Pennsylvania Senate Candidate Kathy Barnette appeared on Fox News Sunday with Shannon Bream to answer questions about her prior positions, statements and current candidacy. Barnette has climbed in the polls and is in a tight race for the PA senate seat.
There has been an onslaught of criticism and critique in opposition to Kathy Barnette. Many political followers are concerned she might win the primary but then get crushed in the general election due to inflammatory statements in her past. This interview was a great opportunity for her to calm the nerves of republican primary voters and instill confidence. Unfortunately, Barnette did not do well in this interview. WATCH:
Shannon Bream was fair and gave Barnette plenty of time to explain her positions. Pennsylvania voters will need to make their own decisions. Trust your instincts; if you sense sketchy, it is likely because sketchy exists.
The sketchy I sense most is that FOX is becoming the new MSNBC.
I sense a Rove type lurking in the background with Paul Ryan working to get an establishment approved candidate to the front.
Maybe a Turkish Oprah accolyte or someone of that ilk.
I don’t live in PA and if I did, I wouldn’t feel great about the clubs available candidates. But I just don’t think I could vote for Oz.
She gave background to the 10 year old comments and that they were taken out of context.
Yup she didn’t say were she was adjunct professor but directed people to her website. If you wanted that or other info go there. This was her opportunity to show Oz and McCormick have spent $60 million attacking each other and didn’t show up for all the debates and forums.
Were did she fall apart? She was better prepared than the interviewer.
I am embarrassed for anyone claiming Ms. Barnette was “unprepared”, “stumbled”, “hesitant”, “evasive”, “sketchy”etc. etc.
If there was no political context to this interview and it was shown to unbiased speech experts, I’m positive she would be judged as being friendly, engaging, well spoken and intelligent.
She got along well with the interviewer. She handled every question expertly.
I have doubts about anyone referring to her as “sketchy”. You could not honestly say that if you really did watch this interview. Maybe you have another reason to not like her, but this interview was honesty personified.
This is the new “Charlottesville Smear” technique. Because, don’t you know, Trump is a “racist”, because of … Charlottesville. Doesn’t really matter what he actually said, and most smearing him couldn’t tell you.
Pre-frame the event with some offensive, derogatory term, regardless of what was actually said or done.
And then just keep repeating it until the responses start defending the term, and not the actual statements or conduct.
That’s what they’re doing here with Barnette. They tried to call her a “racist” the other day, too. Because she was against radical islam six or eight years ago, about the time they were staging terrorist attacks monthly.
Let’s see…she has a boatload of homophobic tweets, anti Muslim tweets, she sponsored a petition to build a statue of Barack Obama. She denigrated George Washington for owning slaves and called people who admire him “uppity white people”
She won’t win the general election!
Sources for all of those fully and in context, because I don’t really believe anything now a days without references.
The statue would be part of the Garden of Statues – who cares.
I did not, would not, could not vote for Marxist Obama. I could vote for Barnette having listened to Fox, Newsmax, Bannon, interviews, etc.
She sounds better any day than Oz.
Those are all taken out of context. I had an experience like his before; someone takes all these quotes and actions and cut them up into pieces and puts them all back together in a very different way thereby creating a Frederico Fellini movie out of your life. Trust me this has happened to me and it just blows your mind away…she is doing a great job handling the fiction.
All narratives. All b.s.
I guarantee the Dems would eagerly embrace her candidacy if she were running on their ticket. But they know how fight dirty and win. I think she just might be their worst nightmare.
She came across well to folks seeing her for the first time, which is a large portion of FNC viewers.
You are “embarrassed” for Sundance and have “doubts” about him watching the interview he posted?
Sorry.. I watched the interview and I agree with Sundance on this one.
All I had to hear was her “uppity whites” comment, and her denegration of George Washington because he was a slave owner. And her petition to erect a statue to Barack Obama…don’t get me started!!!
She’s TOAST in the general.
Context please.
I disagree.
OMG, Eric.
She said no such thing.
This BS is gonna backfire. Bigly.
Here’s the full vid. that Eric’s referring to, for those who haven’t seen it.
This is the one that Greg Kelly hacked up to use on foolish people who will believe any lie thrown their way:
Why couldn’t she just say it? Did someone create her website for her and she forgot what they put on there as far as where she was an adjunct professor?
It’s really not that hard, just say where. She could’ve said it and directed them to the site. To me, it looks like she isn’t sure what her site says.
Why not just sign the pledge? Everyone else did. Don’t you care about democracy?
Fake litmus tests. Fake news.
We saw all of this with Candidate TRUMP, and then President TRUMP. Puh-lease.
I agree.
Arizona here and the same sort of Karl Rove thing is happening here. Too many supposed “MAGA” type, conservative candidates in the primary to split the true MAGA vote and pave the way for a Club Republican.
The Club Republicans are so corrupt.
I wish MAGA Republicans who are not likely to win in the primary would resign and send their followers over to the most popular MAGA to defeat this.
But in Pennsylvania OZ is not MAGA but Trump may know that neither is Barnette and she may be paid by unsavory sources and owe them.
We need to have some sort of preprimary system setup for this.
President TRUMP could/should have easily done that and he didn’t. He should have vetted her and everyone else before cramming Oz down PAs throats. I tho’t that was what his Save America PAC was for, but it is apparently not By The People, For The People, when he makes all the decsisions with some guy behind the curtain. NO THANKS!
Agree 100% I live in the Poconos in NE PA…I’m voting Oz, Mastriano and Bognet because those are the candidates Trump endorsed.
I was torn between Mastriano and Barletta (I’m grew up in the suburbs of Hazleton and went to school with one of his relatives) but Mastriano fought very hard to get PAs election audited AND was out there fighting to open up PA as soon as possible after COVID when the powers that be just wanted to keep us shut down. Lou was nowhere to be found. And for that my vote goes to Doug Mastriano.
I hate Oz and would not vote for him even if I love Trump.
Luckily Trump gave a better response and has said he’d be behind her if she answers the things in her past that hadn’t been vetted. Well they are vetted now and I’m voting for her.
“She has many things in her past which have not been properly explained or vetted, but if she is able to do so, she will have a wonderful future in the Republican Party — and I will be behind her all the way.
Trump himself had “many things in his past that hadn’t been explained or vetted”.
So much for that argument – besides his cheer-leading to this day for “warp speed”.
I believe Trump was the best president of my lifetime. However, I disagree with him over vaccines and a few other minuscule items. Therefore, I still form my own opinions …
And —
I would vote for Kathy over Oz any day.
Mastriano voted for Act 77 which gave us those horrible, corrupt Mail in ballots. I won’t vote for anyone who did that. Then he tried to get Wolf and Trump to agree to tracking of all people in the state who tested positive for covid, going against HIPPA laws. Then he introduced legislation to take away our right to elect our LT Gov. He has only put on the appearance of trying to get our 2020 election audited. In my opinion he is a sleaze ball. He geta real nasty when he is called on these things. Those mail in ballots could have been stopped before the first one was mailed out. All the senators and all but one rep are responsible for that fiasco.
My vote is for Joe Gale. The only one who can beat Shapiro.
Sorry. Joe Gale is an independent tiger in Montgomery County. Beats the MCRC splitter candidate every time. And I greatly admire him for that.
But he has nowhere near the legs to run a statewide race.
Mastriano is hardly perfect, and he never answered Act 77 to my satisfaction. And he could have fought Jake the Snake harder. Agreed on that.
But he has the legs for it, and is on balance about 90% of the MAGA agenda.
And he can beat Shapiro the scumbag in November.
I have no idea if Oz (or Kathy Barnette) would be one of the better Senators that don’t become RINO’s but I recall him welcoming P Trump on his Oz show and treating him fairly and respectfully during a time when anti-Trumpism lies and attacks were ramped up and expected from all main network hosts other than FNC.
Oz also defended and supported PT’s health analysis etc. when the predatory media was pining for negative news as usual.
Oz can schmooze. He is very polite — very personable. It is what he has supported in the past — over many years that makes me question his recent gun video and current conversion to conservatism. I am not buying what he is selling.
FOX becoming the new MSNBC. Hysterical and so far out of touch with reality.
Yes, she avoids a straight answer to anything, and goes on and on, and she’s so OBVIOUS about it.
She could ix that in no time. But she won’t.
I heard nothing from Kathy Barnette that would keep me from voting for her. Of course, the long knives are out for her. Truth has a way of cutting through the lies.
None of the other candidates will represent the people as citizen legislators. We need that! Enough of the polished, suck-ups to McConnell and the RNC elites.
