren’t Pick Up Artists, so they cannot be attacked that way. Weak Males – Masculine Females the crap leavings of a dying DS.
Add-On:
Even in the 1980’s and before there’s always been Natural Alphas. DJT is an Alpha and one with a good personality. Yet many of the naturals arrogantly and cocky and this ups their confidence level. I knew four friends in their teens to early 20’s years as I was mentoring two of them with early working out and running. I knew the Alpha kid but had nothing to do with mentoring him. The two kids I mentored were slender, and one became fully cut, and his friend was semi-cut, and both were fairly strong in spite of being light weight. They were confident, but still had some beta conditioning. The Alpha kid was sort of slender, yet not near as good lookin as the other two. There was a fourth guy, completely beta, who was a sort of “tag-along ” friend. The older of the two I mentored inherited his grandmas old house.
So, one day these four were all hanging out at the house, and they wanted to know if it was M’s (Alpha Guy) big package that attracted all his women (they were in their undies), and it turned out he ranked 3rd of the four, with house owner being first, and cut guy second. and beta guy last. Yet this kid scored with women an incredible amount. later his “girls ” started hanging out at the house with the other guys, and this lead to drama and M actually getting angry, an it broke up the four way friendship when M got kicked out, and was told to take his ladies with him.
The two main friends were mainly interested in college and getting on with their lives.
So, M later also turned to making a good living , and got married to a nice wife and has two kids.
What kind of a person would even want to tell a story like that? What’s wrong with you???
I kept the graphic stuff and crudity to a minimum, and it had a point. The point is that confidence is the major thing behind what is alpha, confidence and courage.
AND THAT is your example?
You couldn’t use a war story?
You couldn’t use a sports story?
You couldn’t use a work story?
Same from my 21 year old. Just gonna say, there’s a reason why tiny snips of the supposed charging documents are fleetingly flashed on the screen. . Andrew Tate isn’t everyone’s cup of tea, but there’s no doubt that he’s being targeted because he’s appealing to a whole generation of normal young males who are tired of being told that they’re scum by a whole generation of young women of every ilk who are mostly, in fact, blatant ho’s. Both of my kids are in that age group and this a significant part of current pop culture and can’t be viewed through the lens of how things were before stuff like tiktok and OF. There are nuances to the way the current generation views and understands what Andrew Tate presents and represents that are completely lost on older generations unless you really talk to the young people who are consuming all types of social media these days.
You can’t see the hypocrisy of your last paragraph? You think Andrew Tate cares about protecting women? In your mind, Andrew Tate can make up for his mistreatment of women by instructing young men to be more manly?
Please tell me you did not watch the first video.
And yet Tate apparently built his wealth by being an “influencer” for “beta males” (aka Incels?). It’s so much easier to be an influencer (i.e., Dylan Mulvaney or pimps) instead of getting a real job. 21st century Hugh Hefner.
I guess you have to be a woman to understand. Do strong men beat women?
And this is a good example of what I’m talking about. If you’re referring to the vidoe of him “beating” his “girlfriend” wearing black lingerie because she didn’t correctly say what he told her to say, I guess I’m glad there are still people who don’t recognize fetish S&M webcam videos when they see them.
And you know all that how?
Real men do NOT beat women…period.
Enough of this punk.
I kick his garbage pail philosophy to the curb and down the drain.
Enough.
You fan-boys have at it. This is schlock…..!
Some do, but most often the women chose guys that beat them. I personally never have, in fact I White Knighted for my younger sister. I came home one night when I was 16 sneaking in the back door to avoid my dad as he had gotten physical with me several time from 14 year old on.
I heard a bunch of yelling by dad at 9 year old sister. He wasn’t physical, but she was white as a sheet, as he mentally was scaring her badly. I said, “Don’t do that, you’re scaring her,” and he slurred his words saying she hadn’t done her choirs. I told him he never did that to me me or my order sister at that age. He said something to he effect that how was I going to stop him? I got it, as this was all a farce to start a fight with me. He was drunk, and I’d been working out with weights and MMA for 2 1/2 year and had gotten rid of all the bullies over a year before. My dad had been a paratrooper, and could do 15 or so one are pushups with either arm. He bum rushed me like the weakest bully, and I used his momentum nd the heal of my hand to his face, and hurt him more than intended. I felt bad, as I cared about my father. the blow picked him up an inch or two then dumped him in a sprawled heap on the ground. I picked him up and he was talking about leaving. But I held him in my arms and said, “You’re not going to leave. You’re going to pull yourself together and do some right things. You don’t need to stop drinking, but you need to cut way back, and stop most of the drama.” I said to him that I cared and wanted things to get better between us.
