With mostly wins and a few losses in the pre-trial evidentiary hearings for Special Counsel John Durham, the case against Clinton lawyer Michael Sussmann is scheduled for trial next week. Now the witness lists are coming forth.
WASHINGTON – […] Robby Mook, who managed Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign, Clinton campaign attorney Marc Elias and FBI counterintelligence leader Bill Priestap and former top FBI lawyer James Baker are among those called as government witnesses, said prosecutor Andrew DeFilipiis. (link)
Additionally, Laura Seago, a top tech official at research firm Fusion GPS (she has immunity in exchange for testimony); Deborah Fine, a Clinton campaign lawyer; and a CIA official identified as Kevin B are also on the prosecution list.
[…] Defense attorneys unveiled their own high-powered witness list. It includes Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz, former acting Assistant Attorney General Mary McCord and Pulitzer Prize-winning New York Times reporter Eric Lichtblau. (read more)
Depending on preset Perkins Coie leverage and risk exposure, other officials from deep inside the DOJ/FBI small group operation may also be forced to stand as defense witnesses by Sussmann’s team. The lawfare combat teams look interesting.
The prosecution calling Marc Elias as a witness looks like a great opportunity for: (1) evidence against him for later use; and/or (2) a perjury trap.
The defense planning to call Inspector General Michael Horowitz puts the office of the IG into a suspicious position. Horowitz is a baddie.
Mary McCord is a conniving manipulator for the worst elements of the deep state, so it makes sense she would give testimony to defend Sussmann. McCord was a central figure in how the DOJ National Security Division sought to frame the appearance of the Trump-Russia collusion nonsense, and it was Mary McCord who later coordinated the National Security Council leaks between Alexander Vindman and anonymous CIA whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella.
Before becoming the Intelligence Community Inspector General, Michael Atkinson was Mary McCord’s chief legal advisor at the DOJ-NSD for the fraudulent submission of the Carter Page FISA application.
In his ICIG position, Atkinson changed the rules for McCord to allow an anonymous whistleblower complaint… at the time Mary McCord was working as legal research operative for the impeachment team in the House.
The Sussmann defense group has enough dirt on Mary McCord and Michael Horowitz to pressure both of them into favorable testimony. We will likely see other corrupt DOJ and FBI officials also pushed to defend Clinton’s legal crew.
On the prosecution side, Laura Seago (with immunity) has details of the motives inside Fusion GPS by owner/operators Glenn Simpson and Peter Fritsch. Her testimony should be interesting and will likely overlap into other prosecutions if there are any.
Bill Priestap was Peter Strzok’s boss and James Baker was FBI legal counsel. If there was anyone who seemed less willing (slightly) to frame Trump you could make an argument that Priestap and Baker were the least corrupt on the scale of internal corruption. From the perspective of criminal conduct they would be the two FBI insiders less willing to take a fall.
Keep in mind the media has a strong vested interest in the Sussmann prosecution. If Sussmann is found guilty it makes the media culpability look even worse. The media was pushing the same false information to the public that Michael Sussmann was pushing into the FBI.
As previously stated, don’t look for Durham to go inside government with his investigation; he appears focused exclusively on the outside players from the Clinton team.
Trial starts the 16th right? Let’s GOOooooooo!
Durham is facing an Obama Judge, a Washington DC jury, hostile FBI witnesses and a team of connected Lawfare defense attorneys. I wouldn’t get your hopes up!
Robby Mook? But not this guy?
That was Tommy “Van Driver” Vietor, the kid who thinks the “past” was, like, lame, and stuff…
Dude.
I stopped predicting the future when the carnival let me go for getting too many things wrong. I will watch closely but I have no idea what is about to happen.
😂 I won’t claim clairvoyance either, but I recall a lot of speculation 2 years ago about whether Baker had “flipped”. Hope springs eternal. If we can’t lock up any of the evil ones inside government, I’d love to see the smug Mark Elias and Glen Simpson behind bars.
I hope the spray paint can explodes in Durhams face
While he covers up Bondo Barrs handiwork
Just more Lamp Post Ornaments!
The way that this can explode in everybody’s faces is if Hillary Clinton takes umbrage in having her team take the fall and introduces testimony through her minions implicating some of Obama’s people. Everybody should hurt a little is what I am thinking that she is thinking. That tiny little move could quickly escalate between the bruised egos of ego maniacs.
