If you did not watch the two-hour+ video of Tucker Carlson and Andrew Tate [Rumble Link Here], you might not have the correct perspective for just how devastating this video is for the career of Tucker Carlson.
However, that said, this video is very useful in explaining something about Tucker Carlson that has been discussed, debated and argued on these pages for quite a while. First, watch the video. [6 minutes] WATCH:
https://youtu.be/tHAmpUyfyy4
.
Tucker flew all the way to Romania to interview Andrew Tate and present him as the victim of a horrible prosecution. Tucker went out on a limb to portray Tate as wrongly accused. When your entire brand is based on judgement and opinion, you cannot be as wrong as Tucker Carlson was in that portrayal of Tate. You just can’t.
Here’s the bigger issue….
This video shows something very important. Tucker Carlson is above average intelligence, above average communication skills, above average vocabulary, but Carlson also has ordinary and average judgement.
When your brand is established only on your judgement, and insightful opinion based on that judgement – and make no mistake the entire Carlson brand is completely organized around those two characteristics, you cannot afford to be this wrong.
With the evidence of that lacking judgement so clear, it then serves as a very specific and clear data point to reconciling other issues, like Tucker Carlson using the Twitter platform to showcase his Tucker Carlson Tonight broadcasts.
Readers here have long known my opinion of Twitter, and that analysis has equally applied to the current disposition of Elon Musk. Twitter CEO Elon Musk is teetering on the precipice of financial ruin as a result of the extremely unstable financial position of the social media enterprise. Twitter is a bottomless pit of costs, with almost no possibility of financial recovery without some major change in the business model.
The financial position of Twitter is the only prism that matters in the review of decisions that Elon Must is making about the platform. Free speech, liberty, safe opinion, the public square, all of it is less than the financial viability of the company. Every large or seemingly consequential decision on the platform is centered around the finances therein. Despite what might be the front face or intent of Mr Elon Musk, nothing else is more important, influential or determinative of his action.
Carlson’s lack of judgement in the Andrew Tate interview, extends toward and explains his relationship with Twitter and Musk; it’s just bad judgement.
Keep this reference point in mind as you weight the opinion and analysis provided by Tucker Carlson.
.
They are both under house arrest. So to speak. Twitter is a holding own for Murdoch
I believe I watched 20-30 seconds of one of Tate’s videos once and turned it off rather quickly because it was immediately obvious to me that he’s an a-hole. I have no idea whether he’s guilty of whatever he’s charged with, or whether there’s political persecution involved. It is clear, however, that Tucker’s a-hole radar isn’t working.
I guess I am getting old. I don’t even know who the hell this Andrew Tate character is. All I see is a vain human being masterbating in front of the ladies who are impressed with his beauty and faux high mindedness. And that was my first impression of this typical clown act. It doesn’t surprise me that this yo-yo impresses young men. He pretends he is the alpha male they all wished they were, at least at some point. Obviously my bias against the popular culture is apparent, but there it is.
Tucker Carlson is a journalist media personality and would always be willing to interview anyone who has world class numbers of pings in the electronic media social world. What strikes me is how little homework Tucker did before he followed his financial instincts to make a buck by giving this obvious piece of crap more air time. I am sure Tucker knows he has been had by a big posturing, small minded hero from Otherworld. I am sure Tucker will take the hit and deal with the fallout by informing himself better before his next big interview. That has always been his style. Who never makes mistakes when they see dollar signs? Next subject.
I don’t know yet… There are countless posts and claims online of what Tate has done. Same for Trump.. same for MAGA.. Same for the left and the Biden admin. Until he goes to court and we get to see the evidence, I will withhold my judgement…
As far as his message during the interview. It was mostly a positive message to work out, take care of yourself be positive and to be involved and engaged in the world around you. I can see how this would piss off most of the fat, lazy MSM watching (yes that includes faux/snoozmax) folk I deal with on a regular bases these days. I understand Sundance’s call for reservation and lack of trust which is always a good idea until the facts come out. However I didn’t expect to see so much distain in the comments for the underlying message. For a group that claims you are innocent before proven guilty I see a lot of people who live in glass houses throwing stones..
It explains a lot about why we are stuck with the corrupt world around us. When you realize that most of the fat, lazy snoozmax crowd is slaved to their pension and/or SS it’s obvious why they never rock the boat. Even worse when they attack people who may jeopardize those comforts. I don’t like or dislike Tate anymore than anyone else. but as I said… I will withhold my judgement until I get the facts.
If this guy is opposed to corruption, maybe I should think about what that phrase means to a lot of people.
There’s an article today in the daily mail uk newspaper about Tucker, his alcoholism ( and subsequent recovery ) and his lengthy friendship with Hunter and Kathleen Biden. The article is about a biography that’s being released on Ticker on August 1st.
It definitely connects a lot of dots after you realize Tucker is a recovering alcoholic and that his judgement was so bad that they considered Hunter Biden a close friend. So close, Tucker was writing letters of recommendation for Hunters children. He also ran interference for Hunter at Fox News. Burning negative stories.
It’s pretty clear that Tucker knew about Hunters issues and it’s also pretty clear that Tucker was in pretty tight with the Bidens.
All I’m saying is, this isn’t surprising. Alcoholics, active and recovered , are notorious for having poor boundaries, bad judgement and toxic friendships. they tolerate horrible behavior from others for much, much longer than they should. They make excuses for the bad behaviors and even enable it.
Ticker has been red pilled, a bit. He’s been freed from TPTB shackles. Which is good. He’s had a lot of success. He will continue to have success. But he’s going to make bad judgement calls. As we’ve seen here.
This disgusting misogynist, Andrew Tate should not EVER be protected. What he did may be legal and they may be stretching their case against him but he’s immoral, unethical and abusive. Yes, stupid women go along with it for whatever reason. But it doesn’t make it right. He’s scum.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12312213/Tucker-Carlson-talks-alcoholic-friendship-Hunter-Biden-new-biography.html
Be aware that the Daily Mail will print just about anything about anyone, as long as the responsibility lies elsewhere. This is how all of the scandal rags operate. That is not to say they are worse than what the MSM does all day every day on the TV medium.
Already confirmed in early June, Controlled opposition is obvious after his return on Twitter. Take it or leave it. Easy pass for me. Trump Won The Election….Say It Tucker.
People need a hero and because of that Tucker can do no wrong.
What did the twitter blurb say? True that, the Red Carpet Conservatives def can’t or don’t want to see it. Or are just part of it.
This is for all the marbles and its mainly what he didnt say upon leaving his bunker starting with the official announcement of the DeSanctus Uniparty campaign.
Similar to what DeSanctus did during the illegal Mar a Lago assault. Lay low and deflect.
The anti-Tucker comments and this article, are all mistaken. That said, I did not watch the video because the subject does not interest me. But neither do I watch Tucker when he talks about UFO’s, which he does often. This AT fellow is a newsmaker, perhaps for all the wrong reasons, but interviewing him is indeed newsworthy. To say otherwise is nonsense.
Lol – you state the comments and article are “all mistaken” without watching the video. Nice.
