Devin Nunes was previously the Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. In that very specific role, Nunes was a member of the Gang of Eight who are briefed on all intelligence issues at the same level as the President, the chief executive. The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman, is the #2 ranking intelligence oversight member within the national security oversight apparatus, exceeded in rank amid the Gang of Eight group only by the House Speaker.
As the HPSCI chairman, Nunes has a very granular understanding of intelligence language and the way the intelligence apparatus uses words within national security documents. When Nunes talks about national security documents, he is a subject matter expert on the administration side of the process. Why is that important right now? Because Nunes knows how to contrast the wording in the Jack Smith indictment against wording used to describe national security documents.
Pay very close attention to this interview, prompted to 05:06, for the Nunes part. You have to get past the paid to obfuscate Mrs. Hannity interruptus, as she tries to shut down Nunes from bringing sunlight on the indictment. However, what Nunes introduces in his comments is the origin of what I am going to explain after the interview.
This is a game-changing context for the Jack Smith indictment. Again, pay close attention. WATCH:
.
What almost everyone in professional narrative engineering/punditry is missing, many of them because they are paid to pretend not to know, is that the national archivists gave sworn testimony to Congress about the Trump documents on May 17, 2023 {citation}. What I am going to outline below will explain the fraud that Jack Smith and his Lawfare crew are purposefully generating.
Some baselines are needed for you to understand what is happening.
First, the National Archives and the DOJ did not demand a return of Classified Documents. They requested a return of documents containing classification markings. These are two entirely different things.
Most documents containing classification markings are not classified documents; yet, most classified documents contain classification markings. Additionally, one of the documents used by Jack Smith in his indictment [COUNT #11] contained no markings at all.
Second, it is critically important to remember that throughout the legal issues in the aftermath of the Mar-a-Lago raid, the DOJ has viciously denied any responsibility to describe the classified documents they claim to have retrieved. In fact, the DOJ has fought against any entity, including the court appointed “special master”, from being able to look at the documents the DOJ *previously* claimed were either classified, or, vital to national security. {GO DEEP}
Because there is a very specific type of Lawfare taking place with words, it is critical to see the value in what Devin Nunes understands about the way the language is being deployed. Now we return to the testimony of the national archivist office, and here is where it gets really interesting.
♦ During testimony to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) officials were asked specifically about Trump documents and how they could *KNOW* fulsome return of documents had not taken place. The response from the NARA officials is enlightening:
[Source pdf, testimony transcript – page 43 and 44]
Notice that NARA had knowledge these documents were in the possession of Trump and were pertinent to their archive retrieval. It was interesting at the time that NARA would know the content of the President Obama letter, and further interesting they would know there was more than one piece of correspondence between President Trump and Chairman Kim [Jong-un]. CNN even wrote about it HERE.
[Irrelevant note: Mr Bonsanko got the name wrong, Jong-il is dead]
Reminder, keep in mind the DOJ ferocity in not wanting anyone to know what documents they retrieved and/or defined.
We know, from President Trump describing the letter left to him by the former president, that Obama told Trump in the letter that the number one foreign policy and intelligence threat perceived by Obama (at the time of his exit) was a nuclear armed North Korea. This is where you overlay the Jack Smith writing in the indictment of national defense secrets and nuclear security issues.
We know, from President Trump speaking publicly about his communication and diplomacy with Chairman Kim Jong-un, that the two leaders exchanged letters relating to aligned national security interests that centered around DPRK nuclear ambitions and status.
Trump and Kim formed a geopolitical truce, a friendship of sorts, based on respect and trust around the nuclear issue. Chairman Kim decreased hostilities; President Trump no longer used inflammatory language about “Little Rocket Man.” A diplomatic détente was created.
NARA was looking for the letter written by Obama that described DPRK nukes, and NARA was looking for letters between Trump and Kim that touched on DPRK nukes.
Now, does the wording in the Jack Smith indictment that pertains to “nuclear concerns” and “national security matters” make more sense?
Would all of this “nuclear national defense” hullaballoo really stem from President Trump not giving up personal letters written to him by President Obama and Chairman Kim? YES! Would President Trump even characterize those letters as government property? NO!
♦ The indictment accuses President Trump of withholding documents containing “classified markings,” a very specifically deployed obtuse wording intended to create the implication of something nefarious where nothing nefarious exists. It is entirely possible for a person, any person, especially a person who follows the news, to possess documents containing “classified markings.”
There is a big difference between a classified document and a document containing classified markings. As an example, anyone who has looked at the Carter Page FISA application, made public in July 2018, has reviewed a document containing “classified markings.” When a document is declassified, they do not remove the markings.
This language is the underpinning of the entire DOJ/FBI framework that predicated the raid on Mar-a-Lago. Specifically, neither NARA nor the DOJ-NSD requested President Trump or his team to return Classified Documents. The DOJ demanded the return of any documents that contained “classified markings.” [SEE BELOW]
Because the verbiage is so intentionally obtuse (ie. Lawfare), a fulsome production in compliance with this DOJ demand would include any newspaper or magazine articles that had a picture of the Carter Page FISA application, or any printed online article that might contain the same or similar elements. There is a big difference between asking for a classified document return, and asking for a return of documents that contain “classified markings.”
Can you see the way it unfolds? Of course, when you apply the Lawfare lingo, an approach entirely based on maintaining the targeting of Trump, then suddenly the seemingly innocuous becomes horribly nefarious.
In order to pull this off two things would be needed: (1) the DOJ would need to write about it in a certain way in the indictment√; and (2) simultaneously, the DOJ would need to stop anyone from viewing the actual documents, as they misleadingly described them√. Hey, wait… that’s exactly what they did.
♦ In a previous court ruling by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, the court ruled in favor of the U.S. Dept of Justice – National Security Division (DOJ-NSD), and blocked the lower court order instructing a Special Master to review the DOJ claimed, “classified documents.” [pdf Ruling Here]
Essentially the order of the appellate court was based on the DOJ defining Trump’s Mar-a-Lago documents as “classified” and “vital to national security”, and the court’s determination said they have no authority to question the decision of the executive branch when it comes to how they DEFINE matters of national security.
The court (judicial branch) openly stated they defer to the DOJ (executive branch) regarding any/all claims of harm to national security that may be caused by a review of documents the DOJ-NSD determined, on their own authority, to be identified as classified or matters of “national security.”
In the prior opinion of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, if the DOJ states sharing the “classified documents” with a special master may harm national security, the court must accept that position without challenge and stop the special master review.
The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals did what the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) does with the DOJ-NSD and any matters defined by the originating Main Justice officials as “national security.” The 11th Circuit is deferred to the DOJ.
The DOJ was granted legal benefit of the doubt on all matters of national security, which puts the DOJ-NSD in ultimate control over the star chamber they operate.
This ridiculous ruling meant the DOJ could define any document as a document of “national security interest” and there is no countervailing review of their definitions. As soon as this decision was reached the DOJ then moved to appoint a special counsel. Can you see how this works?
With this ruling in his briefcase, Special Counsel Jack Smith could now define the Mar-a-Lago documents according to the legal intention of his targeting. That’s exactly what he did. The case against Trump is not a case about classified documents, it is a case about the DOJ defining unilaterally what documents are considered “vital to national security.”
With the DOJ getting to define those documents, the special counsel then moves to claim national security threats created by Trump’s ownership. The overlay of “vital to the nuclear capabilities of the defense dept,” can then be shifted to include letters from President Obama and Kim Jong-un about DPRK nuclear capabilities.
But wait, it gets better….
♦ First, ask yourself why would President Obama write about the DPRK nuclear threat in his letter welcoming President-elect Trump to the White House? It always struck me as odd, even years ago, when Trump would talk about this issue. It never made sense why President Obama would memorialize that type of an issue in writing, until today.
Normally that type of national security policy and leadership challenge issue would be part of a conversation. “Mr. Trump, as I depart office the number one issue you might first want to deal with on a national security basis is the nuclear ambitions of North Korea, here’s my opinion“… and so it would go.
Why write it down?
Why memorialize the nuclear threat of North Korea in a letter welcoming Donald Trump? Well, if the Obama intention was to create a written record that would always mean his letter was going to remain hidden from public review, then writing about DPRK nukes would be a way to make that happen.