I like the way you think. Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.
“Please arrest Hillary,….please arrest Hillary…. Please arrest Hillary..” – Bubba Clinton every night dreaming to go out and cavourt with 18 year olds again….
Lol!
I dare say he has “cavorted” with much, much younger kids…..unfortunately.
“Lock her up” was just an idea. The Clintons are good people according to Trump.
If the Durham investigation keeps Hildebeast in check so she can’t run for President in 2024, it will be worth it. Of course, she could arkanside Durham & be back on the campaign trail in a flash.
Just about every name mentioned deserves a date with a rope. They are the insurrectionists.
That’s not going to happen but it could give her leverage to become VP then President. But before the Democrats and deep state put a pillow on ChiCom Joe’s face, like they did to Scalia, they have to get rid of Cackle Kamala!!
Nice to see that Scalia comment. Never bought the story about him or Breitbart.
Pessimistically, the pattern of the carefactor zero Marxists is that you just escalate -ANTIFA and Burn Loot Murder use violence and destruction as a default against boomers…. and the beltway groomers with their hands on the State Dept, DHS and The Pentagon will bring on ww3 rather than be humiliated with the revelations of The Truth. And without Truth, the foundation, everything… collapses.
I believe Durham will dynamite both sides the clintonistas and the big mikes
Imagine one of them committing perjury on the stand, in a trail about someone lying to the FBI.
Should be interesting.
Must be really tough for Durham to attempt any prosecutions knowing the entire corrupt world of leftists are aligned against him to protect the Criminally Corrupt Kenyan at all costs. Every player in this criminal scheme likely has some knowledge of the Kenyan’s involvement.
Let’s ask moustache guy
… bonus points:
When – ever, ever in history – have 2 heterosexual males sat that close together on a sofa, especially when there’s an empty seat to Barky’s right that he could spread out to?
exactly
Haha!
That’s as bad as an adjacent urinal violation.
Baby: No… Much worse. This looks like the post-coital cigarette to me.
The rule of the land is to leave one open if there’s a way to do so. Especially when no partition exists.
When someone violates, I like to, while doing my business, throw out this comment- Wooh oops, slippery hands, but dang, is the water a tad cold or what, jeez? You typically get a look or the bolder people usually remark “the waters only at the bottom.?”…or… “the waters cold?”
I usually remark “Oh, you don’t have that problem I guess, sorry.”
Extra bonus points:
A high resolution version of that photo, or merely zooming in on it will clearly show Barry and “The ‘Stash” holding hands – look closely at ‘Stash’s cigarette hand, Barry’s hand is palm up under his.
Barry had that “I love to throw back my head” thang going on even then.
that was Ozero’s companion that accompanied him on his trip to Paki when American citizens were not allowed there on a US passport
Hussein loves the way that mustache tickles him just the right way in all those wrong and naughty places.
Pickle fest
Let’s ask Michael La Vaughn Robinson:
https://streamable.com/el7iai
dresses to the right, it appears
and I’m not even a tailor
He disappeared but he noted in his farewell that he was sad to leave his buddies behind.
took me a minute, B A
That’s as gay as a pic can be w/out any sex going on.
Put me down for Sussman getting off. Durham then has done as much as he can. Establishment and Clinton team skate.
I would love to call you wrong, but I can’t.
I wish Court TV would televise it.
Federal courts don’t, or very rarely do, allow cameras, of any kind.
It would be competing w/the Depp/Heard case. Can’t be having that.
My sense is the game is rigged, the Deep State by 20.
Yep
I wonder if Sundance might consider sending to Durham a list of very targeted questions for these witnesses as my guess is Sundance knows this cases and the players better than Durham?
What is your uptake on this:
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/07/judge-spares-clinton-camp-in-sussmann-ruling-00030887
also read the judge cooper decision on what he will and will not allow by durham wrt sussman
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638.121.0.pdf
I’ve read it several times. It’s obvious the Judge is taking issue with durham using this trial, involving ONLY the single charge of lying to the FBI, to then proceed into the depths of a conspiracy, which durham HAS NOT CHARGED sussman with committing..in this trial. Legally, this would the correct judge decision.