Give us real, grassroot fairly-elected candidates. Let the people speak, not big money. It’s the message. It’s bigger than the person.
interestingly, Fetterman, the lone Dem suffered a strike a couple of days ago.
Lie.
You should be ashamed of yourself.
Link?
NO SHE IS NOT! You are spreading lies, zero stolen valor and spreading a rumor is nasty. She gave her military records when she was asked. Just because no one asked until she was up in the polls is the media’s fault not hers.
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=527409825706868&set=a.379931467121372
Im guessing you’ve not been in the service, and dont understand what you’ve just posted. From what I can gather she entered as an E-1 Private, served for about 4 months processing all the infinite types of military forms and left as an E-1. This is not an impressive service record at all. The fact that she only served for 4 months is sketchy. Why was that?
She also was not promoted once from the lowest rank. That hardly qualifies you to be a US Senator. No wonder she doesnt talk about it
she was in the reserves. I did the very same thing.
2 months boot camp. 2 months basic electricity. 3 months “A” school. then back home for the rest of the 6 years one weekend a month. I had to request an extension to even get the “A” school.
her military service is virtually meaningless and probably has contributed very little to her growth as a person.
How much U.S. military service have the two clowns done? Zero
The whole topic just doesn’t matter.
“Look, a squirrel!”
That’s very relevant context.
See how badly things can go when context is missing.
What qualifies one to be a Senator is the following :
No Person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty Years, and been nine Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State for which he shall be chosen. [U.S. Constitution, Article I, section 3, clause 3]
She is qualified.
I certainly don’t intend to be disparaging but will point out that document looks like an Army Reserve document and is not a DD-214. She said in an interview that she was in the Army/ AR for ten years. The document says she was E-1, the lowest rank in the military. I would think that after ten years she would be at least E-5 or E-6. The document also shows no ribbons or awards. She would have been awarded at least the Army Service Ribbon.
https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/Army_Service_Ribbon
Regarding her time in service, the only dates cited are for 1990, one year. No trying to rain on anybody’s parade. Recommend that she produce her DD-214 to clear everything up.
Her website lists four documents. She said she was in the National Guard and then the Reserves, several people I trust say her documents say confirm that.
https://barnetteforsenate.com/things-you-want-to-know/
Thank you. Very good. Her ribbon progression checks. “Trust but verify.” -Ronald Reagan
the reserves are nothing. if you are not putting in the active duty it is very difficult or impossible to make rank
almost all I did for 6 years was half the time listen to useless lectures and the other half set up tables in the reserve center for lunch
Reserve duty counts for virtually nothing.
She could have left it completely off her CV but then some, err, people, would, umm, complain, about her leaving it out.
I was talking to my plumber several days ago during a call to my house. He saw my medals and ribbons on my desk in a shadow box and said he was in the reserves for four years and did not really do anything like what I did. He did say that he went to Fort Polk for 6 weeks of training and it was scary. Anyway, I told him that I once talked to a Marine who spent his service in a conning tower at a Marine air base and he felt bad that he never did anything really active in the Marines. I told him not to despair because he might be in the conning one minute drinking a cup of coffee and five minutes later be on the tarmac in the middle of an av-gas fire. My daughter was in the Army Reserves in Bosnia. Occasionally she would call me and I would ask her how it is going and she would say she was bored. I would tell her bored is good. When it is not boring, that is bad. If you are on duty, you never take bored for granted, regardless what your job is. It can change in a heartbeat. When Tolstoy was on the Western front he said that the irony of war is that while you might be sitting there in your trench playing cards and smoking tobacco, on the other side of your hill men are killing each other and dying in the most horrible ways.
PS. I have hid my military service from almost everyone since being discharged 50 years ago. The reason I brought my ribbons out of darkness was not to brag. When the 13 Marines and many others were murdered in Afghanistan I felt like I wanted to do something to commemorate them and displaying my stuff was what came to mind.
What I and many others did was hell on earth and I do not with it on any military person. If you had easy duty, I celebrate you. You have both arms and legs. You do not wake up in cold sweats or nightmares. Perhaps re-examine your service time and look for what you gained from it. Enuf said.
Beautifully expressed and heartfelt. Thank you, for your service and for these words.
But Barnette was not guaranteed to not be called up when she signed up. Many National Guard and Reserve Units do get called to active duty.
She never claimed it was active duty and there is no reason for her to not list it.
The Reserves do not issue DD-214’s and the demand she produce one can never be met. It is a false flag op to give the uniformed like you the belief she is being evasive.
It clearly worked on you.
She cites it as a DD214 on her website. But your point is well taken as the document does not have the DD214 designator at the top right hand corner. It is slightly different but equivalent. Whew! False flag op averted. 👍🏻
Specifics please? That would be a deal breaker.
That’s a damn lie.
Marc—
Mario has pants on fire. That happens when one is a liar.
Okay, I had my fun.
I’ll stop now!
She has a video denigrating that slave owner George Washington, and calling those who admire him “uppity white people”.
She sponsored a petition to erect a statue to Barack Obama, you know, that guy who disparaged PA voters because we cling to our guns and bibles…don’t you remember that bitter clingers comment? Well, Barnette wants to build a friggin statue to that communist evil bastard. And shes is a BLM supporter.
She has homophobic tweets, she has anti Muslim tweets.
She will NEVER win a PA general election as a Republican.
You are still not posting specifics in context, just repeating the same things.
OMG. That is an outright lie. re. George Washington.
And MANY people posting/reading here KNOW it , because they all saw the full vid that Greg Kelly hacked up to make you fools believe the BS he was peddling.
People are so desperate to trash her and. all it’s done is make her name more well known than it ever would have been.
Classic. Backfire.
The statute was part of Trump’s Garden of Statues I thought – so who cares.
Anyone who would want to erect a statue of the divisive and race-baiting Obama will never get a vote or second look from me!
I detest Obama and everything he stands for BUT if I were a poor Black kid living in North Philadelphia I would be inspired to know I could one day be president. I say this as Catholic kid who grew up in the 70’s and 80’s and regularly saw pictures of JFK hanging in people’s homes. Yes. That was actually a thing. And everyone I knew voted for Reagan.
And people who weren’t around back then may not realize just how much flack JFK took fr/ the Media for being Catholic.
I was just a little kid (6 or 7?) – and not even Catholic!- who paid no attention to Politics. But the pushback against a Catholic as Prez was so intense that even *I* heard it all the time for months.
Word was he’d be more loyal to the Pope th/ the country.
Her reasons for the Obama statue made sense to me.
If anyone finds the vid, please re-post it.
How so ? Be specific. Why are you posting lies?
No she isn’t. She supplied records regarding her service in the reserves.
Mario- liar, liar pants on fire! I saw copies of her records.
I don’t live in PA and can’t really opine on Barnette.
OTOH, read this from Sam Faddis / ANDMagazine. Very damning. If I were in PA, no way would I vote for Oz:
https://andmagazine.substack.com/p/we-know-oz-is-not-a-pennsylvanian?s=r
I’ve decided to vote for Mastriano and Barnette. I don’t know where else to turn when it comes to Barnette. I think she’s got the best chance of winning the primary of the candidates I’ve decided are suitable. In the gubernatorial race, I was leaning strongly toward White until he received the backing of the GOP. With Trump endorsing Mastriano, I’ve decided to go that route. My thought is we need politicians who are not afraid of the press. We need people to say what sane people are thinking. So that’s why I’m going with these two. I think my husband is going Barnette and White.
White is a rich GOP donor developer out of DelCo, pretending to be a “blue collar guy”. Establishment.
Mastriano and Barnette are the best picks tomorrow. Both have good general election legs.
I’m not sure Mastriano has as good general election legs as Barnette. First off, both are despised by the PA GOP. But Barnette can get support in Philadelphia’s Black churches. Enough to overcome any voter fraud. Coupling the fraud with the GOP’s distaste for Mastriano, I have a hard time picturing him winning. I’m voting for him anyway because I think White will be too afraid of what the liberals will think of him to be the next DeSantis so we might as well have a Dem in there for all it matters.
No way…Barnette has homophic, anti Muslim tweets all over the place. She will NOT win a PA general election.
You really think the people in the churches in North Philadelphia care about her tweets? When we’re paying almost $5/gallon for gas here in SE PA? Contrary to what the media tells you, Black people by and large don’t hate Trump. I think she would do very well with his support.
You keep saying this without showing proof or context.
reeks of desperation lol
All he’s got is slander.
Eric, your adgenda is noted.
Please return to wherever you came from. Your work here is done.
Yes, she will.
If Barnette gets into the Senate, she will be another MTG or Boebert type.