Lastly, who would know about the content of the letter that President Obama wrote to President-elect Trump, specifically as it centers around a national security issue? Who would know what Obama wrote to Trump?
Lisa Monaco would certainly know the content of the letter written by Barack Obama to Donald Trump; she, Susan Rice and Kathryn Ruemmler might have even assisted in the writing of it. Remember, it was Susan Rice who wrote the January 20th “by the book” memo memorializing the FBI targeting of Trump, and Kathryn Ruemmler represented Susan Rice as her lawyer when investigators made inquiry.
Lisa Monaco was previously President Obama’s senior advisor for national security. Monaco is now the Deputy Attorney General to AG Merrick Garland.
Deputy AG Lisa Monaco is the head of the DOJ operation that was targeting the Trump Mar-a-Lago documents and framing the legal issues for the DOJ to use in court. Monaco would know that any production of documents that did not include the Obama letter would mean a “national security document” remained in Mar-a-Lago.
Special Counsel Jack Smith also reports to Lisa Monaco.
Things making sense now?
♦ There is also a letter from lawyers representing President Trump to the chair of the House Intel Committee that is very interesting [pdf available here]. The letter was written to the HPSCI prior to the testimony by officials for NARA
The letter is written to HPSCI Chair Mike Turner and copied to the other seven members of the gang-of-eight in the Senate and House. The letter outlines the details of the documents that became the contested issue between the DOJ-National Security Division (‘NSD’, important distinction), specifically a DOJ-NSD official named Jay Bratt, and the attorney for President Trump, Mr. Evan Corcoran.
The letter is fascinating because it outlines how the process of moving documents from the White House was weaponized by a politically motivated National Archives and Records Administration (“NARA”), and the letter also gives fulsome context to the types of “classified materials” that have been insanely over emphasized by media.
[…] “Tim Parlatore and Jim Trusty, two of the undersigned counsel for President Trump, reviewed all 15 boxes at NARA earlier this year and based on that review, it is clear to us what happened. The boxes contain all manner of documents from the White House, are loosely grouped by date, and include newspapers, magazines, notes, letters, and daily schedules. Following its review of the materials, NARA inserted placeholder pages where it had removed documents with classification markings. That allowed Messrs. Parlatore and Trusty to discern what the documents were, as well as what other materials in the boxes were in the proximity of the marked documents when the White House staff packed them. The vast majority of the placeholder inserts refer to briefings for phone calls with foreign leaders that were located near the schedule for those calls.” (page 3, pdf link)
Additionally, get this part… despite the standard process that has been in place for the prior four administrations, the NARA refused to participate in the collection of any documents from the White House during the transition phase following the November 2020 election.
The NARA refused to assist in the collection of the Trump records for national archive holding and review, and then the NARA triggered a sequence of events that led to the DOJ using a reference from the NARA, to weaponize a process they refused to engage in. The NARA refused to do their specialized bureaucratic job, and then the NARA used what they defined as an incomplete job as a reason to refer the outcome to the DOJ. The details are quite interesting.
The letter details how the DOJ-NSD then weaponized the process, fought with the FBI investigative and supervisory agents who were saying Trump was doing nothing wrong, and then culminating in a documented lie to the Florida magistrate, in order to get a politically motivated search warrant.
The DOJ will not release the documents they used to convince the judge to obtain the warrant. Additionally, the DOJ will not release a list of the documents, or even describe the documents, they later claimed are classified. To this date, the Trump defense team is being told President Trump held classified documents, yet the DOJ will not describe to the lawyers who represent President Trump, what specifically those classified documents are.
I just love the way you busted on Woodward!
Hilarious 😂
The very same CIA media plant who framed Nixon based on a top CIA persons (deep throat) statements about Watergate, wherein 7 people attempted a robbery, three or four of whom were connected to, you guessed it, the CIA.
Try up to possibly 9, led by James McCord, possible father of Mary McCord, of recent and current infamy.
“I think that the decision to nominate the story for a Pulitzer is of minimal consequence… I also think that it won is of little consequence.
“It is a brilliant story – fake and fraud that it is. It would be absurd for me or any other editor to review the authenticity or accuracy of stories that are nominated for prizes.”
–Bod Woodward
Bob Woodward: The Fallible Eighties
midnightwriternews.com/bob-woodward-the-fallible-eighties/
The only difference between the Get Nixon Hoax and Get Trump Hoax, is by degree and detail. Woodward has been pretending most of his life.
Orange Man Transparent is an existential threat to mockingturd grifters.
Get Trump First = Get America First
“Why isn’t the media asking who gave Crooked Hillary Clinton’s ‘plumbers’ their orders?
“With Watergate it was the coverup that turned out to be the far bigger crime. With Hillarygate it is the Mainstream Media Coverup that is almost as big of a crime as the act of treasonous espionage itself.
“It is showing the world why our media is truly the enemy of the people!”
— Donald J. Trump Feb. 16, 2022
watergate.info/1997/06/17/yes-watergate-was-a-coup-detat.htmlrichard-nixon/
I laughed watching one of Woodward’s online journalism courses.
He’s fanatically obsessed with Orange Man Innocent.
He mentally marinates in his sweat like a creepy sleaze drooling on a cam.
I always laugh at how the press holds up Woodward and Carl Bernstein has these great investigative reporters when they were spoon – fed entirely with all the Watergate information by Mark Felt.
They better hope Obama burned his copy of the same letter that he took with him when he left office. If I’m Trump’s lawyers, I’m subpoenaing the Obama library for their copy.
There is exactly 0% chance that Obama doesn’t have his copy. Or, that he wasn’t ALSO guilty of espionage based on the newly minted classification of “defense information”.
Trump’s lawyers need to get the whole case thrown out as a political prosecution. I suppose a way to accomplish this is show that other people with copies of the same letter were not prosecuted. Oh and they’re all political opponents of Trump.
Yeah, but, National Defense Information, REEEEE!!!!
Kek…kek…..
Forever Profits Better
Make Americans Pay Again
Goood Morning Kievnam!
Defense Contractors Rake in Millions as U.S. Seeks to Supply More Weapons to Ukraine
breitbart.com/politics/2023/01/18/defense-contractors-rake-in-millions-as-u-s-seeks-to-supply-more-weapons-to-ukraine/
Would Obama be required as a witness to produce the letter to Trump and to authenticate it. If the letter does not fall into the ‘Course of Business Record’ category producing it by anyone else would be a hearsay rule issue. Just a thought as I don’t know American law.
If the letter is de facto “hot stuff”, then the mere exchange of it from one to the other tagged one of them, as only one was a sitting president at the moment of transfer.
Chew on that.
Therr are “6ways from Sunday” to get this case tossed.
Its like you hardly have to aim.
Very Obama-like.
Leaving something as a PLANT TO LATER COME BACK AND PROSICUTE ON.
Curious if Obama’s letter to Trump is full of uhms and ahs.
Probably threats and other subterfuge
lol
“Ssssssss” sounds
More likely me and I.
“If, If, If…”
youtube.com/watch?v=poz6W0znOfk
so those letters are the DOJ basis for the indictment? when does the stuff concerning crossfire hurricaine cover up surface or continue to be covered up? Was there not a bunch of material DOJ does not want to surface? confused, I am
102 classified documents. Only 31 charges relating to classified documents.
I am confused too, Merry. I have the same questions.
HERE’S THE CACHE The WASHINGTON D.C. Office was Looking FOR –
( TAKE ALL with a Grain of Salt / a Lime and Tequila Shot )
https://www.newsweek.com/fbi-sought-documents-trump-hoarded-years-including-about-russiagate-1734280
Turning over the apple carts everywhere you can
Sands into the gears
Got it.
I missed something or it was unclear earlier via your twitter.
I do not understand the wording of this comment.
You’re not alone. 🤔
I think he’s just acknowledging he didn’t understand when Sundance went through the points in this article on his Twitter.
Probably not a high value revelation, I’d just do a D’oh and keep it to myself.
Sometimes the best responses are the “Duhs!!!” to oneself….
Why does this not surprise me at all?