Then I went back in to comfort my little sister and told her it was going to be alright and wasn’t going to happen again. Didn’t get much sleep that night.
Strong men protect women and don’t exploit them. You miss Tate’s describing how he would get women liquored up and bring in other women to convince women to bend to his will? It’s in the first video. Tate might be physically strong but he’s weak of character. Most young men want to find out all they can about their heroes. How wonderful it will be when they learn of his “other” business … and they will.
Another example of applying a generational lens to this discussion. The message that currently young men are getting from Tate is protect valuable women, while recognizing that not all women are valuable just because of their gender. Women have changed. They sexually exploit the crap out of THEMSELVES on a daily basis for money, and brag about it. They are the product of swinging the feminism pendulum of the 70’s and 80’s way too far in the other direction. I see it every day having kids of both genders in this age group.
‘exploit the crap out of themselves’
that could not be a truer statement AND all the other girls who aren’t doing it, wish they had the physical beauty and body themselves, so they could do the same thing.
Thank goodness there’s still some good role models and young women who see this self exploitation as it really is…females acting like hookers without being in a strip club. It’s actually female narcissism!
One would think that such women would be pitied and helped but certainly not exploited or devalued as human beings.
They don’t want pity or help. They are loud and proud and, most importantly (to them), rich. They are products of the Kardashian culture. They are not exploited or devalued by others, but by themselves. And they don’t consider themselves exploited or devalued but, rather, successful.
Just because someone will let you stomp on their face doesn’t mean you do it. I guess the Parable about the crowd wanting to stone the prostitute got lost on you.
They’re not “letting” you, they WANT you to “exploit” them for money. Obviously wanting to kill (stone) them is different than not enabling the behavior.
While the Tate the Pimp extols their lack of virtue. What a man!
Spare the virtue signaling!
These women know what they’re doing and they are fully responsible for their choices just like all of us.
Yes, they are to be pitied, but they are also to be avoided and their behavior shown for what it is. They are a bad example to all the young girls out there and they’re even a bad example to any woman who is susceptible to desiring more attention or money. They are even a bad example to men because they objectify women because of the scandalous behavior.
It’s all around bad, just call it what it is!
So it’s okay to lie to them convince them you love them and make webcam girls out of them.
Got it.
What about Tate’s behavior? Is he held “fully responsible” for his choices, or does he just get easy and automatic forgiveness?
Should Tate be “avoided” now that his behavior is “shown for what it is?” (Sort of like the point of this post? What’s good for women isn’t good for Tate?)
These women are a bad example for men? So the women are the root cause of men objectifying and exploiting them? Sorry. Men are “fully responsible,” too.
Many women go through what they call “the party years” where feminist tell them the can like males sow their wild oats. Yet if women get too high of a body count, then they have a hard time bonding to one male later.
Are males who are PUA’s able to bond with one female later, or is that not an issue?
I suppose Mary Magdalene would be one of those non-“valuable” women. And here I thought all human beings had value. My bad.
He thinks that the men get to decide who is a “valuable” woman.
It always has been men’s job to decide whether a female is capable of being monogamist, so it has nothing to do with value, as it has to do with if she’s still capable of paring with one guy, and sharing a family.
That’s hilarious! Women have to be monogamists but men don’t? Pairing with one guy and sharing a family? Like Tate has done? Does he share a family with the mothers of all his children? How does that work? Does he even know how many children he has? Does he have enough hours in his busy day to be a real father to each and every one of the children? It’s a woman’s job to decide whether a guy is worth raising children with. Too bad so many men don’t and even can’t measure up.
I guess that’s where we part ways. Not all humans are valuable, imo. Male or female.
