If you did not watch the two-hour+ video of Tucker Carlson and Andrew Tate [Rumble Link Here], you might not have the correct perspective for just how devastating this video is for the career of Tucker Carlson.
However, that said, this video is very useful in explaining something about Tucker Carlson that has been discussed, debated and argued on these pages for quite a while. First, watch the video. [6 minutes] WATCH:
https://youtu.be/tHAmpUyfyy4
.
Tucker flew all the way to Romania to interview Andrew Tate and present him as the victim of a horrible prosecution. Tucker went out on a limb to portray Tate as wrongly accused. When your entire brand is based on judgement and opinion, you cannot be as wrong as Tucker Carlson was in that portrayal of Tate. You just can’t.
Here’s the bigger issue….
This video shows something very important. Tucker Carlson is above average intelligence, above average communication skills, above average vocabulary, but Carlson also has ordinary and average judgement.
When your brand is established only on your judgement, and insightful opinion based on that judgement – and make no mistake the entire Carlson brand is completely organized around those two characteristics, you cannot afford to be this wrong.
With the evidence of that lacking judgement so clear, it then serves as a very specific and clear data point to reconciling other issues, like Tucker Carlson using the Twitter platform to showcase his Tucker Carlson Tonight broadcasts.
Readers here have long known my opinion of Twitter, and that analysis has equally applied to the current disposition of Elon Musk. Twitter CEO Elon Musk is teetering on the precipice of financial ruin as a result of the extremely unstable financial position of the social media enterprise. Twitter is a bottomless pit of costs, with almost no possibility of financial recovery without some major change in the business model.
The financial position of Twitter is the only prism that matters in the review of decisions that Elon Must is making about the platform. Free speech, liberty, safe opinion, the public square, all of it is less than the financial viability of the company. Every large or seemingly consequential decision on the platform is centered around the finances therein. Despite what might be the front face or intent of Mr Elon Musk, nothing else is more important, influential or determinative of his action.
Carlson’s lack of judgement in the Andrew Tate interview, extends toward and explains his relationship with Twitter and Musk; it’s just bad judgement.
Keep this reference point in mind as you weight the opinion and analysis provided by Tucker Carlson.
.
Honestly, I think the man can interview whoever he wants. Even the undesirables.
Can Someone tell me why it was such a mark to interview Andrew Tate?
sundance, take the rest of the week off.
Your article flew right over the heads of your readers based on their comments! It must gore your ox when that happens.
All about the Benjamins?
This is a bold article given Tucker’s massive popularity.
I would have chosen to wimp out and add a question mark to the article’s headline–“A Devastating Video for the Career of Tucker Carslon?” rather than predict it.
All respect to Sundance but…despite how big a douche that Tate is…how is it Tucker’s fault? Proper journalism requires getting all points of view.
So,excuse me,but charges by the state must be true?
No, certainly not. If Tate beats the charges would you want the Tate from Video#1 or Video #2? Are they the same person? When someone tells you who they are … believe them!
I couldn’t stand to waste 2 & 1/2 hours of my time before watching the 6 minute video.
And I only watched that because I just have the vague disgust of Tate and thought SD could inform me.
I feel like I need to go wash my brain with bleach and I am not a pearl clutcher in the least.
I’m sorry, I just cannot watch the longer interview.
I remember being not thrilled when I saw it posted.
I usually am driven to hear firsthand but the check in my spirit on this one is HUGE.
And now I wish I could delete my comment.
I don’t really want any part of this discussion.
I kept hoping there would be a car chase in that long video and maybe Tate would drive over a cliff. Spoiler Alert: He lives.
This is the guy that has a Brother connected to him in some human trafficking
scheme .
I read about this guy several months ago .. then saw that Tucker was interviewing him .
I had no idea why !
No , I didn’t watch Either video . I’ve heard Enough
of Andrew Tate in what he stated himself ,
that I read .
Not sure where the Defense of Tate comes in .
Still wondering Why Tucker spent time interviewing him .
This guy is a predator and a punk . In My Opinion .
THIS VIDEO IS SPLICED (top)…..please watch the real one (2nd one I THINK SMH lol) and listen to the whole thing. Great job SD I literally feel like I am going crazy after you posted this article.