Lot’s of interest will be in her as she does appear to have fight! (She will need an honest America 1st mentor. )
Add her and Palin, formidable in the senate.
If Barnette and Palin make it to the Senate, they could do worse than emulate Rand Paul.
Barnette is not likely to win in that purple state
and Sarah Palin is not running for the Senate.
Correct. She has homophobic and anti-Muslim tweets all over the place…she’ll get fried in the general.
Right against a man who held an unarmed black man at gun point.
How is that going to play after what happened in Buffalo?
oops, you are right Everybody! Palin is running for House. I hope Barnette and Palin are elected. They WILL get alot of media attention and I’m happy that both are outspoken.
PA is not purple. PA is red. Republican voter registrations have been dwarfing Democrat registrations here for several years. The only way a Dem wins here is by cheating. MAGA poll watchers will be watching all elections VERY closely going forward to minimize the cheating that does occur. Oz and McCormick are not the answer. Barnette is just not polished in campaigning and interviews, which is good in my book. Barnette CAN win in November, especially once Trump gets behind her. It will be up to us to make sure she delivers on promises once in office. We are no longer settling for RINOs!
Has Paul changed? As far as I know and I think was detailed here McConnell saved his failing campaign. A few public acts do not change the leopard to a tiger.
During an interview with Breitbart, she announced she would NOT support the GOP candidate if she loses. Sounds sketchy.
Do you have a link for that? i’ve never heard her say that.
She never said it.
Said she’d never vote for a Globalist.
I guess – in some people’s minds, like Oggi here- Globalist= Republican.
I happen to think that there ARE still some Repubs who are NOT Globalists.
Why should she? There were many who ran for president who didn’t support or help Trump. You didn’t see Bush out stumping for Trump did you?
None of us want to support the RINO if she loses! If a RINO is on the ticket in November, it will reduce the Republican turn-out. That’s what she is trying to say. In actuality, Barnette is the ONLY one who can defeat the Dem in November by energizing the MAGA turnout!
Mastriano has endorsed Barnette.
I posted his twit a day or two ago.
If OZ wins the primary, look at the two PA has to chose from.
It would become a LOTE vote…way low LOTE.
I don’t think OZ will energize people enough to outvote the democrat. And will media even mention the negatives of the democrat? But OZ’s negs will be shown.
I wish PA well and that Barnett is the real deal, wins and surprises us all that we can’t put people in boxes based on what we’ve seen in others e.g. rinos in AM 1st clothing.
The ONLY way a republican win a PA statewide election is with crossover votes. Barnette has anti Muslim and homophobic tweets, she will get fried by these in the general. She is funded by the virulently anti-Trump globalist organization, club for growth. Why would they fund her in a primary? Just to see Trump’s endorsed candidate go down.
You don’t know PA if you think that. PA after the last 2 1/2 years is ripe for her to win the general.
She has been campaigning in Philly and at churches not only places like country clubs like Oz.
Plenty of people think she can win the black vote better th/ most R’s.
Jack Brewer is one. I agree w/ Brewer.
she still refuses to say which “college” she taught at
It’s on her website and the college confirms
why should I have to search for the answer? Can’t I hear it from her own lips and see her mannerisms in the response? sketchy, I say!
Guess you didn’t get the answer you hoped for.
So you are lazy? I want to know who I’m voting for and have looked at all their websites. But I’m in PA and this is important to me. She has named it in other interviews.
Here is the link for you https://barnetteforsenate.com/things-you-want-to-know/
Oh, so you like being spoonfed…no wonder the RINOs keep winning.
Very sketchy!
Okay, WE GET IT!! YOU DON’T LIKE THE WOMAN….
In this country and in this comment section we have a history of allowing others to speak, sharing their unique perspectives in order to best formulate our own.
Please allow others to voice their opinion without you constantly interjecting your objections to the lady.
Your repetitions are discrediting you – unless reverse psychology is what you are practising?
basic due diligence requires one to visit the candidate’s website
Only took a couple minutes to find the info on her website. But I still wonder why she just didn’t say “Judson”.
Well, I am thinking she did not get into answer directly on all these smears because she would have been on the defense the whole time and some people, many on this site, would then say, oh she was so defensive the whole time. She was very smart to say what she wanted to say instead of constantly defending her self.
“it’s been said that you beat your wife, can you confirm or deny?”
then forever smeared as a wife beater
I believe it is “do you still beat your wife”
Got us to go to her website and the first thing you see is a way to DONATE. Pretty cute way to get you to look at her site and maybe donate.
Good heavens, the way she’s being attacked lately I’m surprised she can remember her own name. I truly haven’t seen anything like this since Trump himself ran.
“2. Where was she an adjunct professor?
Kathy was an adjunct professor at Judson University in Illinois . ”
That is from her site.
And Judson University has confirmed that.
She did not answer well about her military service. All she needs to do is release her DD214. Every single veteran knows that is the norm.
You mean this one, that she released last week?
What is it with establishment knives that just keep repeating the lie, even after it is disproven?
Blahahaha Nice!
Checkmate.
What next?
Because it works to keep repeating it and there are people on this sight who fall for it…sad.
they are getting paid for each post
but they are instead motivating me to send money to Barnette if she makes it out of the primary
and 5 minutes ago I had no dog in a Pennsylvania fight
Not for a demoncrat. No public release from my “Senator” Peters in the 30 years he’s been in public office.
Speaking of Democrats, let’s see Oz’s military papers.
Oz served two years in the Turkish armed forces, claiming it was to retain citizenship, but he automatically is a Turk since both of his parents are Turks. He voted in Turkey’s 2018 election.
https://www.worldviewweekend.com/tv/video/anni-cyrus-islamic-worldview-dr-oz
He has also said he would not relinquish his Turkish citizenship in order to get security clearances. i believe that means there are some committees he wouldn’t be able to serve on.
sounds like he’s willing to sacrifice a lot for America
Not!
Her military records are all over the Internet now.
Why do you keep repeating last week’s GOPe lie?
She may not be the most eloquent or fiery speaker
but I would vote for her.
Pres. Trump endorsed Oz because he’s got the bucks and name recognition and “can win” but thats not what Americans are asking for.
She’s like that horse Rich Strike. Came out of nowhere and just found a way through the pack.
Plus the Maga King said
“ if she does win he would back her 100 percent ”
If he’s not against her he’ll be for her.
It’s good to know we don’t automatically go with Trump’s choices but can think for ourselves.
If Trump would have endorsed her she would be running away with it.
the opposite
it was her recent big-deal speech that helped catapult her up
Barnette ran the entire race and no one paid her any attention.
She is no Rosie Ruiz.
Like we have a wonderful group of 100 in the Senate. It is basic. She is not in the “club”, from the wrong background, wrong schools, wrong life experience. They do not want her in the Country Club. I do not know what school she taught at, but I can tell you the 100 in the Senate have degrees in Jackology!
Barnette scares the living HELL out of them, and you can take that to the bank.
She was in D.C. on J6. She organized buses to D.C. on J6. She did that to protest the fraudulent election. What has Oz done for Trump to protest the stolen election?
I listened to the interview.
She’s not polished like Mittens but I’m not seeing how she did not do well?
She said accusations were false and to check her website. Good enough for me if I would choose to check it out.
Is ANYONE familiar with President Trump’s methodology on selecting endorsed candidates? Has he shared?
I have started thinking he listens to RINOs who tell him people like Kathy can’t win…he has been listening to RINOs for so long he is beginning to think like them.
FWIW: If you have followed DJT the person, businessman prior to his candidacy, you would know that he had (and continues to have) built the best Intelligence service by hiring retired military intelligence, retired FBI, etc. to work for him and he also had the best personal Security (and to date still uses his own).
You might be curious why would he see the need for such a security and intelligence force while in the real estate business.
Well, he wanted to know everything he could possibly know before conducting any deals worldwide and one of those business people was Wilbur Ross, Commerce Secretary during his 4 yr. term. (Whom he dealt with in the business world along time ago; they admire and respect one another, although they have been on different sides of deals).
Ross has made this statement many, many times : “Underestimate Donald J. Trump at your own peril.”
So, from those here commenting, people are going to do what comes naturally, vote their biases, regardless of their “love for PDJT”, their “respect for PDJT”, their “support of PDJT”. …AND if their candidate loses; they are going to BLAME PDJT!!! Because: “He cannot make good personnel appointment”, “he made a lot of mistakes picking members of his cabinet”, ” makes a lot of mistakes”, “Trump isn’t perfect”, “Trump is wrong”, “ignore Trump, vote your conscience”, “he’ll come around and support her anyway….”…blah, blah, blah, blah!
