The J6 Committee has announced they have found President Trump guilty of four counts of campaigning against their Democrat candidates and attempting to disrupt the DC system of governing and financial graft. The committee formally announced their intent today for political referrals to the Biden-Obama justice department.
In addition to holding other scandalous political conversations, President Trump is accused of: (1) “aiding and comforting” disgruntled voters; (2) obstructing Congress’ Jan. 6 joint session by holding a political rally in DC; (3) conspiring with some unknown entity to make false claims to the bureaucrats in the National Archives about his private papers; and ultimately, (4) conspiring to defraud the United States and deprive Washington DC of its business model.
The J6 Committee has released a 160-page “executive summary” of a report they will release soon [READ HERE], and will now refer President Trump to Lisa Monaco, Deputy Attorney General and former White House counsel for President Obama, to be prosecuted in Washington DC for heinous crimes and insurrection.
The goal is to fulfill President Obama’s former campaign manager David Plouffe’s promise to destroy President Trump and block him from holding office again.
Washington DC – […] The panel has long contended Trump broke the law. But its new report — which the committee voted to release but has yet to become public — is expected to add vivid new details of that effort, particularly about the cast of enablers who facilitated Trump’s gambit, from Republican members of Congress to a team of lawyers pushing fringe legal theories to shadowy operatives awash in conspiracies. The panel also released the 160-page executive summary of its report, capturing the contours of its case against Turmp.
“Faith in our system is the foundation of American democracy. If the faith is broken, so is our democracy,” said select panel chair Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.). “Donald Trump broke that faith. He lost the 2020 election and knew it, but he chose to try to stay in office through a multi-part scheme.”
“This can never happen again,” Thompson added.
The recommended referral for insurrection mentions U.S. District Court Judge Amit Mehta’s ruling in February, which said Trump’s language plausibly incited violence on Jan. 6 and cited the Senate’s 57 votes in last year’s impeachment trial to convict Trump on “incitement of insurrection.”
Charging decisions rest entirely with DOJ prosecutors, not Congress, but panel members have increasingly stressed the impact their transmission to the department could have on public opinion — viewing it as part of building a historical record around the attack. Special Counsel Jack Smith is currently conducting a wide-ranging investigation of Trump’s scheme to cling to power, and the select panel has also moved in parallel with DOJ’s effort to prosecute hundreds of Trump supporters who attacked the Capitol. (read more)
Everything seems to be following a flow and pattern associated with intense Democrat effort to retain their ‘fundamental change‘ objective.
If the sequencing is maintained, Hunter Biden will likely be charged with some low-level tax crime, right before President Trump is charged with attempting to destroy the universe. At this point the clown show is ridiculous and absurd. Believe me, the entire electorate can see it…. Not just MAGA supporters.
The more they do this, the more I appreciate the Rosetta Stone that President Donald J Trump represents.
Steadfast!
Part 1 of 2
Brunson v. Alma S. Adams; et al.,
(Biden, Harris, Pence & 385 Members of Congress)
Currently, there are two lawsuits identical to each other.
The first One, filed by Loy Brunson is still held up in the Utah Federal Court.
The second one, filed by Raland J. Brunson has made it to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS),
Docket #22-380, where 9 Justices in conference will vote (only 4 needed) to move to a hearing.
THE LAWSUIT
Both lawsuits include defendants Pres. Biden, Harris, former V.P. Pence and 385 members of congress for breaking their oath of office by voting AGAINST the proposition (that came from members of congress) to investigate the claims that there were enemies of the constitution who successfully rigged the election.
BOTH LAWSUITS ARE ABOUT THE DEFENDANTS BREAKING THEIR OATH OF OFFICE
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic…”
THE QUESTION
How can you support, and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign, and domestic? Answer: You investigate. If there are claims that there is a threat, even if you don’t believe there is a threat, you investigate. How else can you determine if there is a threat unless you investigate? You can’t. Were their claims of a threat to the Constitution? Yes. Where did these serious claims come from? 100 members of Congress. What was the threat? That there were enemies of the Constitution who successfully rigged the 2020 election. Is this lawsuit about a rigged election? No, it’s about the members of Congress who voted AGAINST the investigation, thereby thwarting the investigation. Was this a clear violation of their oath? YES.