Tate tells Mary M. he loves her and wants her to be his web cam girl.
Y0u gotta respect that /S.
Apparently.
Just wow.
If you’ve got something to say, say it.. This passive aggressive bullchit is tiresome. Guessing you’re female.
Lol that’s Mr. Evertrumper to you young lady. Just saying that’s quite a statement to say that a child of God has no value. I don’t think that’s our call.
It’s funny, isn’t it, how people make assumptions and how wrong they can be, even though they’re so positive they’re correct?
Why does Tate talk about his Pimps and Hoes Degree. This disqualifies him from being a roll model or worthy of respect
from anybody. Vice or whatever, his own works have convicted him.
Hey what are you and Sparty talking about when you mention “Vice?” What the hell is that.
Last week about this time I was sending this interview EVERYWHERE. Like I said listened to it 3X and was NOT offended once. For me to listen to a 2.5hr video that many times you better believe it was damn good. There was NOTHING that bothered me in that interview. In fact I found it encouraging.
Ugh reading more comments…..I heard none of this shit about him beating women on this interview with TC. I feel like I’m going crazy at this point. My liberal ex and others knocked the shit out of me lol (at least once). Never once have I hit back. When the last one decked me I was proud of her (no joke). I have a smart phone full of racey pics of her. She’s a school teacher. NEVER once NOR would I ever use those against her. Doesn’t matter how we ended. She trusted me to take them and that’s that.
I am so thoroughly confused at this point about this interview. Like I said listened more than 2X (all of it I thought) and it was fantastic. I’m just telling you who I am and I don’t put up with abusing women. I highly doubt Tate or Carlson would either.
Luke I don’t think you saw the first video Sundance posted.
First, watch the video. [6 minutes] WATCH:
You can search on “VICE and Andrew Tate” for some answers.
Amen.
You missed the first video where he admits to reprehensible behavior.
Exactly what I took from it Luke.
Watch the first video where Tate talks about his P.imps and H.oes D.egree.
That’s a hatchet job video. I guess the left and/or DS has decided to go after their two biggest problems in Tate and Tucker. This time they fed the propaganda into the far right. Be wise!
That is a possibility but it seems to me Tucker should have asked Tate about this .
I’m not in the Sundance is never wrong group, but he is not in the habit of posting bs.
I haven’t seen anyone say that Tucker confronted him on any of this unsavory stuff, like his PHD schtick and the video where he beats a woman (whether consensual or not). Why not confront him, like he does with so many others? It’s almost as if he thinks he’s found a kindred spirit. I hope not, but there it is.
Maybe this guy is the new “Roosh V”?
Roosh has repented, and returned to the Orthodox Christian faith.
It’s demonic, it started with fornication not being punished.
The ancient roadmap to destruction and we follow it closely because it was implemented by weak men, not women. This I know, women are followers and they will do what men ask or want. It is by nature and in a secure marriage it works. Without it is a disaster. Men are take advantage of the nature of women and leave a desolate carcass. They should be hung.
He says “strong man” because he screws many women without any remorse. He is a weak man, try marriage and family, you cannot and will not because you are weak in mind. CS Lewis describes them as “ men with no chest” no inner fortitude.
It’s also a gateway for homosexuality which is another much wider road on the road to hell.
Stick with the manual (Bible) and be observers, don’t engage. They will soon be extinct.
Really confused by your stream of consciousness filled with absolutes. Women are weak or something, then jump to carcasses then a link to correct life as family?
I disagree Sundance. No one cares about Andrew Tate and now that Tucker is off Fox everyone in position to cast judgment (fear and attack the other 2 warped minds) – as in TV viewers- are not around anymore – to go there.
in other words Sundance – nothing devastating catastrophic career wrecking brand diminishing about this interview and impact upon Tucker. He’s world famous has a long-standing fan base who is more forgiving than most.
that said Tucker has infuriated me in the past mocking an obviously manipulated election – mathematically proven fraud – slow to call out CV19 origination lab. Other things. Then he gets on a roll and mdd as he’s up for it. He doesn’t run away and quit. Far more good is Tucker. To err is human.