Because everything else the corrupt government hacks have accused President Trump of doing has all been proven completely false and fabricated, so there’s no reason on earth that we should expect a sudden change in their behavior.
April Fool’s?
https://rumble.com/v2en5uk-january-6-care-package.html
🤣🤣
Pattern recognition.
Plainclothes cops at Capitol during Jan. 6 riot, one on video exhorting crowd, key lawmaker says
“Rep. Barry Loudermilk, R-Ga., the chairman of the House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight, said in wide-ranging interview Wednesday night that MPD body cam video that leaked onto the video platform Rumble is authentic and confirms that officers in plainclothes were at the riot.”
https://justthenews.com/government/congress/loudermilk-mpd-had-plain-clothed-officers-capitol-crowd-jan-6-2021
Been seeing that and then some on other sites.
Planned false flag to frame.
You are doing pure sunshine work Sundance! Please forward your work to TEAM TRUMP asap.
Todd Blanche
also:
Jim Trusty & John Rowley (I am certain they will still continue to work with TEAM TRUMP)
Benedict Kuehne
Lindsay Halligan
Timothy Parlatore ( I believe he remains loyal despite reports in the “news”)
this helps.
God Bless America
Please add Robert Barnes — Love him!!!!
Barnes would be a great asset to President Donald J Trumps legal team. I love him too. He was on Viva Frei and completely roasted these bogus charges…
He’s mentioned he consulted before, iirc.
DAMN Barnes IS PISSED OFF @ THE CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS on THIS INDICTMENT !
HE’s ” UP On PLANE ” !
https://rumble.com/v2tn4ac-get-this-video-to-trump-barnes-breaks-down-federal-indictment-viva-frei-liv.html
YES!
His podcast was great. He’s available if asked
Barnes
CC to: Eric Dubelier
easy..peasy
[email protected]
[email protected]
He roasted the Mueller team on the Concord Case. He understands their underhanded shenanigans like a pro. He has been there and done that. He knows exactly how to handle these lawfare gangsters.
SD is in the MAGADOME…
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/110322307286324332
I am no way as smart or as knowledgeable as you Sundance but this whole Jack “the ripper” Smith things is skidding off the wheels. Glad I am on course with you and the Treehouse. I hope we can all rest peacefully knowing that TRUTH has no agenda but the deep state certainly does. EVIL BASTRARD’s!!!
Many of these conspirators truly belong in the ninth circle of hell.
All one continuous scheme that’s still unfolding, with all the dregs and evils ensconced within it.
Justice, when it catches up with them all, will be biblical.
I’ll see your ‘many’ and raise you to ‘all.’
R F Burns: They are already there.
Rat bastagees….
This is such BS, so off the wall illegal
F-King deep state Dems
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/06/new-magistrate-preside-trumps-arraignment-florida-not-aileen/
It’s just the rubber stamping “not guilty”. 15 mins and it’s over
See! It all goes back to OSCUMA again.
Doesn’t everything? ValJar. Where is she?
I really don’t think they thought the indictment would flop as quickly as it has. They’ll get their photo op but Trump gets stronger.
The entire thing stunk the moment they rushed it out to distract from the Biden bribery scandal.
This is a political loss for the uniparty and the marxists.
Can’t wait for that thread tonight
They redacted the audiotapes stuff from the congressional doc review.
They’re toast when the days comes
Their evil persecution of President Trump is an indirect persecution of us. These lunatics have no idea that they are stoking President Trump’s support every time they pull these failed “operations”.
The pseudo-reality must be protected, to avoid the reality crisis.
Pretenders of the world, unite!
“Perhaps I have made a fool of myself, but that can always be remedied with a little bit of dialectics.”
— Karl Marx
Clearly, none of these cretins were ever taught proper etiquette and morals off school property….
This indictment is fast heading to suppository status for the likes of Jack Smith, Bill Barr, Merrick Garland etc.
blob:https://theconservativetreehouse.com/b115a63d-2af7-4d10-bdbb-9ef21ac418d0
Jack Smith has a group of relatives that just LOVE President Trump…..not.
Someone needs to read, “ Letters to Trump”.
The Obama deposition is going to be a doozey.
I am a Sundance Deputy and ready and willing to take orders. Do not know what I’d do without this site and insight. THANK YOU!!!
“All the marbles.”
Sundance NAILED IT
” FIGHTING FOR A MORAL ORDER ”
and YES Black Knight IT IS ” For ALL the marbles ” !
“I will host a press conference tomorrow at 10:30 AM EST at the Wilkie D. Ferguson Jr. US Courthouse in Miami, FL to discuss the politicized prosecution of the former president. I’ll make another announcement there as well. If the captured media fails to do its job, real leaders in this country need to step up and do it instead. Principles over politics.” — Vivek Ramaswamy, 6/12/23
Will he drop out of the race in protest and endorse president Trump tomorrow?
I’d say yes and maybe he will join his legal Team. Real men step up in times of trouble and then we have others who “run”, for office, any mike they can find and any media outlet that will let them speak. God Bless PDJT
This would be huge!!!
He just might. Dude seems honest. But more likely it’s a stunt of some sort.
I think he realizes his future depends on dropping out now
One can hope.
Oh PLEASE do it, Vivek! I don’t know much about you but what little I’ve seen I like. You’re the only other Rep candidate who doesn’t make me sick to my stomach.
If you announce you’re dropping out it will be huge, and will prove that you are indeed an honorable person. And I have no doubt there’ll be an important place for you in the Trump Administration. (A la Ben Carson)
Anyone who drops out is redeemable. Those that don’t
They are communists too
He should stay in the race and continue throwing sand from his at-the-moment more highly visible position, for instance in a presidential debate.
Don’t waste his “I’m dropping out now” ammo right now.
It would be a duty he could serve for his adopted country.
He was born in Cincinnati….how is America his adopted country?
agree – from the start, I’ve watched him get out there and say things that needed to be said, things the other side doesn’t want us to hear and doesn’t want heard or said
all to the good, I reckon
he’s noisy
in this media age, that equates to “he fights”
I think he WILL announce he is “dropping out” and importantly make the point KL and others have made, that any remaining in the race SHOULD drop out and support PDJT.
However, I think he is doing it as a politically calculated move; he IS a “splitter” candidate, but NOT to be a “splitter” for PDJT, but for KL.
Sorry Vivek, give em hell, speak MAGA as you do so well,..but you will NOT be PDJT’s second Pence.
This time around, PDJT will NOT allow the RNC to dictate the VP choice, or the terms of their surrender.
I doesn’t matter to me, but ymmv…
“I am pleased to see that Vivek Ramaswamy is doing so well in the most recent Republican Primary Poll, CBS YouGov. He is tied with Mike Pence, and seems to be on his way to catching Ron DeSanctimonious.
“The thing I like about Vivek is that he only has good things to say about ‘President Trump,’ and all that the Trump Administration has so successfully done—This is the reason he is doing so well. In any event, good luck to all of them, they will need it!”
–Donald J. Trump May 5, 2023
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/110317875844693831
In other words Bill Barr is a Fat Ass ,treasonous, fool.
3Mickey, spot on. I have always called Barr “debela guzica”, you just translated it for us all. Truer words have never been said. God Bless. Gospodi Pomiluj!!
unverified:
“Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman — not U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, who was randomly assigned Trump’s case — will be handling the former president’s arraignment and bond matters.
Cannon, who had been widely reported to be handling those duties, will still remain on the historic case as the lead judge.”
https://news.yahoo.com/magistrate-preside-over-trump-arraignment-174639347.html
consider the source as you would any other media source….yahoo does not produce how they have arrived at this information claim.
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article276328096.html
And why again is she “controversial’? Sarc 😉
the left catapulted this bias because some of her ruling swere shot down. I would not let that concern you. We understand that court judges are subject to and often are the center of much political bs.
God Bless America
Controversial inasmuchas the Left is loosing their minds because she understands the case and is sane and just.
Sundance, although the person did not explain the situation, some anchor said today it still has not been determined if the trial, should that occur at all, will be in DC or Miami.
Can you explain that statement?
?