THE RELIEF THAT LOY AND RALAND ARE SEEKING
That defendants be permanantly removed from office, and not allowed to hold a public office again.
https://ralandbrunson.com/History/History.html
This lawsuit will not be heard by the Supreme Court, and the court’s response in fact indicates that.
….the court’s response in fact indicates that.
====================
And that response was what?
It is on the Supreme Court’s docket to be decided if they will take it up. It will need 4 justices to agree to hear the lawsuit. That decision will be on Jan. 6th, 2023.
You mean four. We are not in a position to judge. It’s up to SCOTUS.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/bravo-tucker-carlson-fox-news-host-invite-kari-lake-discuss-shocking-election-day-fraud-historic-lawsuit-katie-hobbs-maricopa-county-video/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/breaking-mohave-county-arizona-voters-file-lawsuit-katie-hobbs-maricopa-county-officials-claim-fraudulent-midterm-election-dienfranchized-voters/
That’s not true.
The Supreme Court has scheduled a meeting on January 6, 2023 to consider and/or they could decide earlier if they choose.
If the Supreme Court will not hear this lawsuit and uphold the constitution they will expose themselves to be as corrupt as the government. This is their last opportunity to prove they are devoted to either uphold the law or to further political interests.
So how do you know that? What do you know that we haven’t heard?
Nobody would have shown up to the Jan 6th event – If the 2020 elections had been properly investigated….We’re still waiting for that to happen!
Well, if the Supreme Court does take it up, an does rule in favor of the filers, then the Supreme Court usurps the role of the Legislative body and becomes no better than the Supreme Court justices of Brazil which apparently is the real body that decides who gets to be the frontman for running the government in Brazil;
personally don’t think that our Supreme Court should lower themselves to that.
The Brunson brothers are playing a game where the theme is ‘be careful for what you wish for, you just might get it’.
No, this is not usurping the role of the “Legislative body”. Here’s an explanation I found: “Their case hinges on constitutional amendment violations of the right to due process. When an election has concerns of fraud, constitution allows for a 10 day investigation to look at the potential fraud questions and determine if fraud did or did not occur. This case is NOT one of election fraud, it is about congress and the senate NOT doing their oath of office and violating Amendment I to the constitution, Article VI of the constitution, the 14th Amendment of the constitution, section 3, the 5th and the 9th Amendment of the constitution, as well as a couple of Utah State Constitution articles. ” https://docbrown77.substack.com/p/interesting-scotus-case-hit-the-docket
Bessie, you are right. The Supreme Court should not lower themselves to playing politics. Indeed, they are not. The reason the Court is going into conference on this case on Jan 6, 2023 is because they are considering ruling on a matter of law, not politics, which is their proper function in our system. If it were about politics only this case would never have been placed under consideration for conference.
Let’s hope that’s what they do. Fingers crossed, prayers up.
SCOTUS historically has functioned as a check on other governmental bodies, as final arbiter of the COTUS. However, they are not a law enforcement body. That’s up to the state and federal AG’s and their respective enforcement organizations. Additionally, historically legislatures take action against their own membership if determined to have not discharged their job in accordance with their oath.
However, in today’s social and political environment, anything is possible. We’ve seen ample examples if only examining the time of PDJT’s administration and subsequent. If the Republic survives, IMO historians will study this era as one of great important to the nation. We’re living it.
WOOHOO
TRUMP WON!!!!!!!
Roger that!
Maxine Waters is asking how you got such a clear photo of our astronaut on Mars.
And AOC is asking when did we land on the sun?
That was Sheila Jackson Lee.
How does one get past the Firmament to reach the moon?
And how high was the Tower of Babel? Wouldn’t think higher than the Moon or even the stratosphere. Does God not care anymore?
Isn’t the moon within the Firmament?
If not, then blasting through the atmosphere using a rocket seems to work.
Firmament no longer exists. Great Flood is when that gave way. The Van Allen belts are what should’ve nuked their innards from the radiation. Moon landing was as real as Biden winning in 2020.
Moon is closer and within the firmament!
Part 2 of 2
BACKGROUND
Loy, Raland, Deron and Gaynor Brunson (the brothers) witnessed the 2020 election along with claims from members of congress that the election was rigged. What got their attention was when the proposition to investigate those claims was presented to Congress and put to a vote. What came as a shock to the four brothers is when they discovered that 387 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence actually voted against the proposed investigation, thus thwarting the investigation. Whether the election was rigged or not was no longer their main concern. What now became the concern was when those members of Congress violated their sworn oath by voting to thwart the investigation.