I agree. I’m also sad for those women who believe masculinity is toxic or even bad. Jesus calls God our “father”. He is protective and loving. Men can be this way as well and God bless them!
A good sociopath does this. Tate is a very good one. Intelligent, cunning, violent with those he subjugates, and charming in the interview.
Thank you Sundance for bringing this to the front. It needs to be known. I think he might know quite a bit more about corruption, especially living in Romania.
My wife immediately disliked him. She has discernment. I thought him to be a sociopath immediately. I doubt I would buy a used car from Tate. People need to get wisdom and discernment!
Good call.
The boy has crazy eyes.
You need to realize this is a hatchet job and you are being played. I have left comments on here tonight about being confused. I no longer am. This is a setup and Carlson is the primary target.
Spidey senses!
reptilian, really. just ask Eve.
I disagree with the premise of this article. I expect to be proven wrong about this opinion at some point-as I have often been when I disagree with Sundance. That said- my current opinion is:
Your message captured my thoughts Paul. Interviewing an ax murderer doesn’t make you an ax murderer. I would add that if the only people to whom Tucker gives an audience is people who are “singing the same tune”, he may as well go make tens of millions a year reading his assigned script on CNN.
Sundance’s reaction reminds me of the knee jerk demonization of Jordan Peterson a couple of years ago. I had never heard of Peterson before he was almost universally criticized. I read several articles, listened to podcasts and interviews and then understood why he was singled out for such vitriol. This article had prompted me to do some research and form my own opinions about Tate.
Agreed and there was a great deal of truth in what Taye was saying. Are we to only cast judgement and not forgive? I know I’m not God.
He might be falsely accused of human trafficking, he is definitely BAD. No one here is disputing this. This was imo Sundance’s main point. Agree this is not neccesarily illegal, but we should not be holding up bad people as thought leaders of any kind .
Couldn’t get through 20 minutes of this self-indulgent. Basically I have no idea who Tate is and I don’t care.
It was Tucker’s first and, hopefully, last mistake.
Get back to what you do best….informed political analysis, Tucker.
He is an Alfa male with a sick desire to control gullible women through emotional and physical abuse .
I’m sure he is a tuff and rumble guy but something is missing in his personality.
That makes him weak and there is probably no fixing it !
He wants to be an alpha male, but he fails miserably.
I listened to the whole interview. I am not familiar with this man. I saw him on Tucker once. There wasn’t any bit of the 2.5 hours I found offensive as a woman.
While He is not my cup of tea, personally, Tucker stated that He is not charged with Human Trafficking. That is a media construct. And we all know who the media works for.
I’m going to bet, IMHO, that AT, is a freak in the bed. And it’s obvious He’s some kind of kinker.
The Human Traficking charges look suspicious. And why were His jailers, so kind and sympathetic. Dummy should have shut his mouth, least a 3 letter, show up with some do-ray-me and change that quick.
I listened to the whole interview as well. Like you, I found nothing that offended me as a woman. Much of what he said I would agreed. I did find tone he displayed for Hamas a little too sympathetic and frankly jarring but he’s entitled to his opinion. I’d also like to know more about his fathers connection to the CIA.
I agree.
Grew up in a slum but with an absentee, chess playing Father with 3 letter involvement.
If anyone can weigh in, what exactly is the “vibe” in Romania with regard to women’s liberation? iow, are women living in a “macho” culture, still second class citizens so to speak, as in too much of Europe (imo), or are they seen as equals?
I watched the video when it came out and I disagree with you completely for probably the first time ever. You are taking clips out of context. I am a middle age female and Tate is 100% correct. We want a strong man to feel safe, even as we are strong and independent ourselves. Tucker did an outstanding job with this interview just as he has all the others. It isn’t fair to take a clip and ask someone to form an opinion. Disappointing, but whatever
From his own mouth Tate take vulnerable women and degrades them even further. How could a little creep like that make any woman feel safe?
The first video has dozens and dozens of “clips” where Tate degrades himself. It wasn’t one “clip”.
I found him totally despicable. My bile was in my throat as I watched just a small segment of this.
.
