Okay, first things first. CTH will not play the pretending game or structure the discussion of the special counsel appointment through the prism of MSM references. Instead, we will stick to the facts as they are presented, explain the events as they are factually reflected within the actual documents, and avoid the pretending constructs.
DATA Links: (1) Merrick Garland DOJ Statement on Appointment of Special Counsel ~ (2) pdf of Legal Appointment ~ (3) Statement of Jack Smith upon Appointment ~ (4) Transcript of AG Merrick Garland Public Announcement.
The overarching Lawfare framework has been transparently created by President Obama’s former White House Legal Counsel and current U.S. Asst Attorney General Lisa Monaco. To wit, earlier this afternoon Joe Biden’s Attorney General, Merrick Garland, announced the appointment of DOJ Attorney Jack Smith as special counsel to investigate two specific areas:
♦ First, to investigate current republican members of congress (House and Senate), former President and current candidate Donald J Trump, former Trump administration officials, former White House staff, and other individuals, groups and organizations for their role in supporting an insurrection on January 6, 2021, against the incoming administration of President-Elect Joe Biden. In essence, the J6 investigation – with an emphasis on congress – transfers to Special Counsel Jack Smith:
The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the ongoing investigation into whether any person or entity violated the law in connection with efforts to interfere with the lawful transfer of power following the 2020 presidential election or the certification of the Electoral College vote held on or about January 6, 2021, as well as any matters that arose or might arise directly from this investigation or that are within the scope of [Special Counsel Regulations 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a)]. (pdf)
This is an extension of the January 6th Committee special investigation that transfers the committee’s investigative findings, ie phone records, text messages, transcripts, emails, prior testimony and all evidentiary records, into the newly appointed Special Counsel.
However, all prior and current DOJ prosecutions against citizen individuals will remain within the control and direction of Main Justice. This structure frees up Jack Smith to target the new republican controlled congressional members, their staff, families and/or communication network. Main Justice keeps focus on the citizen insurrectionists, Jack Smith now appointed to go after the public officials.
J6 Committee staff, committee investigators, FBI agents and DOJ lawyers will now transfer from the committee to the special counsel office. Watch. (More on why later)
♦ Second – and this is ancillary to the first priority – DAG Lisa Monaco has written, and AG Garland has appointed, Jack Smith to target Donald Trump with the same special counsel process previously used by Robert Mueller and Andrew Weissmann.
The Special Counsel is further authorized to conduct the ongoing investigation referenced and described in the United States’ Response to Motion for Judicial Oversight and Additional Relief, Donald J Trump v. United States, No. 9:22-CV-81294-AMC (S.D. Fla. Aug. 30, 2022) (ECF No. 48 at 5- 13), as well as any matters that arose or may arise directly from this investigation or that are within the scope of [Special Counsel Regulation 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a)].
The Trump Mar-a-Lago document investigation (the proverbial nothingburger – just like Trump/Russia) transfers to the Special Counsel office, along with an intended angle to look for an obstruction of justice charge (just like Mueller). This is Robert Mueller 2.0 using Special Counsel Jack Smith.
The Trump-centric part of the special counsel appointment, the part that everyone is focusing on, is ancillary to the real purpose of the appointment. However, that said, all investigative resources from Main Justice and the FBI will transfer to Jack Smith as they did when Crossfire Hurricane transferred to Robert Mueller. The investigative people will transfer along with the investigative evidence.
Duplicating history, all of the DC elements of the UniParty, both Democrats and Republicans, will sing the praises of Jack Smith as an honorable man, beyond reproach, blah, blah, blah. If you want to stop playing the pretending game, just pay attention to the people praising him, and THOSE voices are the bad guys.
As you can see from the simple (non-pretending) explanation of what is being done, the Lawfare process become clear. Everything congress now begins to question falls under the protective blanket of an “ongoing investigation,” exactly as we predicted. Plus, you get the additional Lawfare elements of congressional leadership under investigation which provides an entirely new ‘conflict of interest dynamic’ to the political equation.