I have heard people say Sundance has been wrong before, but never an exact example. I have not seen him/her be wrong – even though I very much want it. Durham for example.
Even Sundance will occasionally take credit for knowing things before everyone else. Since that cannot be true unless he is saying things that only come from his own mind, sometimes there is an over reach there. Just as I was not the first person to put the evidence together that Obama is a Muslim Marxist, sometimes we feel like we are alone with our ideas. The question may be, Do we ever have ideas that are not informed at least partially by external information? Sundance makes a living off of noticing external information and remembering even the details of it. He has a great mind for remembering and adding evidence to arrive at his adjustments to his facts. Only an idiot can’t see that he has a great gift.
Mozart, the odd time, didn’t hit the correct tones in his music. But he was right often enough to make his name as the world’s greatest composer. I never knew why I should buy in to such claims, even though I have always been pretty much tone deaf. So, instead of assuming Sundance is right, we should sometimes look for reasons why he might not be. He will know when he needs to make adjustments to his factual perceptions and when to clarify something.
This is what makes Sundance and Tucker Carlson both people who can almost always be trusted to make only honest mistakes. I prefer Sundance’s logical methods, but there is a place for Tucker’s ability to reach masses of people with messages he can logically derive from his own knowledge base.
erm… “I didn’t bother to familiarize myself with the facts because I know they’re wrong”?
“…but Carlson also has ordinary and average judgement.” Says someone whose essays are so verbose that they can be used instead of
melatonin to put one to sleep..
Tate repelled me immediately and I hadn’t even heard of him before. I could only listen to Tucker for a few minutes. First time.
Who is Andrew Tate? What did he do wrong? Why is he in Romania? What makes him so famous?
I cut the cord a long, long, long time ago. I do not follow pop culture so I am missing a lot of the back story.
Watch the video and Andrew Tate will tell you who he is.
His rendition of himself may not be the COMPLETE STORY. When I tell people “who I am” I leave out a lot of details.
An internet search yields the results that are either “AT is a saint” or “AT is a demon”.
No one will spell out in words that are as dry and neutral as a medical journal what he did, what he failed to do, who he is accused of harming, slandering, or whatever, a timeline, where and how he became “well known”, what caused him to go to Romania, is he an American citizen, WHY do some people adore him, and WHY do some people despise him.
Right now, all I see is “He is so great” and “He is so horrible” articles about him that assume that the reader know THE BACKSTORY.
After what you hear about Andrew Tate, out of Andrew Tate’s own mouth, is a lot of back story necessary? Would it matter if he volunteered at nursing homes? Would it matter if he endowed a Christian college or picked up trash in the park?
the crux of the matter.
B I N G O
Yeah, and Hitler liked dogs and babies.
Anyone with a modicum of intelligence and decency can tell that this Tate guy is a foul, demented loser.
And FWIW, the same goes for Tucker Carlson.
I’m like you; I did google his name and decided I was not interested in him.
Google??? Ha, ha, ha. A trustworthy site – not.
Everything’s a conspiracy, isn’t it? LOL
He, and his brother, are American citizens, he is a convert to Islam and has been making a living off of teaching young men how to be men – i.e. lord of the women in their life, old school orthodox (whether Christian, Muslim or Jewish) that the woman must obey the man, which is quite a popular thing these days after so many years of young men being told they are worthless.
He made the mistake of tweeting to Greta Thunberg and that was all it took to get the powers that be to find a way to shut him up and so within days of his tweet women have come forward to accuse him of trafficking them.
Thank you. I am curious as to why you are somewhat supportive of AT as is Tucker while Sundance and many other posters are against him.
Ok, I thought the first video was just the replay. I’ve watched it and am surprised by Tucker’s lack of research on this. Hopefully he’ll fix this. If not, hmmm.
This is a classic example of me needing to continue being vigilant. I’m SO distrustful of 3 letter agencies that my use of that heuristic was a poor choice.
What does he fix? The fact that someone is facing jailtime for a non-crime? You may not like AT but Tucker is surely exposing the hypocrisy in the conservative movement. Despite the fact that AT is despicable, he has the right to his opinion and since he is so “famous”, he is newsworthy. Tucker is merely pointing out that “othering” is wrong, cancelling is wrong, bring ridiculous charges against someone based on his opinions is wrong.
Apply the same metric if he was interviewing President Trump. Someone successfully sued of sexual assault a “liar” (according to MSM), a racist, misogynist, an insurrectionist, etc. Should Tucker avoid him?
Agree. Greta is not to be touched, she is connected. They can now hang anything on anyone. Clapper bragged about putting stuff on computers, now there are deep fakes, and plenty of people who can be paid or blackmailed to accuse anyone of anything. I don’t follow Tate, but I’m not a fan of Islam, so I disagree with that extreme of a subjugation of women.
Not supportive, simply observant.
Troll.
Because insecure men try to self-medicate their fragile ego by feeling powerful over girls.
Rather pathetic, isn’t it?
Carlson is the target of the article. Tate whose name was the most searched name in 2022, according to Google. Tate and Carlson are making the case that Tate is being silenced, likely with the support of the US Government. IMO> The Cam porn is crap, a red herring distraction to discredit Tate.
Maybe Bessie can think for herself
The thing I love most about this site (aside from analysis by host) is SD/CTH don’t require us to agree and field is left open for discussion. Maybe I’m wrong but I didn’t read into anything SD wrote as being “against” anyone. SD said Tucker showed ‘lack of judgement’. There’s a distinction.
You think Andrew Tate is lying about himself to make himself look bad? Women have been making accusations against Andrew Tate since at least 2015.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Tate#Criminal_investigations
Using wikipedia is weak sause
You have a link to something that shows this particular Wikipedia entry is incorrect?
Somehow my comment has been misunderstood.
I have no affinity to Mr. Tate, or his brother, they will get what is coming to them. Simply making the observation that the powers that be never once bothered to shut him and his brother’s pimping down until he made a viral comment to Greta Thunberg that, because of his followers all began agreeing with him, making her a laughing stock, which immediately brought the worlds attention onto her lies that the eye of Sauron decided it was finally time to take them down.
It’s nice to know and be aware who are the protected (Ms. “How dare you”) and how quickly those that think they are protected (the Tate’s) can instantly be brought down. We can learn how the deep state moves to block any damage to their narratives.
The most protected AUTISTIC LITTLE BRAT the world has ever known!!!🥴
Exactly.
Part of the Age of Great Pretending.
Discernment is your friend.
Don’t worry Bessie. I got you above. No self defense necessary
The woman in the 6 minute video is one of the two women making accusations from 2015. That was in the UK and the authorities in the UK dropped the case from lack of evidence.
Tate’s Twitter account, a lot of info is dribbling out. Apparently, the woman was holding a knife and he slapped her. The tape was edited, and we see it, but he has an original copy. He’s making his case re many issues on his Twitter account.
It’s a great interview. My first time listening to a 2.5 hr interview. Highly captivating.
Wow. This is such a peculiar presentation of Tate. I just tilt my head and purse my eyebrows at this.