Sundance took time out to do more research and wrote this post and those same people, along with most likely more, who “love Sundance and appreciate all of his research, hard work, blah, blah, blah…….”now also say the same of Sundance as they are saying about PDJT! LOL!!! I love it! “I disagree with Sundance”, “Sundance is wrong on this one”…..
Which proves the point of the often used phrase: They “can’t see the forest through the trees”………..
AND that’s just the way it is.
And it’s not going to be any different next week in Georgia and that is where the goal of the GOPe resides….they have to take Georgia but the pathway is through Pennsylvania.
Now I will tell you, PDJT has pointed this out on several occasions and knows this perfectly. BUT, it will not change any minds and people are going to vote the way they want and if their candidate loses or if the Dem’s take control….they are going to blame everybody and everything else but themselves and the real reasons they made their choice.
It is their choice but they won’t accept the fact that they DID NOT PAY ATTENTION TO THE WARNING SIGNS given by PDJT and Sundance, just to name a few.
Trump can be wrong. He has made less than stellar choices in the past. PDJT has pretty much said if she gets vetted and people decide to vote for her, he will support her.
Trump is trying to keep track of a lot of races right now, so I wouldn’t be surprised if he really didn’t know her background and just the top two. She’s worked hard to get in the top 2 and I hope she beats both Oz and McCormick because I hate Oz and Trump hates McCormick.
“She has many things in her past which have not been properly explained or vetted, but if she is able to do so, she will have a wonderful future in the Republican Party — and I will be behind her all the way.
Whatever makes you feel justified in your decision-making process.
Rationalize away.
why would any decent person want to be polished like Pierre?
I don’t think he is “polished”. He’s stiff and mechanical.
If she were running for Gov. in Oregon I would vote for her in a heartbeat. What was wrong with her interview?
I saw nothing wrong, only pluses for me.
The only thing sketchy about the interview was Bream claiming to nothing about the Fetterman shotgun incident.
The farce is strong with this one.
Are you opining for the GOPe?!
She has done many lengthy interviews that went extremely well.
However, the wording of her past tweets will haunt her everyday during the general election and be a scandal on national news non stop.
So, that is a valid consideration for voters.
I’m not saying vote, or don’t vote. Just saying it is one thing to weigh in on.
Here is another bad interview (I’ve posted the great interviews also over the past few days).
********
“I Never Would Have Said That” – PA Senate Candidate Kathy Barnette Denies Posting Islamophobic Tweets on Her Still Active Twitter Account (VIDEO)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/never-said-pa-senate-candidate-kathy-barnette-denies-posting-islamophobic-tweets-video/
So what!?
She gives a bad interview or two it means she’s not a polished wannabe professional politician.
She’s human.
What about Ozzie’s stance and flip flop on “gun control” ? Will that not haunt him in everyday in the General election? If the answer is NO it’s because he agreed with the Communist Democrats or if Yes it’s because his very recent flip flop getting Trump’s endorsement? This is just one example of the Oprah Turkey…uh…Oz’s flip flops.
https://www.personaldefenseworld.com/2021/12/dr-oz-supports-gun-control/
Want another flip flop recently from the Oprah Turkey…uh… Oz? Article from none other than the Commie Democrat website Yahoo Snews. Same question as above? Will that haunt him everyday in the General Election? Same No or Yes quandary.
https://news.yahoo.com/inside-dr-oz-shameless-flip-011458078.html
More important issues than a “islamophobic” tweet don’t you think? I am a 100% President Trump supporter, but I will not be a sheeple like the Democrat Communist and agree with everything he says or does. I can think for myself and I hope the America First people in my northern neighbor of Pennsylvania are the same.
I support Trump because of his policies and most promises kept, but I also remember the bad picks of “Mad Dog Mattis”, Chris Wray, et al. or endorsements like Mitt Romney, etc. IMO, many times Trump’s choice of people for MAGA positions leave a lot to be desired. Personally, I believe that Turkey Oz is another one of them. But I don’t live in PA so the choice is not mine. I am stuck with another Trump 2020 MAGA endorsement Shelly Moore Capito, a Mcconnell cloture vote to sell or trade. A flop flop and one of the 19 RINO’s that voted for that damnable so called infrastructure bill. If “Sell you out” Moore Capito is MAGA, then I am a space shuttle pilot. But who am I but a lowly America First, independent thinking deplorable?
As a 26 yr military personnel administrator…her “discharge” after basic training would be the normal “release from active duty” that would be expected for a reservist. Reservists sign up for a period of “active duty for training” with the regular component, then released from active duty to serve as a “drilling reservist” in the reserve component. All normal. That’s why a Reenlistment Code of “NA”, indicating that her release was NOT a “final discharge”. Many folks (even inside of the military) confuse the concept of “Discharge” and “Release From Active Duty”.
Thanks for clarifying.
Since she was National Guard and then Reserves her paper work is different than someone who was active duty.
You like others have confirmed there is nothing fishy about it.
So zero stolen valor and those saying or repeating it are just spreading lied.
exactly.
ACDUTRA then years of weekend warrior
this topic is such a waste of time
So now according to BB, she will not support the GOP candidate who beats her in the primary (if she loses).
Oh how I’ve seen this much too often. It’s a Ted Cruz tantrum tactic. No matter who the voters decide to send to DC the challengers need to check their egos at the door. And anyone who thinks that she is/was a Trump supporter is deluded. It’s all about her…24/7 and she’ll push it in your face 24/7. Just on that statement alone should nix her as a candidate.
“So now according to BB”
That was your first mistake.
She said she would not support a GLOBALIST.
They put the R word in their headline, and in the question
It was a YES or NO question . . .
which she apparently chose not to answer.
I agree with her on that 100%. I won’t be voting for any globalist in the general either, whether they have a D or an R in front of their name. They are the real enemies of a return to the Constitutional republic that our country once was.
yup, if the GOPe manage to get Herrera-buetler to the general in WA3, I am at least not voting for her and at worst may vote for the demonrat just to defeat the GOPe.
The GOPe is the primary enemy at this point.
Same. ⬆️⬆️
She’s getting funding from the globalist Club For Growth!
Club for Growth is only interested in defeating a Trump endorsement to build a narrative on.
They don’t give a damn about Barnette.
I don’t understand why some insist that I “close ranks” with people who hate me and want to destroy me, just because they have an ‘R’ behind their name and won a primary.
I’ve been writing in names on ballots for decades, rather than casting a vote for someone who hates the US and hates me.
I will not vote for my own demise.
And in my book RINOs are a greater threat to this nation than the Democrats. With a Democrat you know they hate you and want you dead.
RINOs give you a hug while they shove the knife deeper into your back.
Exactly what i was thinking, but you said it better. I won’t be voting for either in the general.
No idea on this Barnette gal except to say be careful. Republican primaries are good places for plants and other mischievous characters to ply their trade. Funny how you almost never read about republican plants in democrat primaries. They get driven-out before the ink is dry on the paperwork. Yes, the GOP is that incompetent and corrupt.
My real rub is with how much of a sewer FOX news has become. I stopped watching them mid-summer 2020 when all of their hair-hat anchors went on relentless anti-trump lectures full of MSM lies. It appears FOX is even worse now.
She’s been writing Conservative essays since 2010, at the latest. So that’s at least 12 years.
I posted a link last week to the mag she was writing for. One of the articles was about all the destruction Obama was doing to the country- From 2010.
Barnette started a petition to have a statue of Obama and family put next to the Lincoln emancipation stature. She said to show how far blacks have come. So the most racially divisive president in recent history should represent how far blacks have come. Did she really think this through or maybe she lied about never voting for or supporting Obama. I for one don’t want a statue of Obama anywhere on capital grounds….ever.
I don’t know a single black person who is not proud of the first black President no matter their politics.
Did she vote for him twice? Being proud is one thing, voting for him because of his skin color is another. If she did vote for the Marxist America hater, PA ers
need to know.
She says no. She said when Obama first came on the scene she was interested, but that it took very little research to see where he was on issues.
There are tweets on election day in 2016 where she talks about being on her way to vote for Trump.
I haven’t seen any tweets supporting Obama as pres. There are tweets criticizing him as pres.
And articles criticizing Obama fr/ 2010!
what is OZ’s voting record over the past 20 years?
are there ANY conservatives?
She also called him a Muslim which we are also supposed to be outraged about.
No, she did not. She has stated that. It’s on her website and her Facebook page. I, however, did, and I’m not proud of that. I didn’t realize how bad he was until his second term. I was a Democrat at the time. Since then, I vet candidates very carefully. It’s why I left the Democrats in 2016, and why I’m voting for Kathy tomorrow. I’ve been following her for several years now and she has been consistently 100% conservative.