Then you have the congressional representatives under investigation and search warrants on their phones, text messages, emails, etc…. AND the added benefit of using DOJ-NSD defined terms of “national security threat” (that’s why they emphasized insurrection) to gain FISA warrants on an entire incoming congressional delegation. How slick is that?
They didn’t just think this up overnight.
This is why the January 6 committee never ended. They are using J6 as a weapon against their losing the House to republicans. The Democrats are now structurally targeting Republicans with the appointment of Jack Smith. It’s actually a brilliant move. The executive is now investigating the legislative branch; the legal structure of this eliminates the separation of powers issue.
The DOJ is not investigating republicans, they are investigating defined criminals; insurrectionists that are national security threats, that happen to be republicans. See how that works?
This also explains why Nancy Pelosi did not resign from congress, but only stepped down from her leadership role. The timing of mid-November (today) gives Smith time to get all his midterm counter-offensive ducks in a row before his republican targets take office in January.
All of the congressional J6 and DOJ main justice teams will now assemble in new DC offices to set up the 2023 targeting operation. The announcement was made today, but the planning of the construct has been in place for months, contingent upon the number of actual House seats that could flip. The Lawfare design is transparent when you stop looking at the obfuscation reporting from mainstream media.
Primary goal, create enough of a legal mess as to obstruct any republican legislative effort against the Biden White House. Additionally, if Smith’s DC team can pick-off a few republican House members under charges of “supporting an insurrection“, the political power will revert back to the Democrats in office.
Jack Smith’s curriculum vitae as a lawyer experienced in international government law, think about tribunals for overthrowing government, then becomes a clarifying skillset.
Think of it like the legal ideology of the United Nations (democracy as defined by progressives) prosecuting members of the United States government for acts of rebellion under the framework of a constitutional republican form of government they abhor. That’s Jack Smith.
In addition, the same ideological Lawfare elements will be targeting the threat represented by U.S. nationalist politician Donald J Trump. It’s like The Great Reset crew inserting an operative inside a corrupt and friendly United States Dept of Justice, with the intent to remove the threat Donald J Trump represents to their interests.
On the multinational corporate side, while all this is special counsel stuff is taking place, the Wall Street billionaires and multinationals will be providing the illusion of choice for the American electorate.
Things making sense now?
(Source pdf)
It’s all right there, if we just stop pretending.
Accept things as they are, not as they are presented to be.
If you want to fight this stuff, help me….
…. Support CTH HERE
.
Our system of government only works when the majority of officials have moral integrity. It sure is a mess when almost none have any. I admit I use to have little knowledge of how easily it can be manipulated.
This was in one of my Eric Holder documents–history of a radical breaking federal laws. It shows that Jack Smith is not new to targeting conservatives.
https://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individuals/eric-holder
URGING THE IRS TO HELP BUILD CRIMINAL CASES AGAINST CONSERVATIVE GROUPS
In an October 2010 meeting that was arranged at the direction of Jack Smith, chief of the Justice Department’s Public Integrity Section, the DOJ asked IRS official Lois Lerner to help the Department build criminal cases against conservative nonprofit groups that were conducting political activity. This was part of the massive IRS political targeting scandal that began to make headlines in May 2013.
I lived in Ferguson from March 1997 until June 2022. It was a wonderful place until Holder destroyed it through the consent agreement. It is now a sad, business vacated, boarded up, rundown, lawless, dangerous place. All because of BLM, the demonization and hamstringing of the police force and the celebration of criminals. I would like Holder to revisit the result of his “social justice crusade,” and see how that worked out for everybody, including and especially those of whom he purports to be a champion.
You think he cares?
I hope that we did not lose you to another state Emily; we live in S. Co. and I don’t want smart conservatives leaving MO.
If the white middle class was destroyed in Ferguson, Holder will be very happy.
It is now a sad, business vacated, boarded up, rundown, lawless, dangerous place.
Like Ford Heights, IL and all places similar.
In other words, Emily, it is now exactly as they wished for. A lawless shithole.
Eric Holder is a RACIST!
Where are a few rogue snipers when we really need them?
You must be a mind reader. I was thinking that just a few minutes ago.
I keep calling for Carlos Hathcock USMC to set sites.