As soon as I heard him say he spent his time reading the Koran, I knew him and his philosophy. Good luck to him and those who think like him with putting that particular genie back in the bottle. Real women won’t stand for it.
He admits to being a pimp on a large scale and physically abusing the women
Data? He certainly denies that multiple times in the video.
See, Snellville Bob says that AT is a pimp and abuses women while you say that he denies it. So what is the truth?
Bob provides no links to proof. You, at least, say watch the video.
After watching how people who get on the wrong side of the groups who control the planet (eg, PDJT) but are slandered and libeled and also how other people who really are deviants (eg, Weinstein, Epstein, human traffickers) but manage to commit their evil for decades without punishment have convinced me to Sit This One Out.
Perhaps, if Sundance want to write an article with his evidence of who AT is, what he has done, who AT works for, and why he is being punished now then that would be great.
But I am mostly getting one sentence responses with no real evidence either way.
Maybe you aren’t willing or able to do your own research? Maybe you think other people are responsible for figuring out what you should think? That’s kind of a progressive democrat world view.
Or maybe you just want to keep the focus of the conversation on “proof” of who this person is so you can stop people from talking about Tucker.
Even if this guy were prosecuted and found not guilty of some law or another, the words coming out of his mouth show he is morally repugnant and they cause reasonable people to conclude Tucker has poor judgment.
Why are you working so hard to ignore that? My guess you’re trying to take the spotlight off Tucker.
What did he say that was so “morally repugnant?”
Watch the first video.
I did watch it. What he says is controversial and arrogant. “Morally repugnant?” That’s your own subjective feel-feelz.
Not a fan of the guy’s delivery, but he tells the truth. Does he deserve to be imprisoned for that? For being “morally repugnant” to YOU?
You must be an insulting bully like Andrew Tate. That you resort to insulting bullying tactics lets me know that some of his supporters are just like him. Thanks. Now, I’m on the side of Sundance.
Go away. I have already told you that doing an internet search yields results that say he is a monster and others that say he is a saint.
Who should I believe?? Show me provable FACTS without the personal opinion and then I may be inclined to think one way or another.
If I wanted to do research on Donald J Trump and did an internet search then MOST OF THE RESULTS WOULD COME UP AS BEING WHAT A HORRIBLE PERSON TRUMP IS. So I know there is a bias against Trump and a throttling of the TRUTH.
So, I must assume that those who control access to information are going to do the same to AT.
Two people that I trust for information, Sundance and Tucker, disagree about him. An internet search is going to yield results that are full of opinion and attempts to sway me.
Go away. Stop insulting me.
My point was to encourage you to think for yourself. My point was not to insult you but to empower you. I raised the question of whether you were trying to take the spotlight off Tucker because that seemed to be a reason not to decide (keep the conversation going about maybe this maybe that).
After this, I will as you say “leave you alone,” but I want you to know my intent was not to insult you.
It’s great to take in information, which we all do, but then we need to use that information. I’m glad you said you’ve decided you are now “on the side of Sundance” (I assume you mean you agree Tucker had poor judgment). One, I’m glad you see Sundance’s point, but more than that, I’m glad you decided for yourself.
Well said!
Did you even watch the first video, where he proudly declares “I AM A SCUMBAG.”???
Everything he denies in the second vid, he admits to in the first; and yet you and a few others ask for proof? It’s right there under our noses, and if it’s putrid odor doesn’t make you sick, I don’t know what would.
There’s TWO videos. WHICH video are you referring to?
This is a lie. The people attacking Tate here are acting like democrats.
I believe we saw video, too, unless that was a deep fake. These days, who knows? If he beat that girl and especially for the reason he put forth to her, then I believe he’s going to have a time supplying reasonable doubt; but then I have no clue what sort of justice system the Romanians have.
Frankly, why reconnect the cord? Like you, I watch practically no poop culture, least of the infotainment stuff which is political chewing gum for the eyes.
What the fate of Carlson’s ‘brand’ has to do with the serious business of a torpedoed republic is beyond me. Television will expropriate your mother if you give it half the chance.
I didn’t know either, but the short video reveals him to be a pimp. A predator who manipulates, sexually exploits, and victimizes vulnerable young women. A scumbag, lowlife POS.
Is there any reason you can’t do on-line research for yourself instead of asking/needing to be spoonfed? If not, Sundance gives you the answer in his first video. Did you even watch it?
The problem with Andrew Tate is that he claims to be championing traditional masculinity but he is not. He reduces women to a sex that is only interested in money/material items. So he bases his entire philosophy on males having to become hyper-successful in the form of hustle culture to generate as much money as possible to enable these successful males to have the right to access as many pure, young and pretty women as they want. And in exchange for the money his women (please note the plural) must obey Tate. In Tate’s world there is no such thing as a virtuous woman who is not interested in material possessions. One shudders to think what type of life he has lead that he has not met women like this.
Tate voices legitimate criticism of the hook up culture especially as that pertains to making women who are extremely, ahem, successful at the hook up culture valueless for marriage and then turns around and says there is zero problem with male promiscuity. Ignoring the fact that this is not true.
He has basically taken feminism and rebranded it for men to behave in the way feminists have championed for women for the last fifty years. In short, he is a massive hypocrite and not pushing the best solution for our current problems (which would be chastity for all outside of marriage).
Having watched, rather forced myself to watch, the first video ad instructed, then reading the reminder of the article, I simply could not watch the second video.
If my memory serves me correctly, I read or heard something to the effect that either Tucker, himself, was a member of the Intelligence Community or his dad was or still is a member of the Intelligence Community. Also; Tucker, in my opinion, simply could not be employed by a so-called Main Stream Media company and Not be a part of The Mockingbird.
Those are the reasons that I will always view Tucker with suspicion.
They fired him.
What better way to get zealous supporters?
This is so absurd. What is wrong with people?
It takes some longer than others.
Tucker: Still drawing a paycheck, and adhering to contract terms (though barely, by appearances).
The guy is a criminal and should be spending time in prison. Human garbage!
Obviously, Carlson is trying to gain more exposer for his show. The same way Rogan went about gaining subscribers for Spotify.
Money makes man do stupid things, interviewing that pos was stupid.
The guy is a criminal and should be spending time in prison. Human garbage!
So sayeth the yellowstream media about DJT so let’s lock him up!
Money makes man do stupid things, interviewing that pos was stupid.
TC is reputedly worth multiple hundreds of millions. Are we to assume money is his sole motivator here?
How about some critical thinking and less emotion?
The F’er is a Pimp criminal. He himself admitted no less. The world once upon a time put women trafficker in prison.
The world is full of men with 100’rds of millions dreaming about billions.
Trump is not a criminal, Tate is!
And where in my comment do you see emotion? Just a statement in facts.
Tate is a criminal, prison.
Carlson is doing what Rogan did!
And when did money not drive man to be stupid, stupid.
OK I’ll play.
The guy is a criminal and should be spending time in prison.
And where in my comment do you see emotion? Just a statement in facts.
Tate is a criminal, prison.
J6 attendees are also in prison so they are guilty. Yes?