Did that Turkey Oz vote for Obama when he was hanging around Oprah? Hum???????
A person’s vote is a private matter protected by the Constitution. Mastriano weighed in early for Barnette and that should matter much more.
Jesse Lee Peterson . . .
Now you do. I was never proud of that man and I will never be…EVER.
Of course, a confession of faith in Christ would go a long way….
I do. I have a friend who is a true Christian and who is black. She despises what Obama stood for and what he did.
What is there to be proud of exactly? He was only voted in because of his skin color. It certainly wasn’t on merit. That is an embarrassment.
She was wring anti- Obama essays back in 2010!
They were posted here at CTH.
My gawd people, do a little research before slandering this woman w/ your made up/imaginary BS.
Agree 100%
If what you say is true, black people have come a long way. I can see how black people would have pride there.
Sadly Obama missed his chance to be a great and unifying president.
‘Sketchy.’ Good word to describe the impression she leaves for some of us. She’s seems to be trying to exploit and profit off her status as “byproduct” (her word) of rape, which leaves a strong distaste…
Glad I don’t have to decide who to vote for in that particular race. They all are turn-offs, it seems. 🙁
If you were in PA you’d be doing more research, not just listening to 1 video and internet keyboard warriors.
Her records are very standard for service in the National Guard and Reserves, that from people I know and trust that have been in the military.
They aren’t what people maybe used to because she was never deployed. She’s never claimed to have been deployed.
Again here is copies of her paperwork, where do you have problems with it?
https://barnetteforsenate.com/things-you-want-to-know/
So Barnette today on Breitbart radio says she won’t endorse any of the other candidates if she loses. My guess is that she does expect supporters of her primary opponents to support her though if she wins.
Not ready for primetime Kathy.
umm the GOPe will come after her MUCH harder if she wins
McConnel will do ANYTHING to keep her out of the Senate
But the GOPe will not make the GOP losers endorse HER!
I’ve seen this before, when running US Senate campaign against Barbara Boxer in ’92.
The GOPe squish lost, GOPe would not make the squish endorse, the RINOs sat on their hands, pouting and sulking, and we lost that open seat by 1.5% points.
And we got lots of years of the odious Boxer after that.
Matthew Boyle at Breitbart asked, “If you do not win tomorrow, do you intend to support the Republican nominee whoever it is?”
“I have no intentions of supporting globalists,” Barnette said. “I believe we have ran out of room on this runway for this spaceship. I believe we have very little rope left to just roll the dice and we’ll see how it all works out on the other end. I believe our country is in trouble. I don’t believe we have much longer and I believe what I have done is I have made it possible where Pennsylvanians do not have to hold their nose and vote for the lesser of two evils this time. I don’t think we have room to just vote for any old warm body with an R next to their name. I think we can do better than that.”
That’s a NO she will not support whoever wins the Primary?
And that is a great answer.
No, we will not support the pro-abortion gun grabber, or the Mitch McConnell robot pick anymore, just because they have an “R” on their forehead.
The “R” no longer guarantees our vote anymore. It’s the damn Uniparty playing their old game again.
Well….most definitely does not follow Ronald Reagan’s philosophy “Thou shalt speak ill of any Fellow Republican…”
Giving the supporters food for thought: Divisive much?
This is no longer the Republican Party of Ronald Reagan.
It has become the Republican Party of neo-cons, Bushes, Mitch McConnell, and the Swamp.
They fought PDJT tooth and nail for 4 years, and then participated in the 2020 election coup and its cover up.
And now they want Barnette out.
She already IS out and would have no chance to beat the Dem challenger in November in that purple state of Pennsylvania. She should focus on a seat in the House in 2024 and Trump would gladly endorse her. But being pragmatic, like it or not, our best option to win that Senate seat this year is Dr. Oz. He will most likely stand with President Trump and his AMERICA FIRST agenda and he will have no particular loyalty to the mushmouth Turtle McConnell.
Back to playing the “unelectable” card again. It’s like a little merry-go-round with you Barnette bashers.
You’re out of cards.
Sorry, the abortion-loving, gun-grabbing Oz can haul his slick, carpet-bagging keister back to North Jersey.
It will keep his flights to Davos to hang with Klaus shorter flying out of Newark.
It’s like Trump endorsing Lindsey Graham.
For us South Carolinians that’s a tough nut to swallow.
I didn’t vote for LG and I’m a staunch Trump supporter.
Whatever chess move he was planning with that he should of filled us in.
Whatever move he’s planning here, too many people just can’t see Oprah’s lib doctor running their state.
At the end of the day, a populace president still needs the people’s support!
Don’t you know?
It was so Lindsey Graham could privately tell his Senate pals that Joe Biden was the “right choice”.
At least he didn’t vote to impeach Trump, like that other great endorsement, Mitt Romney, did.
Key words “ most likely”.
Trump endorsed Mittens.
They said Trump had “no chance” remember?!
Maybe she’ll blow up their algorithm??
Not a PA voter so take my opinion with a grain of salt. OZ is just another grifter and how exactly will he win or help Trump? Trump is powerless to change anything at this point. His time in the White House is DONE. Time to face reality. WE CANNOT VOTE our way out of this.
But keep arguing how Trump’s endorsement over Barnette will mean anything.
Being pragmatic is what got us here.
Let’s all vote on the most efficient way to destroy this country.
If we were pragmatic, we’d drop the whole 2020 election steal and line up with Mitch and the boys. I am not pragmatic since it hasn’t done me any good in the past regarding voting for the lesser of two evils.
PTrump hasn’t even announced he will run yet. Pressure on OZ from inside the Senate would be much greater than any influence PTrump would have if he is not next President. IMO
Stroked out Fetterman will beat no one.
If “divisive” you mean Rhino hierarchy tries to tank her election and her platform by promoting / electing more Globo-Homo-Uniparty sell-outs….
Yes, I’m much divisive.
“Republican Party”?
That ship has sailed.
We either get our “America First” candidates elected running as Republicans or we’re electing snakes in the proverbial grass.
Their bite will sting harder than the Dems. Look at all of the “Republicans” that worked to undermine Trump!
I think RINOs are divisive, and it sounds like Ms. Barnette supports true Republican values, not the Globalist evil supported by so many nominal Republican politicians today.
What year did Reagan say that? It’s 2022 now, not the same …
Who cares? I will be the first to speak ill of all the Republicans who did not stand up and defend sitting President Trump. As well as of all those who were arranging to have Hillary win instead of him in 2016 (my brother, who was a delegate at the R. convention, took video of them meeting to arrange that).
Oz and McCormick are bashing her and spreading lies about her…. so they aren’t following Reagan’s philosophy either!
the current Republican party tries to DESTROY any pub that they are against
loved Reagan but he gave us Bush
You have reading comprehension skills MANY here do not. She gave an intelligent and WISE answer. MAYBE … she is not the best choice at this time and place but claiming the interview proves that is absolute rubbish. She reminds me of a Sarah Palin, but way better prepared than Ms. Palin was when she ran with McStain. I believe she could win the general election. What an attractive woman on so many levels!
Kudos!
I’m definitely Team Barnette now
Thank you!
She sounds like a smart person.
Never support those who would destroy you, even if they have an ‘R’ behind their name.
And that is really the only answer I would support.
Both parties will take you to the same place in the same hand basket. One just goes a little faster than the other, perhaps (I’ve been in both, worked with candidates in both). I won’t vote for any of the others either.
MAGA should have started its own party. She’d be the only candidate running for PA Senate if that had happened.
Sigh … As I have stated here before, I was around in politics and was friends with some of the Perot guys who were getting the Reform Party registered and on the ballot in every state. I got to see it from the inside, to some degree.
It would cost BILLIONS to do, take a minimum of 2-4 years, and be fought even more vigorously that then by the Uniparty.
Are you willing to raise a million or so for this? Oh…No?? Do you know others that could, or will you be like most MAGA/conservatives and cheap out?
BILLIONS.
Fund the CDC to “comprehensively study gun violence”.
Because the CDC has not done enough damage to America already.
Say hello to the real Dr. Oz.
“It’s time we treat shootings as a public health problem.”
Alright… everybody just relax… it’s not like the WHO is going to be controlling U.S. Federal gun laws and executive policies or sumthin’!
Given the people who claim, “Barnette has no chance of winning the general” and “Oz will get crushed in the general” and all the other karl rovian GOPe Inc canards, did Oz just throw the election?
2018.