Which begs the question: why did durham NOT investigate and then charge sussan AND OTHERS with a conspiracy?
additionally, what would be the reason for durham to even try and attempt to place conspiracy data points with names, places and motives in a simple lying charge trial?
could the answer be that Durham is using the Sussman trial to spike the ball, KNOWING WELL that the judge will refuse to allow it in this specific and narrow charge?
by instincts about the sussman indictment were recorded here at CTH …why go after the very center of the black hole?
you lose that case, everything else falls apart.
the very fact that durham has not charged sussman AND OTHER with a conspiracy, was the first indication, this entire trial of sussman was to deliberately spoil and spike the ball.
watch for it. 3, 2, 1…the prosecutor will accept a plea deal motion by sussman and the judge will sentence as a fine and a strong worded monologue.
I have zero faith based on the pattern and contours of this durham “investigation”.
Frankly, even IF sundance or anyone with great depth and knowledge about how to navigate and indict people with a conspiracy, durham has already proved he has already made the choice about how this will end:
he will spike the ball and everyone walks. He put sussman “on trial” for one reasons and one reason only.
so the entire conspiracy track can be effectively nulled out and never pursued by any other trial or special prosecutor.
spray paint, as sundance has described it. Elaborate, slow, spray paint…
Hope for the best, but prepare for the worst.
If Barry has domain over this aspect and goings on (being somewhere around the 5th level of Deep State hell), then he wants this to drag out for a year or two to keep the Hildabeast in her cage until it is too late to make a bid for the 2024 election. The threat of another shoe to drop must linger on with indictments and rumors of indictments. Obama is the Lizard lord of the Demonrat party and he will not allow the Clintons to get close to power again.
Disagree. We shall see
Respectfully disagree – he needs the conspiracy to demonstrate the mens rea – the guilty mind – for the lie to the fbi. Otherwise – oops – I forgot might work.
A jury in a Washington DC courtroom will stand with the Deep State regardless of how strong the evidence is against the defendant. Sussman’s decision not to cop a plea deal in return for a reduced sentence indicates that he and his lawyers are confident he will either be acquitted outright or that there will be a hung jury and Durham will then choose not to pursue a second trial.
Yes. I agree
DC juries are predominantly black, Sussman is white on white. Maybe that will favor justice.
The “problem” Durham has – or may be trying to create – is all the government players involved as witnesses.
Some of them are very arrogant, and may expose themselves to perjury charges because Durham likely has a LOT of the internal communications.
Horowitz has major problems because his IG Reports document the internal corruption at FBI/DOJ…corruption that was simply not prosecuted. But it IS well documented.
How do you prosecute the corrupt Government actors when the Government is off limits? Make them contradict themselves and each other. The charge against Sussman is that he lied about who he was working for, and that he knowingly pushed falsified/fabricated evidence.
His defense will have to be that those government people did know who he was…because he can’t credibly claim that he wasn’t working for the Clinton campaign.
That puts the government people in a bind. If they claim that he lied, he’s guilty. If they claim they knew who he was working for, they get exposed as co-conspirators. They could be prosecuted for perjury and Durham never has to take down the entire US Government.
Horowitz, in particular, has huge problems because it’s clear he worked hard to obfuscate the involvement of the Clinton Campaign.
IMO, this time we get the evil. It begins the fall of dominoes. They are in a sense trapped and there is no way out for them.
I pray you are correct.
No Democrat will ever be convicted in DC, 92% voted Democrat in 2020and 90% in 2016. Now that is what one calls groupthink. There is simply not enough brain power to question any of the glaring inconsistencies or lies that have been part of Russiagate since inception. There may be a few low hanging fruit on the table but this will be a nothing burger just like the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. No new information will be gleaned and any pertinent info will be swept under the rug. Deep State for the win.
Not to mention, commie lefties don’t believe in truth. Their post-modern group think tells them everything is subjective. Which is why they accept inconsistencies and can seemingly lie so easily. Well…, we see them as lies. They don’t.
wasn’t the grand jury from D.C? AS RIGHT AS YOU ARE, WHEN PEOPLE ARE SITTING IN A COURT ROOM IN A JURY, SOMETHING CHANGES .
I pray that you’re correct and the jurors remember that their Americans first and whichever party they support a distant second.