Stupid comparison.
Bold statements for someone who has proffered no evidence whatsoever of this man’s “trafficking of women” or Pimping. I was under the impression that people are innocent until convicted as guilty. You state unequivocally “Trump is not a criminal” (which I happen to agree with) but without any statements of fact or evidence and want others to believe that. Interesting that you do not offer the same level of confidence or even scepticism to another human being charged with crimes of such gravity.
I have watched the entire video and while some of this man’s statements may be indeed controversial and against the norms of what some might call “traditional” male/female relationship standards, many of his views are solidly in the camp of providing a perspective of manliness that is consistently being degraded in our culture.
I would challenge both you and Sundance (whom I respect to the core) to actually provide solid views, evidence to the contrary or anything other than hyperbole in the snap judgement of this man.
This forum is for thinkers, researchers and patriots as far as I can tell…..unfounded statements of 100% emotion thrown out into the comments section without facts, backup or anything only result in a show of ignorance. (IMHO)
You are 100% entitled to your opinions, and I will fight for that right for you to have. However, without “Freedom of Speech” there is no Democracy or Republic. Perhaps in the future, you would be so kind as to state the evidence before you “convict” someone. The LEFT cancels people without evidence…..we should not stoop that low.
Peace to you.
Did you watch the first video, where AT says HE is a pimp. First he Fcks the woman, gets her to fall in love with him, then presents to her getting a webcam and doing onlyfans, etc. They key is having a trusted female to present it to her to get her to agree. (Think Epstein/ Ghislane). He says he built his empire by getting women to do this. There is video of him abusing/beating woman on bed and having her look into camera and state why she is being. beaten. THAT is the real Andrew Tate. NOT the apple pie version he sold to Tucker and. Tucker sold to his viewing audience.
Epstein/Ghislane went for underaged girls and then kidnapped them.
People say that’s the same crime this guy is guilty of. I myself don’t know that. BUT….if he is guilty of kidnapping, then charge him with that crime, but they aren’t, which leads me to believe it’s because they don’t actually have any evidence.
Instead, you’re saying it’s perfectly okay to send this guy to prison and charge him with “manipulation” simply because you find him repugnant.
I didn’t say AT is guilty of crimes or anything about him deserving prison. I said Tucker did a terrible job and he’s gonna lose a lotta people’s trust.
I watched Tuckers interview with AT last week. I thought it was a good interview. I liked what AT said. I didn’t know much about him–just that he was controversia, the left hates him and he had some sex/rape related charges. I didn’t research anything. Tuckers video was listening entertainment while I gardened. That 6 minute video shocked me. Tucker’s video didn’t prepare me for that video– Tuckers interview felt like a betrayal. When others see it, I’m sure I won’t be the only one left feeling like I can’t trust Tucker & what he presents on his show.
Tucker could have asked the hard questions about AT past comments and behavior and the viral video. AT could have responded with the defense that many people have given on this thread (and left it up to the audience as to what they believed). Instead Tucker didn’t ask hard questions and kept his audience in the dark. . Most people who listen to Tucker will never make it to TCTH or this thread. Many only watch Fox News. If their liberal friend shows them the 6 min. video, they will be blindsided.
Fair enough. It does sound like AT is taking Islamic treatment and views of women as authentic and proper and deserved treatment for woman, a horror. I’ll listen to the other tape… and send it to my nephews with an explanation re: why these views of AT are destructive to civilization because they are.
If we called him a “groomer” (of women instead of children), would that help make sense of some people’s pov? Women do have agency, or at least they should have. But let’s face it, most women are not physically (or even emotionally) as strong as men, for the most part, and emotional abuse, physical intimidation, and threats of beatings can put the kibosh on any woman’s ability to stand up against a guy who will use force. Maybe it’s similar to the Stockholm Syndrome. He tells us who he is in the first video. Why should we doubt it from his own mouth? Is it criminal to be a jerk? No. But is that the extent of it? The jury over there will decide.
Peter, Awesome response to Loren,
Please stop the garbage of defending the sick sob. He is an abuser of women, that has nothing to do with masculinity. He practices tactics employed by pimps. The guy is two faced, large public exposer ( All I’m doing is fighting for male masculinity and the left) in the private vids and there are more than the one Sundance showed here and more vile ( women are on earth to be used). He is a pig.
Evidence, its all over the internet, not hard to find. And I do not need anyone fighting for my free speech, i have done it my whole life.
Maybe if the guy tried to talk about God and Jesus Christ, instead of how many women he has had sex with and how he got that sex!
Agreed.
I listened to this long interview. AT did make several valid points.
He said other things I thought were bad and very influenced by the Koran he says he reads.
My 20-ish nephews are big fans of AT. This was my 1st time hearing him. I mentioned AT to one nephew and he listens to everything AT says. I said AT made some valid points but is cynical toward women influenced by the fact he’s a Muslim. My nephew denied he was a Muslim.
So I will listen to more of AT and focus on showing that Muslim views of women are basically violent and hedonistic. Women are not slaves to do with as you please. We don’t bully or batter women into submission as IS taught in the Koran.
Again, though, AT … IMO did make valid points re: traditional masculinity that needs to be restored to our young men… but the Christian biblical guide re: make/female relationships should be the guide, not Isman and the Koran.
What’s your proof beyond a reasonable doubt that he’s guilty of a crime, Internet Perry Mason?
A video confession by Andrew Tate doesn’t do it for you, Internet DA Burger? No wonder you lost every case but one in a decade.
Read “Lisa in TN’s” 2:29 pm post right above yours.
Sorry, Law & Order SVU, I didn’t hear him say, “I trafficked women.” Sounds they did whatever they did voluntarily. Try again.
I read Lisa in TN’s comment above and while she’s correct he said those things in first video, video is segmented and I have no idea what full context would show. As far as I know, Tate could have been repeating something he heard someone else say, or how some may depict him or whatever. Without full context, you can’t possibly consider that a confession.
…Unless you work for some U.S. intelligence agency that is.
Why ya gotta be so nasty?
Do you need a hug?
LOL
Someone needs a hug!
It’s getting a little creepy Boogy.
How was Tucker wrong? You never say.
Not necessarily wrong.
Tucker used bad judgment and then got lied to by Tate.
Giving the dirtbag the time of day!
He calls himself a pimp?
Pimping is is not necessarily a bad thing to young people of color, it is though to old white people such as yourself.
You think you got “people of color” all figured out, don’t you!
Nope, just more than you.
So your support sex slavery?
Do you support child porn? Pedophilia?
You are part of the problem.
When was what you stated ever part of the discussion? Off your meds today?
I know nothing about Tate and did not watch this Tucker interview. I am assuming Tate is a psychopath who conned Tucker. Psychopaths are experts at what they do: conning and manipulating. Don’t assume you couldn’t be conned-–anyone, even the smartest person, can be conned by a psychopath. Not all psychopaths and not every time but don’t ever think you are immune to a psychopath’s con.
Tucker’s brand is not ruined, in my opinion.