I’ve been thinking about it for years.
I’m surprised there isn’t someone out there who lost everything
and they have a box of bullets with names on each of them
Waiting for the nod.
.50 Barrett, from one mile away.
Time for Bob Lee Swagger and Peppermint to show up on the scene.
President TRUMP, please put Stanford Law School Professor Nate Persily on the stand in your defense.
“Nate Persily, the James B. McClatchy Professor of Law at Stanford Law School. Among Professor Persily’s accomplishments was serving as the Research Director for the Presidential Commission on Election Administration.”
EAC to host roundtable discussion on Election Night Reporting for the 2020 Election
MEDIA ADVISORY
October 19, 2020
https://www.eac.gov/news/2020/10/19/eac-host-roundtable-discussion-election-night-reporting-2020-election
https://www.eac.gov/events/2020/10/20/eac-roundtable-discussion-election-night-reporting-2020-election
Excerpt from the meeting minutes:
COMMISSIONER MCCORMICK:
Thank you. Professor Persily, what happens if we don’t have certified electors, say, by December 8th? I know we’re kind of jumping the shark there a little bit, but, you know, what is the process? I mean, what can voters expect if we don’t know what the results are?
MR. PERSILY:
Well, the question is whether December 8th or December 14th is the magical date here.
COMMISSIONER MCCORMICK:
Right.
MR. PERSILY:
So, let’s start with the — why you mentioned that date, which is that under the Electoral Count Act, it says that if a slate of electors has been chosen by a process in place before that date, that then that becomes the presumptive slate for the electoral college. We — the short answer is we don’t really know what will happen and the role of the State legislatures and the courts and the Governor and then ultimately, Congress. But just to put the legal machinery out there, right, in the event — there is a question as to by what date do you have to have the electors essentially vote?
That’s December 14th, right, that they have to have voted by then, the electoral slate. And then on January 6th, the — in Congress, they would open up — Vice President Pence would preside over the preceding that would open the certificates of the electoral — of the electoral slates.
Now, the question is if there is no electoral slate coming from a State, what does that mean? And that is not — that doesn’t stop the process, but it depends whether Congress itself would be adjudicating controversies over electoral slates, right? When there’s a process in the Constitution where both houses participate.
If there is — if the failure to have an electoral slate be part of the — the certificate doesn’t arrive in Congress, then there’s a question as to whether either candidate has won a majority of the electors, in which case then there’s a process in the Constitution where the House of Representatives votes by State in order to decide that.
So, you know, it’s — we’ve never tested — we’ve never sort of kicked the tires on the Electoral Count Act process, and no doubt the courts would be intimately involved both in the run-up to that in the event that we don’t have a victor, as well as afterwards if there are competing slates of electors.
I hope that answers your — I could certainly go into greater detail.
COMMISSIONER MCCORMICK:
It sounds very complicated, and I hope we don’t get there actually. We’re hoping we actually do have an answer on Election Night or shortly thereafter, so — but I — just out of curiosity because a lot of people have been asking me, you know, what happens if we don’t know? So, you know —
MR. PERSILY:
Right, and so the question is whether — so the Constitution says that each State shall in a manner determined the legislature thereof appoint a number of electors, so there’s constitutional power vested in the State legislature. However, the Electoral Count Act gives sort of presumption to slates of electors that were determined on — by that date, and then, also the certificate that is signed by the Governor is then given presumptive validity when it comes to the electoral college.
But what you ask is also suppose none of that happens, that we don’t actually have any electors coming from a State, and then that doesn’t prevent us from deciding who a President is, but then it depends on how many electors each candidate has garnered.
https://www.eac.gov/sites/default/files/2020-10/EAC102020VerbatimRoundtable.pdf
I would also ask, ‘Why would you need to attempt to amend the role of the VP in this process if he did not have the powers President TRUMP and his attorney laid out in their plan?”
The answert is simple. They had the right to do what they did and states have the right to send dueling elctors if they KNEW IN THEIR HEARTS that the governors certifications were fraudulent.
If it’s all black and white already, leave it be.
In essence, we have Governors choosing our Presidents as long as they sign off on the fraud.