Miami has jurisdiction
Barnes says DC should have no bar at all. It ain’t a state and has no real judicial power sans the scotus
( the ? was wrt the sundance part- we are of like mind, but entirely different people…other might see this and make the wrong assumption)
I do not know about the venue question..I’ve rolled it over and looked at it, and some of the elements of charges in the indictment could be argued that a DC venue is appropriate and some in miami. I made my amateur opinion that I would not be surprised that the case is splt between the two venues, or at the very least the prosecutors may argue over this issue.
but I was reminded with good reasoned replies from some trusted fellow treepers that since the prosecutor filed the indictment in miami and has not done so in miami, that argument even if it comes up might fall flat.
I also want to point out three facts to consider:
cannon is a trump apointee…and previous rulings show her to be bold and not a coward or a swamp critter!
Goodman, who will preside over arraingement (tuesday at 3 PM est) and bond hearings is also a Trump appointee who was sworn in days after President Trump was forced our of office . I do not know his particular legal background and what makes the man, only to say a brief review, shows he is also not a coward and has a sense of wit and humor and doesn’t get lost in attorney bs filing nonsense motions. So he seems to be a straight shooter. But he has a limited role here. He has stated he is not “paired with” cannon and he does not expect to remain after arraignment and bond hearings.
these are only my opinion and only those of regitiger.
God Bless America
If you’re a conservative Republican, the last place on earth, you want to be is in DC. That’s one of the biggest problems facing our country right now is that so many federal cases have statutory venue in Washington DC, where Republicans and conservatives cannot possibly get a fair trial.
Well, that man is ignorant and confused.
Ignorant of the constitution. Sixth Amendment requires that a trial take place in the state or district where the crime was committed.
Confused because they also have a Grand Jury in DC and it is expected that more charges will be filed in DC. So at least two trials by the fed. But then anchors are paid to misinform and confuse us.
BTW asking a third party to explain another person’s words without even saying who it was? When? Where? Providing a link? Really? At least it shows faith in Sundance. Though it is pretty close to thinking he is omniscient.
The DC trial may be a new “sedition” case that they plan to bring regarding the J6 fed-surrection. Different case and scarier. That is the next step on their coup agenda.
The oath keepers just lost a “sedition” case in DC regarding J6. That case gave Smith impetus to try and hang Trump for the same crimes and statutes.
Yes, they did manage to get a conviction on “seditious conspiracy” that should be overturned on appeal.
All 6 attempts by elias to try to use the 14th to prevent 6 congresspersons from running for office, he lost.
Either Sedition or Insurrection require overt acts of violence, inciting others to acts of violence or “acts of war” which is synonimous with acts if violence.
Hence, charges that PDJT engaged in a “Conspiracy to commit Sedition” (Or Insurrection) are as baseless as these Charges in Fla, the ones in NYC, or the ones the Ga prosecutor will be indicting him for, supposedly in August.
Its not about the charges, its about the headlines.
And, it AIN’T working.
I love that the dirtbags call HER controversial and not the corrupt Russia-hoaxing DOJ that filed the charges. I also love how they keep lying that he had “classified documents”.
Yahoo is the very last source I would ever turn to…
I do not rely on it…but after doing quite a bit of checking..yes, it would seem that Goodman will be presiding over arraingment and bond.
miami herald initially reported with closest sources. It would seem to be correct at this moment.
Goodman has already responded to several media queries about camera and photo ability in and around the court. And has made a statement that he has not been paired with Cannon and does not expect to work the trial other than the arraignment and bond issues.
you can of course ignore the typical orange man bad theme that yahoo is known for…
like most media outlets…there is usually some reliable facts covered in swamp goo.
God Bless America
Even a blind squirrel finds a nut from time to time – or as my old Southern Dad used to say, you gots to learn to pick the fly shit from the pepper. Cheers, regitiger, carry on good sir.
ty. and same to you and yours! God Bless America
Love “swamp goo” — perfect description
Listen to Barnes podcast. Start at 51 mins in. Great points on all levels of this mess. The legal protections PJT has is many
https://rumble.com/v2tkpjq-ep.-164-trumps-federal-indictment-and-other-law-stuffs…-viva-and-barnes-l.html
oh yeah, I’ve watched it about 4 times already in the last 24 hours. I’ve shared it with everyone I know. it’s very good reliable work.
it matches well to the work of Sundance and the work we do here at THE LAST REFUGE.
Its awesome. I hope President Trump and his team see it.
Posting this interview is an excellent move. I personally have watched it and I believe it would go a long way in reducing much of the, ‘legal speculation, being bantied about here and other places. It truly is a MUST WATCH.
Barnes video on vivafrei bookmarked for future reference when the media lies get hotter and heavier.
Thank you Sundance. You’ve answered the very question that coincidentally had me puzzled all day – among all the hundreds of thousands of documents that form part of a Presidential record, how on earth did NARA know exactly which documents to pursue zealously? To the point of referring a criminal indictment to the DOJ!
It was a setup from the very beginning. The non-cooperation to the outgoing administration was part of this odious and malevolent scheme.
Nara is as corrupt as any current agency
95% of dc must be culled from existence
Why stop there?
Have to have some workings for the remaining 5%. But sure 100%
They’re scratching the bottom of the barrel, aren’t they? BUT, BUT, THAT’S NOT WHAT BILL BARR TOLD ME ON THE TV.
I shall repeat again, because it serves Barr perfectly. ‘Debela Guzica, I will add stinking as well. How corrupt and evil can a person be. Boze sacuvaj! Lord protect us. Amin.
Not sure of the spelling, but in croatian; kur bin sin, ye bemte mater!
I learned it phonetically, not in writing.
It means not kind things about his maternal lineage and relationship.
“Most documents containing classification markings are not classified documents; yet most classified documents contain classification markings.”
Many leftists are shocked to learn this, but then argue even mishandling documents with classified markings was illegal.
Some even argue that documents that have been declassified have the classification markings removed from the document.
They’d be quite wrong on that point, in fact, that would then be a doctored document.
There is value in retaining those markings, even if, or perhaps especially if, there are annotations reflecting its declassification.
Well, the Classified docs hillary mishandled had the Classified headers removed, thats what has the leftists confused, not that it requires much to confuse them, as most still don’t understand traffic lights, and can’t march in formation.
She removed the headers.
They don’t argue; they simply cannot. They only parrot what they have been told. There is no thought behind their motivations, only raw and deadly emotions.
Complete malice and evil
They dont care cause now we’ve crossed over into keeps territory. There must be hangings for all these treasonous people.
If the country is to survive
True, they don’t argue much. They either do not respond because they have no argument since they are not told what to argue, or they react as you said, emotionally to the point of being unhinged and contradicting themselves.
They immediately go to personal attacks “jane you ignorant slut” mode.
The art of convoluting the meaning of words! I see this more and more among those who feign intelligence. The slimly little bastards!
Sophists, in the classic tradition. From their foreheads sprang the lawyers, fully formed, with suit and briefcase, ready for chaos and mayhem.
Critical Legal Studies
“Lying for the truth” in the Munzenberg tradition.
newcriterion.com/issues/1993/11/lying-for-the-truth-manzenberg-and-the-comintern
“Unless one uses language with precision, one is almost certain to fall into semantic ‘booby traps’.”
— E.C. Harwood
Man we have a tall order ahead of us to restore some semblance of honor to this gov’t. So much corruption!
I know we can do it tho. Americans are kinda badass.
“The flames kindled on the Fourth of July, 1776, have spread over too much of the globe to be extinguished by the feeble engines of despotism;
“on the contrary, they will consume these engines and all who work them.”
–Thomas Jefferson to John Adams, 1821
I sure would have liked to have heard a lot more Nunes and a lot less of the dimwit interviewer.
She added no value there. If you’re not even going to give him adequate time, let him use the time he has.
I could barely get past the Valley Girl accent, I can make out Cockney better that this…
If you turn off cable you don’t have to deal w/them.
I watch nothing on TV. I only watched it as a prelude to what followed in Sundance’s analysis.
My opinion, O put it in writing b/c he thought the situation with N Korea would continue to deteriorate, perhaps even blow up. That way he could say he warned our President Trump about the problem. Every thing these despicable crooks do is meant to set a trap to use.