Read a book by Robert Hare called Without Conscience. He would go into prisons to interview serial killers and psychopaths – all serial killers are psychopaths; not all psychopaths are serial killers. He would take graduate students with him.
He said the psychopaths would manipulate the grad students. The grad students couldn’t resist or protect themselves even though they knew the person was a psychopath. That’s how good they are.
On the street, people don’t stand a chance.
What you say is true EXCEPT the proof is out there on the internet. AT has been publicly promoting his get rich off pimping women. People have been collecting the evidence and posting it for several years on social media. The evidence of who AT really is was there to be found through basic research. Research I would expect someone like Tucker to have done. Tucker IS responsible for what he presents to his viewing audience. Tucker should have done basic research before selling the American pie version Andrew Tate presented.
If I don’t hear exactly how he pimped them out, and how much money he made from it, I’m going to think it’s bullshit.
Just because Tucker allowed the guy to ramble, you think that was Tucker’s way of affirming his behavior?
Tucker lets just about everybody ramble on in his interviews. He did it with Pence, with DeSantis, etc….
I like Tucker’s style. He lets the interviewees make their case, and Tucker just gets out of the way, which is what a journo is supposed to do.
Interviewing is knowing which questions are important to ask, then letting the person answer. We’re always saying to the senate/house investigating committees–and to journalists….ASK THE RIGHT DANG QUESTIONS. Tucker didn’t.
Alleged Behavior*
Two minutes of research watching the videos Sundance posted would have shown Tucker who this guy is.
Too bad you didn’t watch the video. The guy told the world who he is.
The point is that Tucker didn’t need to interview the guy.
But then Ticket wouldn’t have gotten the clicks.
Not ruined, but many of his fans thought he had more perception and common sense. At least he should have done some research on this guy. Maybe on the long flight over there?
He gives himself away because he can’t keep the smirk off his face as he’s lying. In that way, he reminds me of Obama.
I’ve seen the headlines about Tate in past months since his arrest but was never interested enough to read the reports. Today is the first time I I’ve read commentary or seen video of him.
After watching the first video, my impression was “this guys a pig!” and I was unclear if changes against him were warranted or not.
After watching second video, I’m having a hard time finding much I would disagree with Tate about.
How was this interview a mistake by Tucker?
Excellent! So many here are ready to judge something they know nothing about. Sad.
I saw the second video on my own when it aired and had the same impression. I watched the five-minute video here and am now conflicted. I never like the five-minute mash-up video as a medium for judging a person, though his own words are disgusting. I think back to the Trump Access Hollywood video and how if that were the only thing I knew about him, I would have a false impression.
The second video dishes out what this guy says when he’s wearing the hat of wanting to earn money coaching/influencing men. (And when he’s interviewed by mainstream media, which is basically what Tucker is.)
In other words, thus guy is trying to make money whether pimping or coaching/influencing.
What ties the two videos together is that in both the guy is marketing his businesses.
Maybe if the interview had shown both sides of Tate.
We only get the my a– is in trouble side,so of course he wants to look good.
His opinion of women,in the other videos shows him for what he is.
A con….
Now we can make our own free choice on how we see this sort of thing.
It is not godly,that is what I know.
I don’t know why Tucker would do this (second) interview of Tate. After his first one, I got curious and went down a few rabbit holes and saw most of this 6 minute video pieces in longer other videos out there on the internet. This was easily 4-6 months ago. I immediately realized how wrong I had been thinking he was a decent “male” role model. Trust me, that 6 minute “debunked video” is NOT debunked and there is much more out there. Tucker made a major mistake and misjudgement interviewing (again) this person. Is what he did with this webcam stuff legal/illegal? Who knows. All I know is this man has massive issues disrespecting women. The man is a straight up misogynist who speaks about women like objects to be used and abused. The fact that Tucker would sit in the same room as him is horrific to me and changes the way I see him. Full stop.
You must have never heard the lyrics to a rap/hip-hop song. What you call misogyny is the culture of our youth. Young men started disrespecting women when they stopped repecting themselves.
Oh this I know….I was hopeful after seeing Tucker’s first interview that perhaps we had finally found a good male role model who would encourage young men to be masculine. Alas, I found a degenerate who for some reason Tucker wanted to interview…again
It makes me wonder about Carlson’s own attitude about women. I wonder what his wife and daughters would think of AT.
I’ve been reading and I still struggle to understand who Andrew Tate is and why we care.
Apparently he’s a low level kick boxer. It’s not like he’s Connor MacGregor.
What else has he done?
I don’t think this is devastating for Tucker because, again, who?
Maybe I’m just too far removed from popular culture.
They’re normalizing prostitution. Look into OnlyFans. A female law school grad was offered an associate position at a law firm for $75,000 a year. She did OnlyFans instead. She made $75,000 in her first 3 months.
He has a reach of millions of young men all over the world, during a time when TPTB are trying to strip away all of their self-respect and power. He’s showing them that they will always have self-empowerment available to them. His other beliefs, concerning the value of women, are not exactly worthy of respect. Still, he has tought many valuable lessons to young men/kids through his videos.
And Hitler made the trains run on time.
Tucker has always been an opportunist, working ‘both sides of the street’. People putting their hope into Tucker will be disappointed.
Perhaps you could cite a few examples of this.
Tulsi Gabbard? (a frequent guest on the FoxNews run)…?
Harmeet Dhillon (another frequent guest)…?
etc….
Add: The Liberal Sherpa who lately defrauded her mother of thousands of dollars was Tucker’s guest many times. Finally he got rid of her.
Exactly how is having those guests working both sides of the street?
Didn’t Tucker interview Kanye West right before his last meltdown? That wasn’t devastating.
I watched almost all of the full interview a couple days ago with the wife. She was not offended.
I didn’t know much about Tate. Tucker basically allowed him to talk. I found the conversation interesting.
A little research showed that Tate is despised by the politically correct, feminist crowd.
It appears that there are a great deal of criminal charges going around for those who say or tweet rude, mean things according to our betters. Orange Man Bad, don’t you know.
Coming on too strong or too retro should not be a crime.
I am very reluctant in this climate to assume guilt when someone is thrown into court and then jail by the NWO.
Did you watch the first video Sundance posted? Most of your post is what you could come away with watching the Tucker interview…that first video though—exposes the true Tate in his own words and actions. NOT the same man/image presented to Tucker’s audience. Has nothing to do with being politically correct, rude or mean.
I watched only the first video. I saw a manipulator and a sleezebag who coerced women into explicit videos but I did not pick up anything that was actual rape. Are we fighting over crimes or morals?
Hitting someone with a belt isn’t a crime? Threatening someone with bodily harm isn’t a crime?
Who knew!
I must have missed a beating there.
It’s in the FIRST video.
Watch 3:07 – 3:53 and focus on 3:34 and a little after.
Thank you for pointing this out to me.
I think Tucker’s best bet is to make a video statement and apology, if he was no aware of this guy’s behavior behind the scenes.
Not fighting. SD wanted to point out the type of person Tucker chose to fly to Romania to interview. Judgement.
I can certainly see that.
Men can be real bast*rds and women can be real *itches.