The brothers wanted to do something about this. Their brother Deron had quite a lot of experience in the legal field, which started out when he began suing banks in an attempt to show the corruption in that part of the financial world, so he had enough knowledge to file a lawsuit against the now current 385 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris. He already had experience with the SCOTUS by bringing two petitions to them, both of which were denied, but this experience gave him enough success along the way to give him the confidence that maybe, just maybe, he might be able to do something about this thwarted investigation.
Their brother Gaynor was heavily occupied with his audio/video television business (Rock Canyon Studios) so Deron got together with his other two brothers to plan out the strategy. They decided to have their oldest brother Loy to be the name on the lawsuit, which is called a “Complaint” and because he would be on the Complaint, the Court would refer to him as the Plaintiff. The 388 people being sued will now be called Defendants. Loy filed the complaint, which eventually got stuck in the Federal Court, so they got together and decided to have their brother Raland file the identical lawsuit with his name on it, in the Utah 2nd District Court. While Loy’s lawsuit continued to be held hostage in the Federal Court, Raland’s lawsuit eventually made it to the SCOTUS. Here are the events of both lawsuits:
https://ralandbrunson.com/History/History.html
Bravo, Sir Francis, for pulling this summary together. I knew these were ongoing, making slow progress. But I’ve not seen anything other than references to them….no details. And no reporting, of course.
Thank you. All is clear
This is a GREAT interview between Brannon Howse(Lindell TV) and Loy Brunson. Quite remarkable that SCOTUS chose Jan. 6th to vote whether to have a hearing on this. They only need 4. 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼
https://frankspeech.com/video/supreme-court-asks-case-could-see-385-members-congress-removed-well-president-biden-and-vp
Oh cheers, Landslide, for that little nugget. And thank you for the link…do I sense a Divine Hand in that chosen date? One does wonder….
VP Traitor tries to present himself as a hero of the US Constitution but could not be further from the truth…….I personally see him as worse than Benedict Arnold who at least had the redeeming quality of being a hero and warrior before he turned against his country……Thomas Jefferson helped to author the US Constitution so he knew a thing or two about its intent……when alternate electors were sent to HIM as VP/President of the US Senate he chose the slate of electors that resulted in HIS election as the new POTUS……..all that was asked of VP Traitor was a 10-day delay in the certification so states in question could have time to look at their election processes……he outright LIED when he said he did NOT have that power
Jefferson knew the COTUS but he had very little to do with directly authoring the document, he was Minister to the French court during the Constitutional Convention. He corresponded with the main author, James Madison; regarding the structure and some objections to certain items.
Dems: Thanks Liz, now get the f**k out of here!
And take Adam with you.
They can open a B&B in Jackson Hole.
Trump should just say no. There have been years of prosecution, really persecution, and trying as they would they couldn’t convict on any charges. For this latest persecution, Trump should just tell them NO, I will not comply with any more time wasting witch hunts.If you want me come and get me. Let them use a swat team to bust into Trump’s residence and drag him out,or they might just get into a gunfight with the secret service.Who has more people , the corrupt 4th branch and their thugs or patriotic citizens? Lets see who blinks first
The corrupt fourth branch and their thugs. They have drones. They have nuclear weapons? You want to vaporize everyone in South Florida?
We should be demanding that Ron DeSantis protect Trump using the Florida National Guard.
DeSwampis is owned by the Globalists. Don’t think he’d do a thing to help PDJT.
There comes a time when peaceful men must stand and fight. We are at that place in history. May God help us to be strong and brave, and to fight for the future of those not yet born.
David had only 1 stone slung from a handheld slingshot. We have our prayers from our hearts knocking on Heaven’s Door. God is on the side of all who will not rest until they come to rest in Him. Those who appointed themselves judges over God’s innocents have no thread to even begin threading their needles.
22-380
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-380/243739/20221027152243533_20221027-152110-95757954-00007015.pdf
Thank you Sir Francis Bacon, funny thing is they ALL had to be served and they were, by the court. I watched the long video of Loy explaining how it all took place several weeks ago. They didn’t immediately make it public because they thought people would not take it seriously.
The new House withdraws the referral.
Well done!
The New House should not only withdraw the referral it should impeach Lisa Monaco, Garland and Wray!