Well, Oz has the leftwing loons at Columbia worried. Clearly they would prefer someone else on the GOP ticket in November. Someone, anyone but him to run against Fetterman.
“The University has basically erased information that connects it to its distinguished alumnus Dr. Mehmet Oz, who is running as a Republican for a seat in the U.S. Senate.
Columbia’s actions toward Oz are reminiscent of the University of Pennsylvania distancing itself from Trump after his election.
While Columbia proudly claims President Barack Obama and Yale proudly claims President John F. Kennedy, Penn refuses to even talk about being the alma mater of their only president.
While other U.S. presidents have entire halls and schools named after them, the only place where Trump’s name can be found at Penn is on a plaque in the main library honoring the class of 1968.” ~ The College Fix
That’s what I would instruct them to do if I was Karl Rove too.
They’re probably afraid he might take votes away from the democrat. Because he’s basically a democrat himself.
President Trump’s name was already on quite a number of things before he was elected to the Presidency, it actually got removed from several things as a result of his Presidency by the dunces who were unable to appreciate a President who cared about and worked for the benefit of the American citizenry. Including a street in downtown Chicago.
Oh but Oz is a real 2A supporter. /s
Check out his ad. Cringe to the max.
Ok, what if they are all Sketchy? Oz is not a conservative, McCormick is the club candidate, Barnette is a poser, and the rest have a lot of work to do.
As a PA voter a week ago I was at the first two Oz is slimy and wouldn’t vote for him and McCormick is Swamp and GOPe and Trump hates him. I wouldn’t vote for either of them.
I was hoping for someone from the pack to pull ahead and Barnette did because she’s actually worked at getting to know people and campaigning.
It will be interesting tomorrow at the polls who is there talking to people.
The other issue now is that the MAGA candidates, just like the tea party, are mostly fakes, some are actual democrats, and the rest are riding the wave.
That is an increasing issue: grifters who latch on to the MAGA movement for quick fame and/or dollars.
Case in point: Jenna Ellis, who sat next to Rudy Giuliani, but was happy to defend Disney against Ron DeSantis and the FL anti-grooming law.
Another issue is originally pro-MAGA candidates, who as they climb the political ladder into more difficult arenas, get hijacked by RINO alliances, dollars and consultants that they mistakenly reach out to.
Case in point: Mo Brooks.
I can’t vote for Oz specifically for his support of transgender bull-feces.
So, tomorrow, I’m going to have to pull for Barnett and I guess Mastriano, although he needs to decertify the 2020 PA Votes for President.
Unfortunately, no one is going to decertify 2020. That ship has sailed.
Dr. Oz is the only GOP candidate who could pull enough democrat & independent votes to win in a general election. It’s not about who’s the most MAGA in the primary; it’s about WINNING in November. President Trump knows that, you should too.
It’s amazing what Congress can do-down the road- we just need the correct power seated.
Mastriano endorsed Barnette.
She wants the 2020 election decertified.
Maybe if they both win, it’ll give him the kick he needs to decertify? Who knows.
He tried. I watched every minute of his 4 hour hearing. They didn’t let him pursue it.
… and Tim Ramthun has tried to do the same thing here in WI, but the other RINOs are acting as if it can’t be done.
If she claimed having gone to OCS, and the only documentation she provides is a kinda sorta discharge paper from the Army Reserve that state she reached E4 status, Dems will eat her alive
Believe she said she was accepted into OCS. Not that she accepted and entered.
Don’t confuse things with facts.
It messes up the talking point.
Then they just circle back to one of the others. It gets monotonous.
True. She says she was accepted. Then met the love of her life and got married. As much as she loved OCS idea …she prioritized getting married and did not go to OCS.
She has stated that she didn’t enter because she got married and decided to focus on her family rather than pursue OCS.
The Dems already have plenty on her…..
But it makes no difference to so many here..
She has rallied her supporters; they are here defending what may very well be a lose-lose proposition but this will continue henceforth.
Forest through the trees; that’s what is at stake.
Oh please don’t hurt us, Dems!
Let’s run the least offensive candidate we can.
Where have we heard that losing nonsense before?
The forest is the Uniparty. We’re in the process of chopping it down, one tree at a time.
O.S., spot on. Do you think it ever enters the DNC to run the least offensive candidate? Nope. They play hardball. As shall we henceforth.
She talks about Obama here, too.
For those here who somehow still think she’s an O supporter.
You can be proud that someone was the first black president without supporting them.
I don’t know any black person who is not proud of the first black President…
Seems you only know racist, demonrat blacks who do as they are told by the party of darkness, chaos and death.
They are not proud of his politics but that a black person was elected president.
Barnett knocking it out of the park on Bonginos national radio show.
Ooze and the GOPe numbnuts didn’t have the time.
I trust Trump and he wants Oz – Oz it is.
Love our legal president but he isn’t a god. He booted the pooch with Oz. Oz will not win in a general election.
Trump didn’t know she’d surge and didn’t know much about her. To me this part of his statement last week says if she gets vetted and clears up other items… and wins he’ll be behind her.
“She has many things in her past which have not been properly explained or vetted, but if she is able to do so, she will have a wonderful future in the Republican Party — and I will be behind her all the way.
two hours ago she announced, reportedly, she would not support the GOP candidate if it was not her
put a fork in her candidacy
“reportedly”
Please post a Link to a video or a tweet directly from Kathy Barnette saying that, or that must be regarded as unsubstantiated hearsay.
OTOH, she apparently did NOT say she would instead support the DemoCommie candidate, else that would have been included in the rumor. She probably feels strongly (like many others) that Oz is being disingenuous like so many GOPe politicians and will not ultimately advocate and vote for pro-MAGA policies.
That’s a lie.
She said she would not support a Globalist Candidate.
Get the words right.
Dr. Oz is NOT a globalist. He said he would work with Trump and is 100% AMERICA FIRST.
She did not name names.
What makes you think she is referring to Oz, here?
He “said.” But what has he done and said in the recent past? He’s a fraud and Trump should not have endorsed him.
Oz is a globalist!
If he was America first… why does he still have Turkish citizenship, etc, etc, etc.
Fake news. She said she would not vote for GLOBALISTS.
Do the math yourself if you can.
GOP U.S. Senate candidate Kathy Barnette in an interview on Monday morning refused to support the GOP nominee for U.S. Senate in Pennsylvania if she does not win the nomination on Tuesday.
Asked during an appearance on Breitbart News Daily on SiriusXM 125 the Patriot Channel on Monday by Breitbart News editor-in-chief Alex Marlow if she will support whoever wins the nomination, she said she will not.
“If you do not win tomorrow, do you intend to support the Republican nominee whoever it is?” Marlow asked.
In reply, she said she will not support the Republican nominee against the likely Democrat nominee Lt. Gov. John Fetterman. It is worth noting Fetterman is an avowed socialist, so Barnette refusing to support either Dr. Mehmet Oz or businessman David McCormick if one of them wins instead of her essentially means she would be helping a socialist Democrat win in the general election.
Note that they changed her words. She did NOT say she would not support the “Republican”. She said she would not support “Globalists”.
Any R. voter who would support a Globalist needs a reality check. I’m w/ Kathy here.
……” Matthew Boyle at Breitbart asked, “If you do not win tomorrow, do you intend to support the Republican nominee whoever it is?”
“I have no intentions of supporting globalists,” Barnette said. “I believe we have ran out of room on this runway for this spaceship. I believe we have very little rope left to just roll the dice and we’ll see how it all works out on the other end. I believe our country is in trouble. I don’t believe we have much longer and I believe what I have done is I have made it possible where Pennsylvanians do not have to hold their nose and vote for the lesser of two evils this time. I don’t think we have room to just vote for any old warm body with an R next to their name. I think we can do better than that.”…..
In the past I would have expected the losers in a race to get behind the
winner. This is not the old political fights between different flavors of republicans.
Oz and McCormick are both members of the World Economic Forum. As such Oz and McCormick are enemies to the survival of the U.S. The World Economic Forum has not hidden its goal of a one world totalitarian system –an agenda which per WEF requires literally destroying the U.S. from within. (see the WEF’s founder’s book The Great Reset for the blueprint .. they are on track and we are running out of time.)
Here’s Barnette’s fuller answer re not stumping for Oz or McCormick:
“I have no intentions of supporting globalists,” Barnette said. “I
believe we have ran out of room on this runway for this spaceship. I
believe we have very little rope left to just roll the dice and we’ll
see how it all works out on the other end. I believe our country is in
trouble. I don’t believe we have much longer and I believe what I have
done is I have made it possible where Pennsylvanians do not have to hold
their nose and vote for the lesser of two evils this time. I don’t
think we have room to just vote for any old warm body with an R next to
their name. I think we can do better than that.”