Weissmann loves him. That’s really all you need to know.
Good, they can be buried together when the time comes.
He looks like a cousin to the Mr Smith in the Matrix movies. These “people” will not stop until they are stopped, which will never happen, because the swamp protects its own, because the only true focus of government is to perpetuate its existence and to keep the advantage.
Why not use their tactics ….or worse….
Why do we have to put up with this bullshyt? When do we stop being pushed around like chumps?
Looks to me like Mr. Smith is a prime candidate for rendition.
Bottom line-they dont want Pres Trump to run again -or ever.
They will use every trick in the book-legal or not legal to go after him.
Poor man.
Just a hunch, but at least 50/ 50 chance Bagpipes Barr was in on the planning of this most recent fraud by the DOJ.
I am betting closer to 100%.
There is only one way to keep Trump off the ballot. No normal criminal conviction can do it, only an impeachable offense will suffice. Insurrection is one of those offenses.
GOP congress wont impeach Biden
I think the reason is they dont want Kamala. So we are caught between a rock and a hard place.
But if something happens to Biden, who will be VP?
I am thinking Nancy Pelosi
Inevitable: Establishment Republicans Oppose Impeaching Biden
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/11/18/establishment-house-republicans-oppose-impeaching-joe-biden/
They will have to impeach her as well..as soon as she keeps the border open…which she will…
She’s illegally occupying office as it is. 169 U.S. 649
It won’t be Pelosi because she’s not speaker of the House anymore.
She is until the new Congress is seated on January 3rd.
Harris would select her replacement as VP and that nominee will need to be approved by a simple majority vote by both houses of Congress, The Speaker of the House does not automatically move up into the vacant VP slot. The most likely replacement is an individual who visted the White House a few times when Bidumb was fistbumping with the oil sheiks a few months back. Yes, the Hair Boy himself, Gavin Newsom.
Whoever might succeed to the Presidency does not make much difference – Kamala, Pelosi, or McCarthy. As Dubya admitted to Rush on his program once, there’s only so much the President can do. Translated, the President is just a figurehead for TPTB for some time now. What is more important is to get a strong individual in the office again that that actually functions for the benefit of the U.S.A. DJT comes to mind.
If the FBIe and DOJe has already denied that there WAS an insurrection, how can anyone be charged with SUPPORTING an insurrection that wasn’t?
So how can this be legally prevented? There has to be a legal way to shut this down.
Zero out DOJ funding in the upcoming CR. Shut down the government if necessary.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/11/16/democratic-strategists-launch-war-room-00065498
What if the Republicans re-open the J6 committee and demand the SC return all documents to the committee so they can resume their “investigation”?
You think Kevin McCarthy isn’t in on this too? Of course he is.
FILTHY LIBERAL Has this Jerk been confirmed by the Senate? If not, he is Fruit of the Poisonous Tree. It’s the same unconstitutional appointment like that SOB MOOLER.
We need a new party now that Romney’s Fat Niece got reinstated. The Jug Eared Kenyan & Mitch McConnell have done more Damage to America than ANY of it’s historical Foes.
Current regulations do not require Senate confirmation for a Special Counsel. They are temporary assistants working entirely under the Attorney General, and only the AG can fire them, and then only for cause.
I agree with those suggesting the only power Congress currently has over an SC is through restricting DOJ funds. They would have to pass a new law specifying other limits.
FJB would have to sign that law.
Failure to use the “Power of the Purse” to defund it will prove that they new leadership in the House is in on it!
Shut the government down if needed to stop it ALL!
You can see why Russia ocassionally has a key person trip and fall, bump their head, and pass away. Very efficient.
Yes but not even hammers seem to be lethal with certain pwople in the US.
The foolish Republicans re-elected McConnell.Do you really think they have the gonads to buck this nonsense? I don’t think so.
We have quite a few too many swamp dwellers in Congress.
We are on our own.
How are we going to fight “this stuff”? How did we fight it last time? Just wondering.
the way to fight this is like Brazil is
The last time the constitutionality of having and using independent counsels was challenged was Morrison v Olson (1988). That law has since expired, but at the time it was affirmed by the Supremes. Rehnquist wrote the opinion. Scalia was the sole dissenter. Since 1999 Congress has accepted special/independent counsels as being DOJ temp employees.