Those 3 are the most dangerous, God-less and corrupt individuals right now in all of the cesspool known as DC.
They wont fund it
it will be too LATE if Turtle pushes this monster of an “omnibus bill” through before the end of the year
Ron Klain and Samantha Power are right up there.
This always cheers me up…
I keep it bookmarked & find it very therapeutic upon hearing the latest Clown World narrative! 😉
https://www.bitchute.com/video/AJrlNRFDoOCb/
If only. That was awesome and funny and oh to dream. “I have a dream….”.
I truly pray that The Good LORD smites these lying dishonest unjust pieces of trash.
Justice has already been assured, just not on our desired timeline.
It won’t necessarily be like we want it either.
Washington D.C. politicians have ruined the USA….OUR REPUBLIC!!!!
I’ve lost my optimism that dragging these creatures out into the light will make any difference.
There are too many people who choose to avert their eyes, or to deny what they can see clearly.
Unless/until HUGE numbers of people have literally nothing left to lose there will be no uprising.
Meanwhile, our nation is being dismantled and all objectors neutralized (if not destroyed).
So a partisan group of parasitic pathological liars form a committee with a verdict already decided then they twisted and turned the bill Of Rights on its head and started passing down judgement that the cronies in the justice department will use as evidence to prosecute.
In our historical past the J6 committee would be up for a hot bath in tar and a feather bed to roll in .
One is reminded of the BeeGees song, I Started a Joke:
“… oh, if I’d only seen
That the joke was on me.”
He laughs best who laughs last, Mr. Schiff.
Seems to me then that Plouffe is fair game. His kind must not rise again.
When does this nonsense ever end???
Come and get me too!!
I will be reading this report very slowly.
I beg you all to just start with page 2 and 3.
I do not need to say any more.
Who is this guy David Plouffe? he sounds like the Quintessential Expression of Evil.
He worked on Obama’s campaign
obama’s campaign manager – a real nasty piece o’ work
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Plouffe
https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/2897135.David_Plouffe
….for starters……
I’m fully expect the OBiden Regime to launch a huge distraction as the Republicans are seated in January.
They are looking for a 9/11 so Joe or who ever they plant- can gain popularity- like Bush.
Pray for our Great Nation and her people.
I don’t put it past the Dems to pull another false flag. However, the fact that the Senate is majority Dems, will negate anything the House tries to do.
Look at the photo of the Clown Commission in this article, and admire what some $25 million of our taxpayer dollars bought.
IMHO, they have a problem with ethics.
How ironic this statement: “Faith in our system is the foundation of American democracy. If the faith is broken, so is our democracy.”
We no longer have faith in any of the systems in our government because they are CORRUPT to their very core.
“Faith in our system is the foundation of American democracy. If the faith is broken, so is our democracy.”
Yep, the masters of gaslighting and propaganda, the same Alinsky Rules followers, are again doing what they do.
Time to call them out BIG-TIME.
I still choose to differentiate between the systems and processes and the corrupt humans who populate them. IMO the systems and processes our founders established are robust and wise.
The humans are the disease and we are the cure.
We have a lot of corruption of those systems and processes to repair.
Sundance: Thank you for All you do.
Unfortunately, so many people have been brainwashed by the legacy media and Big Tech to such an extent that they believe the Kangaroo Court proceedings of the Jan. 6th Committee (with an apology to kangaroos) is what due process is all about. They no longer believe that both sides of the story have to be given a fair and full hearing before a verdict is rendered. They are cool with the notion that a jury should be chosen entirely by the prosecutor and picked for their pre-existing hatred of the defendant. They think hearsay evidence and double hearsay are “proof’ that suffices to destroy a person. This Jan. 6th show trial has caused harm that will linger on long after Trump and all the members of the Committee have left the scene. They have set a precedent that due process of law, the right to confront your accusers, the right to defend yourself, the right to counsel,, the right to cross-examine and such other legal niceties no longer apply.
EXCELLENT post.
Sorry, but the only recourse Congress has against a President is impeachment and removal from office….which was tried twice and failed(once, unlawfully, when Trump was already out of office). The DOJ has no jurisdiction in the J6 referral because Trump was President on J6. SCOTUS would overturn any conviction, but it will never get that far, in my opinion.
REFERRALS are to the DoJ and are CRIMINAL charges unrelated to any impeachment proceedings
This is laughable //
Is this The Last Refuge or Babylon Bee? I have a subscription to both.