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/05/16/exclusive-kathy-barnette-refuses-to-support-gop-nominee-for-senate-if-it-is-not-her/
If American First cannot win now, during this expected red wave, then when will we win?
Barnette can win the general –in fact I believe she is much more likely to get cross-overs without losing the base than either Oz or McCormick.
i am fine that Barnette will not stump for WEF members, enemies of this country and pretend they are not the wolves inside the hen house that they are. This is not a race about different flavors of republicans –it is about Americans vs Globalists and the clock running out.
“Barnette can win the general –in fact I believe she is much more likely to get cross-overs without losing the base than either Oz or McCormick.” – Sunrei
How exactly is a conservative MAGA firebrand like her supposed to sway “cross-overs” ?
And independent & undecided voters would break toward the familiar name… Fetterman.
Black voters and she was also endorsed by a Hispanic group…
She’s even met with Amish and they don’t usually vote.
But she’s big on anti-abortion and so are they. A lot voted for Trump.
Fetterman who held an unarmed black man at gun point?
Somehow I don’t think that will play well with blacks after Buffalo.
great answer
the WEF is the enemy
Susquehanna poll:
SP&R
@SusquehannaPR
Breaking: SP&R’s New Pa GOP poll out today (conducted 5/12-5/15, 400n likely voters) shows 2-way tie for US Senate w/ Oz (28%) Barnette (27%). BUT! Among voters who made up minds in last few days Barnette leads (at 45%). She has MOJO! Billionaire spender D. McCormick is D.O.A.
More:
There is an article link up on this polling also…
*******
BREAKING: Kathy Barnette SURGES in PA GOP poll—now neck and neck with Dr. Oz, McCormick fades
https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-kathy-barnette-surges-in-pa-gop-poll-now-neck-and-neck-with-dr-oz-mccormick-fades?utm_campaign=64502
When they say “McCormick fades”, they ain’t kidding… looks like down to 11% with a boost in “not sure”? Translation: “I don’t know who I’m voting for, but it sure ain’t gonna be McCormack.”
Also FTA… data point:
“Speaking to OAN, Barnette addressed the situation in Ukraine, saying that both the Biden administration and the establishment GOP are being “reckless” in their approach. She said that from the beginning, Biden and the administration have been “ginning up this war,” and that they should be seeking peace.
“What Trump showed us,” she said, “is that peace comes through strength. What Biden is showing us is that war comes from weakness, that’s why we’re finding ourselves where we are.””
A poll of 400 people is not much of a poll really.
Likely voters. Not a poll of adults or registered voters. Likely voters is the Holy Grail of polling metrics.
I could have easily supported Sand, Gale or Bartos, but it was Kathy who took the lead last week.
Other than close family friends and diehard supporters, I wouldn’t be surprised if seeing those numbers for Barlette a large portion of their supports will switch tomorrow for Kathy. They had already decided not to back Trump’s choice, switching to Barnette takes away from Oz.
Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸
@JackPosobiec
BREAKING: NBC is now attacking Kathy Barnette for attending President Trump’s rally on Jan 6 and peacefully walking down the street afterwards
3:07 PM · May 16, 2022
Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸
@JackPosobiec
Wait MSNBC is calling
@Kathy4Truth
a white supremacist now? Hold up…
3:13 PM · May 16, 2022
Is it true, Kathy Barnette also spoke at a BLM Rally June of 2020 in Schwenksville PA when she was running for state office?
Shades of Mitt Romney/ MItch MCConnell and the rest of the RINOS & Teaparty frauds.
Since you are making that accusation, how about you show us why you think it’s true?
Faux News (John Roberts) is too…and also saying she might be affiliated with the Proud Boys 🙄. I am visiting my parents and they refuse to turn Faux News off. It’s driving me crazy!
4th part of MSNBC Tweet thread- they admit her innocence..
Welcome to a “Pelosi Wrap up Smear”. Lapdog Media will gladly play along. It keeps them from real journalism.
Is this like that Billy Bush tape?
Lol.
From my far away view in the west, I see Oz as the splitter candidate, not Barnette. Barnette is MAGA from the things I’ve watched and you cannot fake that for more than two (maybe more) years that she has been saying them. Nothing in this interview (which sounded more like an arrest Q&A or a deposition at times) seemed sketchy to me. If we keep compromising on America First candidates, we might gain some ephemeral satisfaction in the near term, but will always lose in the long term.
HOLD ON
Is it true Kathy Barnette spoke at BLM rally in June of 2020 in Schwenksville PA when she was running for state office?
That action reminds me of Mitt Romney.
President Trump is asking for OZ for a reason.
Her homophobic and anti Muslim tweets will be and anchor around her neck and she’ll sink like a stone in the general.
I don’t think most PA voters give a crap about those things. Most people care about the cost of things, if they can work, how their schools are, etc.
Only the Left will scream, and most citizens are just sick of it.
“Barrette did not do well in this interview”. Has Sundance become Hannitized?
Ever think that PDJT and Sundance are pointing something significant out to you and others that just seems to fly right over your (and others) heads or perhaps just too biased not to see the possibility of potential election problems ahead??????
They seem to believe they are more observant than President Trump and Sundance. I don’t agree with their assessment.
We have two imperfect candidates and the ENEmedia is conducting their usual splitter strategy. Works every time.
Quite the divide between two polls
*******
@SHEPMJS
@shepmjs
As I said, state polling is notoriously difficult:
Pennsylvania Senate – Republican Primary
Emerson
Oz32
Barnette27
McCormick26
Pennsylvania Senate – Republican Primary
Susquehanna
Oz28
Barnette27
McCormick11
3:27 PM · May 16, 2022
We don’t let paroled child molesters work in day care centers no matter how much they swear to have “seen the light”.
Why would we let a (supposedly) ex leftist lead our country just because they claim to have “seen” the error of their ways?
Leopards don’t change their spots. Neither do leftists.
Please pray that she doesn’t win tomorrow night! As if Dems didn’t already have enough material to use against her, this is the nail in the coffin. A photo of her with Proud Boys on J6. No she wasn’t inside the capitol or even on the capitol grounds, it doesn’t matter, just associating her with the Proud Boys will be used the same way that the “fine people” hoax was used against Trump. It is the last nail in the coffin (well maybe not, there may be more stuff out there that they can use against her. GOP Senate Candidate Kathy Barnette Spotted Marching With Proud Boys on Jan. 6 (thedailybeast.com)
Oh my! She stood in the street next to a ‘bad person’. Clutch those pearls harder.
Here’s one with Trump standing next to Jeffrey Epstein. Does that mean I shouldn’t have campaigned for him twice?
Walk around long enough, and I’ll bet you’ll walk near a ‘bad person’, too.
Ummm, that wasn’t necessary.
Wrong website to be slingin’ photos like that.
Why not? I don’t care who people find themselves inadvertently standing next to.
PDJT is a terrific President, no matter who he stood next to.
But you apparently make a campaign game out of it.
And Oz supported and spread the Jussie hoax. PA voters aren’t stupid.
Your reasoning would imply there is something WRONG with being a proud boy?
The more ground you cede the less ground you have to stand on.
Don’t let the media push their fake narratives. Push back to any and all that will listen.
President Trump will need a trusted friend on Capitol Hill instead of all the two-faced back-stabbers on the right side of the aisle. Vote for Dr Oz. so we can regain control of the Senate and help President Trump with his AMERICA FIRST agenda. Your choice Pennsylvania. Kathy Barnette has a potentially long successful career in politics ahead of her. Maybe it will start in 2024 and she will run for a House seat. She could join forces with MTG and form a new MAGA Caucus?
Vote for Ozzie and you continue believing that just having control of these institutions is what we need.
These elected rhinos are controlled opposition just like the dems.
First this woman criticizes Obama for being a moslem(plenty of video showing this) then wants to erect a statue of obama next to Lincoln’s. This person does not know where she stands. She is a sacrificial lamb, sent in by libs and their pacs, to destroy the republican candidate in the primary, only to be slaughtered in the general election. The dems have found a new way to cheat, do not be fooled
Yeah, that’s it.
They forced Madeline Dean to spend millions defending her 4th Congressional District seat in 2020 … because the Dems were just grooming Barnette for this moment to tank Oz and throw an election two years later.
Do you know how foolish you sound, and how completely unhinged these Establishment attacks have become?
That old man in the MAGA hat! The one next to the Trump banner.
Quick, hunt him down and round him up! He stood near a Proud Boy in the street.