Never heard of this guy until today. But I’ve seen his kind before. But we didn’t have the internet back then so they never got “famous”.
I watched the video and didn’t see any actual “crime”, but he certainly is a creep. I couldn’t watch all of it though. And all I would say about Tucker is I wish he hadn’t given this creep any airtime.
I was horrified when he beat that girl and was ordering her around. I had to turn it off so I didn’t see how it ended.
A few years ago I saw that Planned Parenthood had some videos for young girls and boys to watch so they could have “safe” BDSM experiences. So apparently this kind of violent behavior is ok if both people agree to it. (I am not in agreement with any of that garbage.)
Human nature has been flawed since Adam and Eve disobeyed God. Only God can redeem us.
In most jurisdictions (but I don’t know about Romania), the state has an interest in prosecuting crimes even if the victim isn’t complaining and doesn’t want to prosecute. Beating someone is a crime, imo. It’s interesting that he exerts his masculinity against small, cowering women.
with “the wife” sad. Just an ‘object’, is she?
Lots of people phrase that I sometimes say the husband. Talk about blanket judging you read a lot into that.
Did you watch the video I watched?
The object, as you childishly called her, is a former public defender, criminal defense attorney, home-schooler, teacher of literature, latin and logic. She has seen too, too much of real life to be frightened by what a tiktok influencer says to Tucker Carlson.
Be very thankful that you are not able to recite your insult to me in person.
It sounded like you think “the wife” is an object under your control and because she agreed with you all was well.
You sort of prove the point by threatening violence when you were challenged.
Weak sauce. What is there to say to someone who is triggered by a husband stating that he is willing to defend the honor of his wife? Don’t clutch your pearls too tightly or they might fall off the string.
Once again you prove the point.
Too bad you don’t have anything informative to say.
By the way, your wife’s honor isn’t in question. Yours is.
Imagine for a moment that this subject came up over dinner and my wife and I told you in person that we had watched the interview, that she and I were not particularly bothered by the content and that we tend to reserve judgement in criminal cases, especially those that are in the pop media.
We are attorneys.
And rather than simply disagreeing with our opinions of the interview, you and the other poster immediately make disparaging remarks about the nature of our relationship and the strength of her character.
Then yes, you would first be told to immediately get lost and if you refused, you would be assisted.
What would possess someone to go after someone’s wife and marriage over the bland comments I made about the interview I watched? Are you new to this site, one that is usually the model for civil discussion of tough subject
Poorly played, ungallant and just downright creepy for the both of yunz.
This is a site for commentary and my comment is you sound like a guy who thinks his wife is property. Everything you’ve said since then reinforces my opinion, including that you toss out dinner guests who dare to disagree with you.
So i guess I should amend my comment that you believe you get to tell everyone what to say and if they don’t comply, you get physical. What a guy!
But hey, this is just my opinion. I don’t get why you care one way or the other.
What is the definition of is? Talk about splitting hairs.
Are you double teaming or do you have a point?
But, hey, if you just want to jump in, whatever floats your boat is okay with me.
No it’s me, disturbed by how much you’ve read into this guy..
You will be disappointed if you expect people to always agree with each other.
If you are “disturbed” by what you read in a comment, one suggestion is to mention what disturbs you, so you can clarify the disagreement. For example, it seems you like this guy Tate. If so, why not mention what you think is good about him? You could possibly change someone’s mind, not mine, but someone else’s perhaps.
But a cryptic comment about you being “disturbed” sort of flattens the conversation. Though again I’d like to remind you that people do see things differently.
You honed in on that poster for using the word “the” and assumed a lot about him. That’s ridiculous.
Second, I do NOT like Andrew Tate, I argued if he actually raped women or rather manipulated them into sex with him, then talked them into doing videos. I don’t see the crime, but did you miss how I called him a POS sleezebag?
You see what you want to see in a poster and it doesn’t contribute to the conversation getting personal with someone and falsely accusing them of being something they’re not.
Maybe you should have stayed on topic instead of pointing something out you assumed about their marriage because of a choice of words.
This almost seems like a Dem tactic of argument, not unlike what we saw today in that awful IRS whistleblower interview in Congress today.
Well, I disagree with most of what you said, but I appreciate you saying what you think.
As for me, “the” did catch my attention, though I agree with your comment that it can be an ordinary way of speaking. But if you notice, the “ther” caught the attention of a commenter before my post. I think we two were reacting to the poster’s post as a whole, and “the” wasn’t the main reason I replied to the poster.
The main reason I replied was what seemed to me to be his assumption that it didn’t bother “his” wife so therefore there was no bother. In other words, he and “the wife” (the way I heard it, an extension of him) were the definitive statement on the issue.
The poster wasn’t interested in what anyone else thought (or any other woman either). And the rest of his post more or less said no one else should be bothered because after all in this climate reasonable people must not judge too quickly.
I do judge Tate and think his whole deal is about money, that his goal is to make money, from pimping apparently, and also apparently from coaching/influencing men. My view is in the first video he was focused on positioning/marketing his pimping business. In the second video interview with Tucker, he was obviously focused on talking to Tucker, but also I think he was position/marketing his coaching/influencing business (more or less the same talking points he uses when he deals with that business).
I don’t believe I did get personal. I would have prefered to have a conversation, but I also didn’t want to act like the poster was having a conversation when he clearly believed his word was definitive and then he mentioned a commenter who challenged him was lucky not to do that in person. Go back and look at the thread. If any one got persona, it was that poster.
I want to say again I appreciate you sharing your ideas. Obviously we don’t agree, but we got to have a conversation and to me that’s what matters.
Only about 99% of all married men will sometimes refer to their spouse as, “My Wife”.
I watched this a few days ago and am 21 minutes into rewatching it now. While I love CTH and have learned so much here, I disagree with Sundance’s take on this video and what it says about Tucker Carlson. At cursory glance, it appears that Andrew Tate has done some unsavory things to make money. But Tate’s business model isn’t what drew Carlson to Romania to interview him. Carlson’s opening monologue concerns the plight of young men and boys in the present-day West—Tate’s major focus.
To me the video looks like a longer-form version of the old-style interviews you’d see on 60 Minutes. Carlson is not there to combat or chide Tate regarding what the borg is saying about him; he’s there to interview the man because no one else has interviewed him or will.
Tate is not supposed to be given a platform to speak, period. Having a civil conversation with him to get his side of the story is verboten. That should motivate anyone interested in truth to want to listen to what Tate has to say. The interview is two and a half hours long, and it’s riveting from start to finish. I don’t know if Tate is telling the truth or not about the charges against him, but that should be easy enough to verify, and in any case, hopefully we will learn more about the facts when the case goes to court. I’m the meantime, aside from the charges against him, Andrew Tate has led an interesting life, and much of his commentary on men and women, censorship, COVID, and the nature of truth is definitely worth hearing.
How can you be 21 min into a 6 min video?
He’s referring to the actual interview, not the six-minute takedown.