How about this…..I don’t believe John Durhan exists….The ‘Phantom’ hasn’t been seen in years…..I’ve said, many times….With 150+ million camera phones there has not been a current picture or video of John durhan leaving his home(assuming he has one) a court house, Gas station, train station, grocery store or just a general picture or someone approaching him with questions…Zero, nada….
Listen, when you can blatantly steal an election……Faking a ‘John Durham’ should be a walk in the park….The faked FISA documents…..Until, I actually see ‘John Durham’ give a press conference I ain’t buying it….and don’t give me the confidencial crap…Whatevere…..Mueller had Zero problem making public appearences….
So you’re saying Durham = Dr. Jack Griffin?
I’m with you. Every time I see the old Durham picture, I close my eyes and picture Joe Pesci in “My Cousin Vinny” walking about the courtroom talking about the Utes and making his case to Fred Gwynne. That’s as real as it gets.
Recollection of that scene makes me chuckle every time.
Yeah, not sure what is worse, having to listen to someone like Rooster Head, all hat and no cattle, or a mystical figure that is cattle and no hat.
Hi, James.
…where everyone can easily see the government implanted chip bulging the skin above the right temple.
I’m thinking the 5th will be passed generously around the courtroom until total incoherence is achieved.
The ‘5th’ is such old school. Now they all just say; “I can’t recall.”
“As previously stated, don’t look for Durham to go inside government with his investigation; he appears focused exclusively on the outside players from the Clinton team.”
Not ideal, but glad to see some action taken.
Seems like a good opportunity to ask Horowitz why he hid key information in the footnotes of his report.
Horowitz played stupid and claimed that he didn’t have any authority when, in fact, he has a force of 500 Criminal Investigators (Special Agents) with full law enforcement authority, teams of auditors and financial analysts, attorneys and full access to both federal prosecutors and grand juries which Horowitz utilized daily in his investigations…EXCEPT FOR THE FBI AND DOJ ATTEMPTING TO FRAME PRESIDENT TRUMP FOR A CRIME THAT NEVER EVEN HAPPENED!
Horowitz a “baddie”.
Even knowing his downplay re FISA abuse etc, I didn’t know exactly what to make of that.
At this point, given the 16-17 Coup, the 2020 Election steal, the Deep State involvement in both, the complete complicity of FBI, DOJ, and the 16 other agencies, I’m not expecting anything but a rug sweep. 5 years ago I thought there would have to be justice, now I know that was patriotic hopium, (to steal from SD).
My remaining expectation, a slim reed I will admit, is that the incoming Congress does a proctological exam with Elephant high Forceps, but that is likely, unlikely.
May Durham render me incorrect, as no one would be happier.
Keeping my expectations low. I don’t expect any justice in this courtroom, but I am hoping the transcripts contain highly useful info for opening a few more eyes.
No justice, just just-us.
The judge in this case is the Deep State’s water-boy.
Interesting, Sundance. Thanks for the summary of the situation.
So, who does go inside government to root out the corruption?
Rhetorical question. We know it is nobody.
elect trump, and people like barnette , and turn them loose.
They will dust off the Clinton playbook and deny, deny, and deny.
My cat is a great hunter. Durham is supposed to be a great hunter. There are rats and there are mice. Hunters go after both.
My gut tells me Durham is only going to catch mice while the rats go on living freely. The method of operation in Washington, DC appears to me to be modeled after passive aggressive behaviors.
Durham comes across as a lone wolf in his search for those truths mostly hidden from public view. I know of no major politicians cheering him on, supporting his quest with press conferences or speeches in Congress, much less appearances on major media outlets.
Run out the clock comes across as a major tactic here with the big players heavily insulated. I don’t think Durham will end up with any big time scalps…he may never intended to do so, I just don’t know but I have little faith a fair game will be played any time soon.
I have more faith in your cat (and ours).
Here is what I don’t understand about the position that Durham is only going after non government actors in this justice system charade, if any of the non government actors are facing real jail time at the end of this (stop laughing for a minute), what is to prevent them from spilling the beans on government actors in the coup? They are going to threaten to talk if they face jail time.
your last sentence answers.
this is a single charge against sussman for lying to federal law enforcement.
there is no conspiracy charge.
there will be no jail time even if sussman is convicted.
what happened to klinesmith? he lies and was convicted. paid a fine, plead to a misdemeanor kept his law licence and that was that. (even carter page “mysteriously” dropped his lawsuit ..like that was some surprise for a cia asset fulfilling his role and ruse as the ‘victim’).
it will be the same with sussman.