Oh, my pearls!
These establishment attacks make the J6 Cheney Committee look like pikers.
Witch! Witch! Guilt by proximity.
Reading the comments here has given me an in-depth understanding of why the Right is in the pss poor shape they’re in right now. It’s embarrassing.
Yup. Some seem determined to snatch a defeat from the jaws of victory.
Yes, yes, vote for the newbie that nobody’s heard of … because she’s megaMAGA.
Everyone in PA (the people she would be representing) has heard of Kathy Barnette. It’s obvious you don’t even live in PA.
Instead, you keep defending this …
Whoopsie
The right is fighting as it does in every election.
What you are witnessing here (and it’s quite apparent), there are those who are working for Barnett or are completely crazed over this campaign. Critical thinking and deep research is completely out the window at this time of the campaign. It’s double-down time, all the way through now.
Barnett’s supporters/worker bees posting here and probably elsewhere are really PO’d that PDJT and Sundance have sent a cautionary missive on Barnett. And PDJT endorsed Mastriano (who is surging bigly now) and OZ who is now 5 pts ahead…
So…this will go on until tomorrow, when it’s over.
If she wins….this will prove to them they are geniuses and PDJT and Sundance don’t know “what the Hell they’re talking about”!!!!!!
If she loses; this will prove to them they are geniuses and PDJT and Sundance don’t know “what the Hell they’re doing or talking about” and it’s the fault of PDJT because he endorsed Oz…..and Sundance….well…Sundance is not perfect and he makes mistakes too!!!
See how that works?
Emotions are sky high. Thank goodness it’s all over tomorrow.
This poll from last month, April 7th. It was a 2-man race then as it had been all year.
At 5 pm tonight, on the John Fredericks Show; Oz was 5 pts. ahead……
Yes, 5% according to the latest Emerson poll…
https://emersonpolling.reportablenews.com/pr/pennsylvania-2022-poll-oz-leads-as-barnette-surges-mccormick-stays-in-contention-in-final-stage-of-gop-senate-race
While Oz holds a plurality of support in the primary, 48% of Republican primary voters have a somewhat or strongly unfavorable opinion of Oz, compared to 32% who have an unfavorable opinion of McCormick and 28% who view Barnette unfavorably. David McCormick has the highest favorability: 46% have a strongly or somewhat favorable opinion of McCormick. Barnette holds 43% favorability while Oz holds 37%.
The Emerson College Polling Pennsylvania poll of Republican primary voters was conducted May 14-15, 2022. The Republican primary sample consisted of very likely voters, n=1,000, with a Credibility Interval (CI) similar to a poll’s margin of error (MOE) of +/- 3 percentage points.
Key Takeaways
Just watched the John Fredericks show on RAV. He’s following (his bus tours) the PA and GA races. It was very interesting.
According to the Frederick’s show polls and Emerson poll, it appears that Barnett has peaked and is now complaining that a few conservative on-line sites are questioning her, although Dr. Oz has had to contend with at minimum 57 million in negative ads against him for 4 months straight. Oz also has a local republican DA working with him and he was interviewed by Fredericks….so, he is apparently endorsed locally.
What was even more interesting, he led off with Mastriano, who is on a bus tour, and Mastriano did NOT mention one word about Barnett, she’s not on tour with him….and Mastriano is killing it, since PDJT’s endorsement! What gives?
Perdue was on, he’s is surging, more R’s are voting that have not voted in the last 4 years, D’s early voting numbers are down and Kemp is hovering around mid-40’s and Baris confirmed those numbers…in fact, they are Baris’s (People’s Pundit) numbers bottom line as of today. Kemp’s rally with the 3 rino’s and tour is not bringing in the people and that’s why they are looking to Pence to push him over the line…but the ‘experts’ in polling (i.e. Baris, etal) do not see it happening because the R’s do not trust Kemp after the 2020 steal.
Dr. Oz was also on and Fredericks is with him tonight for a big rally in PA,,,,quite frankly, Oz answered the tough questions without hesitation and with the winning attitude…he’s not whiny or arrogant. I am not a Dr. Oz fan…saw his show a few times, thought it was boring but I don’t like that type of show anyway….also, I never watched Trump’s famous TV show, can’t even remember it now, as I type.
So, that’s where it’s at on Real America’s Voice and they do have a growing audience worldwide….just sayin’.
Like this tough question …
Oz has the “smooth, lying, politician” stuff down pat.
This answer is *exactly* like his 2A vid., above.
This guy’s a loose cannon. No telling what he’ll do if he’s actually elected.
I said the John Fredericks Show……
You are parroting and posting David Brody…..
Fail!
Lol. These are Oz’s dodges and obfuscations, not the host’s.
Because Oz said it on another show, it doesn’t matter?
Pathetic logic. You failed.
Well of course I do!
It looks like Kathy Barnette is the best candidate for America and Pennsylvania.
I love Trump. I do not agree with his choice at this time. Don’t live in PA.
I listened to a radio/podcast whatever interview with her yesterday and liked her. After reading your comment that she unfortunately did not do well in this one was therefore intriguing. How so? I had to watch. I would have watched anyway given the circumstances. I still like her. Perhaps more and wonder what prompted the comment. I thought she was great. I liked that she didn’t apologize for offending Islam but, simply gave context to her statements. The fact that she apparently came out of nowhere is sketchy from a certain point of view but, she did announce over a year ago, I believe before any of the others. I looked hard in this interview as well as the voice only for sketchy and sensed only sincerity and humbleness. I like her even more. She made a good point if they had to go back ten years and use the religion of peace against her.
I don’t know whether Sands or someone might be more emphatically MAGA than Barnette, but Dr. Oz is not it.
I heard her weeks ago on WARROOM, she explained that at one point she realized that she had made her blackness her idol; she repented about that and I believe she now feels more like Candace Owens, more God and America First.
I don’t when that happened exactly.
Barnette is 100% right about the importation of the Muslims into the US, they have already bluntly stated that their goal is a Worldwide Caliphate and that the effort in the US is going well in this regard. Check out Valerie Jarrett’s commencement address to Berkeley in 1978 (if you can find it, they have scrubbed it from the in, though many here have seen it).
And if you don’t believe me look to Thomas Jefferson’s comments. He knew.
Barnette’s tweets shared by Grenell date between 2013 to 2020, including a 2013 tweet from Barnette’s account that says “Please PRAY for my babies and me. We are on our way to California and there’s a homosexual female…” followed by a Facebook link that was disabled.
In 2015 Barnette tweeted in a replay to the conservative Wayne Dupree Show “That’s the point. Many homosexuals LEAD with their sexual preference. Leave d immortality in their bedroom.”
Barnette also tweeted several comments regarding Islam, including a 2015 tweet stating “Pedophilia is a Cornerstone of Islam” and a 2017 tweet saying “Islam is a theocracy, should be banned from USA. Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond’s book: Slavery, Terrorism, and” followed by a Facebook link. The full name of the book is “Slavery, Terrorism, and Islam.”
On the afternoon of the Dec. 15 2015 Republican debate Barnette tweeted “We must understand the mentality of the enemy. The enemy is #Islam! #Presidential Debate.”
Why is Dr. Oz running in the first place when he’s not a resident of the state?
Why does he care to run?
Who contacted him and asked him to run?
“Dr. Oz grew up in the Greater Philadelphia region, less than 5 miles from the PA border. He went to school in Pennsylvania, met his wife, and got married in Pennsylvania, and 2 of his children were born in Pennsylvania. He currently resides in Bryn Athyn, Pennsylvania, where his wife’s family have lived for a hundred years.”
His wife is from PA. Oz was born in Cleveland.
The “Greater Philadelphia region” = Wilmington, Delaware.
Oz was registered and voted in New Jersey in 2020, by absentee ballot.
I won’t touch on the two years he served in the Turkish Army, because that’s just too easy.
Yes, but until recently was not registered to vote in PA and lived in NJ with homes in other States.
The address he list now isn’t a home he owns but his in-laws.
So in my eyes Oz is a Carpetbagger.
Absolutely. I am feeling very disillusioned with Donald Trump. He does not respect his supporters; what has he done to help out the J6 political prisones and now he has a supporter, Kathy, who was at the J6 rally and marched peacefully to the Capitol and he is not only not supporting her but opposing her. He is becoming a RINO. The first person he endorsed was Marco Rubio, who knew the Russia collusion smear was fake and supported it in his position on the SSIC.. he supports David Perdue in Georgia who never supported him and is a RINO phony…sorry…this is all unacceptable to me…
For Your Information: Donald J. Trump and David Perdue have been friends for more years than you can count.