The interview is just over 2-1/2 hours long
There’s 2 videos, one of them is over 2 hours long
Interesting, maybe I’ll watch it but would prefer a better role model for young men. It’s too bad it’s Andrew Tate.
Jesus is a real good role model for young men and everyone else.
That’s already understood.
I’m going to go out on a limb and completely disagree with the premise of this article. I feel like Tucker, as usual, just allowed someone to speak, and by extension, allowed you… The viewer… To come to your own conclusions. That’s the point of his whole game as far as I’m concerned. Perhaps Tucker is an asset, but if he is, I would argue that he is the one that was authorized to completely tell the truth. Everything is an illusion, and it is up to us to discern the truth from within it. I think Tucker touches upon a lot of truth. And for this reason he has my respect. I watch everything very carefully. Including posts on this site! The truth is very slippery at the moment and don’t for one minute think that any particular source is 100% pure. None of them are, as well as none of us. We are all imperfect beings, hopefully inspired by a love of God, and country. I’m still looking for any actual proof that Tucker is compromised. And if he is… Please post credible evidence. Also, please state how the message he is delivering is anything other than the pure and unadulterated thought of one man’s mind. I’m not one to 100% agree with anyone. Including Tucker. But I have yet to see evidence that he is operating on the level that is not pure.
That’s my opinion. You do not have to agree. We do not have to agree. But please present credible evidence, and many of the comments here are simply untrue.
“Tucker, as usual, just allowed someone to speak, and by extension, allowed you… The viewer… To come to your own conclusions.”
Exactly. And specifically regarding this interview, I wish I had heard someone like him saying similar things when I was a teenager and young man. It would have helped me make better choices at the time.
As it is, at 50, I am getting something out of listening to him now. I’m thankful that Tucker interviewed him so I can hear what he has to say.
Is this week the Season 5 drop of the Andrew Tate Distraction?
Seems like a fair interview – what do you know that makes Tucker irresponsible for conducting this interview ?
Devastating!?!? Given to hyperbole much?
Think what you will of Andrew Tate, unless they have strong evidence of him holding any of these women against their will, he’s not a “trafficker.” I can think of a MLB player who got his career ruined by a woman who accused him – after the fact – of pretty much what Tate is being accused of. The MLB player was acquitted, yet his career is still in tatters.
The truth of the matter is, in the age of “Me too” and “believe all women”, women lie to ruin men, and mostly get away with it. Call me names, or whatever, reality is what reality is. Tate is a dirt bag, but a criminal? I look at where he is in jail, Romania. They couldn’t get him in the UK or the US, so a former Soviet bloc country vying for western aid nailed him where a conviction is easier to get.
Would “making an example” of Andrew Tate as a “trafficker” be the borg’s response to “Sound of Freedom”? But nevermind the border, the people who went to Epstein Island, children made vulnerable by war, etc.
It’s a compelling question, actually. Tate goes against the grain, as it were. And, he has (according to some sources) a growing audience of boys and young men. What Tate espouses, in effect, could neutralize feminism’s impact on the next generation of males. Some of what Tate pushes to young males – health, exercise, wealth building, being in charge of your own life – runs counter to the feminist left’s message.
Tate reminds me a lot of Joe Bidens favorite son, Hunter Biden. Interesting isnt it…
Probably just a coincidence and as usual I will suppress the gut feeling and keep watching.
Be clear and not speak in innuendo.
Tucker is on the laptop from hell identified through emails exchanged between himself and Hunter Biden being a former neighbor and apparently close friend in DC. The wife too. They did favors for each other. This is Fact.
Probably just a coincidence.
Who really knows Tucker’s true thought on things. In looking up an article he wrote about President Trump in 2016 that I couldn’t find on my bookmarks, but didn’t forget, some articles came up saying Tucker hates President Trump with a passion and couldn’t wait for him to be gone 202o election, according to texts that came up with the Dominion trial. He might be playing all of us to some extent because he has no other audience.
Im just saying Tate reminds me of Hunter and there is a connection to Tucker through Hunter. Just a coincidence I suppose.
That is all.
Tate reminds me of Hunter as well, and also the guy who several years ago promoted the “girls gone wild” videos (Joe something?). For all of them, it’s all about money.
What is your evidence that Tucker is wrong about Tate?
First video. – 6 minute video
O’Reilly interviewed David Duke. I think Tucker’s career will survive.
What else can Andrew Tate say?
Pimpin’ ain’t easy!
I had watched this interview when it first came out; and subsequent to that was the speech that Tucker Carlson gave this past week before President Trump came out to speak, and had made a comment that I could not tolerate the histrionic laughing spells that Tucker breaks out into.
Of course, feedback came and I really thought about what it is that my gut says is the reason why I find his fits of hysteric laughing intolerable and realized it is the laughter of someone who is saying something he doesn’t believe but can’t help laughing at the fools buying his spiel –
don’t get me wrong, I am enjoying the sunlight that he is inadvertently, and unintentionally shining on the ‘elite power brokers’,
and so will explain the source of my reaction comes from personal experience from two very devious conmen (which through meticulous records eventually, decades later, put them in jail for, given their age when the feds finally got around to dealing with them, was life sentences).
I do truly hope I am wrong in this assessment, perhaps he just has a weird laugh that resembles those others but . . .
am going to wait and see.
Regarding Mr. Tate, love him or hate him, he brought the legal heat onto himself by simply tweeting a response to Greta “How Dare You” Thunberg – that was all that was needed to get the Romanian authorities to upend Mr. Tate and his brother’s life. His own hubris brought him to this point in his life.
Andrew Tate has been under investigation since 2015 in Great Britain. Tate started the fracas with Thunberg in December of 2022, 8 months AFTER Romanian police opened up an entirely new investigation of new accusations brought in Romania about new crimes supposedly committed in Romania.
Thanks; my memory of the timeline of when he made the Greta tweet and his and his brother’s actual arrest and incarceration may be off. We’re getting hit with so many things to keep on top of, getting sequences wrong is easy enough to do. Clarifications always appreciated.
Interesting comment. I’m going to think about it.
The laugh bothers me as well. My reason it’s like a frat boy who loves sticking it to authority and who is convinced the world is his oyster.
It reminds me of the same laugh De Santis sometimes uses (both are proud to have attended elite Eastern schools).
Devastating? “Devastating” is the copious amount of rope Tucker gave that man (if you can ever call that a “man” – he’s more like an amoral tomcat) to hang hisself with before the Romanian court.
There are quite a bunch of men who think like this amoral tomcat out there. About a month ago on Twitter, there was some guy posing with a woman at the balcony of a restaurant. He was bragging on his tweet about how he had just “ejaculated inside this beautiful lady” while inside the bathroom of that same restaurant, with a grin that should make the Cheshire Cat blush. An update was given later informing he was arrested for soliciting prostitution.
That is the kind of ravenous beast the Tate brothers are. Tucker just gave them plenty of rope. The Romanian courts will see to it they hang from a lamppost soon.
My Calico is HIGHLY offended at your libeling of male cats everywhere!