Have to wonder if SD occasionally “stealth” writes for BB. He certainly has the requisite sense of humor.
A NATIONAL STRIKE AND PROTEST targeting DOJ, FBI and the Chamber (Walmart, Target, Apple, Amazon, Nike, etc).
PEACEFUL-NON-VIOLENT-SIT INS like the Vietnam and civil rights protests.
MASSIVE!
When our leaders don’t lead it is up to us.
Wanna protest something? Occupy the Press.
They are Public Enemy #1 and they have offices everywhere.
If there had been an actual insurrection, several hundred congress critters would no longer be with us, including everyone on the J6 committee.
And even if that happened the government would not have been overthrown.
Yes, battles are rarely won with an opening shot. I’m reminded of our battle for Independence and, even after, we had to got to war again and ultimately the Treaty of Ghent was signed in an unassuming Washington residence that featured the first Oval Office. Why? The White House had been burned during the war.
Wars a long and ugly. Much death and destruction. We’ve tasted neither yet. The generations who have are mostly dead now.
Wars are fought by scared men who’d rather be somewhere else. That’s the definition of courage. We’ll see.
Once the DOJ announces its intention to prosecute President Trump on these absurd, kangaroo-court charges (themselves violations of the First Amendment), it will be time for his putative opponent, Governor DeSantis, to step up and announce that he will be supporting President Trump and will work tirelessly to see that his treasonous persecutors are removed from office and themselves prosecuted for insurrection.
I will be waiting. Will he step up and do his duty?
If he does it will be a feint.
A wonderous holiday fantasy with RSD playing Santa Claus.
It’s great that you have such a positive outlook. The reality, however, is that these crooked and evil PTB will continue their “witch hunt” tactics as long as We The People sit here silently banging out our outrage on our keyboards.
And with this corrupt government, it’s hard to do otherwise.
BTW, I’m just an old lady over the age of 70.
He won’t do anything.
Bring it on, MFers.
Cold anger.
Bwa ha ha ha! These people are a big freaking joke. They’ve got nothing and they know. All this desperation so that they can end in time before the change of hands. 2 years of nothingness. Liz Cheney should be thrown in jail, along with her cohorts. Maybe they could go to the same jail cell they put the J6ers in, perhaps?
What a farce. No prosecutor would touch these charges with a ten foot pole. This was one last gasp for attention that lacks any seriousness.
Frankly, this nonsense only makes Trump a stronger candidate. Everyone sees through the desperation.
Yes…you will have a glory seeking Michael Avenatti type take this on as prosecutor.
He…or She… will cozy up to all media involved who will love to profile their adoring family and desire for civil rights for all whether black, tranny, LbGqt or whatever less than 3% of the population minority…prosecute our Lion yes but the real emphasis will be on the personal message and leftist political agenda…….
“No reasonable prosecutor would touch these charges with a ten foot pole”
Isn’t that what Comey said about the hilldawg?
What’s the most logical timing for the DOJ to file charges. You know they will but they must have a tactical plan as to the date.
Christmas Eve or Christmas Day so they can dump on believers.
They are probably waiting on the Fauci files drop from Twitter.
They really, really do not want low information voters getting a look at whatever is in that.
The Twitter drops are escalating in terms of the impact of the information released. So “My Pronouns Are Prosecute Fauci” is guaranteed to be a doozy.
Hate to say it, but it would be best for the Truth and the future health of the American public if the dinner conversation at Christmas gatherings revolved around the jabs being bioweapons. So, those files will probably drop by Friday night. That seems to be the regular schedule.
Which puts the arrest on something like Christmas Eve, so as to prevent the red pilling and to suck all the conversational air onto the J6 BS.
But, arresting a President on Christmas Eve, well, if that doesn’t generate icy cold anger, nothing will.
It is a move of desperation.
BTW, let’s say devolution/continuity of government was put into place, and under the DOD Law of War Manual, we are now facing an occupation, and President Trump retained his authority as is Commander in Chief (never surrendered) but is not President (because those are two different functions and the Congress failed to certify him as the winner even though it should have).
Under those circumstances, if the occupation government makes a move to seize the Commander in Chief, would that be sufficient to trigger an overt or covert response by our armed forces who swore an oath to defend the country?
Not saying that would be the case, and not making any predictions at all, just asking the question.