Thank you sd. Great info and analysis. DJT could really use you on his defense team. I am hoping you have a contact that can get this analysis to him and his lawyers.
We know it’s a fraud because the last major DOJ investigation of Trump was a fraud. Sometimes it really is that simple.
I wonder if DOJ will be successful denying Trump access to exculpatory evidence by running to the 11 Circuit to claim (again) that they and only they may view the “evidence” against Trump.
They’re also going to run into ex post facto problems. They’re claiming a NEW interpretation of these documents that did not exist when Trump was given the records. In fact, it is highly unlikely the GSA (when they packed it all up) was told about the change in status of the documents.
Because that change in status hadn’t been thought up yet as a way to get around the Presidential Records Act and Trump’s declassification authority. It is illegal to prosecute somebody for something they did that was legal at the time they did it. IOW, you can’t declare something is now illegal and go back in time and prosecute past transgressions.
Finally, the DOJ ALSO has to make the case that the President’s plenary power to declassify documents doesn’t pertain to all levels of classification in the executive branch (including this newly invented one).
it is highly unlikely the GSA (when they packed it all up) was told about the change in status of the documents
What evidence do we have that GSA “packed it all up”?
Another treeper today similarly questioned the evidence that NARA packed boxes up and left them on the White House driveway and asked for a link to support that
To judge THAT question, I copied the link from one of the driveway photos on one of Sundance’s other articles and put it in a tineye image search, that ranks earliest date that a photo hit the internets
one of the earliest articles was from UK Daily Mail, who descried “aides” and “workers” and “White House staffers”– not identifying them any more specifically than that (nor should we expect them to be able to) – but at least it has numerous photos that provide a good photo-documentation of the moving process
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9149991/Flying-coop-White-House-staff-haul-away-reams-documents-art-stuffed-BIRD.html
so this doesn’t identify WHO or WHAT AGENCY was carrying those boxes out to the driveway and stacking them and loading them onto a white moving truck
but at least it captures photos of the actual process and pins the time
in one photo, someone is loading a large wall-mount photo in what looks like his personal car … I’d presume that was a White House aide who had permission to take that photo for pride of ownership for serving the administration or something
but I can’t tell from the article that it’s GSA or NARA carrying out the moving process
anyone able to get more specific than that and provide links?
I’ll do some more searching with keywords GSA and NARA when I get time; others are welcome to do the same
here’s the photo I tin-eyed
and here’s the search results
https://tineye.com/search/cc2c2c0ba7fdc99de8d7baa76846d21467c38d12?sort=crawl_date&order=asc&page=1
here’s a 2nd Daily Mail article with similar / same photos
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9151549/Trump-plans-fly-Mar-Lago-morning-inauguration-final-snub-Biden.html
Nice sleuthing , Nim 😊
And Appreciate the Tips on where You Looked !
Most Helpful Info 🌺
thx, Ryder
I just found 1 news article that says GSA packed up the boxes, see the Breitbart article below
ok, Hokkoda, here we go:
Sources: GSA Packed Boxes of Documents Trump Brought to Mar-a-Lago, Not Trump Political Staffers
Sources close to former President Donald Trump have confirmed to Breitbart News that the General Services Administration (GSA) packed the boxes of documents he took with him to Mar-a-Lago, not political staffers.
Shortly after the FBI raided Mar-a-Lago this month, reportedly to reclaim documents Donald Trump had taken from the White House in January 2021, journalist David Martosko announced that a source close to the former president confirmed the documents were boxed by government staffers in the GSA, not Trump’s own staffers.
“A person very close to Donald Trump tells me it’s indeed true what’s being bandied about Twitter — that the @USGSA, not Trump or anyone working for him in the White House, packed the boxes that the FBI took in Monday’s raid. If that’s true, it scrambles the omelet a bit,” Martosko announced.
… despite that, searching also turns up results like these below … one would have to weigh them all together to discern the greatest likelihood of being true
Trump Was Personally Involved in Packing Boxes, Moving Them to Mar-
Trump’s Aides Frantically Packed His Things to Leave the White House
Trump reportedly packed White House boxes in secret, took ‘top secret
It’s another bunch of circular “evidence” all manufactured, leaked, reported, investigated & prosecuted by the ic. The predicate & evidence is never intended to be seen by anyone.
They never change their MO.
Thanks for connecting the dots SD. You’re magnificent!
“Most documents containing classification markings are not classified documents; yet, most classified documents contain classification markings.”
Huh?
There are two basic types of government documents; classified and unclassified (there are actually many more categories of information but these are the two broad categories). There are two government IT systems used to handle them, NIPR (non-secure internet protocol routing) and SIPR (secure internet protocol routing). TOP SECRET gets its own IT system (JWICS) and handling requirements.
ALL documents with classification markings are classified. The classification markings (subject, paragraph) alert the reader to the classified info contained within the (classified) document. Documents without classification markings are unclassified.
Once classified documents that have been declassified still have classification markings, yet remain declassified.
Sundance has thousands of them, and we have seen and read hundreds of them on these pages.
With markings intact.
Except that when classified documents are declassified, they do not remove the classified markings. Consequently, your statement that ALL documents with classification markings are classified is false.
Uh, not all autos have 4 wheels, but having 4 wheels does not make something an auto?
All vegetables are food, but not all food is vegetables?
All leftists are emotion driven idiots, but not all emotion driven idiots are leftists?
when classified documents are declassified, the original markings remain.
Also note that the covers with classification markings photographed by the FIB were sans classified content. I think that somewhere along the way, the documents were removed and the covers put in as placeholders. May have even been placed by NARA. But my memory needs confirmation.
Those covers were explained as being used to ferry classified documents within the White House, and when the people that brought them they left with the papers and left the covers behind, they told PDJT they didn’t need them and they themselves weren’t classified or significant; so he kept many as souvenirs.
Thanks.
Empty covers with classified markings but no classified documents.
Wrong. Try again.
I don’t get how these letters are related to national security when they were written, let alone now?
Is this just a bone for the political hacks and low info voters to chew on?
It is the flimsiest reed upon which they hope to tie their credulity straining gossamer threads of accusation to The Espionage Act, itself a bit of a farce created by a tyrannical Woodrow Wilson to jail his opponents.
Remember the “Nuclear Secrets” they were screaming about last year?
These sweet nothings are those very weighty secrets.
They have the word “nuclear” in them. That makes it a matter of national defense.////
Had enough yet?
Orange Man Funny… “Build Chairs Bigger.”
Roger Stone Interviews President Donald Trump | 06-11-23
https://wabcradio.com/episode/roger-stone-interviews-president-donald-trump-06-11-23/
Does ANYONE ELSE SEE A PROBLEM with a Person Moving from DOJ FOIA Office:
” I served at the
Department of Justice as director of Freedom of Information
Act declassification and prepublication review at the
National Security Division, as well as deputy counsel for
intelligence policy, where I practiced in front of the U.S.
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, and acting chief —
first acting chief — for intelligence oversight at the
Department of Justice.”
TO NARA and :
” My name is Mark A. Bradley, and I currently serve as the
fifth director of the Information Security Oversight Office,
or ISOO as we are often called, at the National Archives and
Records Administration. As I will explain shortly, my office
plays an important role with respect to classification and
declassification, oversight and policy for the United States
Government’s executive branch. ”
” SLAP ” a CONFIDENTIAL ; SECRET or ABOVE Classification on the Document And IT’S NEVER QUESTIONED by the Beltway
( QUICK, i NEED a BLACK SHARPIE to COVER that FOIA Court Settlement )
NOTE: THEY LOVE the ALPHABET LETTERS where they occupy space.
ADDENDUM to the ABOVE POST –
DO YOUR OWN INTERNET SEARCH On this Gentleman.
A GOOD GUY OR BAD GUY –> YOU DECIDE. MY POINT IS HE MOVED FROM a JOB in DOJ to NARA by a TRANSFER and
” APPROVAL in DECEMEBER 5 2016 ”
LAWYER, CIA, NAVAL HISTORIAN, DOJ, NARA —-> ALL Beltway Gigs
It is being claimed that Donald Trump was indicted under a statute that makes it a crime to refuse to return National Defense Information documents when the government asks for them back.