C,mon Sundance. Tucker also interviewed Pence, did he not? We ‘watchers’ are supposed to examine all we can get to, and then form an opinion. I see Tucker as providing a service that we require. I do not see this particular interview as “devastating” to his career. This MAY be a rare instance of your being mistaken.
I’m waiting to see any evidence of either. I know when you’re demonized by mainstream society I’m immediately suspicious of the motive. Most of what both say coincides with my views. We will see if it’s an act of manipulation or not.
I have to admit, unfortunately back in the day when I was pimpin’, I as well had to get fresh with the girls a time or two. It comes with the job.
tucker factor: to boast in a vaunting shameless style, usually to get attention to self and not about the subject. (note: “factor” is a tongue in cheek reference also to his o’reilly days)
usage:
the tucker factor is strong with andrew tate.
also related:
“tate” – a very scary and strange, usually violent jarring one time relationship with a sexual deviant and creep.
did you go on a “tate” with that dude?
yes, what a creep. I had to taze him and bear spray that wack job before I escaped.
I had never seen the video clips of Tate you showed during the 6 minute one. Wow
people dont wear socks anymore
“people don’t wear socks anymore” – just the frat boys who refuse to grow up.
You must look awful silly when you put on your flip flops to go to the Home Depot to look at tools.
Tate’s shoes looked like the shoes Muslim men wear under their long robes. I’ve seen them before in Israel. Tate is Muslim and in one post he was cheering for Great Britain to become a Muslim stronghold. A billionaire Muslim has bought the Trocadero in the center of London to build a 3 story mosque there.. Tate seemed pleased with that and called Allah a great “planner.”It is what it is.
Could care less who Tate is unless he’s trying to destroy my country or trying to harm anyone in my family. As for Tucker, I enjoy and share much of what he says however, as with anyone just because I do doesn’t mean I buy into everything he says. There was only one perfect human – Jesus – and for the most part Tucker believes or seems to believe in most of what is printed on this site.
Like they say, there is only one perfect candidate for President and that’s yourself.
I will fight tooth-and-nail to re-elect Trump but that doesn’t mean Trump doesn’t also have his failings – we all do.
I listened to the whole interview when it first came out. I’ve long held the opinion that women are making a huge mistake by buying into the idea that they are empowered by having lots of sexual partners. I also have long believed that women naturally seek out security since they want their children to be safe and that that translates into “money” in the modern world (and, like a lot of our natural impulses, can get warped at times into caricatures). Except for believing in a religion whose founder liked and advocated beheading people and having sex with children, I didn’t see a lot wrong with what he said and I don’t believe, from what I heard,that he was trafficking. I think our government would hate him for his strong masculinity and for teaching self-reliance. I guess I’m missing something.
C’mon boys and girls. We complain that we only hear from people we agree with in the MSM. It is hypocritical to try and shut someone else down. Knowing nothing about Andrew Tate, I still got the message through the interview that what he has done is morally repugnant. Filtering what else he said through that, let me evaluate his sincerity and credibility. I heard him. I don’t have to like him.
Now when someone brings up his name in conversation, I have an informed opinion.
You couldn’t be more wrong. This is the problem with the boomer generation. You’re all low consciousness people who think Christ is some “man in the sky”.
Really you’re little better than sociopaths. The way you raised your children, the way you selfishly made every decision based on scarcity and fear. The way you try to tell others how to live based on that fear.
Tate is the social media equivalent to Trump, and that’s why he’s being attacked.
Trump was falsely accused over and over with more “evidence” than what’s being used against tate.
To step out of your lane and write this piece shows the lack of judgement.
Stick to analyzing politics, you’re removed from what Men, especially young men, have to deal with in the current social climate.
This^^^^ You forgot to mention that boomers also left the bill for this mess to future generations to take care of.
The moment enough people realize all we have to do is walk away…
You’re not going to be able to walk away without somehow paying the piper. So walk away and see what you can buy with your fiat currency
Now do Roosh V
Live your best life unless you’re not approved of by Jim.
Last I heard Roosh had dedicated himself to Christ, that was 6 years ago I believe. You have an issue with that?
These are the types of “conservatives” that need to go.
your first mistake is simplifying how other view christ…a stereotype that actually does not exist in the broad way that you present it.
your second mistake, another stereotype, broad in it’s generalization…again..is that everything that is wrong in YOUR LIFE…is somehow related to boomers.
third mistake? sociopath?
good job..
you are fired.
and noting: you apparently have very little understanding about how EVERYTHING is related to politics…including the mouthpiece tucker carlson…who has drawn more than just a little suspicious eyebrows about where his interests align.
God Bless America
Frankly, I couldn’t care less about Andrew Take one way or the other. Tucker tells the truth on most of the real issues that matter to regular people, so I will continue to support him. I’m still not going to follow him or anybody else on twitter though.
I watched the entire interview that Tucker did in Romania. After seeing the first video above, I am sickened that Tucker would stoop to give credence to this blowhard. The interview with Tucker is attempt to rehabilitate AT and while he says a number of things I agree with on manhood, the first video shows him to be a low life thug who needs to take his own medicine.
Andrew Tate is what we called back in the day, “a glorified PIMP”. The only difference is that most of what he did was an online service & the women were not psychically accessed, unless the money offered was huge. Heck, Rooster from Starsky & Hutch had more finesse than this guy. Depending on who you believe, he paid the women well and what the women did was of their own decisions.
Lots of bad judgment here and as a matter of fact, there is bad judgement here by all involved, including Tucker. Tucker should have known better than to take sides in all this, especially when there are so many sides to take! smh
I for one do not like the Tates… & pop culture has truly gone to the dark side.
I hardly think felony convictions, prison, and asset seizure is a punishment that fits the crime. The guy is a womanizing DB but when did it become a felony to manipulate women for sex? It’s a sin, it’s gross, and it’s something that leaves him and the female worse off- but a felony? Using the State to get revenge on the fool is a slippery slope. Basically most teen boys, college “men” and single (and some married) men try to manipulate a woman for sex at least once in their lives- will they locking up men who are trying to score now? Of course they will! That’s the goal. Persecute and marginalize men. His big mouth, jerkdom and narcissism made him a target in a highly feminized world- and he had money for the State to go after. That’s really the bottom line here- take his cash and persecute men.
Carlson just slaughtered the entire GOP field except Trump at Family Leadership Summit, then made a fool of Pence at Turning Point.
Because I trust literally no one politically, I find the timing of this article “interesting”. Does the establishment want Carlson discredited, right now, for some reason?
Coincidence?
Thank You Sundance.
So, Is Tuckers next interview with Satan (sarcasm) !!! 🤔 Why did he have such an interest in this guy???
Yeah…Tate is a bombastic, pompous, loudmouth with as much depth as a dixie cup and as broad insight as Mr. Magoo. I really cannot stand this guy. He can’t hold a candle to Jordan Peterson.
Some on here might want to watch this before passing too much harsh criticism on Tucker.
Chadwick Moore: The Gravitas Of Tucker Carlson And Arrogance Of Fox
https://rumble.com/v30ylxo-chadwick-moore-the-gravitas-of-tucker-carlson-and-arrogance-of-fox.html