As things stand currently, Congress would have to pass a new law limiting the AG’s power to appoint, and that law would have to survive challenges, which would take years.
I’m afraid the ex-president’s gonna have to fight “this stuff” with his own team of hired guns and a defense fund.
Well, I forgot who said it but in general “The West” and America have said to be admirers of the Democracy in Ukraine.
The kind of democracy that bans, disbands and sells all assets of their biggest political opposition party.
The Ukrainian example of democracy itself that came to be in power with somewhat of a coup in 2014.
If Zelensky is the role model of Joe Biden then banning all the opposition (anybody with a different opinion than the party line) would not be far off.
Just to note that model is NOT a “precious Democracy”.. That – ladies and gentleman – is mighty close to a Tyrany.
Also democracy does not need to be cradled like a vulnerable baby like Chuck Schumer was trying to sell.
It (along with the truth) can endure and stand on its own feet. Like a (well designed) airplane in A storm it is designed to right itself. Checks and balances.
It is the LIES that need to be continually nurtured and remembered. One day the house of cards and lies is going to collapse. That is what they are afraid off. I am sure until that day the grift will continue.
The DOJ is not investigating republicans, they are investigating defined criminals; insurrectionists that are national security threats, that happen to be republicans.
They are going to take out the newly elected Rs – and any other MAGA Rs they haven’t gone after already — to take back the House.
Second – and this is ancillary to the first priority – DAG Lisa Monaco has written, and AG Garland has appointed, Jack Smith to target Donald Trump
If they succeed in taking back the house, and if 45 ran and won, they would impeach, remove and probably jail him for treason.
Monkey says odd incoming at Gitmo.
Jack Smith looks like a nasty, cs-ing, SOB, pr*ck. A true believer,sociopathic Gestapo agent who enjoys torturing his victims for the cause of the Party. And who vigorously pursues them to the death.
B@st@rds like this can be dealt with one -and only one- way.
Apologies for the not-so deleted expletives. Will try harder next time.
But there’s still only one way to deal with assassins like Smith.
LOL – Haven’t seen many photos of prosecutors, have you?
They generally try to adopt a “They’ll never get away from me!” facial expression.
It’s the opposite with Congress candidates. They all try to project a “You can trust me. I’m your pal.” look.
Illustrations appropriate to each narrative.
Believe me.
He loves the hate more than life itself.
He loves your view of Jack Smith.
I have just one question? Why was there no special counsel created to investigate Hillary Clinton’s illegal server that held classified information?
Garland acknowledged today that pursuing investigations against an active presidential candidate could open the DOJ up to accusations of politicization and that appointing the special counsel would be the prudent approach.
Funny that wasn’t the case with Clinton, and the evidence was there that she broke the law.
I don’t know how you would do this, but President Trump should find some way to file a lawsuit to stop this based on the Clinton precedent of no special counsel.
The law is supposed to be applied fairly and equally.
why?
we have a one party state
its pretty obvious
The Insurrectionists are in charge and projecting all this on opposition same act and it workes every time.
ilDonaldoTrumpo
@ilDonaldoTrumpo
7h
·
MERRICK GARLAND CAN STICK THAT SPECIAL COUNSEL UP HIS ASS!!! #TeflonDon
And of course you have MTG running to Steve Bannon tonight to throw herself at the cult to defend McCarthy in all of this tonight.
It’s the second time she’s had to flash her fake conservative badge this week to attempt to save the party’s face and McCarthy to the fan base.
Their gonna have to find a new girl to push controlled opposition messaging before she becomes obvious. Even Pavlov’s well trained dogs cant ignore the stench of the reality creeping in.
It’s too bad she’s fallen for the empty promise of “I’ll pay you tuesday for a hamburger today”.
It is becoming more and more difficult to love America when it has the very lowest of people in the very highest of positions of power.
Well this explains Pelosi’s obscure comment from a few days ago…
“In the next Congress, House Democrats will continue to play a leading role in supporting President Biden’s agenda—with strong leverage over a scant Republican majority,” Pelosi said.