Guys I watched this 3x last week and sent it to everyone I know. There was nothing wrong with at all UNLESS Tate snuck something in at the very end. I don’t think he did though. He was very humble throughout the interview IMHO. Hell I sent it to my niece and nephew. LOL this has been very strange. I’m a good dude (self proclaimed) and I would have no part with abusing women or children!! That’s not my thing.
Here is the video I watched about 3X a week ago. Please tell me what is wrong with any of this.
https://rumble.com/v2zh1vs-tucker-carlson-on-twitter-ep.-9-71123-the-andrew-tate-interview.html
Next on the sundance chopping block – Bannon.
Both Tucker and Bannon are opportunists that have turned on Trump in the most vile ways.
And both threw in with the dimwit Charlie Kirk. Talk about lack of judgement, oy vey.
That is not true– why are you saying Bannon turned on Trump? Stop it. He didn’t.
Considering the conservative youth movement that Kirk has developed among colleges that has grown into a recognized political group, I wouldn’t label Kirk as a dimwit. Perhaps a little immature and lacking seasoned insights, he certainly isn’t a dimit. And I watch/listen his show nearly every day on America’s Voice following Bannon’s Warroom as I’m working in my garden and I see Kirk not turning on Trump but instead asking questions and not blindly following the bunch. What’s your beef against Kirk? Making a wild ass comment is hardly one founded in fact or truth. Cough up some examples… And as for Bannon, he’s on a mission – take America back. I don’t see him as turning on Trump either. But hey, you’re entitled to your opinion, flawed that it may be.
What? Loool
What? loool Moronic dimwit.
Charlie/TPUsa buys time on the network, as do several people I don’t like. He does NOT work for Bannon.
And what on the hell did YOU do all during the lockdowns, during election, etc., when Bannon was creating a place where Deplorables could know what was going on? Or rescue Andrew Breitbarts fledgling news site after he was killed? At almost 70 years of age, working at least 12 hours/day, usually more.
Yeah, tell us. Yawn.
Oh, so who’s left that meets yours and Sundance’s standard? Last I checked President DJT and Bannon have no beefs. None. Bannon was invited to be at Trump’s screening of Sound of Freedom at Bedminster NJ And Charlie Kirk has done great things bringing in the youth to the MAGA movement. Tucker is on fire 🔥 and Tate speaks truth and common sense in that interview. Don’t be a couple of whinnying hyenas throwing mud. It’s so unbecoming. And remember just cause you don’t like people doesn’t mean your smears are correct.
I watched both videos. Sundance observed that Tucker’s judgment is not as developed as his other skills. I agree. Many unsuspecting fans will watch this interview with little to no knowledge of Andrew Tate. They will have no reason to question the interview and be easily manipulated by Tate with his preaching about boys manning up. Later they will realize that Tate is not the man he professes to be. Tucker’s fans will feel misled by Tucker or question their loyalty to him. This was Not a smart move for Tucker. Sundance watches and makes these assessments after more than just one observation. Thanks for the heads up Sundance. You are the best!
from busting wide open the J6 mythology, to outing the FBI and Ray Rpps, to this interview? Aside from what I think of Tate, this is not cool.
Watching both videos is indispensable because neither can be reconciled with the other. One is a counterfeit of the truth, and the other is truth itself.
You be your own judge.
Because I haven’t followed Tate like some others have, I won’t offer any opinion re the truth about him, other than that this interview is an extraordinary look into the mind and heart of a purported monster. All that I can say is, and I say this with utter certainty, I will never forget this interview.
So true, neither video can be reconciled. Watching Tate during Tucker interview, after watching Tate define what PHD is in his world (in the other video), I conclude, I just witnessed a genuine narcissist and, yes, a monster. And it was very frightening how I found myself hanging on his every word and feeling the need to shake him off afterwards as though I was just exposed to filth and a master of manipulation, so much so that even Tucker fell for him. I too will never forget the Tate interview. Had never heard of Tate before this.
“I was just exposed to filth and a master of manipulation,”
Could it just possibly be that Carlson wanted that exposure? I, too, had never heard of Tate, but I got the subtext of this interview fairly quickly. And that was, you can interview someone whose views you don’t agree with and you can without attacking them, bring to light things that are undesirable about their character, while maintaining their innocence as a matter of law.
You can also find that some portion of their thought is actually right (about masculinity under attack) and should be heard. This is not about being right or wrong. This is about presenting viewpoints.