“… if the occupation government makes a move to seize the Commander in Chief, would that be sufficient to trigger an overt or covert response by our armed forces who swore an oath to defend the country?”
Don’t count on the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Mark Milley to help President Trump. There are reports that he gave orders to the military not to follow President Trump’s orders and that he had back-channel discussions with China. President Trump reportedly called General Milley’s actions, if true, treasonous.
My bet is Christmas will go off without a hitch and I hope PDJT posts up a nice brief video from Mar a Lago reflecting the blessings bestowed upon us.
However, you do ask some good questions. Myself, I expect the military and law enforcement to carry out the orders of their unified chains of command, regardless of their oath, regardless of the law and regardless of COTUS. I’m planning on that. Until shown otherwise, they are, collectively, soldiers of the Communist.
Others will make their own assessments. God gave us free will.
“Believe me, the entire electorate can see it”
Sundance is spot on except, imo, the above statement. Through commission and ommision the true agenda is well hiden.
The ‘base’ needs retribution in the worst way against these Democrat nuts.
An insurrection is violent action
that is taken by a large group of people
against the rulers of their country,
usually in order to remove them from office.
(Collins Dictionary)
Did Trump call on Americans to turn up at the Capitol, armed to their teeth,
and call his supporters to burn down the building? He most certainly did not.
If he had followed the example of the peaceful Antifa and BLM protesters,
he would have called his followers to burn down the Capitol
and government buildings in every Democrat city across the country.
Strange there has not been a smidgen of evidence to prove this accusation against Trump.
I am more interested in what will happen on January 6th 2023 when SCOTUS takes up the Brunson vs Adams case 22-380 could they rule that the current government is a fraud? Watch the video https://www.onenewspage.com/video/20221129/15170466/BREACH-OF-NATIONAL-SECURITY-LOY-BRUNSON-SUPREME.htm
A majority of votes believe the 2020 election was fraudulent. The Communist Democrats with the RINO’s looking the other way know that they can not fabricate another 20 million votes to defeat Trump – doesn’t mean they won’t try – so they hope by indicting Trump that it will damage him enough politically to maybe tamp-down his his vote totals.
This entire effort will only make Trump stronger even if found guiltily or innocent. People love an underdog or someone who’s been unfairly treated – in Trump’s case it’s off the charts.
Link?
So now we will have to endure two full years, until the 2024 election, to more bs from the Uniparty birds.
Curious to see what President Trump’s response will be; hopefully none until we find out what the DOJ Garland has to say. If they do a perp walk pretty sure all hell will break loose.
Garland will execute whatever Obamboozler and The Wingman tell him to execute.
With a just couple of words President Trump could put the Repiblican party in disarray. 😏
One thing for certain, if they’re as true to this promise of “This can never happen again” as they have been to other such promises, President Trump has nothing to worry about.
for Pete’s sake, this is complete crap, from the first moment of the illegally-formed fake committee with no Republican-chosen member, with no legal subpoena authority, to the fake “testimony,” cherry-picked fake evidence, lack of due process, endless lies (“all the dead cops,” fire extinguishers, bear spray, etc), lack of real investigation (show all the video, show cops opening magnet doors & waving crowds in, attacking Innocent families, instigating a legal protest just a big TV Kafka show, laughing stock of Planet Earth of the Banana Republic we have become.
Then ridiculous “charges” – what, peaceful protests & speeches outside Capitol are “disrupting a proceeding?”
Why cannot Repub Congress simply resume the “investigation” on Jan 3, and give us REAL evidence? New Speaker can also choose to treat prisoners in the Capitol Dungeon humanely, and fire the foreign guards who are mistreating them.
Entire thing makes me want to vomit. Wake the Freak up, Brain Dead populace, media, and Repubs.
We DENY your premise, “Insurrection” my ASS.
Did Kinzinger cry?
Yes and he wet his pants too.
And that was before breakfast.
I keep saying, but no one listens. I think they don’t believe me. All you have to do is read history.
If you prevent Trump from running again, if you block us from having Candidate Trump in the 2024 presidential election, however you might accomplish it, you are REALLY NOT GOING TO LIKE WHO WE SEND IN NEXT.
Go ahead. Keep it up. See what happens.