🤣
Sundance, what the hell! Why always attacking other conservatives? I mean even if you are a 100% right about this, why the attack. Tucker may not be perfect (just as you and I are not), but we need every voice that we can muster in this battle. I have noticed you to be wrong a time or two, but that’s okay. We are still here, because you are right most of the time and we need you. Just a few days ago I noticed you hitting pretty hard on Steve Bannon with your “frequent guest” asides. Here we are again doing what conservatives seem to do best, attacking each other instead of making a united effort to fight the real evil. Personally, I think maybe you did more harm to yourself on this than Tucker did to himself.
What instances have you noticed SD to be wrong?
Sundance was sure that Putin was only making threatening noises … but would never actually invade Ukraine.
Sundance has been right a few times when I didn’t expect him to be, like seeing the real DeSantis long before I did.
Are you seriously suggesting he has never been wrong? I’m certain he wouldn’t agree with you on that.
Simply asking for instances he’s referring to. “ I have noticed you to be wrong a time or two, but that’s okay” is vague. That’s all.🙂
Yesterday recent enough for you?
That’s rhetorical, btw.
Anyone that would say that about anyone is in a cult.
Well, right now SD is wrong about his prediction that DeSaster would move to “hug” Trump. (See yesterday’s prediction thread)
SD is wrong occasionally. But no one bats 1.000, and SD did point out how DeSoros attacked PDJT re: J6 rather than moving to “hug” him, as SD had predicted.
Point being….Sundance’s score isn’t perfect. But he doesn’t hold himself out as being perfect, either.
I guess you missed the hug on CNN ?
Where did I say DeSantis was going to hug Trump?
CNN
Where did DeSantis hug Trump?
CNN
See how that works.
Yet apparently, you missed it. Exactly the same way you missed the reality of Tate.
Sir,
I apologize if I have stepped on your toes. I am actually a big fan. By way of explanation, on July 18, 2023 you said to watch for a “hug” of PDJT from DeSantis. On that same date you subsequently posted a piece entitled “Ron Desantis blames President Trump for J6 Insurrection….”. On July 19 DeSantis had an interview with Jake Tapper, who was “oddly demure” vis-a-vis DeSantis.
Did DeSantis “hug” President Trump during the CNN interview, the day after he blamed President Trump for the J6
“insurrection”?
I must be missing something, and I’ll be the first to take responsibility for it. Thank you, in advance, for your first reply and any subsequent one.
Huge fan. CTH is so important. Hate feeling I am getting sideways with you!
God bless!
I believe early on he said Rosenstein was a white hat.
My point was not to be critical of Sundance. I have always been surprised how often he is right and always with so much foresight. My point is that even if you figure that Tucker was wrong and made a big mistake, what is the point in dragging him across the coals so publicly.
My impression was the one time Sundance said he regretted was his use of “white-hat/black-hat” to try and get a grasp of the players in the unfolding muh, Russia drama the nation was being subjected to so not really being wrong, just didn’t like how that use of colored hats went wonky.
Other than that, have not seen any time when Sundance was wrong, and even then, found the use of “white-hat/black-hat” a helpful exercise in developing my own lax discernment skills, so found it to be of use.
I don’t recall ever reading SD saying Rosenstein was a white hat. Maybe I’m wrong…can you provide a link?
Dennis, I could not have said it any better. Just Wow, spot on.
For God Sake, we must stand together against the real evil. None of us are perfect, but we all have a common goal to defend this country, our constitution, and to MAGA. Stop the infighting and the stupid litmus tests
Article and comments remind me of how Trump haters spew without concern for facts, only feelings. 🙁
Surprised me.
Put that scumbag Tate in a Romanian jail and never let him out.
Tucker must feel pretty stupid right about now. He obviously didn’t do his homework.
Because he is guilty without trial because of something some rap media outlet on twitter puts out.
What an UnAmerican statement.
I’m mostly new here. So I’m still catching up. So far all of the politics stuff I’m in sync with. But this article has me completely baffled. I’m yearning for more from Sundance ont this by way of explanation. Because so far I just don’t understand.