I watched the 2 1/2 hour interview; it only took 6 minutes to shame me for wasting 2 hours and 24 minutes before seeing the real interview!
Oh my gosh, yes. Thank you for this. And true what you’re saying. I knew nothing about Tait. Watched the interview and actually took small clips and send them to my 25 and 27 year old sons because I liked what he had to say about working hard and being accountable. But ewe, Seeing this other clip about Tate just shows you how evil can be manipulated to appear good. I can’t believe Tucker didn’t know this guy’s background and this other stuff. I think I’m totally done with social media and going back to my Bible.
I’m right there with you. I’ll stick with Sundance and my Bible. (Not in that order, sorry Sundance)
I always thought Tucker was naive. His laugh always bugged me. However his naivete seems to bring out something that was needed at the time. He is giving this guy the space to hang himself? Not sure if he’s that smart. Tate talks to fast and too quickly like a very real narcissist.
Other than the common sense, perfectly rational views put forth by Tate, what do you claim he’s done that negates his positions?
I have to agree. I follow politics, but who is this Tate guy, and what has he done to merit trashing Carlson? A paragraph summarizing the crime would be helpful to the audience.
Any of these comments, including “Sundance”, that try to get you to NOT WATCH this video, has an agenda. WATCH LISTEN AND MAKE UP YOUR OWN MIND!
Then why is the video there in the article for anyone to see and hear? Just one click away?
Boy this sure opened a hornets nest of controversy.
Sometimes an interview is nothing more than an interview and has no relation to The Matrix (Tate) that so many are reading into this. Is it necessary to psychoanalyze the motives of interviewers like Johnny Carson, Bill Buckley, Peter Robinson, Tucker, and others?
While Tucker commands a strong following today will his work be as timeless, or important, as Buckley’s? No. Carlson is good in our time only because our choices are limited
I found Buckley utterly repulsive, in love with his own ego.
But to each his own. I miss Sam Francis and Joe Sobran, and the wonderful and curmudgeonly Pat Cadell … Boy, do I miss him!
There are precious few voices for us in the public eye these days. They aren’t God, or even angels.
But as Lincoln said of Grant, “I cannot spare this man … He FIGHTS”. They fight, they risk, at their own expense. Let’s not tear down our own house with our own 2 hands.
Tate is a weirdo, ick. But he’s not important. Tucker is.
Quite right…‘to each his own’
The Hitler Diaries made a fortune for Murdoch who knowingly made a journalist mistake to cash in.
Tate is an op, a Hughe Heffner, a porn celeb philosopher.
Tucker knows Tate is gold and wants to cash in. He can say, I was wrong.
Hitler Diaries
I have never always agreed with Tucker. He said nothing on taking on mRNA vax or when Fox stole 2020 in Arizona
It’s a news story guys. Not a news fact
Didn’t watch either video and don’t need to. I’m a good judge of character, and from watching a handful of 30-second clips I already knew Tate was not trustworthy. I don’t begrudge Carlson giving the interview — Tate is influential, whether we like it or not — and I certainly don’t begrudge Carlson using the most influential social media platform to promote his content.
I keep snorting as I read your character attacks against Musk, because you’re basing your judgment on media-driven events and his actions since he acquired Twitter. I’ve been watching his full-length interviews from before people knew what SpaceX was. That’s the baseline I use to compare his words and actions. He’s trustworthy. He doesn’t get everything right, and makes more mistakes than you or I would ever admit to, but he has two characteristics that make him trustworthy: He seeks truth with a maniacal drive, and he despises the corrupt government.
He is the largest direct beneficiary of stolen taxpayer wealth: difficult to despise “the corrupt government” when sucking on Uncle Gov’s
Is he, or is he not, doing something NASA could never do?
Is he, or is he not, delivering a real product with our money.?
Can’t say that for fed/gov.
You are going to be sadly disappointed in your judgement and in Musk.
My last post on this matter…..The first video was a hatchet job made by our enemies. Although they hate Tate for what he represents its Tucker causing them the most headache. Our enemy(s) slyly fed this into the right. The real interview is NOTHING that I would be afraid to show middle schoolers. I watched it at least twice in its entirety.