It is being said by Trump’s defenders that the Presidential Records Act takes precedence over any other laws which might be applicable to government records, including 18 U.S.C. Section 793(e).
The implication here is that a former president doesn’t necessarily have to give back the documents which NARA wants him to give back.
As a former president, is he, or is he not, legally required to give back any and all material NARA asks for, both the originals and any copies of originals? What is the answer to this question?
What we haven’t seen so far is a detailed legal analysis which lays out the specific requirements of the various laws which have an influence in this matter.
That analysis must including an itemized list of what each law expects of a former president, what the law expects of NARA, and what processes the law specifies when a dispute exists between a former president and NARA over possession of government records.
Without having a detailed legal analysis at our disposal which covers these bases, we don’t really know how much danger President Trump is in from these indictments.
What’s to stop them from demanding anything from his 4 years as President?Once that camel is in your tent no telling what new charges the Feds could manufacture.
There is nothing to stop them. IMHO, the next item on the DOJ’s Get Trump at any Cost agenda is a set of indictments related to January 6th filed in a Washington DC court.
When the time comes that these charges are filed, we will need a detailed legal analysis of those charges for the same reason we need one for the Mar-a-Lago charges — to know every nook and cranny of the battlefield on which we fight.
I want the Biggest and Best Battleship ever made named after Donald J. Trump.
Think bigger. Battleships were WW2 targets. Aircraft carriers will be WW3 targets.
So, a starship?
Battlestar Trump, ala Galactica.
Affectionately known as the Bigly.
Next stop, MAGAVERSE, Trump speed!
Battle of Midway was in WWII.
The personal letters are covered under plenary authority of the president …in the case of Obama sending and Trump receiving. It’s not anything but personal docs
We all need to gain a complete understanding of the legal issues surrounding these charges, something which we as outside observers don’t have yet. We have important parts and pieces of information, but we don’t yet have a complete picture of the legal context in which all these various issues play a role.
You can keep repeating the same point, over and over, but repetition does not make it so.
You will find answers to most of your question here:
https://rumble.com/v2tn4ac-get-this-video-to-trump-barnes-breaks-down-federal-indictment-viva-frei-liv.html
As I said to Mr. Dutchman below, this fight will not be won unless every nook and cranny of the legal and constitutional issues surrounding this particular fight on this particular lawfare battlefield are being researched by competent legal talent; and are then being collected, itemized, and stored in a centralized, easily-referenced Internet location.
The Barnes video contains some of the necessary material. But the video and Lawyer Barnes’ commentary is a verbal communication of informed opinions. It is not something that is a coherently organized body of legal and constitutional opinion which can be quickly referenced and cited by those who of us who need it for pursuing informed debate with the TDS-ers among family, friends, relatives, and work colleagues.
Now I understand what you seek and I have to tell you that even if such a “Magical Black Box of Answers” existed it would not help you accomplish your goal of changing the minds of TDS-ers.
Those you wish to engage in debate do not function in a world of logic, otherwise they would not have TDS, they function in the world of feelings.
If you wish to change their minds, a Herculean task, then you need to engage them in their world of feelings.
Where you wish to tread is fraught with danger, akin to taming a lion. One moment you are viewed as a friend, the next moment as foe and the next moment as lunch.
If you are sincere in your endeavor, I suggest you first read and study all you can on Dian Fossey. From there you will need better minds than mine to guide you.
Yes of course, the TDS-ers will never change their minds. However, deep knowledge of a controversial topic in all its gory detail makes for effective debating ammunition.
The many TDS-ers I know personally have been true blue Democrats all of their lives and will not vote for any Republican, let alone Donald Trump, regardless of how bad things get in terms of crime, the economy, illegal immigration, and the cost of energy.
We are talking 40% of the population here who would throw every MAGA Republican into the Gulag without the slightest second thought. And who have knowingly bought in to election fraud as a valid means for keeping Democrats in power.
Truth be told, I get a perverse pleasure from demonstrating, in the most direct in-your-face way possible, that these people are not the intellectually and morally superior beings they make themselves out to be. Gaining a deep understanding of a topic based on easily-referenced and well-organized information is essential for this hobby.
This is why we digest CTH so ravenously and consistently, so we are our own selves that very source of information easily conveyed to others.
No one is going to do the digesting for us.
Rather imagine I like this approach better anyway.
When there is a conflict between provisions of a statute or between statutes the more specific provision applies.
I believe under the Presidential Records Act, there are presidential records, copies of presidential records, and personal records. The President is required to give back presidential records.
I believe the paper documents seized during the MAL raid with the exception of the Obama Letter to Trump and Kim Jong Un letter were copies of presidential records or personal records. The presidential record is the digital document President Trump electronically received not the paper copy he produced for “convenience of reference.”
Fuller explanation here…
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/06/11/sunday-talks-the-encapsulation/comment-page-2/#comment-9910676
“,..and what processes the law specifies when a dispute exists between a former President and NARA over possesion of government records.”
THAT,,RIGHT there is,a word perfect description of EXACTLY what the Presidential Records Act IS.
And there is a broad legal concept that a general law, written to apply to government employees and contractors is subservient to a more Specific law, that ONLY applies to former Presidents.
Also, that the Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land, and that it designates the President as the Commander in Chief.
And the sicks drawer decision, in which the Judge was quite specific in the absolute authority of a former President.
So, perhaps what YOU “haven’t seen” isn’t sufficient, but I have seen more than enough, and I haven’t actually looked very hard, didn’t need to.
How hard have you looked, or avoided looking?
Mr. Dutchman, respectfully, just bugger off. You should recognize that this fight will not be won unless every nook and cranny of the legal and constitutional issues surrounding this particular fight on this particular lawfare battlefield are being researched by competent legal talent; and are then being collected, itemized, and stored in a centralized, easily-referenced Internet location.
This centralized collection of legally competent information and analysis must be available for quick reference by those of us who have no qualms about debating the legal and constitutional issues with those TDS sufferers among our family, friends, relatives, and work colleagues — people who seem nice enough most of the time, but who would throw all of us into the Gulag for supporting Donald Trump and his policies if given half a chance.
It is.
It’s here.
It’s better than anyone else puts out.
Who the heck do you expect to produce your perfect fantasy manifesto for easy deprogramming?
And who the hell do you think you are to tell long time Treepers in great standing to bugger off?
You do know that’s how folks disappear themselves from here, right?
Sundance shining sunlight and scattering the cockroaches.
I’m guessing Lisa Monaco has a bad case of indigestion right about now.
She should first to test out the gallows pole. Lots of popcorn for everyone
John Brennan goes first.
The media has been captured and suborned for decades now, they are essential service now to the Destroy America movement. They still tenuously hold the very last shred of legitimacy remaining in the entire globalist construct, only just barely surviving on the last few million dupes who still cannot trust their own eyes and souls for the Truth. They are playing the shell game with no pea.
I would love to know what percentage of CIA recruits end up in high media positions.
I would not find it at all surprising that that is indeed the actual entry level position.
In the past, the CIA has recruited magicians to train them in sleight of hand. I’m not aware of any magicians placed by them. It may or may not be the other way around. My opinion only.
— Donald J. Trump April 28, 2023
Soros captured them with cold, hard cash.
Yet another bad investment. MSM and Big Tech each lost $1 billion in 2022, and on coarse to lose at least that much in 2023.
Because they are LOSING “market share” as millions are “cutting the cord” and sending their “clicks” elsewhere.
“And WHERE are they going? MAGA MEDIA which of coarse is NOT Faux news.
CTH, TGP and Bannons war room are getting more daily views, than all cable news shows, combined.
Tucker got over 100 million views, and that doesn’t count those who watched his two brief twitter vids, thru a venue other than twitter.
WE are winning the media war, which is the propoganda war, which is THE main front. EVERYTHING our enemy does, is all about Public Opinion, including this absurd Indictment campaign, and they are LOSING.
Nolte: Disgraced Washington Post Loses Publisher Fred Ryan
After failing for a full decade, publisher and chief executive Fred Ryan announced Monday he is leaving the financially embattled and disgraced Washington Post.