Yet another narcissistic melodrama
How do you commit insurrection without organizing and executing an insurrection or without telling people to do so? Those are issues a fair justice system (we don’t have one of those) would tear apart. Despite a year-plus of investigations and hearings that over-promised and under-delivered; the lack of evidence for any of the charges being levied doesn’t matter to such as these – self-appointed judges. Jumping the shark? DOJ knows it can indict a ham sandwich and secure convictions in the DC jurisdiction. The only question left is :
Will the new special counsel wait and see if Trump wins the GOP nomination before indicting him in an attempt to destroy Republican chances in the 2024 election?
Wouldn’t even put it past them – pretty sure that’s the plan. Dogs and swines/
nichan-“Will the new special counsel wait and see if Trump wins the GOP nomination before indicting him in an attempt to destroy
Republican chances…” the Republic.______________________
They wouldn’t dare, would they?
If they did that it would ignite the tinderbox that our country is today
and there would BE no presidential election.
Regarding any indictment/arrest, all that stuff, my bet is sooner rather than later. Time isn’t on the Communist’s side and it isn’t their nature anyway. Attack. We’ve seen the evidence since the escalator. It’s been non-stop.
Please don’t insult dogs or swine!
I’ll never forget how many times so many Republicans stood up and fought these lies and fought for our country, said NO ONE.
If there was a party united in the truth and standing up for the Constitution then inroads could be made. However, they’re having sex with the enemy and can’t be bothered.
“Faith in our system is the foundation of American democracy. If the faith is broken, so is our democracy,” said select panel chair Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.).
Me thinks the “foundation” that Bennie references; “Faith in our system” is not the foundation of our Democracy/ Republic, but the Constitution serves that function. It is Congress that has violated their sacred oath to protect and defend the foundation and I don’t mean these J6 Committee clowns, but the whole of Congress. There was indeed an insurrection, but the participants were the DOJ/ FBI, along with the DNC that colluded with the social media platforms as well as the mainstream media outlets that chose to deny the public of their First Amendment rights. The political prisoners from the Jan 6 protests are not the parties that belong in jail, they are imprisoned for the savage crime of being Patriots. They are paying that price because the rest of US, including myself had not the will, “reads: balls” to say ‘no more’. Sadly the guilty parties will never be held to account, evil will prevail and most of the living Americans today will witness the death of the last bastion of freedom on the planet. A better quote from Franklin, would have been more appropriate regardless of it’s original context: “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”
I wish a pox upon these treasonous bastards. each and every one.
They should be given 100 covid shots in 100 minutes.
And may microemboli find them all. Happy Amyloidosis and Merry Christmas to them.
The J6 committee is a treasonous, fake bunch of assholes.
Truer words have not been written!
By dart gun, like they use to tranquilize animals.
I keep thinking of them in an electric car that has “issues”!
Please everyone PRAY that justice will be done as the SUPREME COURT makes their decision on Jan 6, 2023. Maybe they won’t make their decision on that date, but they’ll start . If at least 4 of them decide to proceed, then they will.
The Constitution obligates the federal government to uphold the Article IV Section 4 guarantee to the states that they shall have a republican form of government. That means that our federal government cannot instead deprive the states of republican government, but that is exactly what our Democrat-controlled House of Representatives is trying to do with this attempt to block President Trump from running for re-election.
Here is Alexander Hamilton’s definition of republicanism as stated at the New York debates on the Constitution: “The true principle of a republic is, that the people should choose whom they please to govern them. Representation is imperfect in proportion as the current of popular favor is checked.”
Citing Hamilton’s definition, SCOTUS labeled this principle as “voter sovereignty,” Powell v. McCulloch 395 U. S. 486, 541 (1973). That is the underlying principle of our republican form of government: that We The People are sovereign. In the words of Abraham Lincoln, our form of government is “of the people, by the people, and for the people.”
There are two most basic ways to prevent the people from choosing whom they please to govern them. One is to administer fake elections, as by rendering elections intentionally vulnerable to mass election fraud by such devices as mail-in elections, ballot drop-boxes, or by not requiring voter i.d., not cleaning voter rolls, or by using easily hackable/re-programmable electronic voting machines, or failing to secure the information needed to fully and transparently audit elections, or failing to perform audits when elections are questionable, or by automatically registering illegal aliens to vote when they apply for CA drivers licenses, then trusting that neither they nor anyone else will vote the ballots that are sent to them, along with the many other tricks that Democrats have been putting in place for fifty years to systematically steal more and more elections.