Please don’t fall for this shit. TC is on a helluva a roll and all of you should find it peculiar. YOU are the PEOPLE that will FEED this to NORMIES….so please don’t. You will ONLY hurt Donald Trump in the end I am certain of it. That is NOT me trying to scare you. That is me telling you the truth. Don’t LET the ENEMY stunt our momentum. Have told you this is the first time I felt like DT could win by completely overwhelming the enemy.
This is a “Grabbem by the pussy” moment. Again, don’t give it any more O2.
Are you saying Sundance provided us with a fraudulent video?
TBF … that was not a “video” … rather a collection of sound bytes with no context whatsoever.
It was a video comprised of film clips. A “sound byte” is just a snippet of sound.
My last post on this matter…..The first video was a hatchet job made by our enemies. Although they hate Tate for what he represents its Tucker causing them the most headache. Our enemy(s) slyly fed this into the right. The real interview is NOTHING that I would be afraid to show middle schoolers. I watched it at least twice in its entirety.
Agreed.
the guy lives in Romania?!? why would you go there?
Beautiful place! “Cold Mountain” was filmed there for example.
News articles say that he is on record stating that he expected Romania would be less likely to charge him with rape on the #MeToo say-so of any woman.
Well with all of this material on Tate that is out in the public … it does show Tucker took a very myopic and tragically incomplete view of Tate. He’s a pimp. Or perhaps the (now legitimized sex worker UNION) would say “promoter” … or “facilitator”
If this is the kind of motivational speaking Tate dishes out to young followers … then Tucker should want no part of it
But … consider also the utter trivializing of sex and pornography in our current decadent culture. It appears as though Caligula is alive and well … and profiting from women who … at the end of the day … get off on displaying their sex all over the internet. If Tate is coercing women … he is no more than lighting a fire under women who will gladly show their ‘goodies’ on the internet for fame, $$, and ‘likes’.
We all need to raise our sons and daughters BETTER than that … and Tucker should know better. I DO expect a full mea culpa from Tucker. Yeah, he had a lapse in judgement
I remember when I learned about Larry Flint. I also remember learning about Hugh Hefner. Both were seedy characters and my knowledge didn’t draw me to either of them. One was more crude than the other but they both taught me that men have to be looked at carefully before allowing them into your mind space.
Porn has been around forever and with drugs and media promotion, the industry is growing exponentially. I can remember when I first learn of girls in college who became paid whores to finance their way to a great education. It’s another world and it ain’t always pretty.
And who’s to say Tate doesn’t have other groomer pimps in his multi level marketing scheme.
a bit off topic but how much do I love the back cushion on those chairs!!!!!!!!
🤣 😂 😅 😂
Funny, I noticed both of their feet. Sockless with shoes that look like girl’s shoes. How disgusting!
Boom!
And the gorilla in the room!
All of you defending this guy seem to think the girls all wanted it and asked for it, right?
I suppose this interview helps to eases your conscience for using all the little girls that were trafficked your way.
If you don’t believe some girls … perhaps MOST girls … involved in the sex trade don’t get off on the: fame, money, and likes … then you haven’t been paying attention to PDJT secret videos … There are many women who know that ALL they have to “trade” is their sexuality.
Do I LIKE that? No. Did I raise my daughter different than that? You bet
From what I understand, Tate did not kidnap any of “the” girls/women. Females need to be held accountable for their choices in life. Tate would not be in business or have a platform if “his” females refused to be used as barter (sex for money).
I imagine there is a neverending supply of pliable women who CHOOSE to use their God-given beauty to defile themselves for the ego, money, and adoration it can generate. I’m reminded of the Proverb that I paraphrase; “A beautiful woman lacking discretion is like a fine gold ring in a pig’s snout”
Creepy
Tate is like a character out of a Patricia Highsmith novel. Anyone agree?
Let’s let Tate be Tate. His lifestyle may not be to everyone’s taste but he’s obviously a self made and intelligent fellow.
I prefer him to 90% of our political class. I have a strong feeling Donald Trump would like Tate.
My 2¢.
I seriously doubt that Trump would actually like Tate. He’d see through him in a NY minute. That’s not to say he wouldn’t treat him politely.
It’s one thing to have integrity as a journalist. I did not expect an interview like this from Tucker. Well, thanks Sundance. You saved me money from signing up for a subscription.
Good point. Of all the many interviews or subjects Tucker could pick, it was Tate. Why?