As far as all of the comments trashing Tucker/Tate, well, I just have to laugh. Having grown up in a Christian church, completed all 12 grades in a Christian school and then another 30+ years of developing Christian faith sometimes I’m left shaking my head and thinking “God, I hate ‘Christians'”.
For the record, Tate went from Atheism to Christianity and then to Islam. Why not stop at Christianity? Because he looked at the landscape and saw nothing but feminized p*ssies. Yeah, I know, that’s exactly the wrong reason to discount a faith. But I can’t say I blame him either. Jus sayin.
A stellar point. You are not the only one baffled I’m certain.
Sundance is giving us a look at all the players. Over the years as you follow you will build a catalog of information to understand how they operate. Data points. This is more about Tucker than Andrew Tate.
Thanks. I’m smart enough to have picked that up. But it can’t be more about Tucker without the focus on who Tate is. In other words, I’m hoping for more. Because, as it stands, this isn’t really a data point. It’s subjective conjecture based on incomplete information. Also known as a false data point.
I had wonderings about Tucker already. This kinda confirms them more for me.
Thanks as always Sundance.
I’ve given a lot of thought and had a couple conversations lately on what makes a person ‘gullible’… and another person not gullible;
we’ve talked about our astonishment at how many are still sleepwalking – in the wild they seem ubiquitous. I admit the few close people I talk with are on the same wavelength as I am, so we share a perspective the sleepwalkers in our default relationships/work/ family/acquaintences don’t seem to have.
What sets up or activates a Human’s BS detector in the first place? I’ve come to the conclusion that certain kinds of early or very early trauma sets up a capacity for discernment/distrust of certain kinds of danger or threat which other people don’t have. Whatever is normalized early tends to remain ‘normal’ to a person later in life – early life is a period of programming, either deliberate or by default; for good, bad, or indifferent, results.
Tucker admits he enjoyed a privileged upbringing – probably had minimal trauma very early/early life and was exposed to a very infrequent, low-level of ‘facing interpersonal danger/being preyed upon/getting burned’ growing up… that’s what ‘privileged’ means = having all needs met, many advantages = facilitation for optimal development. Taught by his experience to Trust what people say, I suppose… as he has admitted in the past to Trusting people and finding out different later.
Hundreds of people – if not thousands – will send him this compilation… I’m staying curious about his reaction/response.
Owning this mistake & apologizing will not ‘end his career’… not accepting accountability will boomerang very badly, IMO.
What ever will he do with this bit of Bright Sunlight?
Tuckers mother abandoned him at a very early age, never to see him or his brother again. While he may have been privileged, he was not exempted from trauma. I’m not attempting to argue your comment….just wanted to make the one point.
Thanks… I’ve never heard details about his very early/early experiences… only I’ve heard he himself say he ‘had a privileged upbringing’.
Trauma is both: having things happen that are painful & should not happen, AND having things withheld that one needs and that should happen.
Losing one’s mother IS Trauma with a capital T.
He thinks it would be great if UK was Islamacized! (watch King Chuckles, Archbishop Wishywashywelby, and Mayor Khan help him!) Heck it’s halfway there in Bradford, Luton, Leeds, Manchester, Telford, Rochdale, Rotherham, East End, Croydon, Knightsbridge, Ramsgate, Bristol, Cardiff….
He is MAGA all the way /S.
I have always said that Tucker ain’t straight… he is hinky… Your explanation is more concise and I agree. Thank you.
Even as these comments are being written, our own education system is engaged in a push to marginalize, degrade and undermine masculinity. The commenters who disagree with Tate are complicit in this atrocity. God never meant for men to be subjugated to women in any way. Tate is just the natural consequence of a society that has debased itself. The consequences will follow swiftly.
I disagree with Tate on is PHD philosophy, not his statements about attacks on masculinity. His statements in the first video show he does not understand that a real man loves God and does not treat women or men this way even is he thinks they lack virtue.
Thank you, Sundance. I was fooled by Tate during Carlson’s interview. Carlson does have poor judgement, duly noted.
me too!
Here you go Sundance. Got em turning on Tucker, for sure. That will help our cause. I think that today my despair has deepened.