WE all KNOW that klinesmith was involved in a conspiracy, yet he was merely charged with lying and falsifying an official document. plead to a misdemeanor .
durham chose to indict sussman with the similar simple lying charge for precisely the SAME OUTCOME that was provided in the klinesmith case.
as Sundance has described: spray paint.
tldr: no one is being threatened by any serious charges or jail time…BY DESIGN. (durham is not your friend)
I just read that Saturday the Judge in Sussmann Case Limited Evidence of concerning Hillary Clinton
.https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/05/09/judge-in-sussmann-case-limits-evidence-of-clinton-conspiracy/
This is true. The judge narrowed the evidence that durham “intended” to introduce into this trial wrt to a larger conspiracy and organized crime theme. said: “it would confuse the jury, given this is a simple lying charge against sussman and not a criminal conspiracy indictment” (or words to that effect).
please read my response to bogeyfree in this thread, where I lay out the real reasons why durham would “dare” to throw in the kitchen sink in this simple lying charge trial against sussman. I also provided the actual link to the judge cooper decision on the matter and you can read it for yourself. It’s not a radical decision by the judge. What it does however, is exposes the real reasons why durham would want to try and spoil the larger conspiracy using this simply trial against sussman as the “excuse”. Any judge would have ruled in a similar way. It’s about the most predictable aspect any experienced prosecutor would expect.
which begs the question: why would durham attempt to include evidence that he KNEW would ultimately be disallowed by this judge?
I think we can all start to understand truly, what sundance has accurately described here: spray paint.
this case is about spiking the ball and calling it game over with the larger conspiracy.
done.
and then DOJ/SC goes home.
everyone walks.
return to business as usual.
My question is if the judge read the emails can he be called as a witness in another prosecution.
Sounds like the Swamp are sending their Big Guns! It’s about to get interesting …
Will this trial be televised?
Seriously ?, it will never be mentioned in any main stream media. It will be buried with the 2000 Mules.
Anyone who touched this mess should die in prison J6 style.
Can the defense sway the jury with sheer numbers of FBI agents (All corrupt), saying “Look at all these honest and experienced civil servants who say Sussmann is innocent!!!”
With dueling summaries and summaries that did not match body of the actual IG report itself … Horowitz’s testimony has the greatest potential for the most entertainment. Just depends on which questions are asked. Too bad somebody with trial experience from CTH, who were around in 2016-2019, cannot be called to help with the questions.
Otherwise it is going to be endless rounds of dueling expert witness opinions, that could have some entertainment value.
So, we finally hear something from Captain America, Bill Priestap, he who was supposed to be the key to the Masterlock— note, without a key, a Masterlock takes a cutting torch to open; Horowitz is indeed a baddie, but he comes across to the average, uninformed yokel as, oh, so reasonable, so Hollywood handsome, so debonair, so smooth, so urbane, how can he not be telling the truth; why, he should have starred in Mad Men.
This is a really, really simple question — that I have asked myself many, many times:
WHAT is it about Hillary Clinton that makes so very, very many people DO everything within their own power to defend HER?
Think about that question. Really think about it.
Hillary Clinton is not even a ‘likeable’ person — yet untold people seem to ‘worship’ her to the point where they will sacrifice themselves.
(The answer is not pure ideology, as there are many fellow travelers who share the same beliefs that Hillary Clinton does.)
$$$$$
She is a sellout
yep. Sussman will probably change his plea to guilty before the trial. There will be no testimonies and no exposure of anyone else. He’s the fallguy.
People like her collect dirt on people. And when there is no dirt, they create it. In the corrupt world of politics, it’s called insurance.
p2p..
pay to play.
the clintons didn’t invent it.
they took it global.
everybody and I mean everyone that enters the clinton foundation even at the periphery gets filthy rich.
H Clinton begin collecting incriminating information about anyone she could when Bill was President. and never stopped. She has the goods on many and will continue to extort them when ever needed.
Well, I assume you have seen the list of people who
arewere problems for the Clintons.She greases the skids with cash and lots of it…. She offers people a life that no normal person could live… via that cash. She has a network that is organized, it spans the globe in many countries with backers that are filthy rich, the Rockefellers,. Duponts, Walton’s, Rothschilds, etc. She has business associates that partner with Celebrities. She promises the Celebs will become famous and rich, but they have to kick back the percentage to her business associates many of whom are lessor known to the public.