The thing that may have been missed on the Tate interview. Social media, particularly long form podcasts have been talking about the differences between men and women in great depth. This is a cultural reform subject. Bringing that discussion into the mainstream across broader society instead of just gen Z is a good thing. Whether Tate is guilty or not he presented some good arguments that will make people think. Tucker did right to have that discussion.
I agree, Netgeek. The discussion is needed. Both men AND women need to be held accountable for their choices.
I’ve believed for some time Tate is somehow enmeshed in the Eastern Europe child trafficking ratlines and was likely falsely arrested in Romania which is also a site of biden corruption. My question is WHO influenced Tate’s arrest and detention? Oddly Romania is suddenly coming up in the biden corruption scandal. Are the two connected? I don’t believe in coincidences…
Great point, T_D. Thank you.
When Tucker does in depth interviews on J6 or election fraud let me know.
Until then, he is just a farce, shocked! Shocked! that there is gambling going on.
In the words of Shakespeare…”Much ado about nothing.” The country is falling apart, society is has lost its bearings, Great Britain and France are slowly be swallowed up by Islam. The orks are at the door and this thread is analyzing Tucker Carlson and Andrew Tate? The only thing worse that this whole thread is the fact that I am wasting my time commenting on it.
All of what you mention, mptc, are pieces of the corrupt NWO puzzle. Sundance is helping us piece it together. We gain insight every time Sundance shares his knowledge, introspections, and hunches with us. We are fortunate to have Sundance on our side.
I don’t know Sundance…getting kind of funky in your analysis and subject choices. Tucker, Twitter, Elon – Bannon and Harmeet. Each are forces for Trump, and not opposed necessarily to RFK Jr. Suspicious Cat…
This is a stupid question but it bothers me … why aren’t Tucker and Andrew wearing socks?
I have never heard of Andrew Tate or his situation. The more I listen to Andrew, the more uneasy he makes me.
OTOH, Andrew claims Romania is a beautiful conservative place and then he claims to be a victim of liberalism.
I noticed he mentioned that he reads the Quran … Muslims are notorious for the “lover boy” manipulation.
Frankly if I was Tucker, I would not have flown there for an interview with this guy.
Not wearing sock has been pushed in fashion magazines since the ‘90s.
Some people believe it’s very fashionable to wear a suit, no socks.
But they are misguided. It’s disgusting.
1. Leather + feet makes you stink.
2. If you don’t take care of your feet, you don’t take care of other parts of your body.
3. It just looks NASTY.
With that said, Tate was very well rehearsed and very well spoken. I agreed with most of what he said. But, I take pause in with his micro facial expressions.
When someone is that well rehearsed and that poised, yet some of the facial micro expressions don’t match in between Tucker’s questions, it signals deception and makes me feel uncomfortable.
Tate believes the things he’s saying, but there is a lot more that he’s holding back and it feels unnatural, almost sociopathic. And that’s what I believe some of the CTH readers are picking up on.
I will state it again. I do like what most of what Tate is saying in the video. The deception comes when he’s talking about his court case and when he gets personal. There is a lot of pain and anguish there.
With that said, it doesn’t help that he has a massive cranium, which is almost cro-magnon in appearance. The side ridges at the top of his eyebrows look like devil horns curling to the top center of his head.
Klingon?
Thank you. I guess I am not a fashionista. I don’t like not wearing socks with shoes/\.
I didn’t like or believe Tate. H’e slick, too cocky and I think his rehearsed answers are lies.
It is disgusting, imo, and the only men I ever knew who habitually walked around with dress shoes (or loafers) and no socks were creepy guys like Tate and creepy in the same way. In another era, he’d be wearing a polyester shirt, open at the neck, with a big flashy gold chain. “Micro facial expressions,” yes! Caught that, too. He’ll look at the camera with a minuscule smirk when he realizes he’s dishing out B.S. that he doesn’t in any way actually believe. He’s saying what he thinks Tucker and his audience want to hear. He hits all the points, doesn’t he? Did he miss any? Bang, bang, bang. As if off a list. Why in the world would Tucker give such an in-depth interview to this particular guy about these topics as if he were running for the presidency instead of facing human trafficking charges? I’m perplexed.
In light of the first video, in the second he actually says that weak men beat women. I guess that makes him …
If you are going to fight for good you can’t do it unless you recognize evil. Carlson slipped badly here.
Maybe it is another Information Warfare (IW) device: Mixing questionable or negative elements with something to cast aspersions.