Then, as if to prove the left corrupts absolutely everything, the 68-year-old Ryan informed Post staffers he is moving on to lead the Center on Public Civility at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation.
Yes, that’s right… The guy whose left-wing rag spent a decade smearing us as racists and Nazis will soon be in charge of Something-Something Public Civility at the Reagan Presidential Foundation.
What’s next? Eva Braun in charge of the Anti-Defamation League?
“Today, the decline in civility has become a toxic and corrosive force that threatens our social interactions and weakens the underpinnings of our democracy,” wrote the same guy who spent seven of his ten years at the Post lying about former President Trump colluding with Russia.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/06/12/nolte-disgraced-washington-post-loses-publisher-fred-ryan/
And another conservative institution becomes fully co – opted by the left.
“What’s next?”
“Resort is had to ridicule only when reason is against us.”
-–Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, 1813
Fred Ryan is a TDS denier. Make Haters Fake Again…
“Go home, we love you, you’re very special, go home in peace…”
Nasty Person Rmx
https://rumble.com/v2rb8ew-president-trump-cnn-town-hall-remix-the-remix-bros.html
“From forty years’ experience of the wretched guess-work of the newspapers of what is not done in open daylight, and of their falsehood even as to that, I rarely think them worth reading, and almost never worth notice.”
–Thomas Jefferson to James Monroe, 1816
Richard Nixon Predicted Putin and Russia (1994)
This made me laugh out loud:
First, why would President Obama write about the DPRK nuclear threat in his letter welcoming President-elect Trump to the White House?
Great question. Looks like a set-up.
The serious NK nuclear threat was practically a daily staple on the news.
How is this a national secret, then let alone now?
It should be filed under Captain Obvious.
” o ” THOUGHT that HE and His iLK Left the TRUMP ADMIN a ” THROBBING THUMB ” that Would HAVE TO BE DEALT WITH MILITARILY.
DAMN If TRUMP DID NOT ” ICE ” That Problem by EARNING MUTUAL RESPECT From ” Little Rocket Man “
“Here, attack the Norks!” Unspoken: “Ignore Ukraine.”
It must have been a profound disappointment to the women who ran Obama’s presidency. And I’m not talking about Manchelle.
TALKING About This One ?
>>> CHECK OUT HER DAD’s CREDS ! ( James E. Bowman; a Pathologist Researching DNA …)?quality=90&strip=all&w=1200
Ol’ Bat Face Val.
Actually, the Obama letter was a set up. Everything was trying to move us to war with N. Korea, and that was a lame attempt to anchor Trump in the Neocon world of starting wars everywhere.
Never once occurred to O that trump would be a peace maker, unlike the Nobel Peace Prize recipent.
I finally remembered what this reminds me of ….. Susan Rice’s memo! https://nypost.com/2020/05/20/susan-rices-now-infamous-memo-was-blatant-bid-to-cover-obamas-butt/
“Can you see the way it unfolds?”
Yes, I can see the rabid leftist bureaucrats at NARA willingly participating in helping set up this entire GET TRUMP!!!! fiasco.
Hey, lets tuck a few letters into these boxes so they can be “found” later.
Who is this stupid Newsmax host? She’s awful! Let Nunes speak!
I never knew Hannity had a twin! I couldn’t take that annoying screechy voice either!
She had an intended narrative and she was going to force Nunes to stick to it! lol
Soviet apparatchiks use toe separators for struggle sessions.
NEW YORK RECYCLING PROGRAM for News Presenters…
Pretty sure she took the “fake news media” comment/categorization personally (and/or on behalf of her show), which is an interesting tell in itself.
funny to see newsmax still follows the idiocracy news channel cleavage model… so glad i quit watching that tv news crap when i did.
thank you sundance and others for ‘taking some for the team’ to watch it and report back from the propaganda lines
I see this woman also has a beauty products line. lol The sign of a serious journalist! And she describes herself as “Mexican-American” even though she was born in Chicago.
Everything Woke Turns to Benetton
Build Diversitee Better…
Send this to the 2 idiots on MSNBC…joe and mieka????
They’ll really scream about this…maybe they will have a heart attack on camera and we can witness their last bravo!?
I saw a video on Truth Social where they were screaming “He stole Nuclear Secrets!!!!!!!” Idiots!
I wish I had some good photo-altering software. I would love to take a photo of Joe and Mika and put foam at their mouths. lol And deeply bloodshot eyes.
This is Vindman 2.0
Curious Question: A posting from a VERY smart-sounding person on this site believes that all of the documents being held by Trump are damning evidence against the coup plotters…plus crossfire hurricane unredacted docs that will put 1000+ traitors in jail (and maybe more.) The same commenter believes the DOJ wants everything back because they, themselves are implicated in serious crimes, coups, etc.
Now it sounds like this case is about something else entirely.
But, now I am not so sure that Trump really has the goods on the bad actors, as the above commenter had stated with such conviction.
??? any feedback about this?
Embrace the power of “and”.
What Sundance describes is the means to multiple ends. They use the documents as a faux cover for the raid to collect what they want to hide. Then use the pretext of the raid and the subterfuge of the syntax to push for charges and keep him on the defensive. (And that’s just a small part of everything being done.)
Never let a crisis, especially one you create yourself, go to waste.
Why don’t you just say who it is that you’re talking about?
Auwtsnae: Because.. Willie loves cheesecake. That’s why.
Satan speaks with “Such Conviction” also! Do you believe him? He sure fooled Eve!
That was a thought initially held by many. That Trump had preserved proof of their abuses and that the FIB was grabbing and disposing of them.
I doubt we will know. They aren’t telling. And Trump hasn’t either.
Except they had classified those documents up the wazzoo to protect themselves, not because there was anything needing classification. That is why Trump declassified them. The old call yourself a source and call your law breaking a method dodge. If there really aren’t any classified documents seized by the FIB, then Trump didn’t take them.
But Trump could have taken them, and the FIB/DOJ could have deep sixed them.
We have wishful thinking, that these lawbreakers will be caught and go to jail. Hasn’t happened. But there has been a lot of discussion, in the news, by major players, about these very things, so it is not just hopium.
Indeed, and the last thing they want to do is highlight the existence and content of those documents, so they will never feature in a persecution against PDJT.
We (the world really) just has to wait and see what happens, if it is the Crossfire Hurricane, and other, unredacted documents or not.
I tend to agree that those documents are part of it (the reason for the raid on Mar-A-Lag0) because before he was President he, PDJT, had a reputation for having secrets and dirt that was dug up on people for years and that was one of his strengths, knowing what other people were like behind closed doors, so think those documents, and other ones that would align with the “we got them all” statement PDJT made while in the White House are documents that would bring those deep state swamp dwellers down for good once they were hit with full sunlight; but
we really only can wait and see what happens.
“damning evidence against the coup plotters”
Trust Mueller?
Just kidding.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/fbi-found-foreign-countrys-nuclear-secrets-during-trump-mar-a-lago-search
FTA “ Inside sources have revealed more of what the FBI found at former President Donald Trump’s resort in Mar-a-Lago, including highly classified material surrounding a foreign country’s nuclear capabilities and military defenses. The documents, in Trump’s possession for more than 18 months after he left the White House, were so top secret that “many se nior national security officials are kept in the dark about them,” according to The Washington Post, who first reported on the nuclear documents Tuesday night. The publication cited “people familiar with the search,” who spoke on the condition of anonymity. “Only the president, some members of his Cabinet or a near-Cabinet-level official could authorize other government officials to know details of these special-access programs,” the source said, revealing that special clearances are required to obtain such documents, and “not just top-secret clearance.” Which foreign government’s nuclear secrets may have been exposed is unclear, and the source did not provide details surrounding where in Mar-a-Lago it was found, but U.S. intelligence officials are now scrambling with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence “conducting a risk assessment” to determine the damage done by the removal of such classified material. After a previous report by The Post suggesting the FBI was searching for nuclear weapons-related material, Trump replied on social media: “Nuclear weapons issue is a Hoax, just like Russia.”