You might think this opening Tucker Carlson speech is off-topic for this New Investigation of Trump or our response to the Stolen Midterm Elections – but it isn’t.
Now that it seems the majority of Trump Voters can see + admit — our Elections + Government + Institutions are — corrupt down to the marrow of their bones + since they are supporting the Great Reset — this is ———- Deadly Serious…
But many Trump Voters who weren’t convinced how corrupt things are until this latest Election Theft —– are deeply dismayed + feel ——- hopeless.
Things are very, very bad – but just look at how the Left has been VERY EFFECTIVE even though they are in the minority + have really terrible ideas…
We are in the majority of the population + our ideas are far more Truthful + far more Useful to the population as a whole.
If we cannot organize + marshal our strengths —- we deserve what we get — which in this era will be — the loss of all our rights + ultimately — Death…
What % of the population does Antifa represent?
How effective are they when they want to be?
Every new stunt this Garland pulls makes me extremely glad he never made it onto the Supreme Court, and he will go down in history as a mean, spiteful petty old man and not one good thing he may have ever done in his life will ever be remembered. That will be Garland’s legacy.
The only thing Garland “pulls” is his wife’s undergarments out of the washing machine. Merrick is told what to do, and when to do it.
It is nonsensical to say that “for the Executive to be investigating Members of Congress” is not a blatant “separation of powers” issue – likewise trying to bring criminal charges against a President or Former President for the “mishandling” of classified information which he, above all other persons on earth, is uniquely privileged to see … and to declassify.
The Legislative and Judicial branches cannot question nor “call on the carpet” the Executive to give account to the performance of his duties as the Branch. Ditto: Congress can’t call up the Supreme Court. And the Court cannot order Members nor Presidents to appear. That’s how it all works.
You can be sure that Mitch McConnell and his 18 Senator stooges he controls are all in on supporting this travesty. That included Lindsey Graham. Plus Kevin (Uniparty) McCarthy the new Speaker as well.
Hit it, folks.
That poll is going to be gamed by establishment. It will turn out a big no. Watch.
Just saw a headline that McCarthy says no funding for special counsel. I imagine they’ll come up with the funds from somewhere.
Given all today’s world “When the Man Comes Around” – is all I can say at this point. Anything else would earn me a visit.
Great video for this ominous song posted by HonkyTonkMan2.
You-Toob this string directly: in lower all case johnny cash (when the man comes around)
Or if this link:
Enjoy ‘ol gravel voice when he was still young!
JOHNNY CASH
The Man Comes Around Lyrics
And I heard as it were the noise of thunder
One of the four beasts saying, “Come and see”,
And I saw and behold a white horse
There’s a man going around taking names
And he decides who to free and who to blame
Everybody won’t be treated all the same
There will be a golden ladder reaching down
When the man comes around
The hairs on your arm will stand up
At the terror in each sip and in each sup
Will you partake of that last offered cup
Or disappear into the potter’s ground?
When the man comes around
Hear the trumpets, hear the pipers
One hundred million angels singing
Multitudes are marching to the big kettledrum
Voices calling, voices crying
Some are born and some are dying
It’s Alpha and Omega’s kingdom come
And the whirlwind is in the thorn trees
The virgins are all trimming their wicks
The whirlwind is in the thorn trees
It’s hard for thee to kick against the pricks
Till Armageddon, no shalam, no shalom
Then the father hen will call his chicken’s home
The wise man will bow down before the throne
And at his feet they will cast their golden crowns
When the man comes around
Whoever is unjust let him be unjust still
Whoever is righteous let him be righteous still
Whoever is filthy let him be filthy still
Listen to the words long written down
When the man comes around
Hear the trumpets, hear the pipers
One hundred million angels singing
Multitudes are marching to the big kettledrum
Voices calling, voices crying
Some are born and some are dying
It’s Alpha and Omega’s kingdom come
And the whirlwind is in the thorn trees
The virgins are all trimming their wicks
The whirlwind is in the thorn trees
It’s hard for thee to kick against the pricks
In measured hundred weight and penny pound
When the man comes around
And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts
And I looked and behold, a pale horse
And his name that sat on it was Death
And Hell followed with him
Honest question: what exactly does the DOJ do?
mr. piddles: Due to the sensitivity of the matter, which is also the subject of an ongoing investigation, and to protect sources and methods, not to mention, national security, I’m afraid I cannot answer your question.