In this case: Illuminating some of the negative extremes of male-dominated social structures, in order to reinforce negative distortions of masculinity and the God-created complementary male-female design.
Why reinforce such negative perceptions of men and masculinity? Who would want to broadcast such manipulation in mass media, for what reasons? The answers may be found in the likely end state that these and other such things are driving toward. (Who benefits from that weakened societal end state? Hint: Only the US Bloc is being driven toward this weakened end state, not briCs+.)
Tucker is suspect, this is not an isolated example of his apparent agency in potential IW ploys.
I read through this yesterday. While Tate may be a despicable human by almost any standard, Tucker had a right to interview him. I, for one was educated about this man that I had never paid any attention before.
There have been many horrible people throughout the ages that have caused great harm to others. Once they are known, many have gone into hiding or committed suicide. I don’t know where this Tate guy will end up but I learned that he won’t care what I want for him.
I also learned that when my grandson asks about him, I will be prepared with my response. Kids have a funny way of finding about the filth in the world.
As for Sundance, he is still the best on the web for knowledge and common sense. I still believe that Tucker is one of the great ones too. I get the message that Sundance is not a fan of this Tate guy and that’s OK. He is entitled to his opinion and readers need to realize that Sundance is a human with thoughts and feelings.
Tucker may have broken a barrier that others would rather he not touch, but time will tell. I think sunlight is good for helping us understand and know the horror as well as truth.
The computer has a button that can be selected if Sundance or Tucker offends you, but be careful who you read and listen to. Our human tendency is to want to escape from the horrors of people like Tate.
Tucker and Sundance are assets that we conservatives don’t need to throw out with the dish water. Just my humble opinion.
Andrew Brietbart was one of the the greatest assets we had along with Rush Limbaugh. Their thoughts and messages opened eyes and when we lose “true patriots” we will be done. I miss both of them to this day.
I don’t think anybody is saying he doesn’t have a right to interview him. My problem with it is that it’s boring as hell; the guy is obviously full of it (and himself); the guy’s trying to distract from what he’s accused of by pretending to be persecuted for his thoughts and speech (seriously doubt that); and that Tucker seems to have bought it. It’s Tucker’s judgement (yes, there can be an e in the word) that’s in doubt now and we’re left to wonder why he seems to be courting this guy (and his fans?).
Interviewing is not courting. It only seems that way since fawning interviews are all you see anymore.
Tucker rightly brought up Tate’s legal troubles and allowed him to give his side. Anyone with half a brain (given his defense) realizes that Tate is immoral, but likely not criminal. Tucker interview is timely, newsworthy and not at all fawning.
It’s called journalism. You just don’t recognize it, given MSM.
Sundance clarifies the video reference. Thanks. I appreciate what you are saying now….
The discussion taking place on this thread proves SD point. The people who have only watched the 2.5 hr video are completely lost on why some commentators strongly dislike AT and what he represents. They are unprepared to take part of the discussion that is going on.
So, not having the time to review all 989 comments, my thought is, why did he take the position for essentially destroying his credibility? No, I didn’t watch the video, so critique me for this if you want, I care nothing for his career, especially since he ruined his credibility with no outside help, which is what Sundance outlined.
Tucker, like Trump, has a talent for generating media copy. IMO, that is what this is all about. The question is, Why did he choose this vehicle? Judgement and wisdom are separate qualities.
Many people here have missed the entire point of the interview. They are unable to get past their intense dislike for the main character in the plot that they completely miss the moral of the whole story. This group is also known as Cancel Culture, where they want to silence anybody that their emotions tell them to hate.
I’m also willing to bet that many of these same people have quoted (Voltaire?) on several occasions: “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”
The question here never was whether you like or hate the main character. That question was never asked. But many people here have made that their only crusade, and anybody who doesn’t agree with them implicitly is just a child trafficker enabler. Shame on you.
The only question on the table is, does even the most vile of society deserve to get a fair trial?
Because, you know, in a “FAIR trial,” you actually will have to sit and listen to what the “vile creature” has to say….
Tucker likes how Tate is telling boys to be men and no women. It’s as simple as that folks.
Okay, I have watched the video clips of the “first video” and I am going to have to change my stance disagreeing with SD. I originally watched the 2 1/2 hour interview and it was great, but obviously this guy is full of crap and Tucker was played or there’s really something wrong with Tucker. I am sorry for defending this guy in the least, however his message in a 2 1/2 hour interview still has some very strong points that we all could benefit from.