Many people around her have become Billionaires over night…. because her spigot was the Govt’ funded taxpayers money and possibly even cartel money, as I have seen many of these people close to her open up shop in Mexico via Tequila and other businesses that Mexican’s excel at.
Durham pucks the low hanging fruit while the tree continues to rot.
Although I’d agree Durham won’t be going after the government insiders at this time, it may well be (hopium alert) that he’s laying the groundwork for that later.
He has already put into evidence that the CIA “warned” obama that the clinton campaign was conjuring up a Russia collusion story. We also already know the FBLie knew in Jan 2017 after interviewing Danchenko the dossier was garbage.
Yet they continued the investigation. Any pretense they were “fooled” flies out the window.
In addition, it may well come out during trial that some of the non-state actors drop some info in order to save their own skin, that the government insiders weren’t fooled at all, and help engineer the media leaks.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/04/james_comey_the_smiling_weasel.html
And how long will all this take…..even assuming we win this??? FO-EVER….appeals throuout, and all the way up to the Supremes, then remands, etc.
Sorry…..this is not the way, Folks.
So, Crime Boss Obama slowly bleeds his rival Crime family (Clintons) but not so much that they go Sampson and take the whole house down. Just enough to ensure they never lead the Democratic party again.
That’s total cover-up not allowing anything Durham has to offer!
“The Sussmann defense group has enough dirt on Mary McCord and Michael Horowitz to pressure both of them into favorable testimony. We will likely see other corrupt DOJ and FBI officials also pushed to defend Clinton’s legal crew.”
Two things:
Sally Q. (Quisling) Yates.
bunch of con man and women deep state lib’s,
You saw what happened in the O.J. Simpson trial. The location and jury pool are huge factors in how predisposed attitudes shape interpretations of information. Even allowing that a certain percentage will think they are being objective, it requires effort and discipline to attain neutrality. Especially with a judge inclined to favor the home team.
This will be a fun exercise for the lawfare group to flaunt their chops. After all the backroom strategizing they get to come on stage for the main event and perform for the public. All the while enhancing their reputations and status inside the beltway.
The Kentucky Derby had more favorable odds than expecting major damage to the defendents. At most, some reprimands, minor scapegoating and stern warnings, but back to business as usual.
Enjoy the show.
If Special Counsel John Durham was going to reveal what optimistic folks proclaim as possible; how is Durham going to handle the reality that Barrack Obama knew all about the deep state coup?
Flashback:
Is this guy STILL the person described as the “main guy”, the “central investigator”, “the guy who coordinates all investigative aspects” behind the John Durham investigation?
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2020/08/22/my-discussion-with-john-durhams-lead-investigator-william-aldenberg/
I hope the Horowitz cross examination gets a little…contentious.
Did that “Pulitzer-prize winning reporter for the NY Times” get it for the Russia-conspiracy-theory story that they never apologized for?
NOT GUILTY because Sussman didn’t deceive anyone at the FBI. They were all in on his lies and lied along with hm.
I dislike the Clintons but the probelm here is not the political candidate. It is the bureaucrats who damaged our institutions in pursuing this scam AND THEY NEW it was a scam.
I suspect Durham has about as much chance of winning with a DC jury as Bugtussle Community College has of beating the Georgia Bulldogs in Georgia.
What a group of defense witnesses. Mary McCord, among others, should defending their own indictments. Durham should know this. All he had to do was read Sundance and do his own verification.
What did he lose so far Sundance ?
You need to add Jake Sullivan here. He is in current govt, and is tied to Biden and Obama as many others are crossover regime players
I now see what the judge did today. Guess we are going to get the mike Flynn treatment
Marc Elias is conciglieri to the Clinton team. There to protect HRC. Baker and Priestap there to protect the FBI.
Sussman and maybe a couple of others gonna have to take the fall.
Even if they get a conviction this is the biggest dud investigation and prosecution in the history of scandals.
One lowly charge of lying to the FBI… Clinesmith and Wolfe are thumbs up in the background and telling him not to sweat it!!!
NOT HOLDING MY BReATH about any of this. He’ll skip.