Sundance wot??? Are you saying those 2 inconsequential letters are the “nuclear secrets”, “nuclear weapons-related material” that were so top secret “that many senior national security officials are kept in the dark about them,”? You’re joking right? If not we’ve been punked, played for fools by the DOJ/FBI!!!
Keep in mind, they like to play a lot of semantic games. The letters as Sundance describes can be technically classified as “foreign”, “nuclear”, etc.
In many cases, it’s not about what they’ve said – it’s understanding what they didn’t say as well.
It’s how they can tell us “inflation is down under Biden”… while it is technically true, we all know that’s basically BS – prices are still going higher due to “his” policies. Yes, the rate of change is getting smaller, but it’s starting from a much larger base. Price increases can still be the same or higher as in the past, but it calculates at a lower percent increase. Etc.
It’s still shocking in some ways that something that cost $1 a couple of years ago, now costs $2.50. But, I digress…
C’mon man, it’s more of the same sophmoronic hyperbole! Remember when Wray referred to matches as potentially combustible material or some such nonsense?
Their MOA is to overdramatize the minutia and completely obscure the important things.
Agree totally but I was also being sarcastic!
Very few things that aren’t “potentially combustible” ..IIRC Ceramic is the only thing that won’t combust when exposed to burning thermite.
That article is from September 2022. Very out-of-date.
So what? It highlights what the corrupt leftist govt run propagandist msm was and has been reporting/accusing President Trump of having at Mara a Lago “Nuclear Secrets/Documents”! I was giving context to what Sundance just explained. It’s laughable that those 2 letters were basis of those leaked claims by “people familiar with the search,” who spoke on the condition of anonymity” that President Trump had “nuclear weapons-related material”! Understand now?
I agree, bubby. The article clearly shows just how they layed on the B.S. and this was exactly what Mika and Joe were amplifying, when they called for PDJT to be tried for treason.
It SOUNDS SO OMINOUS.
Thank you, Sundance, for the time you devote to educating us, sharing what’s really true, and explaining why we are where we are.
Conservative news pundits and talk radio hosts surely know as much as I do, so why do they keep their audience ill informed?
Because they are bought.
I read Trump refused to give up something he was asked to give to the government. Was that something the letters? Does he have to give up personal letters?
Watch the Robert Barnes interview video Seneca the Elder posted just below.
How do you present to a jury, or even a grand jury for that matter, “evidence” of a crime, if they are not allowed to see it?
How do you, as a juror, indict or ultimately convict someone of a crime if the evidence of that alleged crime is deemed too sensitive to allow you to view it?
Are you supposed to just accept the testimony of someone authorized to view it who claims to have viewed it?
The Democommunists are virtuous and as pure as the driven snow. Joe Biden says his proudest moment of Obama’s presidency was ‘not one whisper of scandal’. They are not capable of lies and deceit. They have conquered human nature and original sin.
Actually, yes. In theory in an espionage act case, the jury might well be presented with evidence the defendant had “mishandled classified information” along with a statement signed by the defendant affirming they understood the rules on handling classified info, that intent was not an element of the crime, etc.
And yet never see the actual classified info.
I believe most such cases are plea bargained, as a succesful prosecution is a,”slam dunk”.
I doubt there has ever been such a case, where there was any question the material WAS Classified, nor whether the defendant, as POTUS had plenary power to declassify by word or act.
This charade is designed to suck up the oxygen as they prep for the finale–J6 indictments for insurrection and such.
That’s when they’re going for all the marbles. His VP is out there prepping the field already.
This is a distraction.
That case is just as without merit, and despite them getting Rhodes for “seditious conspiracy” as acts of violence or inciting others to acts of violence are THE essential elements of the crime, I do not believe that case, even in DC, is any more aiming for a conviction, than the others.
Its about headlines, that is all.
And the simple counter-narrative is ;
“WHAT part of “Peacable make your voices heard” do you NOT understand?”
“National Security”?
In a Pig’s Eye.
We have no national security. Just look at our southern border being invaded by millions of nation invaders. We have less national security than every other country on Earth even though we spend by far the most on our military.
Green card army?
“Immigrants w/ no ties to the US or the ability vote or have their families vote, makes it much easier for the DC war machine to deploy our military to pointless, endless wars.”
US military offers legal migrants path to citizenship amid recruiting shortfall
twitter.com/joekent16jan19/status/1668080462739443712
Someone needs to send this video to President Trump’s legal team.
Robert Barnes absolutely destroys the case against PT in this video.
PT should hire Barnes, he seems to be the only attorney who truly gets it.
https://www.thenewneo.com/2023/06/12/robert-barnes-on-the-trump-indictment/
I’m about 14 minutes into that video and thoroughly enjoying it. I hope everyone else watches/listens too.
Yep. It’s good
Paul sperry saying the new team is ready for the dismissal requests. This is covered by Barnes too
That was beyond excellent
Thanks for posting Seneca
Jack Smith ought to be laughed out of the US and go back home to whatever foreign shores he now lives.
I cannot believe that these all-so-serious people are this stupid……….ridiculously mundane and transparently pitiful.
When I read the indictment, it sounded so weighty and deadly. It turns out it is bunch of hot air.
Not stupid, Belle. Afraid, very afraid. Lashing out anyway they can and hope it sticks.
You are right. So desperate and afraid. But it is so laughable because they are trying to attack an innocent man.
As he has been all along.
As THEY have been all along!
Like whack-a-mole played with a wet noodle.
Well, tricky nicky bought it all – hook , line, and sinker and it’s on video. So did Bari Weiss and her Free Press substack article.
https://rumble.com/v2ttzua-neocon-nikki-haley-hits-trump-over-sham-indictment-incredibly-reckless-with.html
Apparently, SC only has RINOs. Haley, Graham, Scott, Gowdy…
True.
Must be something in the water or “faulty” voting machines, er counting, or whatever.
Truth be told, libertarians can’t win elections unless they infiltrate one party or the other & they’ve infiltrated both.
Their ideology took over the republican’t party decades ago. It’s where the “any willing worker from anywhere” platform originated.
If you mean to be criticize Libertarians, I’m in full agreement with you, SM.
Gotta buck the trend, I guess…I agree with much of what the libertarians are for, seeing it fall exactly with our own proud “we just want to be left alone…so why don’t YOU leave US alone?” tradition. I couldn’t care less what people do in their own time, but not when it affects our great country (which puts their “open borders” policy out — as it is prob the only libertarian policy that does NOT fit within our own tradition of individualism-not- collectivism and “we decide, not the government.”
They’re transparent frauds that wrap themselves in the constitution & whine about gubmint spending while they take full advantage of a taxpayer subsidized workforce for personal profit.
I couldn’t possibly criticize transparent frauds that wrap themselves in the constitution & whine about gubmint spending while they take full advantage of a taxpayer subsidized workforce for personal profit.
Ooops… I think I told you how I really feel!
And they all look like they could be part of the local petting zoo
She wet herself, twisted her panties & put her finger in the air 1st.
We always knew it was the young, brown females job to stomp Trump with her stilettos hoping he’d bleed out or punch back at the poor waif. The racist, misogynist charge might stick after the 1M time that they fling it at him.
We’re all smart enough (old enough?) to understand what “I’m rubber and you’re glue—” means.
Her moral superiority complex wouldn’t be amusing under any circumstances but she’s such a transparent, pandering fraud.
Utterly revolting.
Nikki wants the presidency and knows that people don’t want her, not that it’s any excuse for joining the enemy. And Bari Weiss is one of those good-time moralists– “Oh, this is a good time to be moral” (just like when she one day decided the NYT was too “liberal” — hahaha, good word choice — for her, after working with them and putting up with their lies for years. )
And she’s not quite bright enough to realize that when you agree with arresting someone for what is routine… on the basis of a statute that has never before been used for that purpose…particularly when it is those in your political party doing the dirty political tricks during campaign season while their own candidates/people blatantly do favors based on personal contributions with no recourse at all — you’re kinda giving away how immoral you actually are.
No, he should be indicted on crimes, including wrongful prosecution. Just to name one of many charges.
Look back at the impeachments. They were ridiculous also. One impeachment was because Trump disagreed with the State Department clowns. They can’t even come up with good lies.
They’re re-running their own “Russian spy” allegations. No pride, these people.