Unfortunately we live in the sewer and we have to discriminately pick out the small bits of good we can out of the sewer. I agree, Tucker ought to make a public apology for highlighting this guy without obviously doing his research. Sorry, SD, you did do your research and this dude is a piece of trash that is trying to reinvent himself. He’s probably got some goods on the Bidens and all the other elites and that’s why they’re probably trying to put him in prison for the rest of his life. I’m sure there’s more to the story!
Tucker has shown his gullibility and ignorance in the past which has hurt his credibility. He now claims he has never been politicial and uses that as his excuse.
Anytime I hear anyone talking about this guy, I have to just roll my eyes. I’m so tired of the controversy. Let the courts figure this stuff out.
The second video is like Chinese water torture. Have you ever been at a Thanksgiving dinner with a blowhard uncle who never stops? Suffice it to say this guy’s ego is beyond YUGE. I very seriously doubt that he’s being persecuted because of what he says and (claims he) believes.
Soooo.. this is going to seem like a strange thing to say… but I know of many wealthy men who have married women whom they thought truly loved them.. Makes ya wonder who is the master of the lover-boy method?
The other thing I would like to point out.. is that modeling agencies aren’t that much different.. in respect to their business models… and enticing young women… I used to be a professional model based in NYC.. and witnessed the abuse of the industry firsthand.. They lead you to believe you will be the next supermodel.. Some girls would do anything to become the next supermodel… or be discovered … and actually do… Business format isn’t that much different really.. I could tell you stories that make the Tate interview look mild.. Bottom line is that some women pimped themselves out… while others did not.. A big part of the decision-making process for these girls really came down to a good upbringing.. . or at least that was my observation..
Should Tucker have used better judgment to do the interview? That would be a resounding YES! Maybe the good news is that the Tucker interview will create more awareness with people about these types of business models and opportunists.. Oldest profession on earth… Please don’t attack me.. just wanted to offer an alternative perspective…
I made it through 1:07 and simply couldn’t take another second of watching that revolting man. If Tucker has hitched his wagon to that degenerate then he deserves whatever backlash he gets.
ps. I guess not wearing socks is the new “in” thing.
OMG. I’m still listening and I wish I weren’t but unfortunately I said I’d finish this. You stopped before he got to his attitude towards women. About 1 hr. 15 mins. in, he starts talking about men who have to “compete” for cars, houses, money, “girls.” So “girls” are just another possession, like cars. Then he talks about the “sexual marketplace” and how it’s so hard for the ordinary guy (beta male) to find a woman to have sex with because the market is now “global.” The women can now be flown all over the world, like Dubai, and a guy has to compete with the whole world of men! It’s harder because so many wealthy men can “buy her.” He seriously did say, as if women are a commodity on the “marketplace,” that men buy the women. The best ones, that is. Then he says that “most women” would be happy to “share” a wealthy man and so that leaves that many other men without partners, because (supposedly) a rich guy might have 30 women. (As if more than half the human population isn’t female!) Then he talks about how all the holy books frown upon female promiscuity but not male promiscuity. Just buzzes right over that double standard. Bloviating on about how the promiscuous women makes herself incapable of ever bonding with a husband. No mention of how a promiscuous man somehow is able to bond with a wife. That attitude alone is enough for me to know who he is. If he has a wife, I do feel sorry for her.
I watched this because I had heard of Tate but never really researched what this was all about. So when I saw CTH was covering this I came in for the truth. It’s still murky for me. My only takeaway is the legal aspect of girls giving consent to a cyber pimp. No sex taking place. Tate is a swift talker and obviously dominates Tucker in this interview.
I have not researched Tate but see a lot of people jumping in with their comments and opinions that are negative. IMO good interview and Tate has a lot of good points. Has this world gotten so rotten that it jumps all over a man who expresses what is true for him? IMO he is correct, this is what he sees and knows to be true .
I had not listened to the first video until now …completely different person!
OMG. Please make it stop. 2 hours in now.
Somebody around here has a serious problem with letting the perfect be the enemy of the good. Not everybody can be as unsullied by human foibles. Jumping in with the “I told you so” to tear down anyone who fails to meet your standards is counterproductive, not to say a bit uncharitable. Hold tightly to Diogenes’s candle. You’re going to be waiting for an eternity for the one who will meet those standards.