You can’t blame Sundance for Tucker’s poor interview. If Tucker had asked hard questions of Tate instead of letting Tate paint his American pie image, Tucker’s viewers would have been prepared that there is some unsavory material out there. Instead, Tucker allowed the one sided presentation and never brought up anything negative. That is Tucker’s fault.
Even if everything in the first video is false, Tucker should have brought it up. Interviewers do that all the time. It can be done in a non-hostile way. Like I said before, many of Tucker’s viewers only watch Fox News and this is their only exposure to Tate and when their liberal friends send the the 6 minute VICE video SD posted, they will be blindsided.
It was p*ss poor interview by Tucker. I’m not saying I believe VICE interview…I honestly don’t care enough about AT to spend my limited time researching it. But I did learn one thing watching the long Tucker interview and the 6 minute Vice one. Tucker didn’t tell the whole story but SD did. SD was the one who gave both, letting the viewer decide.
Like so many here Lisa, you kinda miss the point. Whatever Andrew Tate is or isn’t matters very little. What matters is a corrupt US government, corrupt elections, corrupt national law agencies, WEF and world government control over our lives, massive inflation, open borders, population control, human sex trafficking, etc. And here we are spending all this time savaging Tucker Carlson. Tell me the point in that. We gotta have more on our side beside Donald Trump and SD.
And Tucker spent all that time interviewing Tate instead of interviewing someone about the issues you mention. Consider also all the time all of us are wasting by watching and discussing it. All the issues you mention are where we need to be focused.
What’s even sadder is all Tate cares about is money and Tucker just helped him make a whole bunch more.
I think some of the commenters here skipped the 6 minute “PHD” video.
Without a doubt!
If getting lied to was “devastating” to a career then all of the NYT & WAPO reporters who reported about Trump/Russia would have been fired.
I think tucker is correct. Tate is innocent. I think sundance is wrong bc to understand tate you must first see his quandry is based on how he shows the world how women act maliciously and are now completely unhinged.
Ill wager most of the people who are saying tate is wrong are married and out of the dating pool and have been for decades.
Tate exposed the fallacy of covid. They just moved to a place that didn’t have lockdowns. They showed the world they didn’t have to be locked down. They could just leave.
If you think that corruption (low level) is bad than you have zero concept of the world and human nature.
You happily pay to have your car inspected so that it is roadworthy yet do not see that not once has the govt ensured that the roads are kept car worthy.
it is another form of magical thinking.
Tucker is dead to rights on reality. While many who thinks the laws in society are to protect the citizens are the ones that do not see.
Tate shows you a way to not play the game as the house always wins.
What did you think the FIRST video was all about? Are you thinking all those clips are outtakes from a Netflix sitcom?
“how he shows the world how women act maliciously”
How “women” act maliciously? And he shows that how? By acting malicious towards women?
On my list of things that I worry about, worrying about Tucker’s career is near the bottom.
Tucker was the first of the conservative voices on Fox who said Trump lost the election. He lost me at that point. He says some good things but helped sweep the election fraud under the rug back when we needed honest voices.
Not only did Tucker say that but he was very explicit about how he hated Trump.
This sounds like fantasy or wishful thinking. Tuckers popularity is through the roof.
noting:
https://www.diicot.ro/mass-media/4082-comunicat-de-presa-2-20-06-2023
you will need to translate from romanian to english.
I am looking for the actual charging indictment…but so far this is all I can see.
God Bless America
You will see if you read the snips from the 6 minute video of the allegations against Tate, along with the translation of the article you linked, that the Romanian prosecution is trying to say that the “physical abuse” and “rape” are the acts depicted on the webcam videos, which Tate maintains were voluntary.
The physical abuse clip may have been play acting. The PHD program speaks for itself and I believe he was being honest and evilly influenced many young males.
I don’t hear any Tate fans hear defending his comments on the first video. So….
Tucker’s decision to engage in an extensive interview with Tate does seem unwise if he cares about his own reputation and his viewer’s perceptions of him.
We are all imperfect. Some more than others.
Tate is a clever man and to some a charismatic bloviator who makes many cogent and insightful comments. But how many friends or family members do you know or would you continue to endear if you saw an identical 6 minute Tate like video of them. It is not one short clip out of context.