All of those tricks are clearly unconstitutional. Republicanism requires honest elections so anything that undermines honest elections undermines the guarantee of republican government, making it no longer a guarantee, which violates the Constitution, and since elections are all run by the states, the state governments that have imposed these unrepublican election rules and processes are all unrepublican and must be forced to reform so as to become republican or the Constitution is violated.
Trump is absolutely right when he says that these elections can all be nullified after the fact. Article IV section 4 anticipates that ridding the states of unrepublican forms of state government could well require waging war. It would be absurd to maintain that we can wage war to overthrow state governments that run phony elections, while denying that we can throw out the phony election results themselves. What is the war for, if not to throw out those whose power is based on illegitimate election results?
But running fake elections is only one way to deny the people their choice of who shall govern them. Another is to disqualify opposition candidates so that they cannot appear on the ballot, as the J6 committee is trying to do to Trump. These are the hallmarks of a “banana” republic as opposed to an actual republic: they steal elections and they weaponize the powers of government to suppress political opposition.
When it is Congress that suppresses political opposition by not letting a leading opposition candidate appear on the ballot, Congress is by that act forcing the states that run the elections to be unrepublican in form, which is the opposite of guaranteeing that they shall be republican in form. The citizens of the state are kept by their state governments from choosing who they want to choose to govern them.
The republican guarantee is the tool that the founders put in place to defend against the eruption of unrepublican government that has already stolen the last two election cycles. Conservatives need to start using it.
SCOTUS made this difficult when the Supremes themselves got confused about the implications of the fact that overthrowing unrepublican government might well require acts of war. The Court’s response was to conclude in effect that, since war is involved , they had to leave this stuff up to the political branches, since only the political branches can decide when war is needed. The courts couldn’t get involved, and so the republican guarantee was held to be “non-justiciable.”
Crazy wrong. Just because the emergence of unrepublican forms of state government might be remediable only by acts of war does not mean that they are always remediable only by acts of war.
The Supremes should have been doing what they could all along to prevent republican government from being undermined. They should have been striking down all election laws and procedures that unnecessarily open the door to vote fraud on the grounds that they undermine the guarantee of a republican form of government, and the same for any weaponization of the powers of government so that instead of pursuing equal justice the incumbents officeholders (elected and unelected) were targeting their political opposition.
There are other requirements of republicanism as well, such as the freedom of speech and association needed to advance ideas and to vie effectively for public office. These are protected independently, but the republican guarantee, the only guarantee in the entire Constitution, asserts a highest priority.
When constitutional provisions come into conflict, one must always give way to the other. What the guarantee implies is that our republican form of government itself must never be compromised, or it fails to be guaranteed. Every other Constitutional provision must give way before this one.
Look at McCain-Feingold to see how deeply compromised freedom of speech has become. “Congress shall pass no law,” has given way to endless minutiae regulating core political speech, which is supposed to be the most protected form of speech.
Look at the grounds upon which the current war against “mis-, mal- and dis-information” is being waged. It’s all national security claims, on which SCOTUS has a long history of automatically deferring to the executive on. Outside of the republican guarantee the courts will never side with free speech over the executive branch’s claims of a national security need for secrecy.
Only the republican guarantee can assert a free speech claim that must be given priority even over national security claims, as it must be given priority over every other thing.
We have a legal sword Excalibur, superior to every other sword. We have to free it from the stone where SCOTUS errantly imbedded it and start using it.
The time to choose our hill is here.
The time to opt out of somnambulism, or die in that state, taking along all future generations, is now. 🙏🏻♥️🇺🇸
This is an extremely well written explanation)
Thank you for this.
Remember !!
unfiortunately, we do
Of course the media is going to pretend that this is an unexpected and shocking turn of events even though it was a foregone conclusion from the very beginning that the Democrats would formally declare President Trump guilty.
The moment Nancy Pelosi floated the idea – The smear. Nothing was ever in doubt.
Hearings without hard evidence – though farcical was just a stumbling block easily overcome with the
a compliant media willing to treat every dud as definitive.
The Wench Who Soiled Christmas.
Let’s examine her financial portfolio— and those of her husband “The Hammer” — and see if maybe she needs just a tiny bit of being held accountable for her interesting money schemes.
We have republicans in a majority and can’t even get an investigation for her illegal investments.
It’s the culmination of a seven year campaign.