I don’t carry water for anybody, but I do not attack everyone who disappoints me (or I would not be in the Trump-Or-Bust camp this time around, incidentally). Stopping the imminent destruction of the USA should be our business. Look for allies–especially ones with massive platforms like Carlson and Bannon–who move the ball down the field. In the end, Andrew Tate is a sideshow and not a fulcrum upon which I would ever balance my opinion of Carlson.
Okay; further down the thread, I spoke out about females needing to be held responsible for their decisions, their actions. I didn’t address males. It appears to me that TPTB are also trying to emotionally (if/when not physically) castrate males. This entire “EXPERIMENT” with the sexes by the NWO, TPTB is just grotesque.
We need to stop it. Boys need to allowed to be boys and girls need to be allowed to be girls. Where are the parents of these girls and boys???
Little/young girls at times, want to climb trees and build treehouses like the boys do. Little/young boys notice how the girls are praised for their “femininity” and at times wish they could be like “pampered” girls.
This did not exist when I was a child (born in 1951) and is simply a construct of the NWO to infiltrate the family values and destroy it. WE CAN NOT LET THEM DESTROY OUR FAMILY VALUES.
Let people talk. Evaluate based on your experience. Allow for different experiences. Implement suggestions based on the best info available. Only fools believe that every spoken word is God’s truth.
Awesome interview. Tucker is killing it. Even if you didn’t like, can you not appreciate the lost art of finding out why someone is popular? What is their own thoughts and not the opinionated view you read about?
Seriously motivated me to take stock of if I am doing all I can be to my best self, live my best life, be the man my wife and children need me to be. Did not expect that at all and as much as I can’t stand / have time and patience for long form interviews… but I got up the couch and started walking on the treadmill halfway through.
But I recognize there is no better way to get primary source of one’s message or view out. So watched at 1.5x speed and got the firsthand account. Not the distilled edited secondary source of someone’s biased viewpoint.
If many of you tossing stones truly watched the full 2.5hr interview and still are making all this noise, I ask you to tell what you about the message you disagreed with?
Not the 10yr old clips of out context who knows what bravado and marketing stichks that a very biased and dishonest organizations put together…. the current from 2 weeks ago interview of an individual with much life experience and now mature worldview.
For example even in the mashup slander video’s own clip (4:50), he mentions rejecting the pimp definition with his own of Positive Intellectual Motivated Person. Be a “pimp” of course I’m a “pimp”!
This is self help, multi level marketing stuff… not sex trafficking and we should all see how easily it is to make slander from such (very fine people hoax anyone?)
As he states in Tucker interview, he rather young men reject mindset of depression and be their best and change what is the cause of why they are then succomb to effects of it. I get it… be a modified acroynm of “PIMPs” will appeal more to todays youth. Be competitive. Make virtous women want you by instilling traditional traits such as financial stable, physical capable and mental sharp.
Bit disappointing so many here (including Sundance) are taking the logical fallacy ad-hominem approach to throw out the good with the bad so quickly. My opinion is the message tucker and tate discussed should be elevated and celebrated.
No mis/mal/dis information, just input for you to use your own ability to parse and dissect to live your best life.
You beautifully summarized interview Jimmy. I couldn’t agree more with virtually every word.
I can’t help being skeptical Sundance would really disagree. That doesn’t ring right to me.
Thanks R Green… I seldom comment but had watched the interview before this post.
Figured be a piece here on it soon as Tucker is usually (especially recently) comment or article worthy … was expecting an entirely different take so am equally perplexed.
But we all have our own opinions, judgements and life experiences. None are immune to bias or prejudice… and often with good reason.
Heck I think that is why we struggle so much in our realm of conservative/libertarian/freedom/individualism… we aren’t uniform, think critically, embrace life experiences/growth and challenge our own.
Just reinforces need to have fortitude to think for ourselves.
Sometimes I worry we are our own worst enemies in having purity tests. Our enemies have a common goal of destruction of values and the individual.
By our very nature we will oppose our friends, family and peers that we are 90% of time in agreement with at times… which if not handled or processed objectively can be exploited to further and align with the goals of collectivists.
Surely there are subjects that any of us, for whatever reason, will just not agree on… great! Let’s embrace that vision of our former republic