That said, I am pleased to inform you that the DOJ is diverse, inclusive and equitable.
Well, can I at least talk to somebody familiar with the matter but not authorized to speak?
…. with the intent to remove the threat Donald J Trump represents to their interests.
The threat that needs removing is Jack Smith.
It’s impossible to play with these people. What say we just tell them we aren’t interested.
DOJ FY2024 budget: $0
FBI FY2024 budget: $0
And no back pay.
Oh and release every email, text, memo, and every unredacted word of testimony from the fake impeachment sagas.
Burn them down.
It’s not D vs. R. It’s the Uniparty vs. the Citizens of the USA.
This is correct. I speak this when trying to talk to the libtards.
patriots v. communism/fascism
even if you choose to go full security to fend off the Democratic Communist DOJ, they will use that as proof of obstruction of justice. The continuing theme is that if you try to foil the government in any way, you are obstructing justice. As if anything the government wants to pry into should be allowed by default, otherwise you have to prove to corrupt democrat communist hack lawyer judges that you are really innocent, in violation of the very founding of the American Experiment in the presumption of innocence.
I donated.
I feel like this is the only place I am hearing the truth.
Needs to stay that way.
Me too although it’s Saturday.
Am I in moderation?
No…
I’ve honestly lost all hope for our country….What can I do Sundance? I too went to the Jan 6th event & the ONLY thing that makes any sense based on what I witnessed- The breach of our Capital building was simply ALLOWED to happen- no one would have shown up that day if the 2020 election had been properly investigated….we’re still waiting for that to happen…The Republicans have lost their will to fight back – all words – no action… . I’m more upset w/them than almost anything else….we Truly have a uni-party…Lord knows I miss the world I grew up in…So depressed at this time!
Pray
Merrick Garland is the figure head and I would bet there is some form of communication with Eric Holder and his female wingwoman during Fast and Furious Ms Gupta (Radical Indian) and the other 15 top employees at the department of injustice.
When the Mar A Lago raid happened Merrick Garland stood in front of the camera looking like he was being forced to give by terrorists
Fat boy chimes in.. https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/bill-barr-implies-president-trump-will-be-indicted/
I pray his cholesterol will solidify quickly.
The fact they picked Jack smith proves he’ll be indicted. Everyone can see that.
So the “non pretending” reality is a deliberate, politically motivated, Federally armed and enforced, legally corrupt, blatant Conspiracy by the Executive Branch of the Federal Government to target, harass, and ultimately eliminate, sitting members of the US House of Representatives, the United Stares Senate, and the former, (and current Candidate) President of the United States of America.
This isn’t Fascist like.
This isn’t Communist like.
This is both.
IT IS BOTH.
There is no legal precedent for this within the History of the United States of America.
Can we call this an attempt to overthrow the Democratic Republic now? If no, Why not?
Treason is its name
Treason is their game.
“none dare call it treason” is here.
Anastasia Lin writes about China in Friday’s Wall Street Journal: “…Laws are applied selectively, courtroom verdicts are dictated by party fiat, and metes out extralegal punishment. In the absence of due process, doing the right thing is imprudent.”
She could have included the USA in her description of a communist nation. In America if you are a democrat all evil is covered up. If you do not belong to the democrat/communist party, crimes are manufactured against you and extralegal punishment meted out.
Well, hunting season is upon us, they can be hunted too.
Unfortunately, what you propose may be the only way to take back our country and our freedom. The founding fathers understood this. When there is no personal risk to the criminals who persecute you, the persecution will continue. All the rhetoric and logical argument in the world will not free you from their talons. When their corrupt actions bring grave risk to their own door, behaviors change. Years ago, this was common sense and well understood by everyone. Today, the corrupt feel insulated from consequences.