Tucker seems to have been inculcated by Tate’s manipulative “charisma” and professional salesmanship.
Imo, there is no possible way in the world that Carlson doesn’t know exactly who Tate is. He is huge in male GenZ pop culture. He is everywhere on Tictok and has been for some time.
Note–“a charismatic bloviator who makes many cogent and insightful comments.”
But certainly not in the video. How many fathers would love to know their daughter is going on a date or a job with him?
Manspreading across from each other w/a Gorilla in the room. Not a very pretty photo.
“Manspreading”? Is that a bad thing? Should they have their legs politely crossed at the ankles?
They were bodily mirroring each other. Notice both with the sock-less loafers. Was an amusing visual…
sockless loafers is a thing…agreed. Calling men sitting with their legs open “manspreading” and saying it’s “not very pretty” is woke speak, just like “mansplaining” is.
Which just goes to illustrate that perhaps Tucker does feel or want a kinship with Tate?
Us “Nice Guys who always finish Last in Life” just can’t comprehend ANY Woman “Falling for this guy’s line of Shit”!
I’m NOT Totally Naive in the Real World, as I like a lot of singles, used to go out 3 nights a week to singles bars till I was in my 40’s.
I don’t know of a single woman who not “run from this guido” if he approached her, with these type of “Pickup Lines”! At best a guy like this would have to go to the “Ethnic Side of Town” to get his victims & they certainly wouldn’t be “Models, Bunnies or Amatuer Actresses”! LOL! They probably would be “Crack Whores or Winos” who have already lost all of their “moral standards & self-esteem”!
NOW, Maybe women are different over in Europe & since I never travelled out of NA, I guess I’ll never know.
I’m thinking of Hunter Biden for some reason. Is this a way to help explain away his foibles, too?
That’s because MAGA is being gaslighted Tucker is what they wanted from Desantis. He is making himself MAGA alternate for when they arrest Trump. Everyone focused on Ron as the all money is being set to get Tucker elected. Watch Tuckers turning point speech it looks very familiar. Firing Tucker made him a hero to many MAGA people. Tucker is the true play as they learned from Rons botched attempt.
It’s all about the 90million views
I honestly don’t think Tucker has any desire to delve into politics, as a politician. Please give America First/MAGA supporters some credit. We support President Trump 100%, which is why they are going full throttle LAWFARE against him. They are scared.
Tucker destroyed Judas Pence in Iowa, so he has earned redemption imho.
I view Tate no different than I do Joe Francis of Girls Gone Wild, who by the way was convicted of attempted kidnapping. The are both pimps who profit off vulnerable women
The edited parts of video are from 2016. He admitted to saying dumb stuff in the past.
Do you know that the same woman that accuses him of human tr*fficking has accused 7 OTHER MEN, and one of them ended his life because of that.
Her name is Emma Aida Gabbey and the guys name is Dustin Milner.
I also believe charges are to more recent events and he’s cleaned up since his past from 2016…..like he matured but who’s to say he’s not just not grifting…..
That’s why we have innocent until proven guilty
https://www.google.com/search?q=Dustin+Milner+died&client=ms-android-google&source=android-browser&ei=-JG4ZJHoCKar5NoPusCbuAE&oq=Dustin+Milner+died&gs_lp=EhNtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1zZXJwIhJEdXN0aW4gTWlsbmVyIGRpZWRI5zFQyw1YwydwAHgAkAEAmAH6AaABtAeqAQUyLjIuMrgBA8gBAPgBAcICDhAAGIAEGLEDGIMBGLADwgIHEAAYAxiwA8ICBxAAGB4YsAPCAgsQABiKBRiGAxiwA8ICCxAAGIkFGKIEGLADwgIEEAAYA8ICBhAAGBYYHsICCBAAGIoFGIYDwgIFECEYoAHiAwQYASBBiAYBkAYI&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-serp#ip=1
ha ha ha. I knew this day would come!
I have no animosity against Tucker but from the first time I saw that contorted face he puts on, furrowed brow and tilted head, I was like, OMG this guy is not my guy.
Whatever.
This episode was a real step down from the high-quality conversation featured in the